Historic player organization movements are only the beginning

If a players union is ever going to exist at the college level, it will not come from the generosity of college athletics administrators.

Earlier this week, a group of Pac-12 players sent a letter to the Players’ Tribune with a list of demands for the conference and are threatening to opt-out of the 2020 football season should those demands not be met.

The list was later shared by a number of Pac-12 athletes on Twitter, including Oregon star Penei Sewell, who is a projected early first-round pick in the 2021 NFL Draft.

The players’ demands cover a wide range of issues, from COVID-19 safety to racial justice and compensation. For COVID-19 protections, players want the ability to opt-out of the season free from punishment within their programs and for safety standards to be maintained by a third party. To protect the status of all sports during the pandemic, they are demanding pay cuts from Commissioner Larry Scott, as well as coaches and administrators.

They also want the right to profit off their name, image and likeness, as well as the distribution of 50 percent of total conference revenue from each sport evenly among the athletes in those sports.

In response to this, players across the nation voiced their support for the movement, including Florida defensive end Zachary Carter.

Groups of players in both the Big 10 and Mountain West followed suit, giving their own list of demands to conference administrators. However, the lists of demands from those conferences aren’t as broad as that of the Pac-12 players. They only address COVID-19 safety and not wider-reaching social issues.

These movements have shown unprecedented levels of player organization at a time when it is desperately needed. As players unions in the NBA, MLB and NFL have negotiated substantive protections for their players, college athletes — who have no representation whatsoever — have been largely forced to go along with the (generally terrible) decisions made by those who allegedly care about their best interest.

Of course, the players have power; any group of organized laborers does. It’s the reason trade unions exist in the first place. But without a union (which the players desperately need for a number of reasons, as the Pac-12 players have demonstrated), the players are essentially powerless as individuals.

That’s why these grassroots organizational movements are so important. Once players realize they have power in numbers, they will be able to affect change within the system. Maybe not everything they are demanding, but significant change nonetheless.

If a players union is ever going to exist at the college level, it will not come from the generosity of college athletics administrators. Allowing the players, who aren’t technically employees, to unionize would give the game away for the NCAA. If players can collectively bargain, the current system of college athletics would be burned to the ground.

And it should be.

Because ultimately, the value of college sports isn’t derived from the NCAA. It comes from the players. And the only way the players will get what they deserve is if they force the issue through organized, collective action.

If met, the demands of the Pac-12 players would preclude the league from competing in NCAA-sanctioned events, as nearly all of them violate current amateurism rules. But, so what? Do the conferences really need the NCAA to survive?

Talking to ESPN, Ramogi Huma, founder of the college athletics advocacy group the National College Players Association, phrased the answer succinctly.

Huma said the players are aware that if the Pac-12 met their demands that the conference would not be eligible to participate in NCAA-sanctioned competitions or championships.

“Right now, it’s clear that the conferences don’t need the NCAA. Each conference is an industry unto itself,” Huma said. “[The players are saying,] ‘We’re fine if our conference doesn’t belong to the NCAA at all. We need to be treated fairly.'”

Don’t misunderstand, some reforms are certainly possible within the system, as state legislators allowing players to be compensated for the use of their names, images and likenesses shows.

But historically, massive, systemic reforms for labor groups tend to stem from one thing and one thing only: tireless and unflinching advocacy from the laborers themselves until those taking advantage of them have no choice remaining but to listen.

[lawrence-related id=17201,16181,11677,6219]

Michigan State announces pay cuts in athletic department, including salaries of Tom Izzo and Mel Tucker

Tom Izzo and Mel Tucker will have their salaries reduced by 7% to help the department combat losses sustained during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Michigan State University has announced a number of salary reductions in the athletic department to help cope with financial losses due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Michigan State basketball coach Tom Izzo and football coach Mel Tucker will see their salaries reduced by the most total money, while athletic director Bill Beekman will take the greatest cut by percentage at 10% of his $772,00- salary. All staff members that make $100,000 or more annually will see a reduction in pay.

Izzo and Tucker are among a number of coaches making more than $500,000 that will see their pay reduced by 7%. Also included are six of Tucker’s assistants and MSU women’s basketball coach Suzy Merchant.

Tucker’s reduction will come off his base pay, which is listed as $3.8 million. Meanwhile Izzo’s base pay is around $430,000, but his salary reduction will be based off of his total compensation, which is closer to $3.5 million.

Other reductions within the department will be levied on a tiered scale: 6% for salaries between $400,000 to $499,999, 5% for salaries between $300,000 to $399,999, 4% for salaries between $200,000 to $299,999, 2.25% for salaries between $150,000 to $199,999, and 2% for salaries between $100,000 to $149,999.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=516986277]

Report: NFL could play on Saturdays if no college football this season

The National Football League is considering playing on Saturdays if college football is canceled this season, according to a report.

The powers who be in the NFL are considering a number of options to ensure the 2020 regular season could be played in one shape or form this year in light of the coronavirus pandemic.

One option is to schedule games on Saturdays if college football is canceled, according to Andrew Marchand of the New York Post.

“With the NFL expected to release its schedule soon, its officials have discussed giving the league some flexibility to move games to Saturdays this fall if college football postpones its entire season, according to sources,” Marchand writes.

The NFL normally plays a slate of Saturday games late in the season when college football has wrapped up for the year.

The league is expected to announce some sort of schedule for the 2020 season by May 9. As of Wednesday, however, the NFL announced furloughs, pay cuts and pension contribution reductions for its employees.

Whether or not an actual season will truly come to fruition is still up in the air and at the mercy of the coronavirus.

[lawrence-related id=60476]

Updated Saints salary cap space estimate after in-house roster moves

The New Orleans Saints changed deals for Michael Thomas, Terron Armstead, Kiko Alonso, Patrick Robinson, David Onyemata, and Drew Brees.

[jwplayer SlfxKCBG-ThvAeFxT]

The New Orleans Saints have been active in creating more salary cap space and retaining their own free agents, hammering out contract extensions and restructuring existing deals while also agreeing to pay cuts with a few veterans on the roster’s fringe.

With the NFL’s 2020 salary cap established at $198.2 million, the Saints went into free agency with limited resources. But they’ve gotten creative and managed to re-sign Drew Brees and David Onyemata, while redoing their contracts with Kiko Alonso, Patrick Robinson, Michael Thomas, and Terron Armstead. Here’s where they stand.

Right now, it appears that the Saints are somewhere around $10,515,877 beneath the salary cap. That doesn’t account for the team’s free agent contract with Malcolm Jenkins, which hasn’t been reported in great detail just yet. But if that deal is structured like the others, the Saints should still have ample cap space to work with.

But how did they get here? To start, the Saints extended their contract with Brees, raising his 2020 salary cap hit from $15.9 million to $23.65 million. That’s an increase of $7.75 million, which was nearly accounted for in pay cuts for Alonso (from $8.7 million to $3.15 million) and Robinson (from $4.8 million to $3.45 million). Those two moves resulted in savings of $6.9 million, nearly breaking even on the costs of re-signing Brees.

So with Brees settled, the Saints turned their attentions to the restructures for Armstead and Thomas. They each converted significant portions of their 2020 base salaries into signing bonuses, which is not the same thing as a pay cut. When teams do this, the players get a big check now and raise their future salary cap hits, which gives them more security. The benefit for the team is that it grants them more spending room.

In this case, Armstead’s salary cap hit fell from $16 million to $8,356,260 per Nick Underhill of NewOrleans.Football. Likewise, Underhill reported that Thomas reduced his salary cap figure from $15 million to just $7 million. That’s a lump savings of $15,643,740.

But we can’t forget Onyemata’s contract extension, which will count for $3.5 million against the 2020 salary cap, per Underhill. While Onyemata’s salary cap hits in 2021 and 2022 will each elevate to $10 million (and he’ll leave behind $2.5 million in dead money in 2023), it’s a short-term boost for the Saints.

While we need the exact year-by-year figures on Jenkins’ free agent contract, for now it’s apparent that the Saints have enough funds to address their needs. And they can create more by extending the contracts of Janoris Jenkins (due $11.25 million against the cap), Sheldon Rankins ($7.69 million on his fifth-year option), or Taysom Hill ($4.641 million, on the first-round restricted free agent tender). They might also extend the contracts of veterans like Larry Warford (whose $12.875 million hit ranks second-highest behind Brees) or Jared Cook (accounting for $9 million in the final year of his deal).

So what does this tell us? The Saints are far from finishing doing business. Expect another busy day of roster moves.

[vertical-gallery id=30339]