Recapping the Boston Celtics’ 2023 Las Vegas Summer League

The Celtics got good looks at players like Reggie Kissoonlal, Vincent Valerio-Bodon, Justin Bean, Olek Balcerowski, and Udoka Azubuike.

The Boston Celtics had a mixed performance in the NBA’s 2023 Las Vegas Summer League, finishing 2-3 and missing the playoffs. There was plenty to learn from the Celtics’ participation in the annual Nevada exhibition series nonetheless.

The Celtics gained good looks at Reggie Kissoonlal, Vincent Valerio-Bodon, Justin Bean, Olek Balcerowski and Udoka Azubuike.

The team felt good enough about Jay Scrubb’s play in the backcourt to sign him to a two-way deal after a strong series of games. Scrubb was one of the Celtics’ most consistent players.

The hosts of the “How Bout Them Celtics!” podcast sat down to talk over summer league as a whole on an episode.

Take a look at the clip embedded above to hear what they had to say about what we should take away from what we saw in Las Vegas this year.

Listen to the “Celtics Lab” podcast on:

Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/3zBKQY6

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3GfUPFi

YouTube: https://bit.ly/3F9DvjQ

[lawrence-auto-related count=1 category=590969556]

Breaking down the Boston Celtics’ roster for Las Vegas Summer League

Few if any of these players will make the Celtics’ regular roster, but there is a chance for several to make one of the team’s three two way slots for the 2023-24 season.

While there might be a few more additions to the Boston Celtics roster for the NBA’s 2023 Las Vegas Summer League, for all intents and purposes we have a pretty good idea of who will be the Sin City Celtics this offseason.

The Summer Celtics includes Alexander Balcerowski, Kamar Baldwin, Justin Bean, Justin Champagnie, JD Davison, Eugene German, Sam Griesel, Reggie Kissoonlal, Mychael Mulder, Jay Scrubb, Vincent Valerio-Bodon, and Jordan Walsh. As is the case with the league’s annual summer exhibition series, few if any of these players will make the Celtics’ regular roster, but there is a chance for several to make one of the team’s three two way slots for the 2023-24 season.

To learn more about each and their odds of donning green and white next season, check out the clip embedded below from the folks at the “How ‘Bout Them Celtics?” podcast.

Listen to the “Celtics Lab” podcast on:

Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/3zBKQY6

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3GfUPFi

YouTube: https://bit.ly/3F9DvjQ

[lawrence-auto-related count=1 category=590969556]

Utah State forward Justin Bean: ‘I’m letting my story write itself’

Rookie Wire recently caught up with Bean to discuss the pre-draft process, what he is looking to showcase to teams and much more.

When Justin Bean first joined Utah State University as a walk-on in 2017, he never envisioned the type of success he’d eventually see with the Aggies over the next five years.

Now, Bean is looking to continue his run at the next level.

Bean was named to the All-Mountain West second team last season after averaging a career-high 17.4 points, 9.9 rebounds, 2.6 assists and 1.6 steals in 34 games. He led the team in scoring, rebounding, steals and field goals made (227).

He leaves the program near the top of the leaderboard in several categories.

Bean is one of three Aggies players ever to haul in at least 1,000 career rebounds as his 1,027 total boards are second in program history. He had the most career games with at least 10 rebounds (57) and the second-most double-doubles (46).

“I would be lying to you if I said that I would be in this position,” Bean told Rookie Wire. “A lot of people dream about playing in the NBA since they’re little kids but for me, I was just trying to get a scholarship, honestly. That was my goal to find my way and earn a scholarship and a four-year degree.”

The 25-year-old established himself as one of the top scorers and rebounders in the country. He finished sixth in double-doubles (20) and was one of only eight Divison I players to average at least 17 points and 9.5 rebounds this season.

Bean also ranked highly in a couple of advanced metrics, too.

He was 10th in the country in box plus-minus (9.3) and fifth in points per game when cutting to the basket. He was efficient in catch-and-shoot opportunities and knocked down a blistering 46.5% from 3-point range.

Following the season, Bean declared for the NBA draft and is currently training in Chicago. He recently competed in the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament, an annual scouting event comprised of the top 64 seniors in the country.

Bean emerged as a standout after three games in Portsmouth, earning All-Tournament team honors. He averaged 11.3 points, 7.3 rebounds and 1.3 steals on 50% shooting from the field and was named Player of the Game in his second contest, recording 24 points and 10 rebounds.

