College Football Power Five Sleeper Teams: 20 For 2020 Offseason Topics No. 9

20 for 2020 key college football offseason topics: No. 9. Every Power Five league’s sleeper team. 

[jwplayer i5t0eSnp]


20 for 2020 key college football offseason topics: No. 9. Every Power Five league’s sleeper team. 


Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

Really? Last offseason you actually thought that Baylor was going to be a player in the College Football Playoff chase?

You thought Virginia could end up in the Orange Bowl, and Illinois actually had a shot at going bowling?

Okay … we had those last two in the 2019 version of this, but please cheerfully ignore just how off we were on everything else. (Arkansas … really?)

Of course the Alabamas, Oklahomas, Clemsons and Ohio States of the world are going to do what they do, but other Power Five fan bases want to have some fun, too.

It’s always fun when teams rise up and be a factor? Which Power Five programs could be this year’s Minnesota, Louisville or Tennessee?

ACC: NC State Wolfpack

It was a whole lot of ugly last season.

NC State had turned into a consistent rock under head coach Dave Doeren – going to five straight bowls and winning nine games two years in a row before 2019. But last year was supposed to be a bit of a rebuilding campaign.

That should’ve meant winning six games and fighting to get into a bowl, but instead, all of the wheels came off with a six-game losing streak to finish up the season against a relatively easy schedule.

Let’s try this again.

The schedule is still relatively easy.

There’s a trip to Clemson that’s as tough as it gets, and the regular season is bookended by road games at Louisville and North Carolina, but that’s about it.

Oh sure, Mississippi State is a tough non-conference game, but that’s at home. Outside of the trip to Death Valley, the two other road games in the middle ten are at Troy and Syracuse.

Fine, but is the team any better after having major quarterback issues, massive turnover problems, and with the defense not able to overcome the problems on the other side?

QB Matt McKay is transferring to Montana State, but there’s a great chance that almost all of the offensive two-deep depth chart will be back. The hope will be that last year was a big step back to potentially see a giant leap forward, and for the D to be far stronger with nine of the top 12 tacklers are expected to return.

NC State Schedule & Analysis

NEXT: Big Ten Sleeper

Group Of Five Teams In New Year’s Six Bowl Chase: 20 For 2020 Offseason Topics No. 10

20 for 2020 key college football offseason topics: The top Group of Five teams that should be in the New Year’s Six bowl chase.

[jwplayer UUYEqhNZ]


20 for 2020 key offseason topics: No. 10 The top Group of Five teams that should be in the New Year’s Six bowl chase.


Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

Okay, so we whiffed in last year’s preseason 5 Teams In the New Year’s Six bowl chase piece – didn’t get Memphis, and didn’t have Appalachian State on the list – but that’s a good thing. It’s more fun when it’s not an automatic call.

Houston, Boise State, Western Michigan, UCF twice, and then Memphis. Those are your Group of Five champions who got the automatic bids to the available New Year’s Six game in the College Football Playoff era.

It’s not the CFP, but it’s still a high honor.

All five teams represented themselves well, with the Group of Fivers going 3-3 since the bowl slot was created.

This year, the highest-ranked conference champion from the American Athletic, Conference USA, MAC, Mountain West and Sun Belt will automatically get one spot in either the College Football Playoff, GoodYear Cotton Bowl, Fiesta Bowl or Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl.

To be the team that gets the job done, unless things go totally wacky, 1) it has to go unbeaten or finish with one loss, 2) it will need at least one signature win, and 3) as part of the requirement, it has to win its Group of Five championship.

Which six teams this season have the best shot at getting into the spotlight game?

6. San Diego State Aztecs

Brady Hoke is inheriting a nice team to play around with.

The Aztecs might not have the defense of the last several seasons, but the offense should be stronger, Georgia Tech’s Lucas Johnson is transferring in to battle for the quarterback job, and the offensive front should be among the best in the Mountain West.

Last year’s team had a few whiffs along the way when the offense didn’t work, but all three losses came by six points or fewer.

Going to Toledo won’t be easy, and a run of four road games in six will be tough, but the one Power Five game is at home against UCLA, and there’s no Boise State to deal with in the regular season.

The road games at Nevada, Utah State, Wyoming, BYU and Fresno State might be too much to go unbeaten, but the team should be in the hunt throughout the year.

