Golfweek’s Best 2022: Top public and private courses in Tennessee

The Volunteer State proves that nine holes can be enough with Sweetens Cove and the Course at Sewanee.

Golfweek’s Best is willing to buck tradition when it comes to the top public-access layouts in Tennessee, as two of the three highest ranked layouts are just nine holes.

Sweetens Cove, which has built a loyal following online and on its untraditional tee sheet, comes in at No. 1. Located about halfway between Nashville and Atlanta in tiny South Pittsburg, the design by the firm of King-Collins offers fresh twists on classic architectural features across its nine holes. It has created massive interest in a flat floodplain between mountains, proving that golfers are more than willing to travel to find a good time.

Likewise, the Gil Hanse-redesigned Course at Sewanee is a can’t miss in Tennessee despite being just nine holes. Perched atop a mountain at the University of the South, several holes feature long views over a valley while various tees allow the nine holes to play entirely differently on subsequent loops. Sewanee comes in at No. 3 on Golfweek’s Best 2022 public-access list for Tennessee.

Golfweek’s Best offers many lists of course rankings, with that of top public-access courses in each state among the most popular. All the courses on this list allow public access in some fashion, be it standard daily green fees, through a resort or by staying at an affiliated hotel. If there’s a will, there’s a tee time.

Also popular are the Golfweek’s Best rankings of top private courses in each state, and that list for Tennessee’s private offerings is likewise included below.

MORE: Best Modern | Best Classic | Top 200 Resort | Top 200 Residential | Top 100 Best You Can Play

(m): Modern course, built in or after 1960
(c): Classic course, built before 1960

Note: If there is a number in the parenthesis with the m or c, that indicates where that course ranks among Golfweek’s Best top 200 modern or classic courses. 

‘Put the pedal down and go for it’: King-Collins’ Landmand Golf Club opens in Nebraska

Rob Collins and design partner Tad King break the glass ceiling with Landmand Golf Club in Nebraska.

Big and bold – good words to live by. Interesting, different, unlikely. All attributes ascribed to artists, authors, chefs, actors … really anyone who can grab attention and hold it. 

Even golf course architects. 

Rob Collins initially grabbed attention for his big and bold design at Sweetens Cove Golf Club which opened in 2015 in remote Tennessee. A nine-holer built on a flat floodplain amidst the Appalachian Mountains, Sweetens Cove had to grab attention and hold it – a run-of-the-mill design atop the previous course named Sequatchie Valley on the same damp site might have drawn flies, but not many golfers.

Instead, Collins and his design partner, Tad King, moved some 300,000 cubic yards of dirt to erect what has become Tennessee’s No. 1-ranked public-access course in Golfweek’s Best ratings. Big greens, bold slopes – there are those words again, and at Sweetens Cove, those concepts have drawn a loyal following of golfers who will drive to the middle of nowhere to experience something different and entirely interesting. 

“I always did believe there was some form of greatness to be achieved out there, and that it could be very popular,” Collins said of Sweetens Cove, the first course built by his and King’s then-new golf architecture firm, King-Collins. “It was so different and so unique and so much fun, the early adopters of the place gave us so much enthusiasm and belief in what we had done. It was like a religious experience for a lot of people.”

Now comes the next step in big and bold for King-Collins, on a completely different landscape and scale – and after waiting longer than either could have imagined after Sweetens Cove’s ascent into the top 100 modern golf courses in the U.S.

The public-access Landmand Golf Club in eastern Nebraska, King-Collins’ first original 18-hole layout, opens for regular play September 3 on what Collins describes as simply crazy terrain for golf. Built atop and around bluffs and dunes near the village of Homer in the Loess Hills – geologic terrain left in the wake of retreating glaciers during the last Ice Age – Landmand presented unique challenges and opportunities in a wide-open and extreme landscape with views for miles. Collins said he and King went all-out in trying to take advantage of everything the site, including its 150 feet of elevation changes, offered. 

“You had to just put the pedal down and go for it,” Collins said of his approach to Landmand. “The first time you see it, the scale is just going to blow your mind. Every time I go out there, I laugh about it. Things that are gigantic in reality just shrink in this landscape.”

On such a vast playing field – and because of the region’s frequent gusty winds – Collins said his team was inspired to install massive fairways, sometimes with one fairway corridor serving two holes. None of the fairways are less than 80 yards wide, several single fairways top out at more than 100 yards wide and the connecting fairways are stretched beyond 150 yards. 

“A 60- or 70-yard-wide fairway just doesn’t cut it out there because it shrinks visually in the scale of that landscape,” Collins said. “And so, a 60-yard fairway would look 30 yards wide. You hit a ball out there and walk down into the fairway, you’re like, ‘My God, it’s gigantic, there’s no way I could have missed this fairway.’ You need features that are just that big out there.”

Landmand
The green for the short par-4 17th as the grass grows in at Landmand Golf Club in Homer, Nebraska (Courtesy of Landmand Golf Club)

 The greens at Landmand are similarly huge. Average greens at most U.S. courses are between 5,000 and 7,000 square feet – purely for example, Augusta National Golf Club’s greens average just over 6,400 square feet, while those at Pebble Beach Golf Links are tiny at about 3,500 square feet. At Landmand, King-Collins constructed putting surfaces that frequently blow past 20,000 square feet. 

As a comparison for King-Collins fans, Collins said he receives frequent comments on the size of the fourth green at Sweetens Cove, an Alps-inspired putting surface stretching some 80 yards front to back. At Landmand, the fourth green from Sweetens would be only the fifth-largest putting surface.

Collins cites the par-3 fifth at Landmand as a great example of a large green fitting a big landscape. The approach from the back tee is some 240 yards across a chasm to a putting surface of more than 25,000 square feet. 

