Meet Brycen Hopkins, the Purdue TE aiming to dominate the NFL Combine

Check out Draft Wire’s exclusive interview with Purdue tight end prospect Brycen Hopkins

This year’s NFL draft class of tight ends features several talented prospects, but perhaps none are as physically gifted as Purdue’s Brycen Hopkins.

At 6-foot-4 and 245 pounds, with long arms and a basketball background that gives him a sizable athletic advantage against almost any defender he goes up against, Hopkins will be one of the highest tight ends in demand in the 2020 draft. If a team is looking for a playmaker at the position early in the draft, he would be a player worth targeting.

Draft Wire recently talked exclusively with Hopkins about his transition from basketball to football, growing up with an NFL player as a dad, his Senior Bowl performance and his aspirations for the 2020 Scouting Combine.

JI: You started off as a basketball player in high school, but made the switch the football your junior year. What made you decide to join the football team that year?

BH: Going into high school, I was always a basketball, baseball kind of guy. I had never really played football; I played in the backyard a little bit, but never as part of an organization. My junior year – kind of my sophomore year, really – I started seeing myself getting bigger. High school comes and you’re hitting the weights and you start seeing some results in that area.

I knew I had the athleticism for it, [but] I wasn’t sure what position I would play. I didn’t really know any of the positions anyway, I knew some them, but I decided to go out there. They put me out there at tight end for spring ball – I think that might’ve been 2012, I want to say – they put me at spring ball tight end, outside linebacker, defensive end. But really it was just that I saw myself getting bigger in the weight room, and I thought maybe I could apply my athleticism to the field instead of basketball. I wasn’t getting the looks that I wanted from as many D-1 schools that I wanted for basketball. I would say I was a good player, but I didn’t have the size to play the position I wanted.

Jeff Hanisch-USA TODAY Sports

JI: Eventually, you did get those D-1 offers for football. How did your high school coaches react to what was pretty much instant success when you joined the team?

BH: It’s funny, because [former Purdue wide receivers and tight ends] coach Gerad Parker, who was the recruiting coach who came down to the school, he wasn’t even there for me; I think he was there to see one of our safeties. He just kind of saw me out there practicing, running, catching, he saw my athleticism and he was really interested in that. He knew how basketball could correlate football and how the athleticism could easily transfer if you were willing to put in the effort. So he kept an eye on me and kept visiting after that.

About the third time he came down to see me, we were playing pickup on a basketball court on one of the days after school during the offseason. I dunked on somebody and he offered me right there. He pulled me into the hallway and he said, ‘we’re going to offer you here, if that’s something you’re willing to do’. I said, ‘yeah, of course. I don’t really know what the plan is here, but I’ll run with it. I think it’s a great opportunity for me, and I’m willing to take advantage of it’.

JI: Even though you had clear physical tools, you had a relative lack of experience heading into college. Did that give you a chip on your shoulder when going up against guys who had played for longer?

BH: To a certain extent, I would say. I might have had a little bit of a chip on my shoulder, but I still lacked that confidence that I needed. The change in my confidence from my freshman year to my senior year was incredible; that just came with repetition. Going into [Purdue], I said ‘man, I’ve only have two years on my shoulder, I don’t know how I even got here, really. There must something that people see in me that I have the ability to succeed at this level. Sure enough, all my coaching staff, they just kept reassuring me, ‘stick with it’. You could be a good player if you just put your mind to it’, and that’s what I did.

Over the years, I’ve just trying to get better. I’ve worked on the mental aspect a lot more on the physical, because I was kind of born and gifted by God with those talents, so I tried to focus on the mental aspect to make it easier on the field for me so I didn’t have to rely so much on thinking; I could just react to it.

JI: Part of that physical ability has to come from genetics, with your dad having played as a Pro Bowl lineman for the Titans. Did spending those early years of your life around influence your desire to go pro?

