Saints’ explanations for lack of fans at California practices don’t add up

The Saints are the only team closing their training camp to the public this summer, and it isn’t due to NFL rules. Mickey Loomis says he never bothered to check:

32 NFL teams are practicing at training camp on Wednesday, and 31 of them will have fans in attendance in some form or fashion. The New Orleans Saints are the only team that has totally closed its training camp to the public this summer. We’ve gotten a couple of different answers from team leadership on why that is, but their responses don’t add up to a cohesive statement.

Let’s start with Dennis Lauscha. The Saints team president was the first to answer the question when asked about it back in May, saying that as far as he was aware NFL marketing rules wouldn’t be a problem for having fans at training camp.

“I think that (rule) maybe pertains more to sponsorship,” Lauscha said during a recent press conference. “I can tell you we have a great relationship with the Rams and the Chargers, and that’s not an issue for us that I’m aware of. I think there is some plans (to have fans at training camp), I don’t know if it’s going to happen based on the layout (at UC Irvine) and what’s happening there.”

Fast-forward a few months and the Saints never got around to revealing those plans Lauscha hinted at. They did announce that they’ll hold two open practices at the Caesars Superdome and Yulman Stadium upon returning to New Orleans in August, but it’s not the same. When head coach Dennis Allen was asked about moving training camp to Los Angeles, he mainly focused on the weather and construction in Metairie rather than any fan considerations.

“Obviously, being away from home and away from our fans in New Orleans, obviously that’s the tough part about being out here in California for this training camp,” Allen answered. He acknowledged that moving camp to a new environment can help with a team-building culture, but ultimately the work in Metairie was what forced their hand. “But yet I don’t think you have to come out to California to change the culture.”

He continued: “Certainly the facility upgrades was going to be a challenge to hold a training camp with all the things that are going on. I mean we’ve got a fence in our indoor facility that makes it difficult to use the indoor. I looked at the forecast, I think it’s going to rain for the next month in New Orleans. So that would have made it even more challenging. All those things came together and led us to this.”

And then came Mickey Loomis, who most directly addressed the issue. He says the Saints decided early on that they wouldn’t be hosting fans at the UC Irvine practice fields:

“I think for us here, you know we’re away from our home market, we’re not expecting a lot of fans. We weren’t expecting a lot of fans. It’s just the venue, all the logistics that are involved. It’s significantly more logistics that are involved when you open it up to the public as to when you don’t. So all those factors came into play.

“I didn’t really do much inquiry about what we were allowed to do with fans or not allowed to do,” Loomis admitted during his opening press conference. “Because pretty quickly we determined that, hey, it’s going to be a limited amount of people at practice.”

That’s a wrongful assumption. It’s a couple of wrongful assumptions. Saints fans were so well-represented at joint practices with the Chargers in 2019 that they weren’t allowed to attend the next round of exercises in 2023. Sure, maybe only a couple hundred fans would be willing and able to make it to Saints training camp every day this summer — but Loomis couldn’t be bothered to make it happen.

The logistics he’s talking about, like paying for onsite security, medics, food and beverage vendors and other amenities, weren’t something Loomis was interested in. The Saints were valued at more than $4 billion last year and they’re currently paying north of $41.4 million in dead money for players not on their roster. But Loomis couldn’t find room in the budget for a couple of Los Angeles food trucks and some daytime security service, and maybe a standby ambulance if someone gets overheated?

The Las Vegas Raiders are under similar restrictions while holding camp in the area but at least they put the effort into compromising with the Rams and Chargers to bring in 140 to 200 fans (all season ticket holders who live in the Los Angeles area) per day. The Saints could have done something. Loomis acknowledged that he chose not to do anything for the team’s supporters in California or those who would have made the trip from further out.

And it’s not like UC Irvine can’t host a crowd. The Saints specifically chose this venue because the Rams have been using it for training camp for many years. The Rams estimated that almost 100,000 spectators visited their 10 open practices in the summer of 2022.

