Texas WR Jordan Whittington writes letter to Texas fans via The Players Tribune

Jordan Whittington doubted he could make it in football. What used to scare him now drives him.

Texas wide receiver Jordan Whittington returned to Austin for another season, but not for reasons you might expect. Whittington found security in his home away from home on the Forty Acres.

The Cuero product discussed his internal struggle in a letter to Texas fans via The Players Tribune.

“Tonight’s the NFL draft, but my name won’t be getting called,” Whittington shared. “I decided to return to Texas for one more year. At first … I just said the normal athlete things. We have unfinished business. I’m coming back to win the Big 12. I want to help lead our team.”

Whittington continued, “The truth is more complicated. It has to do with something you won’t hear that many athletes talk about: fear.”

Whittington doubted his ability to make a career in football. He felt a duty to provide for his family through a career in the NFL. Without it, he felt lost. Now, he’s using the uncertainty as fuel to be his best.

“I made the decision to come back for one last season at Texas, so I’m going to do everything in my power to make sure it’s special,” Whittington wrote.

The goals are still present. The Longhorns wide receiver still wants to make it in the NFL and help his team to its first Big 12 title since 2009, but it’s bigger than that. It’s about embracing the process of being his very best.

To read his full letter in The Players Tribune, click here.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbz52bnpekkafqb player_id=01eqbvp13nn1gy6hd4 image=]

John Wall keeps reminding us that even the steadiest among us sometimes need help too

John Wall is taking vulnerability to another level with his Player’s Tribune piece

The vulnerability John Wall has displayed over the last few years is to be commended.

The Clippers’ guard revealed to the world in a pretty matter-of-fact way that he’d contemplated suicide at one point or another over the last few years. He’d battled injury, been traded, lost his mom, and nearly lost a limb during that time, according to Wall’s most recent account of his struggles on The Player’s Tribune, in which he explained exactly why his brain took him to the deep, dark depths that it did.

In short, he felt he had nothing. Nobody was there for him. It’d gotten to the point where even the thought of his children losing their father wasn’t enough to convince him he needed to stick around.

“The one thing I always held on to, in the darkest times, was the thought of my boys — just the little things, like wanting to be around for their first day of school, or their first vacation. Or wanting them to see their dad play in an NBA game for real, and not just on some highlights from back in the day. Those thoughts held me down during a lot of hard nights. But if I’m being honest, even the thought of being a father wasn’t enough for me to get help. That’s how depression lies to you. That devil on your shoulder is whispering to you, ‘Well, maybe they’d be better off without you here.'”

That hurts to read. It would hurt to read if it were anyone, but it especially hurts reading this from John Wall.

To so many Wizards fans, Wall wasn’t just a basketball player. He was a hero. He was an idol. A community pillar. He lifted the Wizards up from basketball’s basement into relevance with his own two shoulders.

He gave so much of himself to the team, the franchise and the city. There were so many moments. Game 6. His game for Miyah. The Raptors sweep.

There were also the many turkey drives and backpack giveaways he’d put together for the community. He never hesitated to reach out and help people. He even paid people’s rent during the pandemic while he was on the way out.  So to know that this man who always seemed to be giving, giving, giving was pushed to the brink like that? Yeah, that hurts.

Thankfully, he’s still here. And it’s all because of six words, he said: “Yo! I need some f***ing help!”

That’s the message he sent a friend who then got him the help he needed. Those words are so important. And, at one point or another, we’ve all been there. Maybe not in a situation as dire, but we’ve been there.

Swallowing your pride is hard. Vulnerability is hard. But being open and honest about when you need help is essential, even for the strongest and most solid among us. Nobody is perfect. We all fall sometimes and we can’t get up. But, as Wall teaches us with this piece, being able to reach out to someone willing to lend a helping hand can literally save your life.

I’m grateful he did that and I’m grateful he’s finding the peace he needs through all the loss he’s endured. It sounds like he’s in a much better place and that’s what matters most.

The work isn’t done — it almost never is. The path back isn’t going to be an easy one. But, with help, he’ll get there. And we’ll be cheering him on every step of the way.

[listicle id=1964554]

Marcus Freeman pens letter to Notre Dame community

Are you all-in on the Freeman train?

Marcus Freeman has only been Notre Dame’s head coach officially for a handful of days but I feel safe in declaring something about him.

He gets it.

Lou Holtz once said about Notre Dame that those who don’t understand what makes it special, no explanation to them will suffice and that nobody who understands requires any explanation whatsoever.

I think it’s crystal clear at this point that Freeman is in the later.

