The RACER Mailbag, April 16

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET …

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will be saved for the following week. 

Q: A 17-race IndyCar schedule is way too short, which in my opinion is the reason for the dip in viewership. They need to stop make these excuses that the Masters and NCAA Tournament is going to hurt viewership. It is what it is, the series is in competition with the United Football League, Major League Soccer, the NBA and the NHL. Just expanded to 22 races by adding Homestead, New Orleans and Richmond and keep Thermal. Having races every weekend will add more viewers for the series. Having these three week breaks in the schedule hurts the series.

Alistair, Springfield, MO

MARSHALL PRUETT: I don’t see the citing of The Masters or other big rival events as excuses. If an independent film debuts on the same weekend as a new Star Wars movie, there’s a 100-percent chance it gets overlooked and its ticket sales will suffer. Why wouldn’t the same effect happen here?

Without competition, IndyCar tends to generate solid TV audiences. Pitted against sports that are more popular? IndyCar falls to second or third on the list, if not fourth or fifth.

Its audience size reflects its current ranking among major sports, which is a mile behind anything involving a bat, ball, or club, and at least a half-mile behind NASCAR and F1. To quote Juan Pablo Montoya, “It is what it is.” I’ve lived in times where the opposite was true and IndyCar was the big dog, and I’m among the many who pray for its return to that exalted place.

I love the idea of more races being the answer to bigger TV audiences, if those extra events fall on weekends where IndyCar has the broadcast window to itself. But if it’s got big competition from one or two sports that have more fans, logic says those folks will go to what they prefer before checking out IndyCar.

More of something doesn’t automatically equate to greater popularity. MLB teams play 162 games per year, and most struggle to fill two-thirds of their stadiums and record TV ratings that suck.

Here’s what Sunday’s FOX audience of 552,000 viewers tells us: All of IndyCar’s diehards tuned in on big FOX, and that’s about it. Last year, buried on NBC’s USA cable channel, Long Beach produced 307,348, which was dismal. In the switch from a cable channel that nobody associated as the place to watch IndyCar, to a giant network home in a featured slot, Long Beach went from 300k to 550k. It’s nearly double, so that’s obviously a good thing, but it’s still a tiny number. Especially for the race that’s rightly hailed as the second biggest on the IndyCar calendar after the Indy 500.

Despite the competition from golf on CBS, I would have expected IndyCar on FOX at Long Beach to attract more than 550k. It’s disappointing, at least to me, and also acts as a reminder that no matter how much we love IndyCar, a massive effort lies ahead for the series and for FOX to bring it out of the shadows. This is an unwelcome reality check, but it is indeed what it is.

Q: I just read the news item saying that Hy-Vee will no longer sponsor the Iowa doubleheader. Do you know why Hy-Vee pulled out? It went from sponsoring a car and the doubleheader to getting out of IndyCar completely. Do you think this is a harbinger of rough times for IndyCar and teams finding sponsors?

Peter, Indianapolis, IN

MP: This change happened last year, so I wouldn’t take the news of Sukup (Sue-cup) Manufacturing being signed just now as a sign of anything meaningful in April of 2025. Hy-Vee underwent a CEO change, with Randy Edeker, a huge IndyCar fan who drove the deals with RLL and the series at Iowa, stepping down. A failure to renew the contracts after their completion in 2024 was not a surprise, since CEO changes often result in sponsorships going away.

Hy-Vee said Bye-Vee, but Iowa will still be awesome. Travis Hinkle/IMS Photo

Q: The talk about tariffs made me remember Swift. Back when IndyCar was choosing a new car, Swift was making Formula Nippon cars (now known as Super Formula). What are they doing nowadays?

That car was nice, it raced well and sounded great. I remember Swift’s IndyCar project was beautiful. I always wondered why Japan had an American company making its cars, but IndyCar couldn’t go with Swift to make theirs.

Also now with this talk in F1 about the V10 (which looks like will result in a V8), maybe IndyCar could switch to a V8. Ask Honda and Toyota if they still have those engines around. They sounded better than the IndyCar V8 from those years.

This seems like a very complicated moment to decide engine rules, isn’t it? So much uncertainty.

William Mazeo

MP: Made in San Clemente, Calif. I grew up working Swift’s NorCal distributor and built/prepped/ran countless Swifts. Of all the marques, it’s the closest to my heart, and I’d rate the longtail Swift DB-1 as one of the most beautiful race cars made.

V10s would be a play for entertainment alone since there’s zero road-car relevance at the point in time. Same with V8s as a mandated formula. But if a series lacks auto manufacturers, there’s no reason not to go with something loud, screaming, and entertaining. I feel for Penske Entertainment on this front. We know hybridization is genuinely important to a lot of manufacturers today. But will it hold the same importance in three to five years?

Q: Not surprisingly, push-to-pass was often talked about during the Long Beach broadcast. I swear the FOX guys never even mentioned the hybrid. Is the stored electric energy not self-deployed on demand to assist with overtaking and defense?

Shawn, MD

MP: The energy recovery system can harvest automatically, if that option is enabled prior to whatever session, but is not allowed to deploy automatically. That’s the sole responsibility of each driver.

And yes, if I’m an auto manufacturer in IndyCar and compete with hybrid engines to showcase or promote hybrid road-car technology, I’m livid.

I rewatched the race Monday night and don’t recall a single mention of the ERS being available as a push-to-pass tool. Heard tons about the turbo P2P and who had however much time left to use, but it’s as if the other, newer P2P is invisible. I did note, however, that in the Acura commercial I saw during the race, it used its hybrid IMSA GTP car in the ad.

Piastri solidifies a new benchmark in Bahrain

Only two races ago, I was writing about what a big milestone it was for Oscar Piastri to finally have the first pole position of his Formula 1 career, and how it was well-timed to pull him quickly back into range of teammate Lando Norris after he …

Only two races ago, I was writing about what a big milestone it was for Oscar Piastri to finally have the first pole position of his Formula 1 career, and how it was well-timed to pull him quickly back into range of teammate Lando Norris after he won in China.

It’s a sign of Piastri’s progression that by the time he took the second pole position of his career — just two races after the first — it already felt like a normal occurrence.

While much of the focus has been on the pressure that Norris is facing, and at times struggling with, there was certainty a degree of pressure on Piastri’s shoulders coming into this season, too. He should take it as a compliment, but the Australian was expected to provide a stern challenge to Norris and step up a level from the 2024 performances that were themselves a clear display of progression on his debut year. With the expectation came the additional pressure.

Piastri continued to develop rapidly. Last year’s qualifying head-to-head against Norris was 20-4 in the more experienced driver’s favor, whereas this time around it is already 2-2, and on the two occasions Piastri has been beaten it has been by an average of 0.058s.

In Bahrain, Piastri put over 0.4s into his teammate over one lap in qualifying, and that set up his relatively serene run to victory on Sunday, becoming the first repeat winner of the 2025 season in the process.

