Saints’ failed onside kick vs. Rams was part of an NFL-wide trend

The Saints’ failed onside kick against the Rams was part of an NFL-wide trend. Teams are 1-for-31 on recovering them in 2023:

This isn’t a stat you want to be on the wrong side of, but that’s where the New Orleans Saints found themselves. Head coach Dennis Allen chose to try an onside kick in the final minutes of Thursday night’s loss to the Los Angeles Rams while trailing a 30-22 deficit; but the kick was not recovered.

And as observed by the Boston Globe’s Ben Volin, NFL teams are now 1-for-31 when trying an onside kick in 2023. The success rate has never been very high on these plays (and the kicks that were recovered were often surprise onside kicks), but it’s still mighty discouraging to see just how much of a longshot this tactic has become.

Recent NFL rules changes banned a running start for the kicking team as well as how many coverage players teams could line up before the kick, citing safety concerns; the result is that teams now have a 3.2% success rate when trying to recover an onside kick.

So maybe teams (including the Saints) are better off just kicking it deep and hoping for a stop. They’ll have to get creative and search for other solutions with onside kicks going the way of the dinosaur.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Ranking all 32 starting QBs by success rate going into Week 11

Here’s how the top 32 quarterbacks and Zach Wilson compare in success rate heading into Week 11.

This season we have been ranking NFL quarterbacks by a different stat each week. This time around we’re trying a new one in success rate.

Here’s how the top 32 quarterbacks and Zach Wilson compare in success rate heading into Week 11.

Power Rankings: Eagles and Chiefs back on top, Seahawks up 2

Taysom Hill’s rushing success is just as effective as the ‘Tush Push’

Alvin Kamara is right. He says Taysom Hill running ability is equal to the “Tush Push,” and we’ve got the numbers to prove it:

Alvin Kamara is right. The New Orleans Saints running back gave his teammate Taysom Hill a big shoutout after their Week 9 win over the Indianapolis Colts, crediting Hill for his rushing ability — coming off a game in which Hill gained 63 yards off of just 9 carries, with Kamara not far behind (59 yards on 17 attempts).

In his postgame press conference, Kamara said that Hill “is the equivalent of the ‘Tush Push’. You know what’s coming and you can’t stop it.”

Also called the “Brotherly Shove” for its popularity with the Philadelphia Eagles offense in recent years, the play is a modified quarterback sneak that allows teammates to push the quarterback forward while blockers open up space ahead of them. Going into Week 9, the Eagles have converted a first down on 17 of their 21 attempts with this play (81.%). The rest of the NFL has a success rate of 72.7%, going 40-for-55.

And that brings us to Hill, whose success rate as a runner clocks in at 71.1%. Like other quarterbacks around the league who can make plays with their legs, he forces the defense to guard all eleven players, often forcing a moment’s hesitation that can make a big difference. Defenders still misjudge Hill’s speed in the open field and he’s one of the Saints’ best big-play threats as a rusher. His 20-yard touchdown run against the Colts was the longest gain on the ground for the Saints this season. They call his number for good reason.

Now, we should acknowledge something before the nerds points it out for us: these are two different success rates. The “Tush Push” numbers are only considering first down conversions. For Hill, we’re using the formula from Pro Football Reference, which considers what percentage of the yards needed were gained per carry. It’s a little more complicated, but it’s also more comprehensive, and it still gets to Kamara’s point.

But if we only want to look at Hill’s first down conversions as a runner, here they are: he’s moved the sticks 15 times on 38 attempts this season (39.5%), which trails a real “Tush Push” success rate. That’s still a solid number. He’s converted the eighth-most rushing first downs among quarterbacks this season despite his limited role; he isn’t a starter like Jalen Hurts (35 first downs), Lamar Jackson (27), Russell Wilson (18), or other league leaders. As Kamara said, teams know where the ball is going when Hill has it in his hands. And they’re still failing to stop him.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Derek Carr has one of the worst success rates among NFL quarterbacks

150 is a big number. It’s how many NFL games Derek Carr has started, and how many millions of dollars the Saints are paying him. But he isn’t meeting the expectations that come with it:

150 is a big number. It’s how many games Derek Carr has started in the NFL (including 149 regular season games and, tellingly, a single playoff game), and it’s how many millions of dollars the New Orleans Saints agreed to pay him earlier this year. But Carr isn’t meeting the expectations that come with that resume or that level of compensation.

Six quarterbacks have thrown 250 or more passes this season, and four of them have converted 90 or more first downs. The other two are Carr — with 76 first downs on 255 passes — and second-year starter Sam Howell. Howell has converted 80 first downs on 256 pass attempts. He’s started 8 games going back to last season. That’s the company Carr has put himself in, as opposed to other quarterbacks who have been doing this for a decade.

