Beauty of match play on display at Gil Hanse’s Ohoopee

COBBTOWN, Ga. – In December the Presidents Cup was played at Royal Melbourne in Australia, giving golf fans a chance to see the game’s best compete on one of the game’s great courses. It also was a chance to experience the beauty of match play. …

COBBTOWN, Ga. – In December the Presidents Cup was played at Royal Melbourne in Australia, giving golf fans a chance to see the game’s best compete on one of the game’s great courses. It also was a chance to experience the beauty of match play. 

 “Match play is a completely different game. The focus shifts from beating the course to beating your opponent. Different dynamic,” Conrad Ray, Stanford’s director of men’s golf, told me recently.

Changing that dynamic makes the golf more personal. Match play adds layers of strategy and psychology to a round, and it brings out a wider range of emotions. All of it equals a heightened experience for players and fans alike.

Match play can yield thrilling and compelling golf on almost any stage (i.e. Hazeltine and Medinah), but the opportunity for excitement, creative shotmaking, risk-taking and disaster is far more likely at architectural masterpieces such as Royal Melbourne.

So what makes a great match play hole or course?

While that could be debated forever, the answer that seems to be consistent from players, caddies, designers and fans is options. 

Giving players options requires them to think and execute. When you add in the head-to-head element of match play, the thinking becomes more complex. Providing options also leads to more aggressive play. Knowing that making an 8 only costs you one hole shifts the risk vs. reward calculation for players.

Firm and fast conditions add to the intrigue. Giving players the choice to use the ground contours requires much greater thought as different clubs, trajectories and spins are factored in. Courses that are wider, play firm and fast, and feature strategic hazards offer the best match play venues. 

Former Aussie tour player and course designer Michael Clayton believes the 10th hole at Royal Melbourne West (No. 6 for the Presidents Cup) is a prime example. Players can lay up in the wide fairway or try to drive the green by carrying a deep bunker. High risk and high reward.

Royal Melbourne proved to be an epic Presidents Cup venue because it asks interesting questions and allows for players to answer in a variety of ways. It makes you wonder if it was specifically designed for match play? While we may never get a definitive answer to that question, we now know what such a course would look like if it were built today.

No. 5 at Ohoopee Match Club (Courtesy of Ohoopee Match Club)

More than 9,000 miles from Royal Melbourne in rural southeast Georgia sits the Ohoopee Match Club, a course that was specifically designed for match play.

The course in Cobbtown was developed by Michael Walrath, a New York businessman, and crafted by Gil Hanse, Jim Wagner and their crew of “Cavemen,” the amicable nickname given to the team’s shapers who handcraft features. Ohoopee opened in 2018 and already has garnered numerous awards and recognition.

The club sits on 3,000-plus acres of sand-based savannas and woodlands with the course radiating out from a collection of buildings overlooking a lake. Ohoopee offers first-class amenities and service but does so in a very casual and relaxed way. Spending a few days at OMC feels more like visiting family than it does a prestigious club. Music plays while players warm up on the range, a fire burns outside on the porch, guests toss bean bags while watching their friends finish on 18 and members serve as bartenders when the staff leaves for the night. Members and guests can stay in tastefully appointed cottages or in “the burrows” – what could be described as a trendy version of a wine cellar dorm. 

The course gently weaves through different landscapes in a way that you typically only see the hole you are on. The layout is comprised of 22 holes, which the club used to make two distinctly different courses for morning and afternoon play. The Whiskey Routing, played in the afternoon and featuring a community whiskey bottle, utilizes 14 of the holes from the championship course, but often at a different angle and shorter length. It also incorporates four alternate holes dubbed the A, B, C and D holes. 

What makes the design work so well for match play is the variety of the holes and the choices they provide the player. There is ample room off the tee, but usually an advantage can be seized from a particular spot. The firm and fast conditions require players to consider the ground contours that will help some shots nestle to the hole while rejecting others. 

Like Royal Melbourne, OMC asks interesting questions and allows players to answer them in different ways. 

Gil Hanse on Ohoopee

At a recent gathering of golf architects at Ohoopee Match Club, I sat down with Hanse and asked about the process of designing a course for match play.

JB: How did the concept of a match play course come about?

GH: It was Michael’s idea, Michael Walrath the owner. He had reached out to us about a different site, but that didn’t work very well for golf and we were familiar with this property and turned him onto the site.

Gil Hanse (Darren Carroll/Getty Images for the PGA of America)

JB: With match play as a design objective, what were some ideas that you thought about trying to incorporate into the design?

GH: The first thing that came to mind was the finishing stretch. How do we make it a compelling finish for matches? How do we sequence the golf holes to impact the way matches might be carried out? And then the thought process of more of a heroic school of architecture approach, where you’ve got a lot of big risk, big reward.

JB: Did your mindset change at all when it came to designing the holes or the features?

GH: Here we were able to build green complexes where occasionally we focused on a particular hole location. Normally we try to build greens that are based on slope and fit into their surroundings. Here we could do that, but also have a more acute focus on specific hole locations for a match and build green complexes around that. Giving players the choice to go big or go home depending on where they were in the match.

JB: How did the 22-hole course with morning and afternoon routing come about?