“I’ve been happy with how I’ve driven all season so far,” Piastri said. “Maybe not all the results have been exactly what I wanted, but I think this weekend has definitely been the result I wanted. I’ve been proud of the job that I’ve been doing and very proud of the job the team’s done.

“Obviously the car is in a great place. Still has its moments where it bites, but for a lot of the time it’s an incredible car to drive and clearly very quick. I’m very proud of the work we’re doing. This has been a track that’s not been kind to us in the past, so to have a weekend like we have had this weekend is a really meaningful result – outside of the victory.”

For McLaren it was a particularly important victory, not only because of the struggles the team has had around Bahrain in recent years — partly caused by a trend of starting the season slowly and updating the car later on — but also because of its Bahraini ownership.

An even sweeter scenario for Piastri making his mark in Bahrain — it essentially functions as a home race for McLaren. Kym Illman/Getty Images

On his 50th grand prix start, Piastri delivered the result when there were a significant number of guests and senior personnel on-site, and when he will have been fully aware of how much Zak Brown and Co. wanted the win. But handling external pressure is something that team principal Andrea Stella has noted is a strength of the 24-year-old.

“I am impressed, but not surprised,” Stella said prior to Piastri’s victory. “I’m not surprised because, for us, like I always repeat, it was very apparent pretty much straight away that we were dealing with a driver with incredible natural talent, but associated also to some particular characteristics I would say.

“I’ve always said that there’s no noise in Oscar’s head, which is a very useful characteristic in Formula 1, and I think this allows him to progress, to process information, to process what’s available in the situations as a way of improving himself at a very fast rate.

“For being race 50 in Formula 1, certainly what he’s achieving is pretty remarkable, but what I can say is that considering his qualities, and considering the way he approaches race weekend and his Formula 1 experience, I think he will be able to sustain this growth and this trajectory for the years to come. It’s a very interesting prospect for the entirety of Formula 1 I would say.”

Piastri hasn’t been around long, but the manner in which he’s burst from the shadows is remarkable. Steven Tee/LAT Images

Fifty races sounds like a big milestone, but in modern day F1 that’s a little over two seasons, and should serve as a reminder of how rapid Piastri’s rise has been since McLaren grabbed him from Alpine in the summer of 2022. In that time he has shown not only impressive development but also already delivered significant performances, that make the drive in Bahrain a strong one but not necessarily his finest.

“If you think of the victory in Baku [last year], for instance, it was a pretty crystalline, clinical victory, that one with [Charles] Leclerc attacking him every single lap,” Stella continued. “For me, this one is the one in which he’s been just the most robust. No hesitations, no inaccuracies. Everything that was available, he capitalized on. This gives me more the sense of robustness, solid racing.

“I think the Baku one was more on the edge. It was more pressure. This one was more managing gaps, if anything. But obviously, being strong at the start, restarts, it shouldn’t be taken for granted for somebody who is in their 50th race in Formula 1, which is quite impressive.”

But that’s exactly the compliment Piastri is earning already — that it is taken for granted because it is becoming more surprising if he is not able to put himself in a position to maximize a race weekend.

The robustness that Stella talks about is not only a strength of Piastri’s, but it contrasts with what appeared to be a fragility within his teammate in Bahrain. Norris could not put together a clean performance in qualifying or the race and saw Piastri cut his advantage in the drivers’ championship to just three points.

Piastri did it in typical, understated fashion, but it was the ideal display to let Norris know just what a battle he has on his hands this year.

Norris takes the heat as Piastri ramps up the pressure

Rival Formula 1 teams are really good at trying to increase expectations on each other, particularly when there is a car with an advantage. After it was Red Bull for so long, McLaren has become that team over the past six months, and certainly this …

Rival Formula 1 teams are really good at trying to increase expectations on each other, particularly when there is a car with an advantage.

After it was Red Bull for so long, McLaren has become that team over the past six months, and certainly this year after standing out as the likely frontrunner as early as pre-season testing.

That testing took place at the Bahrain International Circuit, so the strong showing in February naturally led to increased expectations of a McLaren victory this weekend at the same venue. And there was little to dispel that impression in the practice sessions as McLaren topped all three, showing particularly strong pace in FP3.

But the beauty of Bahrain is how little representative running there is, with FP1 and FP3 taking place in extremely high temperatures compared to the floodlit track time for qualifying and the race itself. While the margin the McLarens had in FP3 did not translate into the same gap in qualifying, Oscar Piastri’s advantage over Lando Norris did.

“I’m very happy,” the Australian said after securing his second pole position in three races. “I think the car all weekend has been in a good place. Maybe not in FP1 — but I don’t think anyone’s car was very good in FP1.

“Since then I’ve felt very comfortable. This morning, given the track conditions, it was a pretty solid performance and the car was very similar this afternoon, so I’m very, very happy with the job we’ve done. I’m proud of the job that I’ve done. I feel like I’ve put in a lot of good laps when I needed to and to come away with pole is obviously very nice.

“I think the performance we had in FP3 was even a mystery to us and we knew everyone would get a lot closer. It’s been kind of up and down for everybody. One session seems to be Charles [Leclerc] that’s challenging us, then George [Russell]. Max [Verstappen] was quick at certain points…

“It sort of seemed like everyone was peaking at different times. Still had to be on my toes because a tenth and a half was a bit closer than I expected after this morning, definitely.”

The momentum has been swinging Piastri’s way in Bahrain. Andy Hone/Getty Images

After the FP3 performance — when Piastri was 0.6s clear of Norris, who had aborted his first qualifying simulation after an error — there were impressed faces in the McLaren team. Piastri’s step forward over one lap in particular has not gone unnoticed, and there was a growing feeling that Norris had — understandably — been focusing more on Verstappen in recent months and would now have to turn more of his attention to his teammate.

With Piastri delivering on Saturday while the car offered such potential, it was Norris who didn’t handle the metaphorical heat put on by the Australian.

“It was just every lap, honestly — I’ve been off every lap this weekend, just not comfortable,” Norris said. “No big complaints — the car’s amazing. The car’s as good as it has been the whole season, which is strong. I’ve been off it all weekend. Don’t know why, just clueless on track at the minute. I just need a big reset or something.

“I don’t know [what the reason is], because Oscar’s doing a great job, so I can’t complain. I’m not going to have the excuse that I can’t drive my car. It’s my job to drive whatever car I’ve got, whether it’s easy or hard. And I’m not doing a good-enough job.

“I’m not comfortable. It doesn’t drive the way I like, but that’s not an excuse. The driver’s job is to drive whatever car they’re given, and I can’t drive this car quick enough.”

While the pressure has so far been ramped up by McLaren’s rivals, Norris — who is often harsh on himself — even adds a bit more on his own shoulders by talking up how good his machinery is.

