Mountain West Power Rankings Week 13: Who Is No. 1?

Mountain West Power Rankings Week 13: Who Is No. 1? Cowboys at the top Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire Colorado State jumps to number two Less than one month remains until Selection Sunday, and the Mountain West looks well-positioned to send …

Mountain West Power Rankings Week 13: Who Is No. 1?


Cowboys at the top


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Colorado State jumps to number two

[mm-video type=playlist id=01fb7dafw2b08817yr player_id=none image=https://mwwire.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

Less than one month remains until Selection Sunday, and the Mountain West looks well-positioned to send four teams dancing.

1.) Wyoming – 76 points

Wyoming had another tough test facing scorching hot Utah State in Laramie on Tuesday — the game ended up heading to extra frames as Graham Ike made two free throws with 16 seconds left, and the Aggies didn’t get a shot off before the final buzzer sounded. In the extra five minutes, Ike hit a shot with two seconds left, which ended up being the game-winner. That’s a solid home win where Wyoming was only favorited by 1.5 points, as the Aggies rank favorably in all metrics. The Cowboys can’t afford losses to bottom-half Mountain West foes, and they made easy work of San Jose State 74-52, led by Ike’s 25 points, 18 rebound outing. 

Winning the two games earned Jeff Linder’s squad a spot in this week’s AP top 25 rankings, entering the poll at number 22. They head to New Mexico to face the Lobos — in a tough environment, as the PIT provides a massive home-court advantage. After that, Wyoming finishes the week returning home to host Air Force over the weekend. 

2.) Colorado State – 69 points

Colorado State won a trio of games last week, stretching their winning streak to four consecutive wins. The Rams looked well-positioned to take the road victory in Reno, with David Roddy scoring 29 points on 11-14 shooting in the double-digit win. Roddy was three rebounds and two assists shy of recording his first college triple-double as the Rams coasted to their 65-50 victory over Fresno State. Some controversy emerged on Super Bowl Sunday; no, I’m not talking about Logan Wilson’s holding call on 3rd and goal either.

Let’s set the stage, Isaiah Stevens drives to the tin, and Abu Kigab strips the ball away with around seconds remaining. Kigab was bumped by Isaiah Stevens and no there was no foul called, but an inadvertent whistle led to a 10-minute stoppage, trying to figure out what exactly happened. The game then went to overtime, where Roddy sealed the ball with an emphatic block to nix any chance of Marcus Shaver tying the game again. A 3-0 week is what the doctor ordered for the Rams to stay alive in the league’s regular-season title race.

Two sneaky road games await — Facing New Mexico and UNLV, two games that could damage an NCAA Tournament bid more than help improve it.

3.) Boise State – 63 points

Boise State started off slow against UNLV, and the lack of Emmanuel Akot was noticeable on the defensive end, but they found their stride late in the contest, winning 69-63. The loss to Colorado State is hard to swallow for the Broncos — of course, they faced an outstanding basketball team, but the missed blocking foul is the takeaway from an otherwise entertaining game. Mountain West freshman of the year Tyson Degenhart tallied 16 points while knocking down 4-4 shots from three. The Broncos could use Akot back as he’s the team’s point guard and an integral part of the defensive attack.

The Broncos head to Colorado Springs on Wednesday and return home to host Utah State on Saturday.

4.) San Diego State – 55 points

Last week further showed why San Diego State could fall short of earning an NCAA Tournament bid — the offense can go in long lulls of not scoring if Matt Bradley doesn’t put on his superman cape and drop buckets. The Aztecs had wins over San Jose State and Air Force, but neither was comfortable. SDSU ranks 222nd in KenPom’s defensive efficiency ranking, despite ranking second in defensive efficiency.

This week, the Aztecs face two difficult tests against Utah State and Fresno State.

What If The Mountain West Tournament Started Today?

5.) Fresno State – 49 points

On Friday, Fresno State couldn’t crack 60 points in their road loss to Colorado State, falling 65-50. Orlando Robinson led the scoring charge with 24 points, but nobody else reached double-figures. The loss marks the second consecutive Bulldogs loss dating back to February 6th’s Wyoming loss. The team isn’t positioned for an NCAA Tournament bid unless they make a surge in the league tournament — however, an NIT bid looks very much in the works. 

UNLV comes to Fresno on Wednesday, where Mountain West player of the year candidates Bryce Hamilton and Fresno’s Robinson try leading their respective teams to victory. Then San Diego State comes town in what should make for a defensive battle, first to 60 wins!

What If The Mountain West Tournament Started Today?

What If The Mountain West Tournament Started Today? Who gets the byes and who is favored? Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire Early look at the bracket. The Mountain West basketball tournament is less than one month away beginning on March 9 with …

What If The Mountain West Tournament Started Today?


Who gets the byes and who is favored?


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Early look at the bracket.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01fb7dafw2b08817yr player_id=none image=https://mwwire.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

The Mountain West basketball tournament is less than one month away beginning on March 9 with the opening round games, and the championship on Saturday late afternoon.

The league this year has been very competitive with a potential four-bid Mountain West in the cards with six teams in the top 60 of the NET rating.

At the top of the league is a tie between Wyoming and Boise State who each have a single loss and which happened to come against each other.

There is going to be an uneven number of games played and currently, at the top of the conference, Wyoming, Boise State, and Colorado State all have 10 wins in league play.

The top five teams. get a bye so the last team to avoid the opening round game at this point is Fresno State by being a half-game ahead of UNLV, which will be hosting the tournament.

A bye is going to be huge in this tournament to just avoid an extra game and a pesky opponent.

Not getting a bye as of now includes spoiler makers Utah State and UNLV. The Rebels playing on their home court and having Bryce Hamilton who has the ability to go off and score a ton of points is dangerous. Utah State will be a tough out despite their record as their problem has been inconsistent play; the Aggies do have a win over San Diego State and a few close losses to Boise State and Wyoming.

Early Tournament Projections

With the Mountain West being so close with quality teams. TeamRankings.com has its conference tournament projections out and it is a bit surprising to see San Diego State as the favorite to win it all despite being at 7-3. However, their schedule will have fewer games and there was the controversial ending vs. Colorado State.

Speaking of the Rams, they are nearly tied for the best odds with the Aztecs. Five teams have at least a 10% chance to win it all from these projections. This explains even more why getting a bye is huge, and especially so for Utah State is pegged in the opening round game and neck-to-neck with current No. 1 Wyoming.


Advertisement

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

Mountain West Power Rankings: Wyoming rises to number one; Utah State jumps into top five

Week 12 Mountain West rankings Contact/Follow @MWCwire Wyoming takes the top spot We’re looking at the power rankings post Week 12 of the College Basketball season. 1. Wyoming – 73 points Last week, the Cowboys faced a daunting season-defining …

Week 12 Mountain West rankings


Contact/Follow @MWCwire

Wyoming takes the top spot

[mm-video type=playlist id=01fb7dafw2b08817yr player_id=none image=https://mwwire.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

We’re looking at the power rankings post Week 12 of the College Basketball season. 

