College Football Playoff Expansion Proposal: Who Wins? What’s Next In The Process?

The 12-team College Football Playoff expansion idea took a step forward. If it goes through, who wins? Who loses, and what’s next?

The 12-team College Football Playoff expansion idea took a step forward. If it goes through, who wins? Who loses, and what’s next in the process?


Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

The College Football Playoff types just held a meeting to set up another meeting to have a discussion about the 12-team expansion idea thrown out there last week. Basically …

– Nothing will be decided until September. This is all a work in progress.

– Everyone is trying to do their due diligence. They want the feedback from the schools, college presidents, athletic departments, etc. to try getting this right.

– If it goes through, this can’t and won’t be put in place for the 2021 or 2022 seasons. 2023 is the earliest that this could happen.

So what is this College Football Playoff expansion proposal the kids are all talking about? If it happens, who would win, who’d lose, and what would it be?

Here’s the gist of the expanded College Football Playoff proposal and how this is expected to work … if it actually happens.

– 12 teams. The six top-ranked conference champions are automatically in no matter where they’re ranked.

– The top four ranked conference champions get a first round bye. The other eight teams play a first round playoff game on the home sites of the higher-ranked teams.

– The quarterfinals are played in bowl game. There’s no reseed – more on that later – and the six needed bowls have yet to be determined. However, just assume that they’d be the Rose, Sugar, Peach, Cotton, Orange and Fiesta with another site for the national championship.

– The four-team College Football Playoff would then go on as we know it now. So, essentially, if any of the top four seeds got to the national championship, it would play one extra game. The other eight seeds – if one got to the championship – would play two extra games.

[lawrence-related id=532171]

They actually might have gotten this … right? I’m the first to hammer and criticize anything and everything when it comes to how the college football sausage is made, and there are certainly a few things about this that need to be – and will have to be – tweaked, but this is a solid plan that appears to have addressed almost all of the potential concerns and objections.

I know. I KNOW. We all want to find flaws. (Not-so-humble flex alert) I’ve done about 30 different radio appearances since this idea first came out, and like all good sports talk people, most of the hosts tried to create a debate. There isn’t really one to be had – this is as solid an idea as the playoff types have come up with.

Let’s start with the most fundamental question of all when it comes to an expanded College Football Playoff. Does it diminish – or worse yet, ruin – the integrity of the best regular season in American sports?

The last thing college football wants is to become college basketball, or the NBA, or MLB, or the NHL – you don’t need to watch a lick of any of those other leagues/sports until the playoffs.

That’s not happening here with this 12-team plan. On the flip side, with more teams and fan bases involved, it would make the regular season even more interesting.

Now the conference championships become a whole lot bigger. They actually serve as early round playoff games, with the Power Five winners almost certainly getting in.

One key thing to remember … it’s really, really hard to finish in the top 12 in college football. This isn’t the NCAA Tournament that takes everyone who can dribble. Getting into the top 12 would be an achievement.

Before going any further, I’ll keep referencing the importance of finishing in the top 12, because that’s the criteria as it’s being set up. In reality, though, you probably have to finish in the top 11 if you don’t win your conference championship, and you really want to be in the top ten just to be safe. In most years, that 12th-ranked team will be bounced out of the CFP by the sixth-best conference champion.

So who wins out of all of this, besides the College Football Playoff? Pretty much everyone.

The Group of Five programs win. Now, instead of being thrown the stale New Year’s Six Bowl game cookie for the top Group of Five conference champion, that team gets into the College Football Playoff. Last year, both Cincinnati and Coastal Carolina would’ve made it under this format.

The biggest of the big boys win. A segment of Ohio State fans got grouchy – grouchy Ohio State fans, is there another kind? – over how this was originally set up, but it’s actually fantastic for the most powerful of the Power Five.

Now, Alabama, Clemson, Oklahoma and Ohio State don’t have to finish in the top four, and they’re almost always going to finish in the top 11 or 12. Even better, there’s a safety net in case one of them loses once or even twice along the way.

Let’s cement this belief system right here, right now. If you can’t win your conference championship, and if you can’t finish in the top 12, you don’t deserve a shot at winning the national title.

Fans of good non-conference games win. Go ahead and schedule that monster date against another powerhouse. The upside to winning is enormous, and the penalty for losing – now, lose twice in a season and you’re essentially sunk – isn’t all that bad as long as the game was competitive.

Notre Dame wins. There’s some grousing from the Irish types about how the program can’t get one of the first round byes in this conference champion-only format, but sort of like it is for the other giant programs, this takes the pressure off. Notre Dame doesn’t have to finish in the top four to be in the playoff. Just be ranked in the top 11.

