Best teams of the decade

From the professional ranks to the collegiate battles throughout all the divisions, some teams just had a better decade than others.

From the professional ranks to the collegiate battles throughout all the divisions and sports—looking at you, lacrosse and swimming—some teams just had a better decade than others. They may not have won it all, all the time. However, these schools and professional franchises either stood in the way of glory more often than not or totally reigned from atop Championship Mountain as a perennial 2010s juggernaut.

A quick note: We’re looking for the best here, and that means wins and titles! So if your baseball team crushed the regular season each year but bombed in the Divisional Series, it’s probably not making the cut—and no, I don’t hate your football team.

Here we go!

New England Patriots

Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports

Whether you like to admit it or not, the New England Patriots were the NFL’s 2010s. The full hot order. Count ’em out? That’s what coach Bill Belichick and Tom Brady loved for the general masses outside of the Boston area to do. And then, they’d pull it together and outthink, out-scheme—out videotape?—your team on their way to Super Bowl Sunday. Half of the decade featured the Patriots in the Grand Finale, with the team winning three times.

College coaches discuss substitution rule at national conventions

At the national convention of men’s and women’s college golf coaches in Las Vegas, substitution was a large part of the discussion.

Last week, the annual Golf Coaches Association of America and Women’s Golf Coaches Association national conventions took place in Las Vegas. College golf has undergone a fair amount of change over the past 10-15 years and for the most part, the convention is where many of those discussions take place.

This year, the hot topic was substitution. In fact, substitution has been a topic for a few years now. While substitutes have been allowed in the postseason for the past couple of years in men’s college golf, the concept has shifted to the regular season. A substitution rule was set to go into effect this past fall, but there are too many nuances still to figure out.

On the men’s side, a session was entirely dedicated to this topic during the convention but was also attended by members of the women’s committee and several women’s head coaches.

MORE: It’s time to consider allowing substitutes in college golf

The biggest hurdle for allowing substitutes seems to revolve around what it will do to a player’s individual ranking. What happens to a player who may play only one or two rounds of a 54-hole tournament? The fix would be to allow the rankings to be computed by round and not tournament, but what about the World Amateur Golf Ranking? A player who is subbed in or out mid-tournament would fall to the bottom of the leaderboard and take a loss to the entire field, which is why the collegiate rankings are examining the concept of round-by-round ranking.

The plan is to try to have all this in play for the 2021-22 season and use the 2020-21 season to examine how the details could work.

There is some pushback. Hallway discussions centered around why college golf even needs substitutes.

The short answer is to avoid a situation where a team would not be able to post a score if two or more players were not able to turn in a score. In a play-five-count-four format, there is only room for one player to withdraw or be disqualified. A substitute would still not be able to be inserted into a lineup until after a round is completed. A team would also not be required to bring a substitute, it would only be an option.

A show of hands in the room revealed that the majority of coaches are not in favor of allowing substitutes during the regular season, but it does appear the NCAA Division I Golf Committee is committed to finding a way to make this work. Another show of hands suggested that if a substitution rule were in play, most coaches would bring a substitute on trips.

There was continued discussion in Las Vegas about possible regional modifications. Several coaches are still trying to think of ways to reward a team that has played well during that season with a top seed and a hosting opportunity.

Note that regional fields for the men and women are set through the spring of 2022.

On the topic of regionals, there is discussion about the women of increasing from four to six regional sites in the future.

When the topic of standardizing tournaments was brought up, it led to very little discussion in the room.

On the women’s side, there is still hallway talk of the .500 Rule but not a lot of conversation about it in the sessions. Women’s programs will now have to turn in their schedule by Oct. 1. The deadline was set as a result of teams pulling out of an event, maybe due to conditions, even though the event is still being played.

Women’s coaches also talked about teams being allowed to play Grayhawk Golf Club in Scottsdale, Arizona, site of the NCAA Championship from 2020 through 2022. The rule previously did not allow teams other than host Arizona State on the course, but it was recently announced that rule will change beginning next year and leading up to the 2021 championship. The issue here was more missed class time and increased costs to make that trip. The men did not discuss this.

The USGA was also on hand and presented a proposal for modernizing its rules on amateur status, which is something the organization says it does roughly every seven years and now comes as a follow-up to the 2019 rules changes.