Rookie Wire recently caught up with Bean to discuss the pre-draft process, what he is looking to showcase to teams, his collegiate career and much more.

Please note: This interview was minorly edited in its transcript for clarity

The biggest snubs to not get invited to the 2022 NBA combine or G League Elite Camp in Chicago

The NBA draft starts to take shape once the combine begins in Chicago, and we’re now less than a week away from those events kicking off.

The NBA draft starts to take shape once the combine begins in Chicago, and we’re now less than a week away from that event kicking off.

For the fourth year in a row, the process will begin with the G League Elite Camp. Forty-four prospects were invited to that camp, which takes place between May 16 and May 17. Then, a select few of those players will advance to the official NBA combine, where they will join the 78 players who were invited to those events, which will occur between May 18 and May 22.

These prospects are all competing for one of the 58 spots in the NBA draft. Based on their performance at the combine, some may opt to wait another year until they turn pro. Others, however, won’t even get a chance to show out at the combine.

NBA teams vote on which players should receive invitations to the combine, so if a player was not invited to either the G League Elite Camp or the NBA draft combine, it’s a pretty good sign of their draft stock right now.

Based on my intel and research, I’ve listed a few of the most notable players who will not be in Chicago. I did not include Michigan’s Caleb Houstan and Iowa’s Kris Murray, as both players reportedly rejected their invitations.

My list also excludes overseas players (e.g. Yannick Nzosa, Ibou Badji, Giordano Bortolani, Ziga Samar, Malcolm Cazalon, Gui Santos, Fedor Zugic, Mario Nakic, Yoan Makoundou, Carlos Alocen, Karlo Matkovic, and Danko Brankovic). Although some of those players are in a draftable range, many are still in the midst of the season.

Otherwise, the following players caught my attention as the biggest snubs:

Who is Utah State? Get to know the Oregon Ducks’ NIT opponent

The Ducks will face Utah State on Tuesday in the NIT. If they want to win, they’ll have to slow down Justin Bean and Brandon Horvath to do so.

Did he stay or did he go? Tracking the biggest NBA draft decisions

All prospects who declared early entry for the 2021 NBA draft without foregoing their collegiate eligibility had until July 7 to withdraw.

All prospects who declared early entry for the 2021 NBA draft without foregoing their collegiate eligibility had until July 7 to withdraw.

While the official date from the league is not actually until July 19, the NCAA has mandated the deadline of July 7 for players who wish to play college basketball next season.

Prospects who declared as early entry candidates but were just “testing the waters” often opt to return to the collegiate ranks so as to improve their draft stock for the subsequent year instead. But there are several reasons why a player might be even more willing to return to college for another campaign than usual.

For example, seniors have the option to use another year of eligibility because of the massive impact of COVID-19. Others may be interested in playing another year of college in front of fans after last season was met with many restrictions.

Meanwhile, all NCAA athletes also now have the ability to profit from their name, image and likeness (NIL) for the first time. This offers an avenue to collect some money while still in college without needing to fully commit to turning pro.

Here are the latest updates about who is still testing the waters, who will be turning pro and who will be returning to the NCAA.

Did he stay or did he go? Tracking the biggest NBA draft decisions

All prospects who declared early entry for the 2021 NBA draft without foregoing their collegiate eligibility had until July 7 to withdraw.

All prospects who declared early entry for the 2021 NBA draft without foregoing their collegiate eligibility had until July 7 to withdraw.

While the official date from the league is not actually until July 19, the NCAA has mandated the deadline of July 7 for players who wish to play college basketball next season.

Prospects who declared as early entry candidates but were just “testing the waters” often opt to return to the collegiate ranks so as to improve their draft stock for the subsequent year instead. But there are several reasons why a player might be even more willing to return to college for another campaign than usual.

For example, seniors have the option to use another year of eligibility because of the massive impact of COVID-19. Others may be interested in playing another year of college in front of fans after last season was met with many restrictions.

Meanwhile, all NCAA athletes also now have the ability to profit from their name, image and likeness (NIL) for the first time. This offers an avenue to collect some money while still in college without needing to fully commit to turning pro.

Here are the latest updates about who is still testing the waters, who will be turning pro and who will be returning to the NCAA.

Did he stay or did he go? Tracking the biggest NBA draft decisions

All prospects who declared early entry for the 2021 NBA draft without foregoing their collegiate eligibility had until July 7 to withdraw.

All prospects who declared early entry for the 2021 NBA draft without foregoing their collegiate eligibility had until July 7 to withdraw.

