Did the Commanders offer Raheem Morris the head coaching job?

The Commanders loved Quinn all along, but did have serious interest in others, too.

There is more discussion claiming the Commanders settled for Dan Quinn.

On Tuesday, Dan Patrick and his guest, Albert Breer, a senior NFL reporter for Monday Morning Quarterback, joined the list.

Patrick inquired as to what transpired with the Commanders being the last vacancy filled for this 2024 cycle.

The Commanders want a strong, durable general manager for the next decade, and the Harris group firmly believes Adam Peters is that guy. Consequently, Breer began explaining to Patrick this is why Bill Belichick and Mike Vrabel did not fit into the structure the Commanders currently desire. (How Mike Florio had been so insistent the Commanders wanted Bill Belichick remains unknown.)

Breer continued, “They wanted to be wide open about their process, so they had Zoom interviews with I believe, eight candidates. They brought seven of them back for in-person interviews, and they wanted to be open-minded about it.”

Then Breer divulged, “Raheem Morris almost got the job two weeks ago. The Falcons gave him an offer that made the Commanders really think.”

Breer expressed the Commanders then determined, “No, we really want to finish our process. We want to meet with everybody.”

“They were obviously interested in meeting with Ben Johnson. Um, that didn’t go so well (as Breer chuckled) on Monday as they got the news (from Johnson).”

“Then the final two were Mike Macdonald and Dan Quinn, and Seattle swooping in and grabbing Macdonald sort of clarified, simplified things.”

Patrick inquired further, “Did they want Dan Quinn? Did they settle for Dan?” Breer responded, “They love Dan Quinn, they do.” Patrick, unsatisfied again, asked, “But did they settle for Dan Quinn?”

Breer responded pointing to the common connections in San Francisco with Adam Peters there with Kyle Shanahan and other coaches having worked for Quinn in Atlanta. “So with Quinn, the references were great. He knocked the interview out of the park.”

“Is it as exciting a hire as Raheem Morris, Ben Johnson, or Mike Macdonald would have been? You know, maybe not. But Dan Quinn is somebody in high demand the last couple of years.”

“So I think ‘settled’ is the wrong word. I think they were just kind of committed to riding the entire process out, and because of that, they lost a couple of guys along the way.”

On Feb. 1, Chris Russell (The Team 980) stated Morris and Macdonald had both been offered the job and chose to go elsewhere. Russell has more than once also stated he was told by one in the Cowboys organization (during the season finale) that Quinn wanted this job.

Dan Quinn wanted the Commanders’ job before it was open

One source told a local radio host last month that Dan Quinn badly wanted the Washington job.

On Thursday, a local radio show host took great joy in being right about Dan Quinn being named the Commanders’ new head coach.

Chris Russell, the Team 980 host (1-4 pm, M-F), began his show with a bang. “We have something to be excited about!” Russell howled. “The Commanders have hired themselves a great head coach! That a boy, Adam Peters! That a boy, Josh (Harris), Magic (Johnson), Mark Ein, Mitchell Rales!”

Russell then reminded his listeners that he needed to be honest, admitting that Raheem Morris was his first choice when the process was launched. “Raheem Morris was No. 1 on my list. But Dan Quinn, as soon as Raheem Morris was off of the board, was the guy that I was hoping would get this job.”

“I told you guys, the day after the Dallas Cowboys game, the final game of the season, that I was told by someone in the Dallas Cowboys organization that Dan Quinn wanted this job and was very eagerly anticipating a call from the Commanders. He got it the next morning and wanted this job in the worst way.”

“Yelling into his microphone, Russell continued, “Boy Wonder, Ben Johnson did not want the job! The hell with him! Mike Macdonald didn’t want the job! The hell with him!”

“Dan Quinn wanted the job! (He) was aching to be the head coach of the Washington Commanders! And yet, some of you are already poo-pooing that, like you got a piece of discarded trash! People, adjust your prism. That’s absurd.”

Russell then reminded his listeners who were criticizing Quinn’s hiring that Quinn did not come to the Commanders because he would have all the power. He is not; he is working for Adam Peters, the GM.

The afternoon host then reminded his listeners that Quinn has much experience, having won an NFC Championship with Atlanta and gone 10-6, winning a playoff game the year after offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan’s departure.

His opening closed with Russell challenging his callers to call him and say why they do NOT believe in second chances for Dan Quinn when they certainly believe in second chances for themselves and their family.

Commanders Wire welcomes Dan Quinn to the Commanders. Hope you can get this thing turned around and enjoy a decade of success here, Dan.