Freeman penned a letter to the Notre Dame community through The Players Athletic that was released on Tuesday morning.  Check out the full letter here as some highlights include:

  • Stressing the importance of being himself as a head coach
  • Coaching not being now and never being in the future, about himself
  • A huge reason he sees as to why the 2021 Notre Dame team has gotten so much better as the year has gone on
  • Who he names as the best leaders he’s ever talked to – perhaps more noteworthy is who he doesn’t mention
  • The two main ideas of his leadership style

I’m not going to simply steal their letter and post it as my own like some places may do, but I’ll use certain things that are said in it and react to them in a matter of days after their link has made its rounds.

Related: The best images from Marcus Freeman’s introductory press conference

Just know that my main takeaway not from just the letter but from seeing how Freeman has handled this entire situation is that Notre Dame got the right guy.

Plenty more on that thought to come in the days, weeks, and months ahead.

Related:

Marcus Freeman discusses wild week that was with Dan Patrick

Notre Dame OC Tommy Rees talks all things Fiesta Bowl

Watch Marcus Freeman’s entire introductory press conference 

Longtime Notre Dame assistant is joining Brian Kelly at LSU

[vertical-gallery id=39978]

 

Big Ten players release “Unity Proposal”

Big Ten players released a Unity Proposal through the Players Tribune Wednesday of COVID-10 safety demands.

Just three days after players from the Pac-12 made a similar move, Big Ten players have also expressed concerns about the measures put in place to protect the health and safety of student-athletes amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

The “Unity Proposal” put together in partnership with the College Athlete Unity and The Players’ Tribune doesn’t go as far as the Pac-12 version in threatening to shut things down, but it does call for further protections to be put in place on the heels of the Big Ten’s release of a conference-only football schedule for 2020.

“While we appreciate the Big Ten’s recently announced plan for the upcoming season, we believe that the conference’s proposal falls short in certain areas,” Big Ten players said in a statement published through The Players Tribune. “Given that the players are the primary stakeholders in the business of college sports, we believe any course of action moving forward needs to include player input. We are deeply disappointed with the lack of leadership demonstrated by the NCAA with respect to player safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. We believe that the NCAA must — on its own and through collaboration with the conference — devise a comprehensive plan to ensure the safety and well-being of players leading up to and during the upcoming fall season.”

It should be noted, the Big Ten did release its COVID-19 medical protocols at the same time as the schedule release, with many of the demands from the Unity Proposal already included, but there are some that are not a part of what over 1,000 players have expressed concerns over.

Next … The full list of proposals from Big Ten players

Pac-12 football players say ‘NCAA has failed us,’ threaten to opt out of season unless demands are met

Players said they will opt out of the season if their demands, ranging from COVID-19 protections to ending racial injustice, are not met.

Football players in the Pac-12 feel they’re not being treated fairly by the conference and NCAA when it comes to critical issues, like health and safety during the COVID-19 pandemic and economic freedom, particularly related to the use of their names, images and likenesses. They also want the Pac-12 to address racial injustice in college sports and for leaders to protect the existence of some sports over the depths of their paychecks.

And if they don’t get what they want, they’re going to opt out of the season, they explained in an entry in The Players’ Tribune published Sunday with a byline that simply read: Players of the Pac-12.

In a news release Sunday, via ESPN, 12 athletes identified themselves as representing “hundreds of Pac-12 football players.”

Written with the theme of #WeAreUnited, they demand fair and reasonable treatment ranging from COVID-19 protections — safety wise as well as not losing a year of eligibility for opting out — to a 50-50 revenue share for athletes. They also ask for six-year scholarships “to foster undergraduate and graduate degree completion.”

They wrote, in part, in The Players’ Tribune:

To ensure future generations of college athletes will be treated fairly, #WeAreUnited.

Because NCAA sports exploit college athletes physically, economically and academically, and also disproportionately harm Black college athletes, #WeAreUnited.

In rejecting the NCAA’s claim that #BlackLivesMatter while also systematically exploiting Black athletes nationwide, #WeAreUnited.

Because we are being asked to play college sports in a pandemic in a system without enforced health and safety standards, and without transparency about COVID cases on our teams, the risks to ourselves, our families, and our communities, #WeAreUnited.

Because we must have adequate COVID testing to help protect our health, #WeAreUnited.

Because we are prohibited from securing representation while being asked to sign documents that may serve as liability waivers, #WeAreUnited.

And before listing their demands, they continued:

Because the NCAA has failed us and we are prepared to ensure that our conference treats us fairly whether or not it continues its NCAA membership, #WeAreUnited.

In forming alliances with college athletes from other conferences to unite with us for change, #WeAreUnited.

#WeAreUnited in our commitment to secure fair treatment for college athletes. Due to COVID-19 and other serious concerns, we will opt-out of Pac-12 fall camp and game participation unless the following demands are guaranteed in writing by our conference to protect and benefit both scholarship athletes and walk-ons.