USGA officials on site did address the NCAA’s name, image and likeness issue. Right now, a business can help an amateur pay for expenses but can’t get anything in return (such as an endorsement from that player or having him or her appear in a commercial). The officials mentioned that could change in the future and said “there are some outcomes that could really be uncomfortable.”

The USGA is going to accept feedback through 2021, but could be forced to decide on some issues sooner than that.

Part of the proposal included that vocation would no longer be a breach, such as PGA membership and employment as a golf professional.

Notre Dame’s National Signing Day: Five Things to Know

Five-star wide receiver Jordan Johnson hadn’t announced if he was going to announce his signing on Wednesday and some took that as him not being thrilled with Chip Long’s departure and what it meant for his commitment.

 

The early period for recruits in the class of 2020 to sign their letters of intent is upon us and it promises to be a huge day for the future of Notre Dame football.

The first commitment was announced by the Notre Dame football Twitter account around 1:30 AM ET on Wednesday with the official announcement coming from German prospect, Alexander Ehrensberger, a three-star defensive end.

In what will be a huge day in shaping the landscape of college football for the next few years here are five things you should know about Notre Dame’s day:

1:  Size Matters (at least in rankings):

NCAA Bylaw 11.4.4 discussion with Joe Novak

NCAA Bylaw 11.4.4 discussion.

INDIANAPOLIS — College and high school football have been hit with setbacks since the NCAA implemented a rule preventing high school coaches being around players they previously coached.

The setback stems from the passing of NCAA Bylaw 11.4.4 in April 2017.

NCAA Bylaw 11.4.4 reads: “In bowl subdivision football, during a two-year period before a prospective student-athlete’s anticipated enrollment and a two-year period after the prospective student-athlete’s actual enrollment, an institution shall not employ (or enter into a contract for future employment with) an individual associated with the prospective student-athlete in any athletics department noncoaching staff position or in a strength and conditioning staff position.”

Former Northern Illinois head coach Joe Novak serves on the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions. Novak’s third and final term expires August 2020.

The former Northern Illinois head coach discussed NCAA Bylaw 11.4.4 in how it helps prevent schools in abusing the rule for coaches to follow players’ coattails for employment in college, while the rule also prevents coaches that have worked their way to being in position for a collegiate job the right way.

Tennessee head coach Jeremy Pruitt is an example of someone earning an opportunity from hard work at the high school level to an off-field position in college to further his career. Pruitt joined Alabama’s coaching staff as Director of Player Development, one year following serving as Hoover High School’s defensive coordinator.

The discussion with Novak can be listened to on the show ‘Tennessee Two-A-Days’ here.

Georgia football player enters transfer portal, per 247Sports

Per 247, a Georgia football player has entered the NCAA Transfer Portal

247Sports is reporting that a key special teams contributor has entered his name in the transfer portal.

Redshirt junior running back Prather Hudson, who is not on scholarship, has entered the NCAA transfer portal, per Jake Rowe.

Hudson is not on scholarship but has been a key special teamer and scout team player.

Hudson is set to graduate on Friday from UGA with a degree in finance.

The Columbus, Ga. native was a walk-on and will be eligible to play immediately at another division one program.

In three seasons he has 22 carries for 84 yards and 10 career tackles.

Notre Dame Football Well Represented on ESPN’s Top 150 Coaches List

Knute Rockne was the highest former Fighting Irish coach to make the list, coming in at three. He trails only Paul Bryant and Nick Saban on the list.

In honor of 150 years of College Football, ESPN and other publications have been releasing their lists of greatest all-time everything this year.

Earlier we went over the 150 greatest games list and the incredible games Notre Dame contributed to that list both good and bad.

Today ESPN released their rankings of the 150 greatest coaches in college football history.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that Notre Dame is again well represented.

First up – “Rock”

James Franklin Extended at Penn State: Who’d You Rather?

Since taking the Penn State job in 2014 he’s returned the Nittany Lions to glory, winning the Big Ten in 2016 before falling in the Rose Bowl to USC. What about Kelly?

News came down Friday that Penn State head football coach James Franklin has been extended through 2025, putting an end to rumors he’d end up at Florida State.

That got me wondering about where Brian Kelly ranks in terms of all college football coaches.

If Saban is the GOAT and Dabo Swinney is the next best thing going, how far down would you have to go in order to find Brian Kelly?

