Michael Conlan dominates Vladimir Nikitin, gets his redemption

Michael Conlan dominated Vladimir Nikitin in almost every conceivable way to win a 10-round featherweight bout Saturday in New York City.

It’s not an Olympic medal but Michael Conlan will take it.

Three years ago, at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, the Irishman was eliminated by Vladimir Nikitin of Russia in the quarterfinals by a decision that didn’t reflect what happened in the ring. The Irishman famously let the judges know how he felt by showing them his middle finger.

This evening, on the Terence Crawford-Egidijus Kavaliauskas card, Conlan got the only redemption available to him.

Conlan dominated Nikitin in almost every conceivable way in a 10-round featherweight bout, outboxing him, outslugging him and ultimately outpointing him by a wide margin in front of his adopted fans at Madison Square Garden in New York City.

This time the scores were spot on: 98-92, 99-91 and 100-90, all for Conlan.

“I always said I had no ill feelings toward Vladimir, nothing personal. I just had to get that one back,” Conlan said in the ring afterward.

Conlan (13-0, 7 KOs) controlled the fight from the opening bell. In the early rounds, he was content to keep his distance from the aggressive Nikitin and outbox him, jabbing, pounding his body with consistency, landing shots to the head and moving when trouble approached.

Then, in the second half of the contest, Conlan decided to fight Nikitin’s fight by standing toe to toe with him at times. However, even then, even though he stepped bravely into a danger zone, he still got the better of the exchanges.

The only thing Conlan couldn’t do was knock out Nikitin (3-1, 0 KOs), although his body work and hard shots to the head late in the fight certainly got his opponent’s attention.

Conlan seemed to enjoy the inside exchanges, which pumped life into what became an entertaining fight, but he said afterward that it probably wasn’t a good idea when he could’ve cruised to victory from the outside.

“You could see, when I wanted to trade, I could do it better than him,” he said, “but this game is about longevity.”

Conlan didn’t want to discuss his future after the fight, saying his immediate goal is to enjoy his Christmas dinner. He did say that he expects to fight for a world title within a year, which is another dream of his.

He can focus 100 percent on that now. The Olympic thing has been settled.

 

 

Terence Crawford, Egidjius Kavaliasukas make weight

Terence Crawford and Egidjius Kavaliasukas both made weight for their main event welterweight clash on Saturday at Madison Square Garden.

Terence Crawford and Egidjius Kavaliasukas both made weight for their welterweight clash on Saturday at Madison Square Garden in New York City on ESPN. At stake is Crawford’s welterweight title.

Omaha’s Crawford (30-5, 26 KOs) weighed in at the 147-pound limit. Lithuania’s Kavaliauskas (21-0-1, 17 KOs) weighed 146½.

For the undercard, titleholder Richard Commey (29-2, 26 KOs) and challenger Teofimo Lopez (14-0, 11 KOs) both stepped on the scales at 134¼ pounds for their 12-round lightweight fight.

Also, Mick Conlan (12-0, 7 KOs) weighed in at 125½, while Vladimir Nikitin (3-0) weighed the limit of 126 for their 10-round featherweight bout, a rematch of their meeting in the 2016 Olympics, in which Nikitin won a controversial decision.

Terence Crawford and his cul-de-sac at welterweight

Whatever happens on Saturday night, Richard Commey and Teofimo Lopez have a future path. The same can’t be said for Terence Crawford.

NEW YORK – Whoever wins the lightweight title fight between champion Richard Commey and Teofimo Lopez on Saturday night at Madison Square Garden will have a lot more going on for him than just bragging rights or, in Lopez’s case, new hardware.

He’ll have a little something called momentum.

Commey-Lopez is not only the best on-paper matchup of the night, far exceeding the main event between welterweight titleholder Terence Crawford and Egidijus Kavaliauskas (we’ll get to that later). The winner could also go on to face Vasiliy Lomachenko in a unification of three of the four major lightweight belts next year. With apologies to newly minted lightweight titleholder Devin Haney, whose network allegiances make him a non-starter in this discussion, that is as about as good as it can get today in a sport beset by shoddy matchmaking and warring tribalism.