Those demands include:

  • A third party enforcing player-approved health and safety standards regarding the novel coronavirus
  • A permanent civic-engagement task force “made up of our leaders, experts of our choice, and university and conference administrators to address outstanding issues such as racial injustice in college sports and in society”
  • 2 percent of conference revenue serving as financial aid for low-income Black students, as well as benefitting community programs for athletes on each campus
  • The ability to hire representation and earn money off their own name, image and likeness
  • Medical insurance for sports-related issues, including COVID-19, for six years after their NCAA eligibility ends

They call out the NCAA’s archaic rules preventing players, the vast majority of which will not play their sports professionally, from financially capitalizing on “the most valuable years of our lives” while generating revenue for everyone else.

They also want to eliminate “lavish salaries and facility expenditures” — and specifically call for Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott to “drastically reduce [his and administrators’] excessive pay” — in order to prioritize sports that have been cut. Specifically, they cite Stanford cutting 11 varsity sports and argue the school should dip into its $27.7 billion endowment to reinstate them.

Now, the NCAA and Pac-12 surely aren’t automatically going to give into the demands of athletes it insists are amateurs. And in a statement Sunday, the conference offered a statement that, unsurprisingly, leaves much to be desired. Via ESPN:

“Neither the Conference nor our university athletics departments have been contacted by this group regarding these topics,” a Pac-12 statement said. “We support our student-athletes using their voice and have regular communications with our student-athletes at many different levels on a range of topics. As we have clearly stated with respect to our fall competition plans, we are, and always will be, directed by medical experts, with the health, safety and well being of our student athletes, coaches and staff always the first priority. We have made it clear that any student athlete who chooses not to return to competition for health or safety reasons will have their scholarship protected.”

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Pac-12 previously announced it will play a conference-only schedule for the 2020 season, and Friday, it announced its schedule with the first games planned for September 26.

Read the full Players’ Tribune entry here.

[jwplayer ozpeFbYe-q2aasYxh]

[vertical-gallery id=936980]

Are Pac-12 athletes’ demands unreasonable? That’s not the point

Explaining the Pac-12 athletes’ demands.

Sunday, August 2, has given us a story which invites extensive discussion and reflection: Pac-12 athletes made a set of public demands in the Players Tribune, asking commissioner Larry Scott and the conference for various protections, rights, forms of recognition, and material benefits.

Many people will go line by line through the athletes’ list of demands — as though vetting a piece of proposed legislation — and assess the political possibilities for each demand.

Two of the players’ bigger demands, as directly quoted from the article:

“1. Distribute 50% of each sport’s total conference revenue evenly among athletes in their respective sports.

2. Six-year athletic scholarships to foster undergraduate and graduate degree completion.”

A lot of people are going to read those two demands and say, “Come on. That will never happen. Totally unreasonable.”

My first response: Correct. Those two things will never happen, at least not under present conditions.

My second response: Why does that make the players’ demands unreasonable?

It is a basic principle of negotiations to start with your strongest offer, the full amount or extent of what you want, so that in a negotiating process, making concessions can still leave you with a good chunk of what you initially asked for, which gives you a relatively satisfying result.

There is no point or purpose in making a limited set of incrementalist demands. Doing so merely limits the ceiling of what you want. Any subsequent compromises will take your already-small ask and erode it even more. Certainly in relationship to the 50-percent revenue share and the six-year scholarships, the Pac-12 athletes are appropriately asking for a lot, so that if they continue to push and protest, they might wind up with a 15-percent revenue share and a five-year scholarship.

Would that be a terrible result for them? I don’t think so.

There’s more to the story, however, than merely executing (or setting up) a negotiation strategy.

The Pac-12 athletes are negotiating in what can reasonably be viewed as a crisis situation for collegiate athletics. They know the football season in particular and the larger sports cycle (for 2020-2021) are in danger. They know conferences and schools are scrambling desperately to save a measure of revenue. They see that if there was ever a time to protest and demand more, this is it.

Are they wrong?

Ask yourself this question if you think the Pac-12 athletes are being unreasonable and/or full of themselves: If there was ever a season to sacrifice for the sake of protesting what one personally felt — as a football or basketball player — was a set of inadequate conditions, wouldn’t you pick this season, and this moment?

You can disagree with the choices these athletes are making. You can disagree with the terms they put forth. It’s a free country.

However, can we at least look at these athletes and say that while college football tries to ask them to play in a pandemic without hazard pay or guaranteed health care coverage, they at least have a legitimate point?

Can we at least do that?