While the official date from the league is not actually until July 19, the NCAA has mandated the deadline of July 7 for players who wish to play college basketball next season.

Prospects who declared as early entry candidates but were just “testing the waters” often opt to return to the collegiate ranks so as to improve their draft stock for the subsequent year instead. But there are several reasons why a player might be even more willing to return to college for another campaign than usual.

For example, seniors have the option to use another year of eligibility because of the massive impact of COVID-19. Others may be interested in playing another year of college in front of fans after last season was met with many restrictions.

Meanwhile, all NCAA athletes also now have the ability to profit from their name, image and likeness (NIL) for the first time. This offers an avenue to collect some money while still in college without needing to fully commit to turning pro.

Here are the latest updates about who is still testing the waters, who will be turning pro and who will be returning to the NCAA.

Five for ’21: Ranking the Mountain West’s Top Five Rebounders

Five for ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Rebounders Predicting the top five Mountain West rebounders for the ’20-21 season Contact/Follow @andrewdieckhoff & @MWCwire Who are the top rebounders in the MW? In the final installment of …

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Five for ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Rebounders


Predicting the top five Mountain West rebounders for the ’20-21 season


Contact/Follow @andrewdieckhoff & @MWCwire

Who are the top rebounders in the MW?

In the final installment of Mountain West Wire’s offseason series, Five for ’21, we turn to the league’s best glass-cleaners.

As a reminder, the Five For ’21 series features our ranking of the top five Mountain West players in five different skill sets: passing, scoring, defending, rebounding, and shot blocking. The full Five For ’21 series schedule is below, including links to this week’s previous articles from Larry Muniz (@hardwoodtalk) and myself (@andrewdieckhoff).

Today’s list will borrow heavily from the Wednesday’s group of highlighted shot-blockers (for reasons that should be obvious), but a few fresh faces have been thrown in the mix as well. With those pleasantries out of the way, our final shortlist begins with its shortest player.

(NOTE: Statistics below taken from Sports-Reference.com. Percentages following per-game rebounding averages refer to rebounding rate in the respective category.)

5) David Roddy, Colorado State

  • Height/Weight: 6’5″, 250 lbs.
  • 2019-20 Stats: 5.6 RPG (12.8%), 3.9 DRPG (17.4%), 1.7 ORPG (8.0%)

OK, so while Roddy may not be as tall as any of his peers on this list, at 6’5″ and 250 pounds, he’s built like an NFL linebacker and has the toughness to match. Depending on the source, the Minneapolis native might be listed as a guard, a guard/forward, a wing, a wing forward, or a power forward. No matter what you call him, though, David Roddy brings a grittiness to the floor that few in the league can match.

His raw rebounding stats don’t exactly jump off the page, but consider this: Roddy ranked 12th in the Mountain West in rebound rate on both the offensive and defensive end of the court as freshman, and a handful of the players who finished ahead of him have either graduated or transferred out of the league. Among those departures is former teammate Nico Carvacho, the Mountain West’s career rebound leader. And while promising Rams sophomore Dischon Thomas is the likely beneficiary of most of those unclaimed boards now that Carvacho isn’t around, Roddy could also see a healthy uptick in his numbers.

It is entirely possible that Roddy finishes outside of the Top 10 in rebounding again this season, but his ability to bang around inside and get rebounds despite his height disadvantage was an important factor in Colorado State’s success last year. With the torch now officially passed to the Rams’ young roster, Roddy has a chance to make an even bigger impact this season. There may be some more traditional Goliaths in the league who will grab more rebounds, but I’m giving the nod to David here in the 5-spot.

4) Neemias Queta, Utah State

  • Height/Weight: 7’0″, 245 lbs.
  • 2019-20 Stats: 7.8 RPG (16.3%), 5.8 DRPG (22.9%), 2.0 ORPG (8.9%)

While Queta finished at #2 in our Five for ’21 shot-blockers list, the junior slips a bit lower when it comes to rebounding. As discussed in Wednesday’s piece, Queta’s numbers took a hit following the knee injury he suffered during FIBA play prior to the 2019-20 season. He eventually regained his form, though, and he is surely deserving of being included in this list.

Queta finished fifth in the Mountain West in defensive rebound rate last season, nabbing nearly a quarter of the available boards on that end of the floor. But his sophomore rebounding rates on both ends of the court were two percentage points lower than in his freshman campaign. Of course, it should be noted that there are a multitude of possible reasons that his numbers may have declined that don’t have to do with his injury — one of those reasons appears later in this list — and the kind of drop we are talking about is akin to falling from an A to an A-minus.

