Chiefs HC Andy Reid shares final thoughts on officiating before Super Bowl LIX: ‘They’re doing their job’

Kansas City #Chiefs head coach Andy Reid shares final thoughts on officiating before Super Bowl LIX: ‘They’re doing their job’ | @EdEastonJr

Thursday was the last press conference media day before the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles played in Super Bowl LIX. Chiefs head coach Andy Reid was once again questioned about rumors that game officials showed preferential treatment to Kansas City.

“They don’t favor one side for the other,” said Reid. “That’s not how this thing goes.” I don’t think the officials care about what’s said; they’re doing their job, and they’re doing it to the best of their ability. They don’t favor one side or the other; that’s not how this thing goes.”

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell shot down assumptions that game referees favored the Chiefs during his Super Bowl press conference earlier in the week. Reid wanted to ensure he emphasized what his team had echoed going into Sunday’s game.

“It’s a good story, but that’s not the reality of how it works. You’d be insulting them to think that’s what they do,” said Reid. “They go out, and they call it like they see it. There’s some, as a coach, I sit there and go, ‘I don’t agree with it.’ There are some I agree with. That’s how it goes.”

The Chiefs won eleven games by one-score margins during the regular season and were the top seed in the AFC playoffs. A third consecutive Super Bowl victory this Sunday will silence the critics.

Commissioner Roger Goodell addresses rumors about Chiefs, favoritism from officials

Commissioner Roger Goodell addresses the Kansas City #Chiefs rumors of favoritism from officials | @EdEastonJr

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell held his annual Super Bowl press conference on Monday ahead of the Kansas City Chiefs’ championship matchup against the Philadelphia Eagles this weekend.

While Goodell covered many topics during his comments to the media, perhaps the most surprising subject he touched on was the baseless conspiracy brewing online that involves the Chiefs and the NFL’s officials.

Goodell was asked by the pool of reporters about the constant bellyaching about the league’s referees and calls for or against Kansas City this season.

Jokingly, Goodell compared it to an infamous rumor spread by former Houston Texans running back Arian Foster, which became the premise of a comedic commercial titled “The Table Read”, which posited that the league operates with a script.

“This reminds me of the script for the entire season. I think a lot of those theories are things that happen in social media, and they get a new life,” Goodell explained. “As you say, it’s not your theory, but out there. Nobody wants it to be their theory, and so I understand that. I think it reflects a lot of the fans’ fashion.” said Goodell. “I think it also is a reminder for us how important officiating is. And I think the men and women that officiate the NFL are outstanding. They have the highest possible standards.”

Former players and fans have often expressed their displeasure with game officials coincidentally during Chiefs games this season. Andy Reid, Patrick Mahomes, and many team personnel have been forced to address the criticism, and now the commissioner is discussing it before Super Bowl LIX.

“It’s a ridiculous theory for anyone who might take it seriously, but at the end of the day, it’s something we always have to continue to work on,” said Goodell. “How do we make our officiating better at all times? And if you look at the Chief’s record, which I think is an amazing thing, people talk about the competitors in our league, the Chiefs, with their 15 wins, 15 and two this year, 11 of those 15 games were within one score. And I think that talks about the competitiveness of our game and the importance of how we officiate it, but also both the competitiveness of how we played it.”

Goodell played down the criticism, but it is alarming that the topic is being carried into the biggest game of the year, focusing too much on the officials rather than the actual game.

OPINION: Cartoons, Rorschach tests, and interpretations that fall ‘Just Short…’

The story of how a cartoon led one writer to an illuminating conclusion about a narrative regarding the Kansas City #Chiefs and NFL officials.

A tiresome narrative about the Kansas City Chiefs and NFL officials reached a tipping point this week when Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Adam Zyglis published an illustration captioned “Just Short…” in the Buffalo News.

Zyglis’ cartoon (which we’ll refer to as “Just Short…” from here out) depicts his from-the-hip reaction to the Bills’ defeat at the hands of Kansas City in the AFC Championship Game on Sunday.

‘Just Short…’ made the rounds on social media after Buffalo’s season ended in the AFC championship game, and constituted the first time I had seen a mainstream media outlet run a story (or, I guess, cartoon) that seemed to reinforce the idea that the Chiefs were getting preferential treatment from the NFL’s officials.