1. Wyoming – 73 points

Last week, the Cowboys faced a daunting season-defining three-game stretch, facing Boise State, Colorado State, and Fresno State. If they lost all three games, they would’ve seen their at-large resume hopes dissipate right in front of their eyes. Instead, they swept the week, starting with an overtime thriller over Colorado State, thanks to Hunter Maldonado’s 35-point outing. A few evenings later, Ike exploded with 33 points and 14 rebounds, leading to the win over the extremely hot Boise State Broncos. Just to finish the week off right, Maldonado scored 21 in the 61-59 victory in the Save Mart Center. 

Jeff Linder’s squad came in just eight points behind No. 25 Xavier in this week’s AP Poll, making them the 26th ranked team. Barring a loss to Utah State or San Jose State, expect Wyoming to find their name in next week’s AP rankings. 

2. Boise State – 71 points

The Broncos dropped their first game since the calendar flipped to 2022. The loss to Wyoming ended a 14-game winning streak, which put the Broncos firmly in the NCAA Tournament field. Abu Kigab shined with 26 points in the narrow loss, but defending Wyoming’s Ike proved difficult in the game’s final minutes. Boise State had no issues with San Jose State in the following game, winning a 76-60 contest. Emmanuel Akot was absent from the contest, putting Max Rice in the starting lineup, and Marcus Shaver pivoted to lead guard duties. Freshman sensation Tyson Degenhart tallied a career-high 23 points on 6-9 shooting in 34 minutes.

The Broncos host Bryce Hamilton & UNLV on Wednesday, before meeting Colorado State on Super Bowl Sunday, in a rescheduled game from last month. 

3. Colorado State – 65 points

After dropping the overtime thriller in Laramie, the Rams were quickly in the midst of a two-game losing streak. They had to get some revenge on San Diego State to avoid losing three consecutive — the Aztecs blasted CSU by 30 points in the first matchup. 

Colorado State led by 14 points with less than six minutes remaining. It looked like the Rams would coast to victory as time elapsed off the clock to get the train back on the tracks. SDSU sparked an 11-0 run in the final two minutes, taking the lead with less than 10 seconds left, thanks to Lamont Butler’s three-pointer. Directly after the bucket, David Roddy drilled a mid-range jumper, giving CSU the advantage right back, ending up being the game-deciding shot. Roddy scored a team-best 22 points in the contest.

Colorado State faces a tough three-game stretch — starting in Reno on Tuesday, then returning home for a Friday game against Fresno before hitting the road for Boise on Sunday. 

4. San Diego State – 51 points

Matt Bradley spearheaded the Aztecs comeback attempt in Fort Collins, scoring 29 points on 7-19 shooting, but made 9-10 free throws. Aside from Bradley, nobody scored more than eight points. Once again, on Sunday, Bradley decided to do everything scoring-wise, leading the team with 26 points and was the only player in double-figures in the narrow win over Nevada. 

The lack of offense outside of Bradley remains an issue — San Diego State ranks 233rd in KenPom’s offensive efficiency. Sure, the team ranks 1st in defensive efficiency, but you have to be flawless on defense when the offense struggles to that degree. 

SDSU faces Air Force and San Jose State this week in must-win games to keep their NCAA Tournament hopes alive. 

5. Utah State – 49 points

Don’t look now: Utah State has won five consecutive games after starting 1-5 in Mountain West play. Even more encouraging — each of those games got decided by double-digit margins. Justin Bean regained conference player of the year form, scoring 32 points against UNLV.

On Tuesday, the Aggies could strengthen their NCAA Tournament, facing Wyoming in Laramie. That won’t be an easy game, but they enter the game on that winning streak. 

Mountain West All-Decade Basketball Team

Our staff voted on the all-time Mountain West basketball team from 2010-20.

[jwplayer OMNBSaHJ-sNi3MVSU]


The All decade team, 2009-10 through 2018-19, as chosen by the fans.


Contact/Follow @aztecbreakdown.

Over the long off season I’ve seen a number of outlets release All-Decade teams for the conferences they cover. To the best of my knowledge, no one has released one for the Mountain West, so I took on the challenge. The years in question were the 2009-10 season through the 2018-19 season, as that is what I had seen the other outlets do. I asked the staff at @MWCwire to fill out a google form for their All-Decade Mountain West Team, and I asked as many fans as I could to fill out the google form as well. The results were then weighed 60% for the staff and 40% for the fans if only to help mitigate any bias from Aztec fans (who are most of my following on twitter.) 

In the poll, I had a list of 27 players, plus gave the option to write in your own player in case I missed someone. Fans and staff chose 5 first team players, 5 second-team players, and 5 third-team players. If anyone is so offended at the results you feel the need to go change them, the link to the google form will be here: https://forms.gle/HGSaCNVDqnQhVuby7

With that, let’s get into the results. Players will be listed from least votes to most votes.

Coach of the Decade: 

Steve Fisher: 213 Wins, 75.5% Win percentage, 5 regular season championships, 2 conference tournament championships, 6 Postseason appearances, 2 sweet 16s. 

This one is really a no brainer. When you consider longevity, success, conference championships, and postseason success, there’s only one choice here. Nevada and New Mexico fans stanning their guys is understandable, but it’s honestly not even a competition. Steve Fisher was the best coach of the decade, and what he was able to accomplish at San Diego State, turning it from an irrelevant school to a national program, is truly impressive. So much so that Fisher himself says that he’s more proud of what he accomplished at San Diego State than he is of winning a National Championship at Michigan.

Third Team All Decade:

Cameron Bairstow, New Mexico: 134 games, 9.2 points, 4.8 Rebs, 0.8 Ast, 13 Win shares. 

One of the hardest questions to figure out when finding an all-decade team is, what should the criteria be? Does a player need to play at a high level for multiple seasons, or is one season where you’re the best player around enough to make the team. Bairstow answers that question. His first three seasons at New Mexico were nothing special. He took the classic route of advancing from bench player to starter. In his senior season something clicked, and he exploded for 20.4 points and 7.4 rebounds a game. That single season propelled him to a spot on the all decade team. During that season Bairstow led the Lobos past the Aztecs in the MW championship game, and helped the Lobos achieve a 7 seed in the March Madness tournament. As a senior, Bairstow finished 1st in points, 8th in rebounds, 6th in blocks, and 2nd in win shares. He likely would’ve been the MW player of the year too if it wasn’t for Xavier Thames’ great season.

Josh Adams, Wyoming: 131 G, 13.9 Pts, 3.3 Rebs, 3.0 Ast, 13.94 Wins Added.

