Weekend Review: William Zepeda, Luis Alberto Lopez overwhelm opponents

Weekend Review: William Zepeda and Luis Alberto Lopez overwhelmed their opponents in separate locations over the weekend.

A critical look at the past week in boxing

BIGGEST WINNER
William Zepeda

It’s easy to understand why fans – particularly those from Zepeda’s native Mexico – are falling in love with him. Everyone adores a take-no-prisoners warrior who throws a crazy amount of punches, all of which are meant to inflict serious harm. That’s what we witnessed in it’s most brutal form on Saturday in California, where the 135-pound contender pummeled a good opponent in veteran Mercito Gesta until the carnage was stopped in the sixth round. The winner connected on 286 of a remarkable 618 punches in the five-plus rounds, according to CompuBox. More striking, 242 of the punches he landed were power shots, which is how he was able to break down a tough foe like Gesta. The formula could take Zepeda (29-0, 25 KOs) a long way. Can he beat the likes of 135-pound luminaries Devin Haney, Gervonta Davis, Shakur Stevenson and Vasiliy Lomachenko? I have my doubts because of their special skill level. At the same time, history tells us that Zepeda’s pressure-fighting approach to the sport might be the style that could give slick technicians problems. Think Floyd Mayweather vs. Jose Luis Castillo. Let’s hope Zepeda gets the opportunity to face that type of opponent soon. He has earned it.

 

BIGGEST WINNER II
Luis Alberto Lopez

Lopez (29-2, 16 KOs) is similar to his countryman Zepeda, a fit, durable bruiser who outworks his opponents. The 126-pound titleholder did that again on Friday in Corpus Christi, Texas, delivering a unanimous-decision victory over determined, but overmatched veteran Joet Gonzalez. Lopez threw 881 punches (landing 195) over the 12 rounds, which is a busy night for almost anyone in the sport. The victory was his third in a row over quality opponents, following a decision over Josh Warrington to win his belt in December and a fifth-round knockout of Michael Conlan in his first defense in May. That’s the kind of run that gets the attention of pundits, fans and prospective opponents. One difference between Lopez and Zepeda? The 126-pound division isn’t nearly as top heavy as 135, meaning the IBF beltholder would have a good chance of beating any of his fellow titleholders – Rey Vargas (WBC), Leigh Wood (WBA) and Robeisy Ramirez (WBO) – and becoming a unified champion. Lopez has come a long way since he was outpointed by Ruben Villa in 2019.

 

BIGGEST LOSERS
Joet Gonzalez and Mercito Gesta

Mercito Gesta got caught in a storm Saturday night. Golden Boy Promotions

Gonzalez (26-4, 15 KOs) and Gesta (34-4-3, 17 KOs) probably will never win their biggest fights – if they get more of them – but you have to respect them. They both gave absolutely everything they had against overwhelming opposition over the weekend, which is all anyone can expect of a fighter. That’s little consolation for Gonzalez, who has now failed in three attempts to win major world titles. The 29-year-old Angeleno has become one of those fighters who is considered capable but not good enough to reach the pinnacle of the sport, a legacy that can haunt a boxer for the remainder of his days. Gesta won his first two fights after a 2½-year layoff, including an encouraging decision over former titleholder Joseph Diaz Jr. in March. However, a brutal knockout loss in his third fight on Saturday put an agonizing end to his momentum. And, at 35, one wonders how many more meaningful opportunities he’ll receive. We might’ve seen the last of the Filipino warrior as an elite fighter.

 

BIGGEST NO-BRAINER
Referee seminars

I spent a day at Jack Reiss’ recent three-day “Sole Arbiter” refereeing seminar in Ventura, California. My main take away? The conference or something like it should be mandatory for anyone who ends up as the third person in the ring, a sentiment expressed by every participant with whom I spoke that day. Reiss, fellow refs Russell Mora and Thomas Taylor, and guest speakers pack an impressive amount of material – power-point slides, video review and more – into 26 hours of instruction, providing both experienced and developing officials with the input they need to become better referees. To be clear: Many referees are good at what they do, particularly in jurisdictions that provide quality training and maintain high standards. However, even those officials can improve. And God knows that some refs are clueless because of a lack of universal standards and questionable selection processes, which is a frightening thought because the lives of the fighters are in their hands. If you want to realize your potential as a referee, find a way to get to “Sole Arbiter.” You’ll be inspired by the instruction and passion of everyone involved. And you’ll leave with more valuable tools than you came with. You owe it to yourself, you owe it to the boxers.

[lawrence-related id=38931,38920,38911]

Weekend Review: William Zepeda, Luis Alberto Lopez overwhelm opponents

Weekend Review: William Zepeda and Luis Alberto Lopez overwhelmed their opponents in separate locations over the weekend.

