Super Bowl 2024 coin toss rules, explained: How deferring works and more

The coin toss isn’t necessarily as simple as it sounds.

Editor’s note: This story was originally published in 2023 and has been updated.

The coin toss seems like it should be the most simple part of a football game, right?

Every NFL game starts with one of these. A team calls heads or tails, and that will decide who gets to receive the football on the opening kickoff of each half of the game. Sounds easy enough.

[gambcom-standard rankid=”3011″ ]

But there’s a lot more that goes into it. It’s an essential part of how any game plays out. One wrong move from a team captain, and that squad could start slow or go into the half without the ball down a few scores. If an official mishears a player? It could throw everything off.

It’s happened before. Back in 2019 year, Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott told referee Walt Anderson that the team would defer to the second half after winning the toss. But Anderson misheard him and said the Los Angeles Rams would get the ball in the first and second halves. It was eventually corrected and Prescott made sure to say “DEFER” loud and clear a week later. But still, mistakes were made.

So just to make sure we’re clear now, here are the rules for the coin toss for Super Bowl LVIII, per the NFL’s rulebook:

Not more than three minutes before the kickoff of the first half, the Referee, in the presence of both team’s captains (limit of six per team, active, inactive or honorary) shall toss a coin at the center of the field. Prior to the Referee’s toss, the call of “heads” or “tails” must be made by the captain of the visiting team, or by the captain designated by the Referee if there is no home team. Unless the winner of the toss defers his choice to the second half, he must choose one of two privileges, and the loser is given the other. The two privileges are:

  1. The opportunity to receive the kickoff, or to kick off; or
  2. The choice of goal his team will defend.

If the coin does not turn over in the air or the toss is compromised in any way, the Referee shall toss it again. The captain’s original call may not be changed.

Penalty: For failure to comply: Loss of coin-toss option for both halves and overtime, and loss of 15 yards from the spot of the kickoff for the first half only.

For the second half, the captain who lost the pregame toss is to have the first choice of the two privileges listed in (a) or (b), unless one of the teams lost its first and second half options, or unless the winner of the pregame toss deferred his choice to the second half, in which case he must choose (a) or (b) above. Immediately prior to the start of the second half, the captains of both teams must inform the Referee of their respective choices.

A captain’s first choice from any alternative privileges listed above is final and not subject to change.

There you have it, folks.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 tag=146952]

Super Bowl 2023: Who won the coin toss? (hint: it never fails)

Here’s what history says about the team that wins the coin toss

Betting on the outcome of the coin toss in the Super Bowl is a time-honored tradition, and in 2023 it officially became one of the biggest draws at legal sportsbooks across the United States.

Those same sportsbooks will now have to pay out anyone who bet on tails.

Yet the saying “tails never fails” didn’t really bother most people who bet on the coin toss. At BetMGM heads (-105) saw the third-most wagers among prop bets behind Travis Kelce scoring the first touchdown and Travis Kelce anytime touchdown.

Over at Caesar’s Sportsbook, bettors went the opposite way, landing on tails (-102) with a little less juice.

It should be noted that the last eight teams to win the coin toss ended up losing the Super Bowl, so now might be a good time to get some live bets in.

[betwidget_gambbetmgm]

Kansas City Chiefs win coin toss, elect to defer

The Kansas City Chiefs’ Travis Kelce called heads and that is how the coin came up during the toss for Super Bowl LV. The Chiefs elected to defer.

The coin toss before the Super Bowl has become one of the more wagered upon prop bets.

On Sunday, prior to Super Bowl LV at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Fl, the Kansas City Chiefs were represented by tight end Travis Kelce. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers sent out Lavonte David, a linebacker.

The Chiefs, as the visiting team, made the call and Kelce said, “Heads.”

 Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

The coin came up heads and the Chiefs decided to defer their choice to the second half, meaning Tampa Bay would receive.

It is the 11th straight Super Bowl the team that won the coin toss opted to defer.

