Turnovers – not refs – cost Boston Game 2 vs Dubs, but that doesn’t mean the NBA doesn’t have a problem with consistency

Reducing the penalty for technical fouls might help prevent the officiating of playoff games from being the conversation.

“It’s the NBA Finals,” said Golden State Warriors forward Draymond Green via ESPN’s Malika Andrews after helping his Dubs rattle the Boston Celtics into committing 18 turnovers on the way to a 107-88 blowout win. “I wear my badge of honor,” he added, referring to how he was called by the referees in his efforts to help force those turnovers.”

“It’s not that I’m saying they necessarily treat me different — I’ve earned differential treatment. I enjoy that. I embrace that,” added Green. It’s safe to say that the Celtics he faced and their fans did not share that sentiment, taking issue in particular with how Green was allowed to seemingly tackle Grant Williams or instigate Jaylen Brown seemingly without consequence.

That the broadcast’s refereeing analyst Steve Javie openly admitted that referees treat some players differently than others based on whether they’d already received a technical foul during the broadcast likely did not help that impression.

The NBA has a postseason officiating problem – and it’s probably more complex than you think

Consistency and transparency will help.

If you ask the fans who watched Game 3 of the series between the Boston Celtics and Milwaukee Bucks on Saturday, more than a few of them would likely say they had a bone to pick with how the game was officiated.

Not just Celtics fans, either — or even media who cover the team or the coaching staff or front office members who look at these games with a trained eye. No matter which way you slice it, the game had major officiating problems, with the NBA’s Last Two Minute Report for the game noting a total of FIVE incorrect calls or non-calls in a critical contest that went down to the final buzzer to be decided.

And it wasn’t just this game that there were problems with.

Who deserves more blame for Boston’s Game 3 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks – the Celtics or the refs?

The officiating was just one thing that went sideways in this contest.

Who deserves more blame for the Boston Celtics’ Game 3 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks in their Eastern Conference semifinals series — the team itself, or the refs who made a number of questionable calls against the Celtics late in the game?

On one hand, it is hard not to get upset about the missed obvious 3-point attempt foul call from veteran point guard Marcus Smart late in the game, or a seemingly clear goaltending call gotten away with by Milwaukee superstar forward Giannis Antetokounmpo. But on the other, it certainly wasn’t the refs holding star Boston swingman Jayson Tatum to just 10 points, nor baiting he and Smart into shooting a combined 10-of-25 from the field with just 5 assists between them.

The host of the NBC Sports Boston “Celtics Beat” podcast Chris Forsberg linked up with NBC Sports Boston sideline reporter Abby Chin after the dust settled on the 103-101 Game 3 loss to talk this particular point over.

Check out the clip embedded above to hear their takes on what went wrong — and how the Celtics can be better moving forward.

This post originally appeared on Celtics Wire. Follow us on Facebook!

[mm-video type=video id=01g2dpe55smwpe4z924q playlist_id=01eqbzegwgnrje4tv2 player_id=01eqbvq570kgj8vfs7 image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01g2dpe55smwpe4z924q/01g2dpe55smwpe4z924q-a73369432ca79c50c5a6a4db6441d2e1.jpg]

[lawrence-related id=102221,102202,102217,102176]

[listicle id=102219]

[vertical-gallery id=102205]

[listicle id=102135]

College football news: fake injuries here to stay for 2022 season

What would you do to fix this obvious college football problem?

What does college football have in common with men’s international soccer?

Fake injuries.  And a lot of them.

Whether you’re a fan of a team from the SEC, Big Ten, ACC, and independent, or a fan of a squad from a Group of Five conference chances are extremely high that you’ve seen your team have a fake injury pulled on them and that your favorite squad has faked an injury on someone else.

Well, that won’t be going away anytime soon.  At least not for the 2022 college football season.

The NCAA Football Rules Committee issued the following statement on Friday:

To address teams that are awarded an injury timeout through deceptive actions, the committee proposed a reporting and investigation process. Schools and conferences would be able to report questionable scenarios to the national coordinator of officials, who will review and provide feedback to the conference for further action. Any penalties levied would be up to the conference office or school involved.

