Ohio State football apparently offered major NIL bag to 5-star recruit

Ohio State offered major NIL bag to 5-star recruit #GoBucks

Ohio State has had a rough stretch on the recruiting trail lately with recent commitment of David Sanders Jr. to the Tennessee Volunteers, but it appears we have some additional insight to what went wrong with the five-star’s recruitment to Ohio State.

Sanders chose Tennessee over not just Ohio State, but other hard hitting programs like Georgia. According to THE Podcast, the Buckeyes offered more NIL to Sanders than they have to their own entire offensive line. It looks like location and the fact Tennessee is rumored to be offering housing were the difference makers in his decision.

It is still not ideal that the Buckeyes are having such trouble recruiting offensive lineman, but it should be comforting to know the Ohio State staff is pulling out all the stops.

Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Josh Keatley on X.

Matt Forbes must forfeit US Open prize money, despite earning NIL

Michigan State tennis player Matt Forbes must forfeit US Open prize money, despite earning NIL.

While the landscape of college athletics is ever changing, and with the introduction of Name Image and Likeness, the rules within the sports and professional sports becomes very murky.

Michigan State tennis player Matt Forbes won the 2024 USTA National Boys’ 18s championship, earning him a spot in the US Open. Now, despite the new rules in  the NCAA where Forbes can make NIL money, he will have to forfeit his prize money for playing in the US Open.

Another rule that doesn’t make sense as the waters become more murky with the landscape of NIL in college athletics.

Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes, and opinion. You can also follow Cory Linsner on Twitter @Cory_Linsner

NCAA to bring new NIL program to bring transparency in the sport

In an attempt to create more transparency in the NIL space, the NCAA is launching the NIL Assist program

NIL has been a polarizing topic across college sports, with players now being paid through their name image and likeness, and more in particularly, NIL collectives around the universities. With these new changes, there have been a lot of debates and uneasiness around the way collectives are run and operate.

With these changes, and in attempt for transparency or any semblance of legislation, the NCAA is unveiling the NIL Assist platform.

Sports Business Journal has all the details on the new program:

Contact/Follow us @The SpartansWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Michigan State news, notes, and opinion. You can also follow Cory Linsner on Twitter @Cory_Linsner

Ryan Day claims NIL takes backseat for incoming Ohio State recruits

Ryan Day claims NIL takes backseat for incoming Ohio State recruits #GoBucks

When a player commits to a school or transfers to a larger school, it is really easy to assume that the main factor in their decision is name, image and likeness. Ryan Day was talking about the 2025 recruiting class and mentioned the fact that NIL was not a major motivating factor for anyone committed to Ohio State in 2025.

During Big Ten media days, Day pushed back on OSU shelling out the cash. “I think the thing that fires me up is the fact that none of these guys lead with NIL,: Day sais. “I mean, they’re not looking for that first. They want to be Ohio State Buckeyes. They’ve embraced the tradition and know how important it is to be a Buckeye, and they want to win a national championship when they’re here.”

This is classic coach speak, no coach is going to admit players are only committing due to the money. With that said, I do believe Day here. The Buckeyes arrived late to the NIL party, but when they arrived most of those funds were rumored to be used to convince players already enrolled to come back instead of head to the NFL.

We see a lot of schools like Miami and Ole Miss spend to get the new shiny toy, but if this season goes the way we all expect, Ryan Day’s NIL blueprint maybe the way to go. In my opinion, it also feels more appropriate to use those funds to celebrate and reward players who have developed and committed to become a Buckeye.

Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes and opinion. Follow Josh Keatley on X.

Logos may be coming to an Owen Field near you, but should they?

The NCAA is considering opening the door for advertising on playing surfaces and jerseys may not be far behind.

College football is evolving at a rapid pace. The idea of amateur athletics had been eroding before our eyes with the money not talked about, but with name, image, and likeness, it’s pretty much an idea of the past.

With the proposed settlement of a trio of anti-trust lawsuits against the NCAA leading to damages in the billions and the move to allow programs to pay players directly, schools may have to get creative in how they generate revenue.

According to USA TODAY Sports, the NCAA is considering letting schools sell advertising space on the playing surface during the regular season.

“I believe the NCAA is going to allow us to put a sponsor logo on the field during the regular season,” Florida athletics director Scott Stricklin said Wednesday at the Southeastern Conference’s spring meetings in Miramar Beach, Florida. “That’s an obvious revenue stream that has not been there in the past. The pro sports are putting patches on jerseys. That doesn’t seem like something that’s crazy for us to consider these days.”