Out of the previous 54 Super Bowls, teams have won the coin flip and the game. In fact, there is a sizable streak currently going on as each team to win the coin toss the past six years has wound up losing. The last team to win the toss and hoist the Lombardi Trophy at the end of the night was the 2013-14 Seattle Seahawks against the Denver Broncos.

 

‘A weird start,’ but coin flip fiasco speaks to Cowboys’ confusion in 2019

The jokes flew via social media during the first half, with an easy punch line about how only a Jason Garrett-led team could screw up the pregame coin flip. In the moment, though, when the entire civilized world thought the Cowboys had voluntarily …

The jokes flew via social media during the first half, with an easy punch line about how only a Jason Garrett-led team could screw up the pregame coin flip. In the moment, though, when the entire civilized world thought the Cowboys had voluntarily given the first possession of both halves of the game to the visiting Rams, it indeed seemed like Dallas had, in fact, managed to somehow shoot themselves in the foot before the gun was even loaded. Luckily, it turned out to be something of a non-issue, thanks to a 21-point Cowboys halftime lead that made who got the ball to start the third quarter a relatively trivial detail.

After Dallas rolled to a 44-21 victory, the bizarre coin flip fiasco was back to being a source of comic relief for a team that hasn’t had much to be lighthearted about in nearly a month.

“Definitely a weird start,” quarterback Prescott said in his postgame press conference. “We wanted to set adversity there instead of on the field, so we could play from behind immediately.”

Prescott was joking, of course, about the team’s frequent and maddening habit of putting themselves behind the 8-ball, as they’ve done in each of their seven losses on the season. Rocky starts and mental gaffes have plagued the Cowboys all year, but announcing the team’s intentions during the coin toss shouldn’t be this hard.

One would think.

“Depends on the strategy, right?” Prescott explained afterward to the media. “You can say ‘Defer,’ and that means you want the ball in the second half. You can ‘Kick it,’ and kick it both halves. Or you say ‘Receive’ and ‘We want it.’ So there’s a lot of options.”

When asked what he did, in fact, say, Prescott brought the house down with his deadpan reply: “A little bit of everything. There’s audio to it.”

“Just bad use of words by me,” Prescott confessed.

But defensive end DeMarcus Lawrence, standing right next to Prescott during the pregame ceremony, threw himself under the bus for causing the controversy.

“Well, it was my fault, actually,” Lawrence told reporters after the game. “I wanted defense to go out first. I felt like we had a lot of energy, wanting to get it off our chest. We had something to prove- especially after that playoff loss [to the Rams in last year’s playoffs]… We [were] going to receive the ball, but I told him to kick it. Defer it. But once you say, ‘Kick,’ I think that means you’re kicking off and you’ve got to kick off the second half. I don’t know, but we were supposed to say ‘Defer.” That was the confusion, but it’s all good.”

It’s “all good” only because the league stepped in and intervened at halftime. Officials in New York contacted game referee Walt Anderson’s crew in Arlington with word that Prescott had, in fact, used the word defer, even though it had come well after he originally- and quite clearly- said kick. Rather than abide by what Prescott actually said, the league granted Prescott what he had obviously meant.

Of the rule, “It says that we can get involved, replay can, as far as game-administration issues: downs, enforcements, things like that,” NFL senior vice president of officiating Al Riveron said, via ESPN. “So, by rule, we can get involved. This is a game-administration issue, not a judgment call, for example. And we have definite audio that refers to deferring.”

The league was arguably under no obligation, though, to alter the referee’s on-the-field decision. The attention given to the matter during the FOX Sports telecast may have given the mix-up some much-needed clarity. Even head coach Jason Garrett was unsure of what had happened until he was brought up to speed by a member of the broadcast crew.

“Dak had told me that he used the word ‘defer’ out there,” Garrett told the media, “so we felt like we had a case there; they needed to kind of hear it. And then I was actually coming into the locker room, and Erin Andrews made me aware that there was some audio that they were going to refer back to.”

By the time Garrett called in to Dallas radio station 105.3 The Fan for his weekly interview, he was ready to brush off the whole mess.