“You look at it, and yeah it seems big, but then you get on it and realize it’s huge,” Collins said. “It has to be to fit. Standing on the tee, even a 12,000-square-foot green on top of that ridge would look stupid. It would look like a pimple on the ass of an elephant. It would look like we shied away from the landscape. We had to build features that embraced that boldness.”

It’s all part of the width and size serving strategy. Players shouldn’t just whack away and expect an easy next shot from a wide, forgiving fairway, especially if the wind blows. There’s skill to discerning the best route to any hole, Collins said, and golfers better think before they swing. 

“Every shot on every golf course we ever do, we want to have a meaning behind it,” he said. “We don’t want any hole to take a shot off. We always want the golfer engaged. That may mean hazard placement, or in a lot of cases at a place like Landmand, it’s a big contour. … Each hole at Landmand was built to ask varying versions of some type of questions, and a lot of that is through contour.”

PGA Tour players choose: Whom would they hire to design a golf course?

Credit must be given where credit is due. I was asking Davis Love III a question about golf course architecture as we cruised around the Sea Island Resort Plantation Course that he had just renovated and Love gave my question the Heisman stiff-arm. …

Credit must be given where credit is due.

I was asking Davis Love III a question about golf course architecture as we cruised around the Sea Island Resort Plantation Course that he had just renovated and Love gave my question the Heisman stiff-arm. He had a better question in mind.

“What you should really be asking guys is if you were going to build a golf course and start a club, who would you hire? Who would you pay to do the design work? I’d hire Ben Crenshaw,” he said. “I don’t mean that to offend my other friends in the industry, but I love his work. I’d want Ben Crenshaw with a little bit flatter greens.”

I hated to admit it but it didn’t take me long to realize that Love’s question was actually better than the one I proposed and had the potential for some very revealing answers. So, I took Love’s advice and the following answers reveal that PGA Tour pros have more of a reverence for the Golden Age designers than they are given credit for and that minimalist design and the latest trend of wide fairways, expanded greens and tree removal to create more strategic angles and options is in vogue among the play-for-pay ranks too.

Harris English was the first person to ask, “Can I pick a dead guy?” Why not? As a result, there are just as many Alister Mackenzie, Donald Ross and Seth Raynor selections as Coore-Crenshaw, Gil Hanse and Tom Doak.

Hey, Davis, this one’s for you.

Paul Azinger

“I would hire Gil Hanse. He has an incredible feel and sense of what is technically sound and visually pleasing. I love his personality and I think he’d be easy to work with.”

Aaron Baddeley

“I like Coore-Crenshaw. They don’t move too much dirt. They let the ground dictate the design.”

Zac Blair

“King-Collins, who did Sweetens Cove, because they are the best. We’re going to do The Buck Club (in Utah). Can’t wait.”

Scott Brown

“It depends on the land. If it’s an unbelievable canvas, I’d choose Coore-Crenshaw.”

Patrick Cantlay

“Alister Mackenzie would be my dead guy. Coore-Crenshaw among the living.”

The 224 yards par 3, 17th hole at the Castle Stuart Golf Links designed by Mark Parsinen and Gil Hanse in Inverness, Nairnshire, Scotland. (David Cannon/Getty Images)

Brandel Chamblee

“Gil Hanse because his golf courses strike every note. He doesn’t make them too hard or too easy, he just makes them interesting and beautiful. At least in my view, he captures the essence of what architecture is meant to be. Who is going to take a piece of property and give you an incredible array of holes with great elements of strategy and everything you’d ever want in a golf course, getting the most out of a piece of land in the most affable way? I’d probably go with Gil Hanse.”

Harris English

“Seth Raynor. He built fun courses that have stood the test of time.”

Tony Finau

“Alister MacKenzie. All his courses are the real deal.”

Rickie Fowler

“I’d want to be involved in the design because I enjoy golf course architecture. My favorite style is links golf. I love what Coore-Crenshaw are doing and having a duo where one of them has been a player makes for a great combo.”

Jim Furyk

“Coore-Crenshaw. All of their courses are fun to play.”

Links at Perry Cabin by Pete Dye
Links at Perry Cabin by Pete Dye.

Chesson Hadley

“Pete Dye. I’ve always played well on his courses.”

Morgan Hoffmann

“Pete Dye among the living and Donald Ross among the deceased. I grew up on a Ross course and I love them.”

Russell Knox

“Coore and Crenshaw have done a great job. It must be very difficult because there are very few courses that are spot on. All of us pros think we know more than we do, but every course there’s somewhere where I think, ‘What the hell were they thinking?’ I’d love to get into that world as the years go on. I like the new-school of make it wider and angles but at the same time there needs to be narrow holes too. There needs to be variety. That’s what makes Seminole (Golf Club in Juno Beach, Florida) great.”

Matt Kuchar

“Alister MacKenzie. I don’t think I’ve ever played one of his courses that I didn’t like.”

Jagged mountains and the Sea of Crotez line Tom Doak’s first course design in Mexico.

Peter Malnati

“Tom Doak. He’s a minimalist.”

Maverick McNealy

“Gil Hanse. I see his courses really well.”

Francesco Molinari

“Coore-Crenshaw. Their work at Pinehurst No. 2 was really good.”

Patrick Rodgers

“Gil Hanse. I feel like his philosophy is most in alignment with the origins of the game and making it fun.”

Adam Scott

“Coore-Crenshaw because I’ve never played a course they’ve designed that I didn’t like.”

Steve Stricker

“Alister MacKenzie. Pasatiempo was my favorite course I played in college, and I’ve been a MacKenzie fan ever since.”

Chris Stroud

“Seth Raynor. I love his unique design style.”

Bo Van Pelt

“Gil Hanse. He restored Southern Hills, where I play frequently, and did a great job.”