Report: Longhorns add the 2018 leading rusher in Division II to the roster

The Longhorns have signed Gabriel Watson of Sioux Falls as a graduate transfer. This gives Texas four running backs on scholarship.

The Texas Longhorns have added another running back to the roster according to a report from Horns247. In a recent media session following their latest scrimmage, head coach Tom Herman said he was apprehensive about playing the upcoming season with just three backs on scholarship. On Wednesday they added a top rusher from FCS (Division II).

Gabriel Watson led the FCS in rushing in 2018 while playing for Sioux Falls. As a sophomore runner he finished with 26 touchdowns and nearly 2,000 yards on the ground for University of Sioux Falls. This gives the Longhorns a fourth running back after Daniel Young opted out of the season.

Adding Watson will be huge for the Longhorns depth at the position. Herman mentioned the position is very violent and he can rest easy knowing that he will have another capable back. Currently the team has Keaontay Ingram, Roschon Johnson and Bijan Robinson as the three active backs. Ingram and Robinson were both held out of the scrimmage on Saturday for precautionary reasons.

Watson joins the Longhorns as a grad transfer after missing most of last season with an injury. Chip Brown was the first to report the signing.

Contact/Follow us @LonghornsWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas news, notes and opinions.

We have a forum and message board now. Get in on the conversation about Texas Longhorns athletics by joining the Longhorns Wire Forum.

Will Alabama have to pay the $3.5M for cancelled non conference games?

It might be easier to just pay the original contracted fee. But then again, maybe each of the three teams would be content with rescheduling

After the SEC made the decision at the end of July to play a conference-only schedule, one of the first questions that began being asked was, “what happens to the non-conference teams?”

It’s a question that begs to be answered, considering that many second-tier FBS schools and FCS schools rely on the financial revenue from matchups against teams like Alabama.

Alabama had scheduled home games against Georgia State on Sept. 12, Kent State on Sept. 26 and Tennessee-Martin on Nov. 14. Now that all three games have been cancelled, what happens now?

According to a report done by USA Today Sports, “Alabama signed contracts worth $1.3 million for the Georgia State game, $1.75 million for the Kent State game and $500,000 for the Tenn.-Martin game.”

For a school like Alabama, not playing the game doesn’t necessarily matter, but for a program like Kent State, the matchup against Alabama brings in almost 6% of its yearly revenue. When you think about it, that’s a lot.

To teams like the Crimson Tide, it’s normally just a “practice game,” while the smaller programs use the money to fund its athletic department.

Tennessee-Martin athletic Director Kurt McGuffin made the loss of the game clear,

“This news is regrettable but is a new reality. Losing a game of this magnitude is not only a disappointment for our players and fans, but also a reflection of the associated financial implications.”

So, what does Alabama do? Do they pay the contracted fees now, or simply reschedule the game for a later time?

According to Alabama Director of Athletics Greg Byrne, that’s a decision currently being worked through.

“Details regarding the non-conference home games that were on our 2020 football schedule are being worked through,”

It’s all in the contract.

That’s what the decision will come down to.

Each of the three contracts Alabama has with Georgia State, Kent State, and Tennessee- Martin says this: “In the event of … prohibitory or governmental authority, including that of the Southeastern Conference or the National Collegiate Athletic Association, making it impossible or impractical to play the game, both parties shall be relieved of any and all obligations of this agreement.”

But if for some reason the SEC’s decision to cancel the non-conference games meant Alabama’s matchup cancellations were a breach of contract, it could be a hefty punishment for the Tide, including having to pay both Georgia State and Kent State one million dollars each, while also having to pay Tennessee-Martin $500,000.

If Alabama simply reschedules the games, the fees could possibly be avoided. And that’s exactly what Texas A&M athletic director Ross Bjork is hoping for. He has offered to reschedule Texas A&M’s matchups against Abilene Christian, North Texas and Fresno State.

Georgia State athletic director Charlie Cobb said in a statement to The Tuscaloosa News (courtesy of USA Today Sports) that:

“In 2017, the American Athletic Conference made a unilateral decision to cancel our game against Memphis within weeks of its scheduled date for their independent desire to play more conference games. To their credit, the cancellation fee was paid promptly, primarily recognizing the hardship this last-minute decision placed on us.

We expect Alabama to do likewise as they have significantly more resources than Memphis.”

So, what should Alabama do?

At the point, it might be the simpler thing to just pay the original contracted fee. But then again, maybe each of the three teams would be content with rescheduling.

It’s a decision that’s never easy to make.

And for smaller programs, the decision, whatever it may be, could have a huge and immediate impact on their future.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3]

Ivy League cancels fall sports, could FBS conferences follow suit?

It was reported on Wednesday that the Ivy League has decided to cancel all fall sports.

Discouraging news continues to flow in regarding fall sports this year due to the current landscape of the COVID-19 pandemic.

On Tuesday, it was announced that the State Fair of Texas was canceled for the first time since World War II. How this may impact the classic Red River Rivalry game is yet to be seen as this is a fluid situation. However, both the Texas and Oklahoma athletic directors have voiced their optimism that the game will be played as scheduled.

On top of that, it was reported on Wednesday that the Ivy League, part of the FCS, has canceled all fall sports. CBS insider Jon Rothstein stated via Twitter that the conference will not entertain any sports until the beginning of next year.

While this isn’t necessarily an indication of what is to come for the FBS, it’s certainly worth noting. What could potentially save the Power Five conferences in terms of allowing them to play football this fall is the financial strain.

The FBS and FCS are quite different in terms of the national spotlight. The main indicator between the two is how a final winner is determined. The FBS hosts a four-team College Football Playoff while the FCS hosts a 24-team playoff for the NCAA D-1 Football Championship. FCS teams can only have 63 players on scholarship, while FBS teams can have 85.

The Ivy League has the freedom to make such a decision since they’re built on their educational superiority, while the FBS could suffer substantially. However, it’s still too early to determine what the FBS will consider.

There are several avenues to explore such as moving the college football season to the spring, shortening the schedule to conference opponents only, limiting fan attendance, etc.

Regardless of which route is ultimately taken, the public’s health and safety measures should be the ultimate priority.