“I just don’t know how to approach it. I can’t figure it out,” he admitted. “Every time I try something, it’s good for one session and then it’s the wrong thing for the next session, because the winds change. I just can’t flow with the car, and when I can’t flow, I’m not very quick.

“I’ve just got to work on myself. I can’t follow the team, and the car is the best by a long way. But clearly, I’m just not clicking at the minute.”

Norris has been his own harshest critic so far this weekend. Peter Fox/Getty Images

The insistence from Norris is that he’s not concerned about Piastri’s performance in the context of the drivers’ championship, but similar comments were made when he was asked about Verstappen and the title picture at times last year. While Norris dismissed it then, he later admitted how he’d been buying into the growing momentum and took the turnaround in Brazil particularly hard.

“Couldn’t care less. Like I said, I [only] care about myself. I don’t care about what the others do,” he said. “I’ve always known Oscar’s good — he’s quick and he’s doing the job I know he can achieve with the car that we’ve got. So, yeah, well done to him. But I’m more worried about my own performance than others. I don’t care about the rest of it.”

Last year, Norris starting consistently providing answers to doubters as he started winning races and taking regular pole positions, but he is clearly not high on confidence at this point in the season. Sunday provides him with a chance to answer back once again, but it’s now against a teammate who is looking increasingly capable of putting together a full championship challenge.

F1 power plays front and center in Bahrain

The race weekend in Bahrain was already set to be a political one after confirmation there would be discussions relating to future power unit regulations on Friday. Bringing together the power unit manufacturers, interested parties from teams, the …

The race weekend in Bahrain was already set to be a political one after confirmation there would be discussions relating to future power unit regulations on Friday.

Bringing together the power unit manufacturers, interested parties from teams, the FIA and representatives from Formula 1 to discuss the direction the sport heads in can be intense at the best of times. But when some are describing the meeting itself as “a complete waste of time” — to quote one expected attendee — there could be some significantly opposing views.

The discussion will center around the length of time the incoming set of V6 regulations run for, against a backdrop of certain stakeholders pushing for a return of a V10 engine running on sustainable fuel in the near future.

There’s a clear split between manufacturers that are and are not interested in such a discussion, but the topic was floated — in public anyway — by FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem and could become a key point of contention.

Not that Ben Sulayem and the FIA need any more of those right now.

24 hours before that meeting was due to take place, FIA deputy president for sport Robert Reid announced his resignation, citing a “governance crisis” that he could no longer be associated with. The press release from Reid described “a fundamental breakdown in governance standards within motorsport’s global governing body,” in perhaps the most powerful message from a departing member of Ben Sulayem’s team so far.

One of the reasons it was so powerful is because of where Reid stood within the organizational structure. He had been a significant figure within Ben Sulayem’s campaign and extremely senior within the FIA alongside Senate president Carmelo Sanz de Barros and deputy president for automobile, mobility and tourism, Tim Shearman.

But just before Ben Sulayem was set to make his first appearance of the year at a Formula 1 event — a high-profile platform for the president — he was seeing his leadership come under attack.

Only a day earlier, David Richards, the Motorsport UK chairman who had already publicly voiced his concerns, had used stronger language in claiming that “the governance and constitutional organization of the FIA is becoming ever more opaque and concentrating power in the hands of the president alone.”

Clive Mason/Getty Images

The topic of infighting within the FIA naturally become a topic throughout Thursday, but George Russell — a spokesperson for the drivers in his role as Grand Prix Drivers’ Association (GPDA) director — seemed almost apathetic towards the situation.

“Unfortunately, I think every time we hear some news from that side of the sport, it’s not really a big surprise,” Russell said. “It’s clearly a real shame to see, somebody who’s very well respected within the sport and been there for so long — as we keep saying, it’s like, ‘What’s next?’ So, it’s a shame to see, and hopefully we get more stability sooner rather than later.”

But as is often the case with Russell, he was still willing to elaborate. The Mercedes driver stated his apathy is shared with a wide number of his peers on the grid who feel like their involvement is not having an impact in many scenarios, but also — whether intentionally or not — suggesting there is a line that has the teams and F1 on one side and the FIA on another.

“He [Reid] did reach out — he sent a letter to the drivers just explaining his decision,” Russell said. “We’ve yet to talk with him; obviously it was news to us this morning. That’s at least when I found out about the news, and it was sort of shared among the drivers.

“Ultimately, it’s getting to a point now where these things are happening so often, and as drivers we were trying to get involved in the past, we didn’t really make much headway, and things seemed to continuously be going in an unstable direction.

“So I’ve got to be honest: We’re getting to a point now where our actions are having little impact with those guys, and we’ve got to trust in the teams and Formula 1 to work with the FIA to come to a common ground. If we can help, we want to be there, but often it just seems like things are going in their own direction.”

Russell’s stance extended to the situation Carlos Sainz finds himself in, having received a fine for being late to the national anthem ceremony in Japan while struggling with stomach discomfort. Sainz could face another fine heading his way after then swearing in the FIA press conference while discussing the topic, and Russell made a very pointed comment about where the “trust and faith of the drivers currently sits.”

“It’s a pretty expensive poo,” he remarked. “Look, we’ve been talking about this on and off for six months now. In all honesty, I don’t even want to give it any more airtime. From my own personal perspective, because we’ve sort of said everything we had to say over these months, unfortunately it has had little or no impact.

“All of the drivers have 100% trust and faith in Stefano [Domenicali, F1 CEO] and F1. We know that they work together with the teams. It’s in all of our interests to make something come out of all of this and just see stability and collaboration. Moving forward, we just want collaboration. It doesn’t make any sense to be fighting on these topics.”

But as has been pointed out, the fighting has been going on for a number of months and many on the drivers’ side feel they are not listened to, in much the same way the likes of Richards and Reid also criticize the governing body’s approach to decision-making.

Ben Sulayem’s presence in Bahrain will allow the president a right to reply as we move deeper into an election year, but it’s certainly shaping up to be a weekend where the off-track politics could threaten to overshadow the on-track competition. And that’s not a good place for either the FIA or F1 to be in.

The RACER Mailbag, April 9

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET …

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will be saved for the following week. 

Q: I have read eight or nine articles about Thermal in the last couple of weeks, including last week’s Mailbag. Below every article in the reader comments section, everyone is complaining about the absence of fans on the television broadcast. The main set of spectator bleachers were set high up on an embankment, about 20 feet above the track surface. The TV cameras are set up at track level. As the cameras pan around the track to catch the racing action, there is no way they will catch a view of the spectators because the bleachers are so high.

The bleachers at Thermal were packed, and it looked like there was more fans than Portland and several other races. At the beginning of the broadcast there was a brief drone shot of the bleachers and they looked full. Not sure what can be done to catch shots of the fans, but they were there – just high up and out of sight of the cameras.

