Notre Dame Football: 2020 Recruiting Class Not Complete After All?

As a result, Martinez, who was recruited by Ohio State as a defensive back, is yet to put his commitment in paper.

A week before Christmas, Notre Dame signed 18 high school seniors on the early National Signing Day and Ohio State transfer, safety Isaiah Pryor.

Shortly after they added Northwestern transfer, wide receiver Bennett Skowronek to help fill the enormous hole left with Chase Claypool’s departure.

The 20 new additions to the Fighting Irish appeared to be it for the 2020 recruiting class but the deeper we get into January, the more we see that possibly not being the case.

Cameron Martinez, a 5-11, 183 pound athlete from Muskegon, Michigan had committed to Ohio State on the Fourth of July.

Funny this is however, the early signing period came and went without Martinez signing with Ryan Day’s Ohio State Buckeyes.

So enter Notre Dame.

What appears to have happened is Ohio State’s defensive backs coach Jeff Hafley took the head coaching job at Boston College. As a result, Martinez, who was recruited by Ohio State as a defensive back, is yet to put his commitment in paper.

So Notre Dame has jumped back in and we assume they’re not the only ones again interested.

Martinez, who starred at quarterback in high school and was an incredible playmaker. So much in fact he was named Michigan’s Gatorade Player of the Year this past fall and he may want to play offense in college instead of defense where it sounds like most coaches have guided him towards.

Like Ohio State, Notre Dame is currently operating without a certain secondary coach as Todd Lyght has stepped down since the season’s conclusion.

Because of that I’m not letting myself get too excited about a potential extra member in this class, but it’s certainly something to keep an eye on.

It may be easy to request Brian Kelly and his staff to offer Martinez to come play offense, but that’d be also ignoring the holes that remain at the corner position.

For what it’s worth I’m still not at a place where I expect Martinez to flip from Ohio State but it’s refreshing to hear Notre Dame still being linked to him and the 2020 class possibly still being able to grow by one.

Wisconsin cuts against the Big Ten – in a good way

Wisconsin beats Penn State

In a thoroughly weird college basketball season — a season so odd that Ohio State is 1-4 in the Big Ten without having played Michigan or Michigan State — Wisconsin has been part of the weirdness. Yet, the Badgers have contributed to this bizarre season in ways which aren’t entirely bad.

The 5-5 start was bad, but in January, the Badgers have been a mostly pleasant surprise in the Big Ten. How surprising? Get this: Imagine being told on Christmas Day that Wisconsin — the same team which couldn’t tie its shoelaces away from the Kohl Center in November and early December — would enter its January 14 (Tuesday) game against Maryland as the Big Ten team with the most total road wins (3). Imagine being told that this Wisconsin team which was a total mess away from Madison in the first month of the season would enter January 14 as the Big Ten leader in conference road wins (2).

Wisconsin can’t let home games against other Big Ten bubble teams such as Illinois slip away. UW badly needs that win on Tuesday against Maryland. However, we can focus more on that game when it arrives in a few days. For now, simply appreciate the enormity of the turnaround Wisconsin has made on the road. Ohio State is struggling, and to be brutally honest about it, Penn State is struggling as well. Yet, Wisconsin was hardly a clear favorite heading into Columbus on Jan. 3. It was hardly a clear favorite heading into State College on Saturday, Jan. 11. Yet, it won both games, and it did so despite scoring an average of just under 60 points per game — 61 against Ohio State, 58 on Saturday versus Penn State.

There are still two months left in the season — two months for the Badgers to develop on offense and find a more blended, consistent attack. Two months isn’t an eternity, but two months do give UW some time and space in which to grow. Maybe by early March, this offense will purr with efficiency and precision. However, in the short run — certainly in the next few weeks — Wisconsin will need to remain the team it became against Ohio State and Penn State: a defensive terror which causes opponents to hesitate and punishes skilled players if they don’t work hard without the ball.