In other words, Commey-Lopez isn’t your typical boxing one-off that takes place in isolation, subject to a short half-life and a few forgettable column inches. No, its precise appeal is that it is freighted with significance beyond the 36 minutes (likely less) of combat that will unfold in the ring on Saturday night. And that’s a breath of fresh air, considering that the value of certain titleholders today are inseparable from the presumed significance of the particular alphabet-soup trinket they hold. One thinks immediately of WBO super middleweight titleholder Billy Joe Saunders and the WBO middleweight titleholder Demetrius Andrade, both of whom have fought virtually nobody of note to merit the high perch they occupy in their respective divisions.

Commey-Lopez is the latest brick laid down by promoter Top Rank toward what figures to be the edifice that will one day house the lightweight division’s most accomplished fighter. And the company did it by dutifully adding the most consequential 135-pounders, such as Ray Beltran, to their stable. They did it by scooping up Lopez from the 2016 Olympics, by getting in touch with Commey’s promoter Lou DiBella last year, by having Lomachenko outslug the likes of Pedraza and Luke Campbell (for a vacant title) earlier this year.

Commey-Lopez: Call it the big picture approach.

Alas, the same can’t be said for the fight that follows on Saturday night. Indeed, there is an air of banality surrounding titleholder Terence Crawford’s fight against undefeated Lithuanian contender Egidijus Kavaliauskas.

Even the fight’s usual carnival barkers seem to have caught on to this and have adjusted their brand of ballyhoo accordingly. Instead of selling Crawford-Kavaliauskas as a matchup of supreme consequence, they have sought to paint it as a rare opportunity to catch one of the great improvisers in the sport in action. During an ESPN segment, Teddy Atlas compared Crawford’s ring “instincts” to Jimi Hendrix riffing on the guitar, Bobby Fischer overlooking a chess board, and Louis Armstrong blowing the trumpet. “(Crawford) creates it as he does it,” Atlas said. “He’s got the greatest instincts I’ve ever seen.” Sitting beside Atlas, Max Kellerman, no stranger to rhetorical overkill himself, guffawed upon hearing that comment.

Actually, from a contemporary standpoint, Atlas isn’t entirely wrong. Few fighters have shown themselves to be as versatile and creative in the ring as Crawford. At some point, however, such claims must be born out in the ring against the very best.

Unfortunately, Crawford is Exhibit A in the ramifications wrought by the sport’s frustrating political divide. Unlike its lightweight stable, Top Rank simply does not have the key players at welterweight to fulfill on the promise of a generational talent like Crawford. Unlike Commey-Lopez, Crawford-Kavaliauskas doesn’t lead anywhere. There is no conceivable Lomachenko for Crawford waiting in the wings. Crawford’s best possible opponents – Errol Spence, Manny Pacquiao, Shawn Porter, Danny Garcia and Keith Thurman – are all aligned with Al Haymon’s Premier Boxing Champions, which understandably prefers to do their own round robin of fights. Moreover, whatever hope there was that the two sides could come together to stage a Crawford-Spence bout appears to have gone out the window in the wake of Spence’s harrowing car accident in October. At the very least, that fight is on the back-burner.

Crawford’s seemingly hamstrung future has had the effect of completely whitewashing his opponent, Kavaliauskas, a two-time Olympian who is known to crack with both hands. Kavaliauskas is no schlub, but his last fight, a draw against a distinctly mediocre Ray Robinson, did much to lower his stock. But Crawford, to be sure, is simply graded on a different scale. It is difficult to imagine what Kavaliauskas could bring to the ring that will trouble Crawford.

A saving grace for Crawford may be the current crop of elite junior welterweights who will all likely move up to 147 at some point, including Top Rank stablemate Jose Ramirez, Josh Taylor and Regis Prograis. But that development might take a year or more, which is an eternity for a fighter who is already 32 years old. 

