How the absence of a new CBA could dramatically alter the 2020 NFL offseason

“Final League Year” rules would leave many teams with difficult decisions.

For a brief moment, it looked like the NFL and the NFLPA were going to get these CBA negotiations over in a hurry. The league was going to get what it wanted (a 17-game season and expanded playoff field) and the players were going to get what they wanted (more money and relaxed testing for marijuana). Then the details of the league’s proposal were publicized, and it quickly became apparent that the two sides weren’t so close.

The owners were essentially asking many players to play those extra games for less money than they normally would make for a regular-season game. Here’s how the league explained it…

“Bonus payment of 1/17 of his paragraph 5 salary up to $250K to any player whose contract runs through a season when 17 games is played”

While some players would be getting their regular paycheck for that extra game, the higher-paid players would not. So it’s not a surprise that those higher-paid players weren’t huge fans of the deal. J.J. Watt tweeted this…

Which was liked by Russell Wilson…

And co-signed by Richard Sherman…

So, yeah, that deal is not getting approved by the players. What could that mean for this offseason? A whole lot actually! Let me explain…

When the last CBA expired, the NFL operated with no salary cap for the 2010 season. But it wasn’t just a Wild West situation. The league sent out a warning that any teams trying to game the system for future salary cap benefits would be punished. And that’s exactly what happened to the Cowboys and Redskins after both teams tried to take advantage of the uncapped year by structuring deals with most of the money coming during the 2010 season, which led to smaller cap hits in the following seasons.

In order to prevent that from happening again, the league implemented what a set of “Final League Year” rules. If the NFL and players association don’t come to an agreement over the next few weeks, those rules could have a major impact on how teams build their rosters this offseason.

Let’s take a look at those rules…

1. Teams are permitted to use both the franchise tag and transition tag

Under normal circumstances, NFL teams can only use one tag per offseason. In the Final League Year, that’s not going to be the case. This works out for a team like the Cowboys, who could theoretically use the franchise tag on Dak Prescott and use the transition tag on Amari Cooper. The transition tag allows a free agent to negotiate with other teams but his original team can choose to match the contract. It would receive two first-round picks from the player’s new team if it chose not to match the offer.

2. The 30% rule

While that first rule will help teams keep their top players on the roster, the 30% rule will make it difficult for teams with little cap space to sign their players to extensions. The rule prohibits teams from offering contracts that include an increase of more than 30% from a player’s 2020 base salary. Signing bonuses are not included in the calculation.

In other words … a team can’t give a player a contract that includes a 2020 base salary of $5 million and a base salary of $7.5 million the following season, as that would be a 50% increase. The max salary the team could offer that player in 2021 would be $6.5 million.

The 30% rule will affect a team like the Rams, who can’t afford to tag star linebacker Cory Littleton. Giving him an extension will also be difficult because they don’t have much cap space in 2020 and the 30% rule prevents them from giving him a lower salary in Year 1 before giving him a significant raise later on in the contract.

In order to fit Brandin Cooks’ contract under the cap in 2018, the Rams gave him both a roster bonus (which was guaranteed at signing) and an option bonus that would be paid in the second year of the contract (2019). An option bonus basically works the same as a signing bonus, only the player gets it in Year 2, so that first-year cap hit stays low. Cooks’ cap hit was just $5.4 million in 2018 but jumped to $15.3 million in 2019.

Here’s the problem: For the 30% rule, roster and option bonuses are included when calculating a player’s base salary. So while Cooks’ base salary actually decreased from $4 million in 2018 to $1 million 2019, his contract would not have been compliant with the 30% rule because of the $12.9 million he made in option and roster bonuses in 2019.

Unless a new CBA is signed between now and the start of free agency, the Rams will almost assuredly have to let one of their best players hit the open market.

3. No June 1 cuts/trades

With a CBA in place, teams would be able to designate players as June 1 cuts, which would move a portion of that player’s dead money charge to the following season. Welp, not in the Final League Year. If a team wants to cut a player, the full dead money charge will apply to the 2020 season regardless of when the transaction is made.

Let’s use Sammy Watkins as an example. He has a 2020 cap hit of $21 million, but only $7 million of that is guaranteed. In past years, the Chiefs could declare him a June 1 cut, which would be split his dead money in two and spread it out over two seasons. So a $3.5 million charge in 2020 and another in 2021. With no June 1 option, Kansas City will be forced to accept the full $7 million charge this season.

The June 1 rule applies to trades as well.

So without a CBA, teams may be less inclined to cut or trade a player with a lot of dead money left on his deal.