“It is very difficult to legislate ethics, particularly when an injury timeout is being used to gain an advantage,” David Shaw said. “The small number of teams that seem to use these tactics should be addressed directly.”  

The committee considered several in-game options to address this, including altering the injury timeout rule to remove the injured student-athlete for more than one play, which is the current rule. This concept was debated at length, but the committee was concerned with the additional issues that could be created and did not want to encourage players to continue to participate when injured.

Committee members discussed how the pace of play appears to be contributing to this concern. “We considered all options to address this issue, including allowing both teams an opportunity to substitute after a first down,” David Shaw said. “This is another step to consider in the future.”

So there won’t be a penalty during the actual game but perhaps your program will be penalized in the days after.  Sure, that will get the problem to go away.

Just like fining athletic departments gets fans to stop rushing the field, right?

I don’t have the right answer in how to fix the faking of injuries but anyone who watches college football sees it on the regular and to anyone with an ounce of competitive spirit, they’re angered by the acts.  However, it appears those acts will be here to stay for at least 2022 and likely beyond.

Related:

Happy birthday to college football legend Knute Rockne

Game-by-game predictions for Notre Dame football in 2022

Bills and Jets players couldn’t believe it as the ref needed three attempts at coin toss

Just … wow.

When it comes to being an NFL official, it’s sometimes easy to overlook just how difficult of a job it is. They have to actively enforce thousands of rules while standing in the middle of a professional football game at full speed. It isn’t easy! And mistakes happen.

That being said, the coin toss should be the easiest thing an NFL referee is tasked with doing. You literally just have to flip a coin. And still, NFL refs manage to screw that up from time to time.

Week 18’s game between the Buffalo Bills and New York Jets was no exception. Longtime NFL official John Hussey struggled out there for the pregame toss, which had the players laughing in disbelief.

NFL Films shared the hilarious exchange from Sunday’s game. The Jets had called tails, the coin landed on tails and Hussey was ready to award the Jets with the choice until the Bills spoke up.

The coin didn’t flip.

Hussey realized that the Bills were right, so he re-flipped. And guess what? It didn’t flip … again.

The Bills couldn’t believe it. It took three attempts, and the Jets managed to win the “toss” all three times. Hey, at least this didn’t happen ahead of overtime for the Chargers-Raiders game. That would have been something.

Hussey will have to practice those coin flips going forward. It’s supposed to be easy.

[mm-video type=video id=01fs1b3ps3bmhybpjmxe playlist_id=01f09m93q11d4tbgfy player_id=none image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01fs1b3ps3bmhybpjmxe/01fs1b3ps3bmhybpjmxe-4e89f7a1b7fd8e67760c83b0480e6e38.jpg]

Brian Kelly still not pleased with officials from Saturday

What was the worst call or non-call on Saturday?

Leading 24-13 with just over five minutes to play on Saturday, Notre Dame was forced to punt as Wisconsin tried to keep hope alive.  On that punt that was fair caught at the Wisconsin 14 yard line, Brian Kelly was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct, a 15-yard penalty that moved the Badgers up to the 29.

Two days after the game and play, Kelly still wasn’t pleased with the officials call.

“Yeah, we had it pretty clear. When two guys take a run at somebody, I guess that’s not targeting somebody I guess. But if you try to stop somebody from going in the end zone, that’s targeting. We just don’t have it right yet. Your eyes should tell you what’s going on in the game, but sometimes we hide behind the rulebook. It just wasn’t officiated in the manner that I thought it should have been. So, they thought that because I went three feet out on the field, that I should get a flag for them not officiating it correctly.”

I’ve wanted to see the actual incident he refers to with Hamilton but am yet to be able to find the clip online.  These are the kind of things that make players like to play for a certain coach though, when that coach goes to bat for a wrongdoing and then continues to do so.

Related:

Notre Dame releases depth chart for test with No. 7 Cincinnati

Notre Dame dominates fourth quarter vs. Wisconsin:  5 Instant Takeaways

Notre Dame’s all-time winningest football coaches

Best photos from Notre Dame’s 41-13 win over Wisconsin

Chiefs fans were absolutely furious at the refs after questionable calls led to a Bucs touchdown

It hasn’t been great.