The difference with Hendrix and Armstrong? They were soloists whose virtuosities did not necessarily rely on anyone else. In boxing, they call that shadowboxing.

Bob Arum believes Errol Spence could be sidelined throughout 2020

Promoter Bob Arum said he has inside information that leads him to believe Errol Spence, injured in a car crash, will not fight in 2020.

Bob Arum says he has “grave doubts” about whether Errol Spence Jr. will fight in the “foreseeable future.’’

In an interview with iFL TV, Arum said he has been told that Spence, who was thrown from his Ferrari in a scary crash on Oct. 10, will be out of the ring throughout 2020 and possibly the following year.

“I have received some inside intelligence that allows me to say that,’’ Arum said.

Arum declined to identify his source.

“I don’t think that would be appropriate, but it is good information,” Arum said. “It’s – very unfortunately –very good information.”

Arum made the comments in relation to a question about the chances of Terence Crawford fighting Spence in a welterweight unification bout. Arum, Top Rank’s chairman, promotes Crawford, who faces Lithuanian Egidjius Kavaliauskas on Saturday night at New York’s Madison Square Garden on ESPN. Spence is tied to Al Haymon’s Premier Boxing Champions.

“I don’t think (Crawford-Spence) will happen next year,” Arum said. “I don’t think it’ll happen the year after. And it’s not because promoters don’t want it to happen.’’

There have been no updates from Spence or PBC regarding his future since the single-car crash in Dallas. Spence, who scored a split decision over Shawn Porter on Sept. 28 in Los Angeles, reportedly suffered facial lacerations and damage to his teeth. He was charged with DUI after his release from a Dallas hospital.

“Let’s pass on Errol Spence because until we see him face-to-face, until he appears in public, until we can establish that he’s ready to go back into the ring, it’s unfortunate, but let’s not talk about him,’’ Arum said. “He’s a lovely young man. That was a horrible accident that he had. And just leave it at that.”

Michael Conlan finally has chance to finish story that started in Rio

Michael Conlan is best known for being cheated at the 2016 Olympics. Now he has the chance to beat the fighter who had his hand raised.

Michael Conlan, a promising young featherweight, is still known more for what he did than what he is expected to do. Two upraised fingers, one on each upraised hand, were his way of saying goodbye to the amateurs three years ago at the Rio de Janeiro Olympics.

It was profane. Popular, too.

Conlan expressed what many have thought about Olympic boxing and the lousy decisions that have left a stench ever since the Roy Jones Jr. heist at the 1988 Seoul Games.

Conlan’s gesture said it all then.

He intends to say some more Saturday night.

But this time he promises his only gesture will be a beating of Russian Vladimir Nikitin on the Terence Crawford-Egidijus Kavaliauskas undercard at New York’s Madison Square Garden on ESPN+.

“A demolition job,’’ Conlan said at a media workout Tuesday.

A demolition of the past, perhaps, with what Conlan hopes is a comprehensive beating that will leave little doubt about how bad the judging was in Rio.

“I want to right the wrong of what happened in Rio,” he said.

Ireland’s Michael Conlan (right, punching Mexico’s Ruben Garcia Hernandez) is 12-0 as a pro but hasn’t forgotten his Olympic disappointment. AP Photo / Frank Franklin II

Nikitin, badly bloodied, got a decision that kept Conlan, a 2012 bronze medalist, from moving on to a chance at the gold medal he had always wanted. Nikitin withdrew from his next bout, which would have been against eventual silver-medalist Shakur Stevenson. The Russian Federation said Nikitin suffered unspecified injuries against Conlan. Nikitin wound up with a bronze medal anyway.

Meanwhile, Conlan left Rio without a medal, yet with rock-and-roll-like notoriety. He also gained a reputation for defiance, always a good thing to have in the pro ranks.

He even tweeted to Russian President Vladimir Putin, asking him how much it cost to pay off the judges. No word on whether Putin saw the tweet. He might have been too busy reading Donald Trump’s twitter account

Anyway, Conway went home to Belfast beloved. At a corner in his Catholic neighborhood, there’s a mural of him, spread across one wall. He was celebrated for his honesty in Rio. Yet there was always a lingering desire to finish the story. Now he has the chance to deliver the final punctuation point and move on.

