Washington sideline fight a focus on Monday morning

The former players reacted differently than those who didn’t play the game. That sideline altercation is in the past.

[mm-video type=playlist id=01eqbykgy681k112p8 player_id=none image=https://washingtonfootballwire.usatoday.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

As expected, the Monday morning sports shows each used a segment discussing the sideline altercation between Washington defensive tackles Jonathan Allen and Daron Payne.

ESPN’s First Take Ryan Clark, “No, it is not necessarily a big deal. I don’t look at this and say these two guys should be admonished for what they did. But you do have to be better than this. When you are getting your butts handed to you, the way the WFT was, don’t be fighting each other. Go fight (your opponent) on the field.”

Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio commented that he really thought the two might continue to argue and fight with each other on the field, seeing they lineup next to each other as defensive tackles.

Mike Golic added, “I have a feeling those two are going to be just fine because this stuff does happen, but it happens more often than not in the locker room. You have it, it is frustration, and then it is over and you move on.”

On ESPN’s Get Up, former NFL Defensive Coordinator and Head Coach Rex Ryan commented, “I like what they said that they are brothers and that is going to happen. But I still think they got some issues. They are going to have to get it resolved and sit down man-to-man…”

Coach Ron Rivera had revealed in the post-game press conference he was unaware it had even transpired until he was informed about it later. Rivera also added he had already talked to both of Allen and Payne. When asked what the players had said to him, he quickly asserted, “What my players say to me is really nobody’s business.”

ESPN analyst on Ben Roethlisberger: ‘Pittsburgh may have the fourth-best quarterback this year in the AFC North’

Former Jets GM says he’d rather see the ball in the hands of Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, or Joe Burrow instead of Ben Roethlisberger.

On Monday, former New York Jets general manager Mike Tannenbaum appeared on ESPN’s “Get Up” and proved why he’s no longer a GM when he offered his take on Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger.

“During the season, there will be a consequential play that Ben Roethlisberger is going to need to make, and because of all the money he’s made and all the championships he’s won, I would rather see the ball in the hands of Lamar Jackson, Baker Mayfield, or even Joe Burrow,” Tannenbaum said.

How does Big Ben having money and winning championships equate at all to Jackson, Mayfield and Burrow being better quarterbacks? There’s no logic there.

Tannenbaum continued, “And I’ve been around quarterbacks, Ben Roethlisberger at 38, who’s played two games in two years. I’ll take my chances with Burrow and Mayfield. And Pittsburgh may have the fourth-best quarterback this year in the AFC North.”

The years of only being an ESPN analyst and not working in the NFL must be flying by for Tannenbaum because — last I checked — two years ago, Roethlisberger was one of the best quarterbacks in the league. Yet Mike seems to think he’s only played two games out of 32.

This from the guy who drafted Mark Sanchez to be the future of the Jets. In the seven years that Tannenbaum was GM, the Jets went 57-55.

Tannenbaum was fired from the Jets in 2012; the same season that he traded fourth and sixth-round picks to the Denver Broncos for Tim Tebow. Most recently, he was executive vice president of football operations for the Miami Dolphins. Tannenbaum was let go after the 2018 season.

[vertical-gallery id=474626]

[lawrence-related id=474590]