Ranking the top 32 NFL quarterbacks in CPOE going into Week 16

There is no quarterback controversy in Seattle.

There is no quarterback controversy in Seattle. Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll made that clear after his team’s win on Monday night over the Eagles, just in case it wasn’t already obvious. While Drew Lock deserves credit for leading them through their game-winning drive, these last two starts for Lock have proven that he’s nowhere near the level of quarterback that Geno Smith is right now – despite having superior velocity, range and athleticism. Carroll says Smith will play next week against the Titans.

Aside from the kind of decision making we saw him employ against the 49ers, Lock’s biggest issue on the field is accuracy. For his career he’s completed less than 60% of his pass attempts and against the Eagles he missed several passes badly – including an overthrow that would have been an easy touchdown for Tyler Lockett. Lock continued to miss right through that last drive, on which he only completed half of his 10 passes, of which three were in danger of being picked off.

This week’s QB rankings illustrates the lesson even further. While Smith ranks just outside the top 10 in completion percentage over expected (2.7%), Lock is near the bottom of the league at -5%. That’s not even good enough to crack the top 40 this year. Here’s how the top 32 quarterbacks stack up in this stat going into Week 16.

Ranking all 32 starting quarterbacks by CPOE going into Week 10

Here’s how all 32 starting quarterbacks compare in completion percentage over expected (CPOE) heading into Week 10.

This season we have been ranking starting quarterbacks around the NFL on a different stat every week. Last time around we picked QBR, which had Josh Allen of the Bills in the lead. This week Allen is on top of the pile again, offering more evidence that he’s outplaying the rest of the field this season.

Here’s how all 32 starting quarterbacks compare in completion percentage over expected (CPOE) heading into Week 10.

Ranking all 32 starting NFL QBs by CPOE going into Week 5

Now, let’s see how each starting QB stacks up in CPOE going into Week 5.

There are a lot of different ways to evaluate quarterback play. Each week this season we’ll be looking at a different stat to see how they compare. So far, we’ve done PFF grades, QBR and EPA/play.

Now, let’s see how each starting QB stacks up in CPOE (completion percentage over expected) going into Week 5.

Week 7 Adanced Stats: NFC East a one-horse race rode by phenom jockey

What Kellen Moore has put together with the weaponry at his disposal has Dallas pulling ahead in the division race. EPA, CPOE and success rate sing a beautiful tune entering Week 7. | From @ProfessorO_NFL

Football is a simple game. In the truest sense, it’s a game all about numbers. A team has four attempts to surpass 10 yards, the field is 100-yards long and approximately 53 and 1/3 yards wide. Both teams are allowed to line up 11 players at any given time.  A touchdown is worth exactly six points no matter how it’s scored, an extra point is worth one or two and a successfully made field goal attempt is worth three points.

Many fans keep up with yardage, touchdowns, sacks, interceptions and several other fun statistics as a measuring stick of how their team and individual players are performing.

At Cowboys Wire, each week the NFC East division performances are reviewed using advanced analytics. In this study advanced stats such as Expected Points Added, Completion Percentage over Expected, Success Rate and more to determine how the Cowboys, Eagles, Giants and Football Team stack up against each other and the rest of the league.  It will examine the who’s, what’s and why’s to uncover the hidden science that determine the most important statistic of all, wins and losses.

Brady vs Prescott: A one-sided battle is on tap in Cowboys-Pats

A look at the premium position in Sundays matchup between the Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots.

People love sports for different reasons. Sometimes, it’s the passion or the emotion associated with it. Families bond around Sunday afternoon victories (or wallow in the losses), and memories forge loyalty unlike anything else we experience. For me, I always liked football for its passion, but it was the mental aspect that made me fall in love.