“This fight is a long time coming,’’ Conlan (12-0, 7 KOs) said. ‘We were supposed to fight in August, but Vladimir got injured. I’m excited. We’re ready to rock, and the fans in New York can expect a big performance.

“Listen, regardless of what I think about the (amateur) judges, I have never officially beaten him. I need to go out there and get my hand raised.’’

Conlan also said he bears no personal animus for Nikitin, who resides in Oxnard, Calif. At 29, Nikitin, is getting a late start in the pros. He’s 3-0, all by decision and all three in the U.S.

“We fought twice, and I won both times,’’ said Nikitin, who also beat Conlan in 2013. “I know this is the professional game, and I am happy that I have to chance to prove that I am once again the better fighter.”

Terence Crawford faces Egidijus Kavaliauskas and then uncertainty

Terence Crawford faces mandatory challenger Egidijus Kavaliauskas on Saturday in New York.

Terence Crawford is in New York for some mandatory business Saturday, favored to beat Lithuanian welterweight challenger Egidijus Kavaliauskas at Madison Square Garden and still ranked first or second in the pound-pound debate, yet uncertain about what awaits him in 2020.

Crawford hears rumors and smiles. Depending on the day or perhaps the hour, Floyd Mayweather is coming back. Or maybe not. It’s still not clear what Errol Spence Jr. will do two months after he was thrown from his Ferrari in a scary wreck on Oct. 10 in Dallas.

Crawford was asked about both this week in a media tour that included Ariel Helwani’s MMA Show on ESPN, which will televise his title defense after college football crowns its pound-for-pound best with the Heisman.

Question: Who does he have a better chance at fighting next year, Mayweather or Spence?

“Neither,’’ Crawford said.

Even if Mayweather does come back for more than an exhibition, the feared Crawford doesn’t expect to be anywhere on his list of potential opponents.

“That fight will never happen, I believe,’’ he said.

Meanwhile, there’s been no word on what Spence plans to do.

“Me and Spence fight, I don’t really know,’’ Crawford said. “I don’t know his health reasons right now. I know when he comes back to the fight game, he’s not itching to get back in the ring against me right off the injuries.’’

There had been a groundswell of talk from fans and media, all urging Crawford-vs.-Spence, in the immediate aftermath of Spence’s split-decision over Shawn Porter for two welterweight belts on Sept. 28 in Los Angeles. But there’s only been silence since Spence’s single-car crash.

Terence Crawford: Inability to lure PBC fighters into ring, ‘It’s frustrating’

Terence Crawford admits that the inability to make deals to face his PBC rivals is frustrating.

Terence Crawford wants to fight his welterweight counterparts at Premier Boxing Champions. The fact he can’t, he said, “It’s frustrating.”

Crawford (35-0, 26 knockouts) is scheduled to defend his 147-pound belt against mandatory challenger Egidijus Kavaliauskas (21-0-1, 17 KOs) on Dec. 14 in New York City. He’d rather be fighting Errol Spence, Shawn Porter, Manny Pacquiao or Keith Thurman, all of whom are managed by PBC.

The problem is the fighters’ affiliations. Crawford is promoted by Top Rank, whose fights are televised on ESPN. PBC has a deal with Fox and Showtime. And cross-platform agreements are hard to reach, especially when one side (PBC) has all the fighters it needs to make good matchups.

Crawford expressed his feelings in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.

“It’s frustrating but I look at it as a business move by them not to fight me,” said Crawford, referring to the inability to make these fights. “I’m not going to knock them or be a hater, but I know where I stand and I know the game they’re playing and there’s nothing I can do about it.

“I just have to focus on what I can do and keep making a living and keeping my name up there as the best pound-for-pound fighter.”

Crawford seems particularly pessimistic about a possible matchup with Spence, his greatest rival for welterweight supremacy. Spence, recovering from injuries suffered in a car accident, is expected to fight next year.

“I don’t know if that fight will ever happen,” he said. “That’s not something I can decide. It takes two people to fight, and it takes two companies to sit down and figure it out and decide what network we’re going to fight on, where we’re going to fight, what the purses are going to be. It’s not as easy as people think it is, but it could be easy if we finally sat down at the same table and made it happen.”

He went on: “I’m willing to fight all those guys, but it’s not up to me to decide if I’m going to fight them or if I’m not going to fight them. I’m open to fighting all those guys. I’ve been saying that from Day 1. Nothing has changed. I’m the best fighter in the division and I’m always willing to prove it.”

“… Bob is willing to make any fight happen,” Crawford said. “At the end of the day, it’s not up to Bob. It’s up to me. The fighters are the ones that fight, and without us, there’s no promotion. So if a fighter really wants a fight to happen, he can make it happen. You can tell them, ‘Listen, this is the fight I want and I’m not fighting until I get that fight.’ It’s simple. At the end of the day, they work for us. If we don’t fight, nobody is going to get paid, so they have to make the fights that the fighters want.”

Crawford, 32, told The Times that he wants to accomplish as much as possible before he retires in three to four years.

“I still want to be the undisputed welterweight champion of the world,” he said, “and I believe I’ll be the first to be undisputed in two divisions, back-to-back. I just want to leave a mark on the sport of boxing so people talk about me like they talk about the other great champions before me. That’s my goal before I retire.”

5 things to be grateful for this Thanksgiving holiday

There is a lot to be grateful for in boxing. Here are five things that make me feel fortunate on Thanksgiving.

We all have a lot to be grateful for on this Thanksgiving. Here are five things in the boxing world that make me feel fortunate.

  1. A heavyweight who can knock out a Tyrannosaurus rex. I can understand where the purists are coming from. Deontay Wilder doesn’t have the sublime skill set that normally separates the great fighters from the rest. All I know is how I feel when Wilder lands those bombs to end his fights instantly. There is nothing like it in sports. I’m going to enjoy him as long as he’s around.
  2. The spirit of the underdog. The oddsmakers generally know what they’re doing when they make one fighter a favorite – sometimes a prohibitive favorite – over another fighter. Thank goodness not every underdog buys into the prevailing wisdom. I think we’re all inspired by the fighters who overcome the odds, the “Rockys,” if you will. I’m thinking of you Andy Ruiz Jr. and Julian Williams.
  3. The talent at the top: Non-fans ask me occasionally, “What happened to boxing? Where are the great fighters?” They’re there. Uber-talents like Vassiliy Lomachenko, Terence Crawford, Canelo Alvarez, Naoya Inoue, Oleksandr Usyk, Gennadiy Golovkin, Errol Spence, et al would’ve been successful in any era and are a joy to watch. I just wish more sports fans were aware of that.
  4. An abundance of dates. The dying sport certainly produces a lot of shows, both on television and streaming services. ESPN, ESPN+, Fox, Showtime, DAZN and others have made major investments in the sport. And the quality of the cards has generally been very good. If we could only keep MMA fighters and YouTubers out of the picture.
  5. The fighters themselves. They will always be what I’m most grateful for. These young (sometimes not-so-young) men and women risk their very well being to pursue their dreams and entertain us every time they step through the ropes. From the superstars to the journeymen, they need to know that we appreciate them and what they do. I’ll always admire them.

Pound-for-pound: Should Deontay Wilder be on the list?

Is it time to give Deontay Wilder pound-for-pound consideration? The short answer is “no.” That’s not a knock on Wilder, who deserves respect for what he has accomplished over the past five years. It simply means that he isn’t among the 15 best …

Is it time to give Deontay Wilder pound-for-pound consideration? The short answer is “no.”

That’s not a knock on Wilder, who deserves respect for what he has accomplished over the past five years. It simply means that he isn’t among the 15 best fighters in the world regardless of weight, which is what pound-for-pound is.

