The one stat on defense that will define Wisconsin’s 2020 season

Last month I laid out the one stat on offense that will define the Badgers’ 2020 season. Today, we’re looking at the defensive side of…

Last month I laid out the one stat on offense that will define the Badgers’ 2020 season. Today, we’re looking at the defensive side of the football and finding the one area that will dictate whether Jim Leonhard’s defense is able to repeat their impressive 2019 campaign.

Badger fans know well that the 2018 season was a disappointing one on the defensive side of the football. A combination of youth in the secondary and injuries to key contributors handcuffed a unit that ended up finishing the season with more than 150 rushing yards-per-game allowed and almost 350 total yards-per-game allowed.

The 2019 unit, then, bested the squad from the year before in nearly every category, finishing the year only allowing 101 rush yards-per-game, a 51.7 completion percentage, 187 pass yards-per-game and 288 total yards-per-game.

What was the biggest difference between the two teams, aside from many of the key contributors returning for the 2019 season?

Two things that in the big picture are directly related to each other.

No. 1: a full 1.1-yard difference in their opponents’ rush yards-per-attempt.

No. 2: a more-than 10 percent difference in the rate at which their opponents converted their third down chances.

Like Wisconsin’s offensive attack, Leonhard’s defense prides itself on being tough against the run and controlling the opponents’ ground game.

In 2018, for various reasons, the defense got ran over and, as a result, saw the entire field open up for opposing teams to use run fakes and get young corners to make mistakes on the outside.

Specifically, that year Leonhard’s defense gave up 4.4 yards-per-attempt on the ground and, as mentioned earlier, 155 rush yards-per-game.

Those tallies are both the highest any Badger defense has allowed since the 2005 squad gave up 4.5 yards-per-rush and 165.8 yards-per-game on the ground. For reference, since 2005 the Badger defense have allowed more than 140 rush yards-per-game one time other than 2018 and more than 130 just three times.

Comparing it now to 2019, the team gave up just 3.3 yards-per-attempt and 99.8 yards-per-game on the ground, both impressive numbers by anybody’s standards and a massive improvement from the previous year.

This improvement played a large role in the 6.5-point difference in opponents scoring-per-game and, therefore, the difference between a 10-4 record (with two losses coming against Ohio State, one of the best teams statistically in the last 15 years) and an 8-5 record.

If that was too many numbers and not enough about what it meant to the unit specifically, the insane rushing numbers the Badgers gave up in 2018 handcuffed the young secondary, kept the opposing offense on the field, allowed opponents to control the game like the Badgers so often do with their rushing attack and, finally, allowed teams to have success in stat No. 2 that will be so important to the 2020 season: third down conversion percentage.

The two stats are correlated because when an opposing team is able to run the ball in early-down situations and set up third-and-short chances, their conversion rate will understandably be a lot higher.

And what has been made clear for years now, specially in the Badgers’ case, winning the time of possession battle and controlling the game with the ball in your offense’s hands is how you win football games.

The first step in this is getting the defense off the field by stopping the opponent on third down.

I mentioned the difference above but, specifically, the 2018 defense gave up a 37.43 percent conversion rate on third down. The 2019 team? 27.27 percent.

This ten percent increase equated to the total of 19 extra conversions by the opponent, or 19 more chances for teams to score and keep Jonathan Taylor and the Badger offense off of the field.

Does stopping the opponent on third down start with stopping the run on first and second down? Absolutely. But a ten percent difference is significant no matter how long the conversions are.

Looking forward to 2020 now, Leonhard will need to try to recreate the production of now-NFL linebackers Chris Orr and Zack Baun and find ways to stop opposing offenses without those two players leading the defense.

Will it be an easy task to find 24 sacks, 33.5 tackles-for-loss and 153 total tackles? No, it won’t. But on the bright side the unit now has future-NFL linebacker Jack Sanborn quarterbacking the defense, a great run-stopping safety tandem in Eric Burrell and Reggie Pearson and an up-and-coming defensive tackle Keeanu Benton who showed flashes of absolute dominance last season as only a true freshman.

The phrase “ball control” sounds at times like a secret Big Ten saying that really just means play old-school football and shame the Big 12 and PAC 12 for not playing a lick of defense.