Josh Adams never got to experience a large amount of team success, but as an individual player he was consistently pretty good throughout his career. He capped off his collegiate career by scoring 24.7 points a game, to go along with 5.5 rebounds and 4.2 assists. Adams was rewarded for his stellar play by winning the 2015-16 MW Player of the Year award.  Adams currently stands at the 10th all time leading scorer in Mountain West history, after finishing in the top 10 in scoring 3 times, and leading the conference his senior year. He also finished top 5 in both assists and steals twice. His advanced data on Sports Reference is incomplete, so I substituted Wins Added for Win Shares. Adams led all Wyoming players in the decade in career Wins Added, and currently stands at 20th overall dating back to the 2005 season.

Tony Snell, New Mexico: 104 G, 9.2 Pts, 2.4 Rebs, 2 Ast, 8.9 Win Shares. 

Tony Snell was an important piece to the dominant New Mexico teams at the beginning of the decade. He played in 104 games over the course of 3 years, and was efficient with an average eFG% of 53.3% over that time. In 2013 he was the second leading scorer on a New Mexico team that won 29 games and received a 3 seed in the tournament, scoring 12.5 points to go along with 2.6 rebounds and 2.9 assists. That campaign propelled Snell to the 20th pick in the 2013 NBA draft. 

Skylar Spencer, San Diego State: 144 G, 3.8 Pts, 4.5 Reb, 0.3 Ast, 11.9 Win Shares.

When it comes to Skylar Spencer, it’s all about his defense. Offensively Spencer was pretty limited, with his best offensive season contributing a mere 4.8 points per game. HE was a great offensive rebounder though, and currently has the 7th most offensive rebounds in conference history. As for the defense, Spencer currently stands at 7th in conference history in defensive win shares. Most notably, Spencer collected more blocks over his career than any other Mountain West player and it’s not close. Spencer blocked 303 shots over his four years at San Diego State.

It’s a record that is likely to stand for a while. Neemias Queta will have a chance at breaking the record but is currently on pace to fall 34 blocks short. As for team impact, while Spencer was at SDSU the Aztec’s defense never finished ranked lower than 13th in the nation according to KenPom. That’s not all because of Spencer, but he was the defensive centerpiece. As a reward for his efforts, he took home consecutive Mountain West defensive player of the year awards.

Kendall Williams, New Mexico: 137 G, 13.2 Pts, 3.4 Reb, 4.5 Ast, 20.6 Win Shares.

Kendall WIlliams dropping down to the third team all decade blows my mind. This man is the all time leader in assists in conference history with 617. In addition to being a great passer, Williams also currently stands at 11th place in points scored all time, 8th in career steals, and won the 2013 MW player of the year award. Over the course of four years Williams collected 20.6 win shares, which happens to be the most out of any MW player collected during the decade, and 4th in conference history.  One of his best moments was arguably in the MW title game against the Aztecs in 2014 where Williams hit a 3 with under 30 seconds left to ice the game. I suspect his lack of pro success had a factor in Williams falling this far, but finishing with the 11th most points in the voting process is nothing to scoff at.

 

UP NEXT: Second Team

Field of 96? A Proposal for an Expanded NCAA Tournament

Field of 96? A Proposal for an Expanded NCAA Tournament in 2021 All contingency plans should be on the table for the next March Madness. Contact/Follow @andrewdieckhoff & @MWCwire Could the NCAA Tournament expand to 96 teams? As the likelihood …

[jwplayer t4KKN06X-sNi3MVSU]


Field of 96? A Proposal for an Expanded NCAA Tournament in 2021


All contingency plans should be on the table for the next March Madness.


Contact/Follow @andrewdieckhoff & @MWCwire

Could the NCAA Tournament expand to 96 teams?

As the likelihood increases for a college basketball season unlike any other, it has become open season for speculations about how the NCAA might proceed with its second-most popular sport. National outlets such as CBS Sports and The Athletic have dedicated thousands of words to enumerating nearly every scenario imaginable on how the 2020-21 hoops season might unfold.

Particularly noteworthy is Matt Norlander’s recent rundown of different tournament formats that the NCAA could adopt for its annual spring fling. While most options were presented in a positive light, his final suggestion – temporarily expanding the field to 96 teams – came with multiple all-caps warnings:

WARNING, WARNING: DO NOT DO THIS, NCAA. DON’T EVER DO THIS.

I REPEAT: ONE YEAR ONLY AND PREFERABLY IN AN ALTERNATE UNIVERSE FROM OUR OWN

DO NOT DO THIS, NCAA. I’M GOING AGAINST EVERYTHING IN MY DNA BY EVEN PUTTING THIS OPTION OUT THERE.

Clearly, Norlander isn’t sold on the idea of giving out extra bids.

Even so, he does outline a few broad strokes for a 96-team field would look, most notably suggesting that each conference would be awarded two automatic bids and divvy out the remaining 32 at-large bids to leagues “based on historical league performance.”

The idea is treated with such contempt, however, that its author goes into no further detail, leaving at least one reader to wonder what it would look like to play this tune out. With seemingly endless time to speculate until anybody in charge makes any official proclamations, we here at the Mountain West Wire are happy to tug on that thread.

Let’s make one thing clear before we begin: I’m not advocating for this proposed and very very hypothetical tournament format to become the new status quo. And just in case you’re worried that the idea is gaining traction with the powers that be, NCAA president Mark Emmert recently said that pulling off even a 64-team tournament in a bubble scenario would be “tough.”

He makes a fair point. But what if the NCAA were to split up an expanded 96-team field over multiple bubbles, with the winner of each regional bracket advancing to a separate Final Four weekend event?

There are a few reasons why this hypothetical 96-team model could make some sense if the non-conference season is eventually canceled or severely truncated:

  • It allows for tournament games to be played across five sites total and could reasonably be completed within four to five weeks, including rest periods.
  • It increases the total number of NCAA Tournament games being played, potentially helping the NCAA and its member programs recoup some of the financial losses suffered due to the lack of a 2019-20 postseason and assuming there is no non-conference play in 2020-21. A guarantee of multiple teams from each conference would increase the NCAA Tournament units earned by each league.
  • It recognizes that the typical at-large selection process would lose the context provided by non-conference games and accounts for the lack of data by giving more bids to programs from all 32 conferences, while attempting to preserve existing hierarchies among the leagues with regard to the distribution of at-large bids.
  • It removes the subjective NCAA Tournament selection process, which would be hindered by the lack of inter-conference data, replacing the typical 68-team bracket with four brackets, each of which are comprised of 24 teams chosen from eight predetermined, geographically proximal conferences.
  • It places an even greater importance on winning conference games, which seems reasonable in the hypothetical scenario in which the non-conference slate is axed.
  • It allows each conference to exercise its own judgment regarding how its representative teams will be selected (conference tournament, order of finish in league play, etc.), giving each team a clear and unchanging rubric for how to make the NCAA Tournament and the consequences for falling in the standings.