That was the defining aspect of this win over Penn State: The Nittany Lions were asking for the ball on passes from teammates instead of actually working to get open. Penn State expected it could create shots with one-on-one play instead of using harmonious, five-as-one offense to create good scoring chances with ball movement and player movement. The ball stuck for Penn State, and Wisconsin showed no mercy, holding PSU under 50 points.

We have said it for the past several weeks: Wisconsin has to play and win street fights, because its offense is not a very developed one. That developmental process might require the whole season. The Badgers certainly aren’t close to where they need to be on offense. The defense has to carry them.

What’s good: Wisconsin can play like this on the road. Now, let’s see if the Badgers can defend like that at home.

Did we say this was a weird season?

Texas Tech at West Virginia odds, picks and best bets

Analyzing Saturday’s Texas Tech Red Raiders at West Virginia Mountaineers betting odds and lines, with NCAA basketball betting picks.

The Texas Tech Red Raiders (10-4) visit the West Virginia Mountaineers (12-2) at WVU Coliseum for a 6 p.m. ET tip-off Saturday. We analyze the Texas Tech-West Virginia odds and betting lines, with college basketball betting advice and tips around this matchup.

Texas Tech at West Virginia: Three things you need to know

1. West Virginia does a great job controlling the glass. The Mountaineers get the sixth-most rebounds per game in the country.

2. Texas Tech moves the ball well, The Red Raiders are ranked ninth in assists per game and 18th in assist/turnover ratio.

3. West Virginia has covered the spread in five of the last six Texas Tech-West Virginia games.


Get some action on this college basketball matchup or others by placing a legal sports bet at BetMGM! New customer offer: Risk-free first bet! Visit BetMGM for terms and conditions.


Texas Tech at West Virginia: Odds, betting lines and picks

Odds via BetMGM; access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated at 2 p.m. ET.

Prediction

West Virginia 62, Texas Tech 55

Moneyline (ML)

The Mountaineers return home after a four-game road trip in which they won three out of four games, including an upset of No. 2 Ohio State but a loss to No. 3 Kansas. Texas Tech had its five-game win streak snapped when it lost to No. 4 Baylor. It heads to Morgantown for just its second true road game of the year.

Let’s PASS on the moneyline play here because of West Virginia’s sizable home-court advantage—the Mountaineers are 60-14 outright since 2015 and are 8-0 so far this season at home—and the poor value of the West Virginia (-209) moneyline price.

New to sports betting? A $10 bet West Virginia to win outright would return a profit of $4.80.

Against the Spread (ATS)

HAMMER WEST VIRGINIA (-4.5, -110) because the ATS trends favor the Mountaineers. West Virginia has covered five of the last six games against Texas Tech. Since 2015, the Mountaineers are 46-39-1 ATS versus conference opponents, 24-19-1 ATS against ranked opponents and 33-27-1 ATS at home. Furthermore, Texas Tech is just 6-8 ATS on the season, including a 65-60 overtime loss at DePaul making them 0-1 outright and ATS on the road.

Over/Under (O/U)

Since we are on West Virginia to win by at least 5 points, meaning that they should control the tempo and pace, we should also take the UNDER 131.5 (-110). I like betting Over/Under handicaps correlated to the spread bet and West Virginia is an elite defensive team. The Mountaineers rank third in the country in opponent field goal percentage and 19th in opponent points per game. Their Over/Under record is 3-11 for the season and an Under bet has cashed in four of the last five Texas Tech-West Virginia games.

Want some action on this matchup? Place a bet at BetMGM now. For more sports betting picks and tips, visit SportsbookWire.com.

Follow @Geoffery_Clark and @SportsbookWire on Twitter.

Gannett may earn revenue from audience referrals to betting services.  Newsrooms are independent of this relationship and there is no influence on news coverage.

[lawrence-newsletter]

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=11866]

Ohio State at Indiana odds, picks and best bets

Previewing Saturday’s Ohio State Buckeyes vs. Indiana Hoosiers sports betting odds and lines, with college basketball betting picks and tips.