Carr’s bad habit of throwing short of the sticks has drawn criticism from Saints fans and mockery from his opponents, and the numbers bear it out. Pro Football Reference measures success rate as the percent of plays which gain at least 40% of yards needed on first down, 60% on second down, and 100% on third or fourth down. Carr’s current success rate as a passer is just 43.6%, which ranks 20th among the NFL’s 32 starting quarterbacks.

Look at more comprehensive metrics like quarterback rating (where Carr’s 82.8 grade ranks 20th) or PFR’s adjusted net yards per pass attempt (which has Carr at 23rd, with a 5.2 ANY/A) and you’ll see more of the same: he’s on the wrong end of the spectrum in terms of NFL quarterback play.

It wouldn’t be as big an issue if Carr were playing on the modest contract the Saints signed Jameis Winston to; his last two-year, $28 million deal would be more in line with someone performing at Carr’s level. That Carr is instead being paid to play like a fringe top-10 quarterback (his $37.5 million average per-year salary clocks in at 13th) makes it a problem when he’s closer to a bottom-10 passer (his success rate, again, is 20th).  If Carr can’t pick it up and meet the expectations set for him, he and his contract are quickly going to become an albatross holding this team back.

So what’s to be done? Adding a new receiver? Changing the play caller? The issues have almost varied week to week. Early this season everyone was (rightfully) concerned about the offensive line. The protection improved as the year continued, though injuries have wracked the unit in recent weeks. Chris Olave and the receiving corps have caught a lot of flak for running poor routes or not competing on contested targets. There’s some validity to that, but watch the tape and you’ll see receivers getting open and Carr not throwing to them.

What about a new play caller? Saints head coach Dennis Allen was asked about personnel changes coming out of the long break between last week’s Thursday night game and said that none were coming. But Allen responded with something interesting when the offense’s growing pains were brought up.

“I think it’s time for those to be done with,” Allen said in reference to the offense’s (and Carr’s) struggles. They’re running out of excuses after seven games with more poor performances than plays to be proud of. When asked what would happen if those things weren’t done with, Allen replied, “We’ll cross that bridge if we get to it.”

That was the first real criticism or negativity (soft as it was) that Allen has directed to his offense and quarterback this season, but it was needed. If anything he may have not been clear enough about where the team must improve. Carr has to play better. He has to be more aggressive and make better use of the weapons available to him. Panicking and throwing a no-hope pass to Alvin Kamara with defenders closing in hasn’t gotten in done yet, and it isn’t likely to win games any time soon.

Carr must perform like someone who has been on the field 150 times before. He needs to justify the $150 million contract the Saints signed with him. If not, he’ll go down and taken Allen and everyone in the building with him.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Advanced Stats: Cardinals first real Cowboys competition in months

Cowboys and Cardinals split in four critical win indicators with both teams featuring explosive offenses and stingy defenses. | From @ProfessorO_NFL

It’s Week 17 in the 2021 NFL season and the Dallas Cowboys are NFC East Champions. With the division wrapped up, Dallas can focus on seeding from this point onward.  Currently the No. 2 seed via a three-way tiebreaker with the L.A. Rams and Tampa Bay Buccaneers, the Cowboys have the potential to finish anywhere in the top four with two games remaining.

Coming off of a 56-point decimation of the Washington Football Team, the Cowboys are on a four game winning streak and sit at 11-4 on the season. Dallas will host the Arizona Cardinals in a Sunday afternoon game and at home, the Cowboys have averaged 38.4 PPG and 426.1 YPG.

Arizona is 10-5 on the season but have lost five of their last eight games after an impressive 7-0 start to the season. They are one game behind the Rams in the NFC West and currently hold the No. 5 seed. The Cardinals have played particularly well on the road this year with a 7-1 record, averaging 30.3 points per game and 2.5 takeaways in those games.

Each week we open up the Advanced Stat Notebook to analyze how each team ranks in EPA, DVOA, ANY/A and Toxic Differential. These four key metrics have a high correlation to win probability.

They tried it, but Washington can’t compare to Cowboys in advanced analytics

What areas are the WFT competitive with the division-leading Cowboys? A look at EPA, DVOA, Success rate and more metrics for Week 16. | From @ProfessorO_NFL

The Cowboys have three scenarios for clinching the division this week, and it’s wholly possible their work will be done for them before they hit the field on Sunday night. On Thursday, they earned a spot in the playoffs by virtue of the San Francisco 49ers’ loss at the hand of the Tennessee Titans, but just because others can and have assisted Dallas it doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be prepared to handle their own business.