4. In-season incentives are counted against the cap immediately

Performance-based incentives fall into one of two categories: “Likely to be earned” and “Not likely to be earned.” The former counts against the salary cap as soon as the league year begins. The latter isn’t counted toward the cap until after the season.

Before we get into what’s different for the Final League Year, here’s how incentives are categorized:

Let’s say a player’s contract includes a bonus for playing at least 14 games. The league uses the previous season to determine whether or not that bonus is likely to be earned. If that player played in 13 games the previous season, it’s considered “not likely to be earned.” Had he played in 14 games the previous season, it would be considered a “likely to be earned” incentive.

If a player earns an NLTBE bonus, the team doesn’t have to account for the increase in pay until after the season, so teams can use those bonuses to give players more money without it costing them short-term cap space. Meanwhile, likely to be earned bonuses count against the cap at the start of the league year. Teams receive a cap credit if the player fails to earn the bonus.

In the Final League Year, a team must fit NLTBE bonuses as soon as they are earned. Teams will have to keep salary-cap space open just in case.

Let’s use A.J. Green as an example. A team could offer him a $5 million bonus if he plays in 8 games during the 2020 season. If he’s healthy, that’s a benchmark he’s definitely going to reach; but for salary cap purposes, it’s considered not likely to be earned, so it wouldn’t count against a team’s cap until after the season. In the Final League Year, if a team offers Green that money, they’ll have to keep that $5 million is space available throughout the season.

So basically all bonuses have to be treated as if they’re likely to be earned, giving teams less cap flexibility before and during the season.

[jwplayer NFSsv5Cx-q2aasYxh]

Formula 1: Explaining Mercedes’ wild steering wheel innovation

What exactly is going on with Lewis Hamilton’s steering wheel?

Testing for the 2020 Formula 1 season began this week in Barcelona, and the defending world champion Mercedes team baffled fans and analysts on Tuesday by unveiling what could prove to be a revolutionary new steering system.

It was noticed on Lewis Hamilton’s onboard cameras that the driver was pulling back his steering wheel toward his body as he drove down the Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya’s main straight, and pushing the wheel back into its normal position as he approached the first turn. Immediately, the F1 world went into a frenzy trying to decipher what Mercedes had developed, what the point of the new system may be, and even if it’s legal.

Mercedes have been somewhat vague about the applications of its new steering system, which is called “dual-axis steering,” or DAS, but the initial understanding is that DAS may allow the driver to alter the camber of the tire at certain points of the track.

Formula 1 are set up with some degree of toe-in or toe-out – the angle the tire sits upon the surface of the track. By triggering the DAS, the tire can adjust to allow the surface to contact the ground more evenly, which could help a driver control tire temperatures throughout the course of a race, or particularly, during a warm-up lap during qualifying. Former F1 driver Jolyon Palmer explained the system in a video you can watch on YouTube.

According to Mercedes technical director James Allison, the team has been in contact with the FIA about their development, and Mercedes believes that DAS is within the regulations. How much of a benefit will DAS provide? That remains to be seen – but it’s unlikely any other team will be able to copy the technology any time soon.

The first race of the Formula 1 season – the Australian Grand Prix – is under a month away on March 15th.

[jwplayer wRbvcm4O-q2aasYxh]

 

Grading the NFL offseason: Seahawks make low-risk, high-reward move with Greg Olsen signing

The Seahawks fill a need a month before free agency begins.

This NFL offseason, Steven Ruiz will be offering his thoughts and grading every major deal that goes down, including contract extensions, trades and free-agent signings.

Greg Olsen wasn’t unemployed for very long. The former Panthers tight end, who was released by Carolina earlier this month, agreed to terms with the Seahawks on a one-year deal worth $7 million, according to ESPN’s Adam Schefter. The contract includes $5.5 million guarantees.

If the Seahawks think they’re getting the All-Pro tight end we saw in Carolina before injuries took their toll, well, I have some bad news. But here’s some good news: While Greg Olsen may longer be at that level, he remains a valuable player and one who will fill a hole on Seattle’s roster.

Olsen is not the athlete he once was — the 4.5 40-yard-dash he ran at the 2007 combine is probably closer to a 4.7 now — but he still knows how to get open thanks to all the little tricks he’s learned over the first dozen years of his career. He’s a professional route runner who can run past slower linebackers or box out smaller safeties while lined up in the slot or isolated out wide.

Olsen’s 2019 numbers aren’t super impressive — he averaged 7.3 yards per target but most of the blame for that falls on the poor service he got from Carolina’s backup quarterbacks. Of the 82 targets he received last season, 22 were charted as “uncatchable” by Sports Info Solutions. Only three tight ends saw fewer off-target passes thrown their way.