On June 6, and NCAA association committee will discuss a proposal that would allow corporate sponsors as part of the midfield decor like it is during bowl games.

The door is opening for universities to earn more in advertising revenue. However, as Dr. Ian Malcolm so poignantly stated in Jurassic Park, “Yeah, yeah. But your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, that they didn’t stop to think if they should.”

Creative programs like the Oklahoma Athletics Department will do whatever it takes within the rules to put the most competitive team on the field every season. And that may one day mean selling advertising space to some corporate sponsor. But there comes a point where it could detract from the most important brand; the University of Oklahoma.

The main characters in college football have always been the programs. Whether it’s Oklahoma or Alabama or Michigan, players and coaches come and go, but it’s the programs that have stood the test of time.

Putting logos on Owen Field, selling naming rights to Gaylord Family Oklahoma Memorial Stadium, or putting sponsor logos on the jersey would certainly provide revenue for an athletic department that will now be tasked with paying its athletes. At the same time, if not done well, could take away from what’s left of what we love about college football.

More than ever, college football is embracing the idea that it’s a business. It’s been about the money for a long time, but athletic departments are hiring general managers to help manage the business aspects that programs are being forced to undertake to stay competitive.

There’s no going back now. We’re in the end game.

At the same time, do fans want to see telecommunication companies or airline logos on the hallowed grounds where their favorite teams play? Do they want the uniforms of their beloved universities sullied with logos from fast food companies?

Creating revenue streams is the next arms race in college football. At some point,, the beloved backdrop of the game we love will highlight a corporate entity. But ultimately, like in professional sports, the things that will matter most are the wins and losses.

Win, and most won’t care about sponsorships on the field or on the jerseys.

Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow John on X @john9williams.

NCAA, Power Five schools pave way for paying players

This seems rather significant.

In a rather shocking development (well, not really if you have been following where college athletics is headed), the NCAA and the Power Five conferences have agreed in principle to a settlement that would allow college athletes to be paid. But that’s not all, the deal also carves out $2.8 billiion in damages the NCAA would make available for current and former athletes.

According to a report from USA TODAY, the SEC and Pac-12 provided approval on the deal Thursday, on the tails of the three other Power Five conferences already giving the nod.

Part of the deal includes the “NCAA funding the damages pool over a 10-year period and schools would begin sharing future revenues with athletes. More than half of the money for the damages pool would come from reductions in the NCAA’s distributions to all Division I schools and conferences.”

“Ecstatic to get this done,” Steve Berman, one of the plaintiffs’ lead attorneys, told USA TODAY Sports as he said he was transmitting a letter to the court overseeing the cases. “When we started this, I never dreamed of this day. It’s a revolutionary moment in college sports.”

Though details will no doubt continue to emerge, according to the report, the deal could add $20 million to athletic budgets to pay players and will have no impact on Name, image and likeness deals already a part of the ever-changing landscape of college sports.

In a joint statement, the NCAA and Power Five leaders addressed the need to move forward. The deal “is an important step in the continuing reform of college sports that will provide benefits to student-athletes and provide clarity in college athletics across all divisions for years to come. This settlement is also a road map for college sports leaders and Congress to ensure this uniquely American institution can continue to provide unmatched opportunity for millions of students.”

This is huge news and just a part of how things are moving at breakneck speed as it relates to pay to play type of scenarios coming to big-time college athletics. Stay tuned. We’re sure there is more to come.

Big Ten and SEC setting up advisory committee to deal with changing college landscape

Who said the Big Ten and SEC can’t get along?

The two superpowers in the world of college athletics are joining forces. In a joint press release on Friday, the Big Ten and SEC announced the formation of an advisory board to get in front of the ever-changing landscape of college athletics.

With all of the changes that we’ve seen over the last few years, and with the NCAA’s struggles with overseeing it all, college athletics two most powerful conference have decided to try and tackle the issue themselves. From court cases, to name, image and likeness, there’s a lot that has, and probably will, continue to change.

“The Big Ten and the SEC have substantial investment in the NCAA and there is no question that the voices of our two conferences are integral to governance and other reform efforts,” Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti said. “We recognize the similarity in our circumstances, as well as the urgency to address the common challenges we face.”