The Dallas Cowboys (10-4) will host the Washington Football Team (6-8) on Sunday Night Football with the opportunity to give Cowboys fans a late Christmas gift.  The Cowboys are currently the No. 2 seed in the NFL and have chance to clinch the divisional title with any of the following scenarios: a win/tie over Washington, a Philadelphia Eagles loss/tie or a combination of 1.5 wins by LV, Jax, LAC, NE, MIN and Atlanta). All of those other contests happen earlier in the day on Sunday, but things still could come down to a divisional matchup.

The Cowboys are riding a three-game-in-three-week road winning streak, the first time they’ve accomplished this feat since 1969. They boast the No. 1 defense in the league on third-down conversions allowed (31.9%) and are tied for No.1 in takeaways with 31 on the season.

The Football Team is in the midst of a five-game stretch of NFC East opponents. They’ve lost the last two games to Dallas and Philadelphia and their playoff odds are getting increasingly smaller with each defeat. Some good news for WFT is that quarterback Taylor Heinicke was removed from COVID protocol and will be eligible to play Sunday Night.

Each week we open up the Advanced Stat Notebook to analyze how each team ranks in EPA, DVOA, ANY/A and Toxic Differential. These four key metrics have a high correlation to win probability. Let’s review this week’s edition to see which team will get presents and which will get coal.

Advanced Stat Notebook- Cowboys have edge in DVOA but EPA too close to call

When looking at the advanced metrics for Week 13, they favor the Cowboys but the margins are too close to call. Here’s a look at DVOA, EPA, Toxicity, ANY/A and Success Rate. From @ProfessorO_NFL

The Dallas Cowboys will head to New Orleans to play the Saints on Thursday Night Football.  Entering Week 13 with a 7-4 record, the Cowboys will look to bounce back from a Thanksgiving Day overtime loss to the Las Vegas Raiders. The Cowboys have lost three of their last four games to the AFC West, but will now face conference opponents for the remainder of the season.  There were a lot of additions and losses this week that are worth noting:  CeeDee Lamb, Amari Cooper and Demarcus Lawrence will return from injury while Terrance Steele, Mike McCarthy and five assistant coaches will miss the game due to COVID-19.

The New Orleans Saints currently have a 5-6 record and have lost four straight games.  The Saints played on Thanksgiving as well, losing 31-6 to the Buffalo Bills. The big news for the Saints this week is that Taysom Hill has taken first team snaps at practice at quarterback and is expected to start this week.  Head coach Sean Payton has not officially announced Hill as the starter over Trevor Siemian as they are monitoring Hill’s foot injury at practice.  They are expecting Alvin Kamara to return for the Cowboys game as well.

Let’s open up the Advanced Stat Notebook to see how both teams have performed this season using advanced analytics. Here’s a review of four key metrics to see if DVOA, ANY/A, Toxicity and EPA give the Cowboys reasons to feel confident about picking up win No. 8 on the season.

Cowboys lapping NFC East rivals in record, advanced statistical measures

The reason the Cowboys are running away with the division before Halloween? Take a look at how they outpace their NFC East brethren. | From @ProfessorO_NFL

Week 7 is in the books and the NFC East finished with a 1-2 record as the Dallas Cowboys were enjoying their bye week. The New York Giants picked up the lone win for the group as they handed the Carolina Panthers their third loss of the year to the division with an impressive, 25-3 victory. The Philadelphia Eagles faced off with the Las Vegas Raiders but fell 33-22.  The Washington Football Team traveled to Lambeau Field to square off with the Green Bay Packers but were unable to generate many points in a 24-10 loss.

Through seven weeks the division has a combined record of 11-16. The Cowboys currently have a 3.5-game lead with a 5-1 record. The Giants, Eagles and WFT are all 2-5, with Washington having a slight edge with a 1-0 division record. The Cowboys have almost equaled the combined win total of the other three foes. Beyond the records, are these teams any closer to competing with Dallas?

At CowboysWire, each week the division performances are reviewed using advanced analytics. In this study advanced stats such as Expected Points Added, Completion Percentage over Expected, Success Rate and more to determine how the Cowboys, Eagles, Giants and Washington stack up against each other and the rest of the league.  It will examine the whos, whats and whys to uncover the hidden science that determine the most important statistic of all, wins and losses.

Seahawks rankings in 9 important team numbers going into Week 7

Here’s where Seattle ranks in nine important team numbers going into Week 7.

By now you have probably heard that the Seattle Seahawks defense ranks dead last in the NFL in yards allowed per game, giving up 443.2 yards per contest. Yards will always be important, but this is also a somewhat facile way to evaluate a modern defense. In an era of advanced stats and efficiency ratings, there are certainly other numbers that are more compelling. Let’s take a look at some different stats to get a better idea of how good this team is right now in all three phases.

Here’s where Seattle ranks in nine important team numbers going into Week 7.

Brady vs Prescott: A one-sided battle is on tap in Cowboys-Pats

A look at the premium position in Sundays matchup between the Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots.

People love sports for different reasons. Sometimes, it’s the passion or the emotion associated with it. Families bond around Sunday afternoon victories (or wallow in the losses), and memories forge loyalty unlike anything else we experience. For me, I always liked football for its passion, but it was the mental aspect that made me fall in love.

The NFL is a 32-team chess match. This metaphor doesn’t just apply to the in-game strategy on Sundays, but the overarching philosophy a team chooses to deploy in roster construction and team-building as well. It means that the league is non-static, as each organization searches for the key that unlocks the next wave of success. That’s what makes this current season so interesting. Players like Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, Deshaun Watson, Dak Prescott and Russell Wilson are completely changing the landscape of what quarterbacks are capable of achieving. From a historical perspective, the current level of quarterback play is unprecedented.

At this point in time, there are several advanced metrics we can use to quantify the production of a team’s passing attack. I took seven of these metrics and made the effort to condense their information into two metrics. The rationale here is that we can combine information from the different stats to get an overall glimpse at player production (and two metrics fit into a graph more easily than seven). If you’re versed in statistics, this was done using principal component analysis, and the seven metrics used were:

  • EPA per Dropback
  • Success Rate (percentage of positive EPA plays)
  • Average Depth of Target (ADOT)
  • Sack Percentage
  • Interception Rate
  • Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt (from Pro-Football Reference)
  • Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE)

In doing this, a significant portion of the signal was condensed into the first two components. Here’s a graph of single-season QB performance dating back to 2009, filtered to show passers with at least 100 pass attempts on the season.

A little bit of information on how to interpret these composite scores.

The first component (X-Axis) is an overall indicator for passing performance. In essence, it rewards a player for the good stuff (EPA, CPOE) and docks them for the bad (sacks, interceptions).

The second component (Y-Axis) isn’t quite that simple.

Here, this isn’t so much an indicator of quality as it is style. In a way, this composite score is capturing the aggressiveness of a passer, as it scores higher for players with a higher ADOT and interception rate, but penalizes them for a high CPOE.

I’ve highlighted the quarterbacks for this week’s matchup.

In the upper-right corner we see Dak Prescott’s 2019 season. In terms of his first composite score, Prescott ranks third overall  just behind Aaron Rodgers’ 2011 MVP campaign and Drew Brees’s 2018 MVP runner-up year (neither highlighted).

There are several other 2019 quarterbacks in the upper echelon of the first composite which would seem to suggest that teams are now better at leveraging a player’s skills for passing efficiency than they were in years past.

But encouragingly, Prescott is performing at this level while maintaining an aggressive approach, a positive indication for the explosive capabilities of the Dallas offense.

On the flip side, we find Tom Brady’s 2019 campaign just slightly above the overall average. As the face of the NFL and backbone of an epic dynasty, we’ve grown accustomed to Brady orchestrating the New England offense to fantastic efficiency, but the 2019 campaign has not reached those levels of expectation.

However, if we look at how this first composite score correlates from one year to the next, Brady is actually performing right about where we would expect, based on last year’s results.

Conversely, there’s been a common theme from many that they didn’t expect to see this caliber of progression from Prescott, and his first composite score would echo this sentiment as he’s performing well above what we’d predict given historical trends.

But if we revisit that first graph, we also see Brady scores relatively low on the second composite score.

If we take a look at his air yards distribution this season, it’s not hard to see why.

Brady is attempting passes of short length at a rate higher than the rest of the NFL, and as a result he’s attacking the deeper part of the field less frequently.

To be specific, 56% of Brady’s pass attempts have come within 5 yards of the line-of-scrimmage. The retirement of Rob Gronkowski and a revolving door of receivers have certainly played a factor here. Another way to see this is to compare the completion percentage density charts of Prescott and Brady.

We can see here the vast majority of Brady’s targets are around the line-of-scrimmage, and naturally he completes them at a high percentage. However, we also see that he hasn’t found great success targeting the perimeter, especially beyond 10 yards. When Brady has found success down the field, it’s most commonly been down the seam.

Prescott’s 2019 season seems all the more impressive in this chart, as there doesn’t appear to be an area of the field he can’t own. However, the chess game continues on Sunday, as Prescott faces his toughest challenge in grand-master Bill Belichick.

Here’s hoping the evolution of Prescott and the NFL continues.

[vertical-gallery id=634743][vertical-gallery id=634702][vertical-gallery id=633628][lawrence-newsletter]