GH: We had a friend out walking when we were just getting started, and he felt the routing might be too long of a walk for 36 holes. So I started looking at ways for a shorter afternoon routing and originally thought about adding some par-3 holes after the first hole, and then we talked about adding some holes out at the far end into the prairie. Jim Wagner ultimately came up with the routing and how it actually works. 

PGA Tour players choose: Whom would they hire to design a golf course?

Credit must be given where credit is due. I was asking Davis Love III a question about golf course architecture as we cruised around the Sea Island Resort Plantation Course that he had just renovated and Love gave my question the Heisman stiff-arm. …

Credit must be given where credit is due.

I was asking Davis Love III a question about golf course architecture as we cruised around the Sea Island Resort Plantation Course that he had just renovated and Love gave my question the Heisman stiff-arm. He had a better question in mind.

“What you should really be asking guys is if you were going to build a golf course and start a club, who would you hire? Who would you pay to do the design work? I’d hire Ben Crenshaw,” he said. “I don’t mean that to offend my other friends in the industry, but I love his work. I’d want Ben Crenshaw with a little bit flatter greens.”

I hated to admit it but it didn’t take me long to realize that Love’s question was actually better than the one I proposed and had the potential for some very revealing answers. So, I took Love’s advice and the following answers reveal that PGA Tour pros have more of a reverence for the Golden Age designers than they are given credit for and that minimalist design and the latest trend of wide fairways, expanded greens and tree removal to create more strategic angles and options is in vogue among the play-for-pay ranks too.

Harris English was the first person to ask, “Can I pick a dead guy?” Why not? As a result, there are just as many Alister Mackenzie, Donald Ross and Seth Raynor selections as Coore-Crenshaw, Gil Hanse and Tom Doak.

Hey, Davis, this one’s for you.

Paul Azinger

“I would hire Gil Hanse. He has an incredible feel and sense of what is technically sound and visually pleasing. I love his personality and I think he’d be easy to work with.”

Aaron Baddeley

“I like Coore-Crenshaw. They don’t move too much dirt. They let the ground dictate the design.”

Zac Blair

“King-Collins, who did Sweetens Cove, because they are the best. We’re going to do The Buck Club (in Utah). Can’t wait.”

Scott Brown

“It depends on the land. If it’s an unbelievable canvas, I’d choose Coore-Crenshaw.”

Patrick Cantlay

“Alister Mackenzie would be my dead guy. Coore-Crenshaw among the living.”

The 224 yards par 3, 17th hole at the Castle Stuart Golf Links designed by Mark Parsinen and Gil Hanse in Inverness, Nairnshire, Scotland. (David Cannon/Getty Images)

Brandel Chamblee

“Gil Hanse because his golf courses strike every note. He doesn’t make them too hard or too easy, he just makes them interesting and beautiful. At least in my view, he captures the essence of what architecture is meant to be. Who is going to take a piece of property and give you an incredible array of holes with great elements of strategy and everything you’d ever want in a golf course, getting the most out of a piece of land in the most affable way? I’d probably go with Gil Hanse.”

Harris English

“Seth Raynor. He built fun courses that have stood the test of time.”

Tony Finau

“Alister MacKenzie. All his courses are the real deal.”

Rickie Fowler

“I’d want to be involved in the design because I enjoy golf course architecture. My favorite style is links golf. I love what Coore-Crenshaw are doing and having a duo where one of them has been a player makes for a great combo.”

Jim Furyk

“Coore-Crenshaw. All of their courses are fun to play.”

Links at Perry Cabin by Pete Dye
Links at Perry Cabin by Pete Dye.

Chesson Hadley

“Pete Dye. I’ve always played well on his courses.”

Morgan Hoffmann

“Pete Dye among the living and Donald Ross among the deceased. I grew up on a Ross course and I love them.”

Russell Knox

“Coore and Crenshaw have done a great job. It must be very difficult because there are very few courses that are spot on. All of us pros think we know more than we do, but every course there’s somewhere where I think, ‘What the hell were they thinking?’ I’d love to get into that world as the years go on. I like the new-school of make it wider and angles but at the same time there needs to be narrow holes too. There needs to be variety. That’s what makes Seminole (Golf Club in Juno Beach, Florida) great.”

Matt Kuchar

“Alister MacKenzie. I don’t think I’ve ever played one of his courses that I didn’t like.”

Jagged mountains and the Sea of Crotez line Tom Doak’s first course design in Mexico.

Peter Malnati

“Tom Doak. He’s a minimalist.”

Maverick McNealy

“Gil Hanse. I see his courses really well.”

Francesco Molinari

“Coore-Crenshaw. Their work at Pinehurst No. 2 was really good.”

Patrick Rodgers

“Gil Hanse. I feel like his philosophy is most in alignment with the origins of the game and making it fun.”

Adam Scott

“Coore-Crenshaw because I’ve never played a course they’ve designed that I didn’t like.”

Steve Stricker

“Alister MacKenzie. Pasatiempo was my favorite course I played in college, and I’ve been a MacKenzie fan ever since.”

Chris Stroud

“Seth Raynor. I love his unique design style.”

Bo Van Pelt

“Gil Hanse. He restored Southern Hills, where I play frequently, and did a great job.”