This play pretty much sums up Olsen’s experience in 2019. He beats his man with some professional route-running only for his quarterback to miss wildly…

This should improve now that Russell Wilson will be the one providing him with targets. The partnership should be mutually beneficial, too, as Seattle has lacked a reliable slot target ever since Doug Baldwin announced his retirement. With Olsen out there, Wilson will have a tight end he can trust to get open and catch the ball on third down. He should compliment D.K. Metcalf and Tyler Lockett well with his ability to win in the middle part of the field.

You could do a lot worse than Olsen for $7 million. With Austin Hooper, Hunter Henry and Eric Ebron expected to sign longer deals with average salaries approaching the eight-figure mark, the Seahawks managed to find good value a month before the free agency period kicks off. That’s a good way to kick off what will be a vital offseason in the Pacific Northwest.

Of course, there’s a catch. A player with Olsen’s track record would typically command a higher number on the open market, but he’s approaching 35 and has missed an average of six games over the past three seasons.

The success of this deal will ultimately hinge on Olsen’s ability to stay healthy, but even if he does end up hurt, Seattle isn’t making a big financial commitment as this deal allows them to release Ed Dickson, who spent all of 2019 on injured reserve, and save $3 million in the process. And Olsen will likely have to play a full 16-game season to earn the entirety of his $7 million salary.

Grade: C+

[jwplayer 7wE0xoF9-q2aasYxh]

How to watch Tampa Bay Lightning vs. Colorado Avalanche TV channel, start time, odds

Tonight’s NHL stream between the Tampa Bay Lightning vs. Colorado Avalanche could be the debut of Blake Coleman after his trade.

As the NHL season gets down to its final quarter, the intensity really begins to heat up. That’ll be the case tonight for a top matchup between the Tampa Bay Lightning and Colorado Avalanche. You can watch the NHL stream live on ESPN+.

The Lightning have been on a tear recently, winning 10-straight games leading up to tonight’s matchup. They’re currently ranked second in the Eastern Conference behind the Boston Bruins by only three points. This could be forward Blake Coleman’s debut with Tampa Bay after being traded from the New Jersey Devils at the NHL trade deadline.

But the Avalanche are no slouch themselves, sitting in third in the Western Conference, down just two points to the Dallas Stars and St. Louis Blues. However, Colorado will be looking to stop a two-game slide in its tracks by picking up a statement win against top competition.

Stream NHL games all season on ESPN+. Sign up now!

How to watch Lightning vs. Avalanche:

Tampa Bay Lightning (39-15-5) vs. Colorado Avalanche (33-18-6)

Monday, Feb. 17, 9:00 p.m. ET

Pepsi Center, Denver, CO

NHL stream:

Lightning vs Avalanche live stream: ESPN+ or NHL.com

TV: Altitude TV, Fox Sports Sun

NHL odds:

The Lightning (-125) are 1.5-point favorites over the Avalanche (+105), according to BetMGM.

We recommend interesting sports viewing and streaming opportunities. If you sign up to a service by clicking one of the links, we may earn a referral fee.

Gannett may earn revenue from audience referrals to betting services.  Newsrooms are independent of this relationship and there is no influence on news coverage.

Just Did It: My long road to redemption on Nike’s SNKRS app

How Nike turned buying premier shoes into a game that you rarely ever win.

On Dec. 20 of last year I woke up a few hours before work and went for my phone. I opened Nike’s SNKRS app — a sneaker lottery app that gives lucky fanatics a chance to buy limited-edition shoes — and scrolled to make sure my entries were in for the Off-White Nike Dunks being released that day.

Going into this drawing, I was 0-for-37 on the app since I downloaded it in 2017. I’d gotten used to taking the loss. L after L after L. Yet here I was, refreshing repeatedly after the draw closed. I’d entered for all three colors being released (red, green and navy blue) and knew from past experience that results would be posted by color. So I sat and waited and refreshed.

I thought about my most devastating losses to date: The Travis Scott Jordan 4’s in June 2018. The Panda Dunks I swore I was going to snag in January 2019. The Sacai LD Waffles — you know, the green ones with the orange and black swooshes — from May of 2019. Name a design and I have a story of failure that comes with it.

My worst day ever on SNKRS actually came when Nike released its first set of Off-White shoes in collaboration with designer extraordinaire Virgil Abloh. Eight shoes from that collection, called “The Ten.” had been released on Nov. 20 of 2017, gradually appearing on the SNKRS app throughout that afternoon.

