Nets ability to stay connected has carried them through Kyrie Irving’s absence

The fact Brooklyn’s two best players throughout this stretch without Kyrie Irving have been Nets for years doesn’t surprise Keny Atkinson.

Jarrett Allen and Spencer Dinwiddie have been two of Brooklyn’s best players throughout 2019-20, and they’ve both taken major steps forward in the time Kyrie Irving has been sidelined due to a right shoulder impingement.

That’s not to say Irving’s presence on the floor doesn’t allow them to flourish — they both had their share of strong showings alongside Irving. Their play is a sign of their maturation as players, especially the more mild-mannered Allen.

With those two being the ones leading the charge over the last five games, the rest of the roster has had an easier time rallying around the pair because they’re part of the core that’s called Brooklyn home for some time. Kenny Atkinson stressed the same point to reporters following the 108-106 win over the Cleveland Cavaliers on Monday.

It’s just how connected these guys are and it does help that it’s guys that have been here for a long time. I think that continuity helps. [Garrett Temple] is kinda the new guy in that group. [Taurean Prince], too. But we got guys that have been here that understand what we’re doing, that helps a lot.

Atkinson stressed Brooklyn’s connectedness a second time in his postgame press conference. He explained it’s why he felt confident about the Nets’ chances going into halftime.

You feel like they were locked into this game. They were ready to go. I thought, physically, in the first half, we did not look good, but I felt like we got stronger as the game went on. But I think it’s their mental approach. They’re a connected group right now. They’re feeling good about themselves. It carried over [and] got us a win tonight.

With their improved connectedness comes improved defense, which plays in Brooklyn’s favor with their two best scorers (Irving and Caris LeVert) out. Now the Nets just need to find a way to maintain the chemistry they’re developing when their injured teammates return.

Good, bad, worse: Give Deontay Wilder respect he deserves

Deontay Wilder deserves credit for what he has accomplished even if you’re critical of his boxing skills.

GOOD

One tweet seemed to represent the anti-Deontay Wilder sect after the heavyweight titleholder’s chilling one-punch knockout of Luis Ortiz on Saturday night in Las Vegas: “Wilder is still pure (excrement).”

What does Wilder have to do to cease being excrement?

The Tweeter obviously was referring to Wilder’s perceived lack of elite boxing ability. What about results? Wilder has had 43 heavyweight fights. He has ended 41 of them early, including Bermane Stiverne in their rematch. The only opponent he hasn’t knocked out is Tyson Fury, with whom he drew last December.

Isn’t the objective to win? The man is unbeaten and has successfully defended his title 10 times, which ties Muhammad Ali at No. 5 on the all-time list in a single heavyweight reign. He also moved into No. 7 for total defenses.

And isn’t a second goal to entertain the spectators? The fans love spectacular knockouts and Wilder delivers … again and again and again.

Wilder will never be a great technician. He admits it. If that is something you require to enjoy boxing, then Wilder isn’t for you. If you admire a fighter who wins consistently and provides one thrill after another, enjoy Wilder while you can. He’s 34.

And for the record: He certainly is a good enough boxer. He has the ability to set up his big shots, to position himself at the right distance, to recognize an opportunity and to unload at just the right time. That takes skill.

Wilder said at the post-fight news conference: “I deserve respect.” Yes, he does.

 

BAD

Deontay Wilder’s knockouts should be celebrated on a grander scale than they are now. Ryan Hafey / Premier Boxing Champions

The reported attendance at the Wilder-Ortiz card was 10,000-plus. The capacity at the MGM Grand Garden Arena is around 17,000. And if I had to guess the number of domestic pay-per-view buys it will have generated, I’d say around 350,000.

Those aren’t impressive numbers, which is not a good commentary on Wilder’s popularity.

What’s going on? One theory is that this isn’t a good time of year, with the holidays around the corner, to stage a major fight. That makes sense. Competition from the NFL, college football and the NBA doesn’t help, obviously.

Frankly, fighters aren’t promoted like they used to be. And, who knows, maybe he’d resonate with more sports fans if he fought more often. That just isn’t how it’s done these days.