The Ohio State Buckeyes (11-4, 1-3 Big Ten) visit the Indiana Hoosiers (12-3, 2-2) Saturday at Assembly Hall for a 12 p.m. ET tip-off. We analyze the Ohio State-Indiana odds and betting lines, with college basketball betting advice and tips around this matchup.

The Buckeyes are ranked 12th in the USA TODAY Sports men’s basketball coaches poll, but have lost three games in a row.

Ohio State at Indiana: Three things you need to know

1. The Buckeyes have lost their last three, most recently 67-55 to No. 14 Maryland as a 2.5-point underdog Tuesday. Junior F Kaleb Wesson leads OSU in scoring (14.7 PPG), rebounds (9.3 RPG) and blocks (1.3 BPG).

2. The Hoosiers snapped a two-game skid, but didn’t look good doing it in a 66-62 home win vs. last-place Northwestern Wednesday. Freshman F Trayce Jackson-Davis leads IU in scoring (15.2 PPG), rebounds (8.3 RPG) and blocks (2.1 BPG).

3. The Buckeyes have won the last four in the series, covering the spread in all but an 80-78 overtime win in Bloomington as a 2.5-point favorite. In their last meeting, Ohio State eliminated Indiana in the Big Ten Tournament with a 79-75 second-round victory – it was each team’s first game in the tourney as they received byes.


Get some action on this game or others by placing a bet at BetMGM!


Ohio State at Indiana: Odds, betting lines and picks

Odds via BetMGM; access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated at 8:45 a.m. ET.

Prediction

Indiana 72, Ohio State 67

Moneyline (ML)

There’s no moneyline posted as of this publishing, which is fine since the line is so small.

Against the Spread (ATS)

INDIANA (+1.5, +100) is the STRONGEST PLAY. Despite the Hoosiers not playing well lately, and the Buckeyes really needing a win, homecourts rule in the Big Ten. IU is 10-1 at home; OSU is 1-2 on the road. Look for Indiana to feed off the Assembly Hall crowd, which rumor has it will include former coach Bob Knight.

New to sports betting? This bet will pay you even money at +100. Every $1 wagered on the Hoosiers will profit $1 if they win outright or lose by just a single point.

Over/Under (O/U)

OVER 135.5 (-106) is worth a small play. The Hoosiers average 76.9 points per game, while the Buckeyes score at a 74.7-PPG pace. Look for Indiana to score from the foul line, along with improving on its 3-point shooting – IU ranks near the bottom of the country at 30.2%. Someone will need to step up, especially if “The General” is in the house.

Want some action in this one? Place a bet at BetMGM now. For more sports betting picks and tips, visit SportsbookWire.com.

Johnny’s record since Dec. 1: 30-14-1. Strongest plays: 16-4.

Follow @JohnnyParlay11 and @SportsbookWire on Twitter.

Gannett may earn revenue from audience referrals to betting services.  Newsrooms are independent of this relationship and there is no influence on news coverage.

[lawrence-newsletter]

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=11866]

Notre Dame Hockey: Irish Shut Out by Wolverines

No. 14 Notre Dame suffered a surprising 3-0 defeat to Michigan on Friday despite allowing only 18 shots on goal. The Irish (10-8-3, 5-4-2-1) were unable to solve Strauss Mann, who stopped all 32 shots he faced, requiring the Wolverines (8-11-2, …

No. 14 Notre Dame suffered a surprising 3-0 defeat to Michigan on Friday despite allowing only 18 shots on goal. The Irish (10-8-3, 5-4-2-1) were unable to solve Strauss Mann, who stopped all 32 shots he faced, requiring the Wolverines (8-11-2, 3-7-1-0) to score only one goal for the win. That came when Nick Pastujov scored 18 seconds into a first-period power play. Nick Granowicz scored early in the third period, and Jacob Hayhurst added an empty-netter much later.

Notre Dame had three chances on the power play over the first and second periods but were unable to capitalize. Cale Morris, the reigning Big Ten First Star of the Week, made 15 out of a possible 17 saves.