Before the first pair dropped, I did what I had to do. I set up payment info, my shipping address and everything else. Managed to get the pair in my virtual cart and tried to check out. They were stuck on “pending,” which essentially meant I was waiting in a virtual line to pick up the shoes off of Nike’s virtual shelf and then get in another virtual line to actually buy them.

After about a 10 minute wait, I was at the edge of my seat, face down with my head on my desk, just waiting on my verdict. Then, all of a sudden, my phone vibrates. I grab it, see the SNKRS notification, unlock it and swipe down, full of anticipation like I’m a 3-year-old unwrapping gifts on his birthday. And there it is — my first L of the day. “Didn’t get ‘em,” the app says, cementing my failure in virtual stone.

No need to fear, right? I’ve got seven more chances at other pairs. I can do this. There are more than enough sneakers to go around. Rinse, wash, repeat. L after L after L. Nothing but Ls.

And, honestly, that’s what I’m expecting on this day, two years later, a few days before Christmas, the holiday spirit all around and me feeling glum and already defeated as I scroll through the app. I lose out on the red pair. I lose out on the navy blue pair. It’s happening again. I should have figured.

Then it happens.

At 10:17 a.m. the notification hits: “GOT IT.”

FINALLY. The streak is dead.

Introducing the SNKRS app

By the time I got that unexpected W, I’d already started working on this story about the heartbreak NIKE had caused me, because I wanted to know if I was alone. Was anyone getting lucky? Was this all just a vast mirage … Nike leading a planet of sneakerheads on, only to disappoint us every time? I had to find out, so I asked sneaker Twitter about their personal SNKRS app journeys.

It turns out that most people had an experience similar to mine: Losses, mostly, but occasional luck. This is life for sneakerheads like me who don’t have a plug (an insider who gets me access to exclusives) or a bot programmed to put sneakers in queue as quickly as possible (yes, this exists.) We’re destined to lose, most of the time. But we come back. Nike makes sure of it.

The Oregon-based retailer launched its SNKRS app in 2015 as a way to give consumers access the latest and most sought-after drops.

It’s a sneakerhead’s go-to source for everything related to Nike releases. The app includes content about certain exclusive shoes, a calendar and even shows you what’s available for you to purchase right now. It’s supposed to make everything about the process of buying premier shoes easier.

That’s not how any of this is playing out in practice, though. The app only increases demand. It builds hype and then allows hundreds of thousands of people to try to buy. So the scarcity that fuels the sneaker and streetwear industries make copping anything of interest a Sisyphean task. If you stop to think about the process — and your odds — the sheer ridiculousness of it all might make you give up.

Nike has been coy about the logistics behind SNKRS, but we tried to get some answers. We asked for specifics about the Bred 11 drop from November 2019. We came with a list of questions

  • How many shoes were released, total, and how many were sold through SNKRS?
  • How many people did they estimate would try to purchase them?
  • How many folks, generally speaking, log on to the app for a drop like this?

Nike refused to share any of that information.  All of it is related to what the company calls “strategy and process,” a spokesperson told me, “which we don’t divulge as they are proprietary.”

So, generally speaking, without inside information, there’s no way to know how many pairs are dropping, nor how many people are trying to get them (the SNKRS app has been downloaded nearly 400 million times from the Apple store alone). There’s no way of telling where you are in line or how many people are ahead of you. If we’re being honest, most times the process is just a waste of time.

Yet, none of this is really new information. Sneakerheads know this coming in — how unlikely it is they’ll leave with what they want. But they still try.

The everlasting misery behind the L

“As far as in the morning, I have to have a cup of coffee and a shoulder to cry on.” This is how sneaker connoisseur and therapist Shawn Muth starts his weekends, he tells me.

Alert, ready and prepared for the worst, Muth picks up his phone and bounces between two SNKRS accounts to try and cop the goods. Does his strategy work? Depends on who you ask.

Muth has had some success. He’s won big exclusives like the Travis Scott Jordan 1’s and the Sean Wotherspoon Air Max 97/1 fusions (on the restock, he clarifies). Still, though, he’s left unsatisfied.

He’s just doing simple math. Since the app released in 2015, Nike has had hundreds of drawings and exclusive sneakers drop through it over the years. Muth says he’s entered in “literally every single one” and doesn’t have much to show for it.

“The percentage would have to be like 5 percent, maybe a little more,” Muth tells me. Sounds mad familiar, honestly.

Dion Johnson, editor in chief of Champagne in The Locker Room, shares the same story.

