Breaking down Amon-Ra St. Brown’s contract extension with the Lions

Breaking down Amon-Ra St. Brown’s record-setting contract extension with the Lions

The Detroit Lions interrupted the NFL draft conversation on Wednesday by locking up All-Pro wide receiver Amon-Ra St. Brown to a massive new contract extension. The deal locks up St. Brown through the 2028 season and includes the biggest amount of guaranteed money for any wide receiver in NFL history.

Per Spotrac, the new contract details show some cap creativity from the Lions. The deal is for $120.01 million over four years at the end of his current contract, which expires after the 2024 season. His salary cap hit for 2024 remains a relatively paltry $4.8 million.

After that, the cap hits escalate quickly thanks to the $77 million in guaranteed money, which includes a $16.6 million signing bonus. Only the prorated part of the signing bonus gets tacked onto the Lions cap in 2024.

The cap hit in the subsequent seasons, from Spotrac:

2025: $13.9M
2026: $33.1M
2027: $28.9M
2028: $41M

As is becoming the norm for the Lions and their contracts, they tacked on one void year to help spread out the cap hit even longer. The 2029 season voids and will cost Detroit $1.7 million in dead cap that year.

Get ready for more void years in Lions contracts

The Detroit Lions have been big on using void years in contracts to help spread out the salary cap hits. Get ready for more in 2024.

It’s still a little early to know which players the Lions will be chasing in free agency. However, it’s a pretty safe bet that some of the free agent signings, and also contract extensions, will include a void year or two in their contracts.

The automatic void year is a tool that COO Mike Disner and GM Brad Holmes have repeatedly used in managing the Lions salary cap. The void years spread out the cap hit of a new contract, intentionally amortizing the value over a longer period than the player will actually play for Detroit.

The Lions have been very good about avoiding unintentional dead money. Void years are a little different, even though the accounting ledger shifts the void years to dead money once the contract expires. The void years are a deliberate, intentional creation of dead cap obligations in order to make the contract more affordable at the time of signing.

This year, the Lions will eat some dead cap money on void years in a few contracts:

  • Halapoulivaati Vaitai – $3.84 million
  • Romeo Okwara – $3.5 million
  • C.J. Gardner-Johnson – $2 million
  • Graham Glasgow – $1.47 million
  • Emmanuel Moseley – $1 million
  • Teddy Bridgewater – $500,000

It’s a total of over $12.3 million in cap room sacrificed to void years. It’s an emerging trend where the Lions are one of the forefront leaders, and that isn’t expected to change.

As an example, let’s say the Lions want to sign free agent CB Chidobe Awuzie as a hypothetical target. PFF lists Awuzie with an estimated free agent contract value of $21 million over two years with $12.75 million (60 percent) guaranteed, and that seems like a reasonable ballpark figure for the Lions to try and hit.

Adding a void year onto the deal would spread out the $21 million salary over three years instead of two. It also allows the Lions to spread any signing bonus over another season, and that could be key in negotiating if another team is making a similar offer. It pushes some of the cap hit deeper into the future when the overall NFL salary cap increases. There’s some risk in kicking that can too often, but it’s been an effective tool for Disner and the Lions.

Expect them to keep using it.

 

A treatise on void years

Ever wondered exactly what void years are? Here’s a rundown on how they function and why Jason Licht and the Bucs use them so much:

It was reported on Tuesday that Lavonte David’s contract actually includes four void years on the tail end of it. Greg Auman of FOX Sports reported the same day that defensive tackle Greg Gaines’ contract also included four void years.

So what exactly are void years, anyway? And why do they help Jason Licht and the Bucs stay under the cap so much?

Simply put, void years are fake years added to the end of a contract. The player isn’t intending to play on the deal with those years, and if they did continue to play for a team, they would re-structure their contract instead. The purpose of a void year is to spread out the cap hit for the seasons that the player does intend to play so the team can have more flexibility in signings and operate better in a certain window.

