Safety is big need for Packers but only a few standouts at NFL Scouting Combine

The safety position didn’t test particularly well at the NFL Scouting Combine, but the Packers have a big need there.

The safety position is without question one of the biggest needs that the Green Bay Packers have to address this offseason. However, in terms of high-end talent, this is a thin position group compared to others like edge rusher, tight end, and cornerback, not to mention that, as a whole, very few from the safety position stood out at the NFL Combine.

During Brian Gutekunst’s tenure as GM, there has been a strong connection between his draft picks and how they score on Kent Lee Plattee’s Relative Athletic Score scale that ranges from 0-10. For more on the inner workings of RAS, click here, but in short, 30 of Gutey’s 42 RAS-eligible draft picks have scored 8.0 or higher, with 18 of those 30 in the nine-plus range. On the flip side, only eight have scored below 7.0.

Of 26 safeties at the combine who have enough data to be given a Relative Athletic Score, only eight scored about 8.0. I guess the good news is that of those eight, seven were above 9.0, but there were also 15 prospects who scored worse than 7.0.

If Gutey’s draft history with RAS holds, there may have been a number of players crossed off Green Bay’s draft board on Friday.

Now, I always want to add the caveat that RAS is just one piece of the puzzle – it’s not the be-all-end-all. But with that said, it’s not as if there were many early-round options at safety for the Packers to begin with, either. 

On Daniel Jeremiah’s big board, only two safeties made the top 50: Brian Branch, who posted a RAS of 6.38, and Ji’Ayir Brown, who scored 3.68. Antonio Johnson is another name some have in their top 50 big boards, but he scored a 6.67 – all three well below what the Packers typically covet. Of the 10 safeties that PFF projects to go somewhat early on in the draft, only Sydney Brown, projected to go on Day 2, and Jartavius Martin, projected by PFF to go early on Day 3, were on the list of eight players to score above 8.0 on the RAS scale.

So with safety being as big of a need as it is for the Packers with Darnell Savage, who was benched at one point in 2022 and may be better served in the slot rather than playing deep, being the only player on the roster with any experience, along with their potentially being limited options early on in the draft, perhaps free agency is how Green Bay should go about addressing this need.

This is a fairly deep free-agent class at safety, with 14 players making PFF’s top 100. Green Bay likely won’t have a ton of cap space to be spent, but they’ll have viable options. The addition of a safety in free agency also shouldn’t stop the Packers from adding to this position in the draft either–they should do both.

Another potential solution at safety could be moving Rasul Douglas inside, which is something that Gutekunst discussed this past week while at the combine.

“(Douglas) has such good eyes and instincts when he’s back there and seeing the whole field,” Gutekunst said at the NFL Combine via Packers.com. “Anytime you move a guy inside, whether it’s the nickel or the safety, and you have both sides you really have to worry about, there’s a curve there that’s going to take some time to really understand that. But his skill set as far as his eyes, his ability to go get the ball, his angles, his instincts, and he’s a pretty good tackler, too, he could make that transition if that’s what we decided to do.”

Doing this, however, then creates a bigger need at cornerback, although that is arguably the strongest position to draft from in this year’s class, with seven players making Jeremiah’s top 50. 

Free agency begins on March 15th, with the legal tampering period starting two days prior to that. Green Bay currently has $17.5 million in available cap space, according to Over the Cap, and another handful of contract restructure candidates to give them more room.

[lawrence-related id=90806,90791,90785,90782]

2023 NFL Scouting Combine: The Packers and Relative Athletic Score

The Packers have tended to draft elite athletes under Brian Gutekunst, and nothing tells the story of athleticism quite like Relative Athletic Score.

With the 2023 NFL Scouting Combine set to begin on February 28th, it’s time to get reacquainted with Relative Athletic Score (RAS), which has had a strong connection to a majority of the Green Bay Packers draft picks during Brian Gutekunst’s tenure as GM.

RAS was developed by Kent Lee Platte as a way to take all of the height, weight, and athletic measurements that come from the combine or a prospect’s Pro Day and convert it into one digestible and easily comparable number. To read more about the inner workings of the RAS calculation, click here.

In short, based on how a player measures and tests athletically, they fall somewhere on the RAS scale, which takes into account historical results as well, not only the testing numbers from the current draft class. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with five being average and eight or higher considered elite and within the top 20 percentile of a position group. The higher the score, the better the athlete. This rating is also relative to the prospect’s position group, so even though an offensive lineman and a cornerback will test very differently, both could end up scoring a 9.5, for example, if they are elite athletes at their respective positions.

Now, by no means do I believe that Gutekunst and the Packers’ scouting department are scrolling through Kent’s site looking at RAS scores, but there has been a strong connection over the years between Gutekunt’s draft picks and prospects who score really well on the RAS scale. I imagine the Packers have their own system for quantifying this data, but to a degree, it does align with Kent’s RAS table. So from the outside looking in, RAS perhaps gives us some insight into who the Packers may or may not be targeting in the draft.

Since 2018 when Gutekunst took over as GM, he has made 48 draft picks, and 42 of them have registered a RAS score. Of the 42, 30 have scored 8.0 or higher, with 18 in the 9-plus range and 12 scoring between 8.0 and 8.99. Only eight players, however, have scored below 7.0, and six of them have been Day 3 picks. Only Amari Rodgers was a top-100 selection.

Below you can find the individual results for each of the 42 draft picks that registered a RAS score.

Quarterback
Jordan Love: 8.43

Running back
AJ Dillon: 9.15
Dexter Williams: 8.13
Kylin Hill: 7.28

Wide Receiver
Christian Watson: 9.96
Equanimeous St. Brown: 9.85
Marquez Valdes-Scantling: 9.26
J’Mon Moore: 8.43
Samori Toure: 6.14
Amari Rodgers: 5.35

Offensive Line
Zach Tom: 9.59
Elgton Jenkins: 9.33
Royce Newman: 8.72
Cole Van Lanen: 8.46
Jon Runyan: 8.47
Sean Rhyan: 8.16
Cole Madison: 4.57
Jake Hanson: 3.72

Tight End
Josiah Deguara: 8.49
Jace Sternberger: 5.17

Interior Defensive Line
James Looney: 9.75
Devonte Wyatt: 9.59
Kingsley Keke: 7.98
TJ Slaton: 7.96
Jonathan Ford: 3.54

Edge Rusher
Rashan Gary: 9.95
Kendell Donnerson: 9.89
Jonathan Garvin: 8.97
JJ Enagbare: 6.25

Linebacker
Oren Burks: 9.72
Ty Summers: 9.71
Quay Walker: 9.63
Isaiah McDuffie: 7.32

Cornerback
Jaire Alexander: 9.53
Eric Stokes: 9.37
Josh Jackson: 9.26
Ka’Dar Hollman: 9.22
Shemar Jean-Charles: 4.24

Safety
Tariq Carpenter: 8.93
Darnell Savage: 8.37

Special Teams
Hunter Bradley: 9.03
JK Scott: 8.37

Of course, just because a player tests well athletically doesn’t mean that they are destined for success in the NFL. However, it’s also worth noting that many of Gutekunst’s most successful draft picks have scored at least 8.0, with most being above 9.0.

As the combine and future Pro Days unfold, Kent will be crunching numbers and posting Relative Athletic Scores throughout the week and beyond. Take note of who scores 8.0 or higher because 76% of Gutekunst’s draft picks have done so. On the flip side, be mindful of which prospects register below a 7.0 because only 19% of Gutekunst’s past selections, and none within the first two rounds, have scored lower than that mark.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbxb1xg7g19wqdc player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=]

Athletic player comparisons for all 11 of Packers’ 2022 draft picks

Comparing each of the Packers’ 11 draft picks in 2022 to a current or former NFL player based on athletic profile.

The Green Bay Packers got bigger and faster with another athletic class of draft picks in 2022.

Based on testing numbers, size and athletic profiles, it is possible to compare the new Packers to current or former NFL players in an effort to uncover clues about how each rookie will project to the next level. We used Relative Athletic Score to help guide the process.

Keep in mind, the Packers have specific types at all positions, making comps easier. Many of the players picked compare favorably to past Packers. However, in many cases, these are absolute best-case scenarios. What fun would this exercise be if the players weren’t compared to potential best-case scenarios?

Here is an athletic player comparison for each of the Packers’ 11 draft picks:

RAS grades for the Saints’ 5-man 2022 draft class

The New Orleans Saints love athletic prospects in the NFL draft. Here are the RAS grades for each of their five draft picks, via @RossJacksonNOLA:

Every team has trends and tendencies when it comes to the NFL draft. A recent one that’s been particularly noticeable throughout recent New Orleans Saints rookie classes has been the focus on athleticism. One metric which tracks that trait has become recently popularized and has been a pretty good indication of what the Saints look for in prospects: Relative Athletic Score (RAS).

RAS is a measurement of a player’s athletic testing in relation to both size and historic results. Each grade is based on a 0-10 point scale with 8 and above being considered “Great” or “Elite”. The Saints averaged a grade of 9.02, the fourth-highest in the NFL this season, so the traits they’re looking for are reflected well in RAS, even if they aren’t using this metric specifically. Enough factors line up to where we should be paying attention to who does well by in. With that in mind, here are the RAS grades from the Saints’ five-player draft class:

RAS cards for Packers’ 11-player draft class in 2022

The Relative Athletic Scores (RAS) of each of the Packers’ 11-player draft class in 2022.

The Green Bay Packers selected another highly athletic class of draft picks in 2022.

How do we know it’s another athletic class? Relative Athletic Score (RAS).

What’s Relative Athletic Score? It’s a metric developed by Kent Lee Platte. The idea is simple: RAS measures a prospect’s athletic testing results from the combine or a pro day in relation to the prospect’s size and historical results from players at the same position. It’s a genius way of combining all the relative factors into one simple metric on a 10-point sliding scale.

Here’s a quick look through at the RAS cards for all 11 of the Packers’ draft picks in 2022:

How athletic is the Panthers’ 2022 draft class?

With help from the tireless and phenomenal work of @MathBomb, let’s take a look at how athletic the Panthers’ 2022 draft class really is.

When Matt Rhule began his tenure as Carolina Panthers head coach, he and owner David Tepper vowed to place a premium on athletic testing. And save for using his first ever draft pick on a 326-pound nose tackle who isn’t particularly athletic, he’s pretty much stuck to that approach.

This weekend was the latest testament to that, as the braintrust collected yet another crop of high-end physical specimens. So, based off Kent Lee Platte’s Relative Athletic Score (RAS) metric, let’s see how the Panthers’ 2022 draft class measures up.

50 elite athletes the Packers could target on Day 3 of the 2022 NFL draft

The Packers have picked four elite athletes during the first two days of the 2022 draft. Here are 50 elite athletes they could target on Day 3.

The Green Bay Packers selected four elite athletes during the first two days of the 2022 NFL draft. If you consider third-round pick Sean Rhyan to be a guard, then the Packers picked four players in the 93rd percentile or better for relative athleticism at their respective positions.

“Size and speed is important to us,” general manager Brian Gutekunst said Friday night.

The Packers’ work through the first three rounds follows a continuing trend under Gutekunst. The roster-builder of this team wants top athletes.

With Day 3 of the draft approaching and the Packers holding six picks between Rounds 4-7, here are 50 elite athletes (RAS over 9.0) that Gutekunst could target on Saturday:

TE Daniel Bellinger, San Diego State
DL Thomas Booker, Stanford
LB Darrian Beavers, Cincinnati
RB Pierre Strong Jr., South Dakota State
WR Bo Melton, Rutgers
OLB Jeffery Gunter, Coastal Carolina
LB Brandon Smith, Penn State
OT Kellen Diesch, Arizona State
TE Charlie Kolar, Iowa State
WR Kevin Austin Jr., Notre Dame
RB Tyler Goodson, Iowa
DL Eric Johnson, Missouri State
S Markquese Bell, Florida A&M
OLB Amare Barno, Virginia Tech
LB D’Marco Jackson, App. State
CB Zyon McCollum, Sam Houston State
OT Ryan Van Denmark, UConn
DL Matt Henningsen, Wisconsin
OT Matt Waletzko, North Dakota
S Tycen Anderson, Toledo
OL Zach Tom, Wake Forest
LB Jeremiah Moon, Florida
OL Blaise Andries, Minnesota
OLB Isaiah Thomas, Oklahoma
LB Damone Clark, LSU
CB Tariq Woolen, UTSA
S Bubba Bolden, Miami
WR Isaiah Weston, Northern Iowa
LB Micah McFadden, Indiana
TE Lucas Krull, Pittsburgh
OL Dawson Deaton, Texas Tech
CB Joshua Williams, Fayetteville State
OT Nick Zakelj, Fordham
OLB Dominique Robinson, Miami (Ohio)
LB Chance Campbell, Ole Miss
CB Josh Thompson, Texas
CB Tariq Castro-Fields, Penn State
CB Jaylen Watson, Washington State
OL Jason Poe, Mercer
S Dane Belton, Iowa
OT Cordell Volson, North Dakota State
RB Zamir White, Georgia
OL Luke Wattenberg, Washington
CB Jaylyn Armour-Davis, Alabama
LS Billy Taylor, Rutgers
WR Dareke Young, Lenoir-Rhyne
S Isaac Taylor-Stuart, USC
DL Curtis Brooks, Cincinnati
FB John Chenal, Wisconsin
LB Jack Cochrane, South Dakota
LB Baylon Spector, Clemson
CB Chase Lucas, Arizona State
WR Tanner Conner, Idaho State

[listicle id=80411]

What is the Relative Athletic Score of each Falcons draft pick?

We look at the Relative Athletic Scores for each Atlanta Falcons pick in the 2022 NFL Draft. #RAS

When it comes to the NFL draft, one thing that coaches and scouts will always be enamored with is athleticism. A fraction of a second can help a third-round prospect turn into a first-round pick, or cause a first-round talent to drop to Day Two.

As teams continue to look for ways to identify athleticism in incoming prospects, one metric that’s been on the rise in recent years is Relative Athletic Score. Created by Kent Lee Platte, RAS generates an overall score (maxing out at 10) for each player based on a combination of their testing data.

Let’s check out the RAS for each member of the Falcons’ 2022 draft class.

Packers get another elite athlete in WR Christian Watson

Packers GM Brian Gutekunst continues to add elite athletes to his roster during the draft.

No one loves elite athletes in the draft quite like Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst.

After taking two of the most athletic defensive front seven players in the 2022 NFL draft class during the first round on Thursday night, Gutekunst and the Packers traded up in the second round to get one of the most athletic wide receiver prospects ever to enter the NFL to kick off Friday.

North Dakota State receiver Christian Watson, the 34th overall pick, joined Georgia linebacker Quay Walker (No. 22) and Georgia defensive lineman Devonte Wyatt (No. 28) to form a truly elite trio of athletes that will headline the Packers’ 2022 draft class.

Relative Athletic Score is a measure created by Kent Lee Platte to measure the true athleticism of prospects in relation to size and compared to past players.

Walker, Wyatt and Watson all tested out at 9.5 out of 10 or higher, meaning all three are 95 percentile athletes or better at their respective positions.

Watson checks in in the 99th percentile for athleticism among receivers entering the NFL. He combined great size with elite explosion numbers (vertical, broad jump), elite speed (40-yard dash) and good agility. Even at 6-4, he hit 38.5″ in the vertical jump (91st percentile), covered 11-4 in the broad jump (99th percentile), finished the 40-yard dash in 4.36 seconds (97th percentile) and had a 10-yard split of 1.45 seconds (99th percentile).

Who are the best athletic comparisons for Watson? Check them out below:

Receivers as athletic as Watson usually pan out. He’ll have a chance to be very, very good. Javon Walker, the Packers’ last first-round pick at wide receiver, is actually a terrific comparison.

Watson is just an alien athlete. Here’s his spider chart at Mockdraftable:

The Packers got themselves a rare and exciting athlete with their highest pick at wide receiver since Walker in 2002.

[lawrence-related id=80479]

In Quay Walker and Devonte Wyatt, Packers continue trend of taking elite athletes in first round

Both Quay Walker and Devonte Wyatt were 95th percentile athletes for their respective positions. The Packers love elite athletes in the first round.

The Green Bay Packers broke a few tendencies during the first round of the 2022 NFL draft on Thursday night, namely taking an inside linebacker and an older prospect, but in many ways, the Packers also continued a big trend: Brian Gutekunst targeted elite athletes in the first round.

Linebacker Quay Walker and defensive lineman Devonte Wyatt both tested like top-tier athletes at their respective positions.

“Their speed and explosiveness is off the charts,” Gutekunst said following the first round.

Walker, at almost 6-4 and 241 pounds, ran the 40-yard dash in 4.52 seconds, hit 32″ in the vertical leap, covered 10-2 in the broad jump, finished the short shuttle in 4.32 seconds and the short shuttle in 6.89 seconds and completed 23 reps on the bench press. His Relative Athletic Score is 9.63 out of 10.0, meaning he’s a 96 percentile athlete among all linebackers entering the NFL.

Walker finished in the 95 percentile for height, 87th percentile for broad jump, 97th percentile for 40-yard dash, and 93rd percentile for three-cone among linebackers.

Gutekunst said Walker has impressive “sideline to sideline” ability and elite speed and range.

Wyatt, at almost 6-3 and 304 pounds, ran the 40-yard dash in 4.77 seconds, including a 1.60-second 10-yard split. He also hit 29″ in the vertical leap, covered 9-3 in the broad jump and completed the short shuttle in 4.63 seconds and three-cone drill in 7.45 seconds. His RAS is 9.56 out of 10.0.

Watt finished in the 87th percentile for broad jump, 99th percentile for the 40-yard dash and 10-yard split and 84th percentile for three-cone drill among defensive linemen.

He called Wyatt a “dynamic pass rusher” who can move in impressive ways against the run.

“His ability to scrape and get to the ball in the run game is almost linebacker-like,” Gutekunst said.

The Packers, who hadn’t drafted an inside linebacker in the first round since 2005, believe adding Walker’s length and athleticism will allow the defense to stay in more two-linebacker looks. In Walker and De’Vondre Campbell, defensive coordinator Joe Barry now has two players at the position who can run like the wind, play downhill in the run game and disrupt passing lanes.

Wyatt might be an older prospect (24 years old), but he gives the Packers defensive front another athletic penetrator to go along with Kenny Clark. He played all over the defensive front at Georgia, and his power and twitchy movement ability should give him similar versatility for Barry up front.

The Packers love taking elite athletes in the first round. In fact, all of Gutekunst’s seven first-round picks – including Walker and Wyatt – have had a Relative Athletic Score of 8.0 or higher, including five at 9.0 or higher:

Year Player School RAS
2018 Jaire Alexander Louisville 9.54
2019 Rashan Gary Michigan 9.95
2019 Darnell Savage Maryland 8.35
2020 Jordan Love Utah State 8.46
2021 Eric Stokes Georgia 9.38
2022 Quay Walker Georgia 9.63
2022 Devonte Wyatt Georgia 9.56

[listicle id=80411]