The statement of demands is not just a negotiation tactic; it is a declaration that in this pandemic and economic crisis, athletes can’t just be pawns moved around as power brokers see fit. Athletes deserve a voice — and a place — at the table.

What they are bargaining for is — in a sense — secondary. The primary point is that they need to be able to bargain — and be heard — in the first place.

Pac-12 athletes publish set of demands to Larry Scott and the league

Huge news.

This had been brewing for weeks if not months. A lot of chatter had circulated throughout the Pac-12 that a group of athletes in the conference was preparing to either make demands of the conference or protest the attempt to play a 2020 sports season, if not both. Former Arizona State Sun Devil quarterback Rudy Carpenter was reportedly helping a group of athletes in formulating a specific approach toward a public action of some kind.

While Carpenter’s level of involvement is unclear, a group of Pac-12 athletes — the size and scope are currently unknown as of 10:35 a.m. Eastern time on Sunday — have finally put forth a public statement in the Players Tribune. You can have a look at the full article. 

Pac-12 expert Jon Wilner offered a good one-tweet summation:

So, you might be asking yourself and your friends: “What does this mean?”

It is the question I am asking myself. It is the question everyone is asking.

What is my initial response?

As I get older, and as I write more about sports — and as I see how politically tumultuous American politics have become — one of the central lessons I have learned as a news analyst is to withhold immediate judgment unless I have complete confidence in a given outcome. I find that it is generally best to admit I don’t know the answer if I can’t really nail it down on all (or most) fronts.

Such is the case here.

Sure, this COULD turn out to be a game-changer on so many levels. It COULD carry a lot of impact.

Yet, Saturday night brought about a lot of murmurings that the Power Five conferences might break away from the NCAA:

Who would take that seriously, at least right now?

The Power Five conferences couldn’t coordinate nonconference games among each other, so how would they possibly be able to coordinate the current set of NCAA-run sports championships on their own? It makes absolutely no sense in the current climate. A million other things would have to happen first for that to become a realistic possibility.

So, back to this Pac-12 athlete story. Does it mean the game has changed and that massive upheaval is just around the bend?

You would probably like an answer to that question from me or anyone else who covers college sports. Well, I’m here to tell you that the answer can’t really be known yet. Other things have to happen. It might be an unsatisfying answer, but many times in life, the unsatisfying answer is PRECISELY the answer citizens need if they want to get the straight story.

The bottom line, though — something which points to a direct answer instead of “I don’t know” — is as follows: The extent to which this player movement will change college sports (and/or affect the 2020-2021 sports cycle, including college basketball and baseball and all the other sports) will be connected to the extent players are willing to continue or intensify their protests.

If Pac-12 (and maybe other college) athletes are really willing to see this through, and not relent in their public pressure — if they have the stomach to keep pushing for a long time — this story will mean a lot.

If the athletes think this public presentation of demands is most or all of what they need to do to get the Pac-12 and college sports to change, this story probably won’t mean very much in the end.

Much more on this story is coming your way at Trojans Wire.

Malcolm Jenkins opens up about his “breakup” with Philly in heartfelt farewell letter via the Players Tribune

Malcolm Jenkins pens heartfelt farewell letter to Eagles Fans

After some back and forth about his value or worth to the organization, the Philadelphia Eagles divorced themselves from Malcolm Jenkins, allowing him to become a free agent.

Jenkins ultimately signed with the New Orleans Saints, the organization that divorced Jenkins five years ago, allowing him to become an Eagle.

Jenkins thanked the fans in a heartfelt social media post a few days ago, and then penned the proper farewell in a long-form essay written in The Players Tribune.

In the piece, Jenkins spoke about the city of Philadelphia literally “breaking up” with him, while addressing whether or not he truly wanted to leave.

Maybe this sounds crazy — but it really does feel like I’m going through a breakup right now. Like I’m breaking up with my city. And as with anyone unlucky enough to have to go through a breakup during the era of social distancing, I’ve had plenty of opportunity to reflect on our time together.

PHILLY. We were together for six years!! You saw me at my best and at my worst. You were always good to me, but more than that you were always real with me. And I will forever love you.

Trust me: Being an 11-year veteran in this league, I know a lot better than to let my emotions get the best of me. “It’s a business,” everyone tells you. And it’s like, Yeah, man, I know — it’s a business. No emotions. Got it. So I’ve made it a point to never get emotionally attached to a team.

But no one ever warned me about getting emotionally attached to a CITY!!

Jenkins went on to say that his favorite moment as an Eagle was when Super Bowl LII ended, he fell to his knees, and “it really began to sink in.”

Jenkins ended the essay thanking the city for “teaching” him so many things while making it clear that he did his best to carry on Brian Dawkins’ leadership and style of play.