Is the Jerami Grant trade to Nuggets one Thunder won’t end up winning?

The Nuggets have gotten excellent play from Jerami Grant, a player the Thunder traded away for a first round draft pick.

For as long as we’ve known Sam Presti, he’s been one of the NBA’s more celebrated general managers. Since drafting Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and James Harden in consecutive drafts, the Thunder have mostly been contending in the Western Conference.

Aside from the obvious, on Presti’s watch, the Thunder have made some pretty good trades and have found value late in many drafts. The latest examples of which are the 2018 trade that saw the team send Carmelo Anthony to Atlanta in the deal that yielded Dennis Schroder.

Meanwhile, Reggie Jackson, Steven Adams and Terrannce Ferguson are examples of the team finding value in the draft.

For Presti, those names are just the tip of the iceberg — his resume is chock full of great acquisitions. For that reason, it makes perfect sense that the Thunder would place a higher value on netting draft picks in return for its veteran contributors.

Much has been said of the two trades last offseason that saw Russell Westbrook head to Houston and Paul George get dealt to the Clippers.

Much less has been said about the team sending Jerami Grant to the Denver Nuggets. Based on what we’ve seen from Grant, it could be a rare occasion in which Presti ends up on the losing side of a deal.

Now in his sixth season, at just 26 years old, Grant has grown appreciably as a pro. He’s become a major contributor for a Denver Nuggets team that is battling the Lakers for the opportunity to advance to the 2020 NBA Finals and has proven to be effective on both sides of the ball.

Interestingly enough, the Thunder originally acquired Grant from the Philadelphia 76ers in a package partially consisting of a first round pick that conveys this year. When sending him out to the Nuggets last offseason, the Thunder received a first-round pick in exchange. It also conveys this year.

In the end, the Thunder traded was became the 21st pick in the draft for Grant and received the 25th pick in the same draft when he was traded away.

Over the years, the Thunder have found value late in the draft, but with every impactful play Grant has made in the 2020 NBA Playoffs — and every contribution he makes moving forward — one can fairly wonder whether Oklahoma City will be able to find a better prospect in the latter stages of the first round of a draft that many consider fairly weak.

As the starting power forward for the Thunder last season, Grant averaged 13.6 points, 5.2 rebounds and 1.3 block per game in 32.7 minutes. On a per-game basis, his numbers dipped for the Nuggets, but he played less minutes per game and came off the bench, so the reduction was easy to understand.

If nothing else, Grant’s productivity and continued growth — again, he’s just 26 years old — underscores an important lesson that teams including the Philadelphia 76ers have learned. Having draft picks is one thing, utilizing them wisely is another.

With Chris Paul, Dennis Schroder and Steven Adams among those many believe the Thunder will trade away, and with Danilo Gallinari and Andre Roberson set to hit free agency, one can fairly look at Jerami Grant, his contributions to the Nuggets and wonder whether the team would have been better off keeping him and allowing him to continue to develop in Oklahoma City.

Deep down inside, Presti probably feels some additional pressure to make wise use of the 25th pick in this year’s draft, and based on what Grant has become, it’d be easy to understand why.

Pick traded for Jerami Grant in 2016 ends up being 21st in 2020 Draft

The NBA broke ties impacting the order of some picks in the 2020 draft. We can finally grade the Jerami Grant trade.

Over the past few days, there’s been a lot of discussion surrounding the Thunder’s 2020 first round draft pick.

On Monday, its fate was finally determined, once and for all.

Back in 2016, the Thunder traded its 2020 first round draft pick to the Philadelphia 76ers in the trade that saw Jerami Grant land in Oklahoma City, but the pick was traded with top-20 protection. In other words, the pick was traded to the Sixers on the condition that if it ended up being one of the draft’s top 20 picks, it would revert to the Thunder. In such an instance, the Thunder would instead trade its second round picks to the Sixers in 2022 and 2023.

Finally, we know for sure how this story ends, as the Thunder’s 2020 first round pick landed at 21st overall, so it’s heading to Philly.

With Mike Muscala’s buzzer-beating shot against the Heat, the Thunder clinched a regular season record that guaranteed the pick was fall outside of the top 20. Since then, we’ve known that the pick was destined to land in Philadelphia but it wasn’t until Monday that we knew exactly where the pick landed.

The reason for the lack of clarity was because the Thunder ended the regular season with the same record as the Houston Rockets and Utah Jazz; all three teams ended the season at 44-28.

In the event teams finish the regular season with the same record, in order to determine draft order for playoff teams (or, with respect to lottery teams, their lottery odds), the NBA conducts a simple coin flip. On Monday, those results were announced. The Thunder won its coin flip over both the Rockets and Jazz.

In the end, what that means is that the Thunder’s first round draft pick landed at No. 21. As a result, as we’ve stated, it will be transferred to the Philadelphia 76ers.

Coincidentally, the Thunder will own the 25th pick, as they received the pick from Denver in exchange for Jerami Grant, who Sam Presti dealt last summer.

Looking at the two trades together, one could conclude that the only essentially moved back four spots in the draft (which isn’t so bad), but had the team lost one more game this past season, they would have had two first round picks this year — Denver’s pick plus its own pick. In that scenario, though, they would have had to give the Sixers two second round picks later on.

It’s all water under the bridge now, but it’s certainly an interesting “What if?” to keep in mind as the 2020 NBA Draft approaches.

Nuggets’ Jerami Grant keeps focus on Breonna Taylor when questioned by reporters

Grant spoke with the media on Wednesday.

The police shooting of Breonna Taylor continues to be be protested and focused on around the country, including with athletes like Houston Texans wide receiver Kenny Stills calling for the police officers involved to be charged.

Denver Nuggets forward Jerami Grant is doing his part to keep up the conversation and focus on Taylor and her case. When he met with reporters virtually on Wednesday, he answered every question — whether it was about his team or life in the NBA bubble — by talking about Taylor and police brutality.

Here’s a look at some of his answers, and below it is a transcript of what he said:

[jwplayer AYXSLoUW-q2aasYxh]

 

 

Joel Embiid ranks second on Bleacher Report’s top 15 centers list

Sixers star Joel Embiid has been one of the top centers in the league the past two seasons.

Philadelphia 76ers center Joel Embiid probably has the most to prove of any All-Star in the Orlando bubble.

It’s not about the lack of rings, but more so the absence of a long playoff run. In two playoff appearances, Embiid has not gone past the second round. Still, he is recognized by many as one of the best at his position.

Bleacher Report’s Andy Bailey and Dan Favale released their top 15 centers Friday, and Embiid slotted in at No. 2, right behind Denver Nuggets star Nikola Jokic. The debate between Embiid and Jokic isn’t new, with Jokic being more dynamic on offense and Embiid being a better defender.

This season, Embiid has continued to dominate in the low post. At the beginning of the video above, he squared up to the basket well and created space to score against Boston Celtics big man Daniel Theis. According to NBA.com stats, Embiid has led the league in points on post-ups (7.4) this season.

Along with his low-post dominance, Embiid has maintained his reputation for being a good interior defender. He has posted a defensive rating of 101.4 this season, and he has averaged 1.3 blocks a game.

As a playmaking center, Jokic is the better passer. Both players can score at about the same level, and neither is significantly better than the other at rebounding.

With Embiid and Jokic being the focal points of their respective offenses, it  comes down to personal preference in choosing who is better.

Jokic is the hub, but the Nuggets are nearly a by-committee offense, with Will Barton, Jamal Murray, Paul Millsap, Jerami Grant and Gary Harris all being viable scoring options.

The Sixers’ offense isn’t as efficient because of their lack of quality spacing. It feeds more on Embiid’s success, and if Embiid doesn’t play well, the rest of the team generally falters.

The Sixers will play their first seeding game Aug. 1 against the Indiana Pacers, with tipoff set for 7 p.m. ET.

[lawrence-related id=34428,34417,34393,34374]

Jerami Grant: Leadership of Russell Westbrook reminiscent of Jordan

“He always lit a fire under me,” Jerami Grant said of Russell Westbrook. “That’s why he’s my brother. Me and Russ are extremely close.”

Denver Nuggets forward Jerami Grant, who was teammates with current Houston Rockets star Russell Westbrook for three seasons in Oklahoma City, says his former teammate’s leadership and guidance reminds him of legendary Basketball Hall of Famer Michael Jordan.

Jordan is back in the news given ESPN’s recent “The Last Dance” documentary on the 1990s Chicago Bulls, and the 26-year-old Grant was asked on a podcast by Chris Haynes of Yahoo Sports whether he had played with anyone who had a leadership style similar to Jordan.

Grant, who has played for three different teams, responded:

For sure, Russell Westbrook. He always lit a fire under me.

I was very timid. My confidence was wishy washy. I had just gotten traded, and he would pass me the ball, and I wouldn’t shoot it sometimes. I’d be hesitant. He always screamed at me, ‘Shoot the effing ball!’ For me, that’s why he’s my brother. Me and Russ are extremely close. He definitely sees potential in me, and he felt like I could help the team win. For him to do stuff like that, I love it. He’s just trying to help me. Russ definitely has that mentality.

Grant clarified that Westbrook’s leadership style wasn’t as “spiteful” as what was seen at times by Jordan on the documentary. He explains:

I didn’t take it personally. I think Jordan was a little different. Jordan was a little more aggressive. From watching the documentary, it was a little more spiteful. Russ was more constructive criticism. It was a tough-love type thing. If he really felt like you had the potential, he was going to push you in his way. I never really took to it in the wrong way, because I knew that it helped me to move forward.

Grant is averaging 11.6 points (40.0% on 3-pointers) and 3.5 rebounds in 26.2 minutes per game this season for the Nuggets (43-22), who could loom as a playoff opponent for Westbrook’s Rockets (40-24).

There’s also a potential storyline to watch in the subsequent offseason. Grant has a player option on his current contract to enter 2020 free agency, and Rockets GM Daryl Morey has said he hopes to “add a significant player” by potentially using the full Mid-Level Exception (MLE).

[lawrence-related id=28522]

If that’s the case, there might be a path for Grant and Westbrook to potentially reunite in Houston, depending on his market.

Now 31 years old, Westbrook is a nine-time NBA All-Star and the league’s 2016-17 MVP. He’s averaging 27.5 points on a career-high 47.4% shooting clip in his first season with the Rockets, along with 8.0 rebounds, 7.0 assists, and 1.7 steals per game.

[lawrence-related id=30119,29550]

NBA free agency: Who should (and should not) opt out this offseason?

The lack of cap space will likely result in a smaller percentage of players with player options opting out of their deals.

In the 2019 offseason, half the league had significant cap space, with most teams having maximum space available. The abundance of cap room convinced 11 of 18 players with player options to opt out and test the market. With more than $600 million available to be spent, no player who opted out of their deals got left behind. 2020 pales in comparison, projecting with just over $200 million in cap space to offer with a whopping 29 players with pending player options who will need to make decisions by June 30.

It is really hard to envision most of these players earning a pay raise or even equal to what they currently earn if they become free agents this summer. Most teams operating over the cap will be spending their money working around the margins, and cap space teams could do the same or take in bad contracts with draft picks attached. The lack of cap room will likely result in a smaller percentage of players with player options hitting the market.

GOOD CASES FOR OPTING OUT

Anthony Davis ($28.8 million) is going to decline his 2020-21 player option for sure. He formally declined the Lakers’ maximum extension offer, but that is because he would have left a lot of money on the table doing so. Barring an unexpected change in circumstances, expect Davis to re-sign with the Lakers for maximum dollars on either a one or two-year deal with a player option at the end. This process allows him to maximize his earnings over the next seven years.

Gordon Hayward ($34.19 million) has a very interesting case for opting out because he seems to have finally come back to form since breaking his leg in 2017. His efficiency and most of his numbers (except scoring) are higher than his 2016-17 numbers despite having a lower usage. He had a strong case for making the All-Star game this year if not for missing 13 games with a broken hand.

The Celtics rely on Hayward as part of their wing-centric lineup but they may have suitors to fend off. Charlotte, who previously signed him to an offer sheet in 2014, is projected with $26.7 million in cap space. Miami, who is projected with $26.5 million in cap space, also pursued Hayward in 2017, although indications are that they want to keep the keg dry for 2021. Other teams with at least that much cap space include Atlanta, Detroit, and New York. It seems unlikely that Hayward would want to leave Boston, and none of these teams other than New York can offer Hayward a true maximum contract (projected $40.3 million starting salary). If Hayward opts out, expect him to re-sign with the Celtics on a long-term deal. He is still getting minor injuries every now and then, so it would be wise to get the security given his history.

Jerami Grant ($9.4 million) is very likely, if not a lock, to secure a significant raise if he opts out. His skillset has a place on any modern NBA team and a player such as him could be one of the most sought after this offseason. Denver will not be able to replace him easily with the lack of players like him on the market, nor with just the non-taxpayer mid-level exception (NT-MLE). They’re already invested in him having traded a first-round pick for him and don’t exactly have an up and coming young power forward to take his place. Grant having full Bird rights with a team who can’t easily replace him and multiple suitors in free agency should lead to a lucrative long-term contract.

Evan Fournier ($17.2 million) could also see a nice raise or at least an incremental one. There should be suitors for him despite the dry market. His playmaking and scoring ability gives him a rotation spot on just about every team with or without cap space. He should be considered an extension candidate ahead of free agency as he currently can extend with the Magic for up to a maximum of $92.2 million between 2020-21 and 2023-24. If he opts out and is not offered long-term security, he could probably still earn more than $17.2 million on a one-year deal. Whether he opts out or not, he’s in an excellent position heading into the offseason because of his options.

Kentavious Caldwell-Pope ($8.5 million) and Avery Bradley ($5 million) are having resurgences under Lakers head coach Frank Vogel. Assuming the Lakers re-sign Davis, they will be over the cap and replacing them will be difficult if they leave. Caldwell-Pope finally has full Bird rights with the Lakers, so unless they can replace him with just the NT-MLE, he has a lot of leverage to secure a higher salary, although for now they’re likely only offering a one-year deal in preparation for 2021. Bradley could get a very small raise for up to his non-Bird amount ($5.7 million) or can get more via the NT-MLE. Whether their success is just a product of Vogel’s system or not, many over-the-cap teams with the NT-MLE could be preparing offers in hopes of stealing them from the Lakers.

COMPLICATED CASES FOR OPTING OUT, SHOULD CONSIDER AN EXTENSION IF ELIGIBLE

Mike Conley ($34.5 million) is in his age-32 season and may have started to show signs of a decline, although his February numbers are much closer to his career norms. Even if he plays at a level closer to that in Memphis, it makes very little sense for him to opt out because most of the 2020 cap space teams already have a starting point guard. Miami could make sense, but they’d likely only offer a one-year deal. The maximum amount he is eligible to extend for is $174.8 million over four years, but realistically he is looking at at least half that total. Utah is heavily invested in Conley after trading two first-round picks for him, but whether or not he fits in with them is still a work in progress. Conley will most likely opt in, but his long-term future in Utah is in question.

Andre Drummond ($28.6 million) is soon facing a very harsh and frustrating reality. In the past few offseasons, centers have been getting smaller and smaller guaranteed deals. In 2018, a considerably low cap-space offseason, we saw non-stretch centers Clint Capela and Jusuf Nurkic earn $16 million and $12 million annually, respectively. Charlotte and New York are the only two teams with significant cap space who make some sense for Drummond, but it’s hard to see either team shelling most of their cap space just to him. If Drummond were to opt-out and test the market, he might end up getting offered similar figures as Capela and Nurkic did. That is a steep paycut overnight, and because he was traded in February he is not extension eligible for the rest of the season. If he were to opt-out, it probably won’t be without assurances of a lucrative deal via a cap space team or a sign-and-trade. Otherwise, expect him to opt-in.

DeMar DeRozan’s ($27.7 million) next contract should be a lucrative one, but it is difficult envisioning a 2020 cap space team that makes sense for him. He could be a sign-and-trade candidate if he opts out and if there is a return that interests San Antonio. He has discussed an extension with the Spurs, but according to Sam Amick of The Athletic, they are far apart on an agreement. If he’s hoping for the maximum $149.1 million he is eligible for, he may not even get that from a team he’s potentially traded to. He has options, but unless he signs a lucrative extension, his best option is to opt-in and test the market in 2021.

INDIFFERENT BUT SHOULD AT LEAST RECOUP DECLINED MONEY

Enes Kanter, Robin Lopez, and JaMychal Green ($5 million) signed for the $4.8 million room mid-level exception (R-MLE). That became the price tag for other backup big men such as Richaun Holmes, Frank Kaminsky, and Mike Scott. JaVale McGee ($4.2 million) is also earning a similar amount. Most likely that $5 million range will remain the price for backup big men, so if any of these players opt-out, they should have the R-MLE amount to fall back on.

Austin Rivers ($2.4 million), Willie Cauley-Stein ($2.3 million), Wesley Matthews ($2.7 million), Mike Muscala ($2.3 million), and James Ennis ($2.1 million) all signed for the veteran minimum or slightly above it. It is tough to gauge whether they’ve done enough this season to garner a raise, but at the very least they should have a minimum offer available next season. If any of these players opt out, it could be for a change of scenery.

BAD CASE FOR OPTING OUT

Otto Porter ($28.5 million) had an unbelievable stretch during the 2018-19 season that made opting out in 2020 a reasonable possibility. However, injuries have severely limited him over the past two years, making him very unlikely to hit free agency. Rodney Hood ($6 million) was making a strong case too, but his Achilles injury will certainly have him opting in.

Tim Hardaway Jr. ($19 million) and Kelly Olynyk ($13.2 million) have been productive role players and are likely looking at paycuts down the line. Meanwhile, Jabari Parker ($6.5 million) and Stanley Johnson ($3.8 million), have not been as productive and are probably leaving money on the table if they opt out. All these players might as well opt in and try to boost their stock for 2021.

Nicolas Batum ($27.1 million), James Johnson ($16.1 million), and Tony Snell ($12.2 million), the last of the remaining ‘sour sixteens’ (or ‘seventeens’ in Snell’s case), can thank the cap spike of 2016 for their fortune. No cap smoothing led to a surplus in cap space, and one of the unintended consequences was allocating large portions of it to non-qualified players. Expect these players to opt in.

Despite only earning minimum salaries, there is no guarantee that Rajon Rondo ($2.6 million) and Mario Hezonja ($2 million) would be signed next season. They should only opt out if they have assurances of a minimum deal from at least one team.

Jerami Grant reverses course, the Thunder no longer a ‘sinking ship’

Grant made his return to OKC for the first time since being traded in July to the Denver Nuggets for a 2020 first-round draft pick.

Remember that time that Jerami Grant called the Thunder a sinking ship?

Fans in Oklahoma City may remember the comments the former Thunder forward made over the summer after he was traded to the Denver Nuggets for a 2020 first-round draft pick.

But more than likely, they chose not to care as they welcomed Grant back into Chesapeake Energy Arena with a warm ovation on Friday night.

Grant didn’t play his best game against his former team, coming off the bench to score just six points in 21 minutes on 1-of-6 shooting from the field in Oklahoma City’s 113-101 win.

After the game, Grant was asked about what is different about this Thunder team than the one he was a part of last year, and told Maddie Lee of The Oklahoman that it’s “everything”.

“I mean, everything. I mean, there’s only a few players there that I played with.”

Grant also seemed to have a reversal of opinion when asked by reporters what it is that makes Oklahoma City special this season.

“I mean, they’re talented. They’re a completely different team, they’ve got a lot of pieces.”

Of the experience, Grant said that he loved being back in Oklahoma City and that he has “a bunch of great memories” from his three seasons with the Thunder.

In September, Grant had told Harrison Wind of DNVR Sports that it wasn’t difficult to leave OKC because the Thunder had “some things going on”.

“I don’t think it was too difficult. There were some things going on in Oklahoma and they kind of got rid of a lot of different piece. For me it was almost good to get out of a sinking ship.”

He’ll get to face his former team two more times this season. The Nuggets will make the trip back to Oklahoma City on Friday, March 20, followed by the Thunder heading to play in Denver on Monday, March 30.

A look at the Thunder’s quality 3-point shooting to begin the season

The Thunder are ranked seventh in the league for 3-point percentage to begin this season.

[jwplayer yqduqGwD-z6KDnl0B]

It may have taken starting a rebuild for the Oklahoma City Thunder to be a good 3-point shooting team.

And yet with the Thunder at 4-6 to start the season, they’re one of the best shooting teams in the NBA.

The Thunder made a season-high 17 3-pointers in their 121-119 loss Sunday night against the Milwaukee Bucks. Mike Muscala and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander each had a team-high four 3-pointers, and Chris Paul and Dennis Schroder each had three.

Through 10 games this season, the Thunder rank seventh in the league for 3-point percentage, shooting at a 37.5% clip. As a team, the Thunder make 11.5 3-pointers a game, and five players account for a good portion of those makes.

Paul, Gilgeous-Alexander, Terrance Ferguson, Danilo Gallinari and Darius Bazley combine for 8.7 of the Thunder’s 3-pointers per game. Each player has shot at least 38% from 3-point range.

Despite being two games under .500, the Thunder’s quality shooting has helped them remain competitive.

They’ve only shot below 36% from the 3-point line in two games. Both of those were losses, and in both games, they lost by 12 or fewer points. In games where they have shot 36% or better from deep, they’re 4-4. In each of the four losses, the Thunder have lost by single digits.

Having new players such as Paul, Gallinari and Gilgeous-Alexander has helped the Thunder improve their shooting.

Paul and Gallinari have both shot at least 37% from 3-point range in their careers. A rookie last season, Gilgeous-Alexander shot 36.7% with the Los Angeles Clippers.

Ferguson has also improved his shooting steadily over his career. He’s shooting 38.1% from three on 2.1 attempts. Bazley, a rookie, has shot 40.0% on 2.5 attempts. He ranks seventh among rookies for 3-point percentage, according to NBA.com.

In the past three seasons, the Thunder have been in the bottom half of the league for 3-point percentage. The last time they were in the top half was in the 2013-14 season, when they ranked 14th.

Their top two shooters last season were Jerami Grant and Paul George, but both players were traded this offseason to the Denver Nuggets and Los Angeles Clippers, respectively. Ferguson was the team’s third-best 3-point shooter last season, hitting at a 36.6% clip.

The Thunder are rebuilding, but they have a budding young player in Gilgeous-Alexander. Paul and Gallinari are proven talents, so their leadership helps. Though the Thunder might not make the playoffs, their shooting ability gives them a chance to compete against most teams.

OKC will play the Indiana Pacers at Bankers Life Fieldhouse on Tuesday night.

[lawrence-related id=427223,427137,427229,427218]