It really matters though and, as pointed out above, was one of the biggest differences between a struggling 2018 defense and an absolutely dominant 2019 one (again taking into account that their worst performances came against Ohio State, one of the best offenses statistically in college football history).

Only time will tell but if the 2020 squad is able to recreate the production from last season and give quarterback Jack Coan more chances to put points on the board, we could be in for a special season in Madison,

Projecting Wisconsin’s 2020 Spring Defensive Depth Chart

Who will open up on Wisconsin’s spring depth chart on the defensive side of the football?

Wisconsin’s defense in 2020 will be missing not only two key players but also two key leaders to not only the defense but the entire team. Those two players being 2019 team captains outside linebacker Zack Baun and inside linebacker Chris Orr. Despite Wisconsin losing Baun and Orr to graduation the Badgers still return an impressive nine starters from last year’s defense.

In this Badgers Wire feature, we project what the spring depth chart on defense will look like when the Badgers open up spring practice.

Projected Spring Depth Chart Defensive Line: DE 1. Isaiahh Loudermilk and Garrett Rand, 2. Matt Henningsen and Isaiah Mullens NT 1. Keeanu Benton 2. Gio Paez

Loudermilk and Rand were able to stay healthy over the course of their redshirt junior seasons and as long as they stay healthy they have established themselves as starters at the defensive end positions. Henningsen used last year’s spring practice to put him in a position to have a terrific redshirt sophomore season. If Henningsen can put together a productive spring like he did in 2019 should allow him to take another step in his development. Mullens appeared in 13 games mostly on special teams as he registered one tackle. With backup defensive end David Pfaff graduating he’ll have a chance in spring football to show why he deserves to be apart of the defensive line rotation. At nose tackle, Keeanu Benton will be going through his first spring practice and will receive plenty of valuable practice reps as Bryson Williams could miss all of spring football as he continues to recover from his left leg injury that he suffered this past season. If Williams can’t go that will mean more reps for redshirt freshman Gio Paez as it will be critical that he takes advantage of his reps.

Projected Spring Depth Chart Linebackers: OLB 1. Noah Burks and Izayah Green-May, 2. Spencer Lytle and Jaylan Franklin ILB 1. Jack Sanborn and Leo Chenal 2. Mike Maskalunas and Maema Njongmeta

Christian Bell would’ve had a chance at competing for one of the starting outside linebacker positions opposite of Noah Burks but instead elected to transfer. That leave’s Green-May as the likely starter opposite of Burks when Wisconsin opens spring football. Green-May initially started the 2019 season as a starter but suffered a right arm injury early in the season, which caused him to miss time. Green-May was able to put together a productive fall camp and the practice habits he developed last year will need to continue if he wants to establish himself as the starter once again. Outside linebackers coach Bobby April will also give Franklin and Lytle a look as a starter opposite of Burks. Making it an important spring for both of them as the Badgers look for a starter who can complement Burks. Wisconsin may lose Chris Orr at middle linebacker but the transition between Orr and Leo Chenal should be a smooth one. Chenal gained valuable experience last year as he played as a true freshman. Chenal will receive plenty of reps over spring football and he should be able to take a nice step in his development. Maskalunas will be Chenal’s top competitor for the other starting inside linebacker position as he’s been serviceable during his time at Wisconsin. Njongmeta redshirted last season and will be going through his first spring practice.

Projected Spring Depth Chart Cornerbacks: 1. Faion Hicks and Rachad Wildgoose 2. Caesar Williams and Semar Melvin

Hicks has been a regular starter at cornerback for Wisconsin the past two seasons and that shouldn’t change heading into spring practices. Wildgoose and Williams started eight and seven games respectively a season ago. The trio has been Wisconsin’s most consistent group of cornerbacks. Semar Melvin is coming off a redshirt season but he was able to take advantage of the redshirt rule by playing in four games without burning a year of eligibility. Melvin was up and down, which is understandable but the reps he does receive during spring practice will be invaluable as he looks to build off of his freshman season. Jim Leonhard will also likely rotate in Donte Burton and Deron Harrell too as the starters at cornerback or with the second string cornerbacks too.

