A lot of dominoes fell in just the right way for USC’s Lincoln Riley

TrojansWire.com editor Matt Zemek says USC coach Lincoln Riley had no clue about USC’s conference departure plans.

A lot of people claimed, mostly spurned Sooner fans, that former Oklahoma coach Lincoln Riley left Norman for sunny Los Angeles because he didn’t want to compete in the toughest college football conference that is the SEC.

Of course, that’s nonsense as anyone in their right mind that found themselves in that position would have made the exact same choice as Riley did. But one can’t help to think that maybe that choice was made a bit easier if Riley knew of USC’s plans to bolt the Pac-12 for the Big 10.

While the Big 10 will be a tougher conference to win on a regular basis with Michigan, Ohio State and Penn State on the schedule more times than not, the Trojans’ chances of making the College Football Playoff significantly increased by being in the Big 10. They’ll have a better strength of schedule and more revenue that could go Riley’s way via bonuses and whatnot.

So we asked Matt Zemek, editor of TrojansWire.com what he thought of the idea of Riley possibly knowing of USC’s departure plans when he was hired back in November. Just like Lee Corso, Zemek says not so fast my friend!

Industry insiders think there’s no way Riley could have known about this. That’s probably true, especially when you realize that USC Athletic Director Mike Bohn and UCLA Athletic Director Martin Jarmond reportedly didn’t talk over the phone about any of this until two weeks before the deal was announced, so that would be in the ballpark of June 15 (mid-June). This was kept quiet on a lot of levels, so to that extent, Riley was not informed.

However, Riley would still be at Oklahoma (most likely) if the Sooners had not moved to the SEC with Texas. That move upset Riley and created a new political situation at Oklahoma which Riley did not like. That move — OU and Texas to the SEC — is when rumors of USC and UCLA going to the Big Ten began to emerge. To that extent, Riley had a general awareness of the state of play. He probably just wasn’t informed by Bohn about the machinations of a move being underway.

A lot of dominoes had to fall Riley’s way for him to land in the sweet spot he currently is in. Now the question is can he take full advantage of it with recruiting and eventual championships in whatever conference the Trojans are in? Everyone associated with USC is convinced Riley can.

But in the next couple of seasons and possibly beyond, Dan Lanning and the Oregon Ducks would also like to channel Coach Corso.

Not so fast my friend!

[mm-video type=playlist id=01f27mq9z7hjgk6vc6 player_id=none image=https://duckswire.usatoday.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

USC’s reasons for leaving the Conference of Champions aren’t complicated

TrojansWire.com editor Matt Zemek says USC had a hundred million reasons for leaving the conference.

So after a century of history and tradition and a lot of domination on the gridiron, why would USC suddenly decide to leave the Pac-12 for the Big Ten?

This decision seemingly came out of left field and to make it worse, the Trojans and Bruins pretty much were holding hands and walking into the sunset that was the Pac-12. The two biggest schools took their ball and the biggest market on the West Coast for greener pastures. Now the other schools, including Oregon, are left scrambling.

It’s couldn’t have been just about the money, right? We went to USC insider and friend of the site, editor of TrojansWire.com Matt Zemek, for some answers. According to him, this wasn’t all that complicated.

It’s money.

UCLA in particular was drowning in debt. USC wasn’t in debt, but the Trojans stood to make tens of millions more dollars in the Big Ten. If any school president is offered several tens of millions of dollars each year, is that president going to say no? USC and UCLA are going to get a full share of Big Ten revenue. They stand to make at or above $100 million per year under a TV deal currently estimated to be worth $1.143 billion according to recent reporting from Pac-12 journalists and their sources within the media industry. USC was not going to turn that down.

Zemek also said that our old “friend” and former Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott was so bad at his job at negotiating the conference’s media deal that that those chickens are coming home to roost in the seeming demise of the Pac-12.

Larry Scott simply devalued the Pac-12 so much that USC didn’t have much of a choice. Scott also failed to tether the Pac-12 to ESPN when he had a chance in 2018. If he had done that, USC and UCLA would still be in the Pac-12.

Bottom line: it came down to the Benjamins and USC and UCLA just hit the lottery with the Big Ten. The Los Angeles schools had a choice of walking away from the cash or the conference. They made the smart move and took the money.

[listicle id=25773]

How big is the coaching advantage that the USC Trojans have over Oregon?

Lincoln Riley has years of experience. Dan Lanning has shown promise but is 0-0 as a head coach. Advantage USC, for now…

[jwplayer QXkxCJS6]

The two west coast college football powerhouses suddenly found themselves without a head coach in December. One was underperforming and had to make the change (USC) while the other was forced to make a change (Oregon) because the head coach left for the beaches of Miami.