Bob Gray, Canoga Park, CA

MARSHALL PRUETT: There weren’t more people at Thermal than “Portland and several other races,” unless we’re talking about Portland and other tracks and their non-IndyCar events. In that case, yes, the recent SCCA Regional at Portland had fewer fans than the Thermal IndyCar event.

There was indeed a small stretch of stands at Thermal that weren’t in a great location for TV cameras to catch, but we don’t need to dip into “alternate facts” to start a narrative that it was well-attended. I wish we were talking about lots of fans, but I was there, all three days, and no false impressions were given due to camera placement. I’d happily say so if that was the case.

Q: Since it was April Fools last week, can you share any good pranking (or similar) stories from your time in the paddock?

I remember watching a Grand Am race and chuckling to myself when the broadcast team reported that a European manufacturer, Volvo maybe, was building a Daytona Prototype after reading a “report” about that on April 1st.

Kyle

MP: Yeah, those were our friends at DailySportsCar who cooked up the thought-it-was-obvious-it-was-a-joke Volvo piece that was errantly raised as something real.

No April Fool’s stories to share from my days as an IndyCar or IMSA crew member, and that’s because the date was meaningless — at least in my era — because there wasn’t just one day where such things were tolerated; most days were spent messing with each other, making up nonsense to see who we could deceive, and practicing general asshattery to amuse yourselves or each other.

Don’t leave your car keys sitting out because they will end up hanging from the ceiling or tied in the middle of 20 feet of string that will take an hour to untangle. Don’t leave your car unlocked or something will get disconnected — nothing obvious and easily solvable — and leave you stranded for an hour. Don’t leave you phone untended, or your laptop unlocked…

Hell, it still goes on today. One colleague left his laptop/email open at the Nashville season-finale last year and we had plenty of fun. One person mentioned sending something, so at my urging, another colleague sent me an email from the person’s work account, saying they were burned out, tired of the company, looking for a change, and wanted advice. I replied (and copied in the owner of the company) that I was really disappointed in them for going to me first instead of the owner, chided them for the poor decision-making, and so on. All while they were out shooting and oblivious to the fake email exchange about wanting to quit. The owner, who’d grown accustomed to seeing fake and inflammatory emails when laptops were left open, knew it was a joke, but played along.

Failed to heed my own advice at Thermal in 2023 when I went for a few hot laps with Stefan Wilson. Put my phone and whatever else I had in my pockets on the pit wall, donned my helmet, strapped into the passenger seat, and off we went for 10 minutes. Sadly, Anders Krohn, who loves finding untended phones, knew that while he couldn’t unlock my phone, there was (still is?) an exploit where you can access and use the camera from the lock screen.

Stef pulls in, I hope out, and Krohn has that big dumb smile on his face. I knew I’d been “Krohn’d” and found at least 100 obnoxious selfies he took — maybe more — during our lapping session. I’ve kept them on my phone as a reminder.

Yes, we’re all a bunch of idiots. But we do have fun…

Next you’re going to tell me that the 2022 IMSA press release about plans to run the Roar Before the 24 on a dirt supercross track was a prank, too. Image via IMSA

Q: I’ve seen this on RACER comments: If IndyCar is going to lose both manufacturers, which means their marketing money is also gone, why not adopt IMSA’s model of fuel flow and torque limit to cut development, with manufacturers free to supply engines to as many teams as they want? If they want to have a factory team only, fine. If they want to supply it to more teams, fine too. Everyone would still build a V6. And Ilmor could be used to supply engines for teams that can’t make a deal with an OEM or some other independent engine builder (if it’s financially viable for them to join). Charge the same fees as IMSA and see where the series goes this way.

I mean, what else does IndyCar have to lose (in a scenario where they are already losing Chevy and Honda)?

One more question: How much did it cost to lease the Honda V8 back then? Did Honda subsidize the whole grid?

William Mazeo

MP: Honda supplied CART engines for many years, so there’s no single answer. In many cases, the engines were free, or free plus a lot of cash, which was a common practice for every manufacturer with its best teams (or teams that had a driver whose national origin was the same as the manufacturer) during CART’s best days in the 1990s. Adjusted for inflation, millions for the select teams without the right ties or driver, or ran towards the back.

How Verstappen changed the narrative for Red Bull in Japan

Red Bull came into this race weekend with a huge spotlight on the team. It was largely on the second seat and the driver change that had taken place, but it very much captured Max Verstappen in its glare, too. Verstappen had clearly not been happy …

Red Bull came into this race weekend with a huge spotlight on the team. It was largely on the second seat and the driver change that had taken place, but it very much captured Max Verstappen in its glare, too.

Verstappen had clearly not been happy with the decision to drop Liam Lawson after just two races. The Dutchman got on well with Lawson, had seen what he was capable of in the Racing Bulls car, and was certain that the issue was not with the driver alongside him, it was with the car.

That was an extension of the feeling from Verstappen when Sergio Perez was replaced at the end of last season, too, and with Red Bull still appearing to lag behind McLaren, it could easily have been interpreted that he was frustrated with the situation.

But far from letting that become his overall demeanor, he had already made very clear that how he feels on a personal level and how tough his RB21 is to drive do not have a direct correlation.

“I hear this all the time but for me nothing changes,” Verstappen told Sky Sports in China of whether he has patience with the team. “I’m actually very relaxed — I’m very positive in my mind. I’m enjoying life.

“So every time I jump in the car I just try to do the best I can, and I’m not thinking about anything else, to be honest, because I feel good in life in general — if that’s in the car, outside the car — and that’s actually what matters the most.”

Verstappen lets others worry about the political pressures of the moment and just focuses on driving. And it’s working out pretty well. Sam Bagnall/Getty Images

What also matters to Verstappen, though, is winning. On Saturday in Suzuka he pulled out a stunning qualifying lap that gave him a chance to do some more of that, and on Sunday he took that opportunity with both hands.

Decisively retaining his lead off the line, Verstappen always had enough of an answer for the lurking McLarens behind him, navigating the pit stop phase and then pulling out the extra few tenths of a second he needed whenever Lando Norris threatened to come within DRS range.

The superlatives were flowing, with his race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase calling it “perfection,” team principal Christian Horner saying it was “one of Max’s best weekends that he’s had.” And while those words do mean something to the four-time world champion, it’s also what his actions to earn that acclaim represent.

“It also means that I really care, even though of course it’s not been the easiest start to the year for us,” he said. “We are not where we want to be in terms of performance. I think that’s no secret.

“But this weekend has been really, really nice. Sometimes you have those kind of moments where you get some really great laps out of it. And luckily also the balance got a bit more together throughout that qualifying.

“So we just have to keep on working. I mean it’s nice, but I’m a person who doesn’t listen to the positives and the negatives. I’m just in the middle. I just focus on my own performances and just keep working, keep grinding.”