A critical look at the past week in boxing

BIGGEST WINNER
William Zepeda

It’s easy to understand why fans – particularly those from Zepeda’s native Mexico – are falling in love with him. Everyone adores a take-no-prisoners warrior who throws a crazy amount of punches, all of which are meant to inflict serious harm. That’s what we witnessed in it’s most brutal form on Saturday in California, where the 135-pound contender pummeled a good opponent in veteran Mercito Gesta until the carnage was stopped in the sixth round. The winner connected on 286 of a remarkable 618 punches in the five-plus rounds, according to CompuBox. More striking, 242 of the punches he landed were power shots, which is how he was able to break down a tough foe like Gesta. The formula could take Zepeda (29-0, 25 KOs) a long way. Can he beat the likes of 135-pound luminaries Devin Haney, Gervonta Davis, Shakur Stevenson and Vasiliy Lomachenko? I have my doubts because of their special skill level. At the same time, history tells us that Zepeda’s pressure-fighting approach to the sport might be the style that could give slick technicians problems. Think Floyd Mayweather vs. Jose Luis Castillo. Let’s hope Zepeda gets the opportunity to face that type of opponent soon. He has earned it.

 

BIGGEST WINNER II
Luis Alberto Lopez

Lopez (29-2, 16 KOs) is similar to his countryman Zepeda, a fit, durable bruiser who outworks his opponents. The 126-pound titleholder did that again on Friday in Corpus Christi, Texas, delivering a unanimous-decision victory over determined, but overmatched veteran Joet Gonzalez. Lopez threw 881 punches (landing 195) over the 12 rounds, which is a busy night for almost anyone in the sport. The victory was his third in a row over quality opponents, following a decision over Josh Warrington to win his belt in December and a fifth-round knockout of Michael Conlan in his first defense in May. That’s the kind of run that gets the attention of pundits, fans and prospective opponents. One difference between Lopez and Zepeda? The 126-pound division isn’t nearly as top heavy as 135, meaning the IBF beltholder would have a good chance of beating any of his fellow titleholders – Rey Vargas (WBC), Leigh Wood (WBA) and Robeisy Ramirez (WBO) – and becoming a unified champion. Lopez has come a long way since he was outpointed by Ruben Villa in 2019.

 

BIGGEST LOSERS
Joet Gonzalez and Mercito Gesta

Mercito Gesta got caught in a storm Saturday night. Golden Boy Promotions

Gonzalez (26-4, 15 KOs) and Gesta (34-4-3, 17 KOs) probably will never win their biggest fights – if they get more of them – but you have to respect them. They both gave absolutely everything they had against overwhelming opposition over the weekend, which is all anyone can expect of a fighter. That’s little consolation for Gonzalez, who has now failed in three attempts to win major world titles. The 29-year-old Angeleno has become one of those fighters who is considered capable but not good enough to reach the pinnacle of the sport, a legacy that can haunt a boxer for the remainder of his days. Gesta won his first two fights after a 2½-year layoff, including an encouraging decision over former titleholder Joseph Diaz Jr. in March. However, a brutal knockout loss in his third fight on Saturday put an agonizing end to his momentum. And, at 35, one wonders how many more meaningful opportunities he’ll receive. We might’ve seen the last of the Filipino warrior as an elite fighter.

 

BIGGEST NO-BRAINER
Referee seminars

I spent a day at Jack Reiss’ recent three-day “Sole Arbiter” refereeing seminar in Ventura, California. My main take away? The conference or something like it should be mandatory for anyone who ends up as the third person in the ring, a sentiment expressed by every participant with whom I spoke that day. Reiss, fellow refs Russell Mora and Thomas Taylor, and guest speakers pack an impressive amount of material – power-point slides, video review and more – into 26 hours of instruction, providing both experienced and developing officials with the input they need to become better referees. To be clear: Many referees are good at what they do, particularly in jurisdictions that provide quality training and maintain high standards. However, even those officials can improve. And God knows that some refs are clueless because of a lack of universal standards and questionable selection processes, which is a frightening thought because the lives of the fighters are in their hands. If you want to realize your potential as a referee, find a way to get to “Sole Arbiter.” You’ll be inspired by the instruction and passion of everyone involved. And you’ll leave with more valuable tools than you came with. You owe it to yourself, you owe it to the boxers.

[lawrence-related id=38931,38920,38911]

‘Sole Arbiter’ seminar crafts elite referees one participant at a time

The “Sole Arbiter” seminar is crafting elite referees one participant at a time.

Referees who are serious about honing their craft find their way to the Four Points Sheraton in Ventura, California.

