Verstappen wins U.S. GP Sprint after late Ferrari-McLaren duel

Max Verstappen cruised to victory in the U.S. Grand Prix Sprint ahead of fast-finishing Carlos Sainz. The Dutchman started from P1 on the grid for the first time since the Austrian Grand Prix in June but had no problem acing his getaway to put …

Max Verstappen cruised to victory in the U.S. Grand Prix Sprint ahead of fast-finishing Carlos Sainz.

The Dutchman started from P1 on the grid for the first time since the Austrian Grand Prix in June but had no problem acing his getaway to put himself ahead of a first-turn melee as the frontrunners jockeyed for position.

Front-row starter George Russell attempted to follow Verstappen through the corner but was swamped by both Ferrari drivers — Leclerc and Sainz starting third and fifth respectively — who were both eager to make up on underwhelming qualifying results.

The battle gave Lando Norris, starting fourth, a clear line down the inside, and after running the embattled Russell side by side around the outside through Turn 2, he emerged in second and directly behind Verstappen.

Norris harried the Red Bull until lap four, when Verstappen put his foot down and broke free of DRS.

The loss of straight-line boost left Norris exposed to Russell, and the Mercedes pushed hard for position at the end of the back straight. The two bravely dueled side by side through to Turn 15, where Norris reasserted himself in the position from which he was never again challenged.

It was a costly battle for Russell, cooking his medium tires. From being on the attack, he was suddenly forced to defend from the Ferrari drivers behind him.

Charles Leclerc led Sainz in the opening laps, but the Spaniard was determined to lead the charge up the field. From the first lap he relentlessly challenged the sister car for position until he barged past at Turn 15, pinning Leclerc on the curbs on exit on lap five.

With clear air, Sainz rapidly closed onto the back of Russell’s ailing Mercedes, and by lap nine he was through with a move down the inside of his favored Turn 15.

Leclerc muscled through at the same place one lap later, demoting Russell to fifth.

The scarlet cars chartered a course for Norris’ second place, and with two laps to go the trio were split by less than a second.

It took a critical mistake from Norris to break open the battle, the Briton locking up into the first turn to open the door to Sainz, who immediately punished him down the inside to take the place.

Norris committed a second lock-up at Turn 12, but having had DRS down the long back straight, Leclerc wasn’t close enough to immediately capitalize. The Monegasque attempted to double Norris’s pain at Turn 14 but was caught off-guard by the Briton holding an unusually tight line. The Ferrari had to take avoiding action to avoid a crash ending the battle in Norris’s favor.

The battle will make for enjoyable post-race viewing for Verstappen, who kept himself above the fray to record a straightforward victory.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

“It was not too bad — it feels a bit like old times,” he said forebodingly. “I’m very happy with today.

“If you look at the whole race, Ferrari was also very quick, but for us, finally we were racing again.

“Normally in the race we were always looking back behind us, but we could just do our own race. We had good pace.”

Sainz enjoyed battling up to second, though his tires were too worn to be a victory contender.

“Honestly, they were very fun battles,” he said. “A good sprint — I think if the Sprints are like this, you always enjoy them, that little bit of extra action.

“Toward the end I was starting to struggle with the tires, but I saw Lando also struggling and thought if I could get into DRS, I would have my chance to get into P2

“We made it stick into Turn 1. It was a fun one.”

Norris was happy with his result, even though his tires were too shot to defend second place by the end of the race.

“Honestly, I’m pretty happy with how things ended up,” he said. “It was a tough one. I thought I could maybe hang on to second, but Carlos did a good job.

“My front tires were completely finished; there was not a lot I could do.

“I did the most I could. I don’t think we had the pace of Max or the Ferraris, therefore happy to finish third.”

The finish cost him two points to Verstappen, extending the title margin to 54 points.

Russell finished a glum fifth ahead of teammate Lewis Hamilton in sixth, up one place from his starting position.

Haas teammates Kevin Magnussen and Nico Hulkenberg scored the final points of the Sprint in seventh and eighth.

Sergio Perez finished ninth and several seconds behind the American cars, up just two places from his grid spot after a long battle with RB’s Yuki Tsunoda for position.

Oscar Piastri crossed the line 10th after a feisty recovery from 16th on the grid after battling later with Tsunoda for the place. He was fast enough in the closing laps to negate a 5s penalty incurred for pushing Pierre Gasly off the track earlier in the Sprint.

