MSU Basketball head coach Tom Izzo addressed Twitter criticism of Michigan State players

Some Michigan State “fans” have been criticizing the Men’s Basketball team on Twitter and Tom izzo has had enough.

[jwplayer mofEQR9L-PROpJzTY]

Michigan State Men’s Basketball came into the season with lofty expectations, and while they have been generally very good, some recent losses have had MSU fans griping on social media. While every sports team is subject to criticism, it can go too far, and head coach Tom Izzo has had enough.

After the team’s recent home loss to Penn State, Izzo addressed those ‘fans’ who have been making comments. Here are, in my opinion, the two most impactful quotes from that statement:

“If there’s any Michigan State people out there that are abusing some of my players on that freakin’ Twitter…I’m sick of it.”

“I get paid a lot of money so take your shots at me. But don’t take them on a kid who’s been a 3.7 student he’s done more for this university than most of those people have.. it’s despicable to me.”

You can watch the full video below:

[lawrence-auto-related count=3]

3 Key Takeaways: Michigan State Basketball loses to Penn State

Michigan State Basketball lost in tragic fashion to Penn State, 75-70 last night. Here are 3 key takeaways from this game.

[jwplayer a70MxOHB-PROpJzTY]

Michigan State Basketball suffered a tough loss at home to the Penn State Nittany Lions last night, 75-70. Michigan State brought it close towards the end but could not overcome Penn State. The Spartans are now 16-7 overall and 8-4 in Big Ten Conference play.

Here are three takeaways from this game:

1. Turnovers Haunt Michigan State Basketball

As a team, MSU ended this game with a whopping 15 total turnovers. The Nittany Lions capitalized on this high number of turnovers, shooting eight more shots than the Spartans. Turnovers always hurt but sting even more in close games. Penn State’s defense was on full display, forcing turnovers left and right throughout this game. Michigan State must work on reducing turnovers immediately. Especially during this crucial stretch in February.

2. Cassius Winston Needs Support

Cassius Winston is absolutely excellent but he needs help. Penn State trapped Winston and forced him to pass the ball away. Teams want other MSU players to make critical decisions in key moments, not Cassius. Winston scored 25 total points against Penn State. The bench contributed 18 total points and the other starting four players contributed 27 total points. Teammates can and will step up to help Cassius.

3. The Big Ten Is Really Good

I think people really underrate the Big Ten right now. Andy Katz put 10 Big Ten teams into his most recent March Madness Bracket Prediction. Competition is incredibly arduous and no game is an easy win. Even Tom Izzo gave credit to the impressive depth of high-quality teams in the Big Ten conference. I think more people will wise up to the Big Ten’s strength towards the end of the season, but, only time will tell.

Michigan State travels to the Crisler Center this Saturday for a 12 P.M. game. You can watch this game on Fox. Stay locked on SpartansWire for more MSU Basketball coverage to come.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1363]

Wisconsin displayed elusive balance vs Michigan State

More on UW 64, MSU 63

When following the trajectory of a basketball team — or any sports team — over the course of a season, it is important to not merely note certain realities or themes in isolation, but to keep checking up on how teams handle the emergence of those themes.

Do they preserve and sustain the good themes and reverse or eliminate the bad ones… or vice-versa? This is how we track various patterns and identify a reality of evolution and growth, or a situation marked by regression and erosion.

When Wisconsin — minus Kobe King and Brad Davison — needed it most, it produced the balanced and formidable scoring this team has always required in order to handle the toughest situations imaginable. We have emphasized this theme a lot. Saturday, it came to the forefront.

Wisconsin’s worst offensive games are the games in which only one or two players carry the workload, making other players less of a threat for the defense. This allows defenses to sag off in spots and take their chances by allowing certain players to shoot.

When three or four players are filling it up for the Badgers, so much more is possible for this group. The 2020 Badgers are a team without a superstar who can, a la Frank Kaminsky or Sam Dekker, don the cape and put UW on his back. It HAS to be a group effort. Evolving toward this ideal is a necessary part of a strong February and a good first weekend of the NCAA Tournament. Saturday, we saw what that looked like.

Nate Reuvers scored 15 points. D’Mitrik Trice scored 14. Aleem Ford scored 13. Brevin Pritzl added 10. Four players scoring 52 points, averaging 13 points among them. That’s what it will take… and all of this was done without Davison.

The fact that Wisconsin won under these circumstances was remarkable enough in its own right, without any added contextual details. The fact that Wisconsin generated such balance and depth without two players who had been starting a few weeks ago is that much more newsworthy.

