Chiefs tender exclusive rights free agent LB Cole Christiansen

The Kansas City #Chiefs tendered exclusive rights free agent LB Cole Christiansen on Monday.

The Kansas City Chiefs have made an offseason move to retain a promising member of their defense for the 2024 NFL season.

The deadline for extending a qualifying offer or risk losing a player to free agency quickly approached, and the Chiefs front office decided to keep several players. According to Matt Derrick of Chiefs Digest, Cole Christiansen has received his qualifying tender from the team.

The 26-year-old linebacker has spent the past two seasons with the Chiefs after starting his career in 2020 with the Los Angeles Chargers.

Christiansen spent most of his time on special teams under coordinator Dave Toub. He played in five regular-season games and had some time on the field during the postseason. He took advantage of the extra playing time in the Week 18 season finale against the Chargers, earning him a spot on the postseason roster and his second consecutive Super Bowl title with the Chiefs.

The former Army standout was on both the practice squad and team roster throughout his two years in Kansas City. With training camps approaching soon, he will have a chance to improve his stock ahead of the 2024 season.

Chiefs TE Jody Fortson, QB Shane Buechele sign ERFA tenders

The #Chiefs got a little business done before the break between mandatory minicamp and training camp.

[connatix div_id=”3f8b015acdd24c648befc5d5dac47469″ player_id=”afe1e038-d3c2-49c0-922d-6511a229f69c” cid=”7cbcea0d-4ce2-4c75-9a8d-fbe02a192c24″]

In mid-March, the Kansas City Chiefs extended a qualifying contract offers to Exclusive Rights Free Agents (ERFAs) Jody Fortson and Shane Buechele. According to the NFL’s personnel notice for Thursday, those players have now signed their ERFA tenders, which is merely a formality ensuring that both players would be back in 2023.

For those who are unfamiliar with the term, ERFAs are veteran free agents who have yet to accrue three full seasons in the NFL. To accrue a season, a player must be on a team’s roster for a minimum of six games.

If an ERFA is tendered a qualifying contract offer by their team prior to the beginning of free agency, they can’t refuse said offer to become an unrestricted free agent. They can only reach unrestricted free agency if a team declines to extend a qualifying offer, otherwise, that team holds exclusive negotiating rights.

Based on both players’ years accrued, the tender amounts should come in at a non-guaranteed $940K in 2023. Both contracts fall below the top-51 cutoff for the salary cap during the offseason.

Fortson and Buechele have both proven to be valuable depth pieces for Kansas City over the years. Buechele has been the No. 3 QB for the Chiefs since entering the league as an undrafted free agent out of SMU in 2021. Fortson emerged as one of the best run-blocking tight ends in the NFL just a season ago. It’s quite the heel turn from joining the team as an undrafted free-agent wide receiver out of Valdosta State University back in 2019.

[lawrence-auto-related count=3 category=1]

Touchdown Wire gives Seahawks ‘C grade’ for free agency so far

After the first week of NFL free agency, Touchdown Wire gives the Seattle Seahawks a “C grade” for their activity and dealings so far.

We are nearing the end of the first official week of NFL free agency, and despite all the restrictions as a result of the coronavirus outbreak, teams are finding ways to get deals done.

The Seahawks have made a number of moves so far but will not be announcing any contracts are official until the physicals are completed and the paperwork signed.

That being said, with the reports of the deals so far, here’s a look at Touchdown Wire’s analysis of Seattle’s free agents gained and lost to date.

Doug Farrar and Mark Schofield put together the following thoughts on the Seahawks’ dealings.

“Losing offensive lineman/hybrid tight end George Fant to the Jets wasn’t a big deal for the Seahawks, but losing outside/inside pass-rusher Quinton Jefferson to the Bills presents a bigger issue,” Farrar and Schofield write. “Jefferson is one of the NFL’s most underrated defensive linemen, and Seattle doesn’t have another guy with Jefferson’s capabilities unless Jadeveon Clowney re-signs in the Emerald City. Losing Jefferson also takes some of the luster off the Jarran Reed re-signing, though Reed is a quality player. Signing former first-round pick Bruce Irvin back gives a bit of edge-rush capability, as well as linebacker depth for the team that plays more base defense than any other. The sleeper deal so far for Seattle, we suppose, is multi-positional offensive lineman B.J. Finney, who fills a few backup holes but doesn’t solve the team’s longstanding protection issues in a larger sense.”

Farrar and Schofield will continue to update their analysis on the Seahawks’ free agent moves, but give the team a grade of “C” so far.

You can follow all of Seattle’s latest moves here.

[lawrence-related id=58010]

What are RFAs and how do NFL tenders work?

What is a restricted free agent in the NFL and how do tenders work?

The start of the new league year and NFL free agency is just over a week away, so teams will soon begin placing tenders on restricted free agents. What exactly does that mean?