The SEC really wins. It’s been the constant problem with life in the SEC. You can be fantastic, have an awesome season, go 10-2 with a few thrilling wins over great teams, and then have absolutely nothing to show for it.

Or, like Texas A&M last year, you can be outstanding, and your one big crime is losing on the road to Alabama. And that means …

Georgia wins. Texas A&M wins. LSU wins. Florida wins. Auburn wins. In years when Alabama is an untouchable juggernaut – or like 2019 LSU – now at least the best teams in the top conference can still make the playoff tournament a battle. And that means …

The SEC championship loser wins. I’ll still argue that Texas A&M should’ve been in over Notre Dame last year, and there were a times when Georgia or Alabama really were among the four best teams but didn’t win the conference title.

This goes for the other Power Five conferences, too. The season-long powerhouse can lose the conference title and still get in.

Again, the Power Five conference championship games win. Will Northwestern ever finish in the top four under the current four-team College Football Playoff format? Almost certainly not.

How about Iowa State – a program that’s never won an outright conference title in its history? Under this format, both of those schools would’ve gone into their respective conference championship games last year with a chance to go to the playoff.

Wisconsin wins. And Penn State. And USC, Texas, Texas A&M, Florida, and yes, Harbaugh haters, Michigan.

All of those big-name, big power programs who’ve had plenty of success over the last few years with no playoff appearances will now get a shot. Wisconsin holds the distinction of being the winningest Power Five program during the CFP era to not get in.

The College Football Playoff wins. Last year might have been the final straw. On the plus side, the CFP has been a powerhouse mini-tournament of amazing teams. On the down side, the last three national championships suuuuuuuuuucked, and too many of the semifinals have been brutal blowouts. Of course …

There’s going to be a whole lot of ugly with this. This isn’t the NCAA Tournament where Central Whatever State can come out and hit a bajillion three pointers over a weekend and get into the Sweet 16. There will be a bunch of 55-3 blastings, and this doesn’t necessarily solve the problem of needing a more competitive final four, but …

It’s all about getting a chance. Did anyone really think Cincinnati could’ve won the national title last year? How about some of those great UCF teams? How about any of the teams outside of Alabama, Clemson and Ohio State ranked in the final top 12. Nah, but that’s not the point. All any team wants is its chance to show what it can do. If it gets rolled, it gets rolled – players want to compete.

And that’s the real winner here. It’s one of the fatal flaws of college football that – as you read this – at least 75 teams are already effectively eliminated from winning the 2021 national championship. Now, in fall camp, every single team in college football can at least think there’s a dream of a chance to get into the playoff.

With that said, who loses?

Not to be cheeky, but … the losers. There’s only one winner of the College Football Playoff. Everyone else suffers a loss. Don’t discount how much coaches and athletic directors love ending the season with a bowl win.

The Pac-12 and Big 12 … maybe. More often than not, the top SEC and Big Ten teams are likely going to be in. It wouldn’t be crazy to have half the playoff made up of those two conferences. What’s the revenue dispersion going to be? How mad would a Power Five conference be if it got shut out, like the Pac-12 would’ve been last year?

Potentially, the players. However, this all might tie together with the new Name, Image & Likeness world – because the term NIL makes everyone sleepy – in that the top players could market themselves come playoff time. Bigger stage, brighter lights, more opportunities. But that’s just for the superstars.

For the rank and file players, they’re about to make a whole lot of money for other people.

Potentially, the No. 1 seed. Without a reseed after the first round, the No. 4 could effectively get the reward the 1 should’ve had.

If this was 2014, and if Boise State upset Baylor in the first round, that would’ve meant the No. 4 seed would’ve played the CFP 20th-ranked team and the No. 1 seed would’ve played the 8/9 winner. That effectively nullifies the advantage to being the 1.

The bowl season, depending on how this gets set up. The minor bowls will always be the minor bowls – the mediocre teams will still get to go have their fun – but the mid-range bowls totally lose their importance.

2020 might have exposed how unnecessary the end-of-season exhibitions are, but the expanded CFP really does crush the spirits of those teams outside of the top 12.

Again, remember, this is just a proposal. However, it would’ve have come this far already if the College Football Playoff types didn’t pretty much know that this would fly.

Now, just watch. The next two four-team College Football Playoffs will be epic and fans will be against change, but this is a must.

The College Football Playoff is probably going to expand, and it’ll be okay.

[protected-iframe id=”361699434b6d70baf15f631ed2408ac1-97672683-92922408″ info=”https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js” ]

New 12-team College Football Playoff model has its limitations

This new model would fundamentally change college football. There are things to like but it’s far from a perfect system.