First of all, Wilder isn’t even the top heavyweight. The vast majority of those who saw his draw with Tyson Fury last December thought Fury, who is included in “Honorable Mention” here, deserved the decision even though he went down twice.

Honest observers have to be able to see through poor judging when assessing fighters.

And we have to stick with the definition of pound-for-pound. Consider this question: If Vassily Lomachenko and Terence Crawford were 6-foot-4 and around 220 pounds yet retained their skills and speed, how would they fare against Wilder?

Wilder’s punching power can be the deciding factor against anyone. At the same time, the heavyweight titleholder has never faced boxers with anywhere near the ability of Lomachenko and Crawford. The closest we could come to them in terms of skill set throughout history is Muhammad Ali, who was a once-in-a-century talent.

Deontay Wilder should be admired for his string of knockouts but he’s not a pound-for-pounder yet. Ryan Hafey / Premier Boxing Champions

We imagine that Lomachenko and Crawford would drive Wilder mad with their mobility, their quickness, their overall ability. Luis Ortiz, who Wilder stopped with one punch in the seventh round Saturday in Las Vegas, is a good boxer but he’s light years behind our Nos. 1 and 2 pound-for-pound.

The only fighter better than Ortiz on Wilder’s resume is Fury and we know what happened there. Who else has he beaten? His next toughest opponent might’ve been Bermane Stiverne, who isn’t exactly the type of fight against whom you demonstrate your pound-for-pound credentials.

To be fair to Wilder, we should mention that heavyweights are at a disadvantage against smaller fighters in this discussion. A man 6-foot-7, like Wilder, just can’t be expected to move like a smaller fighter. And smaller fighters can move up in weight in pursuit of more opportunities to prove their mettle.

Wilder understands that.

“When you’re dealing with the pound-for-pound list, I really don’t think it belongs in the heavyweight division,” Wilder said the news conference following the Ortiz fight. “We can only be in one division. We can’t go up and down like all of the smaller fighters, so it doesn’t really apply to us.”

We don’t agree completely. Again, Fury is an “honorable mention” here. And, certainly, Ali, Larry Holmes and perhaps other big men had the unusual ability to crack the pound-for-pound list during their eras.

For now, though, we believe it’s best to appreciate Wilder’s chilling knockouts and refrain from comparing him to the best all-around fighters in other divisions. And we can have this discussion again if he knocks out Fury.

Check out our Top 15 list below. And let us know what you think.

BOXING JUNKIE

POUND-FOR-POUND

  1. Vasiliy Lomachenko
  2. Terence Crawford
  3. Canelo Alvarez
  4. Naoya Inoue
  5. Oleksandr Usyk
  6. Gennadiy Golovkin
  7. Errol Spence
  8. Juan Francisco Estrada
  9. Mikey Garcia
  10. Artur Beterbiev
  11. Josh Taylor
  12. Manny Pacquiao
  13. Srisaket Sor Rungvisai
  14. Leo Santa Cruz
  15. Kosei Tanaka

Honorable mention (alphabetical order): Miguel Berchelt, Mairis Briedis, Tyson Fury, Shawn Porter, Julian Williams

Fox Exec says network will have ‘best of the best,’ own ‘PBC belts’

Bill Wanger, executive vice president of programming for Fox Sports, appeared on the Chris Mannix podcast last week to discuss boxing.

Al Haymon may stay tight-lipped when it comes to the media, but Bill Wanger apparently has no such qualms.

Wanger, the executive vice president of programming at Fox Sports, appeared on the Chris Mannix boxing podcast last week and, well, he had a few interesting things to say. Wanger expounded on everything from the network’s multi-year deal with Haymon’s Premier Boxing Champions to his thoughts on the boxing landscape at large.

Here are some snippets.

On sharing fighters with Showtime

Given that longtime cable broadcaster Showtime also has a multi-year deal with the PBC, one of the biggest questions in the past year was how Haymon went about apportioning his roster to satisfy the needs of both networks. When Mannix brought up this specific point, Wanger was blunt about Fox having the “premier package.”