On Tuesday, Zyglis posted a picture of “Just Short…” to his official Twitter account with a message that read “Interference… #NFLReferees”:

“Just Short…” features a bound blue buffalo with gritted teeth (ostensibly a stand-in for star quarterback Josh Allen on a memorable failed fourth-down conversion) struggling to run from left to right while the immaculately drawn hand of a referee holds it back on a red leash, which becomes the distinctive stripe in the Bills’ logo.

The chain crew (not pictured) holds its boxy down marker perfectly upright on the near sideline, and it shows that the action is taking place on fourth down.

The forward rod (or “stick,” which shows the line to gain) is tilted slightly to the right — away from the Bills logo, which has its head held over a singular yellow-and-white line on the field.

None of the Chiefs’ defenders are included in Zyglis’ illustration, and the Bills logo is not holding a ball in its canonically swept-back forelegs, which are well short of the line to gain.

I was appalled to see that a Zyglis’ cartoon had made it to print because, on its face, the premise of “Just Short…” — that officials had exercised undue influence to alter the final score of the AFC Championship Game, or otherwise played a role in Kansas City’s recent dominance — has been roundly dismissed by every serious sports outlet.

Now, Zyglis’ medium and mine are completely different. I have never had a particularly keen eye for visual art, or an ability to draw better than about a fourth-grade level, and I’m not the most insightful fellow on the planet.

As a result of these known inadequacies, I had a feeling that maybe I was missing an ironic angle that would be difficult for me to replicate here in the written word (despite my attempt at doing so above) given that Chiefs Wire’s usual quick-and-to-the-point style doesn’t leave much room for protracted prose.

Perhaps, I thought, Zyglis somehow meant to poke fun at the idea that the officials unilaterally swung the AFC Championship Game against Buffalo, and maybe any “joke” he was making just didn’t land for me as a Chiefs fan who is — admittedly — a bit sensitive to the seemingly constant minimization of Kansas City’s achievements that has been taking place on social media lately.

Or, I figured that maybe Zyglis is just a broken-hearted Bills fan who, at the time he sat down to draw “Just Short…”, was more inclined to believe in a grand conspiracy rather than admit his favorite team took a bad loss to a good opponent in a big game without any sort of collusion from a higher power.

We’ve all been there.

So, I reached out to Zyglis directly and was graciously given the chance to interview him about “Just Short…” in an effort to better understand the machinations of a mind that appeared to have embraced the demonstrably false narratives about the Chiefs and NFL officials.

What I found — predictably — was that Zyglis is a master of his craft who is far more eloquent in his preferred form of expression than I could ever hope to be in mine.

When asked about the inception of “Just Short…” Zyglis made it clear that the illustration wasn’t drawn with one play or call in mind.

“My goal is to summarize the biggest takeaway from the game with a strong visual metaphor,” Zyglis explained. “This cartoon was inspired by the series of controversial calls by the refs that held the Bills back at times from getting the edge in an extremely close game. As with any narrow loss, there are many reasons why the Bills didn’t win, from missed opportunities to coaching to a critical defensive injury. In the end, they didn’t find a way. But with two teams so evenly matched, a handful of bad calls at critical times can make a huge difference in the outcome.

“The call that best encapsulated the referee controversy was the ball spot on the fourth-and-1 sequence. In fact, many viewers thought the Bills got the first down the play before. I chose this as the metaphor in the cartoon because it was both the most consequential and the most egregious of the game, with the Bills pushing late to go up by eight points. Referees make mistakes on the field, being human, but the fact that it was reviewed and upheld added fuel to the fire.”

Though the degree to which the officials’ (perceived) errors contributed to the game’s final result is debatable, Zyglis made a point to stop well short of saying that he thinks there was willful or coordinated misconduct by officials that unduly benefited Kansas City or directly prevented Buffalo from winning.

“I wouldn’t argue that the refs were intentionally trying to hinder the Bills – you could never prove that,” Zyglis clarified. “I was simply saying from a practical sense, that key referee decisions and failures held the Bills back in a close game. Intentional or not, two key bad calls were reviewable and upheld. That’s not acceptable with the amount of money in this league and with a ticket to the Super Bowl on the line.”

Regardless of Zyglis’ intent, users on social media took his cartoon and ran with it. Controversial ex-Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown shared a picture of “Just Short…” with his followers on Wednesday, catapulting the illustration into the NFL discourse online.