Projected Spring Depth Chart Safety: FS 1. Eric Burrell, 2. John Torchio SS 1. Reggie Pearson, 2. Collin Wilder

Wisconsin Football Season Review: Safeties

Evaluating the play of Wisconsin’s safeties during the 2019 season.

Wisconsin finished its fifth season under head coach Paul Chryst as Chryst improved his overall record to 52-16 and has a posted a 34-10 record in conference games. After not winning the Big Ten West Division title in 2018 the Badgers were back in Indianapolis for the Big Ten Championship game as the West representative for the fourth time in the last six years since the Big Ten went to its current format.

In this Badgers Wire feature we will examine the play of Wisconsin’s safeties from the 2019 season and take a sneak into what the 2020 season may have in store for the position:

Wisconsin was only set to lose D’Cota Dixon to graduation following the 2018 season at the safety position as it was expected the starters for this past season would be redshirt sophomore Scott Nelson at free safety and redshirt freshman Reggie Pearson at strong safety.

Nelson who missed time as a redshirt freshman only played in one game this past year as he lost for the season with a left leg injury following Wisconsin’s game against South Florida.

Luckily for Wisconsin they had the depth to absorb the loss of Nelson as Eric Burrell stepped in seamlessly at the free safety position.

Between the combination of Burrell and Pearson, the duo formed a formidable safety combination in the Big Ten. As the two did well of making sure they didn’t allow a lot of chunk plays through the air.

Pearson led the two in tackles with 60 but Burrell wasn’t far behind with 55. If there was one area where Burrell succeeded from the safety position it was making a play on the ball as he picked off three passes, registered six pass breakups, forced two fumbles, and recovered two as well.

Burrell also was able to make his way into the backfield as he registered 3.5 tackles for loss and two sacks. Pearson who is one of the bigger hitters on the defensive side of the football also made his presence in the backfield finishing the year with 3.5 tackles for loss and forced two fumbles.

Burrell was a consensus All-Big Ten Honorable mention selection due to his productivity throughout the season.

Although Pearson and Burrell were able to help make plays for Wisconsin from the safety position the Badgers also had a reliable third safety in Collin Wilder.

Wilder who had to sit out the 2018 season due to him transferring in from Houston was steady in his play. Wilder finished the season with 19 tackles but when the football was thrown in his direction it appeared that he was ready to try and make a play on the football as he registered an interception and broke up six passes.

Madison Cone split his defensive reps between the nickel cornerback position and also at safety. Cone did miss time this year because of injury, which affected his impact on the team as he finished the season with seven tackles in 10 games.

2020 Wisconsin Safeties

The way Burrell played throughout the course of the season will likely allow him to continue to be the starter at free safety. But having your backups at the safety positions be Nelson and Wilder the Badgers, if they want, should be able to interchange their safeties and be comfortable that there won’t be a drop off. In addition, the Badgers have done well in recruiting the position. Although the competition at safety will be high the Badgers will need to continue to develop players like Cone, John Torchio, and Titus Toler. Torchio finished the season in the two deep as he was Burrell’s backup at free safety. Torchio a walk-on saw most of his time when the game was decided but did start the game against Northwestern as Burrell had to miss the first half due to a targeting call. Torchio finished the season with three tackles, two pass breakups, and one interception. Torchio will be a name to keep your eye on as a potential contributor down the road.

Grading Wisconsin’s 34-21 Loss to Ohio State in the Big Ten Championship Game

What grades did Wisconsin earn in their 34-21 loss to Ohio State in the Big Ten Championship Game?

Grading No. 8 Wisconsin’s 34-21 loss over No. 1 Ohio State.

Offense: C

Wisconsin couldn’t put together two strong halves of football on offense. After registering 294 yards of total offense in the first half against Ohio State’s defense the Buckeyes held the Badgers to 138 yards on 37 offensive plays.

Wisconsin in the first half was able to create a balance as the Badgers rushed for 194 yards and Jack Coan threw for 100 yards. Coan was able to make the plays he needed to in the first half to give the Badgers a chance of pulling the upset leading 21-7 at halftime.