The Irish’s best chances to score came on a wide-open attempt in the slot from Mike O’Leary and a net-front backhander from Cal Burke. However, Mann was able to prevent those and all other Notre Dame opportunities.

This two-game conference series in South Bend will conclude Sunday.

Wisconsin bubble watch: the huge Big Ten bubble of 2020

A look at the bubble

The Wisconsin Badgers were steadily moving in the right direction before Wednesday night’s game against the Illinois Fighting Illini. Four straight wins, two of them on the road, one against a likely NCAA Tournament team (Ohio State), all solidified Wisconsin’s resume. However, the Badgers needed to continue to stack wins together. More precisely, they needed to continue to win against NCAA Tournament teams. Milwaukee (Dec. 21) and Rider (Dec. 31) won’t move the needle in terms of bubble placement.

After losing 71-70 to Illinois at home, the Badgers are very much a bubble team, if there was doubt about their status before tip-off. The Badgers have some decent wins which should look good in two months, but they don’t have any conversation-ending, debate-settling wins in a fragile college basketball ecosystem which is still very hard to define.

As you consider the bubble landscape, just how worried should you be? With two months until Selection Sunday, it is too early to make very specific and targeted comparisons between Team A here and Team B over there. We can’t really say that certain teams are battling for at-large bids. That discussion comes into focus in the middle of February. What CAN be said, however, about the bubble right now is that it is extremely large in the Big Ten. Consider what Chris Dobbertean of SB Nation’s Blogging the Bracket had to say about Illinois’ win over Wisconsin:

Chris is not predicting that 12 Big Ten teams will get into the field of 68. He is, however, noting that a lot of Big Ten teams (everyone but Northwestern and Nebraska) has a real chance to get in. There are a lot of resumes with a “kinda sorta maybe” quality to them: obviously worthy of being considered, but just as clearly not good enough to feel secure about the NCAA Tournament. The coming weeks will likely bump a few Big Ten teams into the NIT, but with so many teams winning at home and losing on the road, the Big Ten is very bunched in the middle, with the two NU schools at the bottom and Michigan State at the top. If teams continue to trade wins and losses, the Big Ten bubble will remain very large.

That is one point to keep in mind.

Here is the other one: What happens in one conference has to be measured against other conferences when assessing bubble odds and prospects. The ACC is not very good this season. North Carolina isn’t even a bubble team… unless you are talking about the NIT. UNC might have to play in the CBI this season. Syracuse is in a similar spot.

If you look at the ACC right now, only four teams — Duke, Florida State, Louisville, and Virginia — are in good shape for an NCAA bid. Three other teams — Virginia Tech, North Carolina State, and Pittsburgh — are in bubble territory. This is no joke: The ACC might get only five bids this season. If the ACC gets only five, and the SEC (which has struggled) gets only four bids, and the Pac-12 gets only three, other conferences will have many bids to grab. Enter the Big Ten.

Wisconsin is competing with other Big Ten teams for an at-large bid, but it is also competing with Pittsburgh and USC and bubble teams in other conferences. The Big Ten bubble is an inconvenience — more bubble competition inside the league — but it is also a sign that the teams Wisconsin will play in the coming weeks are decent teams. This means the more Wisconsin can win in this conference (against teams other than Nebraska and Northwestern), the more its resume should improve.

This is what one has to keep in mind about the huge Big Ten bubble of 2020.

Purdue at Michigan college basketball odds, picks and best bets

Previewing Thursday’s Purdue Boilermakers at Michigan Wolverines sports betting odds and lines, with college basketball betting picks.

The Purdue Boilermakers (9-6, 2-2 Big Ten) and Michigan Wolverines (10-4, 1-2 Big Ten) tip it off at Crisler Center in Ann Arbor at 7 p.m. ET Thursday. We analyze the Purdue-Michigan odds and betting lines, while providing college basketball betting tips and advice on this matchup.

The Wolverines are ranked 19th in the USA TODAY Sports men’s basketball coaches poll.