Even if the NFL’s marketing rules were a problem — which Lauscha says he didn’t know about, and which Loomis says he didn’t care about — and even if UC Irvine’s campus would have restricted attendance (which didn’t stop nearly 10,000 Rams fans from showing up every day), this all could have been avoided by not going there in the first place.

The Saints could have gone anywhere in America for training camp. And when they were deciding on that, their fans were not a priority. Mild weather in Southern California was the concern, not whether the people who invest in their team can make the trip. If Loomis, Lauscha, or Allen would just say that, at least you could respect the honesty. Instead it’s being spun as something that was mostly out of their hands, or far enough out of their hands to where they didn’t feel compelled to fight for it.

A lot of questions have been raised about the Saints’ quality of leadership inn their three-year playoff drought. Unforced errors like this one, alienating the team from its fanbase, suggest those leadership questions extend to the front office.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Saints’ California training camp practices will be closed to the public

The Saints’ California training camp practices will be closed to the public. This move out west has done a big disservice to their fans:

This is very disappointing. The New Orleans Saints won’t be opening their training camp practices at UC Irvine to the public, per NewOrleans.Football’s Nick Underhill. We expected this when every other team practicing in Southern California this summer announced plans for fans to attend their training camps, but there’s confirmation.

While the Saints aren’t fully to blame for this, they ultimately are at fault for taking their largest and most-accessible event out of Louisiana and sending it to the other end of the country. Because they’re holding camp in another NFL city, the Rams and Chargers would have had to sign off on allowing the Saints to promote themselves in the L.A. market. Previous comments from team president Dennis Lauscha suggested that wouldn’t be a problem, but it appears he was mistaken.

The Raiders are in a similar boat. They can’t open practices to the public, but they compromised with the Rams and Chargers by inviting several hundred Los Angeles-area season ticket holders to a limited number of their training camp dates. It’s a shame the Saints couldn’t even do that much, even if it’s unlikely many of their own season ticket holders live in L.A.

Which brings things full circle. If NFL rules prohibited this, someone in the front office should have known about it and said so sooner. The Saints should never have made plans to relocate training camp to Los Angeles in the first place. They could have gone anywhere in America and they chose to move camp somewhere that would be challenging for their home crowd to follow. Whether it’s Lauscha or general manager Mickey Loomis making that call, someone high up in the organization made a big mistake.

It’s not like they didn’t have options. They could have gone back to the Greenbrier in West Virginia or Millsaps College in Mississippi. They could have gone to St. Louis, San Diego, or another city with NFL ties and the means to support a team for a few weeks of practice. Instead they made this decision, and it was a bad call.

At a time when the Saints have failed to reach the playoffs for three years while being led by a head coach whose own players graded poorly, it’s a bad look. Instead of working to reach out to the community and reassure their supporters that things are trending up, giving fans an opportunity to watch practice and get autographs and make memories, everything is going to be fed to them secondhand by the few media outlets allowed to attend practice on the other side of the country.

The NFL rules are what they are, but ultimately Loomis and Lauscha and their staff should know better than to let them become a problem. Local fans who invest the most in their team will have to wait until the Saints return to New Orleans in August for two open practices at Tulane’s Yulman Stadium and the Caesars Superdome. It’s better than nothing, but fans still deserve more than what they’re being given.

[lawrence-auto-related count=5]

NFL Media podcast calls out Saints’ lack of plans for fans at California training camp

The long-running Around the NFL podcast called out the Saints’ lack of plans for fans at this summer’s California training camp:

The New Orleans Saints are moving their 2024 training camp to Irvine, California, and their plans for inviting fans to attend practices are still unclear. That ambiguity became a target for NFL Media’s long-running Around the NFL Podcast, where co-host Gregg Rosenthal criticized multiple parties for their approach to the topic.