“The cartoon really took off on X and Instagram,” Zyglis said. “It had over 40,000 likes with former NFL players retweeting it. It really tapped into an undercurrent that has been brewing all year of this distrust of the integrity of NFL games, especially with games involving the Chiefs. In my career I have never seen such a negative national response to the refereeing of a game. With fans fed up with suspicious calls all year, and ‘Chiefs fatigue’ setting in, the cartoon became ripe for the moment. It started as a cartoon for Bills fans and it resonated with a national audience.”

But what if Buffalo had won the AFC Championship Game? Had the matchup ended differently, would the calls against the Bills have warranted an artful outcry?

“In that hypothetical scenario, those bad calls would have not carried the same consequence, so no, I wouldn’t have likely drawn a cartoon on them,” Zyglis conceded. “The loss, and the fact that the game could have gone either way, magnified the calls.”

As it turns out, Zyglis’ decision to leave Kansas City’s defenders — and the ball — out of “Just Short…” was no mistake, nor was the work’s caption just a glib cliché.

“I intentionally left out the Chiefs and the ball because I wanted to show that these bad calls held the team back from progressing,” Zyglis explained. “I wanted to make it bigger than the one play and not about the Chiefs (as good as they did play). The irony of the caption ‘Just Short’ is that the replays suggest they weren’t actually short on that fourth down conversion. It was a way to also suggest Bills fans are proud of the season and the effort they put in. They didn’t fall short in our eyes. Even with the loss they exceeded everyone’s expectations.”

And you know what? I can live with that.

In my initial reaction to “Just Short…”, I failed to consider that Zyglis’ drawing had — in fact — nothing to do with the Chiefs at all, which should have been obvious given that he didn’t depict any of Kansas City’s players in his illustration.

Instead, with a little bit of context, ‘Just Short…’ becomes a poignant truth-telling of a Sisyphean struggle undertaken each year by the Bills and their supporters that was merely co-opted by an all-too-familiar class of online misanthropes who are always eager to add fodder to any unfounded claim they can find an audience for.

What some viewers (like me) saw as a desperate diminishing of undeniably impressive athletic accomplishment by the Chiefs — and others as a lightning rod for a baseless conspiracy — was intended to be neither.

I think the story of “Just Short…” speaks to a moment we’ve found ourselves in as Americans, if not more broadly as humans.

We live in a culture that rewards polarizing rhetoric — both in our online and “meat-space” interactions — and tends to divide folks into competing factions more often than it serves to foster any kind of understanding between people or a civil means of holding differing (but equally valid) perspectives in polite conversation.

As someone who watched his favorite quarterbacks (first Alex Smith, then Patrick Mahomes) struggle for playoff relevance against Tom Brady and the New England Patriots in the mid-to-late 2010s, I can absolutely empathize with Zyglis’ frustration over a few crucial judgment calls, even if I disagree with the notion that they materially altered the outcome of Sunday’s game.

By that same token, I can recognize that Zyglis didn’t draw “Just Short…” in service of a phony narrative about Kansas City and its relationship to officials, as I had initially thought.

Rather, because of my own defensive instinct, I had completely missed Zyglis’ core observation about Buffalo’s enduring quest to win its first Super Bowl, and the tribulations of Bills fans who want nothing more than to see their favorite team succeed in the face of ever-more intense adversity each season.

At its core, “Just Short…” is a Rorschach test for fans across the country who are either content to smell the flowers of the Chiefs’ budding dynasty or anxiously waiting for Kansas City’s run of dominance to wither so other teams can get their chance to earn a ring.

As with any piece of art, “Just Short…” opens itself up to interpretation, even though its message may seem clear at first glance.

Joe Burrow breaks silence on late hits, facemasks vs. Ravens

Bengals QB Joe Burrow faced questions about late hits and facemasks after Week 10.

Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow, as most fans know by now, isn’t one of those passers always looking at referees for a flag.

But maybe he should be.

Burrow was mauled during Thursday night’s Week 10 loss to the Baltimore Ravens, suffering at least one late hit that should’ve drawn a flag. He also suffered two could-be facemask penalties on the final drive, including on the two-point attempt, to the point even Skip Bayless was raging after the fact.