In the NFL, a restricted free agent (RFA) is a player with three accrued seasons (playing in at least six games a year) who has an expiring contract. Teams have several options with RFAs.

The first option is to not tender them, allowing them to become an unrestricted free agent. The Broncos are not expected to tender cornerback De’Vante Bausby this offseason (he is one of the team’s six RFAs).

The other option is to use a one-year tender with either a first-, second- or original-round designation. The original-round tender is worth exactly what it sounds like — the round that the players was originally drafted in.

A player with a tender tag can negotiate with other teams but his original team has the right to match any offer he receives from another team.

If the original team chooses not to match a contract offer from another team, the team signing the player must trade their corresponding draft pick (either a first-, second- or original-round pick) to the original team.

For example, if Denver places a second-round tender on nose tackle Mike Purcell and he signs an offer sheet with the Cowboys, the Broncos would have the option to either (a) match that offer or (b) acquire Dallas’ second-round draft pick in exchange for losing Purcell.

This year, first-round tenders are expected to be worth $4,667,000, according to OverTheCap.com. Second-round tenders are expected to be worth $3,278,000 and original-round tenders are expected to be worth $2,144,000.

If Denver uses a second-round tender on Purcell and he receives no other offers from other teams, the Broncos will owe him $4.667 million in 2020. To view Denver’s complete list of RFAs, click here.

[vertical-gallery id=634168]

The argument for not spending the most-valuable RFA tender on Taysom Hill

The New Orleans Saints have a tough decision to make for pending free agent Taysom Hill, and other teams might make it only more difficult.

[jwplayer Lf98Hbuc-ThvAeFxT]

What are the New Orleans Saints going to do with Taysom Hill? As a pending restricted free agent, they have plenty of options. The Saints can either re-sign Hill to a long-term contract extension, let him walk away uncontested, or issue one of three different one-year tenders, each worth slightly more than the ones beneath it and fully-guaranteed against the salary cap. With five different restricted free agents to consider, the Saints must act quickly.

The lowest-level contract tender is estimated to cost about $2.1 million, and would give the Saints the right to match any contract offers Hill gets from other teams. The middle-tier tender is expected to be worth roughly $3.2 million, and would recoup a second-round draft pick for the Saints should they not match an offer sheet. The top-level tender will be somewhere around $4.6 million in value and brings back a first-round pick if Hill leaves.

That makes the second-round tender the smart choice. One of several things would happen:

  • Hill receives no offers, and plays the 2020 season on a below-market $3.2 million (estimated) salary cap hit
  • Hill receives an offer, which the Saints match, and keep him around long-term on whatever his market value is
  • Hill receives an offer, and the Saints decline to match, replacing the second-round pick they lost in last year’s draft-day trade

Right now, it’s unclear what Hill’s value will be on the open market. If teams view him as a backup quarterback with starter’s upside, he should be worth about $7.5 million per year (like Ryan Tannehill, Teddy Bridgewater, and Case Keenum). If he’s perceived as an Andy Dalton-esque mid-level starter, that number climbs to $16 million per year. Even low-level backups like Chase Daniel, Ryan Fitzpatrick, and Tyrod Taylor are getting $5 million per year or better.

But that assumes his future really lies at quarterback. Despite the Steve Young comparisons floating around, Hill’s best work comes everywhere but quarterback. He caught as many touchdown passes in the 2019 regular season as passes he’s completed in his career (6). He’s a very fun player, but his talents are best used elsewhere.

And the clock is ticking on how much longer he’ll have the athleticism he’s thrived with recently. Hill turns 30 later this year and has a lengthy injury history from his college days, though he’s managed to avoid damaging hits so far in the NFL. He could look like a very different (and much more limited) athlete in just three or four years, and he hasn’t shown the passing ability to compensate for it.

So what could his contract look like if he continues to play such a nebulous position, listed at quarterback but doing everything else? The low end might be San Francisco 49ers fullback Kyle Juszczyk, who similarly blocks, runs, and catches while earning $5.25 million per year. The Detroit Lions just paid backup tight end Jesse James $5.65 million per year, while starters like Trey Burton ($8 million), Jared Cook ($7.5 million), Tyler Higbee ($7.25 million), and Jack Doyle ($7.1 million) each set a hypothetical lead for Hill to chase. His ability to throw and play special teams should only raise that bar.

It all shapes up for another difficult road to arbitration not unlike the Jimmy Graham franchise tag dispute that once dominated an offseason. Even if the Saints successfully keep Hill around for 2020 on a tender (at whichever level suits you), this is an obstacle they’ll have to overcome sooner or later. Better to let other teams make Hill an offer and decide what his market value is, and then choose whether it’s a price the Saints are willing to pay.