Purdue at Michigan: Three things you need to know

1. Like their rivals to the south in Ohio, the Wolverines are stumbling lately. They’re just 2-3 straight up and against the spread, including an ugly 87-69 smack in the mouth in East Lansing last time out on Jan. 5.

2. Purdue hasn’t exactly been lighting the world afire, either, as they are just 3-3 SU/2-4 ATS across the past six, and they managed just 37 total points in a 26-point loss at Illinois on Jan. 5.

3. The Wolverines rank 18th in the nation in field-goal percentage at 48.3, and they’re a respectable 37.5 percent from behind the 3-point arc, checking in 35th.


Get some action on this game or others by placing a bet at BetMGM!


Purdue at Michigan: Odds, betting lines and picks

Odds via BetMGM; access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated at 9:30 a.m. ET.

Prediction

Michigan 71, Purdue 62

Moneyline (ML)

Avoid the chalk on the Wolverines (-250) and play the spread instead in search of a great profit margin.

Against the Spread (ATS)

MICHIGAN (-5.5, -110) has burned me before, including its loss at Illinois earlier in the season when I was positive they’d roll the Illini. That was actually the start of their skid. They’re hosting a very marginal Purdue (+5.5, -110) side at home, and I fully expect Jon Teske, Zavier Simpson and company to come out on fire.

Over/Under (O/U)

OVER 128.5 (-110) seems super low considering Michigan throws down 78.3 points per game on average. It’s mainly because Purdue’s offense is awful, as the Boilermakers average just 68.2 PPG to rank 260th in the country. Defensively, they slow it down like Virginia, allowing 59.1 PPG to rank 12th in the nation. Still, I expect Michigan’s offense to make it happen and push it over the line.

Want some action in this one? Place a bet at BetMGM now. For more sports betting picks and tips, visit SportsbookWire.com.

Follow @JoeWilliamsVI and @SportsbookWire on Twitter.

Gannett may earn revenue from audience referrals to betting services.  Newsrooms are independent of this relationship and there is no influence on news coverage.

[lawrence-newsletter]

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=11866]

Notre Dame Hockey: Wolverine Weekend

No. 14 Notre Dame (10-7-3, 5-3-2-1) will get back to Big Ten action when it plays Michigan (7-11-2, 2-7-1-0) on Friday and Saturday. The first contest will be the Irish’s first time playing an unranked opponent in eight games, and it will come at a …

No. 14 Notre Dame (10-7-3, 5-3-2-1) will get back to Big Ten action when it plays Michigan (7-11-2, 2-7-1-0) on Friday and Saturday. The first contest will be the Irish’s first time playing an unranked opponent in eight games, and it will come at a time when Alex Steeves and Michael Graham are on five-game point streaks, each totaling seven in that span. It also comes as Cale Morris has stopped 119 of his past 121 shots faced and is the reigning Big Ten First Star of the Week.

Notre Dame players who have had the most success against Michigan in their careers are Matt Hellickson (eight points) and Cal Burke (five points). They have been a key part of some of the Irish’s more recent success against the Wolverines as they have won 10 of the 15 meetings since their final season in the CCHA (2012-13). The teams split four meetings last year, and will meet four times again this season.

 

Notre Dame Hockey: Morris is Week’s First Star

Cale Morris’ stellar play in Notre Dame’s two games against Western Michigan (one win and one tie) earned him Big Ten First Star of the Week honors. The senior goaltender and alternate captain made 42 and 40 saves, respectively, in the Irish’s …

Cale Morris’ stellar play in Notre Dame’s two games against Western Michigan (one win and one tie) earned him Big Ten First Star of the Week honors. The senior goaltender and alternate captain made 42 and 40 saves, respectively, in the Irish’s matchups with the Broncos.

Minnesota goaltender Jack LaFontaine was the conference’s Second Star of the Week, and Ohio State forward Tanner Laczynski was named the Third Star.