The Saints are one of five teams holding camp in Southern California this summer, which is the home market of the Los Angeles Rams and Chargers. NFL marketing rules don’t allow teams to host fan events in competing markets, but while the Dallas Cowboys already have an arrangement and the Las Vegas Raiders are working on one, there hasn’t been much clarity on the topic out of New Orleans.

“The Saints aren’t really answering questions,” Rosenthal began. “And I just feel like going to a training camp is such an outstanding way to grow the support of your team and have young fans go there for nothing, just being around football, having training camps without fans doesn’t feel like training camp at all. And yes I know it’s the Saints in Southern California, how many people are really going to be showing up there every day, I’m sure people would be showing up.

“And so I hope they push to make that happen. I hope it’s not something where either the Rams and Chargers don’t allow it or the teams really don’t even want it, to me that’s not training camp. And if they do keep fans out, fans should let them know. You’re trying to grow your brand. The Raiders have done a great job over that, Saints, you’re trying to grow fans, don’t keep them out.”

One of Rosenthal’s co-hosts, Dan Hanzus, quoted from our article on Saints team president Dennis Lauscha saying that onsite logistics, not NFL marketing rules, were the bigger hurdle to inviting fans for camp this year. And that claim led to derision around the room.

Rosenthal replied: “Okay, I read that too, but I went to multiple great training camps (at UC Irvine) with the Rams. Like my kids had a blast the day they went, and that was the same facility, just saying. It was all happening.”

“With fans,” added co-host Colleen Wolfe, “And they had like food trucks and stuff out there.”

The Rams hosted fans for seven practices at UC Irvine’s campus last summer (and in several years preceding it), all free and open to the public. As is the case in New Orleans, and as Rosenthal noted, these are great opportunities for fans to meet their favorite players and cheer them on at little cost compared to expensive game tickets. The Rams estimated that almost 100,000 fans attended practice at UC Irvine in 2022, so there are clear blueprints for the Saints to work from. They just need to ask the Rams for some tips about where to park the food trucks and fence off the bleachers. Hopefully they’ll do the right thing and invite their West Coast fans out for at least a few days of practice.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Saints say logistics, not NFL rules, are a hurdle for inviting fans to training camp

Saints team president Dennis Lauscha said that onsite logistics at UC-Irvine, not NFL rules, are a bigger hurdle for inviting fans to their 2024 training camp:

The New Orleans Saints didn’t make a popular decision in moving their 2024 training camp to California, with operations traveling from Metairie to Irvine for weeks of practices this summer. And a report that NFL rules may prohibit the team from inviting fans to camp wasn’t welcomed warmly.

But Saints team president Dennis Lauscha explained that onsite logistics, not NFL marketing rules, are a bigger hurdle for the team. He believes that finding room for fans at UC-Irvine’s campus is going to be challenging.

“I think that (rule) may pertain more to sponsorship,” Lauscha said during a recent press conference. “I can tell you we have a great relationship with the Rams and Chargers, and that’s not an issue for us that I’m aware of.”

Finding room for thousands of fans in addition to a hundred or so players and nearly as many coaches, trainers, and other support staff is an undertaking in itself. But the Los Angeles Rams pulled it off in recent years, which is partly why the Saints were attracted to UC-Irvine itself. The school doesn’t have a football team but its 2,500-seat soccer stadium can host a decent crowd.

Still, it’s too soon to say whether Saints fans in California will be able to see their team in person. Lauscha continued: “I think there is some plans, I don’t know if it’s going to happen based on the layout and what’s happening there. And again we’re going to try to get back to New Orleans as quickly as we can. We’re also working right now on having offsite practices like we did a couple years ago. So we’re talking to a couple venues that would have us, that would welcome us, and hopefully we can use those facilities, too.”

