Purdue and Michigan live on the other side of the Big Ten coin

Thoughts on Purdue and Michigan

Some things have not changed in the Big Ten this basketball season. Michigan State is at the top. Nebraska and Northwestern are struggling. Maryland and Minnesota are inconsistent. Yet, many aspects of this conference are different. Rutgers and Illinois are near the top of the league. Penn State could make the NCAA Tournament. Fresh faces are moving up the ladder in the conference.

If some teams are moving up, that generally means other teams have to move down. If the rise of Rutgers and Illinois forms half of this portrait of displacement and reshuffling in Big Ten basketball, the decline of two other teams forms the other half.

Enter Purdue and Michigan.

If it feels very weird to see Illinois and Rutgers near the top of the Big Ten standings in late January, it feels equally weird to see Purdue and Michigan buried in 10th and 11th place on the morning of Wednesday, January 22. Both teams are two games under .500 in the conference, though Purdue (3-5) has played two more league games than Michigan (2-4).

How dependable have Purdue and Michigan been in recent years? The Boilermakers were a top-four seed at the Big Ten Tournament in each of the past six years. Purdue double-byes at the Big Ten tourney weren’t as regular as Wisconsin double-byes, but almost. Michigan reached each of the last three Big Ten Tournament championship games, winning two. The program lost its way in 2015 and 2016, but has been a major national factor in five of the past seven college basketball seasons, with two national title game appearances, three Elite Eights, and five Sweet 16s.

These two programs are annually expected to be in the mix as Big Ten title contenders, but right now, they aren’t. Both will need to author a significant — and rapid — turnaround if they want to have the slightest chance to make things interesting in early March. Purdue, with five conference losses, has — one could argue — already played its way out of the conversation.

If you want to understand why Rutgers and Illinois have thrived this season, one must start with an examination of how Steve Pikiell and Brad Underwood have made huge forward strides in cultivating players while making necessary self-adjustments in how they go about their business. Yet, the improvements of unlikely Big Ten contenders can’t be mentioned without noting the fall of Purdue and Michigan. We will see if the second half of the season brings renewed clarity from the Boilermakers and Wolverines.

Michigan State face-plant at Purdue sends message to Badgers

More on the Big Ten race

We said this earlier in January: There is no elite team in the Big Ten. We noted that Michigan State, though unbeaten in conference play, had played almost all of its conference games at home. Michigan State’s one road game in the league entering Sunday at Purdue was a game at Northwestern, one of the two terrible teams in the conference alongside Nebraska.

Michigan State, in other words, had not yet been challenged on the road in Big Ten play, due to its home-game-heavy schedule to start the conference season.

Guess what happened when the Spartans and Tom Izzo had to play a decent — but not even especially good — opponent on Sunday in West Lafayette? Michigan State was DEMOLISHED by Purdue, not merely beaten. The Boilermakers were 9-7 entering the game, but like the 9-7 Tennessee Titans, they looked like world-beaters against the first-place team in their conference. (Sports are funny that way.)

The Michigan State-Purdue result confirms our thesis at Badgers Wire: There is indeed no elite team in the Big Ten. Michigan State is not a Goliath looking down on everyone else. The Spartans are not a No. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament. They look a lot more like a 3 or 4 seed than a 1 or a 2 seed.

Guess what, then, Wisconsin fans? The Badgers can win the Big Ten. No, I wouldn’t BET on that, but I would certainly say that UW can make a run at the conference championship.

Yes, the loss to Illinois could really hurt the Badgers in two months, when we look at the final Big Ten standings, but Illinois is currently holding a second-place position in the Big Ten. Do you think the Illini will hold that position? If Illinois can be second now, Wisconsin can be second at a later point in time… and if Wisconsin can be second, it can make its way to first place.

Remember: The Badgers have won two Big Ten road games, and not against Nebraska or Northwestern. Wisconsin has beaten the kinds of teams Michigan State has not yet shown it can beat in the Big Ten away from East Lansing. If Wisconsin keeps winning some rock fights on the road in the conference, and Michigan State gains the same “Jekyll and Hyde” identity so many other Big Ten teams have in road games compared to home games, the Badgers will be in the thick of the hunt at the very end, in early March.

The Big Ten is wide open. Wisconsin can be part of the party. Don’t let anyone tell you this league is unwinnable for the Badgers.

10 for 20: Purdue basketball

Purdue basketball in the 2020s

One of the bigger stories in college basketball and the Big Ten in the 21st century, not just the 2010s, is the lack of high-end basketball success in the state of Indiana. The Indiana Hoosiers were a fixture in the NCAA Tournament — often its later rounds — through the early 1990s under Bob Knight. Imagine sitting on your couch in 1993 and having someone tell you that Indiana would make one Final Four in the next 26 years. You would have told that person s/he was absolutely crazy and needed to see a shrink.

Alongside Indiana’s lack of significant basketball success is another improbable story of frustration: Purdue, a program in a basketball-mad state with a rich heritage and tradition (a guy named John Wooden played there in the early 1930s), has been very consistently good but very rarely great. The Boilermakers have somehow managed to go 39 years without a Final Four and do not appear to have the kind of team which is ready to snap that streak before it reaches 40 years this upcoming April.

This past March in Louisville, Virginia’s Kihei Clark (the pass) and Mamadi Diakite (the shot) denied Purdue its first Final Four since 1980. Virginia swiped that Final Four ticket from Matt Painter’s grasp. The Cavaliers’ late play — in one of the best regional finals ever seen, right up there with 1992 Duke-Kentucky — denied Purdue’s Carsen Edwards a deserved victory lap as the hero of heroes in the history of Purdue basketball. Edwards delivered one of the all-time-great performances in NCAA Tournament history, but it didn’t lead to a Final Four.

As one considers the challenge facing Purdue in the 2020s, the surface answer is obvious: Get to the damn Final Four. The more precise detail, though, is this: Have a Plan B. What I mean by that: Purdue’s best team over the past 39 years was the 1994 team with Glenn “Big Dog” Robinson, a college basketball legend. The 2019 team relied so much on Edwards for its production and overall success. Purdue needs a “Plan B” player, a second guy who can team with a superstar to give the Boilermakers the extra measure of dynamism they need to succeed at the highest level. We will see what the 2020s bring for a program which is yearning to snap a decades-long Final Four drought.

Badgers vs. Green Bay is a perfect Wisconsin-Purdue appetizer

Reflections on Wisconsin basketball, Green Bay hoops, and the Bennett family in a week which includes a Wisconsin-Purdue football game.

Saturday, Wisconsin plays the Purdue Boilermakers in football. It is somehow so perfect that on Thursday, two days before that pigskin production, the Badgers play the Green Bay Phoenix in basketball.

“Really?”, you might be asking. “How do you connect the dots on that one?” Fair question. The basic point which will be explained in this article is as follows: If there is a single non-Wisconsin Big Ten school which rises to the forefront of the Wisconsin-Green Bay basketball game, it is Purdue. The reality behind that statement is much simpler than you might think. It just requires a little time to map out the connection.

One of the most significant moments in the history of college basketball in the state of Wisconsin was the Green Bay Phoenix’s win over California and a man named Jason Kidd in the 1994 NCAA Tournament. The year 2019 marks the 25th anniversary of that triumph for Dick Bennett. The potency of that 1994 win for Green Bay lies partly in the fact that it helped Bennett take the next step up the ladder to Madison and the Badgers in the fall of 1995. What Bennett developed at UW is still going today under the guidance of Greg Gard. There is a line of events and a series of roots which grew into tall trees and long, sturdy branches which have Wisconsin in great shape today. The success of Green Bay basketball 25 years ago was one of those central roots.

When Dick Bennett coached Green Bay to that huge win over Cal and Jason Kidd, he had a star player on his UWGB team. You might have heard of him: Tony Bennett.

The relationship which was coach-and-player became coach-and-assistant at Wisconsin and then at Washington State. Dick Bennett wanted to give Tony Bennett a program, so he stepped away at Washington State so that his son could become a collegiate head coach. In a very short time, Tony Bennett had already given a strong indication that as great as his dad was, he had the ability to become an even greater college basketball coach.

Taking Washington State to the Sweet 16? Making Washington State a top-four NCAA Tournament seed in consecutive seasons? No one does that. No one HAD done that… until Tony Bennett did it. Some really good basketball coaches had worked at Washington State in the past: George Raveling, Kelvin Sampson, Marv Harshman. None of them did what Tony Bennett managed to do.

Given what he pulled off in Pullman, Washington, Tony Bennett came to Virginia as a man capable of transforming the Cavaliers. The surprise isn’t that he succeeded; it is that he made Virginia successful at the very highest reaches of college basketball. Over the past six years, Virginia has won more ACC regular-season championships and gained more No. 1 seeds at the ACC Tournament than Duke or North Carolina. Virginia has become a heavyweight team with elite annual results.

There was, however, one missing piece in Tony Bennett’s resume, and entering the 2019 Elite Eight, a familiar story came full circle… with Purdue being part of the drama. This is why Purdue is the non-Wisconsin Big Ten school which offers the perfect accompaniment this week (albeit in football) to a Wisconsin-versus-Green Bay basketball game.

If Green Bay’s success helped give Badger basketball Dick Bennett, and if Badger basketball helped Tony Bennett begin his storied coaching career, one must then realize that Green Bay’s 1994 triumph is part of a chain of events which led to the 2000 NCAA Tournament and Dick Bennett’s ultimate coaching breakthrough.

Nearly 20 years before his son finally reached a Final Four at Virginia, Dick Bennett arrived at college basketball’s mecca. How did he do it, or more precisely, which school was the last obstacle standing in the way of that cathartic moment? Purdue. Wisconsin defeated the Boilermakers in the 2000 West Regional Final in Albuquerque. Bennett defeated Gene Keady, who is — and always will be — a valid answer to the question, “Who is the best college basketball coach to never make the Final Four?”

How wildly improbable it was, 19 years later, that Purdue, of all teams, would stand in Tony Bennett’s path as Virginia tried to make the Final Four for the first time in 35 years and give Tony the achievement his career had somehow not yet attained. Three years earlier, in 2016, Virginia played 10th-seeded Syracuse in the Elite Eight and gained a big early lead. That was a veteran Virginia team, the last team one would have expected to panic and get rattled by full-court defensive pressure. Yet, Syracuse’s press unnerved the Cavaliers, who imploded in the second half. Before the Virginia loss to UMBC — a 1 seed falling to a 16 seed — Tony Bennett had already tasted a supremely bitter defeat. UMBC wasn’t the first gut punch Tony had absorbed; he experienced that sensation two years earlier.

If Tony couldn’t beat Purdue, he would have to go through yet another year of “can’t win the big one” refrains. A career would have taken on the baggage which accumulates when an elite coach somehow doesn’t attain the one feat he is expected to capture at some point. Somehow, Virginia raced upcourt when trailing in the final seconds of regulation. Somehow, the Cavaliers tied the game on one of the most memorable plays in college basketball history. Somehow, the Hoos got to overtime. Somehow, they won and cross the threshold.

The end result: A Dick Bennett protege — his son — had beaten a Gene Keady protege, Matt Painter, in a regional final 19 years after the mentors had locked horns in Albuquerque. Wisconsin beat Purdue in the year 2000. A member of the Bennett family beat Purdue once again in 2019. This is how Purdue is the perfect Wisconsin football opponent at the end of the same week marked by a Badger-Green Bay basketball battle.

Wisconsin versus Green Bay is always a special game, but now that a member of the Bennett family has a national championship — lifting Dick and Tony to the height of their legacy in their moment of ultimate triumph — the presence of Green Bay on the other side of the court lends even more stature to this particular edition of Badgers versus Phoenix.

The rise of the Bennett family to the very top of the college basketball coaching profession is the perfect backdrop for a game between two schools whose existences and legacies are soaked in the contributions and influence of Dick and Tony Bennett. You could not have scripted this 2019 basketball reunion any better… and you could not have had a Wisconsin football game at the end of this week against a more appropriate opponent.

Marquette comeback against Purdue gets Wisconsin’s attention

Looking at the Marquette Golden Eagles’ win over the Purdue Boilermakers before Marquette faces the Wisconsin Badgers on Sunday.

The shiny object found in the Marquette Golden Eagles’ 65-55 win over the Purdue Boilermakers on Wednesday night was the 40-point second half the Golden Eagles slapped on Matt Painter’s crew. If Marquette has established an identity in recent years, it is that it can explode on offense at any time. Markus Howard can break free. Seton Hall might have Myles Powell, but Howard makes sure that Marquette always has as much firepower as the opposition, if not more. A 40-point second half is on brand for MU and Steve Wojciechowski.

Yet, while looking at the shiny object — 40 points after halftime in a relatively low-scoring game — one shouldn’t ignore the more substantive aspect of a game in which Marquette came back from a 13-point halftime deficit (38-25). The Golden Eagles held Purdue to just 17 points after the intermission.

If Marquette — which got run off the floor by Ja Morant and Murray State in the first round of the 2019 NCAA Tournament — is to improve as a program and become more of a national force in the Big East Conference, it will come at the defensive end of the floor. Being good enough and tough enough to hold Purdue to 17 points in a half sends a very positive message before Marquette faces the Wisconsin Badgers on Sunday. Such a feat is… well… very Wisconsin-like.

As we size up the Golden Eagles before they visit the Kohl Center on Sunday afternoon, we are brought in touch with a fundamental question: As good as Marquette was in that second half, was the 40-17 drubbing the Golden Eagles handed to the Boilermakers a primary product of MU’s ability to adjust, or was it more a result of Purdue not finding an answer to the departure of Carsen Edwards?

From the Marquette side of the equation, the Golden Eagles have to feel confident they can defend at a high level. They can’t control Purdue’s limitations; they got punched in the mouth in the first half and could have wobbled. Instead, they roared back against a team which came within an eyelash of making the Final Four last spring. Marquette did what was within its power to do. To that extent, the Golden Eagles deserve ample credit.

It is the Purdue dimension of this question which is more encouraging to Wisconsin. Purdue, for those not getting up to speed on college basketball as football enters its crucial home stretch, lacked answers at crunch time versus Texas — in Mackey Arena — a few days earlier. If Purdue had solved Texas but then stumbled against Marquette, the Golden Eagles could be viewed in a more favorable light. Because Purdue couldn’t use home-court advantage well against a previous opponent, however, this loss to Marquette seems like a trend more than a plot twist or an aberration.

Wisconsin can therefore look at Purdue and arrive at the conclusion that Marquette pounced on an especially vulnerable opponent. Wisconsin can look at the statistics and see that Marquette shot just 7 of 25 from 3-point range and won by 10… because Purdue was just 6 of 24 from long distance and a shocking 9 of 21 from the free throw line. If Purdue can’t stand on its own this season without Carsen Edwards, Wisconsin — lacking Micah Potter for no legitimately good reason — can stand on the strength of its balance and its defense.

Wisconsin doesn’t just have a chance to beat Marquette this Sunday. The Badgers can send a message to Purdue and the rest of the Big Ten about their resourcefulness, their balance, and their quality. Just imagine what a win without Potter could do for a team which is still settling into this season. A win over Marquette would settle some scores and enable Wisconsin to feel a lot more settled and calm about its long-term prospects.