This is the third time this season Morris has been named a Big Ten Star of the Week and second time he’s been named the First Star. Other Notre Dame players who have been part of the conference’s weekly honor this season are Mike O’Leary, Cal Burke, Matt Hellickson and Cam Morrison.

Morris has been the First Star of the Week eight times in his career and the Second and Third Star of the Week three times apiece.

Morris and the Irish, ranked 14th in the latest poll, return to the ice Friday and Saturday against Michigan.

Illinois is part of two cycles in Big Ten basketball

More on Illinois basketball within the context of the Big Ten

I hasten to offer a clarifying statement at the start of this piece, so that no one gets the wrong idea: There are more than two cycles at work in present-day Big Ten basketball. I am not limiting the amount of cycles to only two. More can be found and remarked on.

Today — here and now — I am focusing on two cycles, and Illinois basketball is part of them. This line of thought offers perspective on the Fighting Illini before Wednesday’s game against the Wisconsin Badgers. It also sheds light on what has been happening in Big Ten basketball in recent years.

Let’s start with the more immediate cycle at work in the Big Ten: the simple reality that downtrodden teams are having a happy moment this season. Illinois was 12-21 last season, but the Illini have begun to make substantial improvements and take concrete forward steps as a program this year. A team which was 4-11 after 15 games at this point in January of 2019 is 10-5 in January of 2020. Illinois has lost to Michigan State, Maryland and Arizona on the road, all expected losses. The Illini would like to have back at least one of two losses — Miami at home, Missouri in St. Louis — but if Illinois is basically one game short of an ideal situation, the program is fundamentally on schedule this season.

Illinois — should it continue its upward trajectory — is poised to make the NCAA Tournament and join both Rutgers and Penn State in the Big Dance. This is one of the central stories of the Big Ten in early 2020: Several teams in the conference are picking themselves off the canvas and creating fresh excitement among their fan bases. It is the year of revival in the conference. If we go back a few years, we can see that other programs — most notably Northwestern — have enjoyed breakthrough seasons after struggling. Even Nebraska made an NCAA Tournament not THAT long ago (in 2014). If a Big Ten basketball program seems to have no hope, wait a few years. Illinois is part of that parade. The Illini have a lot of work to do to make the NCAAs, but they are on the right track. After the first two seasons of Brad Underwood’s tenure in Champaign, that was hardly a sure thing.

Here is the larger cycle Illinois is part of, however: The Illini might be on their way to the NCAA Tournament this season. Let’s say that does indeed happen. Would there be any assurance the Illini could make the music last? This is the uncertainty which looms over most Big Ten programs. I would say that five conference programs — Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Purdue, Ohio State — can currently and reasonably expect to be very good nearly every year with few interruptions. The other nine cannot, or at least, have not yet proven they can.

Wisconsin basketball fans are especially happy — rightly so, I might add — that Minnesota basketball simply hasn’t been able to gain much traction this century. The Golden Gophers have made the NCAA Tournament in back-to-back seasons only once this century, in 2009 and 2010. Minnesota just doesn’t build or gather momentum as a program… and that dynamic applies to the other eight schools in the conference: Iowa, Northwestern, Nebraska, Indiana, Maryland, Rutgers, Penn State, and — of course — Illinois. Name the last time any of those programs hit or came close to hitting their ceiling of potential in back-to-back seasons. Maybe Maryland in recent years, but I would say that Maryland has not maximized its potential in any individual season since joining the Big Ten. The Terrapins have gotten solid NCAA Tournament seeds in the 4 to 6 range, but those teams had 2-seed potential and didn’t come especially close to realizing it.

Cycle No. 1: You can pick yourself up in the Big Ten even if the previous few seasons have been bad.

Cycle No. 2: If you have a good season in the Big Ten — and you’re not a Michigan school, Wisconsin, Purdue, or Ohio State — that good season is typically surrounded by subpar seasons.

These are the two Big Ten basketball cycles Illinois is currently a part of. We will see if the Illini or any of other eight members of the conference’s underclass can break free of these chains in the 2020s.