Is it an ideal solution? Of course not. However, it’s going to take some enterprising spirit to get college basketball back, and so we can’t be afraid to discuss taking a first step down a potentially slippery slope. Norlander pointed out in his piece that the tournament has only ever expanded – it has never contracted. It’s a fair concern.

But If there were ever a season for a break-the-glass contingency plan, this is it.

NCAA senior VP of college basketball, Dan Gavitt, recently told Andy Katz, “We’ll be flexible. We’ll be nimble and we’ll deliver what the country is desperately looking for again and that’s just an incredible March Madness tournament in 2021.”

Here’s hoping Gavitt is serious, because the proposal that follows will certainly test the tensile strength of the NCAA’s flexibility.

If nothing else, it has been a fun thought exercise to put this together, and in the end, it may not be the worst idea I will ever have. Here goes nothing. (And who knows? Maybe we’ll find a miracle cure tomorrow and all of this will be moot.)

BID ALLOTMENT

By expanding the tournament, each league would still receive an automatic bid into the tournament, and further, each would be guaranteed one spot in round of 64 by virtue of its champion receiving a bye past the qualifying round. The remaining 64 at-large teams square off to see who fills out the bracket.

Of course, it would be naive to think that all leagues are created equal. But just how do you quantify the inequality that we know to exist between conferences?  One way is to look at the distribution of at-large bids granted to each conference over recent years, as well as to look at which leagues had teams under close consideration for an at-large bid. I’ll spare you all the calculations, and you can feel free to argue with them, but I established three tiers for the Division I conferences based on recent history:

  • Near-Lock Multi-Bid Leagues (Tier 1)
    • American, Atlantic 10, ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big XII, Pacific 12, SEC
  • Potential Multi-Bid Leagues (Tier 2)
    • Conference USA, Ivy League, Mid-American, Missouri Valley, Mountain West, Ohio Valley, Southern, West Coast
  • Near-Lock One-Bid Leagues (Tier 3)
    • America East, Atlantic Sun, Big Sky, Big South, Big West, Colonial, Horizon, MAAC, MEAC, Northeast, Patriot, Southland, Summit, Sun Belt, SWAC, WAC

By splitting the leagues up in such a way, bids can be evenly spread across the tiers:

  • Tier 1: five (5) bids per league x 8 leagues = 40 bids
  • Tier 2: three (3) bids per league x 8 leagues = 24 bids
  • Tier 3: two (2) bids per league x 16 leagues = 32 bids

Of course, while most of us may recognize a reality in which the Big Ten and the A-10 would likely not receive the same number of bids in a normal year, this is not a normal year. By divvying up bids from the start, the NCAA could save itself a big headache down the line in trying to split hairs between schools. They could also allow conferences to determine how their bids are chosen.

Don’t want to have a conference tournament at all? Fine, don’t! Want to choose your participants based strictly on order of finish in league play instead? Go for it! Want to use a conference tournament to determine your automatic bid and the league standings to determine the at-large representatives? You do you!

There are also questions of where to play the games, but I will save that discussion for another time, though. This is all hypothetical, after all, and there are people much better equipped to answer those questions. In fact, our own Jeremy Mauss touched on this topic earlier this week.

Instead, what I will break down is how the NCAA could actually hold this 96-team tournament in a mostly-travel-friendly way that takes the guesswork out of their lives in the event the non-conference season is canceled. Things look a little messy at first glance, but it could be an elegant solution if the NCAA decided to temporarily expand its tournament field.

Here are some important things to note:

  • The hypothetical tournament field would consist of 96 teams, with 32 conference champions receiving an automatic bid into the Round of 64. The remaining 64 bids would be allotted in a predetermined manner and seeded into a qualifying round in their respective bracket.
  • The 32 conferences would be evenly split into one the four regional brackets based on geographical footprint and the tiers noted above. Each bracket would include two Tier 1 leagues, two Tier 2 leagues, and four Tier 3 leagues, resulting in a total of 24 bids being allotted to each region. The four regional brackets would be structured as follows:
    • North: Big Ten, A-10, MVC, MAC, Horizon, Patriot, MAAC, NEC
    • East: ACC, Big East, Ivy, OVC, CAA, ASUN, AEC, MEAC
    • West: Pac-12, AAC, WCC, MWC, WAC, Big West, Summit, Big Sky
    • South: Big XII, SEC, SOCON, CUSA, Sun Belt, Southland, Big South, SWAC
  • The schedule might cause some complications of course, but if the brackets are split up into four separate sites each having the ability to play two games at overlapping times, that would facilitate things. Assuming a March 25 start date, here’s a sample timeline for the tournament, with built-in recovery periods:
    • Qualifying Round: Thurs., March 25 and Fri., March 26
    • First Round: Sat., March 27 and Sun. March 28
    • 10-day recovery period: Mon., March 29 through Wed., April 7
    • Regional Quarterfinals (same sites): Thurs., April 8 and Fri., April 9
    • Regional Semifinals: Sat., April 10
    • Regional Finals: Sun., April 11
    • 12-Day recovery period: Mon., April 12 through Fri., April 23
    • National Semifinals (new Final Four site): Sat., April 24
    • National Championship: Mon., April 26

Sure, it’s more April Madness than traditionalists might prefer, but it gets the job done in just about a month’s time, and provides some flexibility to accelerate or slow the schedule as needed.

Next is a glimpse at how each bracket would look, including how the conferences would be divided up and seeded into the tournament field.

(NOTE: To provide some extra context, I’ve included a mock-up of what each bracket would look like using results from the 2019-20 season. For the leagues that finished their conference tournaments, including the Mountain West, tournament champions were awarded the automatic bid. For all other leagues, bids were determined by conference tournament seeding, ignoring any results from canceled tournaments.)

NORTH BRACKET

  • Qualifying Round
    • Missouri Valley #2 vs. Mid-American #3
    • Atlantic 10 #4 vs. Big Ten #5
    • Atlantic 10 #2 vs. MAAC #2
    • Big Ten #3 vs. Patriot #2
    • Mid-American #2 vs. Missouri Valley #3
    • Big Ten #4 vs. Atlantic 10 #5
    • Big Ten #2 vs. NEC #2
    • Atlantic 10 #3 vs. Horizon #2
  • First Round
    • Big Ten Champion vs. NEC Champion
    • MVC #2/MAC #3 winner vs. A10 #4/B1G #5 winner
    • A10 #2/MAAC #2 winner vs. B1G #3/Patriot #2 winner
    • Mid-American Champion vs. Horizon Champion
    • Atlantic 10 Champion vs. MAAC Champion
    • MAC #2/MVC #3 winner vs. B1G #4/A10 #5 winner
    • B1G #2/NEC #2 winner vs. A10 #3/Horizon #2 winner
    • Missouri Valley Champion vs. Patriot Champion

For context, here’s how this bracket would look using 2019-20 results as earlier noted:

96team-north

EAST BRACKET

  • Qualifying Round
    • Ivy #2 vs. OVC #3
    • Big East #4 vs. ACC #5
    • Big East #2 vs. America East #2
    • ACC #3 vs. ASUN #2
    • OVC #2 vs. Ivy #3
    • ACC #4 vs. Big East #5
    • ACC #2 vs. MEAC #2
    • Big East #3 vs. CAA #2
  • First Round
    • ACC Champion vs. MEAC Champion
    • Ivy #2/OVC #3 winner vs. BE #4/ACC #5 winner
    • BE #2/AEC #2 winner vs. ACC #3/ ASUN #2 winner
    • OVC Champion vs. CAA Champion
    • Big East Champion vs. America East Champion
    • OVC #2/Ivy #3 winner vs. ACC #4/BE #5 winner
    • ACC #2/MEAC #2 winner vs. Big East #3/CAA #2 winner
    • Ivy Champion vs. ASUN Champion

For context, here’s how this bracket would look using 2019-20 results as earlier noted:

96team-east

WEST BRACKET

  • Qualifying Round
    • WCC #2 vs. Mountain West #3
    • American #4 vs. Pac-12 #5
    • American #2 vs. Summit #2
    • Pac-12 #3 vs. Big West #2
    • Mountain West #2 vs. WCC #3
    • Pac-12 #4 vs. American #5
    • Pac-12 #2 vs. Big Sky #2
    • American #3 vs. WAC #2
  • First Round
    • Pac-12 Champion vs. Big Sky Champion
    • WCC #2/MWC #3 winner vs. AAC #4/P12 #5 winner
    • AAC #2/Summit #2 winner vs. P12 #3/BW #2 winner
    • Mountain West Champion vs. WAC Champion
    • American Champion vs. Summit Champion
    • MWC #2/WCC #3 winner vs. P12 #4/AAC #5 winner
    • P12 #2/Big Sky #2 winner vs. AAC #3/WAC #2 winner
    • WCC Champion vs. Big West Champion

For context, here’s how this bracket would look using 2019-20 results as earlier noted:

96team-west

SOUTH BRACKET

  • Qualifying Round
    • SOCON #2 vs. C-USA #3
    • SEC #4 vs. Big XII #5
    • SEC #2 vs. Big South #2
    • Big XII #3 vs. Southland #2
    • C-USA #2 vs. SOCON #3
    • Big XII #4 vs. SEC #5
    • Big XII #2 vs. SWAC #2
    • SEC #3 vs. Sun Belt #2
  • First Round
    • Big XII Champion vs. SWAC Champion
    • SOCON #2/CUSA #3 winner vs. SEC #4/B12 #5 winner
    • SEC #2/Big South #2 winner vs. B12 #3/SL #2 winner
    • Conference USA Champion vs. Sun Belt Champion
    • SEC Champion vs. Big South Champion
    • CUSA #2/SOCON #3 winner vs. B12 #4/SEC #5 winner
    • B12 #2/SWAC #2 winner vs. SEC #3/SB #2 winner
    • SOCON Champion vs. Southland Champion

For context, here’s how this bracket would look using 2019-20 results as earlier noted:

96team-south

Well, there you have it. Have thoughts on the brackets? Suggestions for how it could be improved? Just want to complain? Crack your knuckles and head over Twitter to continue the conversation with @mwcwire.

Andrew is a current USBWA member, covering college basketball for Mountain West Wire of the USA TODAY Sports Media Group. He also runs the Dieckhoff Power Index, a college basketball analytics system, and provides bracketology predictions throughout the season.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

Five for ’21: Ranking the Mountain West’s Top Five Shot Blockers

Five for ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Shot Blockers Predicting the top five Mountain West shot blockers for the ’20-21 season Contact/Follow @andrewdieckhoff & @MWCwire Who are the top shot blockers in the MW? In the third installment …

[jwplayer 18QegcJn-sNi3MVSU]


Five for ’21: Ranking The Mountain West’s Top Five Shot Blockers


Predicting the top five Mountain West shot blockers for the ’20-21 season


Contact/Follow @andrewdieckhoff & @MWCwire

Who are the top shot blockers in the MW?

In the third installment of Mountain West Wire’s offseason series, Five for ’21, we shift our focus from the league’s offensive stars onto its defensive stalwarts.

As a reminder, the Five For ’21 series features our ranking of the top five Mountain West players in five different skill sets: passing, scoring, defending, rebounding, and shot blocking. The full Five For ’21 series schedule is below, including links to this week’s previous articles from Larry Muniz (Twitter: @hardwoodtalk).

  • Monday: Passers
  • Tuesday: Scorers
  • Wednesday: Shot Blockers
  • Thursday: Defenders
  • Friday: Rebounders

Today, we focus on the Mountain West’s top shot-blockers. This list has a distinctly international feel, so it is fitting that we start our countdown with one of the league’s most well-traveled players, whose long trip from Belgrade to Boise features a two-year stop in the Volunteer State.

5) Mladen Armus, Boise State

  • Height/Weight: 6’10”, 230 lbs.
  • 2018-19 (at ETSU): 33 GP (24 GS), 1.0 BPG, 5.5 BLK%, 4.6 FC/40

After spending two seasons in the SOCON at East Tennessee State, the 6-10 Armus decided to pack his bags and head west to ride with the Broncos, where he will have two years of eligibility remaining after sitting out last season. In his sophomore season for ETSU, Armus racked up nearly eight points and eight rebounds per game and became a fixture in the starting lineup — and not just for his serviceable offensive game.

The Serbian center showed steady improvement on defense in his second year in Johnson City, tallying just under two “stocks” (steals plus blocks) per game in 2018-19. As a freshman, Armus’ block percentage in SOCON games was just 1.4% — for reference, Justinian Jessup finished last season with a 1.6 BLK% — but he brought that number up to 5.9% in SOCON play last season and 5.5% overall, which would have been good for fifth-best in the Mountain West last year.

Armus could fill a huge role for Boise State on defense in 2020-21. While RJ Williams was able to make up for the team’s lack of size last season with a remarkable tenacity and instinct for rebounding, his 6’7″ stature didn’t translate to many blocks. With Derrick Alston Jr. back for one more year, and plenty of offensive support from Abu Kigab, Marcus Shaver, Devonaire Doutrive, and Emmanuel Akot, Armus will be relied upon to be the defensive anchor down low that Leon Rice needs to round out this talented roster.

4) K.J. Hymes, Nevada

  • Height/Weight: 6’10”, 210 lbs.
  • 2019-20 Stats: 31 GP (1 GS), 1.0 BPG, 8.7 BLK%, 9.5 FC/40

Hymes came into his first season in Reno with some considerable hype, after being pegged as the preseason Mountain West Freshman of the Year. Unfortunately for the Phoenix native, he never quite lived up to that billing. For Hymes, the issue was not so much about talent or athleticism, but discipline in defending. He averaged just under 14 minutes per game as a freshman behind BC grad transfer Johncarlos Reyes, and Hymes likely would have seen a larger share of playing time had he been able to stay out of foul trouble.