Circumstances were different, but both USC and Oregon were in similar boats. When it came time to make a decision on how to go about a course correction, the two schools went about it in very different ways.

[lawrence-related id=18691]

USC went for the so-called sure thing by hiring an experienced coach who has won at the biggest levels college football has to offer in Lincoln Riley.

Oregon went for the successful, but inexperienced, hot-shot defensive coordinator in Dan Lanning who is proving over and over again that he is a master recruiter.

When it comes to recruiting, both Riley and Lanning seem to be on equal footing, although early on, their plans are hardly the same. Where the advantage goes to USC, however, is that Riley has proven himself as an in-game head coach. According to Matt Zemek, the managing editor of USA Today’s Trojans Wire, that advantage is significant.

[lawrence-related id=18910]

“Where Riley separates himself from Lanning, though, is on the field,” Zemek said. “Riley has turned one quarterback after another into an NFL prospect. Player development was abysmal under Clay Helton, but it is and has been superb among offensive skill players for Lincoln Riley at Oklahoma. USC now gets that Riley bump, and it’s going to be substantial. Riley as a play-caller is also excellent. He has proven how good he is over five full seasons at Oklahoma.”

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

However, Lanning played a huge part in helping the Georgia Bulldogs win the national championship over Alabama. While he’s shown his prowess as a coordinator, Lanning is an inexperienced head coach who was smart to hire experienced assistants that have been around the block. Defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi has college and NFL experience on his resume and associate head coach Adrian Klemm just came from the Pittsburgh Steelers and is a Super Bowl champion as a player.

[lawrence-related id=17674]

But nothing beats in-game experience, and Lanning is about to be thrown in the deep end of the pool as the Ducks open the 2022 season with Georgia of all teams. Everyone will find out if Lanning can swim. USC will definitely be looking on with an interested eye.

“Could Dan Lanning turn out to be a defensive genius on par with Riley? Sure he could, but he hasn’t been a head coach yet,” Zemek said. “Riley has five years of proven results. Lanning will get to change the conventional wisdom here. He will get his chance to alter the calculus on this topic. Right now, though, Riley has a reliable track record, and Lanning is just starting out. That’s not a criticism of Lanning, merely a reflection of where these coaches are in their developmental arcs.”

Lanning will get a chance to skew that developmental arc in Oregon’s favor in about seven months.

[listicle id=17625]

Discussing the future of USC, Utah football and their impact on other programs

Discussing the future of USC and Utah football potentially impacting other programs.

USC fired head coach Clay Helton on Monday.

The Trojans are searching to fill its head coaching vacancy.

Trojans Wire’s managing editor Matt Zemek joined the show “Football Two-A-Days” and discussed USC’s head coaching search.

Zemek detailed USC’s head coaching search, as well as the future of Utah’s program under Kyle Whittingham.

Zemek discussed candidates for USC, what direction Utah could go in if head coach Kyle Whittingham retired in the near future, and if both schools could have an impact on programs such as Tennessee.

The entire show with Zemek can be listened to here or below.

‘Josh Heupel’s Offense’ e-book now available

[vertical-gallery id=31910]

Season 2 premiere of Trojans Wired available with Don Smalley talking Beavers, Huskies

Season 2 of the Trojans Wired podcast is out with DucksWire’s own Don Smalley as the guest.

I had the privilege of being the guest of the Season 2 premiere of Trojans Wired with podcast host Matt Zemek and producer Ian Hest.

For this show, we didn’t talk Ducks! I know, blasphemy! But we did talk about Oregon’s most heated rivals of Oregon State and Washington. The Beavers seem to be confident on what Jonathan Smith is building on in Corvallis and Washington has some serious recruiting issues with coach Jimmy Lake missing out on some key guys. The Huskies are in the middle of the pack in recruiting and the fan base isn’t happy about it.

In the next few weeks, I’ll be on again to talk about the upcoming Oregon Ducks football season and what an exciting time it is to be a Duck.

Take a listen

 

SEC must decide if it wants to fight a world war in college sports

Will the Big Ten suffer from its decision to be the first Power Five conference to give up on the pursuit of fall football in 2020?

Editor’s note: This article was originally published by our sister site Trojans Wire and has been republished in its entirety below. 

It is a fair question to ask, though we won’t know the answer for a few years at the very least: Will the Big Ten suffer from its decision to be the first Power Five conference to give up on the pursuit of fall football in 2020?

Plenty of the people I follow on #CollegeSportsTwitter think — quite reasonably, I might add — that if the SEC, ACC and Big 12 want to have a true College Football Playoff, even though the Big Ten and Pac-12 have opted out, that is their right.

It’s a fair point.

[lawrence-related id=20443]

I have my reservations about holding a four-team playoff with only three major conferences left to play (if we’re able to play football at all), but the argument that the Big Ten and Pac-12 didn’t consult the other conferences, and therefore have to live with their own choices, is entirely reasonable.

After all, this wasn’t a group decision made by all Power Five conferences. EVERY conference is acting on its own, so if some conferences want to stop and other conferences want to play, there is no unanimous agreement on the ground rules. Therefore, the conferences sticking it out can reasonably claim to have the playoff — and the money from a playoff — for themselves.

I will address the playoff question in greater depth in a separate piece, but for now, I want to focus on this particular tension point: The Big 12 is a formidable conference, and Clemson of the ACC is a superpower, but we all know which is the strongest, deepest, toughest conference in major college football: It is the SEC.

The ACC was the best conference in the country in 2016, and the Big Ten has had its moments, but over the past three seasons, the SEC has been king, and there’s really no debate to be had. Georgia and Alabama vied for the 2017 title; LSU went unbeaten last year in a display of supreme dominance; Alabama made the 2018 title game with Georgia very nearly getting in the playoff as well. If Clemson isn’t winning the national championship these days, the SEC is. The SEC has placed at least one team in the national championship game of college football — BCS or playoff — in 13 of the last 14 seasons, the one exception being the 2014 season’s title game between Ohio State and Oregon.

[lawrence-related id=20402]

So, as we contemplate a world in which the SEC, Big 12, and ACC all try to play college football while the Big Ten and Pac-12 sit on the sidelines, the really big drama — bigger than all the others — focuses on the two richest and most powerful conferences in college sports, the SEC and the Big Ten.

By most if not all measurements, the SEC and Big Ten are the top two money-making conferences in college sports, with the ACC and Big 12 behind them and the Pac-12 struggling to keep pace. They jockey for position, and the positions (one versus two) might change from time to time, but the SEC and the Big Ten are the top two. They have been for many years.

With the Big Ten’s decision to step away from fall football, though, some people are wondering if political, economic, and recruiting-based blowback is about to hit the Big Ten.

Let’s say that happens. Will the blowback fade away… or will it stick?

We don’t know, but it’s a fascinating question to entertain.

[lawrence-related id=20367]

Let’s ask a follow-up question: What might cement a negative trend for the Big Ten?

A good answer: If the SEC not only plays football, but does so SUCCESSFULLY, with relatively minimal incident or disruption? If that DID happen, it would probably be a game-changer.

How much of a game-changer? Hard to say, but probably enough that a chunk of top-tier recruits who might have previously targeted Ohio State or Penn State would instead commit to elite SEC programs. While it might be just the thing Jim Harbaugh at Michigan would need to get a more level playing field in the Big Ten East Division, it could be a big negative for the Big Ten on a national level.

The SEC could push down Ohio State and create a long-term reality in which it will always have the upper hand against the Buckeyes in any possible playoff semifinal… and better yet, it might not even have to face Ohio State in many playoff games in the coming decade.

The opportunity for the SEC is obvious right now: If it can manage to play, it will turn some heads among recruits.

The obvious and necessary question to ask: Is it worth it in a pandemic, especially if players can’t be given hazard pay or guaranteed health care?

The obvious and necessary follow-up question: If the SEC isn’t forced to shut down its fall season in the coming weeks, and it gets to the point where it at least tries to play a Week 1 game, what will be the standards used by the league to either continue or discontinue play in the event of an outbreak on one SEC team?

[lawrence-related id=20352]

I have my own views of what the standards should be, but the point is less on setting a standard and more on the larger possibility that the SEC could be so consumed with driving a stake into the Big Ten that it overplays its hand and gets caught in a coronavirus web of its own making.

The SEC might think this is a World War I in college sports, a chance to destroy a rival conference. To be clear, I understand the rationale and can see why the SEC would go forward under these conditions. The Big Ten, one could argue, might have made a reasonable decision to shut down, but still conducted a TERRIBLE process which was slipshod, arbitrary and abrupt.

The SEC, by all appearances, is being cautious. It is certainly not a mistake to wait a few more weeks — that can’t hurt anyone — but if it dives into the lake known as Week 1 (playing actual live games) and then gets hit with a severe coronavirus outbreak, this could all boomerang back at the SEC… and the politics of recruiting might shift to the Big Ten in the end, undercutting the SEC’s prime goal.

The SEC could be entering a world war of college sports.

As with any decision to enter a war, one must consider the damage and the cost first, before considering the possible upside of victory.

First, do no harm, as any doctor or medical expert would tell you.

[lawrence-related id=20345,20343,20332,20321,20287,20271]