That’s where referee Jack Reiss’ annual three-day seminar “Sole Arbiter” has taken place the last three years, including earlier this month. About 50 refs from around the world took part this year, packing a conference room at the seaside hotel with a thirst for knowledge and passion for the sport they love.

Those in attendance have had some sort of training, mostly in their local jurisdictions or in conjunction with the sanctioning bodies. What’s special about Reiss’ seminar? It’s exhaustive nature.

Boxing Junkie spoke with a number of the attendees. And they all said the same thing when they were asked why they traveled to Southern California and paid $1,250 out of their own pockets to take part: the quality of instruction and the amount of material covered.

Title Boxing provided bags and gloves to the participants of the refereeing seminar.

Some seminars are limited to one day, some even only a few hours. This one lasts 26 hours.

“I believe Jack Reiss is one of the best referees nowadays,” said Leszek Jankowiak, an official who made the trip from Poland. “This is my second year. I was here last year, too. It’s the most comprehensive seminar for referees. That’s it.

“Is there something like it in Europe? No, not at all.”

The seminar was established out of necessity.

Reiss, who has conducted classes for the Association of Boxing Commissions and several sanctioning bodies, was asked by California State Athletic Commission officials to create a new program in part because a number of the state’s top referees were nearing retirement age.

However, Reiss also wanted to give referees like Jankowiak a chance to expand their knowledge base, which he hopes will help establish high standards worldwide.

The format isn’t complicated. He, along with seasoned colleagues Russell Mora (Nevada) and Thomas Taylor (California), as well as guest speakers, project 800 PowerPoint slides on all the key components of refereeing onto a big screen and break them down in minute detail.

Also, they show hundreds of videos depicting actual fights so they can dissect the performance of the referee on the screen, who is sometimes sitting in the conference room.

It’s one thing to discuss what is and isn’t a foul, for example. It’s another thing to discuss it and then see scenarios in professional fights on video to illustrate the point, which invariably leads to a series of questions and edifying answers.

This is what Jankowiak meant when he used the word “comprehensive.”

“This is the top, elite school for referees,” said Diana Drews-Milani, a German-based referee for the Swiss Boxing Federation. “… I like to go to the (sanctioning body) conventions but they are always a one-day referee class. In this one you have three days to go through every scenario and have time to ask everything. You meet all the people, you discuss boxing.

“It’s just really helpful to improve and then you have mentors to talk to later on.”

Reiss provided an example to illustrate his approach to teaching the material.

“We showed a guy getting hit with a low blow,” he said. “We asked the referees [at the seminar] whether the ref was correct in ruling a low blow. Ninety percent said yes. Then we showed it in slow motion from another angle. The reality was that the fighter who was hit pushed his opponent’s head down, which changed the trajectory of punch.

“… We want people to understand what they see. I think that’s the most important thing they walk away with.”

Joel Scobie, a referee from British Columbia, Canada, also mentioned the comprehensive nature of the course but added that it wouldn’t work without knowledgeable instructors.

Reiss estimated that he, Mora (who is retired) and Taylor have worked a combined 2,500 fights, 10% of which had world titles on the line. That means these referees have seen everything along the way.

That experience, combined with the complete curriculum, is what compels both veteran and developing referees to invest their time and money to attend the seminar.

“You’re learning from the very best,” Scobie said. “… A lot of officials, myself included, learn from other officials in their local jurisdictions. You learn to do things based on how the senior guy in your area does things. What you learn here (at Reiss’ seminar) is that instead of mimicking a mechanic that another official taught you, you also learn how to do the mechanic and the why behind every step.

“Once you really understand you can be so much better as a referee.”

The need for such a conference was obvious when Reiss created it, which can be attributed in part to the lack of a central governing body to establish and enforce standards.

The top jurisdictions produce competent officials because of proper training and high expectations. Others often employ referees who aren’t as well equipped to do the job, which can place boxers in danger and damage the integrity of the sport.

Many in the latter group were selected to be officials not because of their qualifications but who they know, one reason Reiss believes the state of refereeing worldwide is “in disarray.”

Can he fix that with his seminars? Of course not.

The idea of “Sole Arbiter” was to create the best possible instructional program and open it to whomever has the desire, time and resources to take part, which creates better refereeing one motivated participant at a time.

“I can only change what I can control,” Reiss said. “… It’s the serenity prayer: ‘God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change and the courage to change the things I can.’ That’s all we can do.

“I know people are grateful to us for opening up our playbook to them, giving them mentorship. They’re getting something they can’t get where they live.”

‘Sole Arbiter’ seminar crafts elite referees one participant at a time

The “Sole Arbiter” seminar is crafting elite referees one participant at a time.

Referees who are serious about honing their craft find their way to the Four Points Sheraton in Ventura, California.