With Sam Merrill, Diogo Brito, and Abel Porter gone, it remains to be seen just how large a role Queta will occupy in the Aggie offense next season. If he is being relied upon to take more and more shots, it could cut into his rebounding numbers to some degree. That said, the smart money is on Queta in most of the one-on-one rebounding battles that the Mountain West has to offer.

3) Cheikh Mbacke Diong, UNLV

  • Height/Weight: 6’11 lbs, 230 lbs.
  • 2019-20:  7.9 RPG (17.8%), 4.9 DRPG (22.6%), 3.0 ORPG (13.2%)

Another recycled entry from the shot-blockers list, Diong has turned himself into one of the league’s best defensive big men, even if his scoring hasn’t quite caught up yet. His prowess for bullying others around in the paint is exactly the type of player that coach TJ Otzelberger needs in support of a talented group of scorers including Bryce Hamilton and David Jenkins Jr. For his part, Diong does precisely what is required of him.

As far as the numbers go, Diong finished his junior year as one of only five qualifying players to finish with a defensive rebound rate over 20% and an offensive rebound rate over 10% (min. 40% minutes played). Three of those players have since graduated, and the other one shows up later in this list, so Diong should fall among the league’s Top 5 rebounders almost by default.

With the sharp-shooting Jenkins taking over for Amauri Hardy in the offense, there may be slightly fewer rebounds available for Diong on the offensive end this year, but you can be sure that he’ll be ready to catch anything that comes off the rim. While his game isn’t likely to generate much content for the SportsCenter Top 10, Diong’s dedication to rebounding and defense will be critical to the Rebels’ success in year two of Coach TJ.

2) Nathan Mensah, San Diego State

  • Height/Weight: 6’10”, 220 lbs.
  • 2019-20: 6.8 RPG (20.2%), 4.8 DRPG (27.2%), 2.1 ORPG (12.8%)

On Wednesday, I detailed the what-ifs surrounding Nathan Mensah, whose 2019-20 season was lost months before it was taken from the rest of us due to a pulmonary embolism. But in the 13 games he did play last year, Mensah showed off some pretty eye-catching rebounding numbers. He was not quite at the level of departed Mountain West compatriots Nico Carvacho and RJ Williams, but the Ghanaian showed that he belongs in any conversation about the league’s best big men.

Because Mensah’s season was cut short, he didn’t qualify for the year-end statistical races. Had he maintained his rates over the full season, though, he would’ve been among the Mountain West’s best half-dozen rebounders. He also would’ve ended up in that prestigious 20/10 club noted above. Keep in mind that Mensah was only playing 20 minutes per game before his injury, and doing so in a very slow-paced offense, so his per-game averages are really not indicative of his skill on the boards.

Assuming Mensah is willing and able to return to the Aztecs when the next season begins, he has a very good chance to finish atop the Mountain West in both offensive and defensive rebounding rates. The main reason he doesn’t finish #1 in this list is because the player ahead of him posted very similar numbers — despite being three inches shorter than Mensah. In reality, it’s probably more of a 1A/1B situation, but now we’re just splitting hairs.

1) Justin Bean, Utah State

  • Height/Weight: 6’7″, 210 lbs.
  • 2019-20: 10.5 RPG (19.8%), 6.9 DRPG (24.6%), 3.6 ORPG (14.3%) 

Despite being on a Utah State team with a program all-timer in Sam Merrill and an exciting NBA prospect in Neemias Queta, Bean managed to carve out some good publicity for himself with a breakout sophomore campaign. As a freshman walk-on, Bean averaged 12 minutes per game and did not register a single start. He was effective in those limited minutes, both in terms of scoring and rebounding, which not only earned him a scholarship, but also a starting role in Craig Smith’s rotation.

In case you hadn’t yet put it together, Bean is the mystery man I alluded to earlier when discussing the 20/10 club for defensive and offensive rebounding rates. To be clear, including the Oklahoman in this list is not just some act of charity for the “little” guy. Bean’s numbers put him squarely among the league’s best rebounders, regardless of height. But while we’re on that subject, don’t forget that at various times the 6’7″ forward was competing for rebounds against three seven-footers on his own team: Queta, Kuba Karwowski (7’2″), and Trevin Dorius (7’0″).

