Andrew Greif: “Left knee injury …
Rick Bonnell: It doesn’t sound likely …
Salman Ali: Clint Capela is out …
Super 25 Regional High School Boys Basketball Rankings: Preseason
Take a look at the top Super 25 Boys Basketball teams in each region as the season approaches.
[jwplayer u9vbsjb4-BmKM743H]
USA TODAY High School Sports will make Super 25 Regional Rankings for boys basketball this season as selected by the USA TODAY High School Sports staff with weekly rankings in five regions — Northeast, Midwest, South, Frontier and Pacific. These are the preseason boys basketball rankings for the 2019-20 season.
TOP 25: Super 25 Preseason Boys Rankings
ALL-USA PRESEASON: Boys Team | Girls Team
*Records are from last season
NORTHEAST
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Maine, New Jersey, New York, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont.
- The Patrick School, Hillside, New Jersey (13-12)
- Long Island Lutheran, Glen Head, New York (23-2)
- DeMatha Catholic, Hyattsville, Maryland (33-5)
- Roman Catholic, Philadelphia (24-5)
- Roselle Catholic, Roselle, New Jersey (28-4)
- Archbishop Stepinac, White Plains, New York (14-16)
- Gonzaga, Washington, District of Columbia (28-9)
- Camden, New Jersey (17-10)
- Westtown, West Chester, Pennsylvania (22-6)
- Baltimore Polytechnic, Towson, Maryland (22-5)
SOUTH
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia.
- Montverde Academy, Florida (22-3)
- IMG Academy, Bradenton, Florida (31-1)
- McEachern, Powder Springs, Georgia (32-0)
- Oak Hill Academy, Mouth of Wilson, Virginia (33-5)
- Paul VI, Fairfax, Virginia (27-9)
- Greensboro Day, North Carolina (30-5)
- Briarcrest Christian, Eads, Tennessee (26-2)
- Grayson, Loganville, Georgia (25-4)
- Hamilton Heights Christian Academy, Chattanooga, Tennessee (34-4)
- Millbrook, Raleigh, North Carolina (27-2)
MIDWEST
Iowa, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, West Virginia, Wisconsin.
- Huntington Prep, West Virginia (21-4)
- Morgan Park, Chicago (28-5)
- Minnehaha Academy, Minneapolis (23-2)
- Archbishop Moeller, Cincinnati (29-0)
- Whitney Young, Chicago (25-8)
- Lincoln, Ypsilanti, Michigan (23-4)
- Teays Valley Christian Prep, West Virginia (27-5)
- Lawrence Central, Indiana (22-4)
- Hamilton, Sussex, Wisconsin (21-5)
- La Lumiere, La Porte, Indiana (30-1)
FRONTIER
Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Wyoming.
- Wasatch Academy, Mount Pleasant, Utah (26-4)
- Duncanville, Texas (32-7)
- Sunrise Christian, Bel Aire, Kansas (10-16)
- Morton Ranch, Katy, Texas (28-7)
- Booker T. Washington, Tulsa, Okla. (22-2)
- Jacksonville, Arkansas (15-10)
- Mansfield Timberview, Arlington, Texas (38-2)
- Smoky Hill, Aurora, Colo. (20-6)
- Bishop Miege, Shawnee Mission, Kan. (19-3)
- Dickinson, Texas (21-9)
PACIFIC
Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Washington.
- Hillcrest Prep, Phoenix, Arizona (35-5)
- Prolific Prep, Napa, California (30-6)
- Sierra Canyon, Chatsworth, California (32-3)
- Mayfair, Lakewood, California (26-7)
- Mater Dei, Santa Ana, California (29-5)
- Bishop Gorman, Las Vegas, Nevada (28-5)
- Rancho Christian, Temecula, California (26-6)
- Dream City, Glendale, Arizona (N/A)
- Salesian College Prep, Richmond, California (31-1)
- O’Dea, Seattle, Washington (19-8)
Texas-Iowa State odds: Longhorns underdogs in Ames
Previewing Saturday’s Texas at Iowa State college football matchup, with college football betting odds, picks and best bets
[jwplayer 64hUO9C8]
The Texas Longhorns (6-3, 4-2 Big 12) and Iowa State Cyclones (5-4, 3-3) hook up at Jack Trice Stadium in Ames, Iowa, at 3:30 p.m. ET Saturday, and though Texas is ranked NO. 19, Iowa State is favored by nearly a touchdown.
We analyze the Texas-Iowa State odds and betting lines, while providing college football betting tips and advice on this matchup.
Texas at Iowa State: Three things you need to know
1. Texas has a marginal record, but it’s no fault of the offense. The Longhorns are 20th in the country in total yards (476.7), 16th in passing yards (303.7) and 14th in points scored (37.8). Defensively, however, Texas is 109th in total yards allowed (447.6) and 124th in passing yards allowed (299.6).