What’s the point? All of the above is a shame given the excitement Wilder generates. His knockouts should be celebrated in a way that Mike Tyson’s once were because they’re every bit as dramatic.

Again, though, these are different times. Boxing, while perfectly healthy, isn’t as mainstream as it once was. Even a dominating heavyweight champion, as Wilder is becoming, can largely fly under the radar in today’s environment.

Perhaps Wilder will gain more and more traction across a larger landscape with every opponent he puts to sleep going forward. In the meantime, those who are paying attention now are having a blast.

 

WORSE

Brandon Figueroa (left) said Julio Ceja’s extra weight was a factor in their fight. Ryan Hafey / Premier Boxing Champions

The word knowledgeable people use is “unprofessional.”

Luis Nery came in a pound overweight for his scheduled fight against Emmanuel Rodriguez on the Wilder-Ortiz undercard. He was given time to lose the pound but reportedly refused to make an attempt. He subsequently offered Rodriguez money and a rehydration limit but Rodriguez decided that danger exceeded reward and the fight was canceled.

Nery also has failed to make weight in the past. Suggestion: Move up a division.

Julio Ceja failed to make the junior featherweight limit by a whopping 4½ pounds, which technically made him a junior lightweight, for his fight with Brandon Figueroa. Still, Figueroa agreed to go ahead with the fight.

Perhaps that was a mistake. Ceja was an immovable object in the fight, which ended in a controversial draw. Afterward, Figueroa said Ceja’s extra weight was a factor.

“I basically fought a person in a weight class above mine tonight,” Figueroa said. “I’m pretty sure if he weighed 122, it wouldn’t even be a close fight. We have to run the rematch back but he better make the weight.”

Fighters have always pushed the limit on weight, believing they’ll have an edge over their opponents the lower they go. That’s not going to change. Fighters will continue to miss weight.

That said, it might be good idea to follow this plan: One, make weight. Two, in the event that doesn’t happen, try to make the limit within the extra time allotted. And, three, if that doesn’t work, make a reasonable offer when negotiating to step into the ring overweight.

In other words, be professional.

 

John Ryder and the unfortunate plight of the boxing B-side

You may have heard that North Londoner John Ryder had the performance of his life on Saturday night at the Echo Park Arena in Liverpool.

OPINION

You might’ve heard that North Londoner John Ryder gave the performance of his life against hometown favorite and titleholder Callum Smith on Saturday in Liverpool. You might’ve also heard that it didn’t matter one iota. After 12 rounds, the judges gave Smith a clean sweep: 117-111, 116-112 and 116-112.

It was boxing’s latest mind-numbing deviation from reality.

Though the early rounds were nip and tuck, Ryder outworked and outlanded Smith for the majority of the second half of the fight, pushing his taller foe up against the ropes and ripping shots to the body and head. Not all of them landed, but some of the got through cleanly. Ryder was the aggressor and, more importantly, the more effective fighter. If Smith was supposed to be the best super middleweight in the world, he certainly did not look it that night. Moreover he had no answer for Ryder’s inside game. Boxing Junkie scored it 116-112 for the challenger. Scorekeeping is subjective, sure, but to an extent. The official outcome seemed like a willful distortion of what actually took place in the ring.

The sensible thing to do would be for the organizers to arrange a rematch. Not going to happen, according to Smith’s trainer and manger John Gallagher.

“It was a good performance (from Ryder),” Gallagher quipped during the post-fight press conference, “but it doesn’t warrant a rematch.”

Gallagher was adamant that his man won comfortably.

“Callum Smith did a good fight tonight, and he held off the challenge from the mandatory,” Gallagher said. “… I think (Smith) lost one in the first six or seven (rounds). … John had a couple of good rounds in the middle, and Callum came back at the end. I had it 8-4 at the end of the bell, something like that. At least seven rounds.”

Did Gallagher forget that it was Smith who had his back against the ropes in Round 12, bowing under the weight of Ryder’s combinations? 

When a reporter mentioned that Ryder and his team would be pushing for a rematch, Gallagher scoffed.