That’s where referee Jack Reiss’ annual three-day seminar “Sole Arbiter” has taken place the last three years, including earlier this month. About 50 refs from around the world took part this year, packing a conference room at the seaside hotel with a thirst for knowledge and passion for the sport they love.

Those in attendance have had some sort of training, mostly in their local jurisdictions or in conjunction with the sanctioning bodies. What’s special about Reiss’ seminar? It’s exhaustive nature.

Boxing Junkie spoke with a number of the attendees. And they all said the same thing when they were asked why they traveled to Southern California and paid $1,250 out of their own pockets to take part: the quality of instruction and the amount of material covered.

Title Boxing provided bags and gloves to the participants of the refereeing seminar.

Some seminars are limited to one day, some even only a few hours. This one lasts 26 hours.

“I believe Jack Reiss is one of the best referees nowadays,” said Leszek Jankowiak, an official who made the trip from Poland. “This is my second year. I was here last year, too. It’s the most comprehensive seminar for referees. That’s it.

“Is there something like it in Europe? No, not at all.”

The seminar was established out of necessity.

Reiss, who has conducted classes for the Association of Boxing Commissions and several sanctioning bodies, was asked by California State Athletic Commission officials to create a new program in part because a number of the state’s top referees were nearing retirement age.

However, Reiss also wanted to give referees like Jankowiak a chance to expand their knowledge base, which he hopes will help establish high standards worldwide.

The format isn’t complicated. He, along with seasoned colleagues Russell Mora (Nevada) and Thomas Taylor (California), as well as guest speakers, project 800 PowerPoint slides on all the key components of refereeing onto a big screen and break them down in minute detail.

Also, they show hundreds of videos depicting actual fights so they can dissect the performance of the referee on the screen, who is sometimes sitting in the conference room.

It’s one thing to discuss what is and isn’t a foul, for example. It’s another thing to discuss it and then see scenarios in professional fights on video to illustrate the point, which invariably leads to a series of questions and edifying answers.

This is what Jankowiak meant when he used the word “comprehensive.”

“This is the top, elite school for referees,” said Diana Drews-Milani, a German-based referee for the Swiss Boxing Federation. “… I like to go to the (sanctioning body) conventions but they are always a one-day referee class. In this one you have three days to go through every scenario and have time to ask everything. You meet all the people, you discuss boxing.

“It’s just really helpful to improve and then you have mentors to talk to later on.”

Reiss provided an example to illustrate his approach to teaching the material.

“We showed a guy getting hit with a low blow,” he said. “We asked the referees [at the seminar] whether the ref was correct in ruling a low blow. Ninety percent said yes. Then we showed it in slow motion from another angle. The reality was that the fighter who was hit pushed his opponent’s head down, which changed the trajectory of punch.

“… We want people to understand what they see. I think that’s the most important thing they walk away with.”

Joel Scobie, a referee from British Columbia, Canada, also mentioned the comprehensive nature of the course but added that it wouldn’t work without knowledgeable instructors.

Reiss estimated that he, Mora (who is retired) and Taylor have worked a combined 2,500 fights, 10% of which had world titles on the line. That means these referees have seen everything along the way.

That experience, combined with the complete curriculum, is what compels both veteran and developing referees to invest their time and money to attend the seminar.

“You’re learning from the very best,” Scobie said. “… A lot of officials, myself included, learn from other officials in their local jurisdictions. You learn to do things based on how the senior guy in your area does things. What you learn here (at Reiss’ seminar) is that instead of mimicking a mechanic that another official taught you, you also learn how to do the mechanic and the why behind every step.

“Once you really understand you can be so much better as a referee.”

The need for such a conference was obvious when Reiss created it, which can be attributed in part to the lack of a central governing body to establish and enforce standards.

The top jurisdictions produce competent officials because of proper training and high expectations. Others often employ referees who aren’t as well equipped to do the job, which can place boxers in danger and damage the integrity of the sport.

Many in the latter group were selected to be officials not because of their qualifications but who they know, one reason Reiss believes the state of refereeing worldwide is “in disarray.”

Can he fix that with his seminars? Of course not.

The idea of “Sole Arbiter” was to create the best possible instructional program and open it to whomever has the desire, time and resources to take part, which creates better refereeing one motivated participant at a time.

“I can only change what I can control,” Reiss said. “… It’s the serenity prayer: ‘God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change and the courage to change the things I can.’ That’s all we can do.

“I know people are grateful to us for opening up our playbook to them, giving them mentorship. They’re getting something they can’t get where they live.”

Good, bad, worse: Ryan Garcia has our attention

Ryan Garcia still has a lot to prove but first-round knockouts — like the one he turned in Saturday — generate excitement.