Tsunoda beat Franco Colapinto to 11th ahead of Lance Stroll.

Alpine duo Gasly and Esteban Ocon finished 14th and 15th ahead of Liam Lawson, Alex Albon — the Williams driver having started from pit lane — and Sauber teammates Valtteri Bottas and Zhou Guanyu.

Verstappen wary of threats but more comfortable with car at COTA

Max Verstappen says his fastest time in qualifying for the Sprint at the United States Grand Prix was due to Red Bull hitting the ground running and giving him a car he’s more comfortable with. The last time he was fastest in any qualifying session …

Max Verstappen says his fastest time in qualifying for the Sprint at the United States Grand Prix was due to Red Bull hitting the ground running and giving him a car he’s more comfortable with.

The last time he was fastest in any qualifying session was in Belgium, although a grid penalty for taking a new power unit meant he did not start from pole position. Prior to that he was quickest in the qualifying sessions in Austria back in July, and after returning to the front in the Sprint Shootout at COTA the championship leader says the car was more to his liking on Friday.

“It was just a positive day,” Verstappen said. “From lap one I think the car was in a decent window; I felt quite comfortable. I could attack the high-speed corners; I think we were quite quick there.

“Then going into Sprint qualifying is always a tricky one. You do medium-medium-soft — of course on the mediums at one point you get a bit of a reference, but then you go into SQ3 and you have the soft tire and it’s only really one lap, so that was not easy. It’s the same for everyone, but you can’t really push to the limit, you have to leave a little bit of a margin, but it was OK.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

“Looking at the lap, a few little balance issues still but to be ahead of the others I think is positive. I think also when you look, Lewis [Hamilton] had a little mistake in [Turn] 12, otherwise I think he would have been up there as well. I’m happy, but I’m also aware that there are a lot of fast cars around me, but it’s definitely a positive return.”

Verstappen’s mention of Hamilton was backed up by the seven-time world champion, who says a yellow flag caused by Franco Colapinto spinning cost him what he believes would have been the fastest time.

“I just got unlucky with the yellow flag and it is what it is — I was 0.4s up,” Hamilton said, after teammate George Russell ended up just 0.012s off Verstappen.

“The good thing is the team’s made a step with the car, the upgrade has clearly worked and I’m really grateful to everyone back at the factory for all the hard work over this period of time because it’s been a tough slog for everyone to get the upgrade and make sure that they’re working. Tomorrow we got another shot.”

‘Shocking’ U.S. GP Sprint qualifying lap could have been worse – Norris

Lando Norris believes he could have been even lower than fourth on the grid for the Sprint at the United States Grand Prix due to how difficult his Friday was. Max Verstappen set the fastest time in the Sprint Shootout and will lead the field on …

Lando Norris believes he could have been even lower than fourth on the grid for the Sprint at the United States Grand Prix due to how difficult his Friday was.

Max Verstappen set the fastest time in the Sprint Shootout and will lead the field on Saturday, with his main title rival Norris down in fourth place, 0.25s adrift. The McLaren driver admitted he was not happy with his car at any stage on Friday and felt his lap was so poor that a spot on the fourth row is better than it might have been.

“Not very good,” Norris said. “P4. Not a great day. Been struggling the whole day, honestly, with the balance and the set-up. In a way, happy with P4, because I feel like it could have been a lot worse, but my lap was shocking. Not a terrible day, could have been worse, could have been better, but I’ll take it.”

Norris dismissed any suggestion that the upgrade McLaren introduced at COTA could be the cause of his struggles, and says he expects to be in a similar position over a Sprint race distance too.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

“No, not really [much chance to progress]. I hope to move forward — that’s my plan — but on pace, I think we are where we deserve to be today,” he said. “So my plan is to go forward, but I have no idea how much we can.”

It was an even worse day for teammate Oscar Piastri who dropped out in SQ1 when his best time was deleted for exceeding track limits, but the Australian is grateful it wasn’t in the main qualifying session.

“Most of the lap was good,” Piastri said. “I made a few mistakes in the last sector and, obviously, in the second-last corner I tried to go a bit too fast and that’s the result, so it’s a shame, but if there’s one good thing about sprint weekends [it’s] that we have another shot tomorrow.