“He’s fought, he’s won. It was his mandatory,” Gallagher said. “Now he’s got to move on. There are some good domestic fights (for Ryder) after that performance. John Ryder-Rocky Fielding II, that’s unfinished business there. That two fighters there, if Canelo (Alvarez) gives up his regular belt, they can fight for that.”

In other words, thanks for your effort, John, but back to the kiddie pool you go. The condescension continued, with Smith implying, quite ludicrously, that his poor performance was a result of Ryder not instilling any sense of fear in him.

“Fear brings out the best in me,” Smith said. “People are going to see how good I am when I’m in against the very best.

For Smith, it’s off to bigger and better things, like a potential clash with Alvarez.  

If Ryder expected to get a helping hand from his own promoter, Eddie Hearn, who also promotes Smith, he didn’t get it. Asked by Gallagher if he planned to petition the WBA, which sanctioned the bout, on Ryder’s behalf, Hearn replied, “It’s not up to me to appeal to the WBA, Joe. But I agree with you. I think (Ryder) should fight for one of the regular belts.”

Who needs enemies when you have friends like Hearn?

The collective comments reveal once more the brutal hierarchy of professional boxing. The A-side Smith will always get the benefit of the doubt and move on to bigger things, while the B-side, even on their best nights, end up having to go back to the drawing board. It’s a crying shame.

And Ryder is more familiar with the proverbial drawing board than most. He came up short in controversial losses to Rocky Fielding, Jack Arnfied and Billy Joe Saunders, a fight many observers felt Ryder did enough to win. Ryder was also dominating Nick Blackwell before he got caught with a shot in the seventh round. In other words, Ryder is better than what his record of 28-5 might indicate.

To his credit, Ryder stayed composed and professional during his post-fight interview on Saturday night. He felt he won the fight and that the scorecards were a bit wide, but he didn’t go off on a tirade about corruption in the sport. Not that anyone watching would have begrudged him for it.

In the end, it was the Callum Smith show, and Gallagher was not going to entertain another bad word.

“I’d also like to say there’s too much negativity,” Gallagher said. “We’ve got to be celebrating Callum Smith tonight. He fought his mandatory, knocked back the challenger John Ryder, won it, no matter what they say. It’s been 11 years since a British fighter defended the Ring Magazine belt in this country, Hatton, before that Calzaghe. You guys stop being so negative on the kid. He should be getting rounds of applause here.”

Applause and a large rug to sweep the night under.

Broncos should start playing Drew Lock now

Following an absolutely dismal performance from Brandon Allen, it’s time for the Denver Broncos to put Drew Lock on the field.

To the Denver Broncos’ front office, coaching staff and anyone else who wants to listen: we have seen quite enough.

We have seen enough of these veteran retreads at the quarterback position and we have seen enough of Brandon Allen, though he gave quite an effort in the games he has started.

However, against the Buffalo Bills on Sunday, as Allen was completing just 10 of 25 passes for 82 yards during another rough loss, fans had to be watching the game and asking themselves, “how much longer is the team going to try and win games this way?”

Aside from a great four years from Peyton Manning, the Broncos haven’t had good quarterback play for what seems like forever. The team has been trying to win with Trevor Siemian, Paxton Lynch, Brock Osweiler, Case Keenum. Flacco and Allen.

None of it has even come close to working and now unless the Broncos win each of their final five games they will have a losing season for the third year in a row.

How did this happen?

This happened because the team has failed to develop a quarterback and has hoped that another team’s castoff will pan out in Denver.

The team did draft Drew Lock in the second round back in April but has decided not to activate him off of injured reserve, going with Allen instead.

As soon as possible, Lock needs to come off injured reserve. It will serve him and the team in no way to keep him off the field this season. The Broncos need to know what they have in Lock, his strengths and weaknesses and whether or not he is worth pursuing even past this year.

Why rush? Many people may be asking themselves that. The simple answer is because unless a team finds competent quarterback play, it is not going to win. And until the Broncos get a player they can grow from the ground up in their system, these losing ways are likely to continue.

“This team is close” and “this team is much better than its record.” These are things that fans and even the analysts on TV have said all season. But even if those things are true, it is in spite of the play at quarterback, just as it was with all of those names mentioned above.