San Diego State Schedule Analysis

NEXT: Group Of Five Teams In New Year’s Six Bowl Chase, No. 5

Most College Football Wins Rankings 1-130: 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis

Ranking every college football team on how many FBS they have over the last five years – 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis.

[jwplayer 67QTtsxr]


How many wins did you get? It’s what the games are all about – the wins. Ranking every college football team on how many FBS they have over the last five years, it’s the 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis.


Contact @PeteFiutak

Did you win? For all the talk about the student in student-athlete, and for all the pomp and circumstance, all that matters is whether or not you win college football games.

Who won the most games over the last five years against other FBS teams? Wins against FCS programs don’t count here – you don’t get credit for the cupcake in the CFN 5-Year Program Analysis.

Remember, these are ONLY the wins over the FBS teams.

130 Kansas

5-Year FBS Win Total: 6
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 130

T128 UTEP

5-Year FBS Win Total: 8
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 118

T128 Texas State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 8
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T122

127 Oregon State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 9
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 126

T125 UConn

5-Year FBS Win Total: 10
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 124

T125 Rutgers

5-Year FBS Win Total: 10
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 117

T122 Rice

5-Year FBS Win Total: 11
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T113

T122 UMass

5-Year FBS Win Total: 11
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T120

T122 Coastal Carolina

5-Year FBS Win Total: 11
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T128

T120 Liberty

5-Year FBS Win Total: 12
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T128

T120 Kent State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 12
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 127

119 Ball State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 13
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T120

T117 East Carolina

5-Year FBS Win Total: 14
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T106

T117 San Jose State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 14
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T122

T115 Charlotte

5-Year FBS Win Total: 15
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 125

T115 South Alabama

5-Year FBS Win Total: 15
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T101

T113 New Mexico State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 16
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T113

T113 UNLV

5-Year FBS Win Total: 16
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 119

T110 Maryland

5-Year FBS Win Total: 17
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T97

T110 Illinois

5-Year FBS Win Total: 17
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T113

T110 ULM

5-Year FBS Win Total: 17
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T110

109 Arkansas

5-Year FBS Win Total: 18
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T88

T105 UTSA

5-Year FBS Win Total: 19
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T101

T105 Bowling Green

5-Year FBS Win Total: 19
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T82

T105 New Mexico

5-Year FBS Win Total: 19
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T88

T105 Vanderbilt

5-Year FBS Win Total: 19
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T106

104 Akron

5-Year FBS Win Total: 20
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T82

NEXT: 5 Year Program Analysis Top 100 in FBS Wins

Most College Football Wins Rankings By Conference: 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis

It’s what the games are all about – the wins. The rankings of the college football teams with the most FBS wins by conference. 

[jwplayer 67QTtsxr]


Winning is everything. It’s what the games are all about – the wins. How many did you get? Here are the rankings of the college football teams with the most FBS wins by conference. 


Contact @PeteFiutak

Who won the most games over the last five years against other FBS teams? Wins against FCS program don’t count here – you don’t get credit for the cupcake in the CFN Five-Year Program Analysis.

This is why we’re all here … you play to win the game.

Who had the most FBS wins over the last five years by conference?

American Athletic East

1 Temple

5-Year FBS Win Total: 40
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T28

2 UCF

5-Year FBS Win Total: 37
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T36

3 USF

5-Year FBS Win Total: 35
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T39

4 Cincinnati

5-Year FBS Win Total: 33
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T58

5 East Carolina

5-Year FBS Win Total: 14
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T106

6 UConn

5-Year FBS Win Total: 10
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 124


American Athletic West

1 Memphis

5-Year FBS Win Total: 42
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T21

T2 Houston

5-Year FBS Win Total: 37
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T17

T2 Navy

5-Year FBS Win Total: 37
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T46

4 SMU

5-Year FBS Win Total: 26
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T110

5 Tulsa

5-Year FBS Win Total: 23
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T97

6 Tulane

5-Year FBS Win Total: 21
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T110

[lawrence-related id=509973]

ACC Atlantic

1 Clemson

5-Year FBS Win Total: 64
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 3

2 Florida State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 33
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T21

T3 NC State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 31
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T39

T3 Louisville

5-Year FBS Win Total: 31
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T52