His qualifying upset of the McLarens gave Verstappen a leg up, and he made the most of it to give the Red Bull/Honda partnership a perfect final appearance in Japan. Clive Mason/Getty Images

Through that approach, Verstappen was able to deliver a result that went a long way to moving the focus away from the potentially negative aspects of Red Bull’s handling of drivers, and the far more positive celebration of the final Japanese Grand Prix of the Honda partnership.

The 27-year-old was already a legend in Honda’s eyes due to the four drivers’ championship he has won with its power units, but to win at Suzuka in a tribute livery when it never looked on the cards only cements its adulation for him.

“It means a lot to me,” Verstappen said of the significance of the result. “It was in the back of my mind as well. On those last few laps, I was like, ‘Well, I need to try and stay ahead – it would be a great story.’ Our final kind of farewell race together with Honda here in Japan. I’m incredibly proud of what we have achieved over all those years together. And I think this is like a perfect send-off.

“Already yesterday was a very beautiful day for us. And then of course to follow it up with a win is just fantastic. Honestly, the relationship that we’ve had with Honda has been amazing. I’ve really enjoyed my time with them — how they also work, how professional they are and how dedicated they are.

“They’ve given me so much. Together we’ve won four drivers’ championships and two constructors’. It’s been unbelievable and also, of course, something you’ll never forget.

“I said it would be insane to win here today, also for Honda on their track as well. So maybe it gave that extra motivation to try to stay ahead. But it’s a proper send-off. I mean, we couldn’t have wished for a better weekend, to be honest.”

Perhaps having Tsunoda on the podium too would have been the only way to top the last 24 hours from a Honda perspective, but from a Red Bull one its main priority is Verstappen’s pursuit of a fifth consecutive title.

Closing the gap to Norris to just a solitary point after three races provides a clear indication that the team and car can be a threat even while not operating at its best. But the team is surely going to be grateful to Verstappen, who made the difference behind the wheel to ensure he’s firmly in that spotlight for sporting reasons heading to Bahrain.

‘Only he can do it’ – Why Verstappen’s pole-winning lap at Suzuka turned heads

“Only he can do it.” High praise indeed for Max Verstappen, especially when it came from a smiling multiple world champion. Fernando Alonso did not hide his admiration when Verstappen crossed the line and bested the two McLaren drivers to pole …

“Only he can do it.”

High praise indeed for Max Verstappen, especially when it came from a smiling multiple world champion.

Fernando Alonso did not hide his admiration when Verstappen crossed the line and bested the two McLaren drivers to pole position at Suzuka. The Spaniard has long been a fan of Verstappen’s abilities, but even he appeared to be doubly impressed by what he had just seen.

“He’s an outstanding driver,” Alonso said. “He’s proving it every weekend. Hats off for him. I think the lap he did today is only down to him. I think the car is clearly not at the level to fight for pole or even the top five. But he manages to do magical laps and magical weekends. At the moment, he’s the best — he’s the reference for all of us, and we need to keep improving to reach that level.”

It really was a remarkable lap. Verstappen had no right to be in the mix for pole position, and I don’t think anyone in the right minds would have picked him as the Q3 runs began. Even though it’s Max Verstappen.

But the way he not only committed so much to his qualifying lap, but he executed too, was stunning to watch.

Clive Rose/Getty Images

Let’s not ignore the fact that both McLaren drivers could have beaten that late time. Maybe they even should have beaten that lap time. Had Lando Norris put together his first lap better then he would have been in position to attack his final run with less jeopardy, and Oscar Piastri’s sub-par first sector proved too costly to negate, despite the fastest overall next two sectors.

But they didn’t, and it’s hard to find many other drivers who would have been capable of giving them such a time to better than Verstappen had in the first place.

“We seemed to have a very competitive car today,” McLaren team principal Andrea Stella said. “Strong laps by both Lando and Oscar in Q1 and Q2, [and] in the first run of Q3 by Oscar. So it looked like we were on the way to pole position. Lando managed to improve significantly on his second set…

“But I think with Max I have stopped being surprised. He is such an incredible driver. And for me this is one of the many cases in which we have to just acknowledge and say hats off to Max. Well done in putting together, I guess, what was the potential of his car in conditions that were tricky with the wind and the grip a little inconsistent.

“Even if there was high grip and the lap times are actually I think the fastest times ever in Suzuka — which in itself is for some petrolheads is sort of an interesting piece of data, because actually I discussed this with the engineers and we thought we’re never going to beat the 2019 cars. And instead this happened, which is good.

“It would have been good if it was a McLaren but it’s Max.”

I must admit, I’ve had a feature titled “Verstappen’s primed to do something special” half-written since after the Australian Grand Prix, but have never completed it because other matters at Red Bull have taken over, never more so than this weekend. Maybe it’ll still get finished at some point, but you don’t need telling he might do something special now — he’s shown you he might.

If it goes to form, Verstappen is not going to win on Sunday. The McLaren is clearly quicker over one lap, and has both drivers ready to attack directly behind. The team can utilize the fact it has two cars in the fight — compared to just Verstappen from a Red Bull perspective — to try something different strategically if overtaking appears too tough in the opening part of the race.

But fortunately for all sports fans, competitions don’t always stick to form. The weather looks set to play a part in some way, and Verstappen in the wet is a tough combination to beat regardless of the car he is driving.

Suzuka is also not the easiest track to overtake on — although not impossible — so Verstappen is not likely to wave a McLaren by at any stage. His final stint in China showed that there is a chance his car can compete with any in certain conditions and on certain tire compounds, and that same compound he was quick on is in use this weekend again as the medium.

I’m the first to admit it was boring when Verstappen was winning everything with ease, even if such a level of performance was impressive. The same was true of Lewis Hamilton at Mercedes, whether the car was in a dominant phase or not — seeing the same name at the top of the timing screens at every race weekend is not always the most exciting situation, certainly when it comes to keeping a wider fan base engaged.

But Verstappen starting from pole position this weekend is an extremely enticing one, as it puts the pressure on the two McLaren drivers to do the chasing, as well as finding a way to beat each other.

The weekend started with huge scrutiny for the Red Bull driver situation, and I was also putting the focus on Verstappen’s frustrations with line-up changes when the car clearly has weaknesses that need addressing.

Those weaknesses have not gone away, but Verstappen continues to handle them and has served up the perfect reminder of why Red Bull would make such a brutal move with the Dutchman’s championship chances — and future with the team — in mind.

As Alonso said, he can produce something magical.

Why Frye and Rahal Letterman Lanigan are the perfect fit

Bobby Rahal, David Letterman, and Mike Lanigan were struggling to identify the right candidate. Facing frequent personnel changes and a recent competitive downturn, they’d been searching for someone to entrust with the running of their three-tiered …

Bobby Rahal, David Letterman, and Mike Lanigan were struggling to identify the right candidate.

Facing frequent personnel changes and a recent competitive downturn, they’d been searching for someone to entrust with the running of their three-tiered racing business and build a new success-driven culture.

In former NASCAR Cup team owner and 10-year IndyCar Series president Jay Frye, Rahal Letterman Lanigan Racing and Frye have found each other at the perfect time.

With an array of businesses to run outside of RLL, plus families to enjoy in their twilight years, 72-year-old Rahal and 74-year-old Lanigan aren’t meant to put in the 20-hour days that come with bringing a team back to title-contending prominence. Together, they sought a younger version of themselves with vast experience running teams, running businesses, and with in-depth marketing and sales knowledge to function as the daily engine that powers RLL in boardrooms, on the shop floor, and at the race track. Frye ticked every box.

Their new shop in Zionsville, Indiana, which houses the factory BMW M Team RLL IMSA GTP program, its three-car IndyCar effort, and BMW North America’s racing heritage collection, is a testament to RLL’s commitment to the sport.

The building also represents an abundance of unrealized potential. Being a modern team with the nicest garage in town is meaningless if the grand trophy case is largely filled with yesterday’s achievements. Creating reasons to open the case and add more hardware is why Frye was pursued by Rahal and Lanigan.

And for Frye, who was released by IndyCar in February, years of being underappreciated by the series owners met an end. Walled off from most of the areas of the job he performed before IndyCar’s purchase by Penske Entertainment, the chance to dive headfirst into RLL’s competitive restoration process was the best offer among the many he received. The prospects of being happy and fulfilled and empowered by folks he knows and respects was another part of the job’s appeal.

Frye should have a steadying effect on RLL after becoming its third team leader in the last four years. RLL hired Piers Phillips as its president heading into the 2019 season, but that relationship met an abrupt end late in 2022. After Phillips, RLL brought former Honda Racing Corporation VP Steve Eriksen into the fold in January of 2023. Eriksen was invaluable in specific ways, but the big, long-term fit they’d hoped for didn’t develop, which spurred the search that led them to Frye. Eriksen was released once Frye was secured.

Frye’s unexpected availability was fortuitous for RLL, which was looking to address weaknesses that aligned well with Frye’s strengths. Chris Graythen/Getty Images

And now, like Chip Ganassi has Mike Hull and Roger Penske has Tim Cindric, RLL has Frye.

RLL’s IndyCar program is a familiar one to its new president, which is good, because it’s farther away from the front than its IMSA campaign. The last time RLL was in the championship mix? Graham Rahal was second leading into the last race of 2015 but fell to fourth in the final standings; Buddy Rice owns RLL’s best championship finish of the century with third in 2004.

Two years removed from its last IndyCar win, Frye has an intensive learning process to go through within the company to find its strengths and weaknesses. Who needs to go, stay, or be recruited? Is everyone in the right position? Are there voids in management? What level of accountability is in place across the various departments?

In a personnel-driven sport, it’s who you have, their ideas, their capabilities, the supportive infrastructure, the tools they’re given, and their individual performances that separate winners from losers. The cars and drivers are equally important, but ultimately, it’s people vs. people. And Frye is about as people-first as it gets.

For RLL to become a threat to its title-worthy rivals, hard decisions and constant tuning will also be required. Changes are coming.

It’s here where some of the progress has already been made coming into 2025. A revolving cast of drivers and engineers have made it nearly impossible for the IndyCar side to establish a solid baseline and build the kind of consistency and quality required to hassle the Ganassis, Penskes, Andrettis, and McLarens. Although two of its three drivers are new, RLL’s talented engineering group has received the overdue attention it deserved.

A new leadership structure was created. More engineers have been hired. New investments in engineering R&D programs have also been carried out. But there are no immediate fixes to apply that will fire the trio of Graham Rahal, rookie Louis Foster, and Devlin DeFrancesco ahead of the main contenders. Together, the latest version of RLL’s IndyCar engineering corps has real promise, but it needs time to jell.

One area where Frye would be smart to get started on is finding RLL’s next marquee driver.

We can’t underestimate how the loss of Christian Lundgaard to Arrow McLaren has affected the IndyCar program. Having grown tired of the shortcomings associated with a midfield team, the Dane jumped at the chance to leave. The move has already paid off: Lundgaard sits fourth in the standings, four points shy of second after two races.

RLL’s BMW GTP program in IMSA is currently more competitive than its IndyCar counterpart, but needs to convert strong qualifying results into wins. Jake Galstad/IMSA Photo

In his absence, Rahal has had an encouraging start with runs to 12th and 11th across the opening races, but the teams RLL is chasing continue to operate in a different area code. DeFrancesco is 21st, and Foster is 27th and last after a pair of rough introductions to IndyCar at St. Petersburg and The Thermal Club.

The highly-rated 2024 Indy NXT champion can’t be expected to pick up where Lundgaard left off. The most experienced team managers will tell you it takes at least two to three years for talented NXT drivers to discover most of their potential. Assuming that clock is close to accurate, it will be 2027 or 2028 before Foster would be in front-running form.

DeFrancesco continues to deliver his best work on Fridays and Saturdays, but his decision-making on Sundays is where the stumbles tend to emerge. It leaves Rahal, at 36, and in his 19th IndyCar season, as its on-track leader.

RLL’s best showings of the decade belong to Rahal, who placed sixth in 2020 and seventh in 2021. With a rapid car he’s certainly capable of repeating that form, but looking down the road, there isn’t a ton of runway left for Rahal as a full-time IndyCar driver.

Whether it’s a young IndyCar star approaching free agency, or another instantly-ready type from European open-wheel – which it might already have in the still-under-contract Juri Vips – RLL would benefit from zeroing in on the next Lundgaards and Rahals to race into 2030 and beyond.

After the future driver hunt, Frye’s marketing and sales expertise could be put to use in trying to land sponsors for the team’s third IndyCar, which relies on funded drivers. Sponsor-wielding drivers are a necessity for some outfits, and thanks to them, those teams remain in business and 15-20 people have jobs to support their families. But only in the rarest of instances do those drivers make the team more competitive.

Converting the third car from being available for hire to having the budget to pay a badass to form a three-car assault on the championship is an important development for RLL to reach its full potential. And like so many other items on Frye’s to-do list, it won’t be resolved in an instant.

RLL’s IMSA wing is in better shape, with BMW’s M Hybrid V8 GTP car taking its most recent victory last September. The BMWs have been fast, with pole positions to start the season at Daytona and Sebring, but the raw pace hasn’t been converted into podiums. Porsche and Acura are off to impressive starts this season, and to help raise BMW’s GTP game, Frye needs to learn the inner workings of endurance sports car racing — a new arena for him — while getting up to speed on everything else that comes with the job.

Frye’s hiring speaks to Rahal and Lanigan’s motivation to leave the midfield behind in IndyCar and take the fight to the other GTP manufacturers. There could be a few uncomfortable moments ahead as Frye sits in his first IndyCar team owner/manager meetings alongside his new bosses while staring back at his old bosses, but the awkwardness will pass.