Bean will enter his junior year at Utah State with much more weight on his shoulders than either of the previous two seasons, as the program moves on from the Merrill/Porter/Brito trio that played such a huge part in the Aggies’ recent success. But fans in Logan shouldn’t fret too much, as the best pound-for-pound rebounder in the Mountain West will still be cleaning the glass in Smith Spectrum.

Also considered (in alphabetical order): Mladen Armus, Boise State; Aguek Arop, San Diego State; K.J. Hymes, Nevada; Orlando Robinson, Fresno State; Robby Robinson, Nevada; Dischon Thomas, Colorado State.

Andrew Dieckhoff is a current USBWA member covering college basketball for Mountain West Wire. He also runs the Dieckhoff Power Index, a website dedicated to his college basketball ratings system and bracketology projections.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

[protected-iframe id=”09e6ca4e11e5838c3834d87c7b471ffb-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Five For ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Defenders

Five For ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Defenders Predicting the top five Mountain West defenders of the ’20-21 season Contact/Follow @HardwoodTalk & @MWCwire Who are the top defenders in the MW? In the fourth installment of Mountain West …

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Five For ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Defenders


Predicting the top five Mountain West defenders of the ’20-21 season


Contact/Follow @HardwoodTalk & @MWCwire

Who are the top defenders in the MW?

In the fourth installment of Mountain West Wire’s offseason series, Five for ’21, we stick with the defensive side of the ball as was started by my co-writer of this series Andrew Dieckhoff yesterday with the conference’s best shot blockers.

Just a reminder that the Five For ’21 series features our ranking of the top five Mountain West players in five different skill sets: passing, scoring, defending, rebounding, and shot blocking.

For the sake of avoiding redundancy, the top defenders list is focused more so on guards and wings than big men. With that in mind, any player that was selected to the shot blockers list is prevented from appearing on the top defenders list.

The Five For ’21 series schedule is below.

  • Monday: Passers
  • Tuesday: Scorers
  • Wednesday: Shot Blockers
  • Thursday: Defenders
  • Friday: Rebounders

Without further adieu, let’s take a look at the conference’s best defenders.

5) Hunter Maldonado, Wyoming

’19-20: 100.9 DRtg, 1.1 DBPM, 1.2 SPG, 2.1 STL%, 3.5 FLS/40

I think it’s easy to say, Maldonado is an absolute baller as he finds his way onto our second Five for ’21 ranking of the week. Maldonado secured the number two spot on our best passers list while also challenging our methods as an honorable mention in our best scorers list.

It’s absolutely impressive of how much of a do-it-all kind of player Maldonado is and the mark he has made on the conference in just his first two seasons in Laramie. I think I can speak for anybody who thinks losing the 6-7 combo guard to transfer amid Wyoming’s coaching change back in spring would have been a disservice to the conference. He does it all but absolutely terrorizes smaller guards with his length and athleticism at the top of the key. As we often see him sitting and waiting for opportunities for breakaway steals that lead to layups, dunks or dish offs at the other end.

As with every other category Maldonado dominates in, there is room for efficiency improvement. But for a player who was asked to be the leading scorer, rebounder and floor general on multiple occasions last season, I think we can learn to not dwell too heavily on past numbers in Laramie. While we look onward to Maldonado’s potential next season with a new head coach and some reinforcements hoping to climb out of the conference’s cellar going forward.

4) Kendle Moore, Colorado State

’19-20: 104.9 DRtg, 1.7 DBPM, 1.3 SPG, 2.5 STL%, 2.6 FLS/40

Moore is an interesting defender, simply due to his stature at 5-10, 145 pounds. If there’s ever been a stereotype holding true in Moore’s defensive game, it is that of the speedy, smaller and pesky guard who get’s into your dribble just a little more effortlessly than bigger guards are able to.

If there is a metric to look at in direct relation to his pick-pocketing abilities it’s the fact that he only averages 2.6 fouls per forty minutes, where the rest of the league’s best defenders mentioned on this list find themselves averaging anywhere from 3.0-4.4. Where he loses out and finds himself a little lower on the list than others with similar metrics is his size and frame. He has a defensive rating of 104.9 which on the flip side is much higher than anyone else on this list as well as some of the honorable mentions considered for his number four spot.

Still, Moore has been a tremendous two-way talent in Fort Collins since following head coach Niko Medved to the Mountain West after committing to play for him back in high school at Drake. He is a part of a youthful but talented core of backcourt players who are building a foundation at Colorado State that only seems to get better every year.

