Trojans Wire looks at the spring transfer portal window on new show

USC has a spring portal wish list which begins up front.

The spring transfer portal window in college football is officially open for business. The USC Trojans need to get some work done in this window. Remember: They got Jordan Addison in the 2022 spring portal window. They got Bear Alexander in the 2023 spring transfer portal. They need some splashes if they want to lift the roster to the level of depth and quality they need to become a factor in the Big Ten Conference and the expanded College Football Playoff race this year.

Recent transfers out of the program have eroded the program’s depth, such that USC really needs multiple defensive linemen who are ready to instantly play and make an impact in 2024. The Trojans also really need one quality offensive lineman they can bring into the program and plug into a position, ideally at tackle. What other needs does USC have? We can debate how important the other position groups are, but there’s no question USC needs to beef up its two lines, mostly on defense.

We talked more about the spring transfer portal window with Mark Rogers at The Voice of College Football.

Visit our friends at Fighting Irish Wire, Buffaloes Wire, and Ducks Wire. Follow our newest sites, UW Huskies Wire and UCLA Wire.

Trojans Wire, Ducks Wire, and Buffaloes Wire 2023 Pac-12 football writer poll

Our 2023 #Pac12 football poll voters: @ZacharyCNeel @Donald_Smalley @Jack_Carlough @Matt_Wadleigh and @MattZemek.

College football season is here. It’s time for the last season of Pac-12 football, at least for the conference as we have known it. Next year everything will be wildly different. This is our final time to savor the familiar rhythms, rivalries and matchups of the Pac-12 that we have enjoyed for a very long time, ever since Arizona and Arizona State left the Western Athletic Conference to form the Pacific-10 Conference in 1978.

We gathered a panel of Pac-12 College Wire site writers to make their picks on the order of finish in the Pac-12 standings for 2023. Our panelists are Jack Carlough of Buffaloes Wire, Zachary Neel and Donald Smalley of Ducks Wire, Matt Wadleigh of Trojans and Buffaloes Wire, and Matt Zemek of Trojans Wire.

We will give you the consenus order of finish based on our five combined votes. We will provide the full vote tallies for each team in each position. We will then share each individual writer’s full order of finish for the Pac-12 football standings this year.

The envelope, please:

Does Notre Dame have a Tommy Rees problem?

What are your thoughts on Rees?

What came first, the chicken or the egg?

I ask that in regards to Notre Dame’s offense and the disaster it has been two games into the 2022 season.  The news for the squad that is averaging just 15.5 points per game to date didn’t get any better Monday as it was announced starting quarterback [autotag]Tyler Buchner[/autotag] is officially done for the year.

Related: Notre Dame updates depth chart ahead of Cal game

Now comes [autotag]Drew Pyne[/autotag] and the roughly 50% completion rate he’s put up in limited time through his first two years on campus. At least he has [autotag]Tommy Rees[/autotag] to help guide them though, right?

That’s what most Notre Dame fans would have thought this off-season if they were told Pyne would be called upon this early, but what about now?

Our friends at Trojans Wire are experiencing whiplash from how quickly they’ve seen a modern offense come storming into Troy, led by Lincoln Riley and Caleb Williams.  They’ve also now weighed in on a concern for Marcus Freeman’s time at Notre Dame, and related it back to the offensive coordinator and former Washington head coach Jimmy Lake’s demise.

From Trojans Wire (and do yourself a favor and read the entire piece):

Translated: Lake did not seek the best of the best on offense. He is a brilliant defensive tactician, but he dramatically underestimated the value of having a strong, top-tier coordinator on the offensive side of the ball. Head coaches with expertise on one side of the ball have to hire a top-shelf coordinator on the opposite side.

This is the connection between Jimmy Lake and Marcus Freeman.

Look, we know Tommy Rees can recruit, and that Notre Dame’s staff is an excellent recruiting staff. There are lots of things Freeman understands about the business … but at the coordinator level, you can’t do things on the cheap. You need a star play-caller. Tommy Rees could be a quarterback coach, but the keys to the offense needed to be handed to a master chess player.

Next: Back to the chicken-egg question in regards to Rees…

SEC must decide if it wants to fight a world war in college sports

Will the Big Ten suffer from its decision to be the first Power Five conference to give up on the pursuit of fall football in 2020?

Editor’s note: This article was originally published by our sister site Trojans Wire and has been republished in its entirety below. 

It is a fair question to ask, though we won’t know the answer for a few years at the very least: Will the Big Ten suffer from its decision to be the first Power Five conference to give up on the pursuit of fall football in 2020?

Plenty of the people I follow on #CollegeSportsTwitter think — quite reasonably, I might add — that if the SEC, ACC and Big 12 want to have a true College Football Playoff, even though the Big Ten and Pac-12 have opted out, that is their right.

