Gimmicks or not, some have ideas for a Thermal Club redux

If IndyCar and The Thermal Club choose to hold another $1 Million Challenge non-points all-star race, what kind of changes might the series consider to make the format more entertaining from start to finish? Andretti Global’s Colton Herta, Arrow …

If IndyCar and The Thermal Club choose to hold another $1 Million Challenge non-points all-star race, what kind of changes might the series consider to make the format more entertaining from start to finish? Andretti Global’s Colton Herta, Arrow McLaren team principal Gavin Ward and Meyer Shank Racing podium finisher Felix Rosenqvist shared the following with RACER after the inaugural event’s conclusion.

“Qualifying,” Herta said. “Standing start from pit out, single-car qualifying. Just see who can get around to the start/finish line the fastest. This is not my idea. [Team Penske president] Tim Cindric said this. And I agree; that sounds awesome. That’s fun.”

Herta has an idea which has roots in rallycross.

“Turn 1 to Turn 6, there’s a road that connects it. Joker lap,” he said with a big smile. “If we’re gonna do gimmicks, you might as well go all the way through the whole thing. So if you add more of these things, it might make the racing a lot better. Add more gimmicks and make it an awesome all-star attack race. The last thing would be push-to-pass with no response [from the following driver].”

Like Herta, Ward started with qualifying where IndyCar made a limited duration of push-to-pass available for the first time.

“I think for starters, with the qualifying format, if you’re gonna allow overtake to be used, having more than enough overtake so you can do more than one lap with overtake would have been nice,” he said.

Ward’s next topic was the race itself and the split 10-lap segments where drivers were limited to using the same set of tires — on a track where they dealt with extremely high tire degradation — that inspired the bottom half of the 12-car field to cruise at the back and save their tires during the opening stanza.

“I was definitely pretty happy with the performance of our cars, but it’s still pretty hard to make much progress in the race format,” he said. “Not being able to change to new tires at halftime really lent itself to a lot of people trying to save tires because you effectively knew you were gonna get paid back a bunch in the last 10 laps. We need to put some thought into how we can avoid that, because for the 10 laps to start the race, it was not terribly exciting.”

Only race winner Alex Palou was able to maintain a quick pace and prevent his tires from being rooted before the 20 laps were complete. Ward knows why.

“The track layout, to be honest, makes it so you’re going to destroy your tires by following people through high-speed corners due to the understeer it creates, so leading is probably the best tire-saving strategy,” he explained. “But if you’re at the back, there’s almost no penalty to driving slowly in the corners to save the tires for the last stint.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1408]

With the steep drop off in prize money after the $50,000 for fifth place, where sixth place through last earn the same $23,000 apiece, Ward provided the answer on why his lead driver on the day — Alexander Rossi, who placed seventh — didn’t go wild trying to improve one or two positions before the checkered flag.

“The thing is, you only incentivize racing in the top six because everyone else gets the same prize,” he said. “So down in seventh, poor Rossi was like, ‘Oh, we could be under pressure here from Newgarden (who ended up eighth),’ but we’re like, ‘Well, doesn’t matter.’”

Rosenqvist likes the idea of making the bisected 20-lap finale an all-skate.

“We all had an open mind going into it, but I thought, overall, it was successful,” he said after bringing $250,000 to MSR. “The biggest thing for me is all cars should race in the main race, There’s no real reason why we wouldn’t have all the cars out there. Maybe the heat race guys who transfer are the only ones who can go for the money, but I think it sucks for the guys who don’t make it (into the final 12). I think part of IndyCar is that you can go from the back to the front.

“Maybe everyone should be out there racing — I think maybe part of why people thought it was a bit stale. If you have more cars it’s more excitement, more variables and strategy. The push-to-pass stuff was pretty interesting — something to learn from for our real events as well. Maybe the Fast Six should have push-to-pass. I thought it was fun trying that kind of stuff; it was a fresh experience.”

One question raised by quite a few folks was why a live pit stop for refueling wasn’t used instead of the 10-minute halftime where they were topped up to be able to complete the last 10 laps. Asked if a pit stop and a new set of tires is something he’d be in favor of, Rosenqvist likes half of the concept.

“Even if the first part of the race was a bit boring,” he said. “I actually like that Colton, for example, had a massive charge in the second part of the race because he was like, ‘I’m just gonna scrap my first part of race and save tires.’ It’s easy to be ‘Captain Hindsight’ but I think actually it was pretty interesting that way with only the one set of tires. I do think pit stops are always a huge contributor to excitement.”

The Swede hopes to share his thoughts with the series on how a future all-star race, if it were held, might be improved.

“We’ll talk to IndyCar about it,” he said. “I think it’s really cool that they had the balls to do something like this.”