3) Desmond Cambridge Jr., Nevada

’18-19: 94.0 DRtg, 0.7 DBPM, 1.0 SPG, 1.7 BPG, 1.9 STL %, 3.3 FLS/40

Cambridge Jr. is certainly a name to keep an eye this year as far as newcomers to the conference goes. The springy 6-4 shooting guard not only puts points in the scoring column, but was one of the best at preventing opponents from doing so during his last campaign in 2018-2019. Cambridge Jr. boasts impressive statistical averages from his two seasons in the Ivy League. Not only is he to be considered a tremendous defender averaging a steal a game, he also averaged an impressive 1.7 blocks per game during his sophomore season.

He recorded a season high of 5 blocks against Stony Brook that year, nearly reaching that number again in two other outings against conference foe Harvard and LIU. If he had done that he would have had a similar game log to that of one of the Mountain West’s best shot blockers, seven-footer Neemias Queta, who recorded his own season high of five blocks on three occasions in 2019-2020.

The Wolf Pack’s latest import is going to be an exciting one for fans not only in Reno but around the conference to keep up with this season. Although Aztec fans may be acquainted with his game well enough, from back on December 29th, 2018 when the Brown Bears spent their holiday vacation securing a twenty-one point win inside Viejas Arena. Cambridge Jr. ended the night with 25 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals and 1 block against the Aztecs, I can imagine the defensive attention he will receive from the next player on our list when he returns this winter.

2) Matt Mitchell 1.06 SPG/0.34 BPG

’19-20: 89.5 DRtg, 3.5 DBPM, 1.1 SPG, 2.5 STL%, 4.4 FLS/40

Mitchell is a do it all kind of player for the Aztecs, but aside from rebounding and scoring, the 6-6 240 pound combo forward is also one of if not the team’s best returning defender. With great speed, length and a great frame Mitchell can take the task of guarding the other team’s best scorer regardless of what position they play.

Even though he recorded a high fouls per forty minutes average of 4.4, he was still able to log the second best defensive rating on this list at 89.5. A testament to his defensive hustle given right before he possibly get’s in foul trouble. We may find some of those impressive defensive numbers take a hit come next season with a larger scoring role. But keep in mind help is coming to San Diego in the form of 5-8 scoring machine Terrell Gomez.

Although Mitchell, who was the Aztec’s third leading scorer last season will surely be asked to do more with the departures of Malachi Flynn, Yanni Wetzell & K.J. Feagin. He should be up to the task to fill a similar role to that of conference Player of the Year and Defensive Player of the Year Malachi Flynn next season given his multifaceted game. As Aztec fans are hoping for no decrease in momentum after last season’s top-five national finish coupled with impressive conference dominance.

But just like the next player on this list, senior departures will definitely hurt. So now it begs the question, who will help Matt Mitchell keep defense, one of San Diego State’s biggest weapons a threat next year?

1) Justin Bean, Utah State

’19-20: 86.6 DRtg, 3.5 DBPM, 1.5 SPG, 2.9 STL%, 3.0 FLS/40

If you read my top-five scorers list back on Tuesday, you might remember I said Bean would make several appearances on several different lists this week. He is also one of the bigger defenders on this list at 6-7 210 pounds, though his versatility is on full display night in and night out with the Aggies and labeling him as a combo forward isn’t too far off, especially defensively.

We often find the forward battling with opposing bigs in the paint, using his everlasting motor to keep up with physically bigger opponents. While also finding him extended out to the perimeter to help cover ball screens, while also locking down players who attempt to drive it to the basket only to set up a lurking Neemias Queta whose just a step or two away from sending that shot to the bleachers.

Bean’s also responsible for the best defensive rating on this list at 86.6 while keeping his fouls per forty minutes low at just 3.0/40 min. Though part of what makes Utah State such a dangerous team is how all players buy into creating defensive stops as a unit. So with two of the conferences best defenders and fellow Aggies Diogo Brito and Sam Merrill now gone, who steps up to help Bean maintain that defensive nightmare on the perimeter?

Also considered: Zane Martin, New Mexico; Marvin Coleman, UNLV; Makuach Maluach, New Mexico; Seneca Knight, San Jose State; Kwame Marble, Wyoming; Omari Moore, San Jose State; David Roddy, Colorado State;  Aguir Agau, San Diego State; Orlando Robinson, Fresno State

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

[protected-iframe id=”09e6ca4e11e5838c3834d87c7b471ffb-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]