[mm-video type=video id=01f7xrs5cvnmc0vfeast playlist_id=none player_id=01f1jz1vgtfhzk6ner image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01f7xrs5cvnmc0vfeast/01f7xrs5cvnmc0vfeast-c84aca78336b994d592a2f3fc8aec90b.jpg]

The College Football Playoff expanding to 12 teams appears inevitable at this point, and though the model being suggested would solve a number of problems that plague the current system, especially with regard to accessibility, it’s far from perfect.

One of the chief concerns among athletic directors, according to Sports Illustrated’s Ross Dellenger, has to do with the home site first-round games. According to the suggested model, teams ranked from No. 5-12 will face off at the home stadium of the higher seed, while seeds one through four have a first-round bye and begin play in the quarterfinal round, which takes place at bowl sites. Naturally, there’s concern about the fact that these teams won’t get the revenue boost or advantage that comes from hosting a playoff game.

[exco_embed id=”e5869bc6-faf6-4b7a-8c06-b5610c96a8fe”]

According to Dellenger, this decision was made taking factors like weather into account, because, as one athletic director put it, “I don’t think playing in East Lansing, Michigan, on Jan. 7 is a good idea.”

While this is a bit of an oversight in the plan, it shouldn’t be a dealbreaker. However, more practical barriers remain in place, taking the form of a certain flower-themed bowl game in Pasadena.

The Rose Bowl has always been an obstacle to changing the format of the college football postseason given its historic nature. Its organizers don’t like to play the game outside of New Year’s Day afternoon, but assuming the Rose Bowl is part of the six-team site location, the game would have to be played on Jan. 2 if New Year’s Day is a Sunday. Further, it would have to be played a week later if it’s slotted to be a semifinal site.

Other smaller concerns exist, as well, such as the length of the season. A full slate could end up being 17 games, the same number as a full NFL regular season. Considering that college athletes are unpaid, this raises at least some ethical qualms, though their ability to profit off name, image and likeness will mitigate this issue.

Nothing said above would make expansion to 12 teams a nonstarter, but it does indicate that there are a lot of variables that still need to be addressed, and it’s understandable why the decision was made to delay its implementation for at least two years.

This new model would fundamentally change college football. It would give all 130 FBS teams a real shot to make the CFP for the first time ever, and the distinction between the Power Five and Group of Five (which feel like entirely separate subdivisions at times) would begin to diminish a bit. Will the potential for more access help address recruiting disparities in the sport? Or will the Alabamas and Ohio States of the world continue their dominance under the new format?

[lawrence-related id=44712,44678,44647,44640]

College Football Playoff Expansion Proposal To 12? What Would Have Happened?

A proposal to expand the College Football Playoff to 12 teams is on the table. What would’ve happened if this was the format from the start?

A proposal to expand the College Football Playoff to 12 teams is on the table. What would’ve happened if this was the format from the start?


Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

A proposal has been created by the College Football Playoff management committee to possible expand to 12 teams. It’ll be discussed next week with several tweaks, arguments, and counter-proposals sure to follow.

The plan would be to take the top six ranked conference champions to go along with the top six other teams according to the final college football rankings.

The top four teams – conference champions only – would get a bye, and the first round would be played on the home field of the higher seeded team. The quarterfinals would be held in bowl games – to be designated later – all leading to the four team format that’s in place now.

So what would a 12-team College Football Playoff have been in the old format?

From 2014 on, here’s how it would’ve played out.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01f1343a1wt7q817p7 player_id=none image=https://collegefootballnews.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

2015 | 2016 | 20172018 | 2019 | 2020

2014: With College Football Playoff Expansion 12-Team Plan

Final 2014 College Football Playoff Rankings Top 12
1. Alabama (SEC Champion)
2. Oregon (Pac-12 Champion)
3. Florida State (ACC Champion)
4. Ohio State (Big Ten Champion)
5. Baylor (Big Champion – through tie-breaker)
6. TCU
7. Mississippi State
8. Michigan State
9. Ole Miss
10. Arizona
11. Kansas State
12. Georgia Tech

Top 3 Left Out
12. Georgia Tech
13. Georgia
14. UCLA

[lawrence-related id=529413]

2014 College Football Playoff First Round Would’ve Been …
First Round Bye: 1. Alabama, 2. Oregon, 3. Florida State, 4. Ohio State

20. Boise State (Mountain West Champion) at 5. Baylor
11. Kansas State at 6. TCU
10. Arizona at 7. Mississippi State
9. Ole Miss at 8. Michigan State

2015 | 2016 | 20172018 | 2019 | 2020

NEXT: 2015 With College Football Playoff Expansion 12-Team Plan

Kirby Smart a fan of possible College Football Playoff expansion

Georgia football HC Kirby Smart talked about a potential expansion to the College Football Playoff.

The College Football Playoff currently allows four teams to play for a shot at winning it all, but it seems a majority of fans would like to see that number increase.