For example: Let’s say a player has a contract worth $30 million over three years and then a signing bonus of $15 million. If their contract is $5 million in base salary and then $5 million in prorated bonuses, the cap hit on their contract would be $10 million every year for three years.

Here is what that would look like:

Base Salary Prorated Bonuses Total Cap Hit
Year 1 $5 mil $5 mil $10 mil
Year 2 $5 mil $5 mil $10 mil
Year 3 $5 mil $5 mil $10 mil
Total $15 mil $15 mil $30 mil

So, what if we added a void year?

Now, the same base salary ($15 million) will be paid over the first three years, but the extra void year would be added with the same base salary of $5 million. The signing bonus of 15$ million would be paid over four years instead of three (so $3.75 million a year instead of $5 million) which makes the cap hit much easier — for instance, you could lower the base salaries of the first two years to open up some cap room before it heightens at the back end.

Here is an example of how that might look:

Base Salary Prorated Bonuses Total Cap Hit
Year 1 $3 mil $3.75 mil $6.75 mil
Year 2 $4 mil $3.75 mil $7.75 mil
Year 3 $8 mil $3.75 mil $11.75 mil
VOID $5 mil $3.75 mil $8.75 mil
Total $20 mil $15 mil $35 mil

Eventually, though, a debt must be paid. Should any player with void years in their contract not extend once they arrive, the cap hit from those remaining prorated bonuses will be charged to the next year. In this example presented above, should this player go to another team or retire before the void year kicks in, that $3.75 mil prorated bonus — part of his initial signing bonus — would immediately go to Year 3 instead, since it’s already a part of the guaranteed signing bonus from the contract without a void year added.

The key thing to understand is that a team will always know that the cap space included in void years is real. It’ll never lose track of it or be surprised by it, but it can spread that out over multiple years to alleviate other heavy hits or clear space for marquee signings.

As such, it’s important to believe a team can contend if they use void years consistently. If they use too many, the team will have to take the brunt of the hit from however many they extend into the immediate next year if they don’t restructure the team’s contract. Licht and the Bucs tend to use them quite a bit, however, and thus the team must either believe they are set to contend in the near future or that the players who they are signing to contracts with void years in them will be re-signed in the future.

Vikings get creative, save $2.1 million with adjustment to Byron Murphy’s contract

The #Vikings freed up more than $2 million in cap space by adding three void years to Byron Murphy’s contract on Tuesday

Finances have played a huge role in the Minnesota Vikings’ ability to construct a competitive roster ahead of the 2023 season, and with an adjustment to newly acquired cornerback Byron Murphy’s contract, the team managed to save over $2 million against their salary cap.

This shrewd maneuver involved adding three void years to Murphy’s signed contract, which will incur a dead-money hit for the 2025 season, but free up $2.1 million for them this season. It is worth noting that this move got Minnesota under the salary cap limit, which should enable the Vikings to continue pursuing free agents as the offseason wears on.

The merits of these void-year arrangements are debatable, but for a team that sees itself as being in a championship window, they could prove themselves to be necessary if the Vikings truly think they can compete for a Super Bowl in 2023. While borrowing money from future seasons seems like a desperate move now, the risk would surely be worth the reward if Minnesota manages to bring home a Lombardi trophy next season.

Details of DE Marcus Davenport’s contract revealed

Davenport’s new contract with the #Vikings keeps his 2023 cap hit low but didn’t come without some risk to Minnesota’s future finances

The Minnesota Vikings were quick to secure the services of defensive end Marcus Davenport when free agency opened last week, and the details of his one-year contract were finally revealed on Sunday night.

Though this contract’s total value of $13 million was enough to lure him to the North Star State, the structure of the deal will keep his impact on the Vikings’ salary cap relatively low in 2023. Nearly all of this contract is guaranteed, and the $4.5 million signing bonus combined with the void years from 2024 to 2027 will spread out the financial toll of the agreement in the interest of minimizing its impact on the team’s short-term finances.

The cash-strapped Vikings couldn’t have made this deal happen without tacking on the void years to keep his cap hit manageable, though the strategy of gaining immediate talent at the expense of long-term stability could prove detrimental to the team in the long run.