The Saints are exploring opportunities to move some of their upcoming organized team activities (OTAs) and minicamp practices to local venues around New Orleans, so stay tuned for updates on that front. It isn’t the same as opening up training camp to local fans, but giving their strongest supporters the chance to, say, catch practice at Tulane’s Yulman Stadium or another accessible arena is a great gesture. Let’s see what the Saints have in store.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Saints plan on returning to New Orleans for their 2025 training camp

The Saints plan on returning to New Orleans for their 2025 training camp, with more amenities for fans attending practices in the works:

It’s safe to say the New Orleans Saints moving their 2024 training camp to California isn’t a very popular move. Taking one of the most accessible events for fans and sending it halfway across the country, where NFL rules may not even allow fans on the West Coast to attend practices, has drawn a lot of criticism.

Ongoing renovations to the team headquarters and the construction of a new cafeteria meant the Saints would be taking their training camp on the road this summer. But the plan is to be back for 2025 and beyond. Team president Dennis Lauscha addressed that during a Saturday press conference.

“No one wants to be back more, I can promise you, than Ms. Benson, Mickey (Loomis), myself,” Lauscha said. “We get it. We love having our fans there. It stinks when we don’t have our fans here. That’s kind of why we put off this construction as long as we did, to be perfectly honest with you. Because we were hoping there were perhaps a better way not to impact our training camp. But at some point you have to suck it up and you do it, and that’s where we are.”

Obviously there are lot of unknowns when you’re talking about things more than a year away. A severe weather event like a major hurricane could change the plans at the last minute. We just don’t know. We don’t even know if  Dennis Allen will be head coach or if Derek Carr will be the quarterback in 2025. But right now the plan is for the Saints to take training camp to California in 2024 before returning in 2025 with plenty of opportunities for fans to come out and support the team.

There are plans for more fan amenities in the works like permanent bleachers with shading and cooling areas to help manage the Louisiana summer heat and humidity. But that’s all part of the next phase after they complete renovations to the cafeteria and indoor practice facility, among other projects (with similar upgrades breaking ground next door at the New Orleans Pelicans’ base of operations). The Saints are making a ton of off-field investments to improve the fan experience. Hopefully their efforts on the field line up with it to give those fans something to cheer for.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

PFT: Saints feel too much blame is going on Dennis Allen and Derek Carr

PFT’s Mike Florio reports that Saints leadership feels too much blame is going on Dennis Allen and Derek Carr, the most important people in their organization:

The New Orleans Saints have been a tough team to watch this year. Another year of Dennis Allen at head coach with a $150 million quarterback next to him in Derek Carr has the team right back where they were at the end of last season: praying for help from other teams to get them to the playoffs.

Allen is knocking on the door of his first winning season in five years as a head coach, which wouldn’t be enough to get the team to the playoffs — where Derek Carr is still looking for his first career postseason win after a decade in the NFL. Changes may be on the way for the Saints if they can’t win the NFC South and get into the playoffs, but Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio reports that Allen and Carr are here to stay.

Florio shares that Saints leadership (meaning some combination of general manager Mickey Loomis, team president Dennis Lauscha, and owner Gayle Benson) don’t view Allen as “part of the problem in New Orleans.” Nor his quarterback. Florio adds that, “The feeling is that too much blame is being placed on Allen and quarterback Derek Carr for the team’s struggles in 2023, and that Allen and Carr could be key components of a resurgence in 2024.”

That’s laughable, but the Saints have not conducted themselves like a serious franchise since Drew Brees and Sean Payton left them to fend for themselves. Allen and Carr are the most important people in the organization. Everything rides on the franchise quarterback taking up so many salary cap resources. All of the decisions are on Allen’s plate, whose defense has fallen into inconsistency when he hasn’t been able to manage it personally.