It’s a fair point.

[lawrence-related id=20443]

I have my reservations about holding a four-team playoff with only three major conferences left to play (if we’re able to play football at all), but the argument that the Big Ten and Pac-12 didn’t consult the other conferences, and therefore have to live with their own choices, is entirely reasonable.

After all, this wasn’t a group decision made by all Power Five conferences. EVERY conference is acting on its own, so if some conferences want to stop and other conferences want to play, there is no unanimous agreement on the ground rules. Therefore, the conferences sticking it out can reasonably claim to have the playoff — and the money from a playoff — for themselves.

I will address the playoff question in greater depth in a separate piece, but for now, I want to focus on this particular tension point: The Big 12 is a formidable conference, and Clemson of the ACC is a superpower, but we all know which is the strongest, deepest, toughest conference in major college football: It is the SEC.

The ACC was the best conference in the country in 2016, and the Big Ten has had its moments, but over the past three seasons, the SEC has been king, and there’s really no debate to be had. Georgia and Alabama vied for the 2017 title; LSU went unbeaten last year in a display of supreme dominance; Alabama made the 2018 title game with Georgia very nearly getting in the playoff as well. If Clemson isn’t winning the national championship these days, the SEC is. The SEC has placed at least one team in the national championship game of college football — BCS or playoff — in 13 of the last 14 seasons, the one exception being the 2014 season’s title game between Ohio State and Oregon.

[lawrence-related id=20402]

So, as we contemplate a world in which the SEC, Big 12, and ACC all try to play college football while the Big Ten and Pac-12 sit on the sidelines, the really big drama — bigger than all the others — focuses on the two richest and most powerful conferences in college sports, the SEC and the Big Ten.

By most if not all measurements, the SEC and Big Ten are the top two money-making conferences in college sports, with the ACC and Big 12 behind them and the Pac-12 struggling to keep pace. They jockey for position, and the positions (one versus two) might change from time to time, but the SEC and the Big Ten are the top two. They have been for many years.

With the Big Ten’s decision to step away from fall football, though, some people are wondering if political, economic, and recruiting-based blowback is about to hit the Big Ten.

Let’s say that happens. Will the blowback fade away… or will it stick?

We don’t know, but it’s a fascinating question to entertain.

[lawrence-related id=20367]

Let’s ask a follow-up question: What might cement a negative trend for the Big Ten?

A good answer: If the SEC not only plays football, but does so SUCCESSFULLY, with relatively minimal incident or disruption? If that DID happen, it would probably be a game-changer.

How much of a game-changer? Hard to say, but probably enough that a chunk of top-tier recruits who might have previously targeted Ohio State or Penn State would instead commit to elite SEC programs. While it might be just the thing Jim Harbaugh at Michigan would need to get a more level playing field in the Big Ten East Division, it could be a big negative for the Big Ten on a national level.

The SEC could push down Ohio State and create a long-term reality in which it will always have the upper hand against the Buckeyes in any possible playoff semifinal… and better yet, it might not even have to face Ohio State in many playoff games in the coming decade.

The opportunity for the SEC is obvious right now: If it can manage to play, it will turn some heads among recruits.

The obvious and necessary question to ask: Is it worth it in a pandemic, especially if players can’t be given hazard pay or guaranteed health care?

The obvious and necessary follow-up question: If the SEC isn’t forced to shut down its fall season in the coming weeks, and it gets to the point where it at least tries to play a Week 1 game, what will be the standards used by the league to either continue or discontinue play in the event of an outbreak on one SEC team?

[lawrence-related id=20352]

I have my own views of what the standards should be, but the point is less on setting a standard and more on the larger possibility that the SEC could be so consumed with driving a stake into the Big Ten that it overplays its hand and gets caught in a coronavirus web of its own making.

The SEC might think this is a World War I in college sports, a chance to destroy a rival conference. To be clear, I understand the rationale and can see why the SEC would go forward under these conditions. The Big Ten, one could argue, might have made a reasonable decision to shut down, but still conducted a TERRIBLE process which was slipshod, arbitrary and abrupt.

The SEC, by all appearances, is being cautious. It is certainly not a mistake to wait a few more weeks — that can’t hurt anyone — but if it dives into the lake known as Week 1 (playing actual live games) and then gets hit with a severe coronavirus outbreak, this could all boomerang back at the SEC… and the politics of recruiting might shift to the Big Ten in the end, undercutting the SEC’s prime goal.

The SEC could be entering a world war of college sports.

As with any decision to enter a war, one must consider the damage and the cost first, before considering the possible upside of victory.

First, do no harm, as any doctor or medical expert would tell you.

[lawrence-related id=20345,20343,20332,20321,20287,20271]