“[The car] feels OK, maybe not quite as strong as what it has been in the last few races, but I don’t think that’s because we are weaker. Maybe the others are a little bit strong. Let’s see. We’re still hopefully in the fight … so it’s certainly not a case of [being] miles behind, but maybe it’s a bit more difficult for us than in some of the other weekends.”

Sealing components makes Red Bull device a non-story – FIA

The FIA believes the steps taken to ensure no team changes the ride height under parc ferme conditions will make it a non-story from the United States Grand Prix onwards. Red Bull has been the focus of attention because a rival team complained to …

The FIA believes the steps taken to ensure no team changes the ride height under parc ferme conditions will make it a non-story from the United States Grand Prix onwards.

Red Bull has been the focus of attention because a rival team complained to the FIA about its design in Singapore, leading to a clampdown from the governing body to ensure no team breaches parc ferme regulations. The FIA’s single seater director Nikolas Tombazis says sealing the component in question once it can no longer be adjusted should rule out any suspicions moving forward and attributes the recent focus to the heat of a championship battle.

“At the previous race, it was pointed out to us that certain designs could allow a change of the height of the front of the car, which some people call a bib, in parc ferme,” Tombazis told Sky Sports. “We didn’t have any indication or any proof that anybody was doing something like that. That would be clearly illegal under parc ferme regulations.

“But as I said, we didn’t have any clear indication that somebody was doing such a thing, so we said from this race onwards, there must be no possibility to do such a thing at all. If a team has a design that would allow a quick change of that height, then it had to be sealed so they could not have access in parc ferme. I think all teams have adhered to that, and as far as we’re concerned, that’s reasonably under control.

“I think it’s certainly not a story from now on. I think we’ve done all that’s needed to stop there being any accusations, and then of course it is a tight championship and people get rather excited about each other’s cars. We can’t definitively close the previous races or any insinuations between teams in a very competitive environment, but in the present situation, we believe it’s a non-story, yes.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

Tombazis says the FIA is unlikely to revisit previous races and the device’s use, despite Zak Brown’s calls for a full investigation into the way Red Bull has been running its car.

“Honestly, no. We’re talking … a couple of millimeters or something like that, potentially. We’re really talking very, very small numbers. I don’t think it’s something that we could go and check. But as I say, we don’t have any indication or proof or anything like that about something untoward having happened before.”

Red Bull team principal Christian Horner added that the setup has been in place since the start of the current regulations in 2022, and insists it has remained untouched like the rest of the car that is subject to parc ferme regulations.

“Every car has a tool that they can adjust the front of the bib, what we call the front of the floor being the bib,” Horner also told Sky Sports. “Ours is located at the front, in front of the footwell. It’s been there I think for over three years.

“You’ve got to have the pedals out, other panels and pipework out, in order to be able to get to it. It’s like any other adjustment on the car. It would be easier to adjust a rear roll bar than it is to get to that component. It’s all part of the packaging in the front end of the chassis.

“I think there’s been a bit of moaning from one of our rivals, and it’s the FIA’s job to look into these things. It’s on a list of the open source components. It’s been publicly available for the last three years. The FIA are happy with it. I think [maybe this is] just to satisfy some paranoia elsewhere in the paddock.

“It’s obvious that we’re at the start of a tripleheader — could have mentioned it three weeks ago. It was a conversation that we actually had with the FIA in Singapore. They looked at it, they’re more than happy with it…

“Just to explain to the public — there’s probably about 600 items on the car that are fully adjustable. Everybody can adjust these elements. What you can’t do is adjust them during parc ferme, and that is what hasn’t happened.

“As I say, it would be easier to adjust the floor stay or a roll bar or a push rod length than strip out the pedals. We have cameras watching the cars. We have scrutineers and witnesses watching the cars. Our car has come under more scrutiny in the last three years than any other car in the pit lane, so we’re totally comfortable.”

Verstappen pips Russell to U.S. GP Sprint pole

Max Verstappen will start the U.S. Grand Prix Sprint race from pole after a late stunner pinched top spot from George Russell after the flag. Verstappen complained throughout the session that he was struggling with ride quality and was clearly …

Max Verstappen will start the U.S. Grand Prix Sprint race from pole after a late stunner pinched top spot from George Russell after the flag.

Verstappen complained throughout the session that he was struggling with ride quality and was clearly avoiding running too wide over the curbs in the build-up to the SQ3, but his final flying lap showed no such impediment, setting the benchmark at 1m32.833s to beat Russell by just 0.012s.

