Frustration at Pac-12 CEO Group grows for allowing elite football league to die

#Pac12 football has rarely been better, and yet the conference is dying. How angry are #Pac12 lifers? Very.

The people who work at Trojans Wire, Buffaloes Wire, and Ducks Wire live in the West. One Trojans Wire writer lives in California, another in Arizona. Multiple Buffaloes Wire writers live in the state of Colorado, and multiple Ducks Wire writers live in Oregon. We’re Westerners who have identified with the Pac-12 Conference and what it has meant to us over the years. It’s a little more personal for the Oregon and USC writers in our group, given that we’ve been part of the Pac-12 since birth. For Colorado fans and bloggers, the association with the Pac-12 isn’t as longstanding. Still, this is an era which is ending when it didn’t have to.

The Pac-12 is playing such great football right now, and yet this conference won’t exist in a year. It’s all very sad.

We asked our panel of Pac-12 experts, “How annoyed are you that the Pac-12 CEO Group allowed this great conference to die?”

The answers:

Matt Wadleigh, Trojans and Buffaloes Wire: It’s a frustrating scenario all the way around, but it seemed bound to happen at some point. Once USC and UCLA left, there was no question the end was in sight.

Zachary Neel, Ducks Wire: It’s unfortunate, for sure. We also have to remember that the conference rarely, if ever, looks this strong. If we had 10 years of this type of production going back to 2013, then the conference doesn’t die. It’s more poor timing, in my mind.

Matt Zemek, Trojans Wire: It is both hugely depressing and extremely infuriating to watch all this great Pac-12 football one year before the conference dies. None of this needed to happen. What also gets me is that the Pac-12 CEO Group has nixed deals in the past which, if approved, would have helped the conference. George Kliavkoff needed to tell the CEOs to shut up and fall in line last year when ESPN offered the $30 million per school package. Kliavkoff obviously didn’t study history or exercise the leadership needed to tell the CEOs what they needed to hear. Such wimps. Such small men. All of this was preventable.

Catch all of Ducks Wire’s Pac-12 team overviews for the 2023 season:

Arizona — Arizona State — California — Colorado — Oregon State  — Stanford — UCLA — USC — Utah — Washington — Washington State

Is it an advantage or disadvantage for USC to play Colorado early in the season?

Will Colorado be at its best in September, when USC faces CU, or will this team be even tougher to play in November?

Before this 2023 Pac-12 football season began, we wrote the following:

“Deion Sanders and the Colorado Buffaloes are the biggest wild card in all of college football. With a roster full of transfers, there are so many question marks as to how good or bad this team will be.

“In this latest edition of our Pac-12 football preview predictions, Jack Carlough of Buffaloes Wire, Matt Wadleigh and Matt Zemek of Trojans Wire, and Zachary Neel of Ducks Wire gave their predictions for the Buffs.”

Those predictions ranged from 2-10 to 6-6. No one predicted CU would have a winning record. Now, everything feels different. A 6-6 record might be the low end of a win-loss record for Colorado, with 7-5 being a real possibility.

Colorado being better than expected invites this question:

Is playing Colorado early in the year an advantage or disadvantage for Oregon and USC?

We put this question to Colorado and Oregon analysts plus Trojans Wire staffers. Here’s what they said:

How has the Pac-12 football season changed after Week 1?

On one hand, the heavyweights all looked good. On the other hand, the middle and lower tiers might be stronger than we thought.

We noted that the complexion of the Pac-12 football season feels different after just one week.

“Colorado’s win over TCU was so impressive that it vaulted two Buffaloes into the Heisman Trophy spotlight after just one game,” we wrote. “Quarterback Shedeur Sanders threw for over 500 yards. Travis Hunter played receiver and quarterback and was, alongside Sanders, one of the two best players on the field. He logged close to 130 snaps in 100-degree Texas heat in Fort Worth and did not wear down late in the game. Hunter and Colorado simply defied the odds.

“Now, that USC-Colorado game on Sept. 30 in Boulder looks a lot more daunting for the Trojans.”

The balance of power in the middle and lower tiers of the Pac-12 Conference could be different from what we expected.

We asked a group of Oregon and Colorado experts — in addition to our Trojans Wire staff — the following question: How does Colorado’s emergence change the Pac-12 season for the conference as a whole?

How does Colorado’s unexpected emergence change the season for USC?

Colorado and Oregon experts join our staff to explore big #Pac12 football topics. What does Colorado’s rise mean for USC?