After this season, Minnesota could end up paying Davenport for four years should they fail to re-sign him ahead of the 2024 season, which could present a quandary for the team if he doesn’t live up to expectations this year. Time will tell how this deal ends up affecting the team’s future, but for now, Vikings fans are sure to be happy that the team managed to sign the best available pass rusher on the market to bolster the team’s defense.

Addition of 4 void years puts Keisean Nixon’s cap number at $2.5M in 2023

The Packers added four void years to Keisean Nixon’s one-year deal to create $1,480,000 of cap savings in 2023 (and $1,480,000 of dead cap in 2024).

Thanks to void years, Keisean Nixon will count around $2.5 million on the Green Bay Packers’ salary cap in 2023.

Adding four void years (through 2027) to his one-year deal allowed the Packers to spread out Nixon’s $1.85 million signing bonus over five seasons on the cap, lowering his cap hit in 2023 from $4,000,000 (without voids) to $2,520,000, saving $1,480,000.

As a result, when Nixon’s deal voids next year, the Packers will take on a $1,480,000 dead money hit on the salary cap because the four years of prorated bonuses ($370,000 times four void years) will accelerate to 2024.

Void years continue to be a lever the Packers are willing to pull – both in new contracts and restructures – to create cap relief in the present while kicking the proverbial can down the road.

By using void years in this situation, the Packers were able to bring back an All-Pro kick returner at around one percent of the team’s total cap in 2023 while still giving Nixon a big pay raise (made $965,000 last year). Some of the bill be paid next year, but the Packers will be in much better financial shape in 2024, especially once Aaron Rodgers is traded and his contract is wiped from the books.

You can view Nixon’s contract structure on Over the Cap.

[lawrence-related id=91148]

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbxb1xg7g19wqdc player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=]

How many Saints players will be franchise tag-ineligible due to void years?

The Saints previously restructured contracts with Cameron Jordan and Demario Davis that make them franchise tag-ineligible, but it’s an option in the future for other players:

No team has weaponized automatically-voided contract years (also sometimes called “ghost years”) like the New Orleans Saints. Their go-to tool has helped them navigate some hazardous waters, working around the salary cap to put the best team together and hold onto as much talent possible. But it’s not without costs. Whenever a contract voids, any prorated payments (often leftover signing bonus payouts kicked down the road) accelerate to the immediate offseason if the player doesn’t sign a new deal. And, depending on when the contract is scheduled to void, it could take the franchise tag out of play.

Teams can pick any date they want in determining when future contract years will void. It could be two days after the Super Bowl or two days before free agency begins, or anywhere in-between. Most teams have preferred to schedule these void triggers shortly after the Super Bowl, giving them time to evaluate the player’s season and decide whether they should be part of their long-term plans.

Putting the trigger date there also places it before the franchise tag window opens. That benefits the team in case this is a player they badly want to retain, keeping the franchise tag (and the transition tag, which works similarly but only brings right of first refusal to another team’s contract offer) in play during contract negotiations.

But we’ve seen the Saints make concessions to players in scheduling the void date as late as possible — contracts with Terron Armstead and Jameis Winston both include void years for accounting purposes, and the date triggering their expiration is March 16. That’s the same day free agency kicks off, and it’s also a week after the franchise tag window slams shut. So both Armstead and Winston were given concessions that they would either re-sign with the Saints or hit the open market so they could take the best possible offer, dodging the tag altogether.

Side note: that’s also the case for Tre’Quan Smith, whose contract was restructured to add void years late in 2021 and will expire on the same date as Armstead and Winston. New Orleans was pressed for cap space late in the 2021 season with so many players on injured reserve and unavailable in COVID-19 protocols. But, to be frank, Smith wouldn’t be considered for the tag either way. He’s not getting paid the $19 million the tag is valued this year by the Saints or anyone else. We’ll write that one off as the Saints choosing to keep things simple.

But let’s take a look at which other Saints players currently have void years written into their contracts, and how that could come into play with the franchise tag down the road: