Washington 27, Texas 20 Valero Alamo Bowl What Happened, What It All Means

Washington 27, Texas 20: Valero Alamo Bowl what happened, player of the game, and what it all means

Washington beat Texas 27-20 to win the Valero Alamo Bowl. What happened, who was the player of the game, and what does it all mean?


Washington 27, Texas 20 Valero Alamo Bowl What Happened, Player of the Game, What It All Means

[mm-video type=playlist id=01f1343a1wt7q817p7 player_id=none image=https://collegefootballnews.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

Valero Alamo Bowl What Happened

Michael Penix Jr. threw two touchdown passes in the second half, Wayne Taulapapa ran for a 42-yard score in the first quarter, and Washington took a 27-10 lead midway through the fourth quarter. Texas struggled to get the offense going, but it was able to pull within seven after scoring ten unanswered points. The final Longhorn drive stalled at midfield on a long pass.

Helped by that long bomb that ran out the clock, Texas QB Quinn Ewers finished with 369 yards with a touchdown pass to Jonathon Brooks, but too many drives stalled. There were a few crisp scoring marches, but two ended in field goals and there wasn’t enough consistency.

Fourth downs mattered. Washington is always pushing the ball deep, but Penix Jr. was able to come through on some of the shorter plays. too. He and the Huskies were good at keeping the chains moving – going 2-of-3 on fourth downs – and Texas was also able to connect on two fourth down tries. Washington was able to do more with its conversions.

100 Best Bowl Players | Ranking How Good the Bowls Were

Valero Alamo Bowl Player of the Game

Bralen Trice, DE Washington 
The offensive parts for Washington were great, but Trice headed a terrific effort for the much-maligned defense with a team-tying six tackles with two sacks.

CFN Experts Picks CFP NY6, Dec 28-Jan 2

Valero Alamo Bowl Fun Stats

– Michael Penix Jr. completed 32-of-54 passes for 287 yards and two touchdowns with a pick. Wayne Taulapapa ran 14 times for 108 yards and a score.

– Texas QB Quinn Ewers completed 31-of-47 passes for 369 yards and a touchdowns. He was plagued by a slew of drops.

– Third down conversions: Washington 11-of-20 – Texas 6-of-15. Washington held the ball for almost 36 minutes.

Valero Alamo Bowl What It All Means

For all of the good things Texas was able to do, and even though it closed the regular season winning three of its last four games, it was bowl loss in what was essentially a home game.

After failing to get to a bowl last year, this was the chance for a reset. Steve Sarkisian was going to get a being win, the program was going to go into 2023 with a ton of momentum, and instead, Washington had the bombs away attack and fun offense Texas was supposed to.

With this loss, the streak of four straight bowl wins is broken – it was the first loss since 2014 – and Sarkisian is now 2-3 in bowls. He was 1-2 as the head man at Washington.

Of course it would’ve been nice if Washington didn’t gack away a loss to Arizona State and could’ve played in the Pac-12 Championship with a College Football Playoff berth on the line, but going 11-2 with an Alamo Bowl win over Texas is a really, really nice first year run under head coach Kalen DeBoer.

It’s the first season with 11 or more wins since Chris Petersen took the Huskies to the College Football Playoff in 2016, and it helped the overall bowl run. It’s the first bowl appearance since winning the 2019 Las Vegas, and now the program is 2-3 in these since 2015.

Even bigger, Washington knows just how good it can be under this head coach in this offense. This might be just the beginning.

[protected-iframe id=”361699434b6d70baf15f631ed2408ac1-97672683-92922408″ info=”https://www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js” ]

2022-2023 Bowl Schedule, Predictions

Ron Rivera appears unaware that Commanders could be eliminated from playoffs today

Ron Rivera seemed surprised that his Washington Commanders could be eliminated from the postseason today. We can only hope that he was joking.

Perhaps this was what went into the Washington Commanders’ decision to stay with quarterback Carson Wentz all the way through their eventual 24-10 loss, despite Wentz doing everything he possibly could to hand the game to the Browns with his three interceptions — and almost a fourth near the end of the game. Perhaps this is why head coach Ron Rivera thought better of replacing Wentz with former starter Taylor Heinicke, who was benched last week against the 49ers in favor of Wentz, even after it was clear that Wentz just didn’t have it out there. Heck, put rookie Sam Howell in there, to try and stop the bleeding.

Carson Wentz is doing Carson Wentz things, and Commanders fans aren’t happy

Perhaps Rivera wasn’t aware that the Commanders could be eliminated from the postseason today if the Green Bay Packers beat the Minnesota Vikings.

That’s certainly what it looked like after the loss.

If the Packers do beat the Vikings, and Rivera really was giving Wentz all that leash thinking that it wouldn’t possibly bump his team out of the postseason… well, that’s about as unforgivable a mistake as a head coach can make.

We can only hope that Rivera was expressing some sort of sarcasm with such an obvious and egregious miss.

What’s the verdict on Major Tuddy, Commanders’ new mascot?

The Commanders have revealed a new mascot, Major Tuddy

The Washington Commanders’ organization needs to do anything and everything to try and find some good publicity.

The Commanders waited until Week 17 of the regular season to share a new mascot with their fans.

Welcome to the NFL, Major Tuddy, kind of a pig deal, says the social media team for the Commanders.

Major Tuddy going to stick or is he/she another major dud? Will Major Tuddy wind up, um, hogging the spotlight?

Some of the original Hogs were present for the debut.

Carson Wentz is doing Carson Wentz things, and Commanders fans aren’t happy

Carson Wentz has forwarded his career as a double agent by completing two passes to his own receivers… and two passes to the Cleveland Browns.

The Washington Commanders came into Sunday’s game against the Cleveland Browns knowing that if they won, the Seattle Seahawks lost to the New York Jets, the Detroit Lions lost to the Chicago Bears, and the Green Bay Packers lost to or tied with the Minnesota Vikings, they’d be in the playoffs for the first time since 2020. The team had rebounded from a 1-4 start to a 7-7-1 mark, and though they’d lost their last two games, it was an interesting decision for head coach Ron Rivera to announce that Carson Wentz would replace Taylor Heinicke in this game.

Wentz played in relief of Heinicke in last week’s loss to the San Francisco 49ers’ top defense and did pretty well, but given the gravity of this game, and given Wentz’s history as a double agent making throws for both teams in a game… well, let’s just say that people were a bit confused.

People are more confused now after a first quarter in which Wentz completed two passes to his own receivers… and two to the Browns.

The result? Commanders fans would like their Heinicke back, please.

As long as the Commanders want Wentz in that (or any) game, they’ll have to balance his capacity for explosive plays and plays in which things just explode. Right now, the balance is severely off.

Texas vs Washington Valero Alamo Bowl Prediction Game Preview

Texas vs Washington game preview, prediction, and breakdown for the Valero Alamo Bowl on Thursday, December 29

Texas vs Washington prediction, game preview, odds, how to watch. Valero Alamo Bowl, Thursday, December 29


Texas vs Washington Valero Alamo Bowl Prediction Game Preview

[mm-video type=playlist id=01f1343a1wt7q817p7 player_id=none image=https://collegefootballnews.com/wp-content/plugins/mm-video/images/playlist-icon.png]

Contact/Follow @ColFootballNews & @PeteFiutak

Texas vs Washington How To Watch

Date: Thursday, December 29
Game Time: 9:00 pm ET
Venue: Alamodome, San Antonio, TX
How To Watch: ESPN
Record: Texas (8-4), Washington (10-2)
Sign up and live stream college football on ESPN+

Texas vs Washington Valero Alamo Bowl 5 Things To Know

Valero Alamo Bowl Prediction, What’s Going To Happen, History

You never know when it comes to these bowl games what kind of mayhem you’re going to get, but for all intents and purposes, Texas has to use this to set the tone for a potentially monstrous 2023. There are still plenty of great players in place, but it’s missing superstar RB Bijan Robinson and, potentially, a slew of important players on the defensive front.

The team was good late winning three of its last four, but the O stalled against TCU and couldn’t get by Oklahoma State before the finishing kick. It was able to crank up the ground game in the win over eventual Big 12 Champion Kansas State, but Mr. Robinson had something to do with that.

– Texas lost its main guy in Robinson, but QB Quinn Ewers is rolling. So is Washington QB Michael Penix Jr., who announced he’s coming back next year – this is when the 2023 Heisman campaign starts.

The Huskies closed out with six straight wins after losing back-to-back road games against UCLA and Arizona State. The offense caught fire, the defense held up just enough to to get by, and overall it was a fantastic first season under head coach Kalen DeBoer.

This is Washington’s first bowl appearance in a few years, beating Boise State in a blowout to close out the Chris Petersen era in the 2019 Las Vegas Bowl. Before that it lost three straight bowls and was an ugly 5-13 since getting past Michigan in the 1992 Rose. On the other side …

Texas has been a bowl game monster. It’s the first appearance since the Tom Herman era – his teams went 4-0 in bowls highlighted by a Sugar Bowl stunner over Georgia. Helped by the great run under Mack Brown, Texas has won 13 of its last 17 bowls since pulling off the 2001 Holiday over … Washington.

This makes it three appearances in four years in the Alamo for Texas – it beat a strong Utah team in 2019 and whacked Colorado in 2020. Now it’s up to Washington and the Pac-12 to finally stand up to the Big 12. Overall the Alamo has been a dud over the last three seasons, but it was strong before that with four games decided by five points or fewer.

Washington State beat Iowa State 28-26 in the 2018 version. Other than that, the Big 12 is 6-1 in the last seven vs the Big 12, and 9-3 since the two conferences took over the bowl tie-ins in the 2009 season.

CFN Experts Picks CFP, NY6, Dec 28-Jan 2

Why Texas Will Win The Valero Alamo Bowl

The passing game will still work.

It’s Texas, so there are still running backs to rotate into the rushing mix behind a decent offensive line, but it’s not going to get nearly the same production without Bijan Robinson carrying the mail.

However, QB Quinn Ewers is still special, and so is future NFL starting WR Xavier Worthy – he’s still a year away from being eligible – going against a pass defense that was the least efficient in the Pac-12 and allowed 242 yards per game.

Washington brings the pass rush, but as long as Ewers can get into a groove, the offense can move just fine.

The Husky defense doesn’t take the ball away and doesn’t generate enough big plays, but it can get pounded on, too. The Texas passing attack takes center stage, and Robinson might not be there, but the ground game has to try. UW is 2-2 when allowing 150 rushing yards or more.

The Longhorns have to control the tempo, but …

Top 100 Bowl Players | Ranking Bowl Games So Far

Why Washington Will Win The Valero Alamo Bowl

Here comes the high-flying Washington offense that leads the nation in passing and third down conversions.

Texas lost both times it allowed 330 passing yards or more, and that’s par for the course for Penix Jr. and the Husky attack. It only failed to get to 330 passing yards four times, and it made up for it in three of them by running well.

Texas can be run on – it’s 1-4 when allowing 140 yards or more, and Washington is 4-0 when it gets to that mark – it’s going to get physical when it can.

The offense turned it over multiple times just twice – in the loss to UCLA and the win over Washington State. Washington isn’t going to beat itself, and Texas doesn’t force takeaways. To pull this off, Ewers and the Longhorns will have to keep pressing.

Again, Washington has a pass rush to at least be disruptive, but …

Valero Alamo Bowl Prediction, What’s Going To Happen, History

NEXT: What’s Going To Happen, Texas vs Washington Prediction, Valero Alamo Bowl History

NFL admits missed crucial pass interference call in Giants-Commanders game

The NFL admitted that referee John Hussey should have called pass interference at a crucial point in the Giants-Commanders game.

With 56 seconds left in Sunday night’s game between the Washington Commanders and the New York Giants, Washington had fourth-and-goal at the New York six-yard line. After a scramble, quarterback Taylor Heinicke threw incomplete to receiver Curtis Samuel. The reason the pass was incomplete is that Giants cornerback Darnay Holmes was draped all over Samuel throughout the play. But there was no flag from referee John Hussey and his crew.

Because the pass was incomplete, the Giants had the ball to end the game, a 20-12 win in their favor. Pass interference would have given the Commanders another chance for a potential game-tying touchdown and two-point conversion.

“Pass interference is a judgment call,” Hussey told pool reporter Nicki Jhabvala of the Washington Post. “To the officials, it didn’t rise to what they felt was a restriction, thus they didn’t call it. That’s basically the bottom line there. It’s a judgment call and they didn’t believe it was pass interference.”

But per Ian Rapoport and Tom Pelissero of the NFL Network, the league told the Commanders that pass interference should have been called on Holmes. Which matches up with anybody who saw the play in real time could have said in real time — except for Hussey and his crew.

“It’s clearly a foul,” NBC rules analyst and former NFL official Terry McAulay said right after the game. “Grabs his arm, plays through the back, it’s clearly before the ball gets there. This is defensive pass interference, and it really should be called whether it’s the end of the game, beginning of the game, doesn’t matter. It’s always a foul. It should have been called… if it’s a foul in the first minute of the game, it’s a foul in the last minute of the game. When it’s that obvious, it has to be called.”

Hussey and his crew made several questionable calls against both teams in the game. But that drive seemed to get quite a bit up the Commanders’ collective nose, and for good reason.

With 1:03 left in the game, a rushing touchdown by Brian Robinson was negated by an illegal formation penalty on receiver Terry McLaurin. McAulay said that he wouldn’t have called that one. It looked as if McLaurin checked with line judge Carl Johnson to make sure he was on the line of scrimmage, to no avail.

“That’s just too technical,” McAulay said. “We watch the wide receivers… they’re in the vicinity… technically, he’s off the line, but it’s just too technical. Especially without warning, it shouldn’t have been called.”

Hussey saw it differently… or, to be more specific, he didn’t see it at all.

“Well, I didn’t see any of that, because I’m in the backfield,” Hussey said.. “What I was told and what has been confirmed is that the ball was snapped at the half-yard line, and he was lined up a yard back at the one-and-a-half-yard line. In order to be deemed legal he needs to break the belt line, the waist of the center, and he was not breaking the waistline of the center. That’s why the penalty was called, because he was not in a legal formation.”

When asked whether Johnson was obligated to tell McLaurin whether he was at the line of scrimmage or not, Hussey said this:

“Not typically, and the official could be doing other things, like counting the offense – there’s a multitude of different duties. So, I can’t confirm whether the official even saw that or not, but he was clearly off the line of scrimmage.”

The win put the Giants at 8-5-1, with an 89% chance of making the playoffs. Washington is now 7-6-1, and as a result of that loss, their playoff odds have slipped to 25.5%.

[mm-video type=video id=01gmrbej0qrama23hzr3 playlist_id=none player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01gmrbej0qrama23hzr3/01gmrbej0qrama23hzr3-312cbb47a89097235d6037b018de8045.jpg]

4-Down Territory: Bad officiating, dumbest plays, Jalen Hurts — system QB? (no), Vikings’ greatness

In this week’s 4-Down Territory, Doug Farrar and Luke Easterling discuss bad officiating, really dumb plays, whether Jalen Hurts is a “system QB,” and the Vikings.

Every week in “4-Down Territory,” Touchdown Wire’s Doug Farrar and Luke Easterling of Bucs Wire and Draft Wire go over the things you need to know about, and the things you need to watch, in the NFL right now. With Week 15 of the 2022 NFL season in the books, there was a lot to cover!

This week, Doug and Luke discuss:

  1. 00:00 – How should the NFL solve the officiating blunders?
  2. 06:00 – What is the dumbest play you’ve ever seen at any level of football?
  3. 10:02 – Is Jalen Hurts a system quarterback and easily replaceable?
  4. 15:00 – Is there anything about this win that makes you believe more in the now 11-3 Vikings?

You can watch this week’s episode of “4-Down Territory” right here:

[mm-video type=video id=01gmra98dmprabk3yf7c playlist_id=none player_id=01eqbvhghtkmz2182d image=https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/upload/video/thumbnail/mmplus/01gmra98dmprabk3yf7c/01gmra98dmprabk3yf7c-4dd823256d29d5c7136843f6918cb6b3.jpg]

The worst officiating moments from a NFL Week 15 that was full of them

Week 15 in the NFL has been full of awful officiating decisions. Here are the three games that were most affected by those mistakes.

Perhaps the NFL’s officials were confused by the fact that there were games on Saturday and Sunday in Week 15. Perhaps the NFL’s officials were thinking about the last-minute things on their holiday shopping lists. Or maybe it was just late-season exhaustion. Whatever it was, there were a lot of really bad calls in the NFL’s Week 15, and that’s in a season where there have been a lot to date.

Bad officiating is especially notable in the 2022 season, and Week 15 really stood out. Here’s why it’s a problem. Through Sunday’s games, there have been an NFL-record 101 games decided by a touchdown or less.

Per NFL Research, 14 of 15 games that have been completed in Week 15 have been within one score (eight points) in the fourth quarter and there have been 171 games within one score (eight points) in the fourth quarter this season, the most such games through the first 15 weeks in NFL history.

More than ever, the NFL’s idea of competitive balance has come true, but also more than ever, the NFL’s purported idea of officiating competence has been exposed as perhaps an unreachable goal.

Clearly, changes need to be made in the offseason, but before we get into that, let’s review the three games in which the most bad calls happened, and how those calls affected the final result.

Obvious missed pass interference call secures Sunday night win for Giants

More officiating hijinks! Referee John Hussey and his crew got a couple things wrong to the Giants’ benefit over the Commanders.

You’re probably as sick of hearing about bad officiating as we are sick of writing about it. Today, there was already the phantom touchdown pass from Derek Carr to Keelan Cole… and then, on Sunday night, there was the way the game between the New York Giants and the Washington Commanders ended.

With 56 seconds left, the Commanders had fourth-and-goal from the New York six-yard line. After a scramble, quarterback Taylor Heinicke threw incomplete to receiver Curtis Samuel. The reason the pass was incomplete is that Giants cornerback Darnay Holmes was draped all over Samuel throughout the play. But there was no flag from referee John Hussey and his crew.

“Pass interference is a judgment call,” Hussey told pool reporter Nicki Jhabvala of the Washington Post. “To the officials, it didn’t rise to what they felt was a restriction, thus they didn’t call it. That’s basically the bottom line there. It’s a judgment call and they didn’t believe it was pass interference.”

Fascinating that Hussey mentioned “the officials” as if he wasn’t one of them, but whatever.

After two kneeldowns by Giants quarterback Daniel Jones, the game was over, and the Giants won, 20-12.

“It’s clearly a foul,” NBC rules analyst and former NFL official Terry McAulay said right after the game. “Grabs his arm, plays through the back, it’s clearly before the ball gets there. This is defensive pass interference, and it really should be called whether it’s the end of the game, beginning of the game, doesn’t matter. It’s always a foul. It should have been called… if it’s a foul in the first minute of the game, it’s a foul in the last minute of the game. When it’s that obvious, it has to be called.”

McAulay then dove into the touchdown scored by Washington running back Brian Robinson with 1:03 left in the game, that was negated by an illegal formation penalty on receiver Terry McLaurin. McAulay said that he wouldn’t have called that one. It looked as if McLaurin checked with line judge Carl Johnson to make sure he was on the line of scrimmage, to no avail.

“That’s just too technical,” McAulay said. “We watch the wide receivers… they’re in the vicinity… technically, he’s off the line, but it’s just too technical. Especially without warning, it shouldn’t have been called.”

Hussey saw it differently… or, to be more specific, he didn’t see it at all.

“Well, I didn’t see any of that, because I’m in the backfield,” Hussey said.. “What I was told and what has been confirmed is that the ball was snapped at the half-yard line, and he was lined up a yard back at the one-and-a-half-yard line. In order to be deemed legal he needs to break the belt line, the waist of the center, and he was not breaking the waistline of the center. That’s why the penalty was called, because he was not in a legal formation.”

When asked whether Johnson was obligated to tell McLaurin whether he was at the line of scrimmage or not, Hussey said this:

“Not typically, and the official could be doing other things, like counting the offense – there’s a multitude of different duties. So, I can’t confirm whether the official even saw that or not, but he was clearly off the line of scrimmage.”

Washington head coach Ron Rivera wasn’t happy about that call at all, as you might expect.

Rivera was then asked about the no-call on Holmes, and the veteran coach knew that anything he said about it could and would be used against him when it came time to levy fines.

Especially late in the season, when so many games are so close, and these missed calls can affect games to such a degree, it behooves the officials to get things right as often as possible. It seems that we’ve been saying that more this season than in recent years.

Jerry Jones: ‘Biased,’ ‘stupid’ Dan Snyder investigation wouldn’t happen if Republicans ran House of Representatives

Jerry Jones, the NFL’s most prominent owner, blasted the House Committee on Oversight and Reform’s ‘stupid’ report on Commanders owner Dan Snyder.

On Thursday morning, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform released a 79-page report revealing its findings in the 14-month investigation of Washington Redskins/Football Team/Commanders owner Daniel Snyder, and the toxic workplace environment Snyder was accused of facilitating.

The report was incendiary in multiple ways.

From Mark Maske, Liz Clarke, and Nicki Jhabvala of the Washington Post:

Snyder testified that the team informed the NFL in 2009 about allegations against him that led to a $1.6 million settlement with a former employee who accused him of sexual assault. That assertion stood in contrast to Goodell’s June testimony, during which he was asked whether the league was told of the allegation and replied, “I don’t recall him informing [the league] of that, no.” The report said the NFL subsequently “informed the Committee that the Team did not disclose the specific nature of this allegation to the NFL until more than 10 years later, in 2020” during an investigation conducted by attorney Beth Wilkinson. Wilkinson’s investigation prompted a July 2021 agreement negotiated by the league and Snyder, under which the team was fined $10 million and Snyder stepped away from the franchise’s daily operations.

There was much more in the report, entitled “Conduct Detrimental: How the NFL and the Washington Commanders Covered Up Decades of Sexual Misconduct.”

It was revealed in the report that Snyder and the NFL did everything possible to bury the report put together by attorney Beth Wilkinson on Snyder’s misdeeds. It was revealed that Snyder’s people may have leaked the racist, homophobic, and misogynistic Jon Gruden e-mails to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal that forced Gruden to resign. And it was revealed that, as previously reported, Snyder hired private investigators to follow those who might stand in his way as an owner, despite everything that has gone wrong under his tenure.

On Friday, Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, who has been in Snyder’s corner all the way through, had some specific comments about the depth and breadth of the investigation. This he said on the “K&C Masterpiece” show on 105.3 “The Fan” [KRLD-FM] Dallas-Fort Worth, per our own Mark Lane of Texans Wire and Touchdown Wire:

“Love talking to you about the Cowboys, but know what influence you wield across the league,” host Kevin Hageland asked Jones. “I was curious if you could walk us through the logistics on situations like this where the report came out from the U.S. House committee about the Commanders. Does each team read that individually? Do y’all have a meeting about it? What are the logistics about how the owners deal with something like that?”

“First of all, I hope our fans see how politically biased this report is,” Jones said. “This report doesn’t even come out if the Republicans were in Congress. It’s that stupid. And, so, my point is there’s biasness all the way through. There are stories behind the stories. The facts are that Mr. Snyder’s minority partners really went out a long way to try and make him sell. He ended up buying them out, but a lot of this is that. A lot of the testimony, I was involved firsthand. I was among the handful of owners that looked at all of the transcripts, that looked at all of the messages, that looked at all of the data.

“This attorney is on a campaign, the woman attorney, to stop having settlements when you have workplace settlements. That’s another issue, but that’s a part of why this has the front that it has. And, so, there’s a lot more there. I will say this: I’m proud of what the Cowboys have done. We have an excellent [ER] department, excellent. They have been for years. We have committees of employees — I’m not on it, my family’s not on it — and we have thoroughly been involved in a long time trying to improve our workplace. Do we have room for improvement all over? Of course we do. Everybody does. I’m proud of where we are.”

The people running the show were… surprised by Jones’ comments.

It is not surprising that Jones would say this, because a number of Republicans politicians have as well — Jones is unfortunately not wrong here.

On December 7, one day before the report was released, Republican members of the House Oversight Committee sent a memo to the Republican Oversight Committee Staff.

“The Democrats’ sham investigation into the Washington Commanders has been an egregious waste of taxpayer-funded resources,” the memo said in part. “From the beginning, Committee Democrats weaponized their power and pushed a one-sided investigation into a private company with no connection to the federal government. This entire charade has been an attempt to distract the American people from President Biden’s self-inflicted crises.”

Jones will get his wish soon enough, when Republicans take majority of the House in 2023.

That the NFL’s most prominent owner, and one side of the House of Representatives, are in lock step on this issue? Well, that should come as no surprise, either.