Eleven Aggie football players named to the 2024 Reese’s Senior Bowl Watchlist

Texas A&M football has no shortage of veteran leadership as eleven players were named to the 2024 Reese’s Senior Bowl Watchlist.

A successful 2023 season for Texas A&M would not only mark a rebound for this football program, but it could also serve as a jolt for a handful of seniors preparing to make a leap to the NFL in the future.

The 11th Annual Reese’s Senior Bowl released its watchlist ahead of the 2024 exhibition in Mobile, Alabama. The Reese’s Senior Bowl is regarded as the preeminent college football all-star game and, for some, the first stage in the NFL Draft process.

Their scouting team has been hard at work in identifying the top-tier prospects at every level of college football for the 2024 NFL Draft, and identifying this year’s seniors is among the key staples of the evaluation process. As a reminder, the list does not include many true or redshirt juniors who could become eligible as of December 2023 (or earlier) graduates.

At first glance, the Maroon and White were well-represented, with 11 individuals highlighted. The full list of Aggie football players who landed on the Reese’s Senior Bowl Watchlist is as follows:

  • TE Max Wright
  • WR Ainias Smith
  • LB Chris Russell
  • OL Layden Robinson
  • DB Demani Richardson
  • WR Moose Muhammad III
  • DL McKinnley Jackson
  • DB Tony Grimes
  • DL Fadil Diggs
  • DB Josh DeBerry
  • LB Edgerrin Cooper

Texas A&M has no shortage of seniors with a practical chance of heading to Mobile for the Reese’s Senior Bowl. While the Aggies have a handful of sophomores projected as starters, many from their historic 2022 recruiting class, the Maroon and White will continue to lean on veterans at key positions.

Cooper and Russell are expected to be leaders of a linebacker unit with questionable depth. In contrast, Richardson is expected to mentor a secondary that could boast a potential breakout star in Bryce Anderson. Smith’s versatility speaks for itself, and it’s hard to imagine Bobby Petrino’s offense running smoothly without the wideout’s impact.

With one last ride on the football field around the corner, success in the fall could prove to be a stepping stone for many of these names, taking the leap to the next level in 2024.

Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes, and opinions. Follow Pete on Twitter: @PeteThreee.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=5]

Twelve Aggies will represent Texas A&M in the 2024 East-West Shrine Bowl

Ahead of the 2024 East-West Shrine Bowl, twelve Aggie football players will represent the Maroon and White on Feb. 1.

We’re just 42, yes, 42 days away from the end of “talkin’ season” and the start of actual Texas A&M Football being played inside Kyle Field, as the Aggies kick off their crucial 2023 campaign on Saturday, Sept. 2, hosting New Mexico.

Now, taking a sneak peek ahead to February, which is likely a dreaded thought for most, it was announced this week that twelve Aggie football players will represent the program in the 2024 East-West Shrine Bowl, which for the first time in its vast history will take place in my former hometown, Frisco, Texas at the Ford Center at The Star, the NFL’s Dallas Cowboy’s primary practice field.

Texas A&M’s 2023 season may already be marred by several media-obsessed storylines surrounding the program’s 2022 failures and how well Jimbo Fisher and new offensive coordinator Bobby Petrino’s “egos” will work in tandem. Still, focusing on the unscathed truths around what truly matters while gauging future success, the Aggies roster is stacked from top to bottom. Every player selected in the East-West Shrine Bowl is some of the best at their respective postion in the county.

  • Senior Punter, Nic Constantinou 
  • Junior Linebacker, Edgerrin Cooper 
  • Senior Cornerback, Josh DeBerry
  • Junior Defensive end, Fadil Diggs 
  • Senior Cornerback, Tony Grimes 
  • Senior Defensive Tackle, McKinnley Jackson 
  • Junior Wide receiver, Moose Muhammad III
  • Senior Safety, Demani Richardson 
  • Senor Offensive guard, Layden Robinson 
  • Senior Linebacker Chris Russell Sr. 
  • Senior Wide receiver (selected as a running back) Ainias Smith 
  • Junior Offensive guard Jordan Spacojevic-Moko

In response to the change of venue, Dallas Cowboys’ Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President, and Director of Player Personnel, Stephen Jones, described his excitement in bringing the game to Frisco and its continued effort in raising the profile for Shriners Children Hospital.

“It is a tremendous honor to host the East-West Shrine Bowl at the Ford Center at The Star next February,” said Stephen Jones “The game is a fixture in college football. We look forward to bringing the best college football players in the country to Frisco in the spirit of helping Shriners Children’s care for young patients around the world.”

