Detroit Lions Podcast: Offseason work underway episode and win predictions

Detroit Lions Podcast: Offseason work underway episode, Jared Goff contract, Brodric Martin’s new bod and win predictions

The latest live recording of the Detroit Lions Podcast is now available to watch or stream. In this episode, hosts Chris and Jeff are back to bring you the latest Detroit Lions news and information.

We’ll talk about the win total lines on Detroit Lions season and how much things have changed from recent years. There are some Lions front office departures to Washington to discuss and break down how the Lions can replace Brandon Sosna.

Second-year DT Brodric Martin has transformed his physique, while Jared Goff has transformed his bank account with a lucrative new contract extension. Both are discussed in detail, including a look at the future salary cap ramifications of Goff’s deal.

The show ends with a game-by-game prediction on how the Lions’ 2024 season will turn out.

https://www.youtube.com/live/t-2zaIu_iek?si=8CU6b7czbjLoEzUz

The audio-only version of the show is available from your favorite podcast provider.

Jared Goff got the security and the no-trade clause he wanted in his new contract

Lions QB Jared Goff got the security and the no-trade clause he wanted in his new $212 million contract

Jared Goff officially signed his new contract extension with the Detroit Lions on Thursday morning. To celebrate, Detroit’s franchise quarterback held a press conference to discuss the newfound $200-plus million deal.

Despite the gaudy figures in the deal, which will pay him an average of $53 million per season through 2028, Goff insisted it wasn’t the money that was important to him.

“It was mostly security,” Goff stated. “I think you can go back and forth on the numbers and whatnot, but that wasn’t really the thing that was something that I was ever extremely concerned with. (It was) the security and the no-trade clause.”

The no-trade clause was not something that was widely disseminated about Goff’s new deal.

That’s certainly a credible angle for Goff, who was traded to Detroit not long after signing his last contract extension with the Los Angeles Rams. More control over his own fate is something that clearly appealed to Goff, as was the desire to finish his revitalized career in a Lions uniform.

“This city means so much to me now and it will hold a special place in my heart forever,” Goff said. “I just want to win for them. I want to win for these fans.”

[lawrence-related id=106853]

Detroit Lions Podcast: Bish and Brown on the Lions 2024 NFL Draft class and Goff extension

Detroit Lions Podcast: Lions Wire’s Scott Bischoff and Russ Brown break down the Lions 2024 NFL Draft class and Goff extension

Russell Brown and Scott Bischoff return on the Detroit Lions Podcast! In this episode, the guys talk about the following:

  • In-depth analysis on each draft pick from the Lions 2024 NFL Draft Class
  • Terrion Arnold and Ennis Rakestraw give the Lions a long-term plan at cornerback.
  • They have a day 3 pick that could start right now?
  • The final segment of the show is about the Jared Goff extension with the Lions.

The guys get into all that and more right here on the Detroit Lions Podcast! Be sure to rate, review and subscribe to the show with YouTube, Apple Podcast, Spotify and wherever you get your favorite shows!

Breakdown on Jared Goff’s new contract with the Detroit Lions

Breakdown on Jared Goff’s new contract extension with the Detroit Lions

As expected, the Detroit Lions agreed to a contract extension with quarterback Jared Goff on Monday. The contract is a 4-year extension worth $212 million dollars.

Per Albert Breer, the contract extension is broken down as:

  • $73 million signing bonus.
  • $125 million over the first two years.
  • $165 million over the first three years.
  • $57 million in 2028, which is an option year.

While it’s a lot of money with a lot of guarantees, it’s the going rate for quarterbacks. Especially the quarterbacks that win football games and that’s exactly what Jared Goff has been doing. Over Goff’s last 27 games, he’s gone 20-7 and he helped get the Lions their first Division Championship since 1992. Additionally, he helped get the Lions to the NFC Championship game.

Sure, some people will say that “QB wins” don’t matter but it sure feels like the organizations in the NFL value those wins. Especially since if a quarterback isn’t winning football games, he tends to lose his job as a starter in the NFL.

Whether you love or hate Goff as a quarterback and the new contract extension he received, you can’t deny that he deserved a new deal. He was dealt to Detroit and was essentially written off as a player in this league. Three years later and he’s rejuvenated the city of Detroit, the Lions football team and most importantly, his career. Cheers to several more years of chanting the name, Jared Goff! Jared Goff! Jared Goff!

 

Jared Goff could get traded by the Rams, so does Washington make sense?

New reports are showing that the Rams are open to trading QB Jared Goff, so where does Washington fit in that mix, and would they even want him?

A lot of our time over the past few weeks has been focused on which quarterback the Washington Football Team is likely to end up with at the start of the 2021 season.

Many have their eyes set on guys like Deshaun Watson, or Matthew Stafford, or Dak Prescott, or Matt Ryan; all guys who could be picked up in free agency or via trade for some high-prices. However, a new name has entered the chat: Los Angeles Rams QB Jared Goff.

A report from The Athletic shows that the Rams are starting to engage in some “exploratory trade talks,” according to Jourdan Rodrigue, with the ultimate goal to bring Stafford back to LA to run Sean McVay’s offense. With a high cap number after signing a new contract within the last couple of years and an apparent regression, it seems that the Goff experience in LA might be coming to an end.

That means if the Rams deem a quarterback worth trading for and are able to execute such a transaction, they would be willing to eat $22.2 million in dead-cap money, plus the new quarterback’s salary. They also could trade Goff after June 1 (an extremely rare scenario, though there is league precedent) for a relatively small total of $6.8 million in dead money in 2021 (plus $15.4 million in 2022).

So, like we said up top, Jared Goff’s name has now entered the chat of quarterbacks who are likely to be on the move this offseason. However, does that mean that Washington should be interested? It’s clear that they need a new guy under center going forward, but is Goff the guy?

Ask that question two years ago, and the answer is definitely yes. Ask that question now, and you’ll likely get a response that ranges from slightly-timid to aggressively against. What happened?

Well, a young player with a high ceiling was seemingly exposed by the New England Patriots in the Super Bowl a couple of years back, where he was held to 229 yards and 1 INT, being held out of the endzone in a 13-3 snoozer. Since then, things have fallen off a bit for Goff, and we can’t really figure out why. Check out these stats from Goff in both 2017 and 2018, compared to what he’s done in 2019 and 2020:

2017-2018: 24-7 record, 8492 yards, 60 TD, 65.3% completion, 19 INT

2019-2020: 18-13 record, 8590 yards, 42 TD, 64.95% completion, 29 INT

With a high-flying offense like the Rams have, Goff is apparently not the guy that McVay envisions running it going forward, but that doesn’t mean he can’t still have a solid career in the NFL. If Washington were to be interested, it would cost them significantly less to acquire Goff than someone like Stafford or Watson, simply because they’d more being doing LA a favor by getting him off their books. However, a Goff acquisition would likely not sit over very well with the fanbase in D.C., as he lacks a star factor that is so desired to head up this offense.

Goff feels more like a last-resort acquisition, mainly because of his regression, and that frighteningly big contract that he brings with him. At this point, though, it feels that his name has to at least be mentioned.

[listicle id=46477]