Hopefully, this team will continue to make positive headlines in February after the headaches of the past week, which were temporarily dispelled on Saturday.

Wisconsin’s victory was impressive because it was so flawed

More on the Badgers’ win

What the heck is that story title? A win was impressive because it basically WASN’T impressive? What does THAT mean?

It’s not as contradictory or mysterious as it might seem. Let’s get right into this part of the discussion of the Wisconsin Badgers’ massive 64-63 win over the Michigan State Spartans on Saturday in the Kohl Center, which quieted bubble talk and restored confidence throughout the UW program.

This idea that Wisconsin’s win was impressive precisely because of its flaws comes from the reality that UW was shorthanded. This game was not supposed to be easy. Wisconsin was not supposed to thrive in the latter stages of a game in which it had a shorter rotation with players playing more minutes than they were used to. Not having Kobe King or Brad Davison virtually assured UW that it would have to labor through the second half, especially crunch time.

It seemed hard to think this game was going to be won without real adversity. More precisely, it seemed hard to think this game was going to be won, period.

Yet, in the first half, everyone’s expectations were turned upside down. Wisconsin was 15 of 26 from the field, 5 of 11 from 3-point range, and 8 of 8 from the foul line, a 43-point masterpiece with the kind of field goal shooting one saw against Nebraska. That was a remarkable display of basketball… and it certainly doesn’t represent anything close to this team’s normal level of performance. It was great, but it was aberrational.

Let’s imagine that Wisconsin had scored 43 more points in the second half and finished at 50 percent from the field for the game, winning 86-63 instead of 64-63. It would have been impressive, yes, but no one would have viewed it as sustainable. It would have been a one-off, hardly a realistic model or template for this team in the next six weeks plus the NCAA Tournament.

It would have been a fluke.

The way Wisconsin actually won is so much more real. It is more true to this team’s identity. It is more in line with UW’s weaknesses, not just its strengths. Wisconsin didn’t hit a single field goal attempt in the final 7:32 of this game. The Badgers scored just four points in those seven and a half minutes. That is the struggle bus this team was expected to ride without Davison on the floor. That drought embodied the adversity this team went through the past week, on and off the floor. That prolonged period of agony was consistent with this limited team’s characteristics.

The fact that Wisconsin overcame such a stressful, ragged, hard-to-watch ending sequence to this game magnifies what the Badgers achieved, rather than detract from it.

You might be skeptical, and that skepticism is warranted. Here is the simple nuance: If Wisconsin had King and Davison, I wouldn’t be writing about this. I wouldn’t spend any time praising a team for grinding to a halt on offense in the final 7:32. That wouldn’t be something to spotlight and praise — not to this extent, at any rate.

However, because Wisconsin was so shorthanded — because circumstances were so suboptimal, and because adversity was EXPECTED, not merely considered as a possibility — this defensive stand by UW strikes me as heroic, not merely avoiding another bad collapse.

If UW had a full roster, this win would have been a mere relief, an avoidance of something catastrophic. Because UW was playing in the face of severe limitations, however, due to the King exit and the Davison suspension, this one-point win — as nerve-wracking as it might have been for everyone — feels like a big triumph, not just a relief.

The defense — for Wisconsin and myself — rests its case on why the flaws of this win magnified the moment for the Badgers.

Xavier Tillman struggled, but Wisconsin still owned Michigan State

More on the Badgers’ huge win

There are always some skeptics in a crowd. For the Wisconsin Badgers’ fan base, I’m betting there are a few skeptics who are looking at Saturday’s 64-63 victory for UW and thinking, “We won this ONLY because Michigan State’s Xavier Tillman was so bad.” That isn’t the majority view, but there are a few of THOSE guys in every room. It’s simply the way it is.

Xavier Tillman’s bad day certainly had something to do with Wisconsin’s season-changing win. Tillman averages (rounded to the nearest whole number) 14 points and 10 rebounds. He shoots 55 percent from the field. Saturday in the Kohl Center, he shot 20 percent from the field — 3 of 15 — and under 20 percent on 2-point shots, 2 of 11. He did miss several shots close to the basket that he normally makes. On most days, he would go 8 of 15. If he had gone just 6 of 15, it still would have been a subpar day for him, but it might have been enough to make a difference for Michigan State. Yes, he was particularly bad; it was impossible to avoid noticing that.

Yet, one can note that Tillman had a bad day and still give credit to Wisconsin.