Johnson built a strategy out, too. His might be a bit more thorough. He relies on the power of the group chat. He found friends who were also tired of taking endless L’s on the app. They decided to try their hand at it together, working for each other to buy their favorite shoes.

Dion Johnson rocking a pair of New Balances at Nats Park

It’s simple: Somebody throws the notification of the drop into the chat, the rest of the squad says if they’re in or out and they try to cop enough pairs to satisfy everyone interested in the chat.

“If we have the money, we will try to cop for a homie who can’t get through,” he told me.

Has it worked? Not really. He says he’s about 4-30 in draws so far. Like everyone else, he’s often doomed to go to aftermarket sites like Stadium Goods or StockX to find what he missed out on … at triple the price.

“That’s what annoys me. I’m not paying all of that for a shoe. Retail is enough,” he said. “It’s wack that you’ve got to do all of this.”

It’s not all bad all the time for some. Young Park, a resident Washingtonian Sneakerhead, says his SNKRS record is 5-12. If you’re an NFL team that’s awful. For a sneaker lovers? GOAT status. Wild, I know.

How does Park do it? He simply picks his battles. If there’s an exclusive drop he wants, he’s more than prepared. “I set up reminders and alarms for it and I use all of my devices — phones, iPad, laptops — to get what I want,” he told me. Park puts in the work, but even he is batting less than .420. Even for those who are totally committed, a lot of this comes down dumb luck.

Just chalk it up to the game 

Nike has basically mastered the gamification of sneakers. The shoes customers are trying to cop have become tiered prizes, with Nike’s non-limited regular fare serving as a consolation. You buy the exclusives on the day they come out? Great, you win the game. You miss out? Go buy something similar that won’t quite hit the same but will fill your heart for the time being.

That’s the system. That’s how it works. It’s a never-ending cycle of misery and bliss for your average sneakerhead.

“It’s got to be the thrill of the chase,” Muth said.

Shawn Muth wearing the Nike React ISPAs.

Nike knows this. Their consumers are fanatics — they’ll do anything to get their hands on specific pieces. NIKE is catering to the most devoted.

“One pattern is pretty reflective of the fanatical community, it’s pretty hard core. They’re super engaged,” Ron Faris, the Nike vice president who oversees SNKRS. “They are probably the ones with the most knowledge that they’d like to share with others.”

Nike is very much hoping to grow and use its engaged audience, turning its content into something shareable. The goal is to create a larger community where those fanatics are sharing their culture with casuals who have a mild interest in sneakers.

Nike has already begun the process in expanding that reach. It is building out a digital strategy using the SNKRS app as a blueprint in other categories. Can it work with a category like, say, running apparel, that lacks the same exclusivity factor? We’ll see.

Shoes — sneakers, specifically — are just different. The love and passion doesn’t make sense; it’s irrational, but it grew organically. Sneakerheads live for the moment where someone walks up to them and says “Wow, you actually got those?” Those are the conversations that drive the chase. Those are the connections that are built through the shoes that most people miss out on. It’s hard to say if they can exist the same anywhere else.

“At the end of the day, I just love shoes. And I think Nike is genius for creating a method of social engagement for people like you and I with SNKRS,” Park said.

The wild thing about it? Nike knows exactly what it is doing. The company could easily drop more pairs of shoes and every single sneakerhead out there could get one. But that’s not the point. The point is failure — that’s what brings us back. It’s why why we feel the need to enter every drawing and try to get every exclusive sneaker in cart — we want to win. Nike needs me and all the folks like me to go 0-37 so that, on the 38th try when we finally hit, we don’t hesitate to pay. They want me to hop on Twitter and share my dub in a Tweet with all my friends. They’ve taken sneaker shopping and turned it into the thrill of a roulette wheel, and hoo buddy do people love to gamble.

Park’s SNKRS record comes with some big W’s seen here.

I wasn’t sure what would happen when I finally successfully got what I hoped for from the SNKRS app. Maybe the app would lose all the intrigue. Maybe I’d continue my chase elsewhere, through other avenues.

But then Nike brought me back in. A couple of weeks after the Off-White dunk released, Nike dropped another SB Dunk retro — the Rayguns.

You have to understand, these shoes mean something to me. I remember the first time I discovered them — it was 2007, I was a teenager, and, like every other teenager in the DMV (DC, Maryland, Virginia), I was obsessed with the rapper Wale.

I was a huge Wale fan back in my heyday. Still am, honestly. If I’m being truthful about it, he’s one of the biggest reasons why I love sneakers the way I do. He walked me down this path.  One of my favorite records from Wale, to this day, is a song called “Kicks.”