BH: As a kid, I wouldn’t say it influenced me; I was just along for the ride. I enjoyed it, I liked the sport, I thought it was cool, but I had such a love for basketball that I was like, ‘this is what I want to do’. I didn’t really pay too much attention to it, but then, once I actually started playing my junior year, that’s when I saw how the path could be laid out for me it that might be able to help me and influence me to actually try and make it to the NFL.

When I first got my first college offer, I was in shock. I never even thought that I’d be playing football in college. I didn’t really think that I had what it took; I didn’t know what it took, but I was just kind of ignorant in that area and kind of doubted myself, you know? Once I started to actually get the reps in that I needed, I saw myself progress as a player. I could tell that the gifts that dad and mom gave me were going to pay off if I just stuck with it, so I would say it really influenced me once I actually started playing.

NCAA Football: Texas Christian at Purdue
Marc Lebryk-USA TODAY Sports

JI: During your time at Purdue, you guys had some extremely talented offenses. What were your experiences playing under head coach Jeff Brohm?

BH: As soon as coach Jeff Brohm came in, all I heard was ‘this guy likes tight ends, this should be a good opportunity for you’. I believed it, I trusted him. Coming in, I could already tell once I started learning the offense how it was going to be based around tight ends, how much he loved to run the spread and throw the ball, and how I could use my athleticism out there in the flex, as well as being a dual-threat tight end helping with the run blocking game. As soon as he came in, I just knew I had an opportunity here, and I was going to have to step up my play, because they were going to be expecting a lot of me. And that’s exactly what I did; I think I progressed through the years. Starting from 2016 to 2019, I think you’ll see a progression in the level of play. An immense progression, I would say.

JI: What are you going to miss the most about playing at Purdue?

BH: The camaraderie. I haven’t been a part of a team these past few months; I still talk to a lot of them, I’m connected with them, but that’s my family up there. I lived with them, I’ve been there for five years, that’s all I knew. Of course the game atmosphere, too, I miss that. Just putting in all that work in order just to get these 12 to 13 opportunities for us at Purdue. I never made it to a championship or anything like that, but those 12 to 13 opportunities I would get per year where what motivated us to put in that work and just have it pay off every Saturday.

JI: You’re one month removed from the Senior Bowl. What was it like getting the chance to go up against all of those top prospects and learn from NFL coaches?

BH: It was great. It was great for me, it was great for my game, the way that they were able to get the information to me and how I was going to take it and run with it and see what I can do with this information from the next level, how can my skills translate to the next level, and also going against such great competition: it’s the best of the best, all across the country, altogether at one spot. So you kind of see how your skills have really built over the years of going against the competition that if you do well, it gives you confidence, and if you do poorly, it might get you down a little bit, but there’s nothing wrong with that as long as you just stick with it. I think I had a lot of opportunities to show coaches what I was made of and the abilities that I have. Overall, I think the experience was great.

(AP Photo/Darron Cummings)

JI: While you were in Mobile, Senior Bowl executive director Jim Nagy said that you’ll get a 40-inch vertical at the NFL Scouting Combine. Do you think you’ll be able to reach that?

BH: [laughs] I wanna say [Detroit Lions quarterback David] Blough maybe gassed me up on that a bit. A 40-inch vertical would be great. I did just recently jump a 37.5, so I’m trying to get in that 38 range. I don’t know about a 40-inch vertical. I’m more of a basketball guy. You give me a one-foot jump, I think I could easily get there, but that two-foot jump is something different. I think you’ll see how the athleticism correlates to the game, but I don’t know about a 40-inch vert.

JI: Either way, even if you don’t drop 40, those would be some impressive numbers.

BH: For sure, for sure. If I do jump a 40, I’ll make sure to call you and say thanks [laughs].

JI: How has your preparation been for the rest of the Combine drills coming up?

BH: Ever since I got done with the season, I headed straight down to Nashville and started my training immediately. Jordan Luallen at BOOST Performance down there in Nashville has done a great job of just diving into the details and how you want to run these drills, how to be precise and efficient and get the best times and form and everything. I’m confident in the way that he’s built me as a tester.

I’m actually kind of confident going down here that if I just prepare well enough and have a good mindset going into it that I can put up the same numbers I put up at the mock days we would have. If I do that, I think I would have an all-around good Pro Day [and Combine].

JI: You mentioned the vertical jump, but do you have any other benchmarks you’d like to reach for some of those drills?

BH: For the 40, I’m thinking I want to run in the low 4.6s. If I can get into the 4.5s range, which I did a couple times, that would be awesome. I think that that might help my stock a lot. For bench, I want to get 20 reps. For the three-cone, I would love to get below 7 [seconds]. That would be perfect. I ran a 6.75 on the three-cone. On the [20-yard] shuttle, maybe below a 4.2. That’s the mark that I’m going for. All my numbers, I’m trying to be in the top 3 among tight ends. We all related it to the past four years of the Combine; we would look at those numbers to see where we were at. That’s another reason I’m feeling kind of confident.

Trevor Ruszkowski-USA TODAY Sports

JI: What do you think is the most important trait to have for a tight end?

BH: Versatility, for sure. I would say the ability to do what’s asked of you, whether that’s in the blocking game, the run game, or they need you to make a big play down the field or open up gaps and get defenders off the line of scrimmage for the running back. Also, just be a smart player. There’s a lot asked of you; there’s a lot that teams are going to ask you to do. Just do it without questioning it and actually know what to do, I think there’s a lot of value in that, so versatility is my No. 1 answer for sure.

JI: How do you like to spend your time outside of football?

BH: Just hanging out with friends. I play Xbox and stuff. Anything to do with socializing – not really going out, but just having some friends over, going over to a friend’s house, just hanging out and laughing. I’m big into video games, so we get into it there, obviously. I love cars, too, so I have a lot of little hobbies that I’m into, but nothing bigger than football right now.

JI: Do you have a dream car that you’re looking at once you get to the pros?

BH: Man, I actually drive a Mustang right now. I would want to upgrade and get a better Mustang. I won’t say specifically what type. I always wanted one; my dad got me one when I went off to college as part of my scholarship deal. I got a scholarship, so he got me a nice little car, but now I would like to buy myself an even cooler Mustang. That’s my love of cars.

JI: Would that be your first purchase after getting your first NFL paycheck?

BH: I’m not really looking at anything else. I would love to just settle down and invest my money. I’m not looking to make any big purchases other than that. People say that it might depreciate the value, but when you love cars as much as I do, I’ll get every bit of joy out of that thing, so that’s all I’m really looking to do, and I just want to invest my money and let it sit there and work for me. [I’ll] maybe invest in property with that, as well.

JI: Let’s say I’m an NFL general manager. What would I be getting if I drafted you to my team?

BH: You’d be getting whatever you wanted, I would say. Whatever type of player you thought I was, I think I can even surpass that level of that expectation. Like I said earlier, the versatility, you’d be getting an athlete that’s versatile on the field and the ability to do what’s asked of him and actually succeed. I think I have a special ability of making plays downfield, but I’ll also do what’s asked, and the blocking effort is just the willingness to do it. Sticking your head in there, fighting through it, having good form, I think I can do all of that for a team, and I would love to participate to the success of an offense like that. Any way I can contribute to the success, I’m willing to do it.

[vertical-gallery id=613832]

3 takeaways from Wisconsin’s win over Purdue

Wisconsin tops Purdue 69-65 in a game where Aleem Ford pours in a career high 19 points.

The Badgers are hitting their stride at the right time. With five games to go, UW has now won three in a row and four their last five. Three of the last five for Wisconsin come at home, where they are a stour 12-1.

The win over Purdue avenges a 70-51 loss from four weeks ago when they were beat 42-16 on the glass. Wisconsin now finds itself a tie for third in the Big Ten with four other teams and have a manageable schedule the rest of the way. What did we learn from the win over Purdue ?