Congratulations to all twelve young men for their selection ahead of what is hopefully a memorable 2023 season in College Station.

Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes, and opinions. Follow Cameron on Twitter: @CameronOhnysty.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=5]

Local Washington radio personalities have thoughts on another Commanders’ name change

Do you think new ownership should consider another re-branding?

[connatix div_id=”3f8b015acdd24c648befc5d5dac47469″ player_id=”afe1e038-d3c2-49c0-922d-6511a229f69c” cid=”7cbcea0d-4ce2-4c75-9a8d-fbe02a192c24″]

The Washington Commanders will officially have a new owner soon. Daniel Snyder finalized a deal with Josh Harris to become Washington’s next owner last week. While a few hurdles remain, namely the NFL Finance Committee vetting all of Harris’ minority partners, other NFL owners will eventually vote to officially welcome Harris into the league’s ownership circle.

It will happen. And when it does, many questions face Harris and his group, but he will do so with an entire community and fan base willing to embrace him.

ESPN obtained a copy of Harris’ prospectus recently, and it contained lots of information. One of the things not mentioned was another potential name change.

Washington first changed its name from the “Redskins” to the temporary moniker “Football Team” for two seasons until arriving at the new name, “Commanders,” in Feb. 2022.

Some fans have been upset about Washington’s name. Many believed you had over 18 months to arrive at a better name and that the 2022 version of the Washington NFL franchise felt like an expansion team with new uniforms and a new name but retaining the franchise’s rich history.

Other fans were more welcoming to the new name. Some have embraced the new name; as most pointed out, winning will eventually cure everything.

Maybe it will; maybe it won’t. The one thing Snyder had on his side, the last bit of goodwill he had remaining with some fans, was the old name. Once he changed it, due to public pressure, that was it. For many — right or wrong — the name change, not the multiple investigations into Snyder or the franchise, was the final straw for the embattled owner.

Since it became known that Snyder was selling the team, one of the main topics on social media is, “Could the new owner change the name to something better?”

As many have noted, including those covering the team closely, a name change isn’t near the top of Harris’ list of priorities. However, that hasn’t stopped some fans, and some on the radio passionately wanting Harris to potentially change the name from the Commanders.

This is a divisive topic. What Snyder has done to the once-proud franchise’s fan base is remarkable — in a bad way. The constant losing, the way he treated people, the investigations, and much, much more, have made Snyder public enemy No. 1 amongst Washington fans — those that remain.

It’s difficult to tell if another name change would bring some fans back, but it’s not happening. This week, two of the area’s more popular personalities took different sides of the name debate.

Kevin Sheehan of The Team 980, a longtime fan of Washington said the owners should absolutely consider a possible name change and that others have no right to tell those who feel strongly about the team name how they should feel.

He is right.

Here are Sheehan’s thoughts from earlier this week via his show, “The Kevin Sheehan Show,” courtesy of Ben Krimmel of Audacy.

“If they come to that decision that they are gonna stick with the status quo, I do think it would serve them to explain why and how they came to that decision,” Sheehan said of the new ownership group. “You do have a majority of fans, both past and present, that don’t want this current name and are in favor of a re-brand and in favor of a conversation of a re-brand.”

Sheehan then responded to a listener’s email regarding the new name.

“Yes, it is true, I’m not a fan of the re-brand, the name, the uniforms the whole thing,” Sheehan said. “Thank god I got them at least to change the crest with the accurate dates, you’re welcome. Yes, I’m not a fan of what was done. Hate it might be a little strong… but I know the old name’s not coming back.”

Everyone remembers the crest debate when they rolled out the new name, right? That was another embarrassing blunder that the team fixed but shouldn’t have gotten wrong in the first place.

One day later, Sheehan was asked about his level of enthusiasm for the franchise.

“I don’t view her as my ex; she’s still my current; I don’t have another, but I’m not an NFL bachelor,” Sheehan said. “They’re still my team, I’m just more apathetic in recent years than I would have ever guessed. But Dan is right – I find the lecturing, specifically on social media, from the people who say a rebrand being anywhere near a priority for you means you’re not a real fan…….that’s just dumb. This is a 100 percent subjective thing, and anyone who thinks that, to me, is very limited from an emotional quotient. This is emotion when it comes to a brand.”

Bingo.

Chris Russell also hosts a show on The Team 980 after Sheehan and thinks another name change is “way too much.”