Here’s what head coach Vic Fangio had to say about the idea of Lock playing:

It seems like Fangio hasn’t thought of a lot of things. But here’s what I have thought of.

A quarterback who only throws for 82 yards and completes about 40 percent of his throws while making costly turnovers is one that is going to cost you basically every single game. Is Lock not at least that good? There is absolutely no excuse not to have him on the field against the Los Angeles Chargers next week. None.

This is not to say that Lock is the answer. But it is to say that Flacco and Allen definitely are not. In other words, the “quarterback of the future” may not be on the roster.

Unless he is.

The only guy the Broncos currently have who could possibly be that future guy is Lock. So there should be no more waiting. This season, in terms of being a playoff team, is over. It is time to look toward the future and make some real, tough assessments to see where change is needed.

Because change is needed, in multiple areas. But just as it starts at starting pitcher in the major leagues or point guard on a basketball team, it starts at quarterback in the NFL.

That is not likely to ever change.

[vertical-gallery id=628254]

Nets creating more turnovers without changing much an important sign

Kenny Atkinson’s remarks after Brooklyn’s 103-101 win over the New York Knicks indicate the Nets’ chemistry is getting stronger.

After struggling defensively to start the 2019-20 season, the Brooklyn Nets have finally stabilized things on that end of the floor.

Naturally, an indicator of the Nets’ defensive improvements is their opponents’ points per game. Over the last three contests, Brooklyn has surrendered 101, 97 and 91 points.

In part, this a result of the Nets minimizing the length of their rough patches — which were sometimes quarter-long at the start of the year. When you boil it down further, Brooklyn is forcing turnovers more consistently.

Over the last five games — since Kyrie Irving was first ruled out — the Nets have forced double-digit turnovers each night. Their longest stretch of 10-plus forced turnover games in 2019-20 had previously been three games.

Of course, this is a good sign for the Nets — their record over the last five games shows that. But Kenny Atkinson’s remarks about the turnovers to reporters following Sunday’s 101-103 win against the New York Knicks indicates this won’t be a flash in the pan:

It’s all on the players. Really, there was no scheme, nothing in place. We weren’t blitzing. We didn’t extend our defense. It’s just, these guys out here are defending their tails off right now. I think we’re in the right position defensively. I think that’s helping. But, again, it’s all on the players, they’re creating the turnovers.

The Nets expressed at the beginning of the season chemistry was an issue, and it could only be resolved over time. Well, this is a sign the Nets are starting to come together.

Atkinson isn’t asking them to do anything differently. The players now have a better feel for what it is they need to do and how to work with one another to accomplish their defensive objectives.

4 takeaways from Broncos’ 20-3 loss to Bills

The Denver Broncos fell to 3-8 on the season following a 20-3 loss to the Buffalo Bills in Week 12. Here are four takeaways from the game.

The Denver Broncos put forth another dismal performance on Sunday, losing to the Buffalo Bills 20-3. The loss drops the Broncos to 3-8 on the year and one more defeat will guarantee them a third consecutive losing season.

The Bills weren’t some unstoppable force in this game but the Broncos were unable to get out of their own way, putting up some pretty sad numbers in the process. The Bills were able to just dominate the Broncos at the line of scrimmage, controlling the game from the opening kick.

Here’s what we took away from the most recent loss.

1. If you thought Brandon Allen was “the future,” you were kidding yourself

(AP Photo/Adrian Kraus)

It’s not Allen’s fault — he has done his best. But he’s not a starting quarterback and, at best, he’s a decent backup. That sounds like a bunch of guys the Broncos have tried at quarterback in recent years.

Allen was terrible in this game. He completed just 10 of the 25 passes he attempted for all of 82 yards. He held the ball too long and took some bad sacks. He threw a really bad interception and should have had at least one more and he completed a total of three passes to wide receivers.

That’s not good, and it’s not an aberration.

2. Where was the run defense?

(Mark Konezny-USA TODAY Sports)

Buffalo ran into, over and through the Broncos in this game and though not every run play gained huge yards, the Bills were able to stay dedicated to the ground attack and wear out the Broncos.

The Bills ran the ball a total of 47 times, picking up 244 yards in the process. That allowed them to control the clock and have the ball for a large portion of the game.