GOOD

Ryan Garcia’s one-punch knockout of Francisco Fonseca only 1 minute, 20 seconds into their lightweight fight Friday doesn’t prove much because Fonseca is nothing special.

The excitement Garcia created with his second consecutive first-round stoppage is genuine, though. He’s blossoming into a potential star. That’s what happens when your results in the ring start to catch up to the hype.

Indeed, almost any fighter would love to be in Garcia’s position.

Of course, he still has a long way to go. Only 21, he still hasn’t faced a legitimate threat. Only a true test can give us an idea of how good Garcia truly is and can be.

It could come soon. Oscar De La Hoya, Garcia’s promoter, is eyeing a matchup between Garcia and former three-division titleholder Jorge Linares in July. If Garcia can win that fight – a big if, in my opinion – he will have made a strong statement.

I wonder whether Garcia’s handlers would live to regret the decision to fight the gifted Linares, who demonstrated in his fourth-round knockout of Carlos Morales on the Garcia-Fonseca card that he has more to give, but I would applaud the bold move.

Garcia, bubbling with confidence, definitely thinks big. He reeled off immediately after his stoppage of Fonseca a gauntlet of opponents he’d like to face in the near future – Linares, Luke Campbell, Gervonta Davis and Devin Haney.

That’s quite a gauntlet he’s laid out for himself. We’ll see how many of them – if any – he fights and how he performs once he does.

In the meantime, Garcia has our attention. That’s more than all but a few professional boxers can say.

 

BAD

Referee Jack Reiss watches closely as a wild ending to the Abel Ramos-Bryant Perrella fight unfolds. Stephanie Trapp / TGB Promotions

The last-second stoppage of the Abel Ramos-Bryant Perrella fight on the Caleb Plant-Vincent Feigenbutz card Saturday in Nashville might’ve seemed cruel to Perrella, who was winning on all cards when he lost in an instant.

The fact is referee Jack Reiss was following the rules.

According to the Unified Rules of Boxing, under which that bout was fought, “A fighter cannot be saved by the bell in any round, including the final round.” That means, if I understand it correctly, an injured boxer must be in condition to fight even if the three minutes of the last round has expired.

Reiss judged that Perrella, who had gone down twice in the final seconds, was in no condition to continue and waved off the fight.

The frustration expressed by Perrella’s cornerman Michael Nowling in the ring immediately after the stoppage was understandable: “We won every round and they took it from us with 1 second left.”

The rules took it from Perrella, not “they.” And not Reiss. The referee, as trainer and TV analyst Joe Goossen said, isn’t a timekeeper. His job is to look after the welfare of the combatants in the ring with him and follow the rules.

That’s what Reiss did. Good stoppage.

 

WORSE

Vincent Feigenbutz (left) didn’t have the tools to compete with Caleb Plant on Saturday night. Stephanie Trapp / TGB Promotions

It seems to me that sanctioning bodies are supposed to have a champion and then rank the next 10 best contenders in each division.

The reality? The alphabet organizations rank their contenders based less on merit than on how much money they can make. The result of that is a matchup like Caleb Plant vs. Vincent Feigenbutz for Plant’s IBF super middleweight title.

Feigenbutz, ranked No. 1 by the IBF, is a strong, sturdy young man but he had no business in the ring with a fighter of Plant’s ability. The fact he was the mandatory challenger is yet another red flag that the system is a mess.

Plant’s title defense, which ended by 10th-round knockout, couldn’t even be described as a competitive fight. Feigenbutz, an eight-year pro, has rudimentary skills and courage but not the tools to give the titleholder a legitimate challenge. Aren’t title fights supposed to be competitive at least on paper?

Anyone watching that fight who didn’t feel sorry for the German in the latter rounds has no heart. And anyone not disgusted with the IBF has no sense.

Sadly, there is no solution is sight. Some sort of oversight body – ideally an international one – might help but that isn’t going to happen any time soon. I personally try to minimize the sanctioning bodies by mentioning them infrequently but that’s only a small gesture.

We’re stuck with the murky alphabet soup and mismatches like Plant-Feigenbutz. I just hope fans can see through their self-serving game.

Read more:

Ryan Garcia needs only 1:20 to knock out Francisco Fonseca

Abel Ramos shocks Bryant Perrella with controversial 10th-round stoppage

Caleb Plant stops Vincent Feigenbutz in 10th round of hometown debut

 

Ramos-Perrella ref Jack Reiss: Timing of stoppage not valid criticism

Referee Jack Reiss said he couldn’t win either way when he stopped the Abel Ramos-Bryant Perrella fight with one second remaining.