Asked about this stuff after the game, though, Burrow said he understands that officials aren’t usually calling facemask penalties in those clutch situations.

“You’re not getting that call in that situation, for the most part,” Burrow said, according to Fox 19’s Joe Danneman.

And on the topic of late hits, via Danneman: “I’ve never really gotten those calls. You don’t expect to get those.”

Fair enough, but maybe he should. And Bengals fans would probably argue after Thursday night that Burrow should complain a little more, like similar elite quarterbacks, and that the facemask flags should probably fly if it’s so obvious.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1]

NFL employing ball optical tracking in hopes of season implementation

The NFL is adopting ball optical tracking software signaling a potential technological shift in modern football

The NFL is poised to make a significant technological leap by introducing ball optical tracking during the preseason, with plans to potentially implement the system for the 2024 season.

In March, the NFL competition committee greenlit the use of optical tracking for preseason games. Test runs were conducted at several venues, including Hard Rock Stadium, MetLife Stadium, and Super Bowl LVIII in Las Vegas.

This move has been long anticipated, given the technology’s success in sports like tennis and soccer, as well as its current use in the UFL. While the traditional chain gang will remain as a backup, the introduction of optical tracking aims to eliminate potential human error and outdated measurement methods, such as the infamous index card.

The preseason will offer a glimpse into how well the new system performs. If successful, its full-scale adoption across all stadiums could mark a significant transformation in the modern NFL.

Lions draw controversial referee for NFC Championship against the 49ers

Detroit Lions play against the San Francisco 49ers in the NFC Championship, where they will have a ref who they bad history with in the past

The Detroit Lions secured a decisive victory against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, earning their ticket to the NFC Championship where they are set to face the perennial powerhouse San Francisco 49ers. As the stage is set for this crucial matchup, the referee assignments have been announced, and unfortunately for the Lions, they find themselves under the oversight of Clete Blakeman, a referee with a troubled history in Detroit.

Clete Blakeman has been entrusted with refereeing duties for the NFC Championship, prompting disappointment among Lions fans. The mere mention of Blakeman brings back memories of the 2019 debacle when the Lions appeared on the verge of defeating the Green Bay Packers on Monday Night, only to be thwarted by a series of controversial calls, resulting in a heartbreaking 23-22 loss and almost ensuring the NFC North title for the Packers.

While the Lions had Blakeman as a referee earlier in the season during their matchup against the Las Vegas Raiders, there were no significant issues reported. However, an incident where he waved off a holding call from an umpire raised concerns about his attentiveness to his officiating responsibilities.

Despite Blakeman having one of the lowest totals for flags thrown (220), he has dismissed 45 of those calls, tying for the highest dismissal rate among officiating crews. Recent history includes the memorable flag-heavy game between the Seattle Seahawks and Dallas Cowboys, where flags seemed to fly every 30 seconds, with many being picked up later.

In the playoffs, officiating crews vary from the regular season, introducing an element of unpredictability. However, convincing Lions fans to overlook Blakeman’s contentious history with the team may prove challenging. As the NFC Championship game approaches, all eyes will be on how officiating unfolds, with the shadow of past grievances lingering in the background.

NFL sends out video to teams proving referee Brad Allen screwed up the Lions-Cowboys game

NFL sends out video to teams proving referee Brad Allen screwed up the Lions-Cowboys game

By now, we all know that the Lions executed a two-point conversion successfully against the Cowboys in the closing seconds of their game last Saturday. Despite celebrating after the play call, the Lions were quickly reminded why they’re scapegoat of the league.

In this instance, NFL referee Brad Allen and his crew changed the ruling on the field and marked Lions offensive tackle Taylor Decker ineligible. In their ruling, they had stated that Decker didn’t report as eligible and instead, it was Lions offensive lineman Dan Skipper that reported as eligible. They even communicated that Skipper was ruled eligible.

However, there’s been photos and video evidence circulating that the Lions did everything right. Instead, it looks like Brad Allen and his team made a mistake. Despite communication before the game from Dan Campbell to the referees about a potential trick play or two, this two-point play was just assumed to be marked with Decker as ineligible.

Yesterday, Mike Garafolo of the NFL Network posted about communication that was sent from the NFL to head coaches and general managers. This communication was a video centered on the controversial finish between the Lions and the Cowboys.