That’s really about all you need to know in terms of how this result panned out.

Who needs to step up for Nets while Kyrie Irving remains sidelined

Spencer Dinwiddie has done well filling in for Kyrie Irving since the superstar was first sidelined. Other Nets need to do more, as well.

The Brooklyn Nets are only one game away from having a .500 record for the first time in 2019-20 since they started 1-1. But if the Nets are to reach the mark soon, they’ll have to do so without Kyrie Irving, who is expected to miss at least the next three games.

Luckily for the Nets, they’re only facing one of the top teams in the NBA during the next stretch of games Irving will miss.

Still, the New York Knicks have put forth some good efforts against some of the NBA’s better teams. As much as the Cleveland Cavaliers are toward the bottom of the Eastern Conference standings, they’re coming off a close win against the Portland Trail Blazers — who has a tough record but still has Damian Lillard and C.J. McCollum.

Point is, Brooklyn can’t take these next two games without Irving lightly — of course, same goes for Wednesday’s matchup in Boston.

Without Irving, Spencer Dinwiddie has been the team’s most reliable scorer. Some nights he’s been more efficient than others, but he always managed to battle through the lulls in his performances. One player isn’t enough though, which was made evident in the Nets’ loss to the Indiana Pacers, who were without their two best players, yet still managed to pull off a win in Brooklyn.

Similar to Dinwiddie, Jarrett Allen has been a constant throughout the recent stretch of games. He has the potential to finish with a double-double on any given night. DeAndre Jordan is still an important role player — he scored 14 against the Charlotte Hornets and grabbed 10 rebounds against the Sacramento Kings — but Allen is Brooklyn’s force in the paint.

With Dinwiddie and Allen being Brooklyn’s two most consistent players, Joe Harris becomes the next man up. Garrett Temple shot well against the Kings and Taurean Prince had a good game against the Hornets, but Harris has been the greater offensive threat throughout the season. He’s had some off nights from the perimeter (1-for-5 vs. Indiana, 2-for-6 vs. Charlotte) but Harris is the most consistent shooter from the three. He needs to take charge during this time.

Theo Pinson and Dzanan Musa have received more time off the bench as a result of both Irving and Caris Levert’s absence. They’ve each had a double-digit scoring night during the stretch. More importantly, they don’t sit back and wait on offense. They help maintain an uptempo attack and carry a similar effort on defense.

Now, Iman Shumpert is a more important defensive piece off the bench than Pinson and Musa, and neither is likely to go off for 20 on any night. But they can help keep the game close while starters rest, and when they’re on the floor with starters, both Pinson and Musa help the nets maintain their pace.

Lastly, Shumpert has been an instant boost on defense since Brooklyn signed him. He doesn’t bring a whole lot to the table as a scorer, but with Irving out, defense has played a far greater role in the Nets’ success.

4 things to watch for when Broncos face Bills in Week 12

The Denver Broncos will be looking to get back in the win column in Week 12 against the Buffalo Bills. Here are four things to watch for.

The Denver Broncos will look to get back in the win column on Sunday but must do so but winning a tough rough game against the Buffalo Bills. The Broncos have not won in Buffalo since the 2007 season.

The Bills sit at 7-3 and are looking to solidify themselves as a true playoff team this season but the Broncos have been a tough, scrappy team despite a poor record. Will the Broncos be able to put together a full game and pull out a victory on Sunday?

Here are four things to watch for.

1. Josh Allen’s running ability

(AP Photo/David Richard)

Allen, the quarterback for Buffalo, has a cannon for an arm, but don’t sleep on his ability to run as a passer.

Though he’s far from the threat that Lamar Jackson is, Allen has gained 331 yards on the ground this year. More importantly, he’s rushed for seven touchdowns.

As a rookie, he ran for 631 yards and eight touchdowns and in 22 career games, he is averaging just under six yards per carry. The Broncos must be ready for this.

2. Isaiah McKenzie

(AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)

Remember this guy? The former Broncos draft pick is now a member of the Bills roster and he has actually found a way to be somewhat productive.