1. Aleem Ford is playing the best basketball of his career

“Confidence can be portrayed in a lot of ways,” head coach Greg Gard said about Ford. “I thought even though he didn’t score as much at Nebraska, he was aggressive, he was confident.”

In Lincoln, Ford set a career high in rebounds with ten, but only contributed three points. The effort against Nebraska topped a career high of nine rebounds that he had set the game before against the Buckeyes in Madison. Though he couldn’t contribute much offensively against Nebraska, Ford was able to find his rhythm and aggressiveness early and often against the Boilermakers.

He maintained his energy from the past two games having brought down seven rebounds, three of which were offensive rebounds against Purdue. The stretch of three straight games with seven or more rebounds is the first time in his career that he’s been able to do that.

The confidence and energy carried over to the offensive end Tuesday night. At no other time was this more evident than with 10:21 to go in the game when Ford caught the ball on the left wing and used a jab stab to open up some space for his fifth three that earned him a career high of 19 points. Ford isn’t usually someone who looks to create his own offense but the move and shot showcased the kind of roll he was on Tuesday night. 

When asked what they could’ve done to limit Ford, Purdue head coach Matt Painter responded by simply saying: “not let him shoot.”

“Give him credit, he was the difference in the game, in my opinion,” Painter said. “We definitely respect him, it’s not like we went into the game saying ‘let Aleem Ford shoot.’ He’s proven that he can knock down shots.”

Over the last three games, Ford is averaging 10.7 points per game to go along with 8.7 rebounds per game and the junior has hit double figures in four of the last five games. 

2. Free throws have quickly gone from a liability to a strength 

After managing to stop Purdue when up 61-59, it would come down to Wisconsin’s ability to ice the game at the free throw line. With a lineup on the floor that consisted of Brad Davison, D’Mitrik Trice, Nate Reuvers, Brevin Pritzl, and Aleem Ford, the Badgers were primed to do just that. 

With a little over thirty seconds to play, there was a ton of time left for Purdue to pounce on the potential of Wisconsin splitting a pair of free throws or missing both outright but Pritzl and Davison closed out the contest. 

“When you step up for free throws, you have to step up with confidence, you can’t be doubting yourself,” senior Brevin Pritzl said after the game. “Coach Gard puts enough confidence in us, telling us that we are going to go knock it down, telling us to go get the ball.”

Three quick buckets from Purdue and subsequent fouls forced four trips to the line that Davison and Pritzl each alternated calmly stepping up. 

“They did a heck of a job. I don’t know if any of them hit the rim,” Gard said. 

Davison and Pritzl each had two trips to the line and they both sunk their four free throws. The perfect eight for eight shooting capped off a night where the Badgers would finish 19-20 from the charity stripe. 

Just a year after Wisconsin sat second to last in the conference in free throw percentage, at 65%, the Badgers now lead the Big Ten with a mark of 76%.

3. This team is sticking together and finding its groove at the right time

With just five games remaining in the regular season, the Badgers have won four of their last five and have won their last three games. Currently tied for third place in the Big Ten with four other teams, UW couldn’t have picked a better time to get hot. 

“I feel like it’s the perfect time for us to be playing confidently,” Aleem Ford said. 

The Badgers will look to carry this late season surge of momentum into the Big Ten tournament in Indianapolis and the NCAA tournament. 

Lucky for the Badgers, three of their final five games are at home with their two games away from Madison coming against Indiana and Michigan. Wisconsin will look to continue their dominance in the Kohl Center where they are now 12-1. The one loss at home came to Illinois by just one point. 

The recent stretch has come in the middle of some turbulent times at Wisconsin with the departure of Kobe King, the suspension of Brad Davison and the resignation of strength coach Erik Helland who had been with the team for seven years. 