Giving them both a mulligan and hoping for “some cultural tweaks” as Florio mentions is, well, ridiculous. The Saints had built a winning culture that demanded accountability of its best players during their franchise-best run from 2017 to 2020. When Allen took over, they’ve fallen into the same losing culture he installed with the Raiders a decade ago that Carr perpetuated after he was let go. Whether Allen is feuding with big egos on the team or Carr is barking at his teammates and coaches, it hasn’t been pretty. But more of the same appears to be Loomis and Lauscha’s vision for this team in 2024.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Report: Dennis Allen ‘is in a good spot’ after 14-18 start with Saints

NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reports that Dennis Allen ‘is in a good spot’ with the Saints despite his 14-18 start as their head coach. He isn’t on the hot seat:

There’s no rational explanation for the New Orleans Saints to stand by Dennis Allen as their head coach, but general manager Mickey Loomis and team president Dennis Lauscha appear to be manufacturing one anyway. All they have to show team owner Gayle Benson is another losing record after investing $150 million in quarterback Derek Carr to support Allen’s vision for the team. There are two games left to play against NFC South rivals that soundly beat Allen’s team earlier this season.

But change isn’t on the horizon, per NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport. Rapoport’s sources have found little to complain about Allen during his 14-18 run as Saints head coach through two years.

“My understanding is that Dennis Allen is in a good spot,” Rapoport said. “Obviously if it goes horrific at the end of the year, this is always subject to change, life is subject to change, but that is where it stands right now.”

This news come off the heels of the Saints’ inept performance in a Thursday night loss to the Los Angeles Rams. Both teams may have entered the game with matching 7-7 records, but the Rams left no doubt that they were the better team. The Saints didn’t lead on the scoreboard for a single minute in their 30-22 loss, which wasn’t as close as that final tally would imply.

So why stick by Allen? What does he bring to the table when his handcrafted defense is allowing a 95-yard touchdown drive? Rapoport’s explanation reeks of the sunk cost fallacy.

Rapoport continued, “One of the reasons is they’re not getting out of where they are any time soon. Derek Carr is fully guaranteed for next year. Could they move on, I don’t think they want to, it’s expensive if they decide to. You have a roster that’s getting a little older, getting a little slower, it’s still really expensive. Off the edge it’s not as fast or twitchy as you’d like.”

Loomis invested a ton of draft picks in Allen’s vision for the team, with little to show for it. He was fleeced in a trade with the Philadelphia Eagles aimed at getting left tackle Trevor Penning last year and Penning has hardly played since getting benched early this season. Loomis traded up for both of the Saints’ picks in the fourth round this year (offensive lineman Nick Saldiveri and quarterback Jake Haener), and those two players have combined for 18 snaps across 15 games.

The cupboard is looking awfully bare. With a complicated salary cap situation and few draft picks to spend on young talent, the Saints are stuck with the roster they’ve built for themselves — and for Allen. He got his quarterback, who hasn’t met expectations, and the defense he’s spent years cultivating is withering. So is there a light at the end of the tunnel if Allen and this group are returning for 2024?

“If they’re going to rebuild, they’re going to have to actually rebuild, and it just doesn’t feel like that’s something you do with a completely new coach,” Rapoport mused. “And you can’t do it next year basically anyway, so it does seem primed for a reboot in New Orleans.”

That’s not the most inspiring message, but it’s the reality the team is in. Rather than bring in a new coach with fresh ideas who can try to rally the group they have, they’re looking to ride it out with Allen and Carr through 2024 and then consider wholesale changes when it’s more affordable. That isn’t going to be a popular move with a fanbase that has already had its fill of Allen and Carr, but that’s the course Loomis and Lauscha must feel is best for their team. They’ve been wrong on almost every decision since hiring Allen so far. Maybe they’re due for getting something right.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

How long of a leash does Dennis Allen have with Saints ownership?

ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler thinks the Saints don’t want to make a change at head coach after the season, but Dennis Allen’s poor performance is hard to ignore:

Who is going to be coaching the New Orleans Saints in 2024? Could Dennis Allen return after struggling to reach (much less hold on to) a winning record in either of his two years as their head coach?