Second verse, a minute and 30 seconds into the song, he breaks out:

“Cheer for the green pack, I’m a Cheesehead

Rayguns on young make police scared

Pradas on a Monday, Dunks on a Tuesday

J’s on a Wednesday, mix it up the whole week”

Immediately, I took to the internet. I needed to know what these Rayguns were.

I thought about going to NikeTalk and asking what they were, but I was afraid of getting roasted for not knowing. Eventually, through Google, I found them. They were pricey, and I was 14, so they wouldn’t be mine.

As time has gone by, the OG shoe’s value on the secondary market has ballooned way out of my price range to over $1,000. They were always just a dream.

Well, until December, anyway. Nike re-released the shoes. They weren’t exactly the same as the originals, but close enough. I had to go for them.

The Roswell Raygun emblem on the Raygun Nike SB Dunks

And, for the second time ever, I won. I’m now 2-for-39.

Was it a message from the sneakergods? Nike’s algorithms understanding that I needed a perfect end to my story? Stupid luck? Who knows. All I know is I’m happy with my purchases.

Now, all that’s left to decide is what I’m keeping … and what I’m selling.

The Lions may not draft Tua Tagovailoa, but they should try to determine where he lands

Can the Lions leverage the hype surrounding Tua Tagovailoa? Because we all know it’s coming.

The first two selections in the 2020 NFL Draft are likely predetermined. LSU quarterback Joe Burrow will go to the Cincinnati Bengals at No. 1 overall while the Washington Redskins will pick Ohio State defensive end Chase Young.

At third overall, the draft gets interesting.

The Detroit Lions have a need at just about every position, except quarterback. Matthew Stafford enjoyed one of his best seasons of his career 2019. Of course, he also had a very tough year while his wife continued her battle with cancer. Stafford may find he wants to spend more time with her and less time with the Lions. So perhaps the Lions could use a quarterback, too. But it’s more likely they consider another position — and frankly, they need help at every position. Detroit fits the profile of team that should trade down the draft board.

That’s when Tua Tagovailoa comes into play. The former Alabama signal-caller looked like the obvious No. 1 overall pick until Burrow came out of nowhere to be comparable to Andrew Luck and Peyton Manning and Patrick Mahomes and Tom Brady and every G.O.A.T. draft prospect ever. (I’m being hyperbolic because that’s where the media is at with Burrow.) Tagovailoa is dealing with a hip injury, which seemed to briefly cheapen his draft value. But as his health should turn around just in time to give confidence to NFL teams, he will no doubt earn a spot as the No. 3 overall pick. More than one team will be willing to take him there. The hype will build steadily into the draft.

Strangely, the Lions are probably least likely to take Tua. Detroit should stick with Stafford. Tagovailoa is unlikely to be an upgrade, even when considering he’ll be on the rookie wage scale. Instead of drafting Tagovailoa, they should sell the opportunity to draft him to the highest bidder. The Dolphins, for example, pick at five and will likely have interest in the quarterback prospect. The Chargers, who have the No. 6 overall pick, will part ways with Philip Rivers. The Panthers, at seventh-overall, may trade quarterback Cam Newton. The Raiders could move up from 12th overall to take a quarterback. Bill Belichick and Nick Saban are bro-pals, and the Patriots may want Tua to succeed Tom Brady.

This is all to say that there is likely going to be competition to take Tua, and the Lions should leverage that competition so that Tagovailoa goes at No. 3 overall — to someone else. Detroit can essentially decide who gets the young quarterback.

[vertical-gallery id=894128]

WATCH: 49ers legend Jerry Rice says Super Bowl loss was ‘devastating’, rips officiating

Jerry Rice, the NFL’s all-time receptions leader, still bleeds red and gold for his San Francisco 49ers.

Jerry Rice, the NFL’s all-time receptions leader, still bleeds red and gold for his San Francisco 49ers, to the point that he won’t forget their Super Bowl 54 loss to the Kansas City Chiefs anytime soon.

In an interview this week with 95.7 The Game in San Francisco, Rice described how he felt watching the Chiefs erase the Niners’ 10-point lead in the fourth quarter

”It was devastating for me,” he said. “It’s something that I can’t get over right now. It’s going to take a while, and I’m hoping it’s the same way for the players.”

Rice pointed to bad officiating as a major factor in the loss, naming several moments throughout the game that didn’t sit well with him.

“The one right with Kittle right before halftime,” Rice said. “I’m like, ‘Are you serious? Come on!’ I understand if you really extend your arm, but let the players play.”