However, there may not be a group of people who would like to see an expansion more than head coaches themselves — Georgia’s Kirby Smart included.

While appearing on the Paul Finebaum Show on Wednesday, Smart spoke on that topic, saying it would be a ‘good thing’ to give more programs an opportunity.

“I think if you polled any coach it would be foolish to say you wouldn’t want playoff expansion,” Smart said. “The current system is working and being successful but to give more teams an opportunity is a good thing. You look in years past and how many times No. 4 beats No. 1 you could say the same thing could happen to six, eight or 10 teams.”

It makes perfect sense that Smart would like to see an expansion to the current system. He’s made it once, so he understands just how difficult it is to crack the top-four at season’s end. He’s also finished No. 5 twice, both in 2018 and 2019, so he certainly knows what it’s like to be on the outside looking in.

Kirby Smart gives his support of a massive CFP expansion

Georgia football head coach Kirby Smart gives his support of a College Football Playoff expansion, but not for just 8 teams.

The debate surrounding the College Football Playoff expansion has been growing, especially after such a bizarre college football season that 2020 gave us.

Many teams such as Texas A&M, who lost one game to Alabama, and Cincinnati, who went undefeated, believe they deserve a shot at a national title, but were snubbed.  Just to add fuel to that fire, the committee accepted an Ohio State team who played just six games and a Notre Dame team who got creamed by Clemson in the ACC Championship Game.

On top of this, such a large number of teams top players opt out when they find out their team didn’t make the final four.  Expanding the playoff would be a great incentive to keep those players around in hopes to compete for a national title.

The college football world has come a long way since the BCS days where the No. 1 and No. 2 teams would play for the title, but the buzz now is to expand it from four teams to eight.

Georgia head coach Kirby Smart wants even more.

Prior to Friday’s Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl matchup between No. 9 Georgia and No. 8 Cincinnati, Smart said he 100% in favor of expanding the playoffs, but wants twelve teams, not just eight.

The jump from four teams to twelve seems unlikely, but there has been a lot of frustration now being heard from teams who fall just short of that No. 4 spot.

Smart’s Bulldogs made the Playoff in the 2018 season and got the No. 5 spot the following two seasons, falling just short.  Those 2019 and 2020 Sugar Bowl games saw a massive increase in NFL caliber players opting out with the mindset of CFP Championship or bust.

There will be many conversations going down this offseason regarding the CFP expansion and only time will tell what the future of college football’s postseason holds.

Athletic Directors Support Expanding College Football Playoff

In a poll done by Stadium, the majority of Athletic Directors are in favor of expansion of the College Football Playoffs.

In a survey done by Stadium asking Athletic Directors over all levels of football, an overwhelming number of Athletic Directors from Power 5 conferences believe that the College Football Playoff’s should be expanded from 4 teams. Nothing will be able to change for the next 6 years, as the current playoff system will remain status quo until this contract expires after the 2026 season concludes.

Stadium found out that just 17% of the polled Athletic Directors would keep the CFP the way it is, with just 4 teams competing for a National Championship. The majority want to expand the playoff to 8 teams, which to me makes the most sense. Although an expanded CFP would create some issue with bowl affiliations to conferences, this version already has done that. For example, the Cotton Bowl was traditionally the runner up of the Big XII against an SEC team, but since the 2014 match-up of Missouri and Oklahoma State, the game hasn’t had the traditional foes.

If the CFP was to expand (in this hypothetical Stadium had expansion to 8 teams), the next question postured to AD’s was how to select the teams to be involved. At the current moment, the selection of teams are more objective instead of having set criteria for the selection committee to follow. Once again, the AD’s have an majority view on how the teams should be selected, each Power 5 champion would get an automatic bid, while two spots would go to at-large teams and the final spot to the highest ranked Group of 5 team.

The final question was where to hold the expanded playoff games, on the campus of the higher seed, a bowl game or neutral site? This poll was split fairly even, with a slight preference for the higher seed getting a game on campus. I love this idea, as southern teams almost never have to deal with weather elements. For instance, taking this model and applying it to last years rankings, Baylor would have had to travel to Columbus to face Ohio State in December.

I am all for the expansion of the College Football Playoff, 8 teams make the most sense to me, each Power 5 champion getting an automatic bid. I do feel like the criteria that was laid out for a G5 team isn’t up to par however. If they are ranked inside the top 10-12, I would be more comfortable including them into the group of 8 teams. Just having the highest ranked team just doesn’t make much sense to me, as last year an #17 Memphis would have qualified for the CFP to face #1 LSU. It seems like a blowout waiting to happen.

Just having the conversation now opens up the idea for CFP expansion in the future. How would you change the CFP format when the current systems contract expires?