But when Hymes does stay on the floor, he can be a nightmare for would-be scorers entering into his airspace. All that time in the penalty box (so to speak) kept the big man from qualifying in the Mountain West’s statistical races, but if the threshold is lowered to include all players who appeared in more than a third of their team’s total minutes last year, Hymes had the best block percentage in the Mountain West by a decent margin, beating out Neemias Queta’s mark by almost a full percentage point.

The shot-blocking talent is certainly there for Hymes, but it is difficult to swat anything from the bench. If he can develop some more defensive discipline as a sophomore, he should find a welcome home into Steve Alford’s starting five. The question then becomes whether the impressive statistics will carry over to a larger sample size, of course, but there is good reason to believe that Hymes will be among the five best shot-blockers in the Mountain West in 2020-21.

3) Cheikh Mbacke Diong, UNLV

  • Height/Weight: 6’11”, 235 lbs.
  • 2019-20: 32 GP (27 GS), 1.2 BPG, 6.0 BLK%, 4.6 FC/40 

Over the course of three seasons in Las Vegas, Diong has become an absolute difference maker for the Runnin’ Rebels. While the Senegalese senior is no threat to win a scoring title anytime soon, his tough interior play has allowed him to become one of the league’s top defensive big men. Diong’s 7.5 BLK% during Mountain West play last year was second only to Utah State’s Neemias Queta (7.9) among qualified players, and his steal percentage was fourth-highest in the conference.

Diong’s imposing physical presence has always made him a bulwark in the post, but his improved timing and positioning helped the center finish just outside the Top 100 nationally in block percentage the past two seasons, as well as a Top 50 finish in offensive rebounding. He was also one of only four Mountain West players to record three or more games with 10+ points, 10+ rebounds, and 2+ blocks last year (Justin Bean, Nate Grimes, and Neemias Queta being the others).

A hard-nosed grinder, Diong has carved out a solid niche for himself on this UNLV roster, which does lose some size and physicality with the departures Donnie Tillman, Nick Blair, and Vitaly Shibel. While Diong’s offensive game has improved to some degree, players such as Bryce Hamilton, David Jenkins Jr., and Marvin Coleman should be carrying the scoring load, freeing the big man up to continue honing his blue-collar craft on defense.

2) Neemias Queta, Utah State

  • Height/Weight: 7’0″, 245 lbs.
  • 2019-20: 22 GP (20 GS) 2.6 BPG, 7.8 BLK%, 3.5 FC/40

While others may have had better numbers in smaller sample sizes, it was Queta who will go down as the Mountain West’s best shot-blocker of 2019-20. Despite missing multiple games himself due to an offseason injury, Queta was able to secure enough minutes on the season to let his 7.8 BLK% rule the day. Unfortunately for the Portuguese big man, he had to relinquish his MW Defensive Player of the Year crown to San Diego State’s Malachi Flynn. But he’ll have his eyes set on getting it back in 2020-21.

There is some cause for concern about Queta’s shot-blocking, however. In his freshman season at Utah State, he recorded a 10.5 BLK%, which was easily the best in the league and Top 20 in Division I. However, following the knee injury Queta suffered during FIBA play in the summer of 2019, some of the spring seemed to have gone out of his step. But Queta returned to form down the stretch, recording at least one block in 12 of his last 13 games, with multiple blocks coming in ten of those contests.

Even after accounting for the dip in Queta’s post-injury block percentage, the junior seven-footer is still undoubtedly one of the two best post defenders in the Mountain West. But with Sam Merrill gone, it will be more important than ever to keep Queta out of foul trouble, which could mean he has to trade some of the defensive risk-taking that has earned him so many blocks in his first two years in Logan.

1) Nathan Mensah, San Diego State

  • Height/Weight: 6’10”, 220 lbs.
  • 2019-20: 13 GP (13 GS); 1.7 BPG, 10.7 BLK%, 4.9 FC/40

In a cruel (and scary) twist of fate, the tremendous start to Mensah’s season was cut short by a pulmonary embolism that was thankfully caught before the situation turned any more tragic. The Aztecs were still perfect at that point, and we will simply never know what could have been had Mensah been able to play for the full season, both for the team and individually. (Go ahead and add all that to the list of things we’ll never know about the 2019-20 season.)

Here’s what we do know: Nathan Mensah was on a trajectory to be the league’s best shot-blocker before his season was ended early. His 10.7 BLK% would have led the league by a full two points had he kept that pace for the long haul, and it would have placed him somewhere in the back end of the Top 20 nationally. While Queta had the minutes to qualify for the season-long statistical races, it was Mensah who began to blossom into the Mountain West’s most elite shot-blocker on a per-minute basis.

Of course, Mensah’s health remains a question mark, as updates regarding his recovery have been scarce. Thankfully, the stories have been trending in a positive direction since January, and all indications point to him returning to the Aztecs’ lineup whenever the college basketball season resumes. If the Nathan Mensah Block Party does resume on time, San Diego State will be well-positioned to defend last year’s regular-season crown. With any luck, Mensah can finally put to rest some of those nagging what-ifs from 2020.

Also considered (in alphabetical order): Desmond Cambridge, Nevada; Assane Diouf, Fresno State; Trevin Dorius, Utah State; Kuba Karwowski, Utah State; Eduardo Lane, San Jose State; Bayron Matos, New Mexico; Braxton Meah, Fresno State; Orlando Robinson, Fresno State; David Roddy, Colorado State; Warren Washington, Nevada.

Andrew Dieckhoff is a current USBWA member covering college basketball for Mountain West Wire. He also runs the Dieckhoff Power Index, a website dedicated to his college basketball ratings system and bracketology projections.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

[protected-iframe id=”09e6ca4e11e5838c3834d87c7b471ffb-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://anchor.fm/mwwire/embed” width=”400px” height=”102px” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

JaVale McGee brings millions inside the NBA bubble

Former Nevada player and current Los Angeles Lakers center JaVale McGee started a YouTube vlog about what life is like in the NBA bubble.

[jwplayer jF5wU66N-sNi3MVSU]


Los Angeles Lakers player vlogs about life in the Disney World bubble


Contact/Follow @cisabelg & @MWCwire

JaVale McGee hasn’t played for the Nevada Wolf Pack since 2008, but the next three months might give him flashbacks to his college life.

“I feel like I’m in college. I feel like I’m in a dorm,” he told his dad on a video chat featured in one of his YouTube videos.

The 7’0 Lakers center recently started Life in the Bubble, a vlog that gives a true insider look at what life is like for NBA players staying in the Disney World bubble. McGee’s oldest video on his YouTube channel is the Golden State Warriors’ Championship parade three years ago. He has not always been a consistent vlogger, although he has shared a decent amount of music credited to Pierre, his music producer alter ego.