2. Iowa State can match Texas offensively, as ranking 16th in total yards (479.2), eighth in passing yards (323.2) and tied for 19th in points scored (36.4). It is on defense where the Cyclones separate from the Longhorns, ranking 32nd in rushing yards allowed (128.4) and 43rd in total yards allowed (359.8).
3. The home team is 5-2 against the spread in the past seven meetings in this series, and the under is 4-0 in the past four battles.
Get some action on this game or others by placing a bet at BetMGM!
Texas at Iowa State: Odds, betting lines and picks
Odds via BetMGM; access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated Thursday at 2:20 p.m. ET.
Prediction
Iowa State 41, Texas 38
Moneyline (ML)
Iowa State (-257) is too steep at this price, although the Cyclones should be able to pull it out at home. Still, while they’re nearly a touchdown favorite, this one really could go either way.
New to sports betting? A $10 wager on Iowa State to win would return a profit of $3.90.
Against the Spread (ATS)
TEXAS (+6.5, -106) is ranked in the Top 20 for a reason. Between QB Sam Ehlinger and WR Devin Duvernay, this offense can roll up a lot of points and hang with anyone. Iowa State (-6.5, -115) also sports a high-powered offense, led by QB Brock Purdy. Remember, though, the Longhorns are 14-2 straight up in this series, and 6-1 in their seven trips to I-State.
Over/Under (O/U)
The OVER (65.5, -115) is the play, although you’ll be betting against all of the trends. The under is 38-16 in the past 54 for Texas against winning teams, while going 46-20 in the past 66 Big 12 battles. The under is also 19-9-2 in the past 30 for Iowa State and 7-2-1 in the past 10 against winning teams. However, both of these offenses are explosive, and the Longhorns defense is very giving.
Get some action on this game or others, place a bet with BetMGM today. And for more sports betting picks and tips, visit SportsbookWire.com.
Follow @JoeWilliamsVI and @SportsbookWire on Twitter.
Gannett may earn revenue from audience referrals to betting services. Newsrooms are independent of this relationship and there is no influence on news coverage.
[lawrence-newsletter]
[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1623]
Andrew Wiggins is slowly shedding the bust label
Andrew Wiggins is playing the best basketball of his career. We break down his high level of play with stats and video.
In seasons prior, Minnesota Timberwolves swingman Andrew Wiggins commonly found himself near the bottom of lists ranking players in various advanced metrics.
Just last year, Wiggins finished the 2018-19 campaign sitting at 511th in Value Over Replacement Player (VORP), 178th in Box Plus/Minus (BPM) and 340th in Win Shares. What that means – and you can be assured, it’s impossible to spin those marks as anything but terrible – is that Wiggins was getting a lot of minutes and finishing a lot of possessions with the ball in his hands, but was extremely inefficient with his touches.
His raw averages last season – 18.1 points per game on 16.6 field-goal attempts nightly and 41.2/33.9/69.9 shooting splits – indicate the same: Wiggins was a very ineffective player.
But that seems to have changed this season, at least thus far.
The first glimpse we got of this newfound, confident and explosive version of Wiggins came on Oct. 27 when the Canadian forward exploded in the fourth quarter of a tight contest against the now 7-3 Miami Heat, finishing the outing with 25 points (16 of which came in the deciding quarter) on 50 percent shooting from the floor.
Still, though, Wiggins had flashed moments of brilliance before in his career, and they never translated to anything sustainable, so how were we supposed to know this time would be any different?
Well, if the last five games tell us anything, it’s that this time looks to be just that… different.
Over that span, Wiggins is averaging 31.6 points per game, to go with 5.0 rebounds, 6.0 assists (extremely noteworthy for a player with a 2.2-assist career average), 1.2 steals and 1.4 blocks per game (with just 1.6 turnovers, an absurdly low mark considering his usage rate). The advanced stats, those that were so cruel to the 24-year-old in the past, have changed their tune as well, placing Wiggins among the Top 60 players in the Association this season. That’s still not quite elite , but in comparison to his aforementioned marks from 2018-19, Wiggins ranking 42nd in VORP, 59th in BPM and 22nd in Win Shares (!) is pretty impressive.
When asked about Wiggins’ season thus far, Timberwolves assistant coach David Vanterpool told HoopsHype: “He has been incredible at trying to make his teammates better in every facet. He’s doing a great job with his defensive assignments, and he has been great facilitating for others on the offensive end. He’s a natural scorer so even his scoring, when it’s necessary, helps those around him. He’s playing at an All-Star level.”