Tillman scored 15 points in the Jan. 17 win over Wisconsin. Saturday, he had only seven. Wisconsin definitely made life tougher for him. More than that, the Badgers made life a lot more complicated for Michigan State’s frontcourt. The Spartans’ frontcourt blew out UW’s frontcourt on Jan. 17, winning by 25 points, 48-23. In this game, Wisconsin won by 19, scoring a 36-17 advantage in the frontcourt. Going from minus-25 to plus-19 is a 44-point reversal. This wasn’t just about one player, though Greg Gard did say this was Aleem Ford’s best game as a Badger. This was mostly about Ford, but team defense in the paint made sure that Tillman had to shoot a four-foot leaner instead of getting a dunk.

That’s one of the fascinating things about basketball: Players normally make various kinds of shots, but if they get all the way to the rim, they will hardly ever miss. Wisconsin did allow Tillman to get fairly close to the basket on a few occasions, but the Badgers prevented uncontested layups and dunks. That was a manifestation of the toughness and resilience this team showed. Tillman had to make shots in the face of a challenge from a UW defender. Wisconsin asked tough-enough questions; Tillman was unable to answer them.

Luck was involved in this, but Wisconsin worked for its luck and earned it as well. Don’t lose sight of that.

Aleem Ford, Brevin Pritzl answer the call for undermanned Badgers

Aleem Ford and Brevin Pritzl stepped up

It was a matter of simple math: On Saturday against the Michigan State Spartans, the Wisconsin Badgers did not have two players who had been members of their starting five earlier in the season. Kobe King left, and Brad Davison was suspended. Greg Gard needed other players to play more minutes and better minutes.

Aleem Ford played only six minutes against Michigan State on January 17. He didn’t score a point. Brevin Pritzl did play 23 minutes in that game, but he scored only two points.

When the Badgers lost in East Lansing, 67-55, two players scored in double figures for the Badgers. Nate Reuvers had 19 points, D’Mitrik Trice 10. Doing simple math, that’s 29 points from Wisconsin’s two best and most talented scorers.

Guess how many points Reuvers and Trice combined for in this rematch with Michigan State? Yep: 29. Reuvers scored 15, Trice 14.

The supporting cast had to show up, and given that King and Davison weren’t on the floor for any of Saturday’s 40 minutes, that meant other players had to answer the bell, players who haven’t generally been at the forefront of this team’s offense this season.

Ford and Pritzl delivered the goods. Ford scored 13 efficient points on 5-of-6 shooting, while Pritzl contributed 10. Yes, they contributed in ways other than scoring, combining for 11 rebounds and three steals. Those were important, too. Yet, Wisconsin’s offense — which did die in the final seven minutes — had to have enough scoring punch for the defense’s superb performance to matter.

Ford and Pritzl gave Wisconsin the extra ounces of production it was always going to need in order to pull off the upset of Tom Izzo’s group with a shorthanded roster.

As a result of Ford’s and Pritzl’s big games, guess what happened? Wisconsin, for one of the rare times this season in Big Ten play, produced FOUR double-figure scorers. We have talked about that point a lot this season, begging the Badgers to develop a more balanced identity instead of Reuvers or Trice (or both) having to shoulder too much of the load. With two key players unavailable, this mini-crisis — this urgent moment — brought out the best in Ford and Pritzl.

This was a microcosm of the whole day for the Badgers: This game could have brought out UW’s least appealing, least attractive side. This game could have become a blowout loss, which would have darkened the gloomy clouds hovering over the program after a real trash sandwich of a week. Instead, the players rallied around each other and Greg Gard.

Aleem Ford and Brevin Pritzl rallied ’round the flag more than anyone else.

Greg Gard shuts up the haters in win over Michigan State

A mammoth win for Greg Gard

Do you think the title of this piece is sophomoric or juvenile or somehow unprofessional? I can completely understand if you do. However, sports are emotional, and while editors and writers generally like to think of themselves as reasonable, levelheaded people who are good at “calling balls and strikes” and being objective, let’s remember that we ALL have a bias. There is no true “bias-free zone” when offering analysis or interpretation of events.

We, as individual writers, bring our own worldview and our own experiences to each column or article we produce. We saw certain events unfold at certain times in certain ways; we were struck by those events from a unique angle and with a unique level of resonance only we, as individuals, felt. No one else had the exact same feeling. Very similar, sure, but not exactly. Our collections of life experiences belong only to ourselves, not any others.