He has caught 33 passes in 16 career games with the Bills and he has a touchdown reception. He had just four catches in 11 career games with Denver.

He likely would love to stick it to his former team in this game.

It’s time for DaeSean Hamilton to show his worth

Broncos receiver DaeSean Hamilton, a fourth-round pick just last year, has been far too quiet in 2019.

Sitting at 3-7 on the season, the Denver Broncos are in a spot where it is time to see what can be taken positively into the 2020 season. That will include evaluating several players and position groups in order to determine where improvements can be made.

It was only a small sample in last Sunday’s game against the Minnesota Vikings, but the Broncos do appear to have something to work with in the passing game with the big, athletic trio of Courtland Sutton, Tim Patrick and Noah Fant.

What they need to find out for sure now is what they have in last year’s fourth-round pick, wide receiver DaeSean Hamilton.

Hamilton has been quiet this season — too quiet. Despite playing in all 10 games for the team, he has caught just 11 passes for 106 yards. Pro Football Reference shows that he has been in on just about 62 percent of the team’s offensive snaps.

So why is Hamilton finding it so difficult to become a consistent contributor on offense?

He finished the 2018 season strong, catching at least five passes in every game during the month of December while Emmanuel Sanders was injured. Those numbers encouraged many fans to believe he would take off in his second season with the team.

That has not happened.

This season, he has caught passes in just five of the team’s 10 games. He also hasn’t caught a pass since the October 17 meeting with the Kansas City Chiefs.

Does the team not really trust him? He did have some drops which made it seem like Joe Flacco almost refused to look his way at a point. Is the offense too complex? Is he just not that good? Something else?

These are just some of the questions we have to ask ourselves as to why Hamilton has been a complete non-factor in the passing game. But there is no room for excuses in professional football and soon, Hamilton will need to make some plays to show that he should be in this team’s future plans.

That should start as early as this Sunday against the Buffalo Bills.

Patrick, who just returned from injured reserve, has already developed a new shoulder injury that has slowed him down this week.

Sutton leads the team with 49 receptions, but behind him, here are the numbers for the Broncos’ other receivers this

Wide receiver Receptions Percentage of snaps
Emmanuel Sanders (traded) 30 53.47
DaeSean Hamilton 11 61.78
Diontae Spencer 5 7.40
Tim Patrick 4 10.14
Fred Brown 2 13.14

That chart shows that Hamilton has done very little despite plenty of opportunities. Meanwhile, guys like Spencer (a return specialist), Brown and Patrick (in one game) have really done more with less of a chance.

That’s concerning.

Flacco is done for the season and possibly for good in Denver. Hamilton needs to create a connection with Brandon Allen or — if he’s going to play this season — Drew Lock. That will be essential in order for the team to consider Hamilton a piece that it can use to build with in the future or if a young wideout needs to be targeted in the draft next spring.

Having just 11 catches despite being on the field for over 400 offensive snaps is just not good enough and it says one of two things. Either the team doesn’t trust Hamilton or he just doesn’t know how to get open.

This is a player who caught 214 passes for over 2,800 yards in a tough Big 10 Conference while at Penn State in college. Why has his transition to the next level been so difficult?

It’s time for Hamilton and the Broncos to begin answering these questions and looking for ways to get more production on the field. His future with the team could depend on it.

[vertical-gallery id=627997]

Special feature: Greatest heavyweights of the modern era

Boxing Junkie presents in this special feature its list of the 10 greatest heavyweights of the modern era.

The process of selecting the 10 greatest heavyweights of the modern era – post World War II – made one thing clear: There have been many outstanding big men over the past 75 years.

Boxing Junkie was able to whittle the list down to the desired number but it wasn’t easy. The criteria we used wasn’t complicated: Our decisions were based on the accomplishments of the fighters, with some consideration of their impact on the sport.

We decided not to include active fighters such as Deontay Wilder, Tyson Fury and Andy Ruiz Jr. We thought it made sense to let the current crop of heavyweights sort things out before considering them.

Wilder faces Luis Ortiz in a rematch on Saturday. Ruiz does the same with Anthony Joshua on Dec. 7.

So here is our list, with the “next five” listed after No. 10.