Life in the Bubble is only about two weeks old, with the first episode being released on July 12. However, each of the first six episodes have reached at least a million views and have helped him acquire 432K subscribers even with less than 40 total videos in his channel. An episode titled Full Team Scrimmage! Who Won?! posted on July 21 has been the most popular so far, reaching 2.1 million views. That video also happens to debut LeBron James and head coach Frank Vogel.

Sports bubbles are something that have not really been done before, so a lot of people are curious about the details of it. McGee’s videos show a range of stuff, from the Call of Duty set up in his room to the area where players get tested for COVID-19. Since McGee is a familiar face, other players and staff are seen having relaxed, casual interactions with him.

Stacey Robinson, a massage therapist who McGee playfully teases, has quickly become a fan favorite. She doesn’t love being on camera, she told McGee to “turn that mess off” after he told her she was a star and people love her on the internet.

A handful of players have already shared photos of food, but the vlog shows McGee’s experience with his vegan diet. Spoiler alert: not everything is good, but the tater tots are fire. McGee is not afraid to share parts of his personal life. In one episode, he is seen having a conversation with strength and conditioning coach Chattin Hill talking about when he first found out he had asthma.

McGee films his own videos but they are edited by Devin Dismang who is also an executive producer of the series. They feature some of Pierre’s music.

The latest episode came out July 26 and it’s a little different from the other ones.

“Another 9AM Practice? I wasn’t in the mood to vlog so decided to make one of my teammates do it,” wrote McGee, not a morning person, in the YouTube video description.

Danny Green, who has his own podcast called Inside the Green Room, was the lucky player to take over the show for that day.

The Lakers are not the only ones with this type of content. Matisse Thybulle from the Philadelphia 76ers is also vlogging a series called Welcome to the Bubble. The rookie films and edits all the material himself. As for media members, outlets like the Washington Post have published content sharing their own experiences.

Fans have already shown their love for insider looks. Earlier this year, Michael Jordan’s The Last Dance averaged 5.6 million viewers throughout its 10 episodes. In Thybulle’s first video, Tobias Harris joked about how they were practically filming their own version of an ESPN 30 for 30. With a limited amount of media access in Orlando, any content that gives an inside look at the bubble should be hot stuff for a while, so maybe that’s not so far fetched.

The NBA is currently playing scrimmages but the season is set to officially restart at the end of July. McGee and the rest of the Lakers will face the Los Angeles Clippers for their first game at the ESPN Wide World of Sports Arena on July 30.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

Mountain West Alumni In NBA Bubble

Ten Mountain West basketball alumni are inside the Disney World NBA bubble as the 22 teams are getting ready for the 2019-20 season to resume.

[jwplayer jF5wU66N-sNi3MVSU]


Mountain West alumni in the NBA bubble


Five Mountain West schools will be represented as the NBA resumes


Contact/Follow @cisabelg & @MWCwire

The NBA is getting ready for a restart at the end of this month with the 22 teams that made it into the bubble in Florida. Among the players who made the trip are 10 Mountain West alumni representing five schools in eight NBA teams.

JaVale McGee – Los Angeles Lakers 
Nevada Wolf Pack (2006–2008)

Before the season was paused, McGee was proving to be a valuable asset for the Lakers, the team that currently sits at the top of the Western Conference with a 49-14 record. 

He’s played in 61 games this season. In the 16.8 minutes he is averaging, the 7’0 center is getting 6.8 points, 5.8 rebounds and 1.5 blocks per game. Before the pause, he was shooting at 64.0% from the field and 50.0% from beyond the arc.

McGee has asthma, and was even hospitalized with pneumonia for three days in 2018. However, he has made it known that he feels the organization will take the necessary precautions to keep him and others safe in the bubble.

 

Kawhi Leonard – Los Angeles Clippers
San Diego State Aztecs (2009–2011)

Leonard delayed his trip to Orlando due to family matters but he has arrived and participated in his first practice on July 13. 

He is eight overall in the league in scoring this season with an average of 26.9 points per game. He is also contributing 7.3 rebounds and 5 assists per game to his team. His talent is obvious, the main question is his health. Leonard is known for load management, and was struggling with an old knee injury when the NBA was suspended.

During media availability on July 13 head coach Doc Rivers said he didn’t expect limits on Leonard because “Kawhi is healthy, for the most part” but that they were still going to be smart about how they maintained him and the rest of the players to get to the playoffs with a healthy team.

Paul George – Los Angeles Clippers
Fresno State Bulldogs (2008–2010)

Like Leonard, George wasn’t fully healthy when the world of sports stopped turning. He was recovering from offseason surgery on both shoulders but the last four months have given that recovery some extra time.

George is the Clippers’ second highest scorer, contributing 21.0 points. 5.7 rebounds and 3.9 assists per game.

The Clippers are No. 2 in the Western Conference standings, just below the Lakers, a team the Clippers have already beat twice this season. The two LA teams will face off on the first day of reopening. 

Brandon Clarke – Memphis Grizzlies
SJSU Spartans (2015–2017)

This is Clarke’s first season in the NBA. He has appeared in 50 games, averaging 12.0 points 5.8 rebounds and 1.4 assists per game. The 6’8 power forward suffered a quadriceps injury late February, but the four-month break gave him time to recover so he can finish his rookie season on the court.

Memphis will reopen the season with a game against the Portland Trail Blazers on July 31. When the Grizzlies beat Portland on Feb. 12, Clarke tied his season-high 27 points by going 12-of-14 from the field. That wasn’t completely out of character because he has been shooting at 62.3% this season.

 

Zylan Cheatham New Orleans Pelicans
San Diego State Aztecs (2015–2017)

Cheatham went undrafted in 2019 but his participation with the Pelicans during Summer League that year helped him sign a two-way contract with the team.

The rookie has only appeared in three games for the Pelicans so far, but he’s had good experience with Erie, the Pelican’s G-League affiliate. In 34 appearances there he averaged 16.2 points and 11.6 rebounds. 

Patrick McCaw – Toronto Raptors 
UNLV Rebels (2014–2016)

McCaw has won three championship rings in his first three seasons in the NBA. He’ll continue chasing a fourth one alongside the Raptors, the team that has surprised the league by reaching second place in the Eastern Conference even without Kawhi Leonard.

McCaw has seen the court in 37 games this season, with an average of 4.6 points, 2.3 rebounds and 2.1 assists per game. The Raptors had all 17 roster members go into the bubble. The players and other members of the organization have been in Florida since June 22.

Paul Watson – Toronto Raptors
Fresno State Bulldogs (2013–2017)

Watson started the season with Raptors 905, Toronto’s G-League affiliate, averaging 18.4 points and 7.2 rebounds in 13 games. It took almost three years after graduating from Fresno State, but Watson finally made his NBA debut with the Atlanta Hawks early January thanks to a 10-day contract.

After he was released by the Hawks, Watson signed a two-way deal with Toronto on Jan. 15. 