“It wasn’t a favorite of mine, but where I draw the line and divorce myself from many, including my friend Kevin Sheehan, is a fourth name, and identity and brand change in less than four years is way too much,” Russell said. That’s the problem I have. It’s not that I love the name Commanders, I have no feeling for it, and it means nothing to me because I don’t associate my fandom based on a name. It was a poorly and hastily executed decision and wasn’t great, but that doesn’t mean I’m willing to change again to another new name that will be divisive to some. I’m not even willing to consider it.”

Before Russell said this, he sided with Sheehan with the following comments:

“I totally understand those fans of this franchise who did not want to change the name from Redskins when Dan Snyder was forced to cave in,” Russell said. “I blame him for not having a better plan, but I do not blame him, like many of you, because he didn’t do it voluntarily. My argument, and where I think Kevin and I are on the same page I think, is that I would’ve never changed the name. In a perfect world, even though some were offended by it and it is a dictionary-defined slur, I’d have never changed the name, because it meant something completely different than what people were trying to twist it as.”

That’s a lot to unpack, but let’s circle back to Sheehan’s original thoughts. No one, especially if you’re not a fan of the franchise, has the right to criticize longtime fans for not liking the new name. It is 100% subjective. What’s important to one isn’t important to all.

How much damage did the name change do to Washington’s fan base? At this point, it is hard to tell. Once Snyder is officially removed and Harris takes over, we’ll have a better grasp of that answer. However, it will take years, likely sustained success — something that has avoided this franchise since before Snyder bought the team in 1999 — to determine how much of the franchise’s fan base returns. We do know, and so do the Commanders and Harris, that a new owner will be good for business.

So while some fans will continue to criticize another segment of fans for not liking the name, remember, it is their right. This franchise hasn’t given fans a lot to cheer for over the years, but those remaining are a passionate bunch. If you don’t like the name “Commanders” but are still watching the games, commenting on Twitter, etc., you are likely still a fan. The team still creates an emotional response, win or lose.

In closing, should Josh Harris and his group consider another re-branding? The truth is, everything should be on the table. And while you will never make the entire fan base happy [remember the RedWolves], you at least owe it to the fans to listen. Many fans feel like a bunch of outsiders arrived at the current moniker with no real attachment to the city, the region, the franchise’s history, etc. The franchise’s history is important to fans — young and old. And no one is wrong either way.

But Sheehan is right, one side doesn’t have a right to tell the other side how to feel. Regardless of where you stand on this topic, it isn’t likely to go away anytime soon, and fans will eagerly await the new ownership’s comments on the topic once the sale is official.

Aggies linebacker depth on the upside following spring game performance and key transfer addition

Following a promising spring game performance, the Aggies’ linebacker unit is beginning to flash its depth thanks to a key transfer portal addition.

Questions surrounded Texas A&M’s linebacker unit heading into their spring program, but after a promising performance in the Aggies’ exhibition game, alongside a big addition via the transfer portal, this position has a nice mix of talent to make an impact both now and into the future.

Heading into the Maroon and White spring game, Chris Russell Jr. and Edgerrin Cooper were handed the starting reigns for this unit and that same belief hasn’t changed. Both of these two bring much-needed experience to a position that was lacking depth through spring.

Russell is solid as the Mike linebacker, but he’s arguably better suited when playing on the move and blitzing the opposing quarterback. Cooper has excellent closing speed and can make plays in the open field. However, at 6-3 and 230 lbs, he’s not particularly imposing when it comes to his size, which means he could struggle when taking on bigger blockers.

Enter the true x-factor with the addition of Jurriente Davis, who was ranked as the No. 1 transfer portal LB out of Jackson State. While the Aggies have some very capable starters and promising youth for the future, this unit needed a splash via the transfer portal and they got one with Davis.

As we’ve covered here at Aggies Wire, Davis’s tape shows a player that thrives as an off-the-ball linebacker, primarily at the Will position in the Aggies’ 4-2-5 defensive scheme. He’s equipped to tackle what’s in front of him and provide a solid pass rush when needed thanks to his speed and downhill quickness.

Making the jump from FCS to FBS competition is a significant one, make no mistake about it, so the transition will be key to observe for Davis. I don’t think it’ll be a case of “baptism by fire” as Davis’ talent and experience should make the adjustment a smooth one.

While the trio of Russell, Cooper, and Davis shows promise for the Maroon and White in the near term, the Aggies also have a handful of bright prospects that should develop nicely in the future. Second-year Martrell Harris flashed his closing speed in the spring game, while first-year Daymion Sanford is a converted pass rusher who has length and can run.