Even then, the three-time Super Bowl champ himself knows officiating wasn’t San Francisco’s only issue.

“You can’t make excuses or anything like that. We had a chance.”

WATCH: Pete Rose asks for reinstatement, citing Houston Astros’ sign-stealing scandal

Pete Rose is asking MLB commissioner Rob Manfred for another chance.

Pete Rose is asking MLB commissioner Rob Manfred for another chance.

USA Today Sports is reporting that Rose and his representation sent a 19-page letter to Manfred on Wednesday, asking for his name to be removed from MLB’s ineligible list. He was banned for life from baseball in 1989 for betting on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds.

Rose’s argument points to the Houston Astros’ sign-stealing scandal and Manfred’s hesitance to punish active players for their participation in a scheme that almost certainly changed the outcome of games.

Here’s an excerpt of the letter sent to Manfred from Rose’s representation:

“However, in recent years, intentional and covert acts by current and past owners, managers, coaches, and players altered the outcomes of numerous games, including the World Series, and illegally enhanced both team and player performance. It has never been suggested, let alone established, that any of Mr. Rose’s actions influenced the outcome of any game or the performance of any player. Yet for the thirty-first year and counting, he continues to suffer a punishment vastly disproportionate to those who have done just that.”

Rose petitioned Manfred to be reinstated in 2015 but was denied. If Rose were to be reinstated, he would be eligible for consideration for the National Baseball Hall of Fame.

Why the 49ers need to think about trading Jimmy Garoppolo

The 49ers’ Super Bowl window is closing rapidly and flipping the QB for draft picks is the only remedy.

The 49ers’ heartbreaking loss to the Chiefs in Super Bowl 54 has fractured San Francisco’s fanbase into two groups: One believes that Jimmy Garoppolo, who has started only 26 games during his career, is still inexperienced and just needs time to develop into the franchise quarterback they needed him to be against the Chiefs on Sunday night in Miami.

And then there are the realistic 49ers fans. The fans who see a 28-year-old quarterback who has been in this league for the better part of a decade now and is already two years into a contract that made him the highest-paid player in NFL history at one point in time. They also realize how short Super Bowl windows are — especially when that window is, in part, propped open by a dominant defense. There isn’t time to wait and see on Garoppolo. Windows open and close in an instant in the NFL. Just ask the Jaguars, Bears and Rams. Three teams that thought they had time to let their young quarterbacks figure it out … until they didn’t.

The 49ers should be a good team in 2020. Kyle Shanahan will still be cooking up the offensive game plans and calling the plays. It’s irrational to expect the defense to perform at the same level it did in 2019 (that doesn’t tend to happen with historically good defenses), but it will be good, at the very least. But simply “running it back” and hoping for a different ending will not go so well. The 49ers have to get better, and it’s going to be hard for them to do with their offseason resources.

(You’ll find the 49ers all the way on the left, toward the bottom … where no team wants to be on this graph.)

As a result of the trades for Dee Ford and Emmanuel Sanders, the 49ers do not have a pick in the second, third or fourth rounds of the 2020 NFL draft. They also have less than $20 million cap space, while several key players are headed for free agency, including Sanders, DE Arik Armstead and FS Jimmie Ward. The team will also have to give raises to exclusive rights free agent CB Emmanuel Moseley and do-it-all FB Kyle Juszczyk, if the 49ers pick up his club option for 2020. LT Joe Staley said before the playoffs that he isn’t thinking about retirement but it appears to be a distinct possibility the team will have to plan for. On paper, the 49ers were arguably the deepest team in the league but that will not be the case next season. They’ll have to let some of those free agents walk and do not have the draft capital or cap space to replace them

But there is one way to get more of both: Trade Jimmy G.

It would be a radical move, for sure — and one that a lot of 49ers fans would take issue with — but the team could save $22.4 million in cap space by moving on from the 28-year-old while also bringing back some much-needed draft capital.

NFL teams have typically balked at moving on from a competent QB even if it’s clear he’s not The One. Mostly because there usually isn’t an obvious replacement available via free agency or trade. But that’s not the case this offseason when there should be several viable replacements available, including Tom Brady, Philip Rivers, Jameis Winston and Teddy Bridgewater, to name a few. And it’s not like we haven’t seen Kyle Shanahan cobble together productive passing games with underwhelming talent at the quarterback position. Just last year, his offense allowed undrafted free agent Nick Mullens to average 0.13 Expected Points Added per dropback. Garoppolo averaged 0.19 this season … with a much better supporting cast and against an easier schedule, per Football Outsiders. San Francisco should not be afraid to re-enter the quarterback wild.