Referee Jack Reiss was already on the hot seat for what some believe was a long count in the first Deontay Wilder-Tyson Fury fight. The temperature was turned up another notch on Saturday.

Reiss worked the welterweight fight between Abel Ramos and Bryant Perrella on the Caleb Plant-Vincent Feigenbutz card in Nashville. Perrella was leading on the cards when he went down twice in the final moments of the scheduled 10-round fight and didn’t respond well to commands, prompting Reiss to stop the fight.

There was only one second remaining.

The result immediately brought back memories of the first Julio Cesar Chavez-Meldrick Taylor fight, which was stopped by Richard Steele with 2 seconds left in a fight Taylor was winning. It also made Reiss the centerpiece in another controversy.

Perrella, hoping to become a 147-pound contender, was ahead comfortably on all three cards when he went down from an uppercut with about 35 seconds left in the fight and then got up shaky legs. He went down again in the final seconds. Again, he got up, but this time Reiss didn’t like what he saw and waved off the fight.

Perrella seemed to accept his fate. His trainer, Michael Nowling, was angry.

“We won every round and they took it from us with 1 second left,” he said moments after the fight ended.

Here’s what Reiss saw at the end:

“Perrella seems to be winning the entire fight. He got caught really good in the 10th round. When he got up, I would say he was only at about 60 percent. He didn’t walk well, he wasn’t stable. I wanted to give him every opportunity so I let it go and watched how he responded.

“I want a fighter to run or hold. The worse thing they can do is stand there and fight back. That’s instinctual. When they run or hold, it’s thoughtful. The second shot was even more devastating. I said, “Walk over there and come back. He couldn’t control his body. He walked straight across the ring and stumbled. That told me he was not able to defend himself.

“Forget the clock. The clock had nothing to do with it. There are no rules in the book that say, ‘If the end of the fight in near, you should stall and let it continue.’”

Of course, the clock is what everyone is focused on. Had Perrella been allowed to continue for just one more tick of the clock, he would’ve been victorious. That’s why some have been critical of Reiss.

The veteran referee, one of the most respected officials in the business, said he ended up in a no-win situation.

“That’s boxing,” he said. “I didn’t knock him down. I’m not the one who let my guard down in the 10th round. I’m the one who had to deal with it. If I stalled and let it go, I would have been crucified the other way. I would’ve robbed Ramos of the TKO he deserved. Everyone would’ve said I’m a cheater. ‘Why didn’t you wave it off?’ I was between a rock and a hard place.

“I’m not happy about the way it was stopped but the only issue is the clock. And that’s not a valid argument.”

Deontay Wilder, Tyson Fury will have say in choosing officials

The NSAC will give a list of officials to Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury and allow them to toss those with whom they aren’t comfortable.

The Nevada State Athletic Commission evidently isn’t taking any chances with officials for the Feb. 22 Deontay Wilder-Tyson Fury rematch in Las Vegas.

The NSAC reportedly will give a list of at least three possible referees and 10 to 12 judges to the fighters and allow them to toss anyone with whom they aren’t comfortable.

“[NSAC Executive Director] Bob Bennett promised me everybody will be satisfied,” Fury co-promoter Bob Arum told BoxingScene.com. “The truth is, unlike what happened last time, the judges here are not going to matter. If it goes to a decision, Fury wins the fight. If it goes to a knockout, the judges don’t matter.”

The officials are an issue because of the 2018 fight between Wilder and Fury in Los Angeles, which was scored a draw. Fury, who went down twice but controlled much of the fight, thought he was robbed and some agree with him.

Also, some have suggested California referee Jack Reiss should’ve stopped the fight when Fury went down in Round 12 even though he appeared to beat the count.

As BoxingScene pointed out, the referee will be from Nevada and the judges will be configured in one of two ways: one British judge, one American judge and one neutral judge, or all three neutral judges.

 

Gervonta Davis stops Yuriorkis Gamboa on strange night

Gervonta Davis stopped Yuriorkis Gamboa as expected but the events of the evening were out of the ordinary.

Well, that was weird.

Gervonta Davis did what most people expected him to do Saturday night in Atlanta, which was to knock out Yuriorkis Gamboa. No one could’ve predicted how he would arrive at that point, though.

The peculiarities started in Round 2, when Gamboa went down from a hard left hand and then complained after the round that he had injured his right foot when fell. “I can’t go! I can’t go! he said emphatically, according to a translator, yet he continued.

Gamboa said after the fight that he ruptured his Achilles heal, although that wasn’t confirmed.

So let’s take stock right here: Davis is fighting a 38-year-old who is well past his prime and has some sort of injury that makes it difficult for him to maneuver. Easy knock out, right?