The Kansas City Chiefs are no strangers to playing from behind in postseason games. Last year, they mounted double-digit comebacks in every game en route to the Super Bowl title. They’ve been in this situation before.

But Sunday’s Super Bowl LV matchup against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers had the Chiefs especially frustrated with the officiating. And for good reason.

The Buccaneers went into the locker room up 21-6 at halftime after a pair of defensive pass interference penalties set up an Antonio Brown touchdown just before half.

The first call — a 34-yard penalty — appeared to be incidental contact, at most, on a pass that Mike Evans wasn’t going to reach.

The second pass interference call occurred in the end zone on Tyrann Mathieu, which was a questionable penalty as well. Mathieu was visibly upset on the bench over the call.

The calls had Chiefs fans (and most viewers at home) upset with how involved the officials have made themselves in this game. The Bucs were only called for one penalty for five yards in the first half. The Chiefs, on the other hand, were called for eight penalties for 95 yards.

[jwplayer Q2ejkcSI-q2aasYxh]

On double-overtime, no-calls and the high road to a Game 7 win

The Boston Celtics reacted to the officiating — and the lack of it — in Game 6 in some very different ways.

“I just missed a layup, I guess.”

That was as much as anyone could get Boston Celtics star point guard Kemba Walker ot say about the officiating in Wednesday’s Game 6 loss to the Toronto Raptors.

In a game marred by questionable officiating at several points — ranging from probably-solid airspace fouls and players getting technicals for incidental contact with players behind them to egregious non-calls like the one Walker alluded to — one incident in particular stuck out.

Nick Nurse, on the court, in live-game action.

Boston All-Star swingman may have even passed to him, thinking it was a Celtic camped in the corner looking for the open shot.

“Yeah, I turned it over — that was my fault. I can’t blame Nick Nurse — he’s not playing,” graciously replied the rising star when asked about that sequence.

“I had no idea,” echoed head coach Brad Stevens. “I wasn’t paying as much attention to that; I’m just worried about when we can control.”

Asked if he’d had any thoughts about it the next day, and the Indiana native had even less to say.

“Nope.”

Outspoken as always — and crafted in a way to complain without the risk of incurring the fining capacity of the league for criticizing the officiating — likely the source of at least some of the other Celtics’ silence — Jaylen Brown had some very thinly-veiled criticism of the Toronto head coach.

“As a respectable organization I expect them to act accordingly,” he suggested when asked about related late-game chirping.

“Things seem to get out of hand at times from coaching staffs. Let’s keep it under control. Let’s keep playing basketball”

Pressed about that reply, Brown elaborated.

“I think a lot of emotions [are] very intense and things like that and sometimes things seem to go overboard at times,” he said.

“Let’s keep it in check, let’s keep it respectable. And let’s keep playing basketball. Grown men should be able to control themselves, especially coaching staff. So, let’s continue to do all we’ve got to do play basketball and be ready to fight.”

Stevens emphasized the importance of saying focused on what can be controlled as he often does, and as frustrating as this loss was, it’s probably the wisest move.

“You move on and control what you can control,” offered the Celtics coach.

“We’ve got to do better, obviously, and this number of possessions, but they were really playing … it was [a] great basketball game.”

Even with the officiating looking as bad as some fans often complaining about, there is a kernel of truth in the old adage that the team shouldn’t have let things get to that point in the first place.

Not that anyone wants to hear that today.

“Throw some ice on your legs,” said Stevens. “Get ready for Friday.”

[jwplayer skRZNpss]

[lawrence-related id=41598,41593,41582,41575]

Seahawks (and Saints) fans were furious over blatant missed pass interference against 49ers

The Seahawks should have had first and goal on the 1-yard line, but the refs missed a blatant pass interference call against the 49ers.

The Seahawks were trailing the 49ers by five points on Sunday night, and driving with less than two minutes remaining in the fourth quarter. With the ball at the SF 12-yard line and 55 seconds remaining in the game, Russell Wilson fired a throw to tight end Jacob Hollister in the end zone.