From these individual experiences come debates or tensions or arguments in which we might feel strongly led to make a bold public declaration. Writing here as a news analyst and opinion-giver who tries to provide perspective on Wisconsin Badger football and men’s basketball, I usually aim to provide information and context on what is happening in the UW program and also the Big Ten. Most articles explore the bubble picture or (in football) the postseason or Big Ten West outlook, or will look at which player needs to improve or which facet of the team must be developed.

Once in a while, though, there will come a time to make a very authoritative statement, because something in the bloodstream of public commentary annoyed or irritated me, and it’s not productive to withhold these feelings entirely — most of the season, sure, but not completely. There are times when one has to put thoughts on paper (or a computer screen), even if some people won’t like reading them. Sometimes, one has to invite controversy — not as a regular way of doing business, not as a regular point of emphasis in writing about sports, but because the public debate has become unproductive and needs a readjustment.

We have reached that point in Wisconsin basketball.

I need to say this after the Badgers upset Michigan State with an undermanned roster: Greg Gard shut up the haters. He did.

The Kobe King saga, and all the tensions and recriminations which flowed from it, immersed Wisconsin fans in a nasty tug of war this week between the pro-Gard and anti-Gard camps. That’s just reality. I saw it on social media. I see it not just when I discuss Wisconsin hoops, but when Milwaukee-based reporters and other website commentators discuss the team. It’s time to put my foot down and say it:

Greg Gard deserves a lot more respect than what he has been receiving.

You might immediately reply, “BUT LOOK AT HIS SYSTEM! HIS TEAM ALMOST BLEW ANOTHER LEAD! WHY DIDN’T HE HAVE A BETTER RELATIONSHIP WITH KOBE KING?”

Those are all fair points. Gard does have his weaknesses, and I have NEVER tried to tell you he is the best thing since sliced bread, a walking God who never makes mistakes.

Gard has his flaws and limitations. I have been willing to point them out, especially Micah Potter’s minutes. If you have been following this space since I joined Badgers Wire last fall, you know this.

I have been writing about college sports for pay since 2000. That’s 20 years in this business. I started out as a green kid who blurted out hot takes left and right. I had to learn that if I wanted to call for a coach’s head when he performed poorly, I had to also give him credit when he did well. No one likes a homer sunshine pumper, but no one also likes the person who is a negative scold who always focuses on what’s wrong.

There is a larger discussion to have on this, and we will have that discussion in the coming days, believe me, but for now, can we just acknowledge this:

Wisconsin played VERY HARD for Gard on Saturday, on a day when it could have given up hope and decided to tune out its coach. That could have happened, and if it had, I’d be writing a very different column.

You see, that’s the whole point about sportswriting: I might have certain opinions about various people or topics, but if the facts of the day, the actual events of an important game, refute my previously held notions or inclinations, I have to write that my views changed. I have to write what I see in accordance with the actual story. I can’t look at events which refuted my beliefs and insist that my thought process or working thesis still holds up.

Greg Gard will almost certainly make the NCAA Tournament this year, in SPITE of all the crap which has gone on, in spite of the Howard Moore tragedy, in spite of Micah Potter being ineligible for 10 games, in spite of King’s departure and Brad Davison’s one-game suspension. Gard has clearly not lost his team; just the opposite. Every Badger went balls to the wall for him on Saturday, beating a Michigan State team which led UW by 25 points 15 days ago in East Lansing.

We can still criticize Greg Gard for all the times — and there are PLENTY of them — when he falls short. Can we give him a trucking BREAK, though?

Today, I think he earned it. Haters, shut up, will ya? Let’s have a more reasoned discourse instead of trying to run him out of Madison.

How to Watch Michigan State vs. Wisconsin, NCAA Basketball Live Stream, Schedule, TV Channel, Start Time

Watch Michigan State vs. Wisconsin Live Online.

Even with plenty of important games ahead of the team in the next week, No. 14 Michigan State better stay focused when it travels to Madison on Saturday to take on Wisconsin. The teams last faced each other on Jan. 17, with the Spartans winning 67-55 at home. In such a deep conference as the Big Ten, any game could mean a potential upset.

[protected-iframe id=”0d822fa22c40b2754e3a6cd705e271dd-58289342-150719707″ info=”https://fubo-preview.global.ssl.fastly.net/lp/preview/index-lite.html?params=irad%3D538235%26irmp%3D1205322%26pack%3Dfubotv-basic&page_slug=FOX” style=”max-width: 640px;” width = “100%”]

Michigan State vs. Wisconsin

  • When: Saturday, February 1
  • Time: 1:00 p.m. ET
  • TV: FOX
  • Live Stream: fuboTV (watch for free)

Badgers guard Brad Davidson has been suspended for one game after committing a flagrant foul in the team’s recent loss to Iowa. Combine that with news that Kobe King is leaving the program and plans to transfer, bench players will have to step into roles they aren’t accustomed to since both were starters. The Badgers (12-9, 5-5) were unable to win on the road in Iowa, losing 68-62 on Monday. The team was led by D’Mitrik Trice, who had 16 points and nine rebounds, along with six assists.

After an embarrassing 29-point loss to Purdue just a few weeks ago, Michigan State (16-5, 8-2) has rebounded and gone 3-1 since then and is No. 1 in the Big Ten standings. All of the wins were by double digits. In Wednesday’s game against Northwestern, Michigan State demolished the Wildcats by a final score of 79-50. While the Spartans went into halftime up by 11 points, the second half is when the team really turned it on, outscoring Northwestern by 18 points. The team was led by Cassius Winston, who had 18 points, along with two other players that scored in double digits. 

We recommend interesting sports viewing and streaming opportunities. If you sign up to a service by clicking one of the links, we may earn a referral fee.

Scoring variance could cut both ways in Wisconsin-Michigan State

More on Wisconsin-Michigan State

Saturday’s game between the Wisconsin Badgers and the Michigan State Spartans will be fascinating for many reasons, chiefly the absences of Brad Davison and Kobe King. Wisconsin will have a different rotation with extended minutes being provided by players who haven’t gotten a lot of playing time this season. That is enough of a plot point for Saturday, but if anyone needed more insights into this game, one of the other intriguing components is the notion of “scoring variance.”

In the January 17 meeting between these two teams — won by Michigan State, 67-55 — Aleem Ford and Tyler Wahl didn’t score a point. One can bet they will have to score a reasonable amount (seven-eight-nine points) for the Badgers to have any chance against the Spartans. Micah Potter scored just four points. Brevin Pritzl scored only two. If the Badgers get dramatic increases (and thereby, variance levels) from these players, compared to the Jan. 17 game, they could pull an upset.

This sounds hopeful, right? It should. However, Michigan State also has something to be confident about on the matter of scoring variance. Star guard Cassius Winston scored just six points on 3-of-12 shooting. Winston will very probably remember that performance and become determined to write a very different story in the Kohl Center. If Winston thrives — and remember, Brad Davison won’t be on the floor to guard him — it becomes very hard to see a Wisconsin victory…

… unless Micah Potter goes for 25.

Scoring variance is something to look for on Saturday, and not just from one team, but both.

Frontcourt scoring a problem for Wisconsin vs Michigan State

More on Wisconsin-Michigan State

Frontcourt scoring was a problem for Wisconsin in its first game against Michigan State two weeks ago. This might seem weird or even wrong to say, given that Nate Reuvers had one of his better games of the season on that night versus the Spartans. Reuvers scored 19 points on 3-of-6 3-point shooting. He pulled down seven boards and blocked two shots. He did his part.

The frontcourt scoring problem wasn’t related to Reuvers at all. It was related to the fact that all other Wisconsin frontcourt players scored a combined total of just four points, while Michigan State sent forwards at the Badgers in waves and got into the paint. Michigan State’s frontcourt produced 48 points from five different players. The final tally in frontcourt points from that game: 48-23 in favor of Michigan State. Depth, balance, and general physical superiority all carried the day for the Spartans against the Badgers, who didn’t have many answers.

A big part of this frontcourt disparity on Jan. 17 flowed from Aleem Ford playing just six minutes. With Kobe King and Brad Davison (who both played in that game) now unavailable for Greg Gard, one can expect Ford to play a lot more minutes on Saturday in Madison. How he performs will be one of the central keys to this contest.

It isn’t just Ford, however, who figures into this larger story. Micah Potter often gives Wisconsin good offense to offset his limited defense, but against the Spartans two weeks ago, Potter was ineffective at the offensive end of the floor. He scored just four points on 2-of-7 shooting and coughed up three turnovers. If Ford has to become a much more involved player against Michigan State (and he does), Potter has to become a much more efficient player. Then we could see the scales even out in the frontcourt battle between the two teams.

Wisconsin would also need backcourt help in this game, given that it lacks two starting guards. We will deal with that topic later. For now, simply appreciate how little Wisconsin got from its non-Reuvers frontcourt players against Michigan State. Changing that equation on Saturday is essential to a Wisconsin victory.