But the same opportunities that were there for Coan in the first half the Buckeyes had an answer for in the second half. Coan was able to consistently connect on quick passes to his wide receivers but with the Buckeyes dropping into zone coverage in the second half the same passing lanes simply weren’t open.

Coan’s go-to target in the passing game was Quintez Cephus who finished the game with seven receptions for 122 yards.

Cephus’ two biggest catches of the game came on the first offensive play, which resulted in a 27-yard gain helping set up Wisconsin’s first touchdown of the game. Cephus also hauled in a 24-yard catch to set up Wisconsin 1st and goal from the 1-yard line. Coan was able to punch the football in on the ensuing offensive play to give Wisconsin a 21-7 lead right before halftime.

Coan finished the game with 232 yards passing on 17-for-33 passing, in addition, he rushed for 27 yards on eight carries and he had two rushing touchdowns. Coan was able to use his mobility to his advantage in the first half as he was able to keep plays alive with his feet and to extend drives.

Jonathan Taylor became the first player this season to rush for over 100 yards as he finished the game with 148 yards on 20 carries and had a 44-yard rushing touchdown. Taylor also registered a 45-yard rush on Wisconsin’s final offensive drive in the first half. If Taylor is stopped for minimal gain the Badgers likely go into halftime up 14-to-7.

But Taylor’s run continued to allow for Wisconsin to play with the same aggression that they played with throughout the first half.

Wisconsin had six different players catch a pass as outside of Cephus having a productive day Danny Davis who hasn’t caught a pass in three straight games was second on the team in both receptions (three) and receiving yards (38).

The Badgers offensive line turned in a better performance in the rematch against Ohio State but in the second half, the Buckeyes started to get the better of Wisconsin’s offensive line. Considering the Buckeyes defense held Wisconsin to 3.7 yards per play.

The Badgers offensive line also allowed eight tackles for loss and two sacks as Chase Young finished the game with six tackles, 1.5 tackles for loss, two pass breakups, and two quarterback hurries.

Who earned game balls from Wisconsin’s 37-21 victory against Nebraska?

Handing out game balls from Wisconsin’s 37-21 victory over Nebraska. Jonathan Taylor RB, Reggie Pearson S, Zack Baun OLB

[jwplayer WRqZP19r-er0jUifI]

LINCOLN, Neb. – There were many contributors to Wisconsin’s 37-21 win over Nebraska on Saturday, but these were the three key players to the Badgers’ victory over the Cornhuskers.

Jonathan Taylor

Taylor’s success against Nebraska continued on Saturday as for the third time in his career he rushed for over 200 yards as he finished the game with 204 yards and two touchdowns on 25 carries. In his career, Taylor rushed for 674 yards on 74 carries and seven touchdowns. Taylor didn’t bust a long rush against Nebraska as his longest gain was 19 yards but he still averaged an impressive 8.2 yards per carry. Taylor’s first touchdown of the day in the second quarter put Wisconsin up 24-14 allowing the Badgers to play with a double-digit lead for the rest of the game.

Reggie Pearson

Pearson had to exit the game briefly with a right arm injury but he was able to return to the game. With Nebraska threatening to cut Wisconsin’s lead to 37-27 in the fourth quarter Pearson was able to make the critical defensive play of the game when he stopped Wyatt Mazour at Wisconsin’s 1-yard line on a fourth and goal play. Pearson finished the game with a team leading 10 tackles.

Zack Baun

Adrian Martinez was able to get out of the pocket and pick up positive yards at times with his feet as he finished the game with 89 yards rushing on 16 carries and one touchdown. But Baun did register two sacks his second multi-sack game this season and third in his career. Baun’s second sack of the day was big as it resulted in a 20-yard loss. Martinez on Nebraska’s opening offensive possession in the second half was able to get the Cornhuskers to Wisconsin’s 24-yard line. On first and 10 with Martinez dropping back to pass Baun’s sack set up 2nd and 30 at Wisconsin’s 44-yard line. Although Martinez was able to get the 20-yards back on Nebraska’s next two plays it forced the Cornhuskers to settle for a field goal from 41-yards, which they missed. That missed field goal by Nebraska allowed for Wisconsin to go on a 9-play, 76-yard touchdown drive as Taylor capped it off with an 11-yard touchdown run.