We are asking our Pac-12 experts questions about the first week of the college football season and what it means for the road ahead. There is a lot to discuss in the Pac-12 Conference, a league which could be very special in the coming months. There are no guarantees, but the potential is there for the Pac-12 to do extremely well on a lot of levels.

We asked our expert panel the following question: How does Colorado’s emergence change the Pac-12 season for USC?

Colorado and Oregon analysts joined our team at Trojans Wire. Get insights from a range of different voices on the big topics of the week in Pac-12 football:

Big 12 fans simply can’t handle Pac-12 football success in Week 1

#Big12 fans should be happy. Their conference will live on. The #Pac12 will die. Yet, the Pac going 13-0 caused a lot of people to go crazy.

It was very weird to see Big 12 football fans cope with a really bad weekend for their conference. The Big 12 had a fantastic offseason thanks to commissioner Brett Yormark, who ran rings around Pac-12 boss George Kliavkoff and the Pac-12 CEO Group. Yormark secured the Big 12’s long-term future with savvy and well-timed deals. The Pac-12 CEO Group, meanwhile, rejected a 2022 ESPN deal which would have kept the conference intact and unified. Kliavkoff, aware of how Larry Scott failed to exercise good leadership in the past, failed to tell the Pac-12 CEOs to get in line and accept the conference-saving deal. He allowed himself to get steamrolled, and in the process, he didn’t lead the conference with toughness or courage in its hour of peril. He allowed the CEOs to take down the conference, which will soon die.

Big 12 fans should be happy that their conference will live while the Pac-12 will not. It’s what they wanted. Big 12 fans should be able to easily shrug off what happened on the field this past weekend. So what if the Pac-12 didn’t lose a game, and the Big 12 suffered several bad losses? The Pac-12 won’t exist next year. Four Pac-12 schools will join the Big 12.

If the Big 12 is bad in football this year while the Pac-12 is great, it shouldn’t matter to Big 12 folks. They have a future, and they will add Pac-12 member institutions. The Pac-12 is dying.

Yet, the Pac-12’s success in Week 1 really seemed to get under the skin of Big 12 fans, who watched their conference stumble on several occasions. Insecurity apparently didn’t end with the offseason realignment skirmishes which dominated the conversation in college sports.

See for yourself how unsettled and restless Big 12 fans were. More specifically, notice how often a Big 12 fan would point out the Pac-12’s long-term failures when the discussion point was only the 2023 season, not the past seven to 10 years:

2023 Pac-12 football standings: Week 1

The #Pac12 dominated college football this weekend. Enjoy these standings — they aren’t going to be perfect for long.

The 2023 college football season is officially underway. In what looks to be the final season of the Pac-12 Conference (unless Oregon State and Washington State convince others to come), it has gotten off to a booming start.

The Colorado Buffaloes stunned TCU in Deion Sanders’ first game, and Oregon and Washington pummeled their opponents in lopsided affairs.

With Week 1 (and Week Zero) officially behind us, let us examine the Pac-12 standings. Don’t worry: As the weeks go by, this picture will get more and more puzzling and wackier, which is why we all love college football.

Believe it or not, the entire Pac-12 won this weekend. Rarely are the standings ever going to look like this again:

Pac-12 dominated in Week 1, but fans aren’t happy due to league’s death

It’s so #Pac12: The league looks as great as it has in a long time, but no one is happy because the Pac won’t exist in 2024.

You really can’t make this stuff up, can you? The Pac-12 Conference, on its deathbed, its membership scattered and peeled away one by one to other Power Five conferences, looks great on the football field in 2023. Washington scored 56, USC 66, Oregon 81. Colorado won as a 20-point underdog at TCU, the school which made the national championship game this past January.

Washington State won in a road blowout at Colorado State. Cal won in a big blowout at North Texas. Stanford hammered Hawaii on Friday. UCLA handled its business against Coastal Carolina. Utah beat Florida by 13 points on Thursday in a game which wasn’t that close. Arizona smashed Northern Arizona. Arizona State didn’t look great, but it did win its opener.

The Pac-12 is unbeaten heading into Oregon State’s Sunday game versus San Jose State. The league hasn’t lost a game yet. It should be a time to celebrate how much the conference has improved, and how good the conference could become this year. It’s probably the second-best conference in college football behind the SEC. People should be happy.

They’re not. It’s for a simple reason: The conference is dying.

People can’t believe this is happening, as you can see below:

Pac-12 fans lose their minds as conference is perfect while Big 12 crashes in Week 1

The #Pac12 didn’t lose on Saturday, while 3 #Big12 teams favored by 14 or more all lost. You can’t make this stuff up.