He poured himself into IndyCar, came with the series when it was purchased, and was eventually rejected. And then the best thing happened following a bad breakup: Frye was courted and chosen by RLL to lead its proud organization at a pivotal time.

Self-worth restored. Inner doubts quieted, if not erased. RLL will prosper from Frye’s arrival. Good things do happen to good people.

The RACER Mailbag, April 2

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET …

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will be saved for the following week. 

Q: First time question, long time RACER fan: IndyCar needs to differentiate itself from F1 and other racing to new fans. What is more different than an intimate Sunday with the world’s best racing fans at The Thermal Club!

Five thousand fans at Thermal Club, with incredible access to cars drivers and announcers, vs the embarrassing 5,000 (maybe) fans at TMS. It’s not exclusive, it’s available to an average race fan, with tickets at $475 for the weekend. This is very fair. I travel to Chicago Bears games and often pay much more per ticket for four hours of “entertainment.” I also pay that much for GPLB for full access (photo pass and a race day seat).

I’ll take Thermal. Don’t hide from the small crowd, promote it as an awesome close-up and amazing experience. It’s at a fantastic venue that we gearheads can only dream about. Find a non-racing celebrity to promote and be at the race. If Thermal would allow the access, show the crazy cool cars that “live” there and we only dream about. We all know only the rich can afford it, but that’s race cars, it is what it is. I’ve been to 86 open-wheel races, and am a big fan of the Indy 500 and the Milwaukee Mile, but oval racing looks terrible with empty stands. The background of mountains and palm trees looks good on TV. The small crowd is not that obvious and is part of this unique race.

Thoughts, Marshall?

Bob (lifetime race fan)

MARSHALL PRUETT: F1 is the most exclusive form of racing on the planet and features exorbitant costs to attend, so IndyCar is doing the opposite of differentiating itself from F1 by doing exactly what F1 does but minus the packed houses F1 gets at those crazy prices. So IndyCar ends up looking small and unimportant.

According to Penske Entertainment CEO Mark Miles in a call on Friday, Thermal had “3000-ish fans.” To the person tuning in to watch who doesn’t visit RACER.com every day to digest every piece of IndyCar news, all they’d see is a bunch of cars and nobody there to watch them. Not sure how to spin that as a positive. Don’t get me wrong; the place is amazing and I’ve enjoyed every visit since the first for preseason testing in 2023. But if I focus on what’s best for IndyCar while it’s trying to become bigger and more known, holding races in the middle of nowhere with a tiny crowd just ain’t it.

Fix that by at least getting 10,000-15,000 people there to fill some grandstands, and it becomes viable.

If an IndyCar drives by and nobody’s there to hear it, does it make a sound? Jake Galstad/Lumen

Q: I’m a longtime IndyCar fan – old enough to remember the heady days of CART, which probably peaked around when Nigel Mansell came to town.

I’m wondering if it’s just me or is something missing this season? Is there a decline in the star power of the current crop of drivers? I’m a 35+ year fan and even I don’t know squat about half the field this year. Don’t get me wrong, I know there’s some serious talent currently racing, but if I were to walk into a bar and start talking about the amazing IndyCar Series, who would the average person recognize? Scott Dixon? Will Power? “Maybe” to both, am I right? Of course there’s some others like Josef Newgarden, Pato O’Ward and Colton Herta just to name a few, but I’m pretty sure I’d get blinky eyes of non-recognition in return here in Australia.

In my humble opinion, IndyCar and FOX would be wise to get on the horn ASAP to get any of the old legends like Paul Tracy, Dario Franchitti, Mario (it doesn’t help that Michael has gone AWOL), Al Unser Jr., Helio, Robby Gordon… heck even Colton’s dad and Tony Kanaan are there every weekend and would have great perspectives, no?

Jason Mulveny, aka Bananaspeed, Sydney, Australia

MP: First question I’d ask is what’s different about this year? Palou, Herta, Power, Dixon, O’Ward, Newgarden, etc., have all been the marquee drivers for the last three or four years, and there’s nothing unique I can think of so far in 2025 that stands out as unique from last year, or the year before, etc. The same lack of CART-era star power is old news; Helio and Dario and Danica Patrick were the most recent drivers with big crossover appeal, but Danica left after 2011, Dario was forced to retire after 2013, and Helio’s been Indy-only since 2024.

But IndyCar also hasn’t had a TV partner that’s been as motivated as FOX to try and build today’s stars into bigger names, so are we going to poop on them for failing to fix decades of poor efforts by the series and its former broadcasters… after all of two races?

There’s also the generational item at hand. Almost everyone you mentioned as legends, except for Bryan Herta and Tony Kanaan who are actively involved today, have no relevance to those who either weren’t born or weren’t following when they were big deals. What would a 25-year-old IndyCar fan care to hear from Robby Gordon, whose last IndyCar start came when they were 4? Might be fun for those older fans, but is having old legends on the broadcasts going to move the needle? I just can’t see it.

Let’s give FOX some time to try and improve the situation before turning the presentations upside down.

Can Tsunoda survive in F1’s toughest seat?

Yuki Tsunoda is ready for the toughest job in motorsports. Or, at least, he believes he is. At 24, with four seasons in Formula 1 plus a strong start to 2025 under his belt, he’s better-prepared for this opportunity than the man he replaced, former …

Yuki Tsunoda is ready for the toughest job in motorsports. Or, at least, he believes he is. At 24, with four seasons in Formula 1 plus a strong start to 2025 under his belt, he’s better-prepared for this opportunity than the man he replaced, former teammate Liam Lawson, and backs himself to thrive despite the fact that partnering Max Verstappen at Red Bull Racing is regarded by most as career poison.

Tsunoda has nothing to lose. This was destined to be his last year in the Racing Bulls fold, with Red Bull team principal Christian Horner saying last December that after five years in what he called the “support team,” there comes a point where “you’ve either got to let them go at that point or look at something different.” Tsunoda has proved himself worthy of a seat on the F1 grid, but opportunities are limited for ’26 if Red Bull’s B-team does not retain him. The jump to Red Bull presents an opportunity to change the direction of his career, and perhaps even establish himself in a front-running team for the long term.

It’s a big ask, given that not only is he being pitched into a seat regarded by most as the toughest in F1 but also doing so with no prior experience of the car, two races into a season, and for his home grand prix. The devotion of the home crowd and the desire of circuit owner Honda for him to thrive means the pressure will be intense, and how Tsunoda deals with that could set him up for success or failure at Red Bull. He will get more than the ludicrous two weekends afforded to Lawson, but the die will likely be cast one way or the other at Suzuka. Red Bull will soon turn its attention to identifying a replacement for ’26 if Tsunoda doesn’t convince – and convince quickly.

