The new ESPN, Fox and Warner Bros. sports app is a good idea, but it might create more streaming problems for you

I’m honestly not sure whether those changes are good or bad.

This is For The Win’s daily newsletter, The Morning Win. Did a friend recommend or forward this to you? If so, subscribe here. Have feedback? Leave your questions, comments and concerns through this brief reader survey! Now, here’s Mike Sykes.

Goooood morning, folks! Welcome back to The Morning Win. Thank you so much for rocking with us this morning. We appreciate you. Hope you’re having a great week.

I’m sure you’ve seen the news about the new upcoming partnership between ESPN, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery. If you haven’t, the three companies are partnering together to launch a mega sports streaming app they’ll each own a third of.

The service is going to include the combined inventory of live sports they all have. Yes, that means every league and every sport you love will be on there. NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL. Whatever it is, it’s on this app.

We don’t know how much this will cost or what it’ll be. We just know it’ll be a monster of a sports streaming app. With all of these resources combined, it’s essentially a mini-version of cable.

Our Andrew Joesph summed it up pretty well here:

“So, basically viewers can pay for a subscription to this bundle and access the live sports that the companies are broadcasting. When streaming services started, it seemed inevitable that someone would eventually just make cable all over again and try to present it as something different. That’s what Disney, Fox and WBD appear to be doing here — but for sports only. On top of that, NBC Universal and CBS/Paramount were not included in this partnership of competing media giants.”

Andrew hits the nail on the head there. It’s always felt like, at some point, a cable-like package would come back around and reset things as everybody and their favorite cousin pulled out an individual streaming service. It’s unfeasible to think everyone would pay for each of them individually in perpetuity. We needed a reset. I think this is what that reset looks like.

But at the same time, I’m still concerned about the number of streamers people will be expected to pay for as the rights to live sports continue to get chopped up like a Thanksgiving turkey.

Just think about it. Sure, you’ll get your Monday Night Football fix on ESPN via this megastreamer. Your local Fox and CBS games should pop up there, too, considering that those networks are partnered there.

But guess what? You’ll still have to pay for Prime Video’s Thursday Night Football if you want that. And if the NFL leans and makes Peacock a thing like it wants to?  That’s an additional two streamers you may need to watch the biggest NFL games of the week.

The NBA is flirting with Amazon for its TV rights, too. Obviously, the league is working with Turner and ESPN now. The presence of this new streamer makes that unlikely to change considering that the powers that be will want to retain it to keep people on their app. But what if Amazon buys the rights to, say, the Play-In Tournament or even the In-Season Tournament? That’s totally in the realm of possibility.

I say all of that to say that while this cable-like subscription package could be good, it doesn’t completely end the streaming wars. All of our favorite things are still fragmented and, as consumers, we’re still being jerked around in the end. And, don’t forget, the only thing we know about this new partnership is that it exists. We don’t know the cost or what subscription levels we’ll need to watch what.

The streaming era is coming to a close. Whatever it’s morphing into next is on its way. All we can do is hope it’s more consumer-friendly than what we’ve got here now.

DraftKings Drama

(Photo by Darren McCollester/Getty Images for DraftKings)

On the other side of the corporate world of sports, there’s quite a bit of drama going on on the betting side.

DraftKings is accusing its now former (???) head of VIP Michael Hermalyn of stealing employees and trade secrets as part of a year-long plot to leave the company for Fanatics.

Prince Grimes has more details here and, as he says, it sounds like something straight out of a movie plot. The company found out what Hermalyn was doing because it tracked him using geolocation data. Yes, it’s that serious.

Here are some of the juiciest details:

“It sounds like the company tracked Hermalyn’s location using the same technology online sportsbooks use to verify bettors are in legal betting territories (or to make sure NFL players aren’t betting at team facilities). And they pinpointed him at Fanatics’ offices during times he said he’d be somewhere else.

No, seriously. DraftKings actually tracked Hermalyn’s whereabouts on Jan. 29 and 30 using geolocation and access account records, after he emailed employees that a friend died and he had to deal with that.

“DraftKings has since learned, through geolocation data and access account records, Hermalyn had in fact traveled to California and visited Fanatics offices in Los Angeles on January 29 and 30,” the lawsuit says.”

You cannot make this up. In fact, I would love to actually see a movie plot based on this.

That’s only the tip of the iceberg. Hermalyn was also accused of using shady means to try and invalidate his non-compete agreement after leaving for Fanatics and working up millions of dollars from DraftKings in retention payments for him and his subordinates. It’s insane.

Keep in mind that all of this is going down just before the Super Bowl. That’s obviously the biggest day in sports betting and here DraftKings is dealing with this.

Yikes, guys. I don’t really know what else to say.

READ MORE: Here’s a full breakdown on the situation from Prince


Changing names

(AP Photo/Tyler Kaufman)

Stadium rights mean absolutely nothing to FIFA if you’re not paying them. Some of the NFL’s teams are finding that out the hard way.

