Matthew Stafford’s injury timeline according to Matt Patricia

Detroit Lions coach Matt Patricia offered a lengthy breakdown of the timeline of Matthew Stafford’s injury and when he knew the QB would sit

Head coach Matt Patricia and the Detroit Lions have come under scrutiny for how they handled quarterback Matthew Stafford’s injury during the week leading into Sunday’s game against the Chicago Bears. There are questions about whether the Lions gave deliberately misleading information during the daily injury reports throughout the week — enough that there are reports the NFL will investigate whether the Lions are guilty of any impropriety.

Stafford practiced throughout the week and was listed on the final injury report Friday as questionable with a back and hip injury. The news came out Sunday morning that Stafford in fact has broken bones in his back and was not medically cleared to play by team doctors.

Jeff Driskel got the start on short notice. Just how short that notice was is in question.

Patricia tackled those questions head-on in his press conference in Allen Park on Monday. When asked about the extent to which the team knew Stafford was injured and when he would not play, Patricia gave a lengthy answer.

Here it is in full. Read it in Patricia’s voice, if it helps:

“Basically the way last week worked was Stafford practiced all week. He took a lot of reps during the course of the week. Now we always practice our backup quarterback. We have for the entire season in a certain amount of reps during the course of the week. I’d say, depending on the previous game, a lot of those reps for the backup quarterback, we usually go earlier in the week. Maybe later in the week, depending on where Matthew feels in the beginning part of the week — or if it’s a short week or something along those lines.

“He felt really good through the course of the week. So that was all positive from that standpoint. We had some additional scanning Friday evening that took place, and that scanning really caused us to have some further internal discussion over the weekend. That was really what sparked some of those conversations. The discussions, the details of those, I’m going to leave private. Those are medical conversations.

“But, to be honest with you, Saturday when we came in before we left, just to prepare the team and our preparation to make sure we were doing our due diligence, because of where the rep count was, I told the team, ‘Look, we have to be prepared for all outcomes, and if it’s a situation where our quarterback can’t play, we have to be ready to go.’

“We actually extended our Saturday walk-through with that in mind. So we took a double amount of reps just to get everybody ready to go.

“It’s really no different than some of the other things we do during the course of the week with other positions, whether it’s a specialty player, a punter, a kicker. Obviously the quarterback is in the same situation, because you basically only have one guy that basically does the majority of that stuff.

“With that in mind, I wanted to make sure the team was prepared. But really knowing Matthew Stafford, he wants to play. He’s extremely tough. He’s extremely competitive, and honestly, we spent most of Saturday trying to figure out a way, if there was a way, for him to play safely. I mean, that’s really it.

“(Stafford is) very competitive; he’s honestly one of the toughest guys I’ve ever been around. I’ve seen him play through some pain in other games that I don’t know if even some of the tougher guys would’ve played through.

“So in those situations where it looks as we’re going through the course of the week and previous weeks where he’s been really sore, beat-up, and I’m like, ‘I don’t know if this guy is going to make it’ and he shows up on Sunday.

“With that in mind, knowing the toughness, knowing how competitive he is, I just wanted to wait as long as possible, really from that standpoint, because of his situations.

“And I would say the timeline for us was when we got to Chicago late Saturday night, got done with meetings, I think at that point in time that I just knew he wouldn’t start. And out of respect for him, and everything that he’s done for this organization, I just wanted to leave the option open when we got to Sunday if he wanted to dress. I think that’s important. I think that’s important to the player. I’ve been in that situation before where I had to tell a very established, long-term, longtime great player in the NFL that he was inactive. It probably broke my heart more than it broke his to tell him that. So I wanted to leave him that option, and therefore we’d make it official on Sunday morning if he wanted to dress.

“Honestly, if he woke up good Sunday and walked in, there was another conversation Sunday. So we had to meet again and go through that on Sunday morning and at that point, we made the decision it wasn’t safe. We couldn’t figure out a way to do it.

“So Jeff was told at that point that he was going to go. It wasn’t a surprise to him from that aspect of it because we prepared appropriately. And we just went out and played.”

In Driskel’s postgame press conference, he gave his own details of when he found out he would start. From the official transcripts provided by the Lions PR team:

Q. When did you find out that you would be starting?
Driskel: I mean, as a backup quarterback, there’s always opportunity or there’s always a chance you’re going to get in the game. That’s just been my mindset the whole time is, hey, you could be called on at any time, and be ready to go. And that’s just been my mindset since I got here, is when I am called upon to be ready to go.

Q. When did they tell you that you were going to play? That’s the question. Did you know Friday? Saturday? Sunday?

Driskel: Yeah, I mean like I’ve been saying, they have been telling me, since I got here, be ready to go when you’re called upon. I found out this morning when I got to the stadium.

Driskel’s answer is consistent with Patricia’s timeline and version of events.

Jeff Driskel on Matthew Stafford: ‘having his presence there was huge’

Stafford still showed leadership and competitiveness despite not being able to play

[jwplayer s2wMepUo-ThvAeFxT]

Jeff Driskel made his debut as the Detroit Lions starting quarterback in Week 10. He wasn’t terrible, guiding the team to a field goal on the opening drive and leading the Lions in rushing while completing 26-of-38 pass attempts.

Driskel was in the lineup only because Matthew Stafford was forced to end his 136 consecutive game streak with broken bones in his back. But Stafford was still actively involved on the Detroit sideline, advising Driskel after every possession.

The young backup clearly appreciated the help from Stafford. Driskel was asked if he leaned on Stafford on the sidelines.

“I think his presence is huge,” Driskel said after the game. “He’s the unquestioned leader of this team and one of the toughest dudes I’ve ever been around, most competitive people I’ve ever been around. So yeah, having his presence there was huge, not just for me but for the whole team. So yeah, it was awesome to have him there and he had my back just like I have his back when he’s out there.”

Driskel realized how tough it must be for Stafford to not be out there leading the team on the field. He talked about how great of a leader that makes No. 9.

“Yeah, I’m sure it was tough, everybody wants to be out there competing on the field and he’s done it for a long time at a high level, don’t know the exact number of starts that he’s had in a row, but it’s definitely up there. I think it’s since 2011 he hasn’t missed a start. It’s just a testament to him as a person, as a teammate and a competitor.”

Stafford’s status is undetermined for Week 11 and beyond. Driskel showed enough in his relief role to at least give the Lions a fighting chance…with Stafford in his ear helping out.

What are the Lions’ 5 biggest needs heading into the offseason?

The Lions have some serious holes to fill

Let’s just drop the pretense: Detroit’s season is over. They’re 3-5-1 and likely need to get to ten wins to even be in the wildcard conversation – or, to borrow a quote from Bob Quinn, “9-7 isn’t good enough” to make the playoffs. Not that they’ll get there, anyway. Four of their remaining games are against the NFC East-leading Cowboys and three divisional foes they’ve already lost to. And if you think Jeff Driskel is capable of helping pull off some never-say-die miracle, you’ve watched way too many Friday Night Lights reruns and should leave the room and let the adults talk like grownups.

Anyways, the Lions are dead and buried and, with any luck, Quinn’s tenure as general manager will be laid to rest at an adjacent plot. But, regardless of who leads the front office into the offseason, the team has plenty of work ahead of them. While I won’t enumerate the top five – because arguing about semantics is pointless – I reckon that the Lions’ biggest needs heading into the offseason are edge, cornerback, off-ball linebacker, guard, and wide receiver, in some order.

Saying the team needs pass-rushing help is low-hanging fruit. Trey Flowers was a quality addition, but Detroit so obviously needs to add a bookend because their pass rush as currently constituted is a minor inconvenience for QBs, at best. They’ve badly failed a defensive backs group that hunkered down early in the season and desperately waited for the cavalry to reinforce them. The Lions simply cannot endure another season in which they allow opposing passers to play pitch and catch, especially considering that their best secondary member may not be hanging around Allen Park for much longer.

Darius Slay made very apparent his discontent following the trade of Quandre Diggs to Seattle, which may have inflamed any tensions he had following his failed holdout this past offseason. Slay is due to become a free agent following next season and will turn 30 when the clock hits midnight of the 2021 new year. A lot can happen in a year’s time, but gun to my head, I say that 2020 will be Slay’s final season in the Honolulu blue. At any rate, it’s time to start thinking about a successor, so a corner in the first few rounds would make perfect sense provided it’s not another speed-walking flats-trapper with character concerns.

And speaking of bad Florida prospects, the Lions unsurprisingly need a new three-down ‘backer because Jarrad Davis has been an absolute nightmare. Unfortunately, Quinn has a weird fetish for dinosaurs that are maladapted to the modern game. Christian Jones was recently given a two-year extension that will pay him roughly $2.3M in 2020, which is perfectly reasonable considering it’s late ‘90s money for a late ‘90s backer. The guarantees are low, though, so the Lions are by no means married to him and could easily part ways with him if something better comes along or if he voices his opinions.

Jahlani Tavai is the only linebacker who should figure into the long-term plans and it remains to be seen if the team figures him for a Will or Mike. Wherever they slot him, they desperately need a competent player at the opposite spot. The problem is that the linebacking draft pool seems shallow and that few quality free agents are hitting the market this offseason, which seems like a great excuse to keep making excuses for Davis.

The 2017 draft class wasn’t all bad, although its crown jewel, Kenny Golladay, is entering a contract year. The third-year receiver is a no-brainer extension candidate, but the same can’t be said for Marvin Jones, who will be 31 when he hits free agency in 2021. A short-term extension could make sense thereafter, provided he’s not the next fan favorite traded midseason for mild draft compensation. Nevertheless, the Lions have no long-term starters at wide receiver secured past 2020. And if the Lions can’t manage to keep Golladay around and otherwise fail to address the position – knock on wood – Stafford may be stuck throwing to an airplane boneyard in the twilight of his career.

Lastly, the Lions need to address the guard position in some manner this offseason. The idea of taking two interior offensive linemen in the first round in three years is absolutely nauseating, but so is the thought of letting Graham Glasgow walk and rolling with Air Raid tackle Joe Dahl and Kenny Wiggins as the starting guards. The list of suitable free agents is likewise discouraging. Andrus Peat will likely be resigned by the Saints and Brandon Scherff is very good, but the Lions may be once bitten twice shy about giving money to an oft-injured, albeit talented veteran guard. It seems prudent to retain Glasgow and take a flier on a free agent or a mid-to-late-round guard (or both), but if they take another interior lineman in the first, you can bet I’ll be taking a bath in cow blood and flinging myself into whichever big cat pit is nearest the entrance of my local zoo.

It is not impossible for the Lions to adequately fulfill all these needs in a single offseason, but it’s discouraging that many of them are at premium positions (edge, cornerback, wide receiver) and it adds insult to injury that the others are areas in which the team has recently invested significant capital (linebacker, interior offensive line). In all likelihood, they’ll have to make compromises somewhere, so let’s just hope that they prioritize passing game players this time around.