The advisory group will be made up of university presidents, chancellors, and athletic directors. it could engage with other constituencies as necessary, including consultation with student-athletes and other key leadership groups from within both conferences according to the release.

“There are similar cultural and social impacts on our student-athletes, our institutions, and our communities because of the new collegiate athletics environment,” said SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey in a statement. “We do not have predetermined answers to the myriad questions facing us. We do not expect to agree on everything but enhancing interaction between our conferences will help to focus efforts on common sense solutions.”

The advisory group does not have the ability to act independently and will only serve in a consulting body. The makeup and timing of the committee is still to be determined.

Contact/Follow us @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes, and opinion. Follow Phil Harrison on X.

Rhule says ‘some people weren’t happy with me’ about NIL comments

Rhule says ‘some people weren’t happy with me’ about NIL comments

Matt Rhule continues to make headlines while discussing the future of name, image and likeness practices and rules in college football. Earlier this month, the Huskers’ head coach trended on social media after addressing the cost of a starting quarterback in the transfer portal.

“Make no mistake: a good quarterback in the portal costs $1 million to $1.5 million to $2 million right now. So, just so we’re on the same page, right? Let’s make sure we all understand what’s happening. There are some teams that have six or seven $1 million players playing for them.”

When discussing Rhule’s recent comments, Minnesota head coach P.J. Fleck agreed with the comment but stated his team would not spend that kind of money.

“That’s a true statement. That’s not necessarily what and how we do it. I’ve heard those same things, but those aren’t coming out of our camp. He’s (Rhule) not talking about us, I’ll put it that way.”

While appearing on the “Pat McAfee Show” on Tuesday afternoon, Rhule said some coaches weren’t so happy with his comments.

“I’ll tell you some people were not happy with me. I’ve had some other college coaches kinda get on me a said ‘Matt, you reset the market.’ But I do think that it’s important that people know. I went to the NFL. I’m going to say what I think is right. At the end of the day, there are no contracts.”

That wasn’t all Rhule discussed with McAfee. You can find more highlights from his interview below.

Big Ten coach agrees with Matt Rhule on NIL

A Big Ten head coach has come out in agreement with Nebraska coach Matt Rhule’s recent comments on name, image and likeness.

A Big Ten head coach has come out in agreement with Nebraska coach Matt Rhule’s recent comments on name, image and likeness money for top recruits.

Rhule was asked about the Huskers’ use of NIL and whether the team would aggressively recruit a quarterback to the roster for 2024.

“Make no mistake: A good quarterback in the portal costs $1 million to $1.5 million to $2 million right now. So, just so we’re on the same page, right? Let’s make sure we all understand what’s happening. There are some teams that have six or seven $1 million players playing for them.”

When discussing Rhule’s recent comments, Minnesota head coach P.J. Fleck agreed with the comment but stated his team would not be spending that kind of money.

“That’s a true statement. That’s not necessarily what and how we do it. I’ve heard those same things, but those aren’t coming out of our camp. He’s (Rhule) not talking about us, I’ll put it that way.”

It’s clear Rhule is not alone in his recent assessment of name, image and likeness costs. You wonder how long it will take before we see sweeping regulations regarding the changing landscape of college football.

Contact/Follow us @CornhuskersWire on Twitter, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Nebraska news, notes, and opinions.

Ohio State quarterback Lincoln Kienholz had a very exciting past few days

The Buckeye backup is having himself a week! #GoBucks

It’s a right of passage for [autotag]Ohio State football[/autotag] players to have their black stripe removed and to officially become a member of the program.

It may have taken freshman quarterback [autotag]Lincoln Kienholz[/autotag] a bit longer than some of his teammates to lose his stipe, but it happened on Thursday afternoon. The former 4-star prospect who was named theUSA TODAY national high school athlete of the year, not just for football, as he was a star on the baseball diamond and basketball court as well.

Although we won’t see Kienholz much this fall, the future is bright for the young man, who could be in the mix for the starting spot next year depending on player movement.

That was Kienholz’s Thursday, and on Friday he got the cherry on top. A Name, image and likeness deal with [autotag]Byers Audi of Columbus[/autotag] got the Buckeye quarterback a nice new Audi Q5 to ride around campus.

Not his first NIL deal, Kienholz also signed with [autotag]Tommy John[/autotag] clothing line. It literally pays to be an Ohio State quarterback, even the backups.

Contact/Follow @BuckeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Ohio State news, notes, and opinion. Follow Michael Chen on X.