Vanterpool isn’t lying; Wiggins looks like a different player as a distributor recently. The Canadian forward’s vision is night and day compared to previous years – he’s keeping his head up while driving and finding secondary and even tertiary options when he draws multiple defenders.
According to the NBA’s primary stats page, Wiggins is passing the ball over 35 times per night this season, a significant jump from his 26 nightly passes last season, and proof of a more well-rounded offensive player.
At the same time, Wiggins hasn’t made a leap this year solely because of his improved willingness and vision as a playmaker. He’s gotten much more effective at putting the ball in the bucket, too.
Per Synergy Sports, Wiggins ranks as a “very good” (82nd percentile) scorer in the halfcourt, producing a total of 1.07 points per possession (PPP) in such chances. That’s a better mark than professional bucket-getters like Devin Booker (1.03 PPP out of the halfcourt) and Trae Young (1.01 PPP), for the record. Last year, Wiggins scored a paltry 0.86 PPP out of the halfcourt, which placed him in the Association’s 27th percentile.
Part of the reason for Wiggins making this massive jump in effectiveness as a scorer is the fact that he’s attempting more three-pointers (6.5) than he ever has before at any point in his career. To make up the difference, the Wolves wing is taking way less long two-point jumpers these days, a shot he used to attempt with aplomb despite it’s well-documented inefficiency.
Coming into this season, Wiggins was taking 35.9 percent of his field-goal attempts for his career from between 10 feet away from the basket and the three-point line – over a third of his shots coming from this hellscape of efficient basketball. This year, however, that number is all the way down to 20.4 percent, a much more acceptable rate for a scorer such as Wiggins.
As a result of both the better shot selection and improved passing, the 24-year-old is producing 1.3 PPP in isolation situations (with passes included) this season, a mark healthy enough to rank as “excellent,” per Synergy, and to put him in the league’s 86th percentile, ahead of All-NBA-level talents like reigning league MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo (1.07 PPP) and his own teammate Karl-Anthony Towns (1.0 PPP).
All in all, Wiggins’ development this season can be attributed to (much) better shot selection, improved playmaking chops, less floating in and out of games and more consistent effort on both ends of the floor.
There had never been any sort of dispute in regards to his otherworldly physical tools…
Holy moly Andrew Wiggins spin move. 🌪 pic.twitter.com/Btt0wm92Ls
— Kyle Ratke (@Kyle_Ratke) November 9, 2019
…but now that Wiggins is going all-out, full-throttle during his time on the floor, he’s able to shine much more brightly.
The jury is still out on whether this isn’t just an extended flash of hardwood brilliance or something sustainable, but considering the lack of red flags with his production (like fluky shooting marks, for example), there’s reason to believe this is real.
You can follow Frank Urbina on Twitter: @FrankUrbina_.
Gardner Minshew disappointed with losing starter role but grateful for the experience
Jags quarterback Gardner Minshew II wanted to remain the team’s starter but says he wouldn’t trade the eight starts he got for the role.
After going on a 4-4 run as a starter, Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Gardner Minshew II will resume taking snaps as the team’s No. 2 quarterback this week as Nick Foles was renamed the team’s starter. While the competitor in him was disappointed about being named the backup again, Minshew told the media that he was grateful for his time on the field as he received a grand opportunity to learn a ton about the league.
Gardner Minshew says he was disappointed when told he wasn’t starting anymore but he is pleased about starting half of the season pic.twitter.com/HoJ7QGR7Xz
— John Reid (@JohnReid64) November 13, 2019
“I was disappointed a little bit, obviously, because everybody wants to be that guy in the huddle,” Minshew said Wednesday. “But if you had told me at the beginning of year that I’d get to play half a season and then be able to learn, I’d have said I would take that deal 100 percent. I got a lot of good experience and I’m also going to be able to learn from one of the best dudes in the business.”
Minshew continued by stating that the experience he received made him believe that he proved himself as a NFL quarerback, however, there are some things in which he will look to improve upon before he’s given another chance.
“I think I proved I can be a guy in this league for a long, long time,” Minshew added. “I think they believe that. And there’s other things we’re going to get better at so the next time I do get this opportunity, I’ll be ready and I’ll be better and we’re all going to progress together.”
Minshew not only proved that there is a place in the league for him, but he played well enough to make fans wonder if he’s a starter. During his stretch of eight starts he was named Pepsi Rookie of the Week six times and Rookie of the Month in September. Statistically, he finished his stint as a starter 188-of-307 (61.2%) for 2,285 yards, 13 touchdowns, four picks and a quarterback rating of 92.8.
For the Jags, they now should feel very comfortable if Foles sustains another injury and Minshew has to step in. Heading forward, it will also be interesting to see Minshew’s development in the offseason and preseason as he builds upon the starts he received this year.