Looking at the evidence the last several days, it’s becoming laughable at the little credibility being taken by the NFL and the officials after the outcome of this game. So since they simply want to blame the Lions, let’s review the evidence and talk this one out.

Going to the first quarter between the Cowboys and the Lions, you can clearly see Dan Skipper coming onto the field. While he’s coming onto the field, you can see wide receiver (No. 8) Josh Reynolds preparing to run off the field.

In the process, it appears to me that Dan Skipper isn’t checking into the game as eligible or ineligible. Instead, he’s indicating some type of strong or heavy package for the offense with how he’s flexing his left arm. Meanwhile, the head official, Brad Allen has his back to Skipper and just about the entire Lions offense.

To ensure we’re not losing our minds, the play above is what was called by Detroit for the 12:50 check-in from Dan Skipper. The Lions come out in their ’12’ personnel (one running back and two tight ends) but with Skipper playing as a tight end rather than an offensive lineman, it would be signaled as some type of “heavy” formation or personnel. That’s what it appeared to be in the picture from the NFL and when you watch the play, it appears to be just that.

The Lions run some type of Duo concept. The right guard and center combo block the defensive tackle that is heads up over the right guard and is aligned in a 2-technique. This play is designed for the running back to read the inside linebacker so he can bend, bang or bounce the run.

While the play wasn’t successful and was defended well by the Cowboys, it just goes to show that Skipper was the last man on the line-of-scrimmage (LOS). Tight end Sam LaPorta is off-the-line but both players are technically eligible to run routes. However, the photo and All-22 clip is just some of the evidence showing what the Lions did on that particular play.

Lastly, here’s the next example used by the NFL. It’s one of the final plays of the game and it’s the two-point play that the Lions used. Looking at the image above, we can see the exact same motion from Dan Skipper as he’s highlighted.

He’s jogging onto the field and is flexing his left arm. Again, that appears to be a signal for a “heavy” package. Just like the previous image, a wide receiver comes off the field. On the play above, it’s not Reynolds coming off the field but instead, it’s Kalif Raymond.

Additionally, I want you to look at referee Brad Allen on the far right of the picture. He’s looking at a group of Lions players and if you look close enough, you can see Lions offensive tackle Taylor Decker staring at Allen. Seconds later, not only is Taylor Decker giving the signal to Allen but Dan Skipper and Penei Sewell are all present for this exchange to Allen. Why is that important?

According to the video released by the NFL, their rule is stated as the following, “clearly communicated to the referee by both a physical signal up and down his chest and to report to the referee his intention to report as an eligible receiver.”

My questions are simple. For starters, what else is Decker, Skipper and Sewell supposed to do? They’ve all played the tackle-eligible roles for the Lions in their career. Decker has caught two touchdowns in his career in the exact same role and position he played against the Cowboys. Last season, Sewell caught a nine-yard pass against the Vikings and Skipper has played all over for the Lions on offense. 

Next, can we just make these referees full-time employees? It’s a billion dollar industry being ran like it’s a Dollar General. There’s 16 games a week with 7 officials per game, not per team but per game. Pay them accordingly and be done with this foolishness.

Lastly, can we stop using the Lions as the examples of the league? I know that Brad Allen reported “number 70 as eligible” but it’s quite clear he made a mistake. We all make mistakes but how is a mistake like this acceptable? Especially with all this technology we have for sports today. We can cut to a hundred commercials in a game and put cameras in the pylons but we can’t pull the audio from a referee that’s wearing a microphone the entire game?

Changes won’t be made this season but moving forward, they will. There will be changes made to support everyone else but for now, the Lions and their fan base have to live with the reality of “what if” as their potential reign towards the top of the NFC could be blemished by controversy.

The NFL’s Worst of Week 6: Bad officiating, punter headbutts, angry Brian Daboll!

Massive officiating errors! Angry coaches! Punters starting fights, and announcers jinxing quarterbacks. It’s the NFL’s Worst of the Week for Week 6!

Football is a wonderful, thrilling, inspiring game that can lift us to new heights in our lives.

But football is also a weird, inexplicable, at times downright stupid game that may force you to perform Keith Moon-level furniture destruction in your own living room.

So, as much as we at Touchdown Wire endeavor to write about what makes the game great, there are also times when it’s important to point out the dumb plays, boneheaded decisions, and officiating errors that make football all too human.

