Dak Prescott, the reported looming franchise tag and its fallout

After not getting an extension signed last offseason, the Cowboys and their quarterback are at an impasse once again, according to reports.

Cowboys fans couldn’t even enjoy their Super Bowl parties without the first bit of stomach-churning drama for their offseason. With hours still to go before the Chiefs began their way to a 31-20 victory in Super Bowl LIV in Miami on Sunday, reports suggested new head coach Mike McCarthy and the staff he’s assembled in Dallas could very well find themselves without their starting quarterback in the building when work starts back up.

According to NFL Network’s Mike Garofalo and Ian Rapoport, the team is “expected to place a franchise tag” on Dak Prescott.

That could in turn result in the four-year veteran skipping offseason workouts this spring and mark the second-straight year that one of the team’s main playmakers stays away until their contract desires are met. In 2019, Ezekiel Elliott held out while seeking a new deal.

Prescott is currently not under contract, as his rookie deal officially expired when the Cowboys’ season ended. The 26-year-old, coming off his best statistical season as a pro, has been a financial steal for the club since being selected in the fourth round of the 2016 NFL Draft and then thrust into the starting job over Tony Romo just months later. The two sides were unable to come to an agreement over the 2019 offseason, with Prescott playing in good faith that the team would make his contract extension a priority.

And yet…

“I’ve heard nothing to indicate that they are anywhere close to a contract extension,” Garofalo reported on-air from South Florida.

That would put Prescott on a collision course with a franchise tag later this month or in early March. The club may elect to use a tag designation as a way to extend the negotiating window, as they did two seasons in a row with defensive end DeMarcus Lawrence. “It would also ensure Prescott is paid in the high-$20 million range for the 2020 season should the Cowboys use the nonexclusive tag,” as NFL.com points out. “An exclusive tag, which prevents another team from signing him, guarantees $30-plus million.”

Prescott’s 2019 salary was just over $2 million. “The franchise tag, though only a one-year deal, would,” according to Dallas radio station 105.3 The Fan, “pay Prescott $33.4 million, which is in the ballpark of the yearly salary he has been seeking.”

But Prescott has been vocal about wanting to secure a multi-year deal, even telling ESPN’s Sage Steele that he was “confident” a new contract was coming. But he also admitted to Dan Patrick that he thought it was coming last year, too.

Elliott was a holdout for all of the team’s 2019 training camp and preseason as he waited for a deal to get done with Jerry and Stephen Jones in the front office. When he returned just prior to Week 1, though, Elliott was largely a plug-and-play fixture in the Dallas offense.

Prescott, who again is under no contractual obligation to appear, would severely handicap the Cowboys coaching staff already dealing with major changes in the first year of the McCarthy regime. Kellen Moore will return as offensive coordinator and look to establish his identity as a play-caller in just his second year in the role. Doug Nussmeier will act as the new quarterbacks coach after working with the tight ends previously. Plus, there are new position coaches for the offensive line, wide receivers, tight ends, and running backs.

That’s a lot of newness to be installed all at once. The league even gives teams with new head coaches extra sessions of offseason work to compensate. Having the field general who hasn’t missed a game in four full seasons would be a significant bonus for the offensive players and provide a strong sense of continuity in the huddle. One has to wonder how productive any of that would be if the starting quarterback is M.I.A.

Back in September, during the previous round of extension chatter, Cowboys executive vice president Stephen Jones spoke about Prescott’s leadership and importance to the team, but also made it clear that a deal for any individual also has to keep the team’s salary cap in mind.

“Man, he’s the ultimate leader,” Jones was quoted as saying. “He’s got all the respect in the locker room. No one roots for him more than Jerry and I. Everybody, I know he does, all want to get this contract done, but it’s got to be right for Dak. People are obviously wanting to get it right for him. At the same time, we want to get it right for our team. At the end of the day, we’re just trying to divide up the cap space. That can be difficult when you’ve got as many great, young players as we have. Certainly Dak, he wants what’s best for the team. So does Zeke, so does DeMarcus Lawrence. We got guys who want to win.”

Cowboys Nation went through this in 2019 with both of the other players Jones mentioned. Fans should strap in and get ready for a new round of money meetings, contract comparisons, and holdout hypotheticals.

Prescott and the Dallas front office already have.

Justin Simmons sounds open to playing on franchise tag in 2020

It sounds like Broncos safety Justin Simmons would be willing to play on a one-year franchise tag in 2020.

The Broncos would like to sign safety Justin Simmons to a long-term contract extension this offseason but if the two sides are unable to reach agreeable terms, a one-year franchise tag will be among Denver’s options.

The franchise tag for safeties next season will be worth around $12 million. That’s nearly three times more than what Simmons earned over four years on his rookie contract, according to Spotrac.com.

Players sometimes have a disdain for franchise tags and hold out, hoping for a long-term commitment. If the Broncos tag Simmons, it sounds like he would be willing to honor a one-year deal.

“If I could just be a part of [Vic Fangio’s defense] for one more season, I’m all on board for that,” Simmons said on KOA Radio on Tuesday, via The Athletic’s Nicki Jhabvala. “Because all you need is one season. Like you said, the 49ers weren’t even in [the playoffs] last year. I think we found our quarterback. I know we have a great defensive unit. If we could just find a way to d it one more year I think it’d be something special.”

Simmons would obviously prefer a long-term deal but he would be willing to play on a franchise tag and then go from there. John Elway, Denver’s general manager, hopes the two sides can reach a multi-year agreement.

“Obviously, we have the franchise option there, but we’d like to get something done with Justin for the long term,” Elway said in December.

[vertical-gallery id=631819]

Should the Seahawks pursue a trade for Matthew Judon?

The Baltimore Ravens are expected to franchise tag and shop pass rusher Matthew Judon this offseason. The Seattle Seahawks could be a fit.

It’s no secret the Seattle Seahawks will be heavily involved in the pass rush market this offseason. A dismal effort last season, even after the addition of Jadeveon Clowney and Ziggy Ansah, was perhaps the team’s biggest weakness, a glaring hole that needs to be addressed before the 2020 campaign – regardless of whether or not they re-sign Clowney.

The Seahawks are involved with nearly every trade or free agent anyway, but fans can bet they’ll be even more active when it involves pass rushers.

ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported last week that Ravens pass rusher Matthew Judon, who has recorded seven or more sacks in each of the last three seasons, is a potential trade candidate this offseason.

Judon is set to hit free agency in March, but Baltimore is expected to place the franchise tag on him, potentially opening up the door for them to shop him around on a one-year deal.

Considering the haul of draft picks recent trades of Frank Clark and Dee Ford netted teams, it would make sense for Baltimore to do the same – as they look to keep their books clear for an eventual record-setting contract for Lamar Jackson in a few years.

Judon would immediately become Seattle’s most prolific pass rusher, and the team has plenty of draft capital and cap space to get a deal done – while retaining Clowney as well if they so choose.

Judon made his first Pro Bowl appearance this year – getting a chance to spend a week with Seattle’s coaching staff as well as Russell Wilson and Shaquill Griffin. Perhaps the extended familiarity between the two sides will make the Seahawks more inclined to pursue him, if they saw a potential fit.

Expect the Seahawks to be involved in nearly every available pass rusher this offseason while they look to shake things up and get to opposing quarterbacks more often in 2020.

[lawrence-related id=55441]

Should the Steelers use the franchise tag on LB Bud Dupree?

The Steelers will have some financial choices to make about Bud Dupree.

In just over a month, all 32 NFL teams will begin the process of designating which players they plan to use the franchise or transition tag on players. The date period runs from February 25 to March 10 and this is significant for the Pittsburgh Steelers. The name most associated with the franchise tag and the Steelers this offseason will be linebacker Bud Dupree.

Dupree is set to hit the free-agent market coming off of his best season as a pro. The Steelers gave Dupree his fifth-year option in 2019 and he rewarded them with 11.5 sacks. This nearly doubled his career-high to that point.

But now the Steelers are going to have to pay up. If they don’t, some other team will. They could buy themselves an extra season with the franchise tag but if you do that you are banking on Dupree continuing to improve.

[polldaddy poll=10494569]

The projected franchise tag amount for a linebacker per Over The Cap is $16,266,000. That is a huge financial commitment to a player with one good season under his belt. Would you do it? Cast your vote and let us know.

[vertical-gallery id=458043]

[lawrence-related id=458158]

Would the Saints use the franchise tag to keep Teddy Bridgewater?

New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees as a clause against it in his contract, but could they use the franchise tag on Teddy Bridgewater?

[jwplayer ooYL34ml-ThvAeFxT]

Few teams have a quarterback situation as complicated as the New Orleans Saints face in 2020. All three rostered passers are going to be free agents — Drew Brees and Teddy Bridgewater are scheduled to test the open market, while the team will likely have right-of-first-refusal status for Taysom Hill. No matter what happens, Brees and Bridgewater have a combined $25.3 million in dead money on the books for 2020, though that can could be kicked further down the road with new deals.

Brees, who turns 41 next week, has said he’ll continue to take things year-to-year. It’s a safe bet that the’ll return given how well he played in 2019 (even if Minnesota Vikings coach Mike Zimmer out-dueled him and Sean Payton in the playoffs), but it’s not a completely-sure thing.

It’s easy to argue that Bridgewater should return to New Orleans and continue to wait it out, having proven himself a worthy heir-apparent when Brees missed five games with a hand injury. But asking a young player to ride the pine for two years is easier said than done, and Bridgewater shouldn’t lack for options in free agency.

Teams that could part ways with incumbent quarterbacks include the New England Patriots, Los Angeles Chargers, Las Vegas Raiders, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, and Carolina Panthers. Neither Tom Brady nor Philip Rivers have committed to returning to the Patriots and Chargers, while Raiders coach Jon Gruden is famously fickle with his quarterbacks. Buccaneers coach Bruce Arians publicly vented frustration with Jameis Winston, while new Panthers coach Matt Rhule may want to start fresh after Cam Newton missed more than a year with injuries.

Other teams like the Chicago Bears and Jacksonville Jaguars are determined to go down with the ship, anchoring themselves to bad starters like Mitchell Trubisky and Nick Foles (though Gardner Minshew gives Jaguars coach Doug Marrone a life-line). The Cincinnati Bengals and Miami Dolphins are targeting quarterbacks in the draft, while the Tennessee Titans may have caught lightning in a bottle with Ryan Tannehill.

So Bridgewater should have more suitors than he heard from last offseason, when the only serious offer came from the Dolphins. And Miami simply wanted him to be a sacrificial lion in their tanked 2019 campaign; Ryan Fitzpatrick played that role instead. It would be a serious stunner if the Saints can recruit Bridgewater into sticking around another year as a backup.

Even more unlikely is their option to use the franchise tag. It would guarantee Bridgewater more than $24 million in 2020 (official amounts are not yet set by the league office) but would keep him off the open market, and guarantee the Saints significant draft capital (two first-round picks) if another team tried to sign him. They’re already fairly cash-strapped, so this isn’t realistic.

An alternative could be the transition tag, which would fully-guarantee something north of $22 million. It offers the right of first refusal, allowing Bridgewater to negotiate a contract with another team which the Saints could opt to match. The downside is the Saints are left with no compensation should he leave. Even though the NFL is a business first and foremost, tagging Bridgewater to force him to remain with the Saints would be a huge reversal from the positive relationship he’s built with the team since they first traded for him. And for what it’s worth, Brees has a no-tag clause in his contract.

So neither of these options feel like routes New Orleans wants to take. The best situation for the team could be a repeat of the 2019 configuration; Brees and Bridgewater both return at depressed salaries (Brees drawing $20 million-plus as a starter, and Bridgewater getting around $8 million as a backup) while Hill plays on a low-cost restricted free agent tender. But that may not be a realistic expectation considering where each player’s career arc is trending.

Uncomfortable as it may be, fans will have to remain patient and let this process play out. We won’t know whether Brees or Bridgewater sign contract extensions until the free agent signing period is here, but the tag deadline (March 10, at 3 p.m. CT) is a date to circle on the calendar. Hopefully they work out something more amicable.

[lawrence-related id=15811]

[vertical-gallery id=26617]

AJ Green will skip Bengals OTA’s if franchise tagged

Georgia Football great AJ Green will skip OTAs if franchise tagged by the Cincinnati Bengals.

Georgia great AJ Green is one of the most humble, drama-free players in the NFL.

However, when it came time to step up and think about himself first, Green did so.

Good for Green, who has sat the whole season, a contract year, with injury.

Last offseason, Green said multiple times that he would like to stay in Cincinnati and finish his career there.

The two parties have not reached a deal that would allow him to play out the rest of his career in Cincy, and the Bengals have said they would franchise tag Green if they could not reach a long-term deal.

To that, Green responded that he would play the regular season, but will skip OTAs and maybe training camp.

Green, 31, would be paid $18m next season if he is tagged by the Bengals.

Green gets that, but he said it makes him feel like the team is not committed to him.

“But that also shows that they’re not committed, and in that circumstance,” Green told ESPN, “I have to protect myself.”

If the Bengals do tag Green, they will have until July to reach a deal before the tag turns into a one year contract.

If no deal is reached, Green will not participate in much preseason training.

Can you blame him, though? He’s on the wrong side of 30, he has a history of getting injured and he’s still one of the best receivers in the NFL when healthy.

He does not need training camp or OTAs anyway. He’s AJ Green.

Why risk injuring yourself in practice when you’re franchise tagged rather than under a long-term deal?

Jadeveon Clowney not worried about potential contract extension

The Seattle Seahawks have yet to discuss a contract extension with star DE Jadeveon Clowney, but he’s only focused on the next game.

[jwplayer CyWAa1YN-ThvAeFxT]

Seattle Seahawks defensive end Jadeveon Clowney had without a doubt his best game of the season in Week 10 against the San Francisco 49ers, earning NFC Defensive Player of the Week honors.

His breakout game, and Seattle’s relative lack of pass rush otherwise, has lead to many speculations about his future with the squad.

Clowney is a free agent after the season, and a provision in his trade to Seattle means the team cannot franchise tag him after the year.

That means Seattle has from now until March 18 to sign Clowney to an extension, else he becomes a free agent capable of signing with any team.

However – Clowney isn’t letting his future distract him from the present.

“I’m not really worried,” Clowney told Seattle media members on Wednesday. “Right now, I’m just focusing on trying to get ready for the Eagles. It’s a lot of football left. I’m really focusing on this season. I don’t care about looking down the road. It’s just one game at a time because we can do something special here.”

Clowney came to Seattle just before the start of the season in a trade with the Texans, who acquired Barkevious Mingo, Jacob Martin and a 2020 third round pick in exchange for the 2014 first overall pick.

He’s racking up numbers in Seattle, posting 25 combined tackles, three passes defended, three forced fumbles, and two touchdowns.

Clowney admitted he has spent time in previous seasons thinking about his financial future – part of the reason he’s committed to not doing so in Seattle.

“I thought about that last year, what was going to happen with the contract,” Clowney said. “I thought about it the year before I was on my last year. I’m done thinking about that. Just take it one game at a time. One season. One play. You never know what’s going to happen. You can be one play away from the end and it all could blow up in your face. Just continue to have fun. Continue to play at a high level. Enjoy this game because it can be taken away from you at any minute. Not worried about what the future holds right now.”

Clowney and the rest of the Seahawks will keep their attention on the Eagles, who they will play in Philadelphia on Sunday morning at 10:00 a.m. PT.

[lawrence-related id=51281]