College Football News Preview 2020: Rutgers Scarlet Knights

College Football News Preview 2020: Previewing, predicting, looking ahead to the Rutgers Scarlet Knights season with what you need to know.

College Football News Preview 2020: Previewing, predicting, and looking ahead to the Rutgers Scarlet Knights season with what you need to know.


Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

– What You Need To Know: Offense | Defense
Top Players | Key Players, Games, Stats
What Will Happen, Win Total Prediction
Schedule Analysis
– Rutgers Previews 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015

2019 Record: 2-10 overall, 0-9 in Big Ten
Head Coach: Greg Schiano, 1st year, 12th year at Rutgers overall, 68-67
2019 CFN Final Opinion Ranking: 103
2019 CFN Final Season Formula Ranking: 123
2019 CFN Preview Ranking: 75

No one knows what’s going to happen to the 2020 college football season. We’ll take a general look at where each team stands – doing it without spring ball to go by – while crossing our fingers that we’ll all have some well-deserved fun this fall. Hoping you and yours are safe and healthy.

5. College Football News Preview 2020: Rutgers Scarlet Knights Offense 3 Things To Know

The offense that finished second-to-last in the nation in both total yards and scoring, Rutgers needs to find a positive identity under new offensive coordinator Sean Gleeson. He comes in from Oklahoma State, and he’s all but starting from scratch.

The team only scored 159 points, and 92 came in two games. You were promised there wouldn’t be any math here, but that means the O scored just 67 points over the other ten games, averaging fewer than seven points per outing.

The program has come up with ten points or fewer in 11 of its last 15 games and scored more than 21 just six times in the last 33 games – that’s not very good. But there’s a positive – at least the O returns a ton of experience.


CFN in 60 Video: Rutgers Scarlet Knights Preview
[jwplayer zj569YJa]


And the starting quarterback is … Artur Sitkowski? He was in the transfer portal, and then he wasn’t. He only threw for 429 yards and a touchdown with two picks, and then it was up to then-freshman Johnny Langan to step and and take his cuts.

Langan ran around a bit – with 391 yards and three scores – but he only threw for 840 yards and four scores with nine picks. On the way is Nebraska grad transfer Noah Vedral to throw his dual-threat hat into the ring.

A slew of targets bolted, but almost all of the top receivers from last year are back, and Wisconsin transfer and return star Aron Cruickshank will add some flash.

Bo Melton is back after leading the way with 30 catches for 427 yards and two scores, and Isaiah Washington is a big 6-3 sophomore who was second among the wideouts with 18 grabs. Also in the equation is former star quarterback prospect Johnathan Lewis, who’ll likely work at tight end.

The offensive line is going to take a while. It was a a problem last year – Rutgers was dead last in rushing offense – and it loses two starters to graduation, C Michael Maietti to Missouri, and a few other reserves to the transfer portal. The recruiting class addressed the line a wee bit, but this part of the puzzle will take the longest to put together.

Losing flashy RB Raheem Blackshear to Virginia Tech stinks, but junior Isaiah Pacheco isn’t a bad back when he gets room to move, and sophomore Aaron Young is a speedster with a little experienced.

NEXT: College Football News Preview 2020: Rutgers Scarlet Knights Defense 3 Things To Know

Big Ten, big ’20s: Rutgers football

Rutgers football in the 2020s

For Rutgers perspective entering the new decade of Big Ten football, I turned to Dustin Schutte of Saturday Tradition. You can find Dustin’s Big Ten writings at Saturday Tradition and elsewhere on the web.

Here is what Dustin Schutte had to say about the big questions and challenges facing Rutgers football in the 2020s:

“The biggest question for Rutgers doesn’t necessarily come on the field, it’s about whether or not the university and its boosters are willing to make the investment required to compete in the Big Ten. Bringing Greg Schiano back was a nice start, but it’s just the first step in Rutgers’ climb of Kukulkan.

The last four years have been so atrocious that it’s easy to understand why donors may be hesitant to gift their money to a program that has been the laughingstock of the Big Ten. Schiano has an incredibly small window to start proving that Rutgers can be competitive in the toughest division in college football. If not, the money may start shriveling up again, and the Rutgers would likely have to reconsider its status as a Big Ten institution.”

The fact that Rutgers went back to a previous coach is not all that surprising, nor is it as unique as it once was. Bobby Petrino had a second act at Louisville. Heck, remember Johnny Majors winning a national championship at Pittsburgh in 1976 and then coming back to Pitt in the 1990s after he was muscled out of power at Tennessee by Philip Fulmer? It’s not unheard of for a coach to come back to a program. Given Schiano’s success at Rutgers, why wouldn’t the program want a second chance to say, in New Jersey, “SING US A SONG, YOU’RE THE SCHIANO MAN! SING US A SONG TONIGHT! FOR WE’RE ALL IN THE MOOD FOR A BOWL GAME, AND YOU’LL MAKE US FEEL ALL RIGHT!”

The real problem with a second Schiano tenure at Rutgers is that Schiano — for all his successes — wanted a lot of power over Rutgers, more than the university’s finances could withstand. He intimidated administrators and was part of a culture of secrecy in Piscataway at New Jersey’s state school. The football program itself might be fine, but will the administration of Rutgers Athletics and RU’s budgets be more responsible and transparent this time? That in many ways is the biggest concern I have.

Dustin’s observations above are very much on point and deserve thoughtful consideration.