MLBPA’s Tony Clark admitted that the union is frustrated over the new Fanatics-produced Nike uniforms

Players HATE the new MLB uniforms.

Despite MLB’s best efforts to promote the new Nike Vapor Premier uniforms, the overwhelming reaction from players has been negative. The MLBPA is also echoing that sentiment.

After hearing complaints over the cheap look and lack of customizable fits, the MLBPA is taking action in hopes of working out the issues with Nike and Fanatics. As part of the 10-year uniform deal MLB struck in 2020, Nike designs the uniforms for Fanatics — a sports apparel giant with a shoddy reputation — to produce.

Speaking to The Athletic this week, union executive director Tony Clark admitted that they are frustrated with the uniforms. He said:

“Any time there’s change, there’s an adjustment period. Sometimes that adjustment period goes well, sometimes not so much. In this instance, there appear to be some misses that could have otherwise not been misses.”

He continued:

“We are on the phone with the requisite parties that are involved in making that decision because we aren’t. We’re trying to make sure our guys have what they need in the fashion that they need it. And it’s reflective of what being a major-league ballplayer should be reflective of.”

While it’s almost certainly too late to make any changes to the retail versions of the jerseys, there is hope that something can be done to improve the on-field jerseys in time for Opening Day. Specifically, players aren’t pleased with the smaller (and more curved) name plate, lack of stitching and overall feel for the uniforms. They’d also want to be able to tailor the pants to their liking as they used to be able to.

We’ll have to see if something can get done in time, but the looks across spring training have not been great.

MLB player complaints over Fanatics jerseys at spring training has the union quickly stepping in

MLB players are calling their union over their Fanatics experience

Pitchers and catchers arrived at spring training this week ready to return to the grind of Major League Baseball only to find their lockers filled with jerseys that most Little Leaguers would scoff at.

It seems that even though Nike signed a 10-year jersey deal with MLB, the company has licensed production of the threads out to Fanatics, a manufacturer with notorious quality issues.

Players are now learning in real time about what fans have long experienced it comes to Fanatics products. According to The Athletic’s Stephen J. Nesbitt, the players union is already stepping in:

An airing of sartorial grievances that began earlier this week at the St. Louis Cardinals complex in Jupiter, Fla. has resulted in Nike, which engineered and designed the jerseys, and Fanatics, which manufactured them, facing blowback from big leaguers and baseball fans alike. The complaints prompted players to take their displeasure to their union, and the MLBPA is now involved in relaying the players’ concerns.

Both Nike and Fanatics declined to provide a comment to The Athletic. Fanatics is slated to begin manufacturing jerseys for NHL players next year as well.

It’s unclear what recourse the players have, but elevating the complaints from simple quips in the media to a union issue shows how much contempt there is in the clubhouses.

And the discourse is likely to grow louder. So far most camps have only required pitchers and catchers to report. Position players begin arriving in Florida and Arizona next week. We’ll see what they have to say about their new jerseys once they get a chance to try them on.

MLB players couldn’t wait to change their avatars back after the lockout ended

Say goodbye to generic blank avatars, baseball is back!

By now you may have figured out that MLB and the Players Association were able to reach a new collective bargaining agreement on Thursday.

In fact, there was a very simple way to tell the madness had ended after 99 days of an owner-imposed lockout: MLB players began restoring their avatars on social media.

If this seems like a strange harbinger for the return of the sport, let us explain:

When the owners officially locked out the MLBPA, the league and its teams could no longer use photos or likeness of players in the union. Instead, all MLB roster pages featured empty silhouettes where players faces would normally be. That quickly became a rallying cry on social media as players, fans and supporters of the MLBPA removed their avatars in solidarity.

Once the lockout was lifted on Thursday, the players couldn’t wait to change their avatars back:

Here’s hoping we don’t have to see these faces go away again anytime soon.

[listicle id=1858251]

[listicle id=1858230]

 

 

 

Rob Manfred’s latest tactic to justify the MLB lockout is his most laughable

Will the investment bank that analyzed MLB team values please stand up?

Since taking over the office of the commissioner of Major League Baseball, Rob Manfred, an allegedly smart person with degrees from Harvard and Cornell, has made a penchant of saying some incredibly stupid things.

There was the time he called the World Series trophy a “piece of metal” following the largest cheating scandal the sport has seen in a century—a scandal he refused to punish any players for partaking in, no less.

That was quickly followed by Manfred attempting to use the COVID-19 shutdown to strong-arm players into an absurd reworking of baseball’s economic structure, resulting in him unilaterally imposing a 60-game shortened season after failing to reach a deal.

Most recently, Manfred initiated a lockout of the MLBPA as a negotiating tactic that he claimed would only help speed up the completion of a new collective bargaining agreement—then he waited 43 days before even getting back to the table.

But his comments on Thursday may be an all-time low—or high, depending on your view—of Manfred’s tenure.

Speaking to reporters in an attempt to bolster MLB owners’ cries of economic hardship, Manfred claimed the league hired an investment banker who showed that running a Major League Baseball team just isn’t profitable.

“We actually hired an investment banker, a really good one, actually, to look at that very issue,” Manfred said. “If you look at a purchase price of franchises, the cash that’s put in during the period of ownership, and then what they sold for, historically, the return on those investments is below what you get in the stock market, which looks like the end of the stock market was a lot more risky.”

You’d think a massive study showing a critical public misunderstanding of baseball’s core economic structure is something MLB owners would want to spread far and wide. If this were actually the case, Manfred would be doing a disservice to the owners he works for by keeping it in his back pocket. A fireable offense if there ever was one.

Except Manfred and MLB won’t say anything else about the study. Not what framework was used to determine team values, not what data the analysts had access to and certainly not which bank was responsible for compiling the report.

Per The Athletic’s Evan Drellich (emphasis by FTW):

A Major League Baseball spokesperson declined to identify the investment bank that produced the study, or other details about the study. The answer Manfred gave was indirect, in that it answered a question of how teams fared relative to the stock market, when the question posed had nothing to do with the stock market but was simply: Are teams good investments? And an attempt to temper the quality of investment in baseball team runs counter to public studies and reporting.

“Pitchbook said that since 2002, all four of the major U.S. sports leagues have performed better than the S&P 500 companies on the stock market. The return on MLB franchises was 669 percent, above the NFL’s 558 percent and exceeded only by the NBA’s 1,057 percent.”

This is, objectively, quite sketchy! And, objectively, quite easy to debunk.

Forbes senior contributor Maury Brown dug into Manfred’s comments even further, and the more you pick them apart the less sense they seem to make:

“The comments would make the likes of Steven Cohen – one of the biggest hedge fund moguls in the world – look like a poor investor. If Manfred is saying he could have invested his money more wisely, and with less risk, why would he do so? There are other investment factors beyond just the purchase and sale. In 2019, just before the pandemic struck, the annual Forbes valuations of the 30 clubs noted how incredibly lucrative owning an MLB franchise is.”

You don’t even have to be an investment banker to see that the price of MLB teams has gone up exponentially over the years.

Before Cohen bought the Mets for $2.48 billion, the Kansas City Royals—one of the smaller market teams in the league—sold for $1 billion only 20 years after previous owner David Glass purchased his controlling stake for $96 million.

Jeffrey Loria bought the Miami Marlins in 2002 for $158.5 million and sold them for $1.2 billion in 2017. The club’s Opening Day payroll during Loria’s stewardship exceed $60 million on just five occasions.

As far as the idea investing in the stock market would’ve been a better choice for the league’s billionaires, well, ESPN’s Jeff Passan took a Mjolnir-like hammer to that notion:

“Never mind the fact that 30 men chose to own baseball teams rather than investing that money in the stock market. It’s better to focus on the hard facts that are publicly available and show that owning at least one team, the Atlanta Braves, is quite an excellent investment.

“The Braves are owned by Liberty Media, a publicly traded company, and their financials are laid bare in public statements. The most recent statement covers the third quarter of 2021, from July through September, before the Braves won the World Series. In that quarter alone, the team’s operating income before depreciation and amortization (OIBDA) was $55 million, according to Liberty. Hefty returns aren’t anything new. The team’s OIBDA in 2018 was $88 million and in 2019 $49 million before losing $53 million during the COVID-shortened 2020 season. And that’s leaving out entirely the tax benefits organizations reap through depreciation and amortization.”

So we’re left with this: Either Rob Manfred is lying through his teeth in a weak attempt to make players look responsible for the league’s owners deciding to lock out the MLBPA, or Major League Baseball hired the worst investment banker alive to analyze financial data the league typically goes to great lengths to hide.

If it’s the latter, we would absolutely love to hear from you and are genuinely curious how you came to such a conclusion.

Until then, it’s impossible to do anything but laugh at Manfred using labor scare tactics any high schooler could refute with a quick Google search.

[mm-video type=video id=01fvmsgd0kb9rcmpygyt playlist_id=none player_id=none image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01fvmsgd0kb9rcmpygyt/01fvmsgd0kb9rcmpygyt-38e6c66d2c087c4f825a2b816a087940.jpg]

[listicle id=1843696]

MLB and MLBPA are heading towards an ugly showdown in 2021 after latest rejection vote

It’s going to get worse.

MLB’s shutdown amid the coronavirus pandemic has led to months of contentious negotiating between the owners and the MLBPA. Between the numerous proposals (and counter proposals), attempts from both sides to control narratives through social media and haggling over games played, the negotiations have seemingly had everything except, well, progress.

And while Monday appeared to provide a turning point, MLB fans — who have agonized over these labor disputes — should get ready for an uglier scene in the future.

The MLBPA formally rejected MLB’s 60-game restart proposal on Monday, which set up commissioner Rob Manfred to unilaterally implement a season between 50 and 60 games. But don’t get too excited about baseball’s probable return because a Manfred-implemented season is just a temporary reprieve from a labor dispute that will almost certainly alienate more fans and hurt the sport’s future.

ESPN’s Buster Olney laid out what’s ahead for the MLB-MLBPA relationship.

Had the MLBPA accepted the owners’ proposal, the union would have forfeited the ability to file a grievance against the league. Fair or not, that’s leverage the MLBPA shouldn’t give up.

The MLBPA contends that owners have negotiated in bad faith all in an effort to save money and play the least amount of games. And the owners — who definitely *did* want to minimize the games played, or cancel the season completely — would have preferred to avoid a costly grievance that would only lead to a more heated negotiating period ahead of the CBA’s expiration on Dec. 31, 2021.

But that’s exactly where MLB and the MLBPA are heading. As unbearable as it was to hear both sides argue about money and games during a global pandemic, the game’s future looks that much worse. It’ll be more lawyers, more strongly worded statements … and less baseball.

And, sadly, that’s the last thing baseball can afford right now.

[jwplayer JDU9W043-q2aasYxh]

One wild 30-minute Twitter spree had MLB fans very confused about a possible return

We were so close.

While the NBA is basically set to restart its season in Orlando, Major League Baseball and the MLBPA remain in a frustrating financial stalemate that has the season in doubt.

But, briefly, there was hope on Wednesday. And I mean briefly.

Following reports that MLB commissioner Rob Manfred held a face-to-face meeting with MLBPA head Tony Clark in Arizona, MLB Network’s Jon Heyman tweeted that the two sides were finally closing in on an agreement to start the season. According to Heyman, the owners agreed to to the players’ demands for a full prorated salary — though the number of games were unclear. There would also be an expanded postseason.

It seemed like great news.

But shortly after Heyman posted his report, other members of the baseball media shared updates that conflicted with the immediate optimism of Heyman’s report. Basically, the MLBPA had just received a proposal. The two sides were not close to a deal.

MLB players were also confused by Heyman’s reporting as several tweeted that they hadn’t seen any proposal from the owners.

Yet, Heyman’s report did more than enough to get the hopes up of baseball fans across the internet.

The reporting from Jeff Passan and others, though, eventually led to the MLBPA putting out a statement to confirm that no agreement had been reached.

Despite the statement, Heyman still claimed that a deal was at hand.

According to Ken Rosenthal, the league’s proposal will look awfully like what Red pitcher Trevor Bauer expected: a 60-game season.

It remains to be seen if the MLBPA will agree with those terms. So, despite that wild 30 minutes on Twitter, baseball isn’t back yet.

[jwplayer byC91n0u-q2aasYxh]