This is a fascinating challenge considering sources within Red Bull have long made it clear that question marks over Tsunoda’s mentality, more than his driving ability, led to him repeatedly being passed over for promotion. This all started when Tsunoda first tested for what was then called AlphaTauri in the post-season Abu Dhabi test in 2020 and the team was astonished by how vocal and emotional his communications were over the radio. It is something Tsunoda has, by his own admission, had to work on.

However, the perception has become increasingly anachronistic as Tsunoda has improved what he calls his “emotional control” significantly. The last time there was a notable problem was in the Bahrain Grand Prix in 2024, when team orders frustrated him late on and he made a statement with an odd lunge and lockup past Daniel Ricciardo on the slowdown lap. Since then, Tsunoda has been in a better place, aside from using an ableist slur during Austrian Grand Prix qualifying, for which he offered “big apologies,” as well as paying a substantial fine. But unacceptable language aside, too often legitimate pushbacks to team instructions are interpreted as problematic when they shouldn’t be. The most recent example was in the Chinese Grand Prix, when he was right to demand he work the front end harder and didn’t accept the pit wall telling him not to. Shortly afterwards, his reasoning was understood and the team backed the decision. Therefore, the idea of a driver who is not working with his team is an outdated one.

Tsunoda was relatively undercooked when he first arrived in F1 with AlphaTauri in 2021 (above) but has become far more well-rounded in the years since. Lars Baron/Getty Images

F1 has been a steep learning curve for Tsunoda. When he arrived in 2021, finishing ninth on debut in Bahrain, he had a single season in each of European F3 and F2 under his belt and was still very much a work in progress. He confessed to underestimating how tough the step up to F1 would be, and his first season was a chastening experience with too many mistakes. But he gradually learned, to the point where he was able to become the team’s spearhead once Pierre Gasly left for Alpine at the end of 2022. He’s now a far more dependable driver, and any patchiness in his results is more down to his team’s inconsistency than his own shortcomings.

The first two weekends of this year have illustrated that. In Australia, he ran in the top six until the rain returned on lap 44. The team flip-flopped on strategy, leaving him out for too long while other teams called their cars in, turning a strong result into a pointless afternoon. A similar thing happened in the Chinese Grand Prix, where Racing Bulls stuck with a two-stop strategy as others adapted to one. Only his strong run to sixth in the Shanghai Sprint rewarded him with points in a season where he has been a standout performer. The question now is whether he can translate his superb form at Racing Bulls into Red Bull Racing driving a faster, but much trickier, car.

To make his promotion work, Tsunoda must at least partially replicate Verstappen’s skill for extracting the potential from a difficult car. The Red Bull RB21 has plenty of downforce and grip; the trouble is accessing its potential consistently due to its balance limitations. Success or failure in doing so makes the difference between it being a podium threat and being at risk of elimination in Q1. Verstappen’s extraordinary ability is to drive the car in a way that minimizes the limitations and makes the most of that potential.

In qualifying especially, Verstappen’s otherworldly ability to manipulate the car on the brakes and turn-in is what unlocks its performance. The RB21 is prone to both understeer and rear-end snaps, but Verstappen can load the front axle at turn-in to give it the front end grip it needs without the rear stepping out of line. Doing so requires remarkable sensitivity, precision, adaptability and the capacity to react near-instantaneously to the feedback from the car. It’s the F1 equivalent of walking the tightrope. By contrast, Lawson has fallen repeatedly and therefore driving to a much lower ceiling – hence his references to the difficulty of finding “the sweet spot” with this car.

This isn’t simply the problem of a car developed for Verstappen, who thrives with a strong front end and can control the resulting rear-end instability most find too responsive. While such dynamics have the potential for the highest performance ceiling, this requires astonishing talent to control. Yet with the RB21, Verstappen faces an even tougher challenge with a car he says “is still not where I want it to be.” His driving is a delicate form of bullying that is beyond most.

So can Tsunoda do what Verstappen does? It’s unlikely, given Verstappen is, at 27, already established as one of the all-time greats and few drivers in the history of grand prix racing have his ability. The more pertinent question is whether Tsunoda can approximate the Verstappen technique enough to do the job Red Bull needs. That’s usually framed by the team as being about three-tenths off and banking regular points – although as a racing driver with unshakable confidence, Tsunoda himself will doubtless back himself to do far more than that.

There is a reference point, which is the post-season Abu Dhabi test last year. Tsunoda logged 127 laps in the 2024 Red Bull, which was less an opportunity offered by Red Bull and more one facilitated by power unit supplier Honda, which has backed Tsunoda since his early days in single-seaters. There, Tsunoda claimed to feel comfortable in the car and able to push it to the limit.

Verstappen’s driving style doesn’t work for many other drivers, but Tsunoda will need to adopt elements of it to have a shot at reaching the RB21’s potential. Clive Mason/Getty Images

“I think so — I didn’t really struggle much to adapt,” said Tsunoda. “I didn’t have many dirty laps. On the long runs, I have been able to run consistently and straight away felt the limitations of the car, which if you don’t have confidence in the car, you can’t feel any limitations.”

Although Tsunoda showed what he could do, the die had already been cast and Red Bull’s decision was made – Lawson was going to replace Sergio Perez, subject to the payoff being finalized with the Mexican. The willingness to make the swap with Lawson so early in the season confirms that Tsunoda did a good job in Abu Dhabi.

Tsunoda is definitely better qualified for the challenge than he would have been a couple of years ago and is promoted to Red Bull Racing with the kind of experience two of his predecessors, Alex Albon and Pierre Gasly, had. Tsunoda is, by inclination, a late braker. When I asked him about that in November 2023, this is how he described his style:

“Stronger and fast,” said Tsunoda. “The initial part is stronger. I’ve never seen a driver where the initial part is stronger than me. The releasing part, the later part, he [teammate Ricciardo] is good at. I can learn something from that as a driver.”

This was a significant phase of Tsunoda’s development, one that broadened his window. While his original F1 teammate, Gasly, is also by inclination a late braker, one who thrives attacking the corner provided that the rear end is predictable enough to give him confidence, Ricciardo showed Tsunoda another way. That’s expanded Tsunoda’s toolkit as a driver and, critically, given him a deeper understanding of the value of manipulating the car’s balance using the brakes. To do what Verstappen does, braking late is not an option as it just means struggling to get the car turned. Then you are limited on traction when you try to feed the power in thanks to the extra lock required to get the car through the rest of the corner. Tsunoda at least has a grounding in how to try and achieve this.

The pressure is on, but this is potentially life-changing opportunity for Tsunoda, who can transform himself from handy midfielder to frontrunner. In terms of experience, the timing is right even if it would have been better to give him a winter and pre-season to prepare, but this is the opportunity he craves to prove he can do what Gasly, Albon, Perez and Lawson failed to do before him.

If Tsunoda delivers, and that doesn’t mean matching Verstappen but simply being a useful number two for Red Bull, then this could be a career-making opportunity. If not, it will be a career-breaking one, but at least he’ll have had the belated chance to show what he can do in the least hospitable seat in F1.