FIFA has changed the names of multiple stadiums around North America as we inch closer to the 2026 World Cup. It’s hilarious because the names are, well, remarkably bland.

Andrew Joesph has more:

“We’re still two years away from the 2026 FIFA World Cup in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. But we’re already seeing the results of a grueling bidding process that cities and NFL owners were willing to go through in order to host these World Cup matches.

That apparently included the temporary changing of stadium names.

While we already knew that NFL owners agreed to install natural grass playing surfaces in time for 2026, they will also adhere to a FIFA policy about stadium branding. Basically, FIFA won’t let non-FIFA sponsors have their branding displayed during matches. And in the case of the U.S. — where corporate naming rights are the norm for stadiums — the venues we know are going to be called something entirely different for the World Cup.

And let me tell ya: FIFA did not put much thought into these temporary names.”

Man. Come on, FIFA. I feel like if you’re giving somebody else’s property a new name, you could at least be a bit more creative with it.

Peep the full names from Andrew here.


Quick hits: An updated NBA All-Star roster … Guests for the Usher Bowl … and more

— Here’s Bryan Kalbrosky with the updated All-Star rosters now that Trae Young and Scottie Barnes are in.

— Meghan Hall has 7 guests that Usher might bring out for the Super Bowl Halftime show. I kind of hope he just does it solo, though.

— Speaking of the halftime show, here are the best memes ever from it, by Michelle Martinelli and Charles Curtis.

— This Nikola Jokic profile in the New Yorker was so cool. Here’s more from Robert Zeglinski.

Patrick Mahomes had the highest praise for Caitlin Clark. That’s pretty cool. Here’s Robert again.

— Kahleah Copper is headed to Phoenix! Meghan Hall has trade grades for you here.

That’s all, folks! Happy Wednesday. We’re almost to the Super Bowl. Let’s get it.

-Sykes ✌️

Sports fans had jokes after Disney, Fox and Warner Bros. essentially recreated cable with new streaming app

Hear me out: What if they call this idea … CABLE?

Three of the major rights holders in American sports — Disney, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery — announced a massive streaming partnership on Tuesday. It’s a platform where viewers can access sports content from any of the ESPN, Fox and WBD/Turner linear properties and, well, choose what they want to watch.

You know, almost like cable! That’s because it’s exactly like cable.

Via CNBC:

Consumers would be able to subscribe directly via a new app. Subscribers would also have the ability to bundle the product with the companies’ streaming platforms Disney+, Hulu and Max.

[gambcom-standard rankid=”3011″ ]

The product will be a skinnier bundle of linear networks than a standard cable offering, specifically tailored for sports fans. It will consist of all the broadcast and cable networks owned by Disney, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery that carry sports, along with ESPN+.

So, basically viewers can pay for a subscription to this bundle and access the live sports that the companies are broadcasting. When streaming services started, it seemed inevitable that someone would eventually just make cable all over again and try to present it as something different. That’s what Disney, Fox and WBD appear to be doing here — but for sports only. On top of that, NBC Universal and CBS/Paramount were not included in this partnership of competing media giants.

Still, the entire recreation of “Cable, but for Sports!” had fans making plenty of jokes about the idea. We’ll have to see how this entire venture unfolds and how it impacts the bidding for media rights in the future.

Merger talks between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery took fans by surprise

A possible merger between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount would change the entertainment landscape forever.

The entertainment landscape would again undergo a massive change if a possible merger between Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global comes to fruition.

Axios reporter Sarah Fischer shared on Wednesday that Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav and Paramount Global Bob Bakish met in New York City on Tuesday to discuss the potential for a merger.

“The duo discussed ways their companies could compliment one another. For example, each company’s main streaming service — Paramount+ and Max — could merge to better rival Netflix and Disney+,” Fischer reported.

The move would see two of the biggest film and television studios combine, as well as two major news branches (CNN and CBS News) and sports entertainment brands (Turner Sports and CBS Sports), if it were to actually go through, which is not a certainty in these early stages.

It would be the biggest move of its kind since Disney officially merged with Fox back in 2019.

Fischer adds that antitrust laws might not hold a Warner Bros. Discovery/Paramount deal back because of WBD’s lack of a broadcast network.

“Executives are confident that the deal would receive regulatory approval, despite D.C.’s active antitrust climate,” Fischer wrote. “Notably, Warner Bros. Discovery doesn’t own a broadcast network, which would clear an easier path than would a combination with a company like NBC owner Comcast.”

However, Puck shared recently that other entities like Skydance Media and RedBird Capital Partners have been reported as looking at buying a majority stake in Paramount’s parent company, National Amusements Inc.

A possible merger could involve Warner Bros. Discovery merging with just Paramount Global or NAI on a whole, per Axios.

For media fans, the news of another major corporate merger between two legacy media companies drew plenty of surprise and some reservation.