“At the end of the day, you can only control what’s in the room,” senior guard Brevin Pritzl said. “You can’t control what’s on the outside. You have to stick together with your group.”

“I think we’ve continually gotten better and I think we’re playing together. I talked about that before, just the unification and togetherness of this group. We always talk about the whole being greater than the sum of the parts,” Gard added. “They don’t care who does it, they’re very unselfish from that standpoint. As long as our team has success.”

Over this recent stretch, different players have stepped up for the Badgers. Whether it was Pritzl pouring in 19 points against Ohio State, Davison scoring 30 against Nebraska or Ford scoring a career high 19 against the Boilermakers, the team has found different ways to get it done. 

The Badgers are finding their groove at the right time with the Big Ten race heating up. In the midst of a difficult season, UW is squarely in the race for a double bye in the Big Ten tournament.

Wisconsin offense checked several boxes vs Purdue

Wisconsin wins again

Human beings are imperfect, which means sports teams and the athletes who play for them are imperfect as well. Sports — like all other human endeavors — are a theater of the imperfect. In many ways, managing imperfections — limiting them in some circumstances, confining them in others — is the ultimate task of every team. The imperfections will exist; preventing them from spiraling out of control is often the main goal of a team and coaching staff on game night.

If you look at competition and endeavor in this context, the Wisconsin Badgers did a really good job of containing their limitations at the offensive end of the floor on Tuesday night against the Purdue Boilermakers. Wisconsin was hardly dominant or imposing, but the Badgers weren’t terrible, either. This conveys a simple yet often overlooked truth of sports: You don’t necessarily need to play great to win; many times, “avoiding mediocrity or ineptitude” is enough of a standard to win a game. It doesn’t sound sexy or inspiring, but it works.

I will provide a few statistics to back up these claims, but first, let me make one more big-picture point about the Badgers: After the first win over Nebraska in the Kohl Center last month, I made the point that Wisconsin is not going to shoot near 50 percent from 3-point range on a regular basis. UW got whatever it wanted against a bad opponent; that wasn’t reflective of where the team is going to go, or how much the Badgers might achieve this season.

Shooting 50 percent on threes isn’t a realistic goal for this team. A realistic goal was to stop shooting 28-29-30 percent from 3-point range, and to see if UW could establish a 37-38-39-percent standard. Shooting 37 percent on threes is not great, but not terrible. It’s decent. It’s okay.

Given how well Wisconsin can play defense, merely being “decent” on offense is going to win a lot of games. If UW can carry a “decent” offense into the rest of the season, the Badgers have a real shot at the Sweet 16.

Now, then, the relevant stats from Tuesday’s win:

Wisconsin hit 38.7 percent of its threes (12 of 31).

The Badgers still aren’t a team which will generate 30 or 35 free throws per game, but on Tuesday, they did create 20 attempts and outscored Purdue 19-8 at the charity stripe. Not amazing, but not mediocre. Just being better than mediocre can go a long way.

Wisconsin placed four scorers in double figures, all with 12 or more points. Again, that’s not worth a ticker-tape parade, but see what happens when this team gets just a little bit of deep and balanced scoring? It matters.

Decent 3-point shooting. Decent free-throw output. Decent scoring balance. This wasn’t an incredible or amazing game from Wisconsin, but merely being better than average makes UW so much better. Remember that as we go forward.

Purdue head coach Matt Painter had high praise for Ohio State’s Kyle Young postgame

Purdue head coach Matt Painter had some very high praise for Ohio State forward Kyle Young in the postgame press conference.

When Purdue put the game plan together against Ohio State, it’s unlikely many believed forward Kyle Young would lead the Buckeyes in scoring.

But that’s exactly what happened during Ohio State’s 68-52 win over the Boilermakers Saturday. Young led OSU with sixteen points for the game on six of nine shooting. It wasn’t just putting the ball through the hoop though, he also seven rebounds (one on the offensive end), and an assist.

More than anything though, Young is a guy that gives all-out effort and continually does things that don’t always show up in the box score. The fact that he got a little time in the sun against Purdue was well-deserved.

Purdue head coach Matt Painter was asked about Young after the game, and he had some pretty high praise for a kid he said he watched and knew well.

“Yeah, I wish he (Young) was on our team,” Painter told reporters postgame. “He gets high praise from me. I physically went and watched him four or five times myself in two years his sophomore and junior years, so I’m a big fan of Kyle Youngs. So, he gets high praise from me, and I always tell them (his team) about guys like that that work hard.”

Painter then went to expand on those comments a little.

“He’s just active,” Painter said. “He’s a hard-nosed, tough dude, and he’s about winning.”

That’s very complimentary from a guy that should know. He’s had his fair share of glue-type guys come through the Purdue program, and it’s something Painter tries to install as a part of the culture of the teams he puts together.

 

Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion.

We have a forum and message board now. Get in on the conversation about Ohio State athletics by joining the Buckeyes Wire Forum.

Badgers have a chance to string together four straight wins with consecutive home games coming up

Badgers-will-be-happy-to-welcome-Purdue-to-the-Kohl-Center-Tuesday-night

“42-16 has been talked about quite a bit the last few days,” head coach Greg Gard said to reporters Monday morning. 

The last time the Badgers faced off with the Boilermakers was when they travelled to Mackey Arena and were manhandled to the tune of 70-51. UW was outrebounded 42-16 on the glass with Brad Davison leading the team with four rebounds. Nobody else on the team surpassed two rebounds. 

The biggest message from the coaching staff has been the need to be the more physical team when Tuesday night rolls around. 

“We have to be better,” Gard said. 

The good news for the Badgers is that they will be welcoming the Boilermakers to Madison this time around. UW owns a 5-3 record against Purdue dating back to 2010 with the last two matchups inside the Kohl Center being memorable ones, while they have yet to win at Mackey Arena since 2014

The 2019 contest saw the Badgers come back from a seven point deficit in the last four minutes to force overtime but they could not hold on for the win. The matchup in 2018 saw UW pull out an emotional 57-53 win on a night where the team was honoring Badgers legend Frank Kaminsky. 

One of the more prevalent trends throughout the Big Ten is the difference in team success when on the road and when at home. The same carries over for Purdue and Wisconsin. UW owns an 11-1 record at home this season with the one loss coming by one point to Illinois. Purdue on the other hand is 3-6 on the road overall and just 2-6 in the conference when on the road. The road wins for the Boilermakers have come against Indiana, Northwestern and Ohio. Indiana and Northwestern are 12th and last in the conference, respectively, while Ohio is winless against teams in power five conferences. 

The date with Purdue kicks off a pair of home games for Wisconsin. The Badgers host Rutgers this Sunday at noon as well. The consecutive home games will be the first time UW plays consecutive home games since they had four straight home games back in November.

“That’s crazy. That we haven’t had two straight home games. It is what it is,” Gard said. 

Gard’s message to the team has been that it’s “not the venue that determines our success. It’s not the location. It’s our play.”

That’s a fair message but there is no denying the players seem to have more juice at home, much like teams across the Big Ten, and they will be happy to be playing in the Kohl Center come Tuesday night.

Against Purdue, Wisconsin can reach a Big Ten milestone this season

More on Wisconsin vs. Purdue

No, a ticker-tape parade won’t be thrown for the Wisconsin Badgers if they manage to defeat the Purdue Boilermakers on Tuesday night in the Kohl Center. However, if you have been paying very close attention to Wisconsin hoops this season, you know this game is very important for one simple reason: Believe it or not, Wisconsin could register its first three-game conference winning streak of the season with a win over Purdue.

Surprised? You shouldn’t be.

This has been the way of the Big Ten this season — not just the home-road splits, but teams fluctuating wildly between their A game and their F game. The Purdue team Wisconsin will face on Tuesday is a perfect embodiment of this pattern. Iowa has exhibited the pattern. Indiana has. Rutgers doesn’t know how to tie its shoelaces away from The RAC in Piscataway, New Jersey. Wisconsin has certainly been part of the Big Ten’s very unpredictable, motion-sickness-inducing basketball campaign.

Go look it up if you’re not sure. Wisconsin split its December Big Ten games. The Badgers won at Ohio State in early January and lost to Illinois. They beat Penn State and Maryland and were on the verge of a three-game winning streak in the league, but they then lost to Michigan State. They stumbled around in late January, losing three of four games, but have since rebounded to beat Ohio State and Nebraska. Here we go, then: Wisconsin can finally stitch together three Big Ten wins in a row on the day after Presidents Day. It has been a long and winding road, but the Badgers have entered a favorable portion of their schedule and are in position to make good use of it.

If they CAN, it speaks well of the team’s ability not only to improve as the season has moved along, but to have survived the rougher patches in the schedule in January, without completely collapsing.

If the Badgers CAN’T beat Purdue — which would mean a season sweep at the hands of the Boilermakers — dreams of a double bye at the Big Ten Tournament would not necessarily be shattered, but they would become a lot less realistic.

Wisconsin has had a hard time handling prosperity this season. UW has been great when its back has been against the wall, but terrible when coming off a decisive victory. If the Badgers can string together good performances, their habits and tendencies might improve in the right direction… at the best possible time of year.

Purdue embodies Big Ten inconsistency and volatility in 2020

Purdue offers a recognizable story

Fans of the Wisconsin Badgers do not need an explanation or recounting of how volatile and inconsistent their basketball team has been in this weird, wacky 2020 Big Ten season. The Purdue Boilermakers, who visit the Kohl Center on Tuesday night in the second game of the season series with Wisconsin, have been even more volatile than the Badgers this season… which is saying something.

It is a dynamic which keeps emerging in the Big Ten this season, with Iowa, Indiana and Illinois also exhibiting the same characteristics, and Rutgers being the ultimate home-versus-road example of a Jekyll-and-Hyde team: Big Ten teams often have a large gulf between their best and worst selves. Teams in the conference this year frequently play really well or really poorly, with nothing in between. Pendulum swings from excellence to ineptitude have been frequent this season, and they emerged this past weekend: Indiana — after beating Iowa at home — no-showed on the road at Michigan. Illinois had nothing to offer at Rutgers.

Purdue bombed at Ohio State, losing 68-52.

Purdue — like several other Big Ten teams — pinballs from an A-plus level of form to a D-minus or F, and rarely plays at a boring but steady B-minus level which offers stability and predictability.

Check out Purdue in Big Ten play this season, casting aside non-conference games. The Boilermakers have had these margins of victory in their Big Ten games to this point in the season:

Plus-14 (Northwestern)

Minus-14 (Nebraska)

Plus-5 (Minnesota)

Minus-26 (Illinois)

Minus-6 (Michigan)

Plus-29 (Michigan State)

Minus-7 (Maryland)

Minus-17 (Illinois)

Plus-19 (Wisconsin)

Minus-7 (Rutgers)

Plus-3 (Northwestern)

Plus-36 (Iowa)

Plus-12 (Indiana)

Minus-12 (Penn State)

Minus-16 (Ohio State)

For those of you keeping score at home, that’s 15 Big Ten games, with 10 being decided by 12 points or more, only three games decided by two possessions (6 points or fewer), and only ONE game decided by one possession (3 points or fewer).

Purdue has lost twice to Illinois by a combined total of 43 points, and yet the Boilermakers beat both Michigan State and (in non-conference play) Virginia by 29 points apiece!

This team is nuts! Instructively, a good portion of the Big Ten has been the same in 2020. What a wild year.

Wisconsin faces a challenge of honor and pride vs Purdue

Wisconsin hosts Purdue

Rebounding is a conditional statistic. What I mean to say is that rebounding isn’t an inherently valuable statistic; its value depends on other circumstances. A team can have far fewer offensive rebounds than its opponent… and that can be a very good thing. Why? It didn’t miss many shots. The opponent, on the other hand, missed a lot of shots. Rebounds become more important to the extent that they are more available in a game. If a team is shooting 55 percent from the field, its need to chase down rebounds isn’t as central to a game’s outcome. It doesn’t cease to be relevant, but its level of relevance decreases.

On Friday, January 24, Purdue did not shoot especially well against Wisconsin. The Boilermakers hit 45 percent of their field goals. They made a modest seven free throws, so it is not as though they set up a buffet table at the foul line. Purdue needed more possessions on that night, given the way it was shooting the ball.

The Boilermakers got more possessions. Boy, did they ever.

Purdue earned 60 field goal attempts whereas Wisconsin managed only 46. If a mediocre shooting team can create 14 more field goal attempts than its opponent, and the free throws are basically even (9-8 for Purdue that night) while turnovers are dead even (11 turnovers for both teams on that Friday in Mackey Arena), that mediocre shooting team stands an excellent chance of winning. It might even win comfortably.

Final score: Purdue 70, Wisconsin 51.

The Boilermakers won the rebounding battle, 42 to 16. They won on the offensive glass, 16-2. It was a bloodbath.

Do we need to ask what Wisconsin needs to do above all else in the rematch on Tuesday night in the Kohl Center?

I don’t think so.

The nature of the challenge for Wisconsin is a central, obvious and primal one. Let’s see if the Badgers are ready to roll up their sleeves, snarl, and play with nasty, fierce intensity to respond to the bludgeoning they received from the Boilermakers a few weeks ago in West Lafayette.

Ohio State basketball vs. Purdue: How and where to watch and listen to the game

Ohio State is all set to host Purdue in a key Big Ten matchup. We’ve got all your television, streaming, and radio information right here.

It’s time to embark on another war of attrition known as Big Ten basketball. There are no easy games, and it’s no different this time around for Ohio State with the Purdue Boilermakers coming to town.

The Buckeyes has won four of the last five, but that won’t mean much if they can’t hold serve at home, where every loss gets magnified in a conference so deep. Purdue is in a similar situation as the OSU; in the tournament field for now, but ever-so-close to sliding down to bubble territory with a loss or two that must be avoided at all costs.

The Boilermaker are at .500 in the league, while Ohio State is trying to get back to that mark to continue an upward climb.

We know you’re interested and want to watch the fireworks Saturday between these two, and in case you need the broadcast information, or how to find it on the radio, we have you covered on the next page.

Next … television, radio, streaming, game time, and venue

Ohio State vs. Purdue 2019 game preview and prediction

Ohio State remains home to host Purdue in another all-important Big Ten contest. We’ve got your preview, prediction, and odds for the game.

It’s the next all-important step in Ohio State’s journey to the postseason, and yet another big matchup. That’s the way things have been in a deep and talented Big Ten. Every week is a battle, and every game has serious implications — most of the time for both teams.

Such is the case in this one. Ohio State and Purdue are both pretty solidly in the NCAA field as of right now, but a loss either team in a downward slide towards the proverbial bubble.

It’s a home affair the Buckeyes simply have to win in order to stay out of danger territory. You have to hold serve at home, and OSU has already lost a pair of games at Value City Arena this year in the Big Ten. It can ill-afford to drop another at this point.

Odds via BetMGM. Access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated Monday at 9:00 a.m. ET. 

Records

Ohio State 16-8, (6-7), Purdue 14-11, (7-7)

All-time series record

68-54 Ohio State leads

Last meeting

Purdue won 86-51 last season in West Lafayette on March 2

Broadcast, TV, Game Time

Date: Saturday, February 15
Game Time: Noon
Venue: Value City Arena, Columbus, OH
Network: FOX

Next … The Ohio State Game Plan