Hollister was unable to even make an attempt to catch the ball, however, because 49ers linebacker Fred Warner mugged him in the end zone. Everyone waited for the flag to be thrown at Warner’s feet for pass interference, but nothing happened. No flag was thrown.

As there were fewer than two minutes remaining in the game, Seahawks head coach Pete Carroll was not allowed to challenge the call. HOWEVER, the league does have rules in place now where the league office can choose to review the play if they feel blatant PI occurred.

That … didn’t happen. For some reason. Seattle even called timeout after the play to give the league office time to review the decision, and … they didn’t. Nothing happened. Or they did quickly and decided not to do anything.

The call had massive repercussions. The Seahawks (thanks in part to some boneheaded coaching from Carroll) would go on to lose the game by five points.

That loss gave the 49ers the No. 1 seed in the NFC, and knocked the Saints out of a first-round bye in the process.

So now you had furious Seahawks fans, AND furious Saints fans who felt that had been cheated by another terrible, missed pass interference call.

As to how bad the call was? Well, yeah, it was pretty bad.

[lawrence-related id=882343,882297,882312]

[jwplayer sFZXtMte-q2aasYxh]

Draymond Green accused the Blazers of ‘cheating the game,’ but he should be mad at the refs

Draymond Green was (correctly) called out for taking too long to sub into Warriors-Blazers, and then tried to make it about the Blazers.

Draymond Green attempted to sub into the Warriors-Blazers game on Wednesday, with 5:22 remaining in the fourth quarter. He went to the scorer’s table, and then took his time.

He was still in his warmups. He had heating pads on his knees. After 13 seconds, Trail Blazers assistant coach Jim Moran yelled to referees: “Hey, how much time does he get? How much time does he get?”

The refs understood the question, and put the kibosh on the substitution. Green would have to wait until the next opportunity to check into the game. That was nearly a minute later — Green eventually subbed in for Omari Spellman with 4:35 left in the game.

Green was apoplectic, and continued to be apoplectic after the game, which the Warriors lost, 122-112. Green accused the Blazers of “cheating the game” by asking refs for a delay of game call.

The Blazers didn’t cheat, though. They just asked the rules to be enforced. The NBA is desperately trying to improve its in-game product, and a common complaint from NBA fans is that fourth quarters can get so bogged down in timeouts, substitutions, and free throws, it makes it tough to watch.

So they put a limit on things. Yahoo pulled the rule:

RULE NO 3: Players, Substitutes and Coaches Section 5, article C: A substitute must be ready to enter the game when beckoned. No delays for removal of warm-up clothing will be permitted.

Pretty cut and dry. Green was in warm-ups and wearing heating pads on his knees. He wasn’t ready to enter the game.

So now, the Blazers didn’t cheat anything. They asked the rule to be enforced, and it was.

Where Green has a point, however, is that opposing coaches and players seem to be awfully particular about when they’re calling out these rule violations. The Blazers waited until the fourth quarter of a close game — the score was 107-102 at the time — to demand the rule be called.

It reminds me of Chris Paul calling out Jordan Bell for having his jersey untucked in a game between the Thunder and the Timberwolves, which he did with … 1.1 seconds remaining in the fourth quarter of a three-point game.

Paul, like the Blazers assistant, was correct about the rule. However, refs have to have some discretion here. Paul hadn’t cared much about jerseys being tucked in or out until a second remained in the fourth quarter. The Blazers coaches weren’t counting off seconds on substitutions until one of the Warriors’ best players tried to check in to a tight game in the fourth.

Green was mad at the Blazers … but he should be mad at the refs.

If the rules are there, the refs need to enforce them from the start of the game. And if the refs aren’t enforcing them all game, they can’t just suddenly start enforcing them when an opponent realizes it would be hugely in his team’s favor for the rule to be called.

The refs might look bad, but I’d argue they have to swallow the whistle there. You can’t change how you’re calling a game when one team decides it. Then you’re not calling the game; they are.

[lawrence-related id=879028,876529,872265]

[jwplayer iHZqI0wL-q2aasYxh]