Uhhhh, no. First of all, Gamboa was in survival mode almost the entire fight. A veteran who wants to survive is difficult to stop. And second, Davis was strangly inactive. He landed more than enough power shots to win the fight – and put Gamboa down three times – but he allowed Gamboa to stick around by being relatively passive.

Davis threw only 321 punches in 11-plus rounds, according to CompuBox. That equates to a sluggish performance.

Poor conditioning? The rising young star missed weight Friday afternoon even though he was fighting for the first time as a full-fledged lightweight, which raises questions about his preparation for this fight — disturbing questions.

In the end, Davis (23-0, 22 KOs) won almost every round, put Gamboa (30-3, 18 KOs) down in Rounds 2, 8 and 12 and got his stoppage when a huge left uppercut put Gamboa on his pants and convinced referee Jack Reiss that enough was enough.

Still, it wasn’t Davis’ greatest night. He admitted it afterward, saying “I believe my performance was a C+.”

“Coming into this fight I knew Gamboa would be a tough opponent,” Davis said. “Everybody wrote him off but I knew he was a veteran. As you could see in the ring I was catching him and hurting him but he was still alert. I knew he was different from any opponent I fought before.”

The knockdown in the second round was hardly surprising given Davis’ reputation. What followed had everyone confused.

In the corner, between the second and third rounds, it wasn’t clear whether Gamboa had a problem with his body or his shoe. It was only obvious that he began favoring the right leg after he went down.

The one-time Cuban amateur star, an Olympic gold medalist in 2004, moved about the ring as best he could — and it wasn’t pretty — and often held Davis when he got close enough to land punches in the next few rounds.

After the fourth round, one of his cornerman wrapped tape around the foot to give it some stability and that seemed to help to some extent. Gamboa moved a little better and, while still in survival mode and looking about 10 years older than 38, he even gave Davis trouble at times.

All three judges reportedly gave Gamboa Round 7, which was his only victory on this night.

Davis, who had never been past nine rounds, seemed to tire down the stretch even with his low punch output. He threw and connected on hard shots here and there but they were infrequent and rarely came in combination. That allowed Gamboa to survive as long as he did.

The one thing Davis did well was end the fight in dramatic fashion. He had landed a few telling blows, with Gamboa trying to hold on, when the left came from underneath and sent him crashing to the canvas.

Reiss, standing over a sitting Gamboa, took one good look and waved his arms. There was no point in letting the strange fight continue.

“It was a great experience to have a game, tough opponent on my resume like him,” the soft spoken Davis said. “I’m only 25 years old, learning every day. 2020 will be a big year.”

Gamboa was asked to explain what happened with his foot.

“I think I ruptured by Achilles tendon,” he said. “… I fell in the second round and hurt it. I was never able to put much pressure on it. … I’m a warrior, I kept going, but as soon as I felt it I knew it was ruptured. People could see me hopping around.

“I told my corner, ‘This is a problem.’ But I wanted to keep going.”

Gamboa also said he will keep fighting, although that could be difficult if he really did rupture his Achilles. And, of course, Davis, one of the most popular young fighters in the game, is just getting into high gear.

He mentioned next year. That could mean Leo Santa Cruz or another big name around his weight. He was asked about that after his C+ performance and suddenly went from humble to just a little bit cocky.

“I’m the top dog,” he said. “… Bring ‘em on.”

Strange night.

Jermell Charlo stops Tony Harrison to regain title in Round 11

Jermell Charlo ended a close fight by stopping Tony Harrison in Round 11 to regain the 154-pound title Harrison took from him a year ago.

One can’t let his guard down against a fighter like Jermell Charlo, not even for a split second. Tony Harrison did so and lost his title as a result.

Harrison, defending the junior middleweight belt he took from Charlo by a controversial decision almost exactly a year ago, said afterward that he was coasting past his rival in the rematch Saturday in Ontario, California. And some will agree with him. One judge and I had him winning 95-94 after 10 rounds.

Then one punch rendered all else irrelevant. Charlo landed a left hook midway through Round 11 that sent Harrison reeling and then down. And he was hurt badly. He got up but then absorbed a series of hard punches that put him down again and prompted Charlo, assuming he had won, to leap onto the ropes in celebration.

Harrison got up again but one more barrage of punches with his back against the ropes convinced referee Jack Reiss to end the fight. The official time was 2:28.

Just like that, Charlo turned a close fight into a convincing victory to regain the title he lost to a man he really can’t stand.

“I got my belt back,” a jubilant Charlo said in the ring immediately afterward. “… [And] I didn’t leave it up to the judges.”

The fight didn’t play out as many expected. Harrison, the boxer, walked down Charlo much of the fight. And Charlo, who was assertive at times, wasn’t quite as aggressive as some people thought he needed to be to win the fight.

The new champ was very aggressive in Round 2, coming out at the bell like a wild man. Harrison, a clever defensive fighter, was able to withstand the pressure until a left hook from Charlo put him on his behind.

The rest of the fight was give and take, as a number of rounds could’ve gone either way. One could argue that Harrison controlled the action with his jab and enough power punches – including many to the body – to win the majority of the rounds.

Plus, many of Charlo’s punches, as ill-intended as they were, landed on Harrison’s gloves and shouldn’t have been considered scoring blows.

At the same time, Charlo was busier than Harrison at a number of junctures and was able to get enough punches – some of them hard, eye-catching shots – through Harrison’s guard.

Two judges had Charlo winning by the same score after 10 rounds – 96-93, or six rounds to four. The third judge gave Harrison six rounds. Those scores or anything in between were reasonable given the competitiveness of the fight.

And none of it mattered midway through Round 11. The left hook changed everything. Harrison was able to get up from both knockdowns that round but never fully recovered, which became obvious to Reiss in the end.

Some people will argue that the stoppage was premature because Harrison wasn’t taking heavy blows at that moment. However, Harrison, who initially protested vociferously, gave Reiss the benefit of the doubt when he was interviewed.

“Jack is a championship referee,” said Harrison, who clearly was devastated after the fight. “I ain’t gonna question whatever he saw. I started to get a little lax and got caught. … [Charlo] earned it. I hate it. But he earned it.

“… I’d like to do it one more time,” he added, seemingly almost in tears. “I felt like I let us down. I felt like I let me down. Damn.”

Charlo was gracious afterward, or as gracious as he could be given the nasty pre-fight trash talk that resulted the controversial decision in the first fight and the fact Harrison had to postpone the rematch because of a nagging ankle injury.

Still, Charlo followed tradition by walking over to Harrison’s corner to congratulate him on a good fight.

“I’m a gentleman at the end of the day,” Charlo said. “I have a family to feed, so does he. May the best man win. I showed good sportsmanship. But at the end of the day, I don’t that dude – period.”

Charlo-Harrison III? The winner was asked whether he’d be willing to fight Harrison again and initially indicated that is open to the idea but then said, “I’m off to bigger and better things,” which doesn’t bode well for Harrison.

Charlo was also asked about Julian Williams, who holds two 154-pound titles.

He responded, including brother Jermall in his answer: “We’re history making twins. I’m down for whatever makes history.”

Deontay Wilder on Tyson Fury rematch: ‘This time, he ain’t getting up’

Deontay Wilder said he will be more patient in his rematch with rival Tyson Fury in February.

The rematch between Deontay Wilder and arch rival Tyson Fury is on for February 22, according to a report on ESPN.com. Wilder expects it to look at least somewhat different from the first fight.

“This time,” Wilder told The PBC Podcast , “he ain’t getting up.”

Wilder’s primary goal is to become the only heavyweight champion, which would require victories over Fury and the winner of the Dec. 7 rematch between Andy Ruiz Jr. and Anthony Joshua.

“My mindset is to get ready for the next one because I’m on a mission,” said Wilder, who stopped Luis Ortiz with one punch last Saturday. “Like I said, I want one champion, one face, one name. And I’m so close, closer than I’ve ever been. There are a couple of obstacles to get out of the way but I’m not worried. I’m ready to go, ready to live out my dreams and reach them.

“It’s been a big goal for me to be undisputed, unified heavyweight champion and I’m here. One more step to go. If everything goes as planned, you can finally see a unified champion in the heavyweight division.”

Of course, Fury is a significant obstacle. In their first fight, last December, they fought to a split-decision draw even though most observers thought Fury did enough to win.

In the most dramatic moment of the fight, Wilder put Fury flat on his back with an enormous right-left combination in the 12th and final round yet Fury was able to get up and hear the final bell.

Wilder believes Fury was down for the 10 count, which means referee Jack Reiss shouldn’t have allowed the fight to continue, but he also blamed himself for his lack of patience. He pushed too hard for the knockout.

That’s the past, though. He says he learned from that experience and will be better in February.

“I can’t wait,” Wilder said. “(Fury) showed me everything he’s going to be able to do. I don’t think there’s (anything) Fury can do at this point to improve. Even in the first fight, he had three training camps, he had two warmups, he had like four, five different trainers come to help him out.

“He gave me his all that night. For me, that wasn’t the best Deontay Wilder. … I rushed it. This time around, I’ll be even more patient. I’ll pick my shots. I know exactly what this man wants to do. Like I say, don’t blink. You don’t know what it’s coming, but when it does, good night.”

He added for good measure: “I’m going to knock him out again … but in more devastating fashion and quicker fashion. It will be good while it lasts.”