The NFL is a 32-team chess match. This metaphor doesn’t just apply to the in-game strategy on Sundays, but the overarching philosophy a team chooses to deploy in roster construction and team-building as well. It means that the league is non-static, as each organization searches for the key that unlocks the next wave of success. That’s what makes this current season so interesting. Players like Patrick Mahomes, Lamar Jackson, Deshaun Watson, Dak Prescott and Russell Wilson are completely changing the landscape of what quarterbacks are capable of achieving. From a historical perspective, the current level of quarterback play is unprecedented.

At this point in time, there are several advanced metrics we can use to quantify the production of a team’s passing attack. I took seven of these metrics and made the effort to condense their information into two metrics. The rationale here is that we can combine information from the different stats to get an overall glimpse at player production (and two metrics fit into a graph more easily than seven). If you’re versed in statistics, this was done using principal component analysis, and the seven metrics used were:

  • EPA per Dropback
  • Success Rate (percentage of positive EPA plays)
  • Average Depth of Target (ADOT)
  • Sack Percentage
  • Interception Rate
  • Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt (from Pro-Football Reference)
  • Completion Percentage Over Expectation (CPOE)

In doing this, a significant portion of the signal was condensed into the first two components. Here’s a graph of single-season QB performance dating back to 2009, filtered to show passers with at least 100 pass attempts on the season.

A little bit of information on how to interpret these composite scores.

The first component (X-Axis) is an overall indicator for passing performance. In essence, it rewards a player for the good stuff (EPA, CPOE) and docks them for the bad (sacks, interceptions).

The second component (Y-Axis) isn’t quite that simple.

Here, this isn’t so much an indicator of quality as it is style. In a way, this composite score is capturing the aggressiveness of a passer, as it scores higher for players with a higher ADOT and interception rate, but penalizes them for a high CPOE.

I’ve highlighted the quarterbacks for this week’s matchup.

In the upper-right corner we see Dak Prescott’s 2019 season. In terms of his first composite score, Prescott ranks third overall  just behind Aaron Rodgers’ 2011 MVP campaign and Drew Brees’s 2018 MVP runner-up year (neither highlighted).

There are several other 2019 quarterbacks in the upper echelon of the first composite which would seem to suggest that teams are now better at leveraging a player’s skills for passing efficiency than they were in years past.

But encouragingly, Prescott is performing at this level while maintaining an aggressive approach, a positive indication for the explosive capabilities of the Dallas offense.

On the flip side, we find Tom Brady’s 2019 campaign just slightly above the overall average. As the face of the NFL and backbone of an epic dynasty, we’ve grown accustomed to Brady orchestrating the New England offense to fantastic efficiency, but the 2019 campaign has not reached those levels of expectation.

However, if we look at how this first composite score correlates from one year to the next, Brady is actually performing right about where we would expect, based on last year’s results.

Conversely, there’s been a common theme from many that they didn’t expect to see this caliber of progression from Prescott, and his first composite score would echo this sentiment as he’s performing well above what we’d predict given historical trends.

But if we revisit that first graph, we also see Brady scores relatively low on the second composite score.

If we take a look at his air yards distribution this season, it’s not hard to see why.

Brady is attempting passes of short length at a rate higher than the rest of the NFL, and as a result he’s attacking the deeper part of the field less frequently.

To be specific, 56% of Brady’s pass attempts have come within 5 yards of the line-of-scrimmage. The retirement of Rob Gronkowski and a revolving door of receivers have certainly played a factor here. Another way to see this is to compare the completion percentage density charts of Prescott and Brady.

We can see here the vast majority of Brady’s targets are around the line-of-scrimmage, and naturally he completes them at a high percentage. However, we also see that he hasn’t found great success targeting the perimeter, especially beyond 10 yards. When Brady has found success down the field, it’s most commonly been down the seam.

Prescott’s 2019 season seems all the more impressive in this chart, as there doesn’t appear to be an area of the field he can’t own. However, the chess game continues on Sunday, as Prescott faces his toughest challenge in grand-master Bill Belichick.

Here’s hoping the evolution of Prescott and the NFL continues.

[vertical-gallery id=634743][vertical-gallery id=634702][vertical-gallery id=633628][lawrence-newsletter]