“Our deal with the PBC is to be in the premier position and to have the premier package,” Wanger said. “So a lot of who takes what between Fox and Showtime is already taken care of in the contractual process. … We have a contract with the PBC with a certain number of fights to be in the premier position. At the end of the day, that’s what we’re going to have. We’re not too worried about that.”

When Mannix asked Wanger to clarify what he meant by “premier,” Wanger responded, “At the end of the day, we get the best fights and the top stars. Showtime will have what they’re going to have. But Fox will have the best of the best.”

On making fights with rival networks and promoters

Another topic was boxing’s fragmented business. Mannix suggested the possibility of more cross-promotional events, in which fighters would appear  on rival networks. Wanger doesn’t see that as a priority for the network, citing PBC’s vast roster as a sign of its “self-sufficiency.”

“The PBC and Fox have 99 percent of the top fighters,” Wanger said. “Yes, there are a few on the other platforms, but we’re totally self-sufficient. Those guys are actually having difficulty making the fights they need for their fighters, whether its Terence Crawford or Canelo (Alvarez) and so on and so forth.”

Wanger would not confirm or deny a reported joint pay-per-view deal between Fox and ESPN to showcase the projected rematch of Deontay Wilder vs. Tyson Fury in 2020, but he made it clear that each network has their own corporate agenda to adhere to. 

“I think that in this new dynamic, this new world of DAZN in the business and ESPN in the business and PBC in the business with Fox and Showtime, yeah there is rooting interest (for certain fighters and fights), quite selfishly,” he said.

On the likelihood of an Errol Spence-Terence Crawford showdown

Wanger poured cold water over a potential Errol Spence-Terence Crawford welterweight title-unification fight. He made it clear that Spence has no reason to rush into a fight with Crawford, not when he has other options at his disposal within the PBC roster, including Danny Garcia, Keith Thurman, and Manny Pacquiao.

“With regards to Errol, the PBC has a stacked welterweight division and there are plenty of fights that Errol can have well before he needs to fight Terence Crawford,” Wanger said. “And again if Errol and his team have a desire to fight Terence Crawford, a deal can be made.

“Errol’s gotta take care of business inside the PBC family, and … once he does that (and) the time is right and he wants to fight Terence Crawford, they’ll make the fight.”

On PBC creating their own title belts

Mannix took Wanger to task for Fox’s refusal to recognize WBO welterweight titleholder Crawford on graphics depicting the top titleholders in the division. Wanger offered a somewhat circular rationale, stating that they feel the WBA, WBC, and IBF belts are “the most important belts” because they’re “the ones that have traditionally been around the longest (and) are the ones we will recognize.” Mannix mentioned the fact that Fox leaves out the WBO but recognizes a secondary title from the WBA, at which point Wanger dropped this nugget:

“You know what we’re going to do with the PBC, and we’re on our way to do this … as things fall in the place. We are going to have a PBC belt and a PBC champion, lets say of the heavyweight division. So play this out, Andy Ruiz (a PBC fighter) beats Anthony Joshua again and eventually you have Andy Ruiz and Deontay Wilder fighting for the PBC heavyweight title. You could do that potentially with the welterweights, you could do that at 154 pounds, you could do that at 168 pounds.”

Wanger did not clarify whether this meant that the PBC would no longer collaborate with the three other sanctioning bodies. In any case, it’s clear that Wanger believes that insofar as the heavyweight (on the condition that Ruiz beats Joshua), welterweight, junior middleweight and supper middleweight divisions are concerned, there is no reason for the PBC to branch out to make fights.

On Jermall Charlo fighting potentially on a different platform.

The PBC doesn’t have depth in the middleweight division. When Mannix pointed out that most of the top 160-pound fighters are on DAZN, which has left WBC titleholder Jermall Charlo out of the mix, Wanger hinted that you may see Charlo hopping over to another network for the time being.

“Yeah, Al’s taking care of Jermall and putting him on a path where he might not be on our platforms for the next few fights, but he’ll come back,” he said.