That’s no sure thing, but some recent scuttlebutt suggests the Saints are at least hesitant to consider making a move from Allen just yet. The latest buzz comes from ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler, who shared what he’s hearing in a back-and-forth with his colleague Dan Graziano:

“I don’t think the Saints want to make a change on Dennis Allen, but another losing season would mark two in a row, which wasn’t the norm in the Sean Payton era (though he did have a stretch of three consecutive 7-9 seasons from 2014 to ’16). It still needs to be seen how much grace New Orleans’ front office and ownership is willing to apply.”

Honestly, it’s odd that the situations would be compared; Payton earned his goodwill with a Super Bowl XLIV championship and a record-setting run with Drew Brees, helping the quarterback not just reinvent himself after a career-threatening injury but build a Hall of Fame resume.

Allen fixed Rob Ryan’s mess of a defense, which was no mean feat. Then he developed it into an elite unit. That was enough to give general manager Mickey Loomis and team president Dennis Lauscha the confidence to back Gayle Benson’s decision to hire him despite his historically poor run as a head coach a decade earlier with the Raiders. But when you look at the Saints’ fortunes since Allen was promoted to head coach, there’s little logic behind sticking with him.

An admittedly injury-ridden Saints team limped out of their Week 14 bye last year with a 4-9 record. They gave Allen free rein to recruit Derek Carr, investing $60 million guaranteed in a passer whose last team ditched him and whose free agency experience was lukewarm at best. What does Allen have to show for it a year later? The Saints are coming out of Week 14 with a 6-7 record. They’ve improved by just two wins.

There’s no valid reason to stick with Allen. His defense — his defense, the unit he’s drafted and developed and filled with veteran free agents — is eroding by the week. What was supposed to be the strength of the team has allowed the seventh-most rushing yards and tied for the third-fewest sacks in the NFL this season. They can’t stop the run or rush the passer. Allen’s offense still can’t score points between Carr panicking in the red zone and rookie kicker Blake Grupe shanking 29-yard field goals. Visiting fans are taking over the lower bowl in the Caesars Superdome, and Carr is being met with boos whenever he jogs off the field after another stalled-out drive. The team is in a bad place even after a lopsided (yet unconvincing) win over a division rival last Sunday.

So we’ve got two reasons for the Saints to keep Allen. In the first scenario, they’ll outlast their rivals in the NFC South and win the division to host a home playoff game (likely against a Super Bowl contender like the Dallas Cowboys), which likely won’t go well. It’ll also drop their first-round pick in the 2024 NFL draft away from the best prospects, which could be devastating when bad trades from Loomis cost them their second-, third- and fourth-round picks. But, Loomis can say, they did reach the postseason after falling short last year. And that’s tangible progress.

What if the Saints miss the playoffs and still keep Allen? That’s when the excuses might start rushing out: injuries to star players like Michael Thomas and Marshon Lattimore (just like last year) plus Carr, who is valiantly playing through a sprained throwing shoulder, three injured ribs and two concussions. That’s an easy way to wave off his poor performance this season.

The rebuttal to that is the Saints having the healthiest roster in the league through the first 10 weeks and still idling at 5-5 before the injuries hit. But if the team leadership group has seen Allen’s team get worse by the week and find new ways to lose football games into mid-December, odds are strong that Benson, Loomis and Lauscha aren’t going to acknowledge that criticism in January. It would take something drastic to convince them that hiring Allen and committing harder to his vision for the team was the wrong move.

Allen is two years into his four-year contract. Carr’s heaviest guarantees extend into 2024. Maybe the plan all along has been to give Allen those two years with his quarterback and see if he can make something happen before kickstarting a reboot in 2025 (maybe without Loomis, the longest-tenured general manager in the NFL) once the salary cap has skyrocketed to wipe out years of financial maneuvering and cost deferments. All fans can do is stand by, see how this all plays out, and hope the team gives them a product worth cheering for.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Dennis Allen’s 5-7 record is the best he’s ever had after Week 13

Dennis Allen’s 5-7 record is the best he’s ever had after Week 13. The Saints must acknowledge that this is his ceiling and take meaningful action, but will they?