Derrick Jones Jr.– Miami Heat
UNLV Rebels (2015–2016)

Jones tested positive for COVID-19 shortly after the NBA began mandatory testing in preparation for the resumption of the season. The 23-year-old never reported any symptoms and he was cleared in time to travel to Florida with the rest of his team.

Jones has played in 51 games this season, averaging 8.9 points and 4.2 rebounds and 1.1 assists per game.

Tyler Johnson Brooklyn Nets
Fresno State  (2010–2014)

Johnson is new to the Nets. The 6’4 guard signed with the team late June, but he brought plenty of experience with him. He appeared in 31 games with the Phoenix Suns earlier this season, averaging 5.7 points, 1.7 rebounds and 1.6 assists in 16.6 minutes per game.

He has registered a combined 301 career games with the Suns and the Miami Heat.

Khem Birch – Orlando Magic
UNLV (2012–2014)

Birch was re-signed by the Magic in 2019, a two-year deal. The 6’9 center is not a scorer, but he is a valuable role player. Head coach Steve Clifford asked the 27-year-old to go way outside his comfort zone this season. Injuries were affecting the team and as a result, Birch was asked to play as starting power forward. 

The NBA is beginning scrimmages on July 22, and the Magic will get a good look at where they are at by having their first game be against the Clippers.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1361]

2020-21 Mountain West Basketball Non-Conference Schedule Tracker

Stay up to date with the Mountain West basketball non-conference schedule.

[jwplayer jF5wU66N-sNi3MVSU]


2020-21 Mountain West Basketball Non-Conference Schedule Tracker


Schedules are taking shape for Mountain West hoops.


Contact/Follow @JeremyMauss & @MWCwire

Non-conference games.

The Mountain West non-conference basketball schedule is taking shape and we will update when more games are announced. We are getting a lot of help from the invaluable help from @D1Docket on Twitter who rounds up a lot of these schedules.

This list will be updated when more games are confirmed.

Air Force

  • Nov. 19-21 Puerto Rico Event. Teams involved are Florida Atlantic, Hofstra, and Southern Illinois
  • Dec. 5 at St. Joseph’s

Boise State

  • vs. Tulsa (TBD)
  • at BYU (TBD)
  • Santa Clara (TBD)
  • at Cal State Northridge (TBD)
  • Nov. 26 – 29: Orlando Invitational (Press Release)
  • Dec. 5 at Rhode Island

Colorado State

  • MGM Main Event: Nov. 20 vs. Louisville
  • MGM Main Event: Nov. 22 vs. Arkansas or San Francisco
  • Dec. 5 vs. Richmond

Fresno State

  • at San Francisco (TBD)
  • vs. Cal State Northridge (TBD)
  • Nov. 20 vs. San Diego
  • Dec. 5 vs. George Mason
  • Dec. 12 vs. Cal Poly

Nevada

  • at UT-Arlington (TBD)
  • Pacific (TBD)
  • Nov. 23-25 Cayman Islands Classic
  • Dec. 2 vs. Pacific
  • Dec. 6 vs. Dayton
  • Dec. 18 at Santa Clara
  • Dec. 21 at San Diego

New Mexico

  • vs. UTEP (TBD)
  • Abilene Christian (TBD)
  • @ Grandy Canyon (TBD)
  • Nov. 21 vs. New Mexico State
  • Nov. 26-27 Las Vegas Exempt Event
  • Dec. 2 St. Bonaventure
  • Dec. 5 at New Mexico State

San Diego State

San Jose State

  •  Nov. 12 vs. Cal Poly
  • Nov. 16 at Maryland
  • Nov. 18 at Duquesne
  • Nov. 21 vs. Cal Baptist
  • Nov. 25 vs. Hofstra
  • Dec. 21 vs. Santa Clara

UNLV

  • Nov. 23-25 Maui Invite
  • Nov. 28 Whittier College
  • Dec. 2 at VCU
  • Dec. 5 at Kansas State
  • Dec. 16 vs. Florida A&M
  • Dec. 20 vs. Omaha
  • Dec. 22 at SMU

Utah State

  • At Weber State (TBD)
  • vs. UC Irvine (TBD)
  • Nov. 18 – 21 Myrtle Beach Invitational
  • Dec. 1 at Davidson
  • Dec. 5 vs. BYU
  • Dec. 12 vs. Saint Mary’s
  • Dec. 15 vs. Dixie State
  • Dec. 21 vs. Mississippi State (at Panama City Beach, Florida)

Wyoming

  • South Dakota State (TBD)
  • Arkansas-Pine Bluff (TBD)
  • Dec. 5. vs. Duquesne
  • Dec. 12 at Utah Valley

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1360]

[protected-iframe id=”f7652191f99ba13728097498e8a79cd8-137729785-123448869″ info=”https://open.spotify.com/embed-podcast/show/48681pqFq0kB9dhrtPPoNd” width=”100%” height=”232″ frameborder=”0″]

Mountain West All-Time Championship: 2009 Utah vs. 2018 Nevada

Mountain West All-Time Championship: 2009 Utah vs. 2018 Nevada A wild ride for No. 12 vs. No. 14 Contact/Follow @MWCwire A double-digit seed will win it all. The final game is here and it is the 2009 Utah Utes taking on the 2018 Nevada Wolf Pack who …

[jwplayer jF5wU66N-sNi3MVSU]


Mountain West All-Time Championship: 2009 Utah vs. 2018 Nevada


A wild ride for No. 12 vs. No. 14


Contact/Follow @MWCwire

A double-digit seed will win it all.

The final game is here and it is the 2009 Utah Utes taking on the 2018 Nevada Wolf Pack who survived the best of seven series using WhatIfSports to simulate the games. So, if you have an issue take it up with them.

Championship:

#12 Nevada vs. #14 Utah.

Once again, both of the lower-seeded teams won in Round 3. Neither of the series even went to 7 games and the upsets still happened. With this trend, expect Utah to be crowned king of the Mountain West.

Championship Preview: Nevada has home court for the first time this tournament. Does that throw them off their groove somehow? They’ve scored on everyone they’ve come across. There’s no reason for that to change now. That being said, this Nevada has a lot of size on the wing but no true bigs to match up against Luke Nevill. Nevada struggled with teams that had true bigs, like SDSU, in 2018. Will Luke Nevill be their kryptonite, or will Nevada’s overall size and offensive output overwhelm the Utes?

Game 1: Lawlor Events Center, Series tied 0-0.

A defensive struggle was not what I anticipated in this series. Luke Nevill played well but got no support,  while the Martin twins did their thing.

Game 2: Lawlor Events Center, Nevada leads series 1-0.

Aside from Nevill, Utah didn’t show up until the second half. Can they change things up at home?

Game 3: Jon M. Huntsman Center, Nevada leads series 2-0.

A very balanced effort leads to a Utah comeback victory.