James Franklin took a program that was awful before and has again turned south since his departure into a pretty respectable team in his time at Vanderbilt.

Since taking the Penn State job in 2014 he’s returned the Nittany Lions to glory, winning the Big Ten in 2016 before falling in the Rose Bowl to USC.

He’s gone 55-23 overall since 2014 but 44-11 in his four years Penn State has played without any scholarship restrictions.

Residing in the Big Ten East is no simple life as Ohio State, Michigan and Michigan sit in your division and provide top-tier competition on an annual basis (OK, perhaps not Michigan State).

It gets me wondering though, which coach would you rather have if I were to give five years with each at the helm?

Brian Kelly took advantage of a generous schedule by year-three and had Notre Dame playing in (and getting blown out in) the national championship his third year on campus. Year-nine saw Kelly take Notre Dame to the College Football Playoff where eventual national champion Clemson routed them, 30-3.

Franklin has won at Penn State and in his first year without scholarship restrictions won the Big Ten. However, he hasn’t done so again and despite having a top-ten team this season, is yet to get back to that second Rose Bowl appearance.

I’m curious which coach you’d rather have going forward.

Brian Kelly appears to have an elite recruiting class taking shape for 2021, 11 years into his run.

Franklin again won ten games in one of college football’s best divisions and seems to have Penn State on a level they haven’t been at with any consistency since the nineties.

It’s a tough to make a choice and both coaches bring plenty of off-the-field drama with them.

But gun to my head, Kelly has shown an ability to hire quality assistants on the regular who often take head jobs elsewhere and find the next up-and-comer in the coaching ranks regularly.

That’s something Franklin is yet to show, as he has watched only Joe Moorhead leave, taking the Mississippi State job previous to 2018.

Although a longer tenure, Kelly has seen Chuck Martin, Matt LaFleur, Butch Jones, Bob Diaco and Autry Denson take head jobs elsewhere after being his assistants at various points the last decade or so.

The ability to hire quality assistants is so important to me and if Kelly keeps seeing assistants get head-jobs, it must mean he’s doing something right.

James Franklin is a very good college football coach and worthy of every dime he gets from Penn State.

But even if you complain about Brian Kelly on the regular, would you take Franklin over him given the chance?

At very worst that question is harder than you’d like to admit while truthfully, Kelly’s resume at Notre Dame is incredibly-difficult to compete with unless you’ve actually won a national championship.

Franklin’s extension at Penn State and the desire of other premier programs to hire him should make you appreciate Brian Kelly as a coach a bit more, even if you’re not entirely in love with him.

USC freshman Onyeka Okongwu is the 2020 NBA Draft’s top center

Throughout the beginning of his college career, Onyeka Okongwu has stood out. What makes him the top big in the 2020 NBA Draft class?

For a brief moment in time, Chino Hills was a basketball mecca. The California town with a population of 80,000 housed some of the nation’s most exciting basketball. In 2016, fans packed in to watch the best high school basketball team in the country dominate opponents on a nightly basis.

The Ball brothers — Lonzo, LiAngelo and LaMelo — headlined that 2016 juggernaut, dazzling crowds with virtuoso passes, busted ankles and Mariana-deep threes. Buttressing the paint was a freshman big from East Los Angeles by the name of Onyeka Okongwu.

Four years later, Okongwu is back in the spotlight, tearing up the hardwood a mere 40 miles away from his high school at USC. The 19th ranked recruit per RSCI, the freshman center has eviscerated his competition, emerging as one of the best big men in the country and earning my vote as the top big man in the 2020 NBA Draft, ahead of higher-ranked recruits like James Wiseman and Isaiah Stewart. Posting a per 100 line of 36 points, 18.1 rebounds, 5.8 blocks and 2.2 steals per game, a 65.3 true shooting percentage and 13.7 gBPM, he’s passed every test college basketball has tossed his way.

The center position in 2019 is an enigma. With the position becoming ever-more fungible, finding centers who shine in unique ways is more important than ever. While traditional rim-runner types still have value in this league, they aren’t difficult to find and are losing viability in high-leverage situations. Okongwu’s array of traits and skills inspire confidence for him as a serious value-add in the postseason. A physical specimen in the truest sense, Okongwu’s tools juxtaposed with his offensive arsenal project him as a good NBA player.