Baylor was favored by nearly four touchdowns against Texas State at home. TCU was favored by 20 points against Colorado at home. Texas Tech was favored by two touchdowns over Wyoming on the road. Each of those three Big 12 teams lost outright on Saturday, part of an absolutely miserable day on the field for the Big 12.

Texas struggled for much of the first half against Rice before pulling away in the second half. West Virginia’s offense once again looked bad in a loss to Penn State.

New Big 12 members BYU and Houston looked terrible on offense in sluggish, uncomfortable wins against opponents they should have beaten by larger margins. Neither BYU nor Houston were able to score as many as 18 points (let alone 30 or 35 or 40).

The Big 12 was bad in Week 1 of the college football season. There wasn’t a single notable win from the conference. Oklahoma did, in fairness, look great, but that was against a cupcake opponent, Arkansas State. The Big 12 didn’t score a win over a high-quality team. Not one.

Meanwhile, the Pac-12 did not lose a game this week and has not yet lost a game this season. USC scored 66 points in a 52-point win. Oregon scored 81. Washington absolutely thumped Boise State. Stanford scored an impressive win at Hawaii. Cal scored 58 in a blowout of North Texas. Utah thrashed Florida on Thursday in a high-profile game. Last but certainly not least, Deion Sanders and Colorado stunned TCU, the team which made the national championship game last year.

The Pac-12 was supposed to be good at the top of the conference, with USC, Oregon, Washington, and Utah forming a fabulous four. However, with Colorado being much better than expected and the Bay Area schools looking far better than anyone anticipated, this conference looks like an absolute sausage grinder in which nearly every game will be tough. It is the best the Pac-12 has looked from top to bottom in a very long time.

Yet, the conference is basically dead, all while the Big 12 is safe and sound because of the Grand Canyon-sized gulf in leadership and savvy from executives and administrators. It’s all very bizarre, and it has to be infuriating for Pac-12 fans who know that this high level of football won’t continue into 2024 … because there won’t be a Pac-12 Conference by then.

Pac-12 fans couldn’t really laugh at the Big 12 because their conference is about to die. It’s one of the strangest things we’ve seen in college sports, but it played out on social media on Saturday:

Washington State and Oregon State will not go to the AAC, shutting down one possible option

Washington State and Oregon State are the only Pac-12 teams left. The AAC rejected them. Only two options appear to be left for WSU and OSU.

Is the Mountain West Conference the only realistic landing spot for Oregon State and Washington State?

We noted a few weeks ago that the Big 12 “would be the first preference for the Cougars and Beavers, but they’re not calling the shots. Brett Yormark is. If the Big 12 shuts the door to WSU and OSU, the merger with the Mountain West might have to be accepted, as undesirable as it might be. Oregon State and Washington State are not in a good position to become independent the way Stanford conceivably could.”

It turns out that the Big 12 does not want Oregon State and Washington State, and that Stanford did not want to be independent in football. OSU and WSU are part of a “Pac-2” now that Stanford and Cal have moved to the ACC. Is it Mountain West or nothing? With the AAC closing the door to WSU and OSU, that seems increasingly likely.

Let’s look at the Wazzu and Oregon State views of conference realignment as it stands:

Cal is in the ACC because of Stanford, much as UCLA is in the Big Ten due to USC

The folks in Berkeley might not like Stanford, but they should be thankful the Cardinal carried them to the ACC. It’s the only reason they found safe harbor.

One of the basic lessons of college sports realignment: It pays to have a travel buddy with a lot of dollars and clout. Just ask UCLA. Go to Berkeley and ask California.

UCLA would not be in the Big Ten if USC didn’t exist and have a world-class football program. UCLA was the tag-along travel partner which got invited onto the Big Ten plane because USC had the box-office appeal Fox Sports wanted. All that extra television money offered by Fox was due to USC’s presence in college football. As good as UCLA basketball is, the Bruins don’t drive the bus. They rode USC’s coattails and got on board the Big Ten charter flight.

It’s very much the same with Cal and Stanford in the ACC. Stanford did the heavy lifting. Stanford has the massive endowment and a financial house which is fundamentally in order, unlike Cal. Stanford lobbied hard for this ACC move. Cal, its leadership and administration in disarray, was quiet and relatively impotent in this larger series of events. Stanford carried Cal to the ACC, and that’s not something anyone would reasonably dispute.

UCLA and Cal can thank USC and Stanford for giving them a new conference home in the wake of the Pac-12 splintering and dying.

Let’s look at more elements and plot points attached to the reality that Cal is going to the ACC: