Warriors add Illinois playmaker in second round of latest Rookie Wire mock draft

In the latest mock draft from Rookie Wire, the Warriors landed Coleman Hawkins out of Illinois in the second round.

Although the Golden State Warriors don’t have a pick in the first round of the upcoming NBA draft, Steve Kerr and Mike Dunleavy Jr. will have the chance to add a player when they hit the clock in the second round of the 2024 draft.

Heading into June’s draft, the Warriors have one pick, the 22nd pick in the second round (52nd overall). As draft season heats up, mock drafts are beginning to release predictions for the draft at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York.

In the latest mock draft from Cody Taylor of Rookie Wire, the Warriors added a playmaker out of Illinois in the second round of the draft. At No. 52 overall, the Warriors selected 6-foot-10 forward Coleman Hawkins out of Illinois.

Via @RookieWire on X:

https://x.com/RookieWire/status/1794639651052920961

Read Taylor’s full mock draft via Rookie Wire here.

Hawkins played four seasons for Brad Underwood with the Fighting Illini. In 2024, Hawkins earned All-Big Ten third-team honors, averaging 12.1 points on 45.1% shooting from the field to go along with 36.9% from deep. Hawkins added 6.1 boards and 2.7 assists in 31.6 minutes per game last season with Illinois.

Hawkins helped lead Illinois to the Elite Eight in the 2024 NCAA Tournament before losing to eventual champion UConn.

The 2024 NBA draft is set for June 26-27 in Brooklyn, New York.

Former Wisconsin basketball star receives crystal ball to transfer to Big Ten rival

What would your reaction be to AJ Storr committing to Illinois?

Former Wisconsin Badgers star guard A.J. Storr received a 247Sports crystal ball prediction to choose Illinois.

Storr entered the transfer portal after Wisconsin’s season-ending NCAA Tournament loss to James Madison. He also entered the NBA draft while maintaining his eligibility, though a return to college seems the more likely conclusion.

Related: Tracking Wisconsin basketball’s reported transfer portal visits and targets

Storr averaged 28.8 minutes, 16.8 points, 3.9 rebounds, 0.9 assists and 0.6 steals in his one year with the Badgers. He was the engine of Wisconsin’s offense for much of the season, especially the team’s run to the final of the Big Ten Tournament.

A possible transfer to Illinois would mean three colleges in as many seasons for Storr. It would also mean seven schools in seven years dating to high school.

Illinois needs help on the wing entering 2024-25: Terrence Shannon Jr. is out of eligibility. Storr’s fit makes sense: He originally committed to the Illini out of high school before flipping to St John’s.

Wisconsin, meanwhile, is looking to find Storr’s replacement in the transfer portal. The Badgers are in pursuit of several of the portal’s top forwards as both Storr and Tyler Wahl’s production needs to be replaced.

For more on Wisconsin’s roster and transfer portal activity, check out Badgers Wire’s ongoing 2024 transfer portal tracker.

Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes and opinion. Follow Ben Kenney on X.

[lawrence-related id=73207,73631,72531,71615]

Seahawks take another Illinois defender in this way-too-early 2024 mock draft

The Seattle Seahawks’ 2023 NFL draft class has a distinctly Midwest flavor to it.

The Seattle Seahawks’ 2023 NFL draft class has a distinctly Midwest flavor to it – with almost half of their picks coming from the Big Ten conference. At the top of the class is cornerback Devon Witherspoon, who comes from an pro-level defense at Illinois.

There’s still a whole year to go before next year’s draft, but one way-too-early 2024 mock draft has Seattle hitting up that Fighting Illini defense again. In Doug Farrar’s ’24 mock the Seahawks select Illinois DT Jer’Zhan Newton at No. 16 overall. Newton (6-foot-2, 280 pounds) posted 5.5 sacks and 14 tackles for a loss as a Junior. Here are the highlights.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbycpfe4qgv9nf6 player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=]

Michigan State vs. Illinois basketball round two statistical preview

No. 25 Michigan State hits the road to take on No. 22 Illinois.

[jwplayer EBPdXA3C-PROpJzTY]

No. 25 Michigan State is reeling, having lost three straight games and five of their last eight. The Spartans will be looking for a better road result as they travel to take on No. 22 Illinois in Champaign Tuesday night (9:00 ESPN). Michigan State is 1-4 in their last five road conference games, with the lone victory coming against Minnesota.

Let’s take a look at how these two teams match up from a statistical standpoint and where edges can perhaps be gleaned.

Advanced stats and ranks courtesy kenpom.com.

Overview

Michigan State: 16-8 overall, 8-5 Big Ten

-No. 10 in adjusted efficiency

-No. 19 in adjusted offense

-No. 17 in adjusted defense

-No. 101 in adjusted tempo

Illinois: 16-7 overall, 8-4 Big Ten

-No. 27 in adjusted efficiency

-No. 41 in adjusted offense

-No. 25 in adjusted defense

-No. 250 in adjusted tempo

This will be a matchup of two desperate teams. After being tied for the Big Ten lead just two weeks ago, Michigan State and Illinois have lost a combined five straight games. The Illii lost on the road against Iowa and dropped a massive contest at home to Maryland, which vaulted the Terps into the top spot in the Big Ten. If either team wants to keep their shot at the Big Ten alive, this is a must win. Illinois can’t afford to go two games back to Maryland and Michigan State with both of those teams holding tiebreakers over them. Michigan State can’t afford to lose another conference game if they want to crawl their way back into the regular season race. It should be a good game in an absolutely electric environment.

Let’s dive into some specifics.

A note: Four factors is something you will see in these posts a lot. They are four statistical categories that heavily dictate good basketball vs. bad basketball. They are: effective field goal %, turnover %, offensive rebounding %, free throw rate (FTA/FGA). If a team is good at these four things, they are good at basketball.

When Michigan State has the ball

Michigan State Offense four factors: No. 82 in eFG% (effective field goal), No. 94 in turnover %, No. 35 in Oreb%, No. 192 in free throw rate

Illinois defense four factors: No. 55 eFG% against, No. 300 in turnover %, No. 51 in Oreb%, No. 18 in FTR

For the first time all season the Michigan State defense is ranked higher than the Michigan State offense in KenPom. The Spartan offense has been an absolute nightmare on the road, especially in the early part of games. Maybe they figured something out in the second half against Michigan? After scoring only 23 points in the first half, the Spartans scored 45 in the second half. We’ll see. The shooting numbers are certainly troubling as they’ve been in decline for a while and Illinois does a pretty good job in that spot defensively. MSU’s turnover issues plagued them early last week, but they cleaned that up after the first ten minutes against Michigan. They’ll absolutely have to protect the ball, especially considering Illinois does not force turnovers at a high rate. An underrated factor to MSU’s offensive decline has been the plummeting of their free throw rate and with Illinois being one of the best teams in the country at preventing opponents from getting to the line, it’s hard to imagine that changing in this game.

When Illinois has the ball

Illinois offensive four factors: No. 199 in eFG%, No. 148 in turnover %, No. 7 in Oreb%, No. 160 in FTR

Michigan State defensive four factors: No. 3 in eFG% against, No. 325 in turnover %, No. 61 in Oreb% against, No. 91 in FTR

One of these thiiiiings is not like the others.

Illinois is middling at three of the four factors on offense, but, as you can see, they are one of the best offensive rebounding teams in the country. They attack the glass as a team and have one of the best rebounders in the country in Kofi Cockburn. The Michigan State defense is going to do what it always does; play sound man defense and force tough shots that will lead to a lot of rebounds. If Michigan State wants to win Tuesday night, they absolutely cannot get crushed on the glass. It is, by far, Illinois’ biggest strength on offense. Michigan State is capable of having very good rebounding games, but the bigs are going to have to bring it and the guards are going to have to contribute as well. It has to be the number one concern going into this game for Michigan State.

Other key numbers

We always like to look at three-point shooting here and Illinois is quite bad at that. As a team they are 296th in the country in three-point percentage and 324th in 3PA/FGA. In short, they don’t take a ton of threes and they don’t make a ton of threes.

Trent Frazier is their best shooter by volume, shooting 36% on just fewer than five attempts per game. Alan Griffin is also coming on as a shooter. He shoots 39%, but on less consistent volume. Still, he’s liable to take seven threes and make four of them.

Illinois ranks 213th on assists per field goal made. I’d guess a lot of that comes from their offensive rebounding. They get a lot of buckets on putbacks. Outside of that, their highest usage player Ayo Dosunmu plays a fair amount of isolation ball.

Despite Dosunmu’s high volume (he takes 27% of the shots when he’s on the floor) he’s not a very good shooter. His effective field goal percentage is only 50.2% and he struggles from beyond the arc. Where he can be really effective is at the free throw line where he shoots 81%. He doesn’t get there too often–which I think is the best critique of his game–but he certainly has the talent to do it in a given night. Keeping him off the line and forcing tough jumpers will be key.

Illinois is pretty good at limiting opponents’ attempts from three. They rank 57th in that category. I like to look at attempts forced rather than percentages made when evaluating a team’s three-point defense. Sometimes teams get hot and make shots, but a truly good three-point defense limits the amount of threes their opponent takes. Deep shots may be tough to come by for the Spartans.

Conclusion

Illinois is a really good team and it’s hard to win in their building. Add in to that Michigan State’s massive road struggles and this one looks to be an uphill grind for the Spartans. They’re going to have to protect the ball and limit Illinois’ second-chance opportunities. The more they can force the Illini to shoot contested jumpers, the better this will go. This is a huge spot for both teams, which I have highlighted plenty, so I expect a really competitive game. Vegas likes MSU by one point in this one, which I’m sure feels bold for many Spartan fans. KenPom has this one as a 70-69 win for Illinois, at a 51% chance of victory.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1363]

Northwestern-Illinois odds, picks and best bets

Previewing Saturday’s Northwestern Wildcats at Illinois Fighting Illini college football matchup, with NCAA football betting odds, picks and best bets

The Northwestern Wildcats (2-9, 0-8 Big Ten West) visit the Illinois Fighting Illini (6-5, 4-4) Saturday for a noon ET kickoff at Memorial Stadium (on FS1). We analyze the Northwestern-Illinois odds and betting lines, while providing college football betting tips and advice on this matchup.


Get some action on the game at BetMGM by placing a sports bet!


Northwestern at Illinois: Three things to know

1. Northwestern lost at home to the Minnesota Golden Gophers 38-22 last week to remain winless in conference play. The Wildcats gave up scores on the Gophers’ first three possessions. A bright spot for NU was the emergence of sophomore QB Andrew Marty, who entered early in the second quarter and completed 8-of-10 passes for 95 yards and a TD, while running for 52 yards and two more scores.

2. Illinois, which is bowl-eligible for the first time since 2014, had a four-game win streak snapped with a 19-10 loss at the then-No. 17 Iowa Hawkeyes last Saturday. The Illini were held to their lowest point total of the season and turned the ball over three times. Trailing 13-7, Illinois was intercepted in the end zone on its first possession of the second half, which was followed by a missed field goal on its next drive.

3. Northwestern has won the last four head-to-head meetings, including 24-16 last year. A win Saturday would mark the Wildcats’ first five-game winning streak in the series, which dates back to 1892 and that the Illini lead 55-52-5. Northwestern owns four four-game win streaks vs. Illinois.

Northwestern Illinois: Odds, betting lines and picks

Odds via BetMGM; access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated Wednesday at 4:45 a.m. ET.

Prediction

Illinois 38, Northwestern 17

Moneyline (ML)

AVOID. Illinois is -400. Every $4 wagered on the Illini to win outright would profit $1 if they do so (Ex: Bet $40 to profit $10). Betting on Northwestern (+280) would profit 2.8-to-1 if the ‘Cats prevail, but I don’t see that happening. However, I’m not willing to wager the -400 chalk and I’m going to pass.

Against the Spread (ATS)

ILLINOIS (-9.5, +100) is the STRONGEST PLAY. Coach Lovie Smith has turned the program around and the Illini are hungry for a win vs. their instate rival. They’ve covered six in a row are and 8-3 ATS this season, while the Wildcats are 2-9 ATS.

New to sports betting? Every $1 wagered that Illinois will win by 10 points or more will profit $1.

Over/Under (O/U)

A slight lean to the OVER 43.5 (-110). Both teams are 4-7 O/U this season, while Illinois averages 28.8 PPG and Northwestern scores at a lowly 15.2 per game clip. But with this being Senior Day in Champaign, Ill., look for the home team to keep its foot on the throttle.

Want some action in this one? Place a bet at BetMGM now. For more sports betting picks and tips, visit SportsbookWire.com.

Johnny’s 2019 college football record: 9-5 (November: 4-0).

November’s strongest plays: 6-3.

Follow @JohnnyParlay11 and @SportsbookWire on Twitter.

Gannett may earn revenue from audience referrals to betting services.  Newsrooms are independent of this relationship and there is no influence on news coverage.

[lawrence-newsletter]

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1623]