Mixed reactions after IndyCar’s split session format at St. Pete

IndyCar’s attempts to create more on-track action for fans and more free space for its drivers was met with some strong opinions on whether it should continue at other road and street courses. With the opening 75-minute session at the Firestone …

IndyCar’s attempts to create more on-track action for fans and more free space for its drivers was met with some strong opinions on whether it should continue at other road and street courses.

With the opening 75-minute session at the Firestone Grand Prix structured with a 20-minute window for all 27 drivers to lap the track before the field was split into alternating 10-minute sessions, the concept should have prevented the long periods of inactivity where teams have their drivers sit on pit lane and preserve sets of tires for select moments when the track is clear. The format change is only being trialed on Friday.

And with the series making one set of the faster green-banded Firestone alternate tires available for each car during the Friday session to perform qualifying simulation runs ahead of Saturday’s qualifying session, the Friday afternoon run was an important one for every driver.

But the random timing of red flags during some of those 10-minute blasts meant some drivers had limited or no time on the alternates, which will have a negative impact on the rest of their weekend.

Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing’s Pietro Fittipaldi, a first-timer at St. Petersburg, had positives to offer about the format that was tested.

“I think it was good because for me, especially while learning the track, there was less of the traffic and people on out laps slowing me down,” he told RACER. “So for me, it was much better. The idea of the session was to do as many laps as possible. … I haven’t experienced it here without it, so tomorrow’s session will tell me what it’s like with all the cars out there at the same time.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1408]

Arrow McLaren team principal Gavin Ward questioned the format’s need at anywhere other than the Chevrolet Grand Prix.

“I applaud us for trying something,” he said. “I think it’s only going [to be] worth doing at Detroit. What we suggested here was just to split into two groups and run two separate sessions. I think this was overcomplicated.”

Juncos Hollinger Racing co-owner Ricardo Juncos wasn’t a fan.

“I don’t like it much,” he said. “I think it’s a lot of stress. Right now, with the red flag, it hurst us with [driver Agustin] Canapino. We didn’t get a lot of time. We actually didn’t use the [Firestone] greens, so our lap times [are] pretty massively down. That’s the only chance for him before qualifying, so it screwed the whole thing.”

Ed Carpenter Racing’s Rinus VeeKay had a range of takes to offer.

“I wasn’t pleased with the first 10-minute run,” he said “The second one was nice. But on the other hand, because it went red twice, I barely got a second run. We just got a lot less running in than we usually do. So for me, it was okay, because I’ve been here [in an IndyCar]. I think for [rookie teammate] Christian [Rasmussen who hasn’t], I think it would be better without it because it hits the rookies pretty hard because they need all the laps.”

ECR lead engineer Matt Barnes also saw the pros and cons of the format.

“It’s hard to get everything done, but it’s nice to know you’re gonna have a 10-minute break,” he said. “But this all depends on [when] the reds fall. If you get your laps in, you’re probably happy, but if you didn’t, you’re probably not. I can say it was more smooth than I thought it would be.”

Arrow McLaren narrowing IndyCar alliance options

Arrow McLaren is getting closer to making a decision on where and how the three-car NTT IndyCar Series outfit will form strategic alliances in the paddock. Fellow Chevy-powered team Juncos Hollinger Racing is known to be a strong candidate to dress …

Arrow McLaren is getting closer to making a decision on where and how the three-car NTT IndyCar Series outfit will form strategic alliances in the paddock.

Fellow Chevy-powered team Juncos Hollinger Racing is known to be a strong candidate to dress one of its cars in papaya orange, but Arrow McLaren racing director Gavin Ward says there’s more than one team on their radar.

“We’re talking to a number of parties about strategic alliances,” Ward told RACER. “We’re pretty close to having something finalized that we will be in a position to announce in the coming weeks. But it’s not just one option on the table, and there are some options that might not even be mutually exclusive. We’re looking at a number of ways that we can make ourselves a better race team and really, that’s what we’re trying to do by building ourselves into the strongest IndyCar operation we can be.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1408]

Ward provided deeper insights into what a strategic alliance could represent for Arrow McLaren.

“We’re looking at some options that could be commercial, could be talent, whether it’s crews or drivers, trying to develop a pipeline,” he said. “Those are the kinds of strategic alliances we’re looking at.”

The potential to develop a technical alliance is also among the range of options for Arrow McLaren, but not for next season.

“We’re not ruling out technical partnerships of that ilk that seem to be out there right now like between Andretti [and Meyer Shank Racing] and Penske [and A.J. Foyt Racing] kind of relationships for the future, but we are really ruling that out for ’24,” Ward said.

“We’ve got enough to do on our own just to consolidate with the growth we’ve had in the team, and I don’t want to distract ourselves from just nailing it for next year as best we can. It’s flattering to have teams reach out and want technical support. It shows faith in what we’re doing and where we’re going.”