Folks, it’s time for the Worst of the Week for Week 6 of the 2023 NFL season.

Richard Sherman disappointed by officiating during Championship weekend

Seahawks great Richard Sherman was one of many people who were disappointed in the officials in both games.

Championship weekend was a bit of a let-down. The NFC title game turned out to be a blowout thanks in part to the 49ers having to play their fifth-string QB and the AFC Championship was tainted by some missed calls.

Seahawks great Richard Sherman was one of many people who were disappointed in the officials in both games.

Worst of all, Ron Torbert’s crew missed an egregious hold on the deciding play of the game between the Bengals and the Chiefs.

For some inspiration, they could look to the NBA, where the official referees’ account provided a good example of admitting when they made a mistake in the Lakers Celtics game.

They don’t have to flagellate themselves to this extent, but just admitting when a mistake is made would help silence the lunatics who believe the NFL is rigged and Damar Hamlin died and has been replaced by a clone.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbycpfe4qgv9nf6 player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=]

[listicle id=100001]

The NFL is now Very Concerned about officiating. What took the NFL so long?

The NFL has decided to become concerned about officiating after Week 18’s Seahawks-Rams game. We say, what took the NFL so long?

Several big-time shot-callers in the NFL are now Very Concerned about the state of officiating in the league based on the performance of Craig Wrolstad’s crew in Week 18’s game between the Los Angeles Rams and the Seattle Seahawks. Seattle won that game 19-16 in overtime, and the result put the Seahawks in the playoffs, knocking the Detroit Lions out even before Detroit’s Sunday night game against the Green Bay Packers.

Multiple executives and coaches told ESPN’s Adam Schefter that the officiating had several lapses, all in Seattle’s favor, and all key elements in Seattle’s eventual win.

One anonymous source said that it was “The worst officiated game of the year.”

Schefter wrote that it wasn’t just the Rams and the Lions who were upset by the officiating in this particular game — the NFL’s Competition Committee also stood up and took notice.

From Schefter’s report:

One source told ESPN this week that the NFL must do a better job of screening, hiring and training its officials; the league can’t have games in which teams’ seasons are on the line and have questionable and impactful calls such as the ones in the Rams-Seahawks Week 18 game.

Officiating is an imperfect science, but the source said to ESPN that there should be ways to mitigate those types of mistakes.

All true, but where has this outrage been all season? NFL officiating has been a major problem all along, and Week 18 wasn’t the worst week. Not even close. You can go back to Week 15, when multiple crews blew multiple calls that affected games to various degrees.

The worst officiating moments from a NFL Week 15 that was full of them

There were the two fumble recovery touchdowns by Minnesota Vikings cornerback Chandon Sullivan that were called back — the only reason those didn’t affect Minnesota’s eventual win over the Indianapolis Colts is that the Vikings performed the greatest comeback win in NFL history.

There was the touchdown pass from Las Vegas Raiders quarterback Derek Carr to receiver Keelan Cole late in the Raiders’ game against the New England Patriots that shouldn’t have been a touchdown upon review — Cole’s second foot went out of bounds, but the crew didn’t see sufficient evidence to overturn the touchdown call — even though there was ample evidence on the FOX television replays.

And there were the series of officiating bungles that helped the New York Giants beat the Washington Commanders — primarily an obvious and missed pass interference penalty on New York cornerback Darnay Holmes — which referee John Hussey referred to as a “judgment call.”

Talk about a series of officiating decisions that affected playoff seedings? The 9-7-1 Giants wound up with the NFC’s six-seed, while the 8-8-1 Commanders were not in the postseason. Had Washington won that game, they would have flipped records with the Giants, and as the teams’ tie game was against each other, that’s another example of officiating deciding in part who gets to play in the tournament.

We have horrible roughing the passer penalties just about every week, based on rules that are flawed by design. We have officials who are confused about which team they want to penalize. And we have a VP of Officiating in former referee Walt Anderson who tends to take over postgame pool reports, leaving the officials in question to skate without any real public accountability.

So, it’s nice that some people in the league are concerned about the state of officiating as the postseason begins. Not that it will have any effect on the quality of work this weekend and beyond, but our question is: Where has this concern been all season? Because what happened in the Seahawks-Rams game was more par for the course than any kind of outlier in performance.