It’s the first time Verstappen has set the fastest time in a qualifying session since the Belgian Grand Prix in July, and Saturday will be the first time he will start from pole since Austria in June.

“We had a good day,” he said. “Of course sprint quali is always very difficult. You never really know how much you can push, but I’m happy with today.

“I think the whole day the car was working quite well. I’m very happy to be first. It’s been a while!”

Russell’s time was arguably compromised by Mercedes sending out both its drivers unusually early in the eight-minute session, costing him a chance to capitalize on the track’s fastest conditions.

Charles Leclerc was third, qualifying 0.226s off the pace in a car that exhibited none of the vices that slowed it through the middle of the season, suggesting its recent round of upgrades prior to Austin are working.

Title challenger Lando Norris was a disappointing fourth and 0.25s slower than championship leader Verstappen. The Briton needs a perfect end to the season and at least one mistake from the Dutchman to beat him to top spot by Abu Dhabi.

Carlos Sainz will line up fifth for the fourth time in a row for a sprint race this season after lapping 0.006s slower than Norris.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

Nico Hulkenberg excelled to lead a double Haas SQ3 appearance at the American team’s home race, qualifying sixth ahead of teammate Kevin Magnussen in eighth. They sandwiched a disappointed Lewis Hamilton, who was fastest in the first sector but couldn’t complete the lap competitively after losing time drifting wide of the apex at Turn 12.

Yuki Tsunoda will line up ninth ahead of Williams rookie Franco Colapinto, whose session was compromised by a spin at Turn 12.

Sergio Perez was knocked out of qualifying in 11th, the Mexican a disappointing 0.954s slower than his SQ3-bound teammate. He was lucky not to be demoted a further place by Liam Lawson, who was just 0.04s slower in 12th but lost time bobbling over the curbs exiting the first turn on his fastest lap.

Pierre Gasly led the way for Alpine in 13th ahead of Aston Martin teammates Lance Stroll and Fernando Alonso after both had lap times deleted for exceeding track limits.

Oscar Piastri was knocked out in 16th after also having his fastest time deleted for running wide off the road at Turn 19. Had it stood, the lap would have seen him through to SQ2 in seventh.

It was the first time the Australian qualified outside the top 10 for either a sprint or grand prix since last year’s Las Vegas Grand Prix.

Esteban Ocon will start 17th ahead of Alex Albon, who spun at the final corner on his final flying lap.

Sauber teammates Valtteri Bottas and Zhou Guanyu qualified at the back of the grid.

COTA offers fans profit with buy back of ‘early bird’ USGP tickets

Circuit of The Americas is offering to buy back United States Grand Prix general admission tickets purchased by “early bird” pass holders at more than face value as it prepares to announce its music acts. The “early bird” GA sales period saw tickets …

Circuit of The Americas is offering to buy back United States Grand Prix general admission tickets purchased by “early bird” pass holders at more than face value as it prepares to announce its music acts.

The “early bird” GA sales period saw tickets sold at $299, but COTA will offer to buy back those tickets at $350 over the coming weeks, with the concert lineup set to be confirmed on April 29. COTA chairman Bobby Epstein says the aim of the initiative is to allow more than 10,000 fans a chance to cash in if they are unable to attend the race or simply want to make a profit on their earlier commitment.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

“We know that when we announce our performers for this year’s grand prix weekend that those tickets are going to be worth well more than they paid,” Epstein said. “We think that’s an unusual thing.

“But it continues to be about delivering a spectacular event that pleases racing fans and music lovers and campers and basically anyone who looks forward to sharing time with friends or family at a non-stop, something-for-everybody, fun environment. That’s what we always try and do and I think we’re going to do it better than ever this year.”

The buy-back period will run from now until May 6, meaning fans can make a choice about whether to sell their tickets after the concerts are announced at the end of April. Epstein acknowledges that could lead to COTA being bypassed in search of even higher resale prices, but says the initiative guarantees fans a profit if they want it.

“I think they’ll be able to do that, but you usually go through a reseller and they charge a commission and I don’t know where that really winds up,” he said. “But we clearly want to buy them back because we think we’re going to be able to sell them higher.

“We don’t have a reseller’s fee, but that is the point — we’ll make it easy. I don’t think many people will take us up on it but I think it makes a strong statement for us.”

Epstein says the offer shows just how highly he rates the quality of music act that will be performing at the track just outside Austin later this year.

“We’re going to put a limited amount of tickets on sale again after the music announcement at a little bit of a higher price. Still below where we went out with GA tickets last year, so we do want to show there’s value in our tickets and we will do that in a number of different ways.

“No clues, but we did a lot. Taylor Swift was the first we did that with and we’ve had a lot of superstars since — whether it’s Bruno Mars, or Pink, or Billy Joel, there are a lot of big names — but I think this is going to be perhaps the biggest since the Taylor Swift announcement. Well, this will be.”

Haas USGP review request dismissed by stewards

The Haas request for a right to review the results of the United States Grand Prix due to track limits violations has been dismissed by the stewards. The petition was lodged over the weekend in Interlagos and focused on the stewards’ decision to …

The Haas request for a right to review the results of the United States Grand Prix due to track limits violations has been dismissed by the stewards.

The petition was lodged over the weekend in Interlagos and focused on the stewards’ decision to take no further action over Alex Albon potentially exceeding track limits at Circuit of The Americas, despite an investigation at the time. Haas was also wanting a review of the final classification due to a number of other instances it had spotted, including by Logan Sargeant, Sergio Perez and Lance Stroll. All related to the drivers leaving the track at Turn 6 on multiple occasions, with Williams, Red Bull and Aston Martin part of the hearing as a result.

However, with Haas only basing its petition on the on-board footage from each of the cars involved — Albon, Sargeant, Perez and Stroll — the stewards dismissed its request, determining that the footage is not new and was available to Haas at the time.

Explaining why the footage was not accepted at the time to punish Albon, the stewards explained that it’s due to the need for consistent camera angles for all competitors at all times.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

“Track limit infringements are almost universally enforced based on principal video evidence from a fixed CCTV camera of adequate resolution positioned to clearly see a car’s position in relation to the track limit boundary,” the stewards’ decision read. “The CCTV camera for Turn 6 did not meet that standard as it did not cover the apex of the corner.

“Because onboard cameras are only useful for verifying a breach when viewing a car in front of the camera car and not the camera car itself, the stewards believed they could not accurately and consistently conclude whether a breach occurred for every car on every lap.

“Anecdotal usage of trailing car video, which may or may not be available for any given car’s potential breach at any given time does not meet that accurate and consistent evidence standard.”

Haas’ request to revisit the final classification based on potential other breaches was also dismissed as the on-board footage was available at the time, and because that can only be dealt with by protesting the lack of decisions made at the time, rather than requesting a right of review.

“The stewards reaffirm that a petition to review the final classification must concern the classification itself,” the stewards’ announcement stated. “It is not possible to exercise the right of review on the final classification to question decisions taken prior to it. This also applies to incidents for which no ruling was made during an event.”

Despite dismissing the case, the stewards noted that the fact there was evidence of so many potential unpunished breaches at Turn 6 highlights the need for the FIA to make improvements, requesting better solutions are found by the start of the 2024 season.

“Given that, notwithstanding the formal outcome of this decision, the stewards have seen individual pieces of evidence that show what appear to be potential track limit breaches at the apex of Turn 6, they find their inability to properly enforce the current standard for track limits for all competitors completely unsatisfactory and therefore strongly recommend to all concerned that a solution to prevent further reoccurrences of this widespread problem be rapidly deployed.”

Haas USGP review hearing set for Wednesday

Haas will have the chance to have its right of review into the results of the United States Grand Prix heard on Wednesday, with Red Bull, Aston Martin and Williams all involved. Guenther Steiner’s team lodged its petition for a right of review over …

Haas will have the chance to have its right of review into the results of the United States Grand Prix heard on Wednesday, with Red Bull, Aston Martin and Williams all involved.

Guenther Steiner’s team lodged its petition for a right of review over the Sao Paulo Grand Prix weekend, with RACER understanding the matter relates to track limits violations and the way they were policed. The FIA has now set a hearing for 1500 CET (0900 ET) on Wednesday, when it will hold a virtual meeting to discuss whether Haas has found a significant and relevant new element that was not available to the stewards at the time the decision was made.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

Three other teams have been summoned as part of that hearing, with Red Bull, Aston Martin, and Williams all named. The Williams connection is obvious, with the petition citing the document that outlined the stewards’ decision not to give Alex Albon a further penalty for exceeding track limits at Turn 6 in Austin.

“Based on the video footage available (which did not include CCTV), the stewards determine, whilst there might be some indication for possible track limit infringements in Turn 6, the evidence at hand is not sufficient to accurately and consistently conclude that any breaches occurred and therefore take no further action,” the decision read.

Albon finished ninth after already receiving a five-second time penalty, but would have been given a second penalty for that infringement had the stewards decided a breach had occurred. The Williams driver was classified under five seconds ahead of Nico Hulkenberg in 11th.

Another team had previously flagged Sergio Perez exceeding track limits at Turn 6 but without taking the matter further, while from an Aston Martin perspective, Lance Stroll was classified seventh.

Should Haas be able to convince the FIA that there is a significant and relevant new element, then that will lead to a further hearing that will be convened in due course.

Sargeant sees USGP point as bonus but keen to build momentum

Logan Sargeant was told about his first point in Formula 1 on a plane home from the United States Grand Prix to Florida, but while obviously delighted the young American is more focused on building momentum from a strong performance. Lewis Hamilton …

Logan Sargeant was told about his first point in Formula 1 on a plane home from the United States Grand Prix to Florida, but while obviously delighted the young American is more focused on building momentum from a strong performance.

Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc’s disqualifications post-race promoted Sargeant from 12th to 10th in the final classification, earning him the first point of his F1 career. The Williams driver was also just a matter of seconds behind teammate Alex Albon across the line after a strong performance, and he says the consistent pace he showed was more encouraging than the end result.

“I was halfway through my trip from Austin to Florida, going home to see the family for a couple of days,” Sargeant said. “James (Vowles, team principal) called me. I sort of already had a sense as someone had texted me earlier saying they’d had a hearing about it or whatever, but middle of the sky, on my way home.

“I think to be honest it was more just cherry on top to a really good Sunday, so I was already very happy with the race we’d just had. I felt I’d performed very well, and for me to get my first point, and for the team to get three at this point of the championship was obviously a nice little bonus to walk away from a good Sunday.

“Obviously everyone’s excited, happy, I’m still at the point where I want to do it crossing the line in the top 10, but still it was a very nice bonus to what was already a really good Sunday. I’m sure everyone was happy to get that out of the way and move forward from that, it’s very much a momentum sport, so to try and use that to go on and keep progressing forward.”

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1388]

Sargeant says he is starting to see the benefit of the experience he is gaining this year, having avoided the sort of error that has overshadowed former strong showings.

“I was quite happy with how Friday went at COTA — bar the fact I didn’t get a clean lap together in qualifying — but the fact I was able to find the pace at a sprint weekend at a track I didn’t know well was nice,” he said.

“Not overstepping and making a mistake, it’s all moving in the right direction in that sense, and I think as well there were points in the race where — I made a mistake in Singapore when the tires were degrading and it got to a point in Austin where through the second stint the tires were going and I could feel a sense that I was at risk and was quite vocal to change. I think in the past I wouldn’t have been — I would have just sort of let it catch me out, whereas I knew we needed to get to the last stint, and it’s little things like that that can help you move forward and not make mistakes.

“For sure (experience helps). Just knowing how difficult the car can become to drive when the tires are going off just gave me a sense of, ‘they want me to keep going but now is the time to stop’ — that’s from previous errors.”

Should F1 change its post-race technical procedures?

Picture the scene: You’ve just been to watch a thrilling race, where any one of three drivers looked to be in with a shout of winning for much of it, and there was uncertainty about the outcome right up until the final lap. Then you’ve made your way …

Picture the scene: You’ve just been to watch a thrilling race, where any one of three drivers looked to be in with a shout of winning for much of it, and there was uncertainty about the outcome right up until the final lap.

Then you’ve made your way onto the grid, watched the podium ceremony surrounded by thousands of others, slowly walked off after a few photos, sat in traffic for a while but still made it downtown to grab some dinner while buzzing about the day you’ve had.

Suddenly you start to overhear strange comments and shouts of annoyance or unusual laughter… And then you’re pretty sure the word “disqualified” was said. You grab your phone and check online and there’s the news.

So it turns out there wasn’t uncertainty about the outcome right up until the final lap — there was uncertainty about the outcome right up until over three and a half hours after the checkered flag had been waved to call off the battle.

It just doesn’t seem right, does it?

Podium ceremonies are a big part of the fan experience at F1 races…which makes their being rendered irrelevant by subsequent revelations all the more of a buzz kill. Mark Sutton/Motorsport Images

I’m sure at this point some of you are already busy typing “Do you not know motorsport?! Cars take time to go through technical checks!” And yes, they do. This is not a dig at the FIA, which cannot be expected to check everything on every car within seconds of a race finishing.

In fact, the technical brilliance that is inherent in Formula 1 is something that needs to be protected, but that doesn’t mean the time it took for the result to be changed on Sunday night can’t be looked at and learned from.

In some ways, it’s a tougher challenge than sporting penalties, because of how complex F1 machinery is and the level of detail that needs looking into during post-race scrutineering to ensure that cars are conforming with the technical regulations. But in other ways, it’s much easier.

As we evidenced by the decision that came out from the stewards on Sunday night, there is a zero-tolerance approach to technical breaches.

“The stewards note that the onus is on the competitor to ensure that the car is in compliance with the regulations at all times during an event,” the decision said. “In this particular case, the rear skid in the area defined in the Technical Delegate’s report was outside of the thresholds outlined in Article 3.5.9 e) of the FIA Formula One Technical Regulations, which includes a tolerance for wear. Therefore, the standard penalty for a breach of the Technical Regulations is imposed.”

And it’s not as if Mercedes or Ferrari argued that case at all. Mercedes technical director James Allison has since admitted there is embarrassment within the team for such an error that led to it being disqualified as the rules are so clear cut.

“Of course the disqualification is a significant blow,” Allison said. “It’s a miserable feeling. It hurts and everybody here feels it. Everybody is upset, embarrassed to a degree as well because we absolutely don’t like like being on the wrong side of the rules and just lamenting the lost points.

“Austin is a track with a very bumpy surface and therefore you are a bit more vulnerable to bumping the car on the ground. We just simply didn’t take enough margin at the end of Free Practice 1. When we had done our setup we checked the plank and everything all looked fine, untouched after the FP1 running.

“But the results of the race speak for themselves. We were illegal, so clearly, we should have had our car set a little bit higher up to give ourselves a little bit more margin. It’s of course a mistake — it’s an understandable sort of mistake in a sprint weekend where it’s so much harder to get that stuff right, especially on a bumpy track. But a lesson for us in the future to make sure that we take more margin, especially at a track like that with all its bumps.”

The issue I have is that if there are aspects of a car that can be worn during a race and need to be checked in terms of tolerances, and then a certain car — or two in this week’s case — is proven to be the wrong side of the line, why does it still take so long to be decided upon?

A lesson to be learned from an organizational point of view would be to inform teams they will be called immediately during parc ferme checks to discuss what has happened. There was nearly an hour and a half between Mercedes and Ferrari being summoned and the decision to disqualify both cars being published.

In cases like this, it doesn’t need to take that long. It’s obviously not going to be as simple as the FIA dropping everything to handle that specific situation at a certain time but that’s where resource and investment continues to be required. In a week where the governing body increased the maximum fine amount to competitors in F1 to over $1 million — money that is intended for grassroots motorsport — there surely can be other revenue streams found.

The Remote Operations Center (ROC) in Geneva that was established in the aftermath of the Abu Dhabi 2021 debacle has been up and running for more than a year but doesn’t appear to have had a hugely noticeable impact so far. Perhaps those in the ROC could be tasked with hearing from a team representative as quickly as possible when an issue with a car is found, allowing post-race checks to continue uninterrupted but a decision to be made more quickly.

And perhaps more importantly, there’s got to be flexibility when issues occur. Thresholds surely should be in place for when random technical checks produce multiple infringements of the same type, as was the case at COTA.

Four cars were checked across the top four teams — those of Hamilton, Leclerc, Max Verstappen and Lando Norris — and two of the four were found to be in breach of the regulations. With a 50% hit rate, checking the planks of at least one car from each team should surely become the required follow-up.

The counter argument is everything needs packing up to take to Mexico City, but then we’re in danger of seeing the desire to chase more revenue by constantly adding more races be to the detriment of the actual sporting competition itself. Maybe we’re not quite at that point yet, but that balance needs to be kept in mind.

Austin wasn’t a case of the FIA doing anything wrong — in fact, doing it right by finding discrepancies that then act as deterrents to all teams — but lessons can certainly be learned to ensure fans have a better chance of actually knowing the outcome of a race before they’ve left a track, and teams feel they’ve all been judged equally.