The Cincinnati Bengals need more from WR John Ross.
In what shouldn’t be a surprise at all, the Cincinnati Bengals didn’t trade wide receiver John Ross in the leadup to Tuesday’s trade deadline.
Ross, sitting on a declined fifth-year option, has eyes for free agency after this season in the wake of asking the team for a trade. He’s been inactive for most of this season and had an “illness” holding him out of practices at points.
Yet realistically, the Bengals should probably get him on the field more.
Admittedly, this is the second coaching staff that has worked with Ross — whether it’s on his skill set, through the injuries and on the mental side of the game — and ultimately said no thanks.
And admittedly, this Zac Taylor-led staff is more than open to any guys playing at any spots. They’ve thrown draft status out the window and mostly put the best guys on the field, so it’s not like Ross hasn’t had his chance.
But we’ve seen glimpses of what Ross can do. That 2018 usage in the redzone where he scored seven times was intriguing. And his blowing past the 500-yard mark last season while averaging 18.1 yards per catch was impressive.
In short, it’s hard not to think of plays like this:
It says quite a bit that coaches don’t seem to want Ross on the field in some capacity. But considering even A.J. Green was having a hard time getting going in a new offense with a new quarterback, maybe Ross just needs longer than anticipated.
Which means it’s important to bring up the subject of special teams. Coaches have surely thought of this too and maybe it has already massively failed. But getting the ball in Ross’ hands as a returner could provide more productivity.
Fourth and fifth options in the base offense like Mike Thomas have shown some sparks too, but remain known commodities. Getting a few Ross-specific gadget plays in there on something like end-arounds, if nothing else, could further diversify the offense.
Is any sort of usage enough to repair the relationship and get Ross — who asked for a trade — to want to stick around long-term? Maybe not, but a 2-5-1 rebuilding season is a ripe for experimentation with an eye on the long-term.
[listicle id=38933]
[listicle id=38902]