Freshman Taurean York is a little undersized when it comes to mass (217 lbs for now), but he should easily bulk up in due time. Additionally, he has a nice grasp of the defense and he’s proven useful in coverage as one of the bright spots called out by the coaching staff during spring practice.

With still a few days left in the transfer portal it remains to be seen whether any more additions will be made to this unit. If not, then the Aggies have a promising group headlined by veterans that should make an impact this season, followed by some promising talent for the future.

Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes, and opinions. Follow Pete on Twitter: @PeteThreee

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=5]

[mm-video type=playlist id=01fvdd4pnb49trk727 player_id=01f5k5y2jb3twsvdg4 image=]

Commanders’ Chase Young was the talk of DMV radio

Chase Young’s fifth-year option and future in Washington continue to be a hot topic.

Similarly to when he was drafted, Commanders defensive end Chase Young has been at the center of Washington NFL fan’s radio discussions this week.

Monday and Tuesday, Young was discussed by Chris Russell, Kevin Sheehan, Ben Standig and Grant and Danny.

The heart of the matter in all conversations is that Young has far from lived up to expectations when he was drafted second overall in the 2020 NFL draft. Consequently, with the deadline approaching, the Commanders must decide if they are going to go ahead and take on Chase Young’s fifth-year option.

Sheehan asked Standig if the Commanders had to choose to either extend Montez Sweat or offer Chase Young the fifth-year option, which would they choose. Standig went with Montez Sweat. “Montez Sweat has simply been the better player to this point,” expressed Standig. Standig also pointed to the struggle Ron Rivera has also experienced with Young’s maturity as a major issue.

“Defensive end/pass rusher is a significant priority for this team because Chase Young is not a part of the long-term future of this team in my eyes,” declared Russell on his 980 The Team show. “And I don’t think he is in their eyes either.”

Russell told his listeners, “There’s stuff you all don’t know about, that they (the Commanders) know about. I keep telling you that. There’s stuff you don’t know about that they know about. And I am just going to leave it at that.”

Grant Paulsen expressed regarding Young that after a fine rookie season, “Going into year two, we all expected he was about to make the Bosa leap. He was about to go get 14/15 sacks. Obviously, for nine games, he was really disappointing before he got hurt.”

“That whole season started with Young, the only one of the 90 players of the entire team who wasn’t at OTAs. Then when he was asked about it he was ‘getting that money, boss’. So, some of the questions started to come right away.

“Rivera was challenging him, talking about his maturity. So it has been very negative and downhill since then, I would say.”

All were in agreement, they want Young to bust out and play well for Washington, but they were all realistic as well. Young has been a major disappointment, and it is not about his injury only. Young was entirely unaware of how immature he was during the 2021 season.

We are all hoping he has grown up, is now aware and mature, and ready to bust out as a second-overall pick in an NFL draft should be.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbykgy681k112p8 player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=]

Washington at New York Giants meaningless?

Is Washington’s game against the Giants a meaningless one?

This Week 18 match of Washington at the New York Giants could very easily be the lowest-rated game this weekend. Both teams have disappointed this season, and both teams have turned up the disappointment in this last month.

The Giants look like they began mailing it in a few weeks ago, don’t they? Their last five games the Giants have lost by double digits each time (Miami 20-9, LA Chargers 37-21, Dallas 21-6, Philadelphia 34-10, Chicago 29-3).

Washington was 6-6, riding a four-game winning streak, and actually in the No. 6 NFC playoff spot with five divisional games to play. Washington now has lost the first four of those games (Dallas 27-20, Philadelphia 27-17, Dallas 56-14, Philadelphia 20-16).

I asked a couple of Washington Sports Personalities and friends (Chris Russell and Rick Snider) what they thought of the game, and they were both kind enough to respond, providing their predictions.

Chris Russell currently hosts “Russell and Medhurst” (Pete Medhurst) Monday through Friday at 3-7 PM on The Team 980 AM. Chris invited me to join his team of writers at Sports Illustrated when he was the publisher of the Washington Football Team page. I caused him a lot of grief with my penchant for being long-winded and wanting to talk Washington football history. But he remains a friend today.

Chris: “Both teams’ offenses are wretched but Washington’s is a touch better and healthier. The faster this is over the better.” Washington 13-10.

Writing regularly about Washington NFL football since 1993, Rick Snider is a columnist for 106.7 The Fan and Warpath. He provides informative 2-minute videos on his Youtube channel, and was our senior writer for the  Sports Illustrated Washington Football page managed by Chris Russell.

Rick: “Whomever gets the early lead wins meaningless season finales and Washington has seldom led early all season.” NY Giants 20-17.