“It all worked out,” Garrett said.

Yes, but the scenario could have easily taken a different turn: had the league chosen to stick to Walt Anderson’s call, had TV cameras not picked up the audio of the actual exchange, or had it been just a one-score game or less to start the second half. Even as a strange sidenote to the contest that followed, the scene might now turn a spotlight on a part of each and every game that fans, coaches, and even players apparently take for granted.

Why does the start of every NFL game hinge on the use of a single confusing magic word? Why is there even an option for a team to kick off to start both halves?

But beyond the mechanics that go into the standard pregame coin flip, Cowboys fans would be justifiably screaming a much different tune Monday morning if “Defergate,” as some were calling it, had genuinely played a role in the game’s outcome. Why is DeMarcus Lawrence apparently deciding possession based on his own gut feeling? Isn’t starting on offense or defense and facing one direction or the other all part of a predetermined team strategy? Shouldn’t all the team captains at the coin flip go to midfield already knowing exactly what they’re calling if given the chance? How does the starting quarterback not know the proper procedure, as archaic as the involved word choice might be? Doesn’t all of the above uncertainty ultimately fall on the coaches? All of the obvious kidding aside, how can Garrett’s team not have this figured out?

It may just be silly decorum and magic words that didn’t even decide a game. But if the Cowboys aren’t disciplined enough to handle the intracacies of a coin flip cleanly, what does that really say about the men in the locker room? About the men who lead them?

“Able to listen to the audio, we got it figured out, but just wasn’t the best,” Prescott said. “Wasn’t the cleanest coin flip I’ve been a part of.”

Prescott said it with a smile, but imagine if the Rams had gotten the ball to start both halves. Imagine if they had scored both times. Imagine if that had been the difference in the final outcome. In a season where questionable officiating has hurt the Cowboys, this time it was the officials who inexplicably saved Dallas from embarrassment.

“They did a good job, you know,” Lawrence said of the referees. “They’re supposed to do their job. I mean, they understand.”

But fans don’t understand. They may laugh now about the silly close call of the coin toss, but the snafu really speaks to much deeper problems with this team’s leadership. And what needs to happen in order to fix that may no longer be a 50/50 proposition.

[vertical-gallery id=636536][vertical-gallery id=636168][vertical-gallery id=636009][lawrence-newsletter]

Heads or tails? A look at the Geno Smith coin toss controversy

The Seattle Seahawks won the coin toss in overtime against the San Francisco 49ers, but did quarterback Geno Smith say heads or tails?

After the clock flashed zeros in regulation on Monday evening against the San Francisco 49ers, Seattle Seahawks backup quarterback Geno Smith strolled onto the field with the roar of the sideline behind him chanting his name.

Smith, along with 49ers cornerback Richard Sherman, met with referee Alex Kemp before he tossed a silver dollar to determine which team would get the ball in overtime.

What happened next has been a source of controversy for the last few days.

As the representative of the visiting team, Smith was asked to call heads or tails. The call was heads, the coin showed heads and Seattle had the first chance to score in overtime.

That, seemingly, was the end of it.

However, many people felt that Smith actually said tails and that Kemp misheard him and awarded the Seahawks the ball unfairly.

It sounds pretty clear on the TV audio that Smith said “heads,” and surely Sherman would have “griped” — as coach Pete Carroll put it — had the referee made such a huge mistake.

However, other versions make it sound like Smith said “tails,” including this one, although it’s pretty easy to manipulate audio files.

Smith confirmed he said heads and explained he always says the opposite of whatever Russell Wilson called before the opening kickoff.

Smith also had poked a little fun at the brouhaha on Twitter.

Fans, and even Carroll, have likened the “controversy” to the “laurel/yanny” debate that took the internet by storm last year, or the dress that appeared to some people to be blue and black but looked yellow and white to others.

In the grand scheme of things, the coin toss didn’t end up mattering. The Seahawks failed to score on the opening drive, and the teams remained tied until Jason Myers finally hit the game-winner on the final play.

[lawrence-related id=50989]