The latest New Orleans Saints losing streak extended to three games after the black and gold fell short to the Detroit Lions. It’s disappointing, but not surprising: this is what a Dennis Allen-led team looks like. The Saints’ 5-7 record is the best Allen has ever had after Week 13 in his five years as an NFL head coach.

Look at his resume. The Saints were 4-9 at this point last season. Allen went 3-9 and 4-8 in his first two years with the Raiders, who dismissed him before he could reach this point in his third season. Five wins in a dozen games is the ceiling for what Allen is capable of.

So much of that is due to an underperforming offense, but Allen has to take the blame for that. He made the decision to go get Derek Carr as his quarterback. He wasn’t able to recruit an upgrade at play caller and believed Pete Carmichael could get the job done. That hasn’t been the case. This year’s offense is not appreciably better than the product the Saints rolled out last year.

And Allen’s defense, the reason he was promoted to this job, has fallen off. They can’t stop the run or pressure the quarterback. It’s a unit relying on too many aging veterans without enough up-and-coming young players ready to sustain success. They’ve lost defenders who were drafted and developed year after year, replacing them with subpar free agent pickups. Allen hasn’t accomplished what he was trusted to do.

So where does that leave the Saints? It’s never easy to fire a coach midseason, and it’s not something they’ve done in decades, not since the Tom Benson bought the team. Odds are Allen will remain in position for these last five games. If the Saints keep fighting (and they will), there’s a good chance general manager Mickey Loomis and team president Dennis Lauscha will make excuses for him and bring Allen back for 2024 to ride out the second year of Carr’s contract, which was already guaranteed against the salary cap when he signed it.

That isn’t what they should do, though. If the Saints were committed to long-term success they’d pull the plug on this experiment now. It’s beyond clear that Allen won’t take them where they want to go. What they should do is thank him for what he’s done in the past, show him the door so he can get a jump on job hunting in the next hiring cycle, and focus on what’s next: locking in a top-10 draft pick (if not top-5) to spend on a real quarterback to lure a new coach who can run an offense in the spring.

But don’t count on it. The efforts of proud veterans and the still-weak schedule left this season mean the Saints aren’t about to go in a new direction. They would rather project patience and stability than take action to give fans something to cheer about. It’s going to take more than a close loss to a better team (coached by a popular former Saints assistant they let get away…) to spur Loomis, Lauscha, and team owner Gayle Benson into changing course now.

[lawrence-auto-related count=4]

Saints among teams that voted against Thursday night flex scheduling

The Saints are among the teams that voted against Thursday night flex scheduling at spring NFL owners meetings:

The New Orleans Saints are among the teams that voted against Thursday night flex scheduling at spring NFL owners meetings, as first reported by NBC Sports’ Peter King. Notably, Saints owner Gayle Benson was not in attendance, having instead made the trip to New York City for NBA Board of Governors meetings to fulfill her responsibilities as owner of the New Orleans Pelicans.

Maybe Benson will vote differently than team president Dennis Lauscha did (as her representative) when NFL owners regroup for another roundtable in May, but it’s more likely they are both on the same page here. The Saints could have chosen to abstain altogether, as the Carolina Panthers and Denver Broncos did, but they decided to vote against the proposal outright. NFL bylaws needed 24 votes for the Thursday night flex scheduling rules change to pass, but it came up short.

It’s been a divisive topic. Thursday night games haven’t done as well with ratings as traditional Sunday and Monday night prime-time games, so from that perspective moving better matchups into that time slot makes sense. But it asks a lot of the players and coaches to switch up their preparation schedule even on two weeks’ notice — to say nothing of the tens of thousands of fans who have to make expensive travel arrangements in the event of a flex. We’ll see if this passes eventually or if there’s enough opposition to shelve it altogether.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3]

[stnvideo key=”nLxGTzs5OT-2653658-7618″ type=”float”]