5 Wake Forest

5-Year FBS Win Total: 28
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T88

6 Boston College

5-Year FBS Win Total: 25
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T76

7 Syracuse

5-Year FBS Win Total: 22
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T101


ACC Coastal

1 Miami

5-Year FBS Win Total: 35
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T39

2 Virginia Tech

5-Year FBS Win Total: 34
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T46

3 Pitt

5-Year FBS Win Total: 31
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T68

4 Duke

5-Year FBS Win Total: 27
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T58

5 North Carolina

5-Year FBS Win Total: 26
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 81

6 Virginia

5-Year FBS Win Total: 25
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T97

7 Georgia Tech

5-Year FBS Win Total: 23
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T63

[lawrence-related id=509949]

Big Ten East

1 Ohio State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 61
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 2

2 Penn State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 48
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 9

3 Michigan

5-Year FBS Win Total: 47
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T12

4 Michigan State

5-Year FBS Win Total: 38
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T17

5 Indiana

5-Year FBS Win Total: 27
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T88

6 Maryland

5-Year FBS Win Total: 17
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T97

7 Rutgers

5-Year FBS Win Total: 10
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 117


Big Ten West

1 Wisconsin

5-Year FBS Win Total: 52
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): 5

2 Iowa

5-Year FBS Win Total: 45
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T17

3 Northwestern

5-Year FBS Win Total: 38
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T26

4 Minnesota

5-Year FBS Win Total: 36
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T49

5 Nebraska

5-Year FBS Win Total: 27
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T63

6 Purdue

5-Year FBS Win Total: 21
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T106

7 Illinois

5-Year FBS Win Total: 17
2019 FBS Win National Ranking (2018 season): T113

NEXT: Big 12, Conference USA, Independents FBS Wins

Great Players About To Go Nuclear: 20 For 2020 Offseason Topics No. 11

20 for 2020, 20 key offseason topics: No. 11 The college football players who are already terrific, but are about to go to another level.

[jwplayer CxWjsKfy]


20 for 2020 key offseason topics: No. 11 The college football players who are already terrific, but are about to go to a whole other level.


Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

They were among the best players in college football in 2019, but they either flew a bit under the radar or they didn’t become household names. That’s about to change.

The perfect player who fits the description was on last year’s list. Oklahoma State RB Chuba Hubbard is back, but he’s an established superstar. These five are on the verge of being there.

5. QB Sam Howell, Soph. North Carolina

He’s not all that big, and he’s not all that mobile, and he doesn’t have the biggest arm, but as a true freshman, he showed it.

Originally a key part of Willie Taggart’s 2019 Florida State recruiting class, Mack Brown and company swooped in and flipped Howell to be the main man to run the North Carolina offense. In a rebuilding job, the hope was for the true freshman to be ready right away, and then let him work through his mistakes as the team matured and the talent started to come in.

Instead, Howell came out rocking, bombing away for 245 yards and two touchdowns in the season-opening win over South Carolina, and hitting Miami for 274 yards and two scores with no picks in either one.

The Tar Heels won both games, and the season was off and running.

There were a string of losses the middle of the season, but Howell handled himself like a seasoned pro in close game after close game.

There were a few multi-interception games – the two in the loss to Appalachian State were a problem – but he only threw seven picks on the season and had two or more touchdown passes in every game.

He needs to be more consistent, he took a few too many chances, and there were too many misfires in key moments, but for a true freshman to hit 61% of his passes for 3,641 yards and 38 touchdowns with just seven interceptions in his first year, he wasn’t bad.

NEXT: The best pass rusher you probably don’t know, Part 1

Daily Cavalcade: Can There Be A 2020 College Football Season? You Have 4 Months, Athletic Directors

Athletic directors have little time to waste if there’s going to be 2020 college football season. Everything is on the table.

[jwplayer Qpt9xkcT]


Athletic directors have little time to waste if there’s going to be 2020 college football season. Everything has to be on the table to make this happen.


Daily Cavalcade: Can There Be A 2020 College Football Season?

Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

Sorry if this take sucks, it’s not my fault …

1. I’m built for this quarantine and staying at home thing. I could do six months standing on my head.

2. If you’re angry at any aspect of this, remember, no one wants or needs a full 2020 college football season more than I do.