Beyond any level of nuance, one of the strongest predictors of NBA success is progress at the college level, especially paired with age. At 18 years old, Okongwu is producing like one of the best players in the country and in recent college basketball history.

The list of players since 2008 with college seasons of at least 10 gBPM, 65 TS%, 2 STL%, 5 BLK% and 20 dunks includes the following: Zion Williamson, Anthony Davis, Brandon Clarke, Udoka Azubuike, Xavier Tillman, Jordan Bell, DJ Stephens, Joel Embiid and Onyeka Okongwu. Though it is important to note Okongwu’s competition so far, he occupies the same company as some of the best college players ever, two of which are NBA stars and two more are ultra-promising rookies.

Notably, the only players in this group who hit those benchmarks in their freshmen seasons were Williamson, Davis and Embiid. It will be important to see whether Okongwu can sustain his level of production or something close to it but a spot on this list is noteworthy nonetheless.

Herculean in stature, Okongwu is a physical monster, not even considering his age. Standing 6-foot-9, 245 pounds with a seven-foot plus wingspan, Okongwu can play center at the NBA level despite his height. He annihilates his competition athletically; his frame combined with his powerful leaping, sturdy lower body and rare mobility is special.

Those tools fuel his elite defensive upside. We’ll begin with a highlight from the Orlando Invitational against Marquette in which nothing much happens, just a solid hedge and recover. This play encapsulates Okongwu’s freakish mobility and fluidity for a human of his size and strength. Okongwu moving around the floor is mesmerizing; he dances around the floor with speed and lightness of foot rarely seen among big men:

Comically large, Okongwu inundates smaller and less athletic opponents with his size alone. His length shuts down passing lanes without trying; he sticks his paws out and forces a turnover:

Okongwu’s primary allure on the defensive end is his projection as a high-level rim protector, with length, a springy vertical leap and acute help instincts protecting the rim. Sporting a 12.1% block rate, Okongwu blocks out the sun, swallowing any shot that approaches the rim. When ballhandlers pierce the lane, Okongwu springs into action, turning his hips, rising up and spiking the layup off of the glass:

Routinely guarding large swathes of the painted area, Okongwu’s sheer size has overwhelmed his competition. His timing hunting blocks and positioning in the paint are both impeccable; he steps up to help on the drive, flips around to face the ball and pins this shot:

His length pops off of the screen constantly; Markus Howard dribbles into a floater to combat the rim protection, but Okongwu doesn’t care and flicks his shot away from the rim:

Standing on two tree trunks, Okongwu is immovable in the post for most big men seeking buckets in his vicinity. That lower body strength helps him hold position and his length and vertical explosion clean up:

One of the more impressive facets of Okongwu’s defensive package is his discipline, verticality on contests and his aversion for fouls. Okongwu is fouling 4.9 times per 100 possessions, a staggeringly low number, especially for freshmen.

He’s fouling less than recent one-and-done bigs Jaxson Hayes (8.6), Jaren Jackson (8.6), Mo Bamba (5.0), Wendell Carter (6.0), Karl-Anthony Towns (8.8) and Joel Embiid (8.9). His ability to elevate and contest vertically is the cherry on top of his rim protection:

The ground Okongwu can engulf in a flash makes him a threat to erase shots ostensibly out of his vicinity. He surprises shooters unprepared to deal with his speed and length, sprinting out to knock this three off of its trajectory:

Okongwu’s ballerina feet and hip mobility aid him as a perimeter defender and make him legitimately switchable, an ultra-rare trait for a center. Watch and marvel as the behemoth Okongwu flips his hips, slides with the attacker, slips under the screen and calmly blocks his shot:

Graceful on the perimeter and domineering in the paint, Okongwu’s ultra-fluid feet and slippery hips allow him to routinely stick with penetrating wings and even some guards. When his speed isn’t enough, his stride length and wingspan are excellent corrective tools:

Aside from the occasional motor inconsistency, Okongwu’s positioning defending the pick and roll is just about average. With his violent hedges, Okongwu can overextend himself, sliding himself out of position, too far up to contain the drive. He stops a tad too high here and is blown by:

On the offensive end, Okongwu’s physical tools are the foundation for his offensive prosperity thus far in his college career. He’s too strong, mobile and explosive for many of his opponents. With real estate above the rim, Okongwu is a monster lob threats as a roll man on cuts. Though he isn’t a high volume roller (9.2% of his possessions come on the roll), his athleticism projects him well in that role in the NBA:

Adding to Okongwu’s potential as a roll man is his hands. Okongwu snares passes anywhere in his vicinity, holding onto balls in traffic and snagging dishes and converting layups:

As a scorer, Okongwu’s primary method of attack is out of the post. He’s obliterating defenders down low, placing in the 96th percentile on post-ups, shooting 77.6% at the rim with 20 dunks. Okongwu is one of two players this season with 20 dunks so far, only trailing the human Everest, Udoka Azubuike. Assuming he plays 30 games, which is conservative, he is on pace for 66 dunks, a feat only 56 players since 2008 have accomplished.

Aside from pure physical dominance, Okongwu sports elite touch and a deadly jump hook, floating in shots around the rim. Heavy pressure doesn’t deter Okongwu as he finishes tough shots through contact. He’s ambidextrous as a finisher, scoring comfortably with both hands:

Okongwu’s post scoring holds some value in an NBA context, but it is diminished in a league favoring pace and space. The important points to glean from his interior scoring are his finishing ambidexterity and, more importantly, his wizard touch. Touch and free throw percentage — he’s shooting a solid 76.5% — are the two strongest predictors of future shooting development.

Given Okongwu’s absurd displays of touch, it is difficult to envision a scenario where he doesn’t extend his range to the 3-point line and shoot at a fairly high clip on good volume. He’s already comfortable out to 20 feet or so:

Okongwu’s rebounding is another plus on his profile; he’s posting a 22 defensive rebound percentage and a 13.3 offensive rebounding percentage. He traps shots ricocheting off of the glass in his awaiting arms, keeping possessions alive:

The darkest blemish on Okongwu’s offensive game is his passing feel and the overall quality of his decisions. With a below-average 0.5 assist-turnover ratio, he is in score-first mode all of the time, which works out more than it doesn’t due to his tools and touch. Often times Okongwu will miss passes like this (granted this lob would require an advanced decision, but it’s makeable), but he draws the foul anyways

However, there are times when he needs to pass out of the post or make a pass he misses. There are obvious lanes to kick out to shooters on many of his trips to the hole, but Okongwu has tunnel vision and misses them often:

He has some warts handling double teams. When Okongwu can’t overwhelm two defenders, his decision making isn’t great, he falls into the double here and loses the ball:

As smart people like the Stepien’s Ross Homan have pointed out, Okongwu possesses some passing feel suggesting more playmaking upside than he’s shown. The film backs up this claim. In certain instances, Okongwu will flash glimmers of passing acumen which often doesn’t materialize into anything, like this post skip:

Or this pass to a cutting Agbonkpolo from a faceup position:

One situation where Okongwu does well as a passer is on high-low reads. USC plays two bigs on the floor for many of their minutes and Okongwu has improved finding bigs sealing on the inside:

The optimal decision here is to pass out to Utomi, exploiting the dig, but Okongwu’s inner daredevil shines through here. With the weak side defender facing half-court, Okongwu feathers a pass away from and over him, throwing the shooter open on a pristine feed:

Through the first nine games of his college career, Onyeka Okongwu has made his case as the 2020 draft’s top center. More than any other big, he combines the physical tools to hold up at the five along with a projectable offensive skillset necessary to survive in the modern NBA.

It will be interesting to see how Okongwu fares against conference opponents. For the moment, though, Okongwu looks like the best big in the class and a lottery pick.

[lawrence-related id=5943,2593,2561]

No. 16 Notre Dame Beats Stanford: 5 Quick Thoughts

The 2019 regular season comes to an end and 10-2 ends up the final record and along with it come some different feelings than we’d probably have expected had most of us been told 10 wins was happening back in August

It wasn’t the prettiest of starts but Notre Dame settled down impressively well, specifically after a blocked punt late in the first half that set up a touchdown to draw the Irish within a 17-14 deficit.

Shortly after Chase Claypool and Ian Book did what they’ve done so well together this year and gave the Irish their first lead of the game, 21-17 just before halftime.

From there the ball just rolled for the Irish who walked out with their tenth win of the season and first win at Stanford since all the way back in 2007.

The 2019 regular season has come to an end and in all likelihood a date in the Camping World Bowl awaits.  Here are your five instant thoughts from Notre Dame’s 45-24 victory at Stanford.

First up – More praise for Clark Lea