Best and worst moves of the Lions’ free agent haul

The Detroit Lions were very active during free agency, but which moves did they nail and which ones were lacking

The first week of 2020 free agency was a very memorable one, as we have seen elite players from around the league traded away or signing with new franchises. The Detroit Lions were right in the mix of it, agreeing to terms with eight new players and executing two trades.

With signings slowing down, several media organizations took time to analyze last week’s movement, including Pro Football Focus, who went through each team moves and gave their opinion on the best and worst transactions.

Let’s start with the good news. PFF landed on the Desmond Trufant addition as the Lions’ best move after signing him to a reasonable contract, 2-year, $20 million contract.

PFF highlights Trufant as one of the most valuable cornerbacks since 2013, pointing to how highly regarded his man-to-man coverage abilities are: “Trufant will fit perfectly within Matt Patricia’s defense and adding Jeff Okudah with the third overall pick — a player who is easily the best press-man corner in this draft class — would form a top-tier duo in their secondary.”

Even though Trufant will fit perfectly into what the Lions’ are looking to do with their defense — and they are saving a truckload of money by swapping Slay for him — I would not consider this as the Lions’ best move.

My choice would have been the trade for Duron Harmon. He will bring the Lions’ defense to the next level by giving them a true single-high safety, something they have been missing since the departure of Glover Quin. Add in the fact he is very familiar with Coach Matt Patricia’s scheme and he will fit into this defense with ease.

The move that didn’t tickle the fancies of the PFF crew was the Halapoulivaati Vaitai signing, calling it one of the more shocking signings in free agency.

PFF pointed to the contract, a 5-year, $50 million deal, as being a bit high for what some would consider an inconsistent player. PFF analyzed how subpar Vaitai was in pass-protection saying, “In Vaitai’s career, he ranks just 56th of 61 tackles in PFF pass-block grade on true pass sets and allowed a double-digit pressure rate at 10-percent.”

I would not consider the Vaitai signing as the Lions’ worst move. The actual numbers for Vaitai’s contract turned out to be $45 million instead of the initial reported $50 million, with an easy out after two years — a much easier pill to swallow.

Even though Vaitai is sub-par in pass protection, he excels in run blocking and that is precisely why the Lions brought him. I also give him a pass on experience, as he was playing behind two potential Hall of Famers in Philadelphia, and it’s not his fault he never got a real chance to start and show his true potential.

My choice for the worst move is the lack of moves to fill in the holes after the departures of Graham Glasgow and Logan Thomas.

Glasgow has been an integral cog in the Lions’ offensive line since he was drafted, leaving a massive hole at right guard. While Thomas played well above his contract and was considered by some as the Lions’ second-best tight end. The team may believe Isaac Nauta is ready to fill in as the Lions’ third tight end, but it is hard to ignore how laissez-faire the Lions have been with the guard spot.

With how active the Lions were in free agency, none of the moves screamed out as an overpay, but the lack of moves is what is more concerning. No reason to panic quite yet — free agency is still young and the draft is on the horizon — especially for how unpredictable this offseason has been so far.