It’s really the only hope. If the rest of the 49ers roster is going to be worse off (and that’s looking like a certainty barring some offseason wizardry from GM John Lynch) an upgrade at quarterback is a must if this team is going to make it back to the Super Bowl.

The only resource they really have to make that upgrade is Jimmy G himself. There is just enough shine left on him — even after an underwhelming performance in the Super Bowl — to dupe some poor team into trading for a 28-year-old vet who still can’t get to his second read or throw consistently outside the numbers. The 49ers don’t have to dip their toes into the free-agent waters or draft a developmental QB prospect. They can just give Carolina a call and enquire about Cam Newton, whose future with the Panthers is still up in the air.

Newton would be a perfect cog in Shanahan’s offensive machine. The 49ers run game was already among the best in the league; now imagine throwing a run threat at quarterback in the mix. Opposing defenses haven’t stood much of a chance playing 11-on-10 in the run. Playing 11-on-11 against a Shanahan offense would be brutal, as we saw during the 2012 season when he was working with a rookie Robert Griffin III. Newton is also an underrated pocket passer who will allow Shanahan to call more dropback passes instead of relying on the tricks he used to make Garoppolo functional: play-action fakes and passes no further than five yards past the line of scrimmage. His menu of play calls would expand tenfold — and it’s already pretty robust as things stand.

Even if it’s not Newton, the 49ers need some change at the position, which should have been made clear after their postseason run. Shanahan made things so easy on Garoppolo during the playoffs, and he still couldn’t hold up his end. He threw the ball only 58 times over the course of three games and his passes traveled 7.6 yards downfield on average. Yet, Garoppolo still managed to throw interceptions on 5.2% of his throws. How bad is that? Well, Jameis Winston threw interceptions on 4.8% of his passes during the regular season and his average pass traveled 10.5 yards downfield. And it’s not like Garoppolo putting the ball in harm’s way was some new development. He threw 13 interceptions during the regular season and had another eight dropped by defenders. There’s a reason why Shanahan doesn’t ask him to do too much thinking.

The hope is that Garoppolo improves and eventually develops into a quarterback who no longer needs schematic training wheels to produce at the level he did this season. But I just don’t know how that happens if Shanahan is forced to keep those training wheels on for the sake of the team. The 49ers roster is built to win now, not to be in “develop a quarterback who is already 28 and gets paid like a top-tier passer” mode. “Practice” isn’t any better of an answer; Garoppolo has been practicing for six years now and still needs half-field reads to be comfortable in the pocket. The best-case scenario — or at least the most realistic one — is Jimmy G following the same developmental track as Kirk Cousins, where he incrementally gets better but never quite fully figures out the issues that make him a liability in the first place. I don’t think “Maybe one day he’ll turn into Kirk Cousins” is something any NFL fan should be hoping for.

Whatever the 49ers end up doing, moving on from Garoppolo has to be taken into consideration. The front office wisely gave itself an out when putting together his contract; it was essentially a front-loaded two-year deal with a team option. Most of the guaranteed money was paid out early (his salary cap number was $37 million in year one but is closer to $27 for the remaining three years). San Francisco will owe only $4.2 million in dead cap if it moves on now, and it has time to make that decision: $15.7 million of Garoppolo’s 2020 salary becomes guaranteed on April 1, well after free agency has begun.

Will they be smart enough to bail or will they continue down this path to nowhere? The 49ers defense isn’t going to get any better. And neither will the team if the quarterback situation doesn’t change sooner rather than later.

[lawrence-related id=892055,890411]

WATCH: Philadelphia Flyers’ mascot Gritty cleared of assault allegations

Gritty, the googly-eyed mascot for the Philadelphia Flyers, has been cleared of an assault allegation levied against him (err, it?) by a season-ticket holder.

Gritty, the googly-eyed mascot for the Philadelphia Flyers, has been cleared of an assault allegation levied against him (err, it?) by a season-ticket holder.

The Philadelphia Police Department shared on Monday that its investigation into the mascot has closed and that “the actions of the individual portraying the Flyers’ mascot did not constitute physical assault as alleged.”

Chris Greenwell, a Flyers season-ticket holder, filed a police report in December claiming that his son’s interaction with Gritty at a meet-and-greet-event in November left him with a bruise on his back.

Greenwell said that his 13-year-old son “playfully patted” Gritty on the head and that the mascot responded by punching the boy “as hard as he could.”

The Flyers released a brief statement on Monday: