Kirk Cousins’ ridiculous take on COVID is why we can’t have nice things

Vikings quarterback Kirk Cousins has some very interesting opinions on the coronavirus. They’re also dangerous and selfish.

Professional athletes have an interesting tendency to believe in their own invincibility. They are able to accomplish things both physically and mentally that most of us are only able to dream of doing. At the highest level, they are paid massive sums of money, and are celebrated around the world. If you walk into that reality with ill-informed opinions about your power to transcend the most mundane, yet inevitable realities of life, it can lead to some really interesting… and stupid… ideas.

Exhibit A this week woould be quarterback Kirk Cousins of the Minnesota Vikings, who has some really unfortunate opinions about the coronavirus. Cousins recently appeared on Kyle Brandt’s “10 Questions” podcast on Spotify, and dude was peddling some serious snake oil. Cousins and Brandt were discussing the use of masks to prevent the spread of the virus, and to eventually help stamp out an insidious, easily-spread killer that has already taken over 180,000 lives in America alone.

Per Andrew Marchand of the New York Post, Brandt asked Cousins, “If 1 is the person who says, ‘Masks are stupid, you’re all a bunch of lemmings’ and 10 is, ‘I’m not leaving my master bathroom for the next 10 years,’ where do you land?”

“I’m not gonna call anybody stupid, for the trouble it would get me in,”Cousins replied. “But I’m about a .000001.”

Brandt asked him why, and Cousins said, “I want to respect what other people’s concerns are. For me personally, just talking no one else can get the virus, what is your concern if you could get it, I would say I’m gonna go about my daily life. If I get it, I’m gonna ride it out. I’m gonna let nature do its course. Survival-of-the-fittest kind of approach. And just say, if it knocks me out, it knocks me out. I’m going to be OK. You know, even if I die. If I die, I die. I kind of have peace about that.”

Yeah, there are several problems here.

First, the refusal to adhere to individual protocols that are absolutely proven to stem the spread of the virus is an astonishingly selfish and stupid thing to do. The evidence is both obvious and overwhelming that wearing masks does so, while refusing to wear masks and going about your daily life is an almost sure way to spread the virus and quite possibly lead to the sickness and death of more people. Unless you’re taking your cues from various politicians whose professional futures are highly reliant on people ignoring the ramifications of a disease they have proven too ignorant and incompetent to control, this is the “well, duh” statement or our time.

Second, whether Cousins believes he has radical superhero powers to combat the virus or not, he can’t possibly believe that this extends to everyone he might come into contact with, right? Can he? One assumes Cousins is going to follow protocol on the field and in meeting rooms — wearing masks, getting tested daily, and so on — because the NFL won’t let him play if he doesn’t. And because of those protocols, over the last week, the league administered 58,621 tests to a total of 8,739 players and team personnel, and there were four new confirmed positive tests among players and six new confirmed positives among other personnel. That was split with 23,279 tests administered to 2,747 players, and 35,342 tests administered to 5,992 personnel. If the NFL didn’t do this, there would be major outbreaks in most or every NFL facility and the 2020 season would not exist. Period, end of story.

Third, if Cousins is walking around the city of his choice with this belief, refusing to wear a mask like some tinfoil-hatted yobbo, he maintains a far larger likelihood of catching the virus, and spreading it as either a symptomatic or asymptomatic carrier. Kirk Cousins is a family man. He’s a famous athlete who will experience people coming up to him and asking for a few minutes of his time, and perhaps an autograph. As preposterous as the “if I die, I die” mindset is regarding his own life, it is absolutely inexcusable when it comes to the lives of others. Because when he’s saying, “If I die, I die,” he’s effectively saying, “If you die, I don’t care.”

That’s a harsh thing to say, and a harsh thing to write, but after six months of watching this virus kill thousands of people, and negatively impact the lives of every person in America to a greater or lesser degree, wiping out jobs and creating fear and sadness, to cavalierly disregard what this virus is and what it will continue to be if we are all selfish and stupid enough to ignore it? Well, that’s a bridge too far. Maybe the rest of us aren’t at peace with dying.

Tragically, there’s no known way to change this mindset except for the people who have it to experience their own deaths, or the deaths of the people closest to them. One must possess empathy — the capacity to understand and feel what another person is experiencing from within their frame of reference and put oneself in another’s position — to understand that just because you have a “screw it, don’t do it” mindset doesn’t mean everyone else does. One must possess the ability to put logic beyond your own experience into the equation, and get the concept that just because you don’t have COVID doesn’t mean that you won’t get it.

And to whatever extent Cousins has people looking up to him and choosing to follow his example because he is a professional athlete — well, we can only hope that doesn’t lead to any more tragedy than we’re all already experiencing. Hopefully Cousins will never be a carrier of anything more than a seriously ill-informed opinion.

Several NFL teams halting activities after receiving positive COVID tests from one lab

BioReference, one of several labs processing COVID tests from NFL teams, has the league looking into testing irregularities after a rash of positive results.

Several NFL teams have postponed activities after it COVID tests from one lab, based in New Jersey, revealed a rash of positive tests.

“Saturday’s daily COVID testing returned several positives tests from each of the clubs serviced by the same laboratory in New Jersey,” the NFL said in a Sunday morning statement. “We are working with our testing partner, BioReference, to investigate these results, while the clubs work to confirm or rule out the positive tests.  Clubs are taking immediate precautionary measures as outlined in the NFL-NFLPA’s health and safety protocols to include contact tracing, isolation of individuals and temporarily adjusting the schedule, where appropriate.  The other laboratories used for NFL testing have not had similar results.”

[lawrence-related id=107751]

Interestingly, the Chicago Bears pointed to the possibility of false positive tests in their statement on the matter:

This morning we learned yesterday’s Covid-19 testing identified nine players/staff as positive. We followed additional NFL-NFLPA testing protocol and confirmed all nine results as false positives. Out of an abundance of caution, we postponed this morning’s practice to this afternoon at 1:30pm.

The Browns have also run into this issue, per the team’s statement.

After consistently receiving encouraging results from daily testing since returning to the facility in July, the Cleveland Browns’ COVID-19 testing process conducted yesterday initially indicates multiple individual presumptive positive cases that include players, coaches and support staff. Although, we have received indication from the NFL that they are investigating irregularities in lab results that have also impacted other clubs, out of an abundance of caution, we will immediately follow our comprehensive Infectious Disease Emergency Response plan and pause any activity in our building today and conduct meetings virtually. As per plan procedure, the team is also diligently reviewing proximity data for contact tracing and instructed self-isolation for those who tested positive and others as appropriate even though they all remain asymptomatic. Our facility is currently undergoing a thorough deep-cleaning and disinfecting process and is closed to all personnel for the day. We will provide updates as testing results are confirmed and more information is available.

Per ESPN’s Kevin Seifert, the Buffalo Bills have also been affected, and that Bills general manager Brandon Beane said that 10-11 teams are impacted — which means that 10-11 teams are now part of a league investigation to determine whether or not the test results are accurate.

And the Jets have also been affected.

To call so many false positives an “irregularity” would be correct. As Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network indicates, “The NFL has conducted well over 100,000 COVID-19 tests since camp began with a positivity rate that’s a fraction of 1% and dropping. A sudden flood of positives from different testing sites, all processed by the same lab, raises a red flag.”

Several, in fact. According to MIT Medical, false positives are exceedingly rare.

The PCR test for COVID-19 works by detecting genetic material from SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The genetic material from SARS-CoV-2 cannot be confused with the genetic material from other viruses, so the COVID-19 diagnostic test is highly specific. This means it almost never gives a false positive. If you are tested for COVID-19, and the test comes back positive, you can be very sure that you are infected with this virus. The new antigen test for COVID-19 is also very specific and rarely gives a false positive.

BioReference, which also provides testing services to the NBA and Major League Soccer, details its testing procedures on its website.

Antibodies are proteins produced by the body’s immune system to try to fight infection. BioReference offers a test that utilizes a blood sample to measure SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels, which correlate with a patient’s immune response after COVID-19 infection. Based on early evidence, antibodies are is expected to be elevated in the majority of patients by 14 days after the onset of symptoms. The timeline for antibody elevation in asymptomatic patients is still being studied.

So, we have one of two possible outcomes here. Either the New Jersey lab has irregularities in the tests it processed for the NFL, or the New Jersey lab results are correct, and the other labs the NFL are using are not accurate. While he league uses several different labs to avoid backlogs; the idea is to get the test results back within 24 hours.

There is also a new saliva-based test that has been rush-approved by the FDA, which is hoped to provide quick, inexpensive, and accurate testing at a higher rate. In June, more than one NFL general manager told Yahoo Sports’ Charles Robinson about the hope for a saliva-based test that was quicker and more affordable for everyone, and that, per Robinson, “it was one of the big hopes to keep fans safe and a season on track.”

NFL is considering ‘hard bubble’ for 2020 postseason

The NFL isn’t insisting that its personnel quarantine in “hard bubble” environments, but that could change in the postseason.

At this point in time, the NFL is not telling its teams to put players, coaches, and staff in a “hard bubble” in which everyone is basically quarantined together. People on team payrolls generally have the choice to stay in team-supplied hotels, or return home every day after practice.

But as Saints head coach Sean Payton recently told USA Today’s Jarrett Bell, that could change if things get complicated in the face of the coronavirus pandemic.

“Every night, we’ve got 170 stories,” Payton said, referring to people in the team’s employ who could contract the virus. “Some stories are safe ones. Some stories are long ones. The one assistant coach who had it, his nanny got it in Florida. She was in the house when he was there. So, those stories can vary. But, nonetheless, when you’ve got 170, man, you’d better recognize, that’s a lot of stories.

“All I’m trying to do is just reduce those stories. Look, it’s not foolproof. I told ‘em, ‘If you need to go home and see your kids, go.’ This isn’t mandatory. Even for the staff. But at least we’re trying to reduce the possible variables that come into going home and coming back to work.”

Payton said that around two-thirds of his 80-man training camp roster is staying in the team’s hotel bubble, which is about standard. And though none of his players have tested positive for the virus yet, Payton isn’t taking for granted that this is the way it will go all season.

“I’m proud and glad that we haven’t had a positive test, but you need to know something: Just when you think everything is good, bam! We’ll have eight,” the coach concluded. “That’s how this [virus] works. This isn’t like we’ve got this figured out. Man, we don’t have this figured out.”

Thus, in a recent call with the league’s Competition Committee, Payton broached the subject of an absolute bubble for playoff teams — should the season get that far down the road without one or more of those “Bam!” moments.

The NFL would prefer to mirror the relative success stories of the NBA and NHL, which have been able to work through their seasons in bubble environments, as opposed to Major League Baseball, which has seen a number of positive tests and game cancellations with a more lax approach.

Troy Vincent, the NFL’s executive vice president of football operations, told reporters on Wednesday that “We have to be flexible. All things are on the table.”

It could be that the NFL is able to manage its season without a hard bubble — and it could also be that a hard bubble, in which every team is quarantined through the week, is the only way to save the season if there is a series of outbreaks. But it’s good to see the league trying to get ahead of this, led by Payton’s mindset.

Tracking the COVID-19 opt outs

A running tracker of the NFL players who have decided to forgo the 2020 season due to COVID-19

As the NFL looks to return to some semblance of normalcy with the opening of training camps, the reality on the ground is that the upcoming NFL season will be anything but normal. With the world still dealing with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, NFL players are choosing to opt out of the upcoming season.

Under the agreement reached between the NFL and the NFLPA, players have until August 3rd to choose to opt out of the year ahead. Players deemed to be in the “high-risk” category will earn $350,000 for the upcoming season, and those not placed in that category will earn $150,000 for the year ahead.

Here are the current players who have decided to forgo playing in the 2020 season:

Laurent Duvernay-Tardif, G, Kansas City Chiefs

Dont’a Hightower, LB, New England Patriots

Brandon Bolden, RB, New England Patriots

Marcus Cannon, T, New England Patriots

Dan Vitale, FB, New England Patriots

Najee Toran, New England Patriots

Chance Warmack, G, Seattle Seahawks

De’Anthony Thomas, WR, Baltimore Ravens

Maurice Canady, CB, Dallas Cowboys

Caleb Brantley, DE, Washington Football Team

Kyle Peko, DT, Denver Broncos

The first name on this list might be the most notable, as Duvernay-Tardif is a licensed doctor in Canada who has been on the front lines of the pandemic over the past few months. In a statement released on social media, Dr. Duvernay-Tardif outlined his reasons for opting out of the upcoming football season:

The number of Patriots opting out also is notable. The biggest name among them is Hightower, who has been the heart of the Patriots’ defensive front for years and is one of the league’s best off-ball linebackers. In fact, if you think about New England’s three recent Super Bowl wins, there is a strong case to be made that Hightower made the biggest plays in each contest. In Super Bowl XLIX Hightower stopped Marshawn Lynch at the goal line just before Malcolm Butler’s interception, and he did it with a torn labrum in his shoulder. In Super Bowl LI it was Hightower’s strip-sack of Matt Ryan that kept the Patriots in the game. Then in Super Bowl LIII Hightower had two huge sacks of Jared Goff and perhaps was the best choice for MVP.

But the loss of Brandon Bolden, a player who flies under the radar outside of New England, is also notable. Bolden has been a staple on New England’s special teams units during his two stints with the team, and could also contribute as a role player in the offensive backfield. Then there is Marcus Cannon, the Patriots starting right tackle, choosing to opt out. Cannon was diagnosed with non-Hodgkins’ Lymphoma after his physical at the 2011 Scouting Combine showed some irregularities. His absence could force the team to slide Joe Thuney to right tackle, as he has some experience playing outside, or to rely on untested players such as Yodny Cajuste or Justin Herron.

Touchdown Wire wishes all of these players, and their families, well during these times. This list will be updated as events warrant.

What the Miami Marlins’ COVID outbreak tells us about the NFL season

The Miami Marlins are dealing with a COVID-19 outbreak that threatens the MLB season. What can the NFL learn?

NFL fans got the news they were hoping for over the past week, when the league and its players came to an agreement on how to proceed with training camp and the NFL season in light of the continued spread of COVID-19.

News Monday morning might be cause for concern as training camps begin to open this week.

Major League Baseball returned to action last week, and it was fantastic to see another sport get off the ground along with Major League Soccer, the NWSL, the NBA, and the WNBA. Sure, images of empty stadiums, or cardboard cutouts sitting atop the Green Monster at Fenway Park, took some getting used to, but having baseball back provided a bit of normalcy.

That normalcy, as we have often seen during 2020, seems under threat today:

This news has already sent ripples throughout the baseball – and larger – world. The Marlins canceled their home opener against the Baltimore Orioles, which was scheduled for Monday night. Having spent the opening weekend of the season in Philadelphia playing the Phillies, there are concerns about continued spread:

But beyond the immediate impact, there are larger concerns already being discussed behind the scenes:

Now let’s turn to the NFL, as training camps begin to open.

Many argued that when it comes to the NFL, the league had the benefit of “going last.” They would be able to observe how the various professional leagues handled COVID-19, and any outbreaks, to see what works, and what did not. With the benefit of time and additional information, the NFL would be in the best position to complete a full season on time and with minimal disruptions.

This Marlins news brings some issues into question.

First, what does this mean for teams based in some of the current COVID-19 hotspots? Obviously Florida is in the midst of an increase of cases, and with teams based in Miami, Jacksonville and Tampa Bay, how can the league best handle teams playing in such hot zones? This list could be expanded to include the Houston Texans and Dallas Cowboys, as well as the Arizona Cardinals and the California teams, as those states are seeing a similar rise in cases.

Second, what does this do for the idea of a bubble? MLB decided against using the bubble concept during their return to the field, as as we have seen, after just one weekend of play a situation has potentially threatened the season. Couple that with this:

Things have not been perfect, as both the NWSL and MLS had to deal with flare-ups on some teams, but the implementation of a bubble environment seems to have prevented community spread within those settings.

Should the NFL follow suit?

Again, we all want to see football in the fall. Returning to the original point for a moment, the NFL was in the best position because of time and the opportunity to see what works, and what does not. From what we have seen from the various leagues so far, the bubble environment seems to be the best way to return to play safely.

Should the NFL go down the same path? Right now, it seems like a bubble provides the best way to get back to the game. Of course, it would need to be modified in some way. Sure, in their bubble MLS moved around 2,000 people to a single location, with 26 teams practicing and playing within a secured sports facility. How could that work for the NFL, especially in a training camp setting? Or would the bubble have to be modified in a sense, housing teams together post-training camp?

Back in June, Dr. Anthony Fauci proposed the idea of a modified bubble for the NFL. Keeping players isolated from the community at large, and testing them regularly, was the best way in Dr. Fauci’s mind to return to the game. Recent data and information likely supports that position.

Perhaps a model could be implemented where, post-training camp, teams are then isolated in modified bubbles. The NFL and the NFLPA have agreed on conditions regarding player activity away from the field – with strict penalties for those who fail to comply – and the league needs to have a zero tolerance standard for any transgressions. As the Marlins situation outlines, this virus can spread through a locker room very quickly, and it just takes one slip-up for a team’s season to be threatened, or the sport’s season.

Because if this Marlins situation has taught us anything, perhaps playing sans bubble is the quickest way to threaten an entire league.

Whatever the NFL decides, we all hope for the best for the players, coaches, staff and their families. These are certainly uncertain and challenging times.

Ravens players join viral #WeWantToPlay campaign asking NFL to address COVID-19 concerns

With training camps set to start this week, Ravens players joined others around the league in asking the NFL to address health concerns.

NFL training camps are opening up this week, with rookies first set to appear. For the Baltimore Ravens, their rookies will enter the Under Armour Performance Center on Tuesday with the whole team expected to report on July 28. The only problem: The NFL still doesn’t have answers on testing protocols and how to practice safely during the coronavirus pandemic.

While the NFL and NFLPA continue to work out the logistics of players returning, there are far more questions than answers. Yet, the NFL continues to march towards the opening of team facilities for training camp with reckless abandon despite the ongoing confusion from both teams and players. Houston Texans defensive end JJ Watt spelled out what the players currently know and the problems they face.

Several Ravens players have joined Watt and others from around the league in a now-viral “#WeWantToPlay” campaign on Twitter. Players are asking the NFL to provide more detailed answers and improved conditions at training camp to ensure the 2020 regular season can actually start safely.

[vertical-gallery id=47779]

 

Mark Andrews keen to play in 2020 despite pre-existing health concerns

Baltimore Ravens tight end Mark Andrews wants to get on the field in 2020, despite being in a higher risk group for COVID-19.

The 2020 NFL season is currently scheduled to start on time, but there’s a group of players with pre-existing medical conditions for whom the prospect of playing in the COVID-19 era is a little more uncertain and medically questionable. However, some players with medical issues are prepared to get out on the field when the games start. One such player in Baltimore Ravens tight end Mark Andrews.

Andrews suffers from Type-1 diabetes, a condition that could put additional stress on his immune system should he contract the coronavirus. But speaking on a Zoom call with the Children with Diabetes group, Andrews sounded like a man who was willing to play in 2020.

Type-1 diabetes is a chronic condition in which the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing cells of the pancreas, according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. While current data suggests people with Type-1 diabetes aren’t any more likely to contract COVID-19, they do face a higher chance of experiencing serious complications if they do get it, according to the American Diabetes Association.

This isn’t the first time Andrews has talked about his diabetes in correlation with COVID-19. In a video call with reporters in March, Andrews sounded pretty confident about his health.

“So, just like everybody else, I’m staying smart, I’m staying inside, I’m social distancing myself from other people. That’s all you can do. Everyone has to do their jobs and stay smart and listen to their health officials during this time, and I think we’re going to be alright if we do that.”

Baltimore is expected to have a big year, due in no small part to the role Andrews played in 2019. He led the Ravens with 64 receptions and 852 receiving yards while also scoring 10 receiving touchdowns over 15 games. Only four tight ends in the NFL had more yards than Andrews.

According to Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network, as of last Friday 72 NFL players have knowingly tested positive for the coronavirus. However, this is before mandatory testing has been carried out, so there’s a chance more players have contracted the virus but are asymptomatic. The virus is not going away, and the NFL may eventually have to accept that the 2020 season is not going to happen. But if the decision was left up to the players, Mark Andrews seems as though he’d like to suit up and get on the field.

[vertical-gallery id=50097]

No player jersey swaps in 2020 due to COVID-19

Once an amazing part of the postgame process, players swapping jerseys are just one of the things out this season as the NFL fights COVID-19

There’s gonna be a lot of really sad NFL players this season when teams play against the Baltimore Ravens. After tons of players lined up following games to swap jerseys with Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson last season, the NFL is prohibiting the activity this coming season.

The NFL is forbidding teams from postgame interactions, including the jersey swap, and prohibiting players from being within six feet from one another following the final whistle, according to NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero. The idea seems to be to limit player interactions as much as possible and therefore any potential transmission of the coronavirus.

However, some players like former Baltimore tight end Hayden Hurst and safety Eric Weddle, and current wide receiver Willie Snead, showed contempt at the idea.

Players and fans identified how silly the concept is on Twitter, calling the NFL out for only caring about the optics of the situation rather than the health of anyone involved. Considering football involves players coming into close contact during blocking and tackling, handshakes and hugs following the game seemingly pales in comparison.

However, as Pelissero later noted, the new rule was agreed to both by the NFL and NFLPA. While it doesn’t seem to make a ton of sense on the surface, it’s one of the few things both the league and players union have agreed upon thus far.

Though most fans might be left scratching their head at this rule, most would probably agree that anything needed in order to have a 2020 regular season is a good thing. For those Ravens opponents that want a Jackson jersey this season, they’ll have to visit the stores like everyone else.

 

Players react quickly to NFL’s new (and ridiculous) COVID safety protocols

The NFL issued a set of safety protocols to contend with the coronavirus pandemic. Let’s just say it didn’t go over well with the players.

To put it kindly, the NFL has not always been on the vanguard of player safety. One only has to go back to the league’s history regarding head trauma to confirm that. So, it should come as no surprise that as the league tries to manage the possibility of a safe season in the middle of an increasing coronavirus pandemic, there have been bumps along the way. NFLPA president and Browns center J.C. Tretter has addressed this at length, and two new rulings that came down from the league office on Thursday met with immediate derision from NFL players.

First, there’s the new rule against players exchanging jerseys after games, which seems hilarious after those same players have been crashing into each other for three hours.

49ers cornerback Richard Sherman led the charge on this series of reactions, and he’s entirely correct.

Sherman’s teammate, tight end George Kittle, was similarly perplexed.

Panthers receiver D.J. Moore was quite succinct on the subject.

And Texans left tackle Laremy Tunsil, who knows a thing or two about wearing masks (badumching), had this to say:

Of course, this is a ridiculous rule, and seems to be more about limiting player expression than anything else.

Then, there was a second rule which makes even less sense, if that’s at all possible.

Okay, so… we’re  practicing social distancing when it comes to jersey exchanges, but we’re letting coaches and players interact on the sidelines without masks? And everyone else on the sideline has to wear a mask? Say what? There is no way to do the math on this and make it work.

The NFL is less than a month away from having training camps open on its particular schedule, and the fact that the league is throwing weird stuff like this out in the open when it comes to the absolutely vital aspect of player safety looms large when we talk about a 2020 NFL season starting on time, surviving a 16-game regular season and subsequent postseason, or existing at all. And having the players this up in arms about it does not bode well for the agreements that will need to take place before those players will take the field.

Report: NFL and NFLPA discussing player opt out for 2020 season

With concerns over COVID-19 rising in parts of the country, the NFL and the NFLPA are working on a potential opt out provision for players.

As more sports leagues, including the NFL, work to open up again in the face of a global pandemic, concerns about player safety remain at the forefront of the leagues and the players themselves. As professional baseball teams are beginning to practice again, some well-known players have chosen to opt out of playing in the season ahead, including David Price and Ryan Zimmerman, Even Mike Trout, one of the game’s premier stars, has expressed reservations.

According to a report Wednesday from Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network, the league and the NFLPA are working on a player opt out provision for those athletes who are considering sitting out the 2020 season due to concerns over COVID-19. Pelissero reported this on “NFL Now,” giving the following information:

My understanding is both the union and the league intend to have an opt-out for players who have either a pre-existing condition, family (members) with pre-existing conditions, just general concerns over COVID-19, would not want to play this season. General managers were told on a call earlier this week there would be a specific date by which players would need to opt-out. That date is still to be determined.

While no NFL players have definitively stated a desire to sit out the season due to concerns over COVID-19, some players have expressed reservations. On their “Double Coverage” podcast, Devin and Jason McCourty of the New England Patriots discussed the potential difficulties of getting a full 90-player roster together for training camp. More recently Stefon Diggs, an offseason acquisition by the Buffalo Bills, took to Twitter to share his concerns about starting back up:

There are so many moving pieces regarding starting the season back up, and chief among them is player safety and how comfortable the individual players – and their families – are about potential exposure to COVID-19. Making these issues all the more difficult to deal with is the fact that this is not a “one size fits all” situation, as factors on the ground in various parts of the country differ wildly from state to state. For example, New York was one of the nation’s more precarious situations a few months ago, and now that state is enforcing mandatory 14-day quarantine periods for travelers from other states, such as California, Florida and Arizona. How that impacts players trying to get to Buffalo, for example, for training camp remains to be seen.

As the league and the NFLPA look to work on potential opt out provisions, it is yet another reminder that the 2020 NFL season will be unlike any we have seen in recent history.