Teams will not give up a first round pick for a 30-year-old, maybe-quarterback. But there are several franchises that could justify giving up a second-rounder, like the Indianapolis Colts (who have two picks in the second round, at Nos. 34 and 44), Miami Dolphins (picking at Nos. 39 and 56), Seattle Seahawks (Nos. 59 and 64), and even the Atlanta Falcons (Nos. 47 and 55). Any of those teams could have varying degrees of interest in Hill as a quarterback, tight end, or versatile weapon like the Saints currently use him.

And any of those picks is worth more to the Saints than what he’s currently doing. They could use a second-rounder to help land a real developmental passer who, unlike Hill, has time to grow and play a long time (like 21-year-olds Jordan Love or Jalen Hurts). Or they could pick up badly-needed receiving help who won’t need to be schemed touches, and can beat opponents outright for the next decade (such as tight end Thaddeus Moss, or wide receivers Justin Jefferson and Brandon Aiyuk).

This is an opportunity for the Saints to gain more certainty and answer some questions, regardless of how badly it would upset Hill’s biggest fans. And that’s understandable: he hasn’t let anyone down yet. He’s caught every pass and converted every first down and lucked out with some great adjustments by his receivers on a couple of ugly passes deep downfield. But the law of averages suggest that at some point he’ll regress, and the Saints would do better to move on too soon than invest too much in him too late.

All of this in mind: we don’t know what’s going to happen in March. The Saints could very well value Hill so strongly that they anchor themselves to him with the first-round tender, or even a contract extension. They could also pinch pennies and risk a right-of-first-refusal tender, which would recoup no draft picks if he leaves. It’s risky, but the second-round tender is a happy medium that doesn’t cost much but promises many of the same results as the most-expensive level option.

So here’s our proposal. What would you choose? Matching a contract offer in the range of four years and $33 million, or a draft pick in the first half of the second round, and the cheap four-year rookie deal that comes with it? This is the sort of problem the Saints must grapple with in the months ahead.

[vertical-gallery id=26750]

What should the Saints do with their 5 restricted free agents?

It’s time for the New Orleans Saints to make contract decisions on restricted free agents like Taysom Hill, Justin Hardee, and Austin Carr.

Many New Orleans Saints players are set to enter unrestricted free agency, giving them the opportunity to negotiate with new teams and potentially land a big payday. However, five of their teammates are going into March’s signing period with restricted free agency status. Here’s what that means.

Restricted free agents can negotiate with other teams, but their current squad can claim the right of first refusal through exercising one of several different one-year contract tenders. But the ability to match contract offers comes with a price.

The latest projections from Over The Cap suggest tender values in the range of $4,667,000 (for first-round pick compensation) to $3,278,000 (second-round pick compensation), and $2,144,000 (for original-round draft pick compensation). Those totals are fully-guaranteed against the salary cap.

New Orleans doesn’t have a good history with restricted free agency. They have only used the lowest tender level in recent memory, and rarely matched opposing contract offers. They let wide receiver Willie Snead leave uncontested when the Baltimore Ravens signed him to a two-year, $7 million deal in 2018. Backup tight end Josh Hill signed a three-year, $7.5 million offer sheet with the Chicago Bears in 2016, but the Saints matched it and extended him again in 2018.

They didn’t even tender defensive tackle Tyrunn Walker back in 2015, despite it only costing about $1.54 million at the time and Walker having shown some rare bright spots in a historically-bad defense (the Detroit Lions signed him to a one-year, $1.75 million deal, and re-upped him the next season). He’s an example of a player the Saints hoped they could keep on a veteran’s minimum salary, which is obviously a riskier option.

But things are projecting differently in 2020. There’s a good chance the Saints exercise one of the more-valuable tender options; in fact, they may have to. They could also work out long-term contract extensions if they so choose; Saints kicker Wil Lutz did just that last year, when he was a restricted free agent. Here are the five Saints players that qualify, and what the team should do with each of them.

Justin Hardee, cornerback

Chris Graythen/Getty Images

Hardee’s had an interesting career path, and now he’s one of the Saints’ central special teams aces. He plays often on the punt and kickoff units, and led the team in snaps played in the game’s third phase (362) last season, outpacing even Craig Robertson (324) and Taysom Hill (286). He’s someone the Saints coaches have invested years of development in, and should definitely try to keep around for the future.

The question they have to ask now is how much Hardee’s contributions are worth. He doesn’t play defense (just 37 snaps logged last season) and is still learning the position’s finer points after entering the NFL as a wide receiver. He can’t be counted on just yet to be a top backup behind Marshon Lattimore and Janoris Jenkins. But his presence on special teams speaks for itself, and the Saints might do well to sign him to the lowest contract tender, then wait and see whether the market can set a price on his long-term contract value.

Verdict: Sign him to a right-to-match tender.