Notre Dame – Claypool in Senior Bowl
I talked last week about how Chase Claypool’s development as a WR throughout his career has opened eyes in the college football world, but also by scouts at the next level. Well, it looks like he’s going to have an even greater opportunity to raise …
I talked last week about how Chase Claypool’s development as a WR throughout his career has opened eyes in the college football world, but also by scouts at the next level.
Well, it looks like he’s going to have an even greater opportunity to raise his draft stock in the eyes of evaporators with an invitation to the Senior Bowl.
The @Reeses #SeniorBowl would like to welcome WR Chase Claypool (@ChaseClaypool) to the 2020 Senior Bowl! @NDFootball #GoIrish #TheDraftStartsInMOBILE pic.twitter.com/k5R9whJLUz
— Reese's Senior Bowl (@seniorbowl) November 14, 2019
In recent years, with the boom of NFL Draft interest, the Senior Bowl has become the premier event for NFL personnel executives to further evaluate prospects. Current Executive Director of the Reese’s Senior Bowl and 18-year NFL scout Jim Nagy has done a tremendous job using social media to promote the event and publicize those players getting invites to the week.
I emphasize week, not game, because it is really the measurements, practices and workout that provide evalutators with the analysis they’re looking for.
The crop of wide receivers for the 2020 NFL Draft is being hailed as one of the best ever by many draft analysts. Eligible prospects include Alabama’s Jerry Jeudy, Henry Ruggs, and DeVonta Smith, Clemson’s Tee Higgins, Colorado’s Laviska Shenault, Oklahoma’s CeeDee Lamb, Minnesota’s Tyler Johnson, USC’s Michael Pittman, Texas’ Collin Johnson, TCU’s Jalen Reagor, and Oklahoma State’s Tylan Wallace.
Absolutely is 👍👍👍👍👍
— Dan Shonka (@Ourlads_Shonka) November 13, 2019
Bears rookie draft class has played fewest snaps in the NFL
Despite receiving high praise coming out of the 2019 NFL Draft, the Bears’ 2019 draft class has been nowhere to be seen.
It’s been nearly seven months since the 2019 NFL Draft concluded in Nashville, and 254 players saw their NFL dreams come true. Five of those eventually becoming Chicago Bears.
Running back David Montgomery, wide receiver Riley Ridley, cornerback Duke Shelley, running back Kerrith Whyte Jr. and cornerback Stephen Denmark rounded out the 2019 Bears rookie class, a group that received high marks following the draft.
But despite the high praise, you may have noticed that outside of Montgomery, the Bears rookie class has been nowhere to be seen. It’s not your eyes playing tricks on you, it’s reality.
After calculating each team’s snap counts via Pro Football Reference through Week 10 of the NFL season, the Bears rookie draft class has played a total of just 366 snaps, the fewest in the NFL. For context, NFL rookie draft classes have averaged 1,441 snaps. The New York Giants, led by quarterback Daniel Jones, have the most snaps at 3,226.
Out of the Bears’ 366 snaps, Montgomery, their top draft pick selected in the third round, accounts for 329 and Shelley, their sixth-round pick, has played the remaining 37 plays. Ridley, Whyte Jr., and Denmark have yet to see the field.
Without a first or second round pick due to trades involving outside linebacker Khalil Mack and wide receiver Anthony Miller, respectively, the Bears relied on their mid-round picks to find talent.
General manager Ryan Pace has had success in rounds 3-7 throughout his tenure, finding gems such as safety Adrian Amos, linebacker Nick Kwiatkoski, safety Eddie Jackson, running back Tarik Cohen, and defensive tackle Bilal Nichols, who contributed immediately in the regular season and/or developed into solid players in the NFL.
But after a slew of success in those rounds, the Bears appear to have stalled this season, only utilizing one rookie regularly in games. While they did tie with the New Orleans Saints for the fewest amount of picks in the draft, the Saints’ rookie class has played 1,095 snaps so far in 2019, ranked 23rd in the league.
With such few picks, the need to hit on draft picks is more crucial than ever. Montgomery has shown flashes of his hard-nosed running that made him a popular back while at Iowa State.
Ridley was touted as a precise route-running receiver who would translate well to the next level, and Shelley was a ball hawk at Kansas State before injuring his ankle, hurting his draft stock. Both players are on the active roster, but have been healthy scratches for most, if not all the games. Ridley has not been active for any game this year and Shelley last played in Week 4 against Minnesota on special teams. Whyte Jr. and Denmark have spent the season on the practice squad.
With six games remaining and a spot in the playoffs still achievable, it’s unlikely fans will see the other members of the rookie draft class barring injury. But at some point, Matt Nagy and the rest of the coaching staff need to know what they have in their rookies and how they can contribute in 2020 and beyond.
[lawrence-related id=430761,430769,430740,430737,430714]