Really, there will be sports again. For now … just stay safe, and hope for ESPN to put out The Last Dance 30 or 30 on the Bulls as soon as humanly possible.

You have four months, college athletic directors.

Obviously, everything around the coronavirus nightmare is more important than whether or not a dumb college football game is played in late August, and of course the horrors and issues that so many are experiencing and dealing with are truly all that matter.

Our temporary reality is just getting started, but as we speak, college athletic directors are trying to do their jobs for their respective schools.

They’re trying to figure out whether or not there can, will, and should be a college football season in 2020, and they have just four months to get there.

It’s late March, and to have any sort of a working college football season to keep with the schedule as it’s currently created – supposedly kicking off on Saturday, August 29th – there has to be at least a full month for the machine to get going.

I know, I know, you’re thinking, “chill … that’s four FREAKING months away,” but considering the Tokyo Olympics have about as much chance of starting on July 24th as Jamal Murray has of reversing time and not hitting POST on his Instagram account, the sports world is already knee-deep into planning ahead for late-July and early August.

By August 1st – at the latest – college football training camps, practices, and facilities have to be up and going, especially considering there’s not going to be spring ball. However, it’s delusional for athletic directors to not at least prepare their budgets and plans just in case things don’t go off like normal this fall.

[lawrence-related id=509830]

So for now, let’s just ignore the potential that it all gets shut down for the 2020 season.

What do all the athletic directors have to be figuring out, and what possibilities are out there to give us college football again?

First things first, there is no football of any sort this year without …

1. Testing, testing, testing.

Let’s all hope and pray that the cure is coming tomorrow – and hopefully it’s some easy and awesome combination of crispy bacon and watching Blue Chips four times in a row – but even the most optimistic experts are saying it’ll be at least 12-to-18 months before one might be available, much less for mass distribution.

It’s out of the hands of the athletic directors, but until there’s a cure, by mid-July there has to be a way for every player and coach to be tested – and with quick results – to even think about starting up practices, much less getting the season going on time.

If just one player in a collision sport like this is infected, the results could be disastrous.

That’s just for the guys on the field. Athletic directors, you’re not going to like this – none of us will – but …

2. Plan on the likelihood of a season with no fans in the stands. 



If we’re not all completely and totally out of the woods by this summer, liability-wise, how can schools allow fans into the stadiums without testing every one of them before they enter?

Again, we’re almost certainly not going to have a vaccine for everyone by late August – if there is one – so even if the curve is flattened, thousands of people cramming together in stadiums all across the nation six months from now might still be a no-go.

That’s how a small-bump curve turns into Kilimanjaro in a hiccup.

And even if college football is going again and fans are allowed to attend, 1) attendance was already an issue before this, 2) have fun trying to get thousands of people to want to be around thousands of other people, and 3) good luck finding enough fans with any disposable income left.

Throw in the need for all the resources to gear up a major college football game – especially if our medical system is battling in any way after what’s predicted to come over the next few months – and the logistics of having fans show up are going to be tough.

Considering how financially disastrous it might be for most athletic departments to have no fans in the stands …

3. In case of emergency, maybe break or push off the deals for the non-conference games.

Let’s start exploring the nuclear options.

If needed, buy yourself some time, athletic directors.

Some schools cancelled non-conference games over the years because of hurricane and weather issues – same thing here.

The whole point of the cupcake games against the FCSers – and for most Power Five vs. Group of Five matchups – is to make the home team a lot of money off of the attendance in an easy win. If those fans aren’t there, the dynamic changes.

The TV revenue is still a part of the puzzle, but if schools are trying to figure out some way to have a 2020 season, limiting it to conference play gives everyone more room – like maybe starting the season in October with an eight-or-nine game slate.

And if it’s not okay in August, maybe it’ll be all clear for fans to show up again deeper into the fall.

Or, if the season really has to be pushed back …

4. If absolutely needed, blow off the bowl season outside of the New Year’s Six and College Football Playoff.

At absolute best, athletic departments break even going to bowls, and they usually lose money.

Again, it might be all about buying time and exploring every option.

If it’s not possible to have a season start up as normal in late August, what about starting several weeks later and extending the season through mid-to-late December?

It’s not ideal, and no one wants that – especially ESPN – but depending on what happens over the next few months, some season would be better than no season.

And if everything else fails and things get brutally ugly for the bottom line …

5. Have a plan in place for postponing most non-revenue sports this fall and for Spring 2021.

It would be devastating if it comes to this, and it would be an impossible sell for most athletic directors, but they have to be ready for everything.

Use the tired hope-for-the-best-prepare-for-the-worst cliché that’s on the motivational poster next to “Hang In There,” with the picture of a cat in a tree.

Most non-revenue sports cost pennies compared to the monster revenue-generators, and the Title IX aspect will come into play, but athletic departments will be crushed if they’re crossing their fingers and banking on a revenue stream that doesn’t come from packed football stadiums.

And now, to take this thing totally off the rails …

6. Ice Cube?

I’ve had an idea for the NBA from the moment the season hit the pause button.

Why can’t a multi-billion dollar company like the NBA – with its multi-billionaire owners – figure out how to test and then quarantine the 20 or so necessary parts of a team, keep them away from other humans for a few months – in the name of the league and the morale of a nation – and then televise their games in an empty and sanitized-as-possible gym?

Of course, the players wouldn’t go for it, the isolation aspect wouldn’t fly, and they’d all have to be tested every other day. There are still way too many logistical issues to work through to make it all happen on a major scale.

However, Ice Cube is trying to do all of it for his BIG3 League.

Okay, college athletic directors. Is there any way to apply any of this for college football?

The overall model has no shot – there are WAY too many players, coaches, and trainers who’d have to be quarantined – but if you really want a college football season, there are parts that might work.

It’s the dream of every coach to have their players on lockdown for a few months, but if there are quick and easy tests, that might not be as much of an issue.

The travel and hotel aspect would also be a concern, along with remembering that these guys are all college students, too. Taking all the classes on-line – unless you have to – isn’t the college experience, but it’s possible.

Athletic directors, put everything on the table.

Don’t get caught flat-footed like the NCAA did with its big basketball tournament, and don’t be like the NBA and pull players off the floor at the last minute.

As long as it’s safe, and as long as we’re in a good enough position overall that it’s okay, we all want a college football season. Now it’s up to you to come up with Plans A, B, C and Q, and contingency plan after contingency plan, to try making it happen.

You have four months.

[protected-iframe id=”361699434b6d70baf15f631ed2408ac1-97672683-92922408″ info=”https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js” ]

Bad Wins Rankings 1-130: 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis

Who had the most bad wins? The 1-130 rankings of the schools with the most – and least – wins over the bad teams over the last five years.

[jwplayer Qpt9xkcT]


Who had the most bad wins? The 1-130 rankings of the schools with the most – and least – wins over the bad teams over the last five years.


Contact @PeteFiutak

They’re the wins that don’t really do much for college football as a whole, but they’re also the ones you must have to help the overall record.

They’re on the schedule, so you might as well win them.

What does it generally mean to come up with a Bad Win? You probably have an easier schedule and path if you have a few sure-things on the slate. Having a low Bad Win count, though, isn’t necessarily a horrible thing – maybe a team didn’t have a whole lot of cupcakes to eat.

Or, a team couldn’t hit the layups.

What’s a Bad Win? It’s a victory over 1) an FCS team or 2) an FBS team that finished its season with three wins or fewer.

T129 UCLA

5-Year Bad Win Total: 4
2019 Total (2018 season): 5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T127

T129 USC

5-Year Bad Win Total: 4
2019 Total (2018 season): 6
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T124

128 Kansas

5-Year Bad Win Total: 5
2019 Total (2018 season): 6
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T124

T126 Oregon State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 6
2019 Total (2018 season): 7
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T121

T126 Vanderbilt

5-Year Bad Win Total: 6
2019 Total (2018 season): 7
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T121

T122 Purdue

5-Year Bad Win Total: 7
2019 Total (2018 season): 5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T127

T122 UMass

5-Year Bad Win Total: 7
2019 Total (2018 season): 8
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T111

T122 Arizona State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 7
2019 Total (2018 season): 9
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T95

T122 Coastal Carolina

5-Year Bad Win Total: 7
2019 Total (2018 season): 3
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): 130

[lawrence-related id=509949]

T113 Rutgers

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 10
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T82

T113 Nebraska

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 8
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T111

T113 UTEP

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 9
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T95

T113 Notre Dame

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 8
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T111

T113 Utah

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 9
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T95

T113 South Carolina

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 8
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T111

T113 Arkansas

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 8
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T111

T113 Auburn

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 8
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T111

T113 Mississippi State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 9
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T95

NEXT: CFN 5-Year Program Analysis Bad Wins Top 100

Bad Wins Rankings By Conference: 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis

Who had the most bad wins over the last five years? The conference rankings of the teams with the most – and least – wins over the bad teams

[jwplayer PkCtjTd4-boEY74VG]


Who had the most bad wins over the last five years? The conference rankings of the teams with the most – and least – wins over the bad teams in the last five college football seasons.


Contact @PeteFiutak

They’re the fluff.

They’re the games that teams are supposed to win, they’re they ones that pad the final records, and they’re the games you HAVE to put away.

They’re the bad wins – wins over the easy teams on the slate. They might get ignored as the college football seasons go on, but they can be the difference between a winning and losing campaign, or they could be the reason why a team gets to go bowling.

What does this generally mean? The more Bad Wins means the easier the schedule and path to come up with a good year.

What’s a Bad Win? It’s a victory over 1) an FCS team or 2) an FBS team that finished its season with three wins or fewer.

By conference, which teams came up with the most clunkers over the last five years?

American Athletic East

1 USF

5-Year Bad Win Total: 18
2019 Total (2018 season): 20

2 Temple

5-Year Bad Win Total: 16
2019 Total (2018 season): 17

3 Cincinnati

5-Year Bad Win Total: 14
2019 Total (2018 season): 17

T4 East Carolina

5-Year Bad Win Total: 12
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

T4 UCF

5-Year Bad Win Total: 12
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

6 UConn

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 10


American Athletic West

1 Memphis

5-Year Bad Win Total: 18
2019 Total (2018 season): 21

2 Houston

5-Year Bad Win Total: 17
2019 Total (2018 season): 19

3 Tulane

5-Year Bad Win Total: 15
2019 Total (2018 season): 15

4 Navy

5-Year Bad Win Total: 12
2019 Total (2018 season): 12

T5 SMU

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 10

T5 Tulsa

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 12

[lawrence-related id=509918]

ACC Atlantic

1 Clemson

5-Year Bad Win Total: 12
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

T2 Boston College

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

T2 Louisville

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

T2 Wake Forest

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 10

T5 NC State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 12

T5 Syracuse

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 11

7 Florida State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 9
2019 Total (2018 season): 11


ACC Coastal

1 Virginia Tech

5-Year Bad Win Total: 16
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

2 Duke

5-Year Bad Win Total: 14
2019 Total (2018 season): 18

3 North Carolina

5-Year Bad Win Total: 12
2019 Total (2018 season): 11

T4 Miami

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 11

T4 Virginia

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 10

6 Georgia Tech

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 12

7 Pitt

5-Year Bad Win Total: 9
2019 Total (2018 season): 9

[lawrence-related id=509911]

Big Ten East

1 Indiana

5-Year Bad Win Total: 16
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

2 Penn State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 9

T3 Maryland

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 9

T3 Michigan State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 10

T3 Ohio State

5-Year Bad Win Total: 10
2019 Total (2018 season): 8

6 Michigan

5-Year Bad Win Total: 9
2019 Total (2018 season): 8

7 Rutgers

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 10


Big Ten West

T1 Illinois

5-Year Bad Win Total: 13
2019 Total (2018 season): 11

T1 Iowa

5-Year Bad Win Total: 13
2019 Total (2018 season): 13

3 Wisconsin

5-Year Bad Win Total: 13
2019 Total (2018 season): 14

4 Minnesota

5-Year Bad Win Total: 12
2019 Total (2018 season): 11

5 Northwestern

5-Year Bad Win Total: 11
2019 Total (2018 season): 12

6 Nebraska

5-Year Bad Win Total: 8
2019 Total (2018 season): 8

7 Purdue

5-Year Bad Win Total: 7
2019 Total (2018 season): 5

NEXT: Big 12, Conference USA, Independents Bad Wins

Bad Loss Rankings: 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis

Who had the most bad losses over the last five years? Which college football teams came up with the most clunkers?

[jwplayer 2nuDGrue]


Who had the most bad losses over the last five years? Which college football teams came up with the most clunkers?


Contact @PeteFiutak

They’re the season-cripplers.

The bad losses can ruin a campaign, crush momentum, and kill a team hoping to come up with a win against someone it’s probably supposed to beat.

So what’s a Bad Loss?

In the CFN Five-Year Program Analysis, a Bad Loss is counted as a loss to an FCS team or to a team that finishes with three wins or fewer. An extra 0.5 penalty is added on to a Bad Loss at home – those really hurt.

You do NOT want to be ranked high on this.

Again, these are losses to FCS teams or teams that finished with three wins or fewer. It’s a BAD thing to be high on the list – the lower the score, the better.

By conference, which teams came up with the most clunkers over the last five years?

CFN 5-Year Program Analysis: 0 Bad Losses

Losses to teams that finished with three losses or fewer or FCS programs. An extra 0.5 added to a Bad Loss at home.

T89 Alabama

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Appalachian State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T44

T89 Auburn

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Boise State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Clemson

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Florida

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Fresno State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Georgia

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Indiana

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Kansas State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

[lawrence-related id=509926]

T89 Kentucky

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Louisville

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 LSU

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Marshall

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Maryland

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Michigan

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Minnesota

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Mississippi State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Navy

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Ohio State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Oklahoma

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Oklahoma State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Ole Miss

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Oregon

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Oregon State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Penn State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Purdue

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 San Diego State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Southern Miss

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Stanford

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Tennessee

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Texas A&M

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Troy

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56

T89 UCLA

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Utah

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56

T89 Utah State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Virginia Tech

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

T89 Wake Forest

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56

T89 Washington

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 West Virginia

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T89 Western Michigan

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

T89 Wisconsin

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

NEXT: CFN 5-Year Program Analysis: 1 Bad Loss Score

Bad Loss Rankings By Conference: 2020 CFN 5-Year Program Analysis

Who had the most bad losses over the last five years? Which college football teams came up with the most clunkers in each conference?

[jwplayer 2nuDGrue]


Who had the most bad losses over the last five years? Which college football teams came up with the most clunkers in each conference?


Contact @PeteFiutak

They’re the season-cripplers.

The bad losses can ruin a campaign, crush momentum, and kill a team hoping to come up with a win against someone it’s probably supposed to beat.

So what’s a Bad Loss?

In the CFN Five-Year Program Analysis, a Bad Loss is counted as a loss to an FCS team or to a team that finishes with three wins or fewer. An extra 0.5 penalty is added on to a Bad Loss at home – those really hurt.

You do NOT want to be ranked high on this.

Again, these are losses to FCS teams or teams that finished with three wins or fewer. It’s a BAD thing to be high on the list – the lower the score, the better.

By conference, which teams came up with the most clunkers over the last five years?

American Athletic East

1 UConn

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 4.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T7

T2 East Carolina

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 3
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T35

T2 Temple

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 3
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T35

4 UCF

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T31

T5 Cincinnati

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T51

T5 USF

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68


American Athletic West

1 Tulsa

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 4.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T15

2 SMU

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T31

3 Tulane

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T35

T4 Houston

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T44

T4 Memphis

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

6 Navy

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

[lawrence-related id=509918]

ACC Atlantic

1 Boston College

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 3
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56

2 NC State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

T3 Florida State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

T3 Syracuse

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T5 Clemson

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T5 Louisville

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T5 Wake Forest

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56


ACC Coastal

T1 Pitt

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T44

T1 Virginia

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T44

3 North Carolina

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 2
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T51

T4 Duke

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56

T4 Georgia Tech

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T4 Miami

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

7 Virginia Tech

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

[lawrence-related id=509911]

Big Ten East

1 Rutgers

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 6.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T22

2 Michigan State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

T3 Indiana

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T3 Maryland

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T3 Michigan

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T3 Ohio State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T3 Penn State

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91


Big Ten West

1 Illinois

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 3
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T35

T2 Iowa

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T35

T2 Northwestern

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1.5
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T56

4 Nebraska

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 1
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T68

T5 Minnesota

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T5 Purdue

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

T5 Wisconsin

5-Year Conference Bad Loss Score: 0
2019 National